Search

Background: Second-generation antipsychotic drugs are increasingly used to treat depressive disorders with psychotic symptoms. In addition to effectively managing psychotic symptoms, second-generation antipsychotics can also result in adverse drug reactions in patients, which should not be underestimated. Case presentation: We report the case of 14 years old unmarried female patient with depression. At first, she started with moping and gradually developed into self-injury and whispering. After antidepressant treatment combined with the second-generation antipsychotic drug blonanserin, the patient's psychotic and depressive symptoms improved significantly, while the patient developed lactation, which stopped after the medication was changed. Conclusions: Although Blonanserin's clinical trials have reported rare adverse reactions like elevated prolactin levels and even lactation, caution is still needed in clinical application of the drug. This case is expected to improve psychiatrists' choice of antidepressant therapy in combination with antipsychotic drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Second-generation antipsychotic drugs are increasingly used to treat depressive disorders with psychotic symptoms. In addition to effectively managing psychotic symptoms, second-generation antipsychotics can also result in adverse drug reactions in patients, which should not be underestimated. Case presentation We report the case of 14 years old unmarried female patient with depression. At first, she started with moping and gradually developed into self-injury and whispering. After antidepressant treatment combined with the second-generation antipsychotic drug blonanserin, the patient’s psychotic and depressive symptoms improved significantly, while the patient developed lactation, which stopped after the medication was changed. Conclusions Although Blonanserin’s clinical trials have reported rare adverse reactions like elevated prolactin levels and even lactation, caution is still needed in clinical application of the drug. This case is expected to improve psychiatrists’ choice of antidepressant therapy in combination with antipsychotic drugs.

Nausea and vomiting are common experiences and are often dreaded more than pain. This review discusses blonanserin, mirtazapine, and isopropyl alcohol as antiemetics. Blonanserin, an atypical antipsychotic with a high affinity for dopamine D2 and D3 receptors and serotonin receptor 5-HT2A, has less of a risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects. Transdermal blonanserin, available in Korea, Japan, and China in a small number of trials, has improved nausea in patients not responding to standard antiemetics. Mirtazapine is a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant that has been used for multiple symptoms besides depression. There is little evidence that mirtazapine improves anorexia or nausea in advanced cancer but is as effective as olanzapine in reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Isopropyl alcohol aromatherapy has been successfully used in the emergency department for nausea and vomiting with an onset to benefit more rapidly than standard antiemetics. Isopropyl alcohol prep pads can be used for home-going antiemetic therapy and as a bridge to treating acute nausea until standard antiemetics take effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This clinical trial primarily aimed to investigate the effects of blonanserin on social functioning in patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Methods: In this prospective, multi-centre, single-arm clinical trial study, blonanserin (flexible oral dose ranging from 8mg to 24mg per day) was given 26 weeks. Outcome measures included the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale for evaluating social functioning, the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) for measuring neurocognitive performance, and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for assessing symptom severity. The primary endpoint was social function improvement evaluated by PSP scale at the end of blonanserin treatment. And the secondary endpoint was to validate the efficacy and neurocognitive effects of blonanserin. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were also recorded and analysed. Results: A total of 96 patients with first-episode schizophrenia were recruited and proceeded to analysis. Fifty-one participants (53.1%) completed the PSP scale measurements at baseline and week 26. Following 26 weeks of blonanserin treatment, all outcome measurements demonstrated significant improvement during the follow-up period. Notably, PSP scores exhibited a continuous increase up to 68.1% ± 103.7% at the end of the treatment (46.6 ± 14.6 at baseline, 69.4 ± 17.4 at week 26, p<0.001), indicating positive effects on social functioning that were already noticeable by week 8. Conclusion: Blonanserin treatment exhibited favourable effects on social functioning in individuals with first-episode schizophrenia. The results suggest that blonanserin was effective treatment options for patients with schizophrenia encountering functional impairments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Blonanserin is a novel oral antischizophrenic drug. Under fasting (n = 50) and fed (n = 60) conditions, this study compared the bioequivalence of the generic blonanserin tablet with the reference blonanserin tablet. In this single‐center, randomized, open‐label, 2‐period, 2‐sequence, crossover study, 110 patients were randomly given a 4‐mg dose of either the test or reference blonanserin tablet with a 14‐day washout period. Blood samples were taken before performing and up to 72 hours following. A validated high‐performance liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry technique was used to measure the levels of blonanserin in plasma. Safety was evaluated throughout the study. The study found no significant differences in the maximum observed drug concentration in the plasma (Cmax), the area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from time 0 to the last sampling time (AUC0‐t), and the area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0‐∞) between the 2 blonanserin formulations. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratio of the test/reference formulations for Cmax, AUC0‐t, and AUC0‐∞ were within the 80%‐125% limit. Food dramatically raised blonanserin exposure, and also significantly prolonged the lag time of absorption. No serious adverse events occurred. These results indicate that the 2 blonanserin formulations were bioequivalent and well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. In clinical treatment, it is necessary to consider the food effect of blonanserin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of blonanserin and risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia and to provide reliable pharmacotherapeutic evidence for in the clinical treatment of schizophrenia. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases for head-to-head randomized controlled trials that compared blonanserin with risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia. We extracted the following data: author, year, country, diagnostic criteria, sample size, course of treatment, dosage and outcomes. Our main endpoint was the changes in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores. Meta-analysis of the included data was conducted by RevMan 5.3 software. We used the GRADE criteria to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. Results A total of 411 studies were initially; 8 trials were eligible and were included in our analysis (N = 1386 participants). Regarding efficacy, there was no difference in changes in the PANSS total scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). In terms of safety, compared to risperidone, the incidence of serum prolactin increases and weight gain in the blonanserin group was lower (P

Abstract Background Blonanserin (BNS) had been undergoing post-market surveillance (PMS) since September 2018. Using the surveillance data, we did this analysis to assess the safety and effectiveness of different doses of BNS to explore a sufficient dose range of BNS in Chinese patients with schizophrenia (SZ). Methods A 12-week, prospective, observational, single-arm, multicenter, open-label PMS was conducted. In this analysis, we divided the patients from PMS into low, medium to high, and high dose groups based on the dose of BNS they received, with medium to high dose group being the focus. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores at week 2 or 4, 6 or 8, and 12 were calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of BNS in improving psychiatric symptoms. The safety of BNS was reported as the incidence of adverse drug reactions. Results 364 patients were included in the medium to high dose group, of which 321 completed the surveillance, with a dropout rate of 11.8%. The mean daily dose was 15.1 ± 1.92 mg. The BPRS total score was 50.1 ± 11.95 at baseline and decreased to 26.6 ± 7.43 at 12 weeks (P

Background: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of blonanserin and risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia and to provide reliable pharmacotherapeutic evidence for in the clinical treatment of schizophrenia. Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases for head-to-head randomized controlled trials that compared blonanserin with risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia. We extracted the following data: author, year, country, diagnostic criteria, sample size, course of treatment, dosage and outcomes. Our main endpoint was the changes in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores. Meta-analysis of the included data was conducted by RevMan 5.3 software. We used the GRADE criteria to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. Results: A total of 411 studies were initially; 8 trials were eligible and were included in our analysis (N = 1386 participants). Regarding efficacy, there was no difference in changes in the PANSS total scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). In terms of safety, compared to risperidone, the incidence of serum prolactin increases and weight gain in the blonanserin group was lower (P<0.05), but the incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) was higher (P<0.05). Conclusion: The efficacy of blonanserin is similar to that of risperidone, but it is unclear whether blonanserin is more effective than risperidone at improving cognitive and social function. More high-quality studies are needed to verify the efficacy and safety of blonanserin in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Blonanserin (BNS) had been undergoing post-market surveillance (PMS) since September 2018. Using the surveillance data, we did this analysis to assess the safety and effectiveness of different doses of BNS to explore a sufficient dose range of BNS in Chinese patients with schizophrenia (SZ). Methods: A 12-week, prospective, observational, single-arm, multicenter, open-label PMS was conducted. In this analysis, we divided the patients from PMS into low, medium to high, and high dose groups based on the dose of BNS they received, with medium to high dose group being the focus. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores at week 2 or 4, 6 or 8, and 12 were calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of BNS in improving psychiatric symptoms. The safety of BNS was reported as the incidence of adverse drug reactions. Results: 364 patients were included in the medium to high dose group, of which 321 completed the surveillance, with a dropout rate of 11.8%. The mean daily dose was 15.1 ± 1.92 mg. The BPRS total score was 50.1 ± 11.95 at baseline and decreased to 26.6 ± 7.43 at 12 weeks (P < 0.001). When compared with other groups, the median to high dose group achieved significantly more reduction in BPRS score at week 12 (P = 0.004 versus low dose and P = 0.033 versus higher dose). Extrapyramidal symptoms [EPS (46.4%)] were the most common adverse reactions in the medium to high group. The average weight gain during the surveillance was 0.5 ± 2.56 kg and prolactin elevation occurred in 2.2% patients. Most adverse reactions were mild. Conclusions: BNS at medium to high doses (mean 15.1 mg/d) significantly improved symptoms of SZ and was well-tolerated. Most ADRs were mild, and the likelihood of causing metabolic side effects and prolactin elevations was low. Medium to high dose of BNS is a more potent treatment choice for SZ. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2100048734. Date of registration: 2021/07/15 (retrospectively registered). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The environmental disturbances in a critical neurodevelopmental period exert organizational effects on brain intrinsic plasticity including excitatory and inhibitory (E/I) neurotransmission those can cause the onset of psychiatric illness. We previously reported that treatment of neural precursor cells with N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist MK-801 induced reduction of GABAergic interneuron differentiation, and these changes recovered by atypical antipsychotic blonanserin treatment in vitro. However, it remains unclear how this treatment affects neural circuit changes in hippocampus and amygdala, which might contribute to the prevention of onset process of schizophrenia. To elucidate the pathogenic/preventive mechanisms underlying prenatal environmental adversity-induced schizophrenia in more detail, we administered poly (I:C) followed by antipsychotics and examined alterations in social/cognitive behaviors, GABA/glutamate-related gene expressions with cell density and E/I ratio, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Bdnf) transcript levels, particularly in limbic areas. Treatment with antipsychotic blonanserin ameliorated impaired social/cognitive behaviors and increased parvalbumin (PV)-positive (+) cell density and its mRNA levels as well as Bdnf with long 3′UTR mRNA levels, particularly in the dorsal hippocampus, in rats exposed to maternal immune activation (MIA). Low dose of blonanserin and haloperidol altered GABA and glutamate-related mRNA levels, the E/I ratio, and Bdnf long 3′UTR mRNA levels in the ventral hippocampus and amygdala, but did not attenuate behavioral impairments. These results strongly implicate changes in PV expression, PV(+) GABAergic interneuron density, and Bdnf long 3′UTR expression levels, particularly in the dorsal hippocampus, in the pathophysiology and treatment responses of MIA-induced schizophrenia and highlight the therapeutic potential of blonanserin for developmental stress-related schizophrenia. • Blonanserin (Blon) exerts recovery effect against social dysfunction in developmental adversity caused by MIA.. • Blon also increases Bdnf with long 3' UTR (Bdnf long) mRNA in d-Hip in effective dose. • Lower dose of Blon increases GABA related/Bdnf long genes and decreases E/I ratio in v-Hip, without behavioral effect. • Modulation of PV(+) cells and trophic mechanisms in d-Hip can be expected for therapeutic intervention in schizophrenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Catatonia is a syndrome that may present with stupor, immobility, and postural retention, and appears in various primary disorders including schizophrenia, depressive disorders, and neurodevelopmental disorders. Case presentation In this report, we describe a 34‐year‐old female patient with schizophrenia, who had previously been treated with antipsychotic agents to improve psychotic symptoms with delusional symptoms and catatonia. However, she relapsed with catatonic symptoms around 1 year after she voluntarily discontinued the prescribed antipsychotic medications by herself. Her catatonia was successfully improved using the transdermal blonanserin patch, a drug formulation globally first approved in Japan in 2019. Discussion Although benzodiazepines or electroconvulsive therapy have been recommended as the first‐line treatment of catatonic manifestation observed in psychiatric patients, this patient responded well to antipsychotic blonanserin. From the differential drug responses, catatonia may be the complex of heterogeneous conditions with different pathophysiologies.

Abstract Background A post-marketing surveillance of blonanserin has been ongoing since September 2018. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of oral blonanserin in Chinese young and middle-aged female patients with schizophrenia in real clinical settings, using the data from the post-marketing surveillance. Methods A 12-week, prospective, multi-center, open-label, post-marketing surveillance was conducted. Female patients aged 18–40 years were included in this analysis. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) was used to evaluate the effectiveness of blonanserin in improving psychiatric symptoms. The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) such as of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), prolactin elevation and the weight gain were used to evaluate the safety profile of blonanserin. Results A total of 392 patients were included both in the safety and full analysis sets, 311 patients completed the surveillance protocol. The BPRS total score was 48.8 ± 14.11 at the baseline, decreasing to 25.5 ± 7.56 at 12 weeks (P

Background: Catatonia is a syndrome that may present with stupor, immobility, and postural retention, and appears in various primary disorders including schizophrenia, depressive disorders, and neurodevelopmental disorders. Case presentation: In this report, we describe a 34‐year‐old female patient with schizophrenia, who had previously been treated with antipsychotic agents to improve psychotic symptoms with delusional symptoms and catatonia. However, she relapsed with catatonic symptoms around 1 year after she voluntarily discontinued the prescribed antipsychotic medications by herself. Her catatonia was successfully improved using the transdermal blonanserin patch, a drug formulation globally first approved in Japan in 2019. Discussion: Although benzodiazepines or electroconvulsive therapy have been recommended as the first‐line treatment of catatonic manifestation observed in psychiatric patients, this patient responded well to antipsychotic blonanserin. From the differential drug responses, catatonia may be the complex of heterogeneous conditions with different pathophysiologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A post-marketing surveillance of blonanserin has been ongoing since September 2018. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of oral blonanserin in Chinese young and middle-aged female patients with schizophrenia in real clinical settings, using the data from the post-marketing surveillance. Methods: A 12-week, prospective, multi-center, open-label, post-marketing surveillance was conducted. Female patients aged 18–40 years were included in this analysis. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) was used to evaluate the effectiveness of blonanserin in improving psychiatric symptoms. The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) such as of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), prolactin elevation and the weight gain were used to evaluate the safety profile of blonanserin. Results: A total of 392 patients were included both in the safety and full analysis sets, 311 patients completed the surveillance protocol. The BPRS total score was 48.8 ± 14.11 at the baseline, decreasing to 25.5 ± 7.56 at 12 weeks (P < 0.001, compared with baseline). EPS (20.2%) including akathisia, tremor, dystonia, and parkinsonism were found as the most frequent ADRs. The mean weight gain was 0.27 ± 2.5 kg at 12 weeks from the baseline. Four cases (1%) of prolactin elevation were observed during the period of surveillance. Conclusion: Blonanserin significantly improved the symptoms of schizophrenia in female patients aged 18–40 years; the drug was well tolerated and had a low tendency to cause metabolic side effects, including prolactin elevation in these patients. Blonanserin might be a reasonable drug for the treatment of schizophrenia in young and middle-aged female patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reformulating poorly water-soluble drugs as supersaturated lipid-based formulations achieves higher drug loading and potentially improves solubilisation and bioavailability. However, for the weak base blonanserin, silica solidified supersaturated lipid-based formulations have demonstrated reduced in vitro solubilisation compared to their liquid-state counterparts. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the influence of supersaturated drug load on blonanserin solubilisation from liquid and silica solidified supersaturated self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (super-SNEDDS) during in vitro lipolysis. Stable liquid super-SNEDDS with varying drug loads (90–300% of the equilibrium solubility) were solidified by imbibition into porous silica microparticles (1:1 lipid: silica ratio). In vitro lipolysis revealed greater blonanserin solubilisation from liquid super-SNEDDS compared to solid at equivalent drug saturation levels, owing to strong silica-BLON/lipid interactions, evidenced by a significant decrease in blonanserin solubilisation upon addition of silica to a digesting liquid super-SNEDDS. An increase in solid super-SNEDDS drug loading led to increased solubilisation, owing to the increased drug:silica and drug:lipid ratios. Solidifying SNEDDS with silica enables the fabrication of powdered formulations with higher blonanserin loading and greater stability than liquid super-SNEDDS, however at the expense of drug solubilisation. These competing parameters need careful consideration in designing optimal super-SNEDDS for pre-clinical and clinical application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To prepare a PLGA microsphere loaded with the antipsychotic Blonanserin without release leg period and released in a near-zero model for long time, in this study, 15 kDa and 75 kDa PLGA were chosen to be mixed with different ratios, and Blonanserin microspheres (Bn-MS) without significant differences in the particle size, drug loading capacity, and encapsulation rate were prepared by microfluidics. The release kinetic model was fitted to the release behavior by monitoring the changes in particle size and morphology during the Bn-MS release to investigate microspheres' in vitro release pattern. The results showed that the addition of appropriate ratios of mixed molecular weights to Bn-MS could eliminate the release hysteresis period. When the ratio of 15 kDa and 75 kDa was 1:9 (F3), the Bn-MS had a low burst release rate, moderate release rate, no release hysteresis period, a long release period of up to 35 days, and a stable release pattern close to the zero level. The results of the release mechanism study indicated that the hybrid PLGA improved the release behavior of the microspheres by adjusting the dissolution degradation rate of Bn-MS, which in turn affected the release mechanism of the microspheres., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Blonanserin (BNS) is a well-tolerated and effective drug for treating schizophrenia., Aim: To investigate which types of patients would obtain the most benefit from BNS treatment., Methods: A total of 3306 participants were evaluated in a 12-week, prospective, multicenter, open-label post-marketing surveillance study of BNS. Brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) scores were calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of BNS, and its safety was assessed with the incidence of adverse drug reactions. Linear regression was used to screen the influencing factors for the reduction of BPRS total score, and logistic regression was used to identify patients with a better response to BNS., Results: The baseline BPRS total score (48.8 ± 15.03) decreased to 27.7 ± 10.08 at 12 weeks ( P < 0.001). Extrapyramidal symptoms (14.6%) were found to be the most frequent adverse drug reactions. The acute phase, baseline BPRS total score, current episode duration, number of previous episodes, dose of concomitant antipsychotics, and number of types of sedative-hypnotic agents were found to be independent factors affecting the reduction of BPRS total score after treatment initiation. Specifically, patients in the acute phase with baseline BPRS total score ≥ 45, current episode duration < 3 months, and ≤ 3 previous episodes derived greater benefit from 12-week treatment with BNS., Conclusion: Patients in the acute phase with more severe symptoms, shorter current episode duration, fewer previous episodes, and a lower psychotropic drug load derived the greatest benefit from treatment with BNS., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: Hai-Yun Li is an employee of Sumitomo Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. The other authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article., (©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Blonanserin is approved for treating schizophrenia in Japan, South Korea, India, and China. We aimed to synthesize the efficacy and tolerability of blonanserin compared to other antipsychotics., Methods: A systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis were conducted using the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's study-based trial register until January 24, 2024. We included open and blinded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving schizophrenia patients, with studies lasting at least 3 weeks. Primary outcomes focused on overall schizophrenia symptoms using rating scales and relapse rates. Secondary outcomes included symptom subtypes, treatment response, dropout rates, quality of life, and side effects, analyzed using standardized mean difference (SMD), mean difference (MD), and risk ratio (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). The review protocol was published in Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/e7jfa/)., Results: Fourteen acute-phase studies with 2697 participants compared blonanserin to olanzapine, haloperidol, risperidone, paliperidone, aripiprazole, amisulpride, and placebo. Blonanserin showed greater efficacy than placebo (SMD = -0.47, 95 % CI: -0.66 to -0.27) and similar efficacy to other antipsychotics in reducing schizophrenia overall symptoms. No data on the number of participants who experienced relapse with blonanserin was available in the single maintenance-phase study. There were also no clear differences between antipsychotics in most secondary efficacy outcomes, but blonanserin produced less prolactin and weight increase but more akathisia and tremor than risperidone, and less prolactin increase, anticholinergic and extrapyramidal side-effects than haloperidol., Conclusion: Our study suggests that differences in efficacy between blonanserin and other antipsychotics are small and that blonanserin has a different tolerability profile than haloperidol and risperidone., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest In the last three years, SL has received honoraria for advising/consulting and/or for lectures and/or for educational material from Angelini, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai, Ekademia, Gedeon Richter, Janssen, Karuna, Kynexis, Lundbeck, Medichem, Medscape, Mitsubishi, Otsuka, NovoNordisk, Recordati, Rovi, Teva. NN has received manuscript fees from Sumitomo Pharma. All other authors have no interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Öz: Amaçlar: Antipsikotik ilaçların yaygın olarak cinsel işlev bozukluğu ile ilişkili olduğu bilinmektedir. Ancak atipik antipsikotik ilaçların bu etkilerine ilişkin çalışmalar oldukça sınırlıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, fare vas deferensinin serotonin (5-HT), noradrenalin (NA), adenozin trifosfat (ATP) ve potasyum klorür (KCl) ile indüklenen kasılmaları üzerine siyamemazin, blonanserin ve nemonaprid'in etkilerini araştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada erkek kendi içinde yetiştirilmiş fareler kullanılmıştır. Fareler rastgele deney gruplarına (n=7) şu şekilde ayrıldı: salin; siyamemazin 0,25 mg/kg; siyamemazin 0,50 mg/kg; blonanserin 0,5 mg / kg; blonanserin 1 mg/kg; nemonaprid 0,5 mg / kg; nemonaprid 1 mg / kg. Farelere, 21 gün boyunca ilaçlar intraperitoneal olarak uygulandı. 21 gün boyunca %0.9 salin alan fareler kontrol grubunu oluşturdu. 21 günlük tedaviden sonra, ilaçların etkileri, fare vas deferensinin epididimal ve prostatik bölümlerine 5-HT, NA, ATP ve KCl'nin neden olduğu kasılma tepkileri araştırıldı. Bulgular: Siyamemazin ve blonanserin ile tedavi edilen fare vas deferenslerinin hem epididimal ve hem de prostatik kısımlarında, 5-HT ile indüklenen kasılma tepkileri anlamlı bir şekilde arttı. Ayrıca, siyamemazin, blonanserin ve nemonaprid uygulanan fare vas deferenslerinin prostatik ve epididimal kısımları; NA, ATP, KCl ile indüklenen kasılmaları önemli ölçüde değiştirmedi. Sonuçlar: Bu sonuçlar, vas deferens'in serotonin kaynaklı kasılmalarının, kronik siyamemazin ve blonanserin tedavilerinden etkilendiğini, ancak nemonapridden etkilenmediğini gösterdi. Ancak bu ilaçların NA, ATP ve KCl ile indüklenen kasılmalar üzerinde önemli bir etkisi yoktu. Serotonerjik reseptörler, kronik ciamemazin ve blonanserin tedavisi gören farelerde vas deferens kasılmalarındaki değişikliklere katkıda bulunabilir. Bu nedenle, sonuçlarımız, siyamemazin ve blonanserin'in neden olduğu cinsel işlev bozukluğunun nedenlerinden birini açıklayabilir.

Schizophrenia is an unexplained, complex and serious mental illness. Blonanserin (BNS) is a new antipsychotic drug widely used in the treatment of schizophrenia. However, large-scale clinical studies have not been conducted in China. A multi-center, prospective, open-label, 12-week surveillance was carried out to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of BNS in patients with schizophrenia in China. Safety assessments included adverse drug reactions (ADRs), extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), akathisia, concomitant medications for EPS by the end of treatment, and the changes in body weight from baseline by the end of treatment. The effectiveness was evaluated by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). From September 2018 to May 2020, of the 1,060 patients enrolled, 1,018 were included in the full analysis set (FAS) and safety set (SS), respectively. ADRs were developed in 205 patients among the included, the incidence being 20.1%. ADRs of EPS occurred in 169 patients, the incidence being 16.6%, ADRs of akathisia occurred in 90 patients, the incidence being 8.8%; concomitant therapeutic and prophylactic agents for EPS accounts for 19.2%; 4.0% of patients had a =7% increase in body weight from baseline at 12 weeks after initiating treatment. Using the last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) method, the changes in total BPRS scores were -11.2 ± 10.17 (N = 1,018), -16.8 ± 12.69 (N = 1,018) and -20.6 ± 13.99 (N = 1,018) after 2/4, 6/8, or 12 weeks, respectively. 53.5% (545/1,018) patients showed response to blonanserin treatment in week 12. The post-marketing surveillance results of BNS demonstrates safety profile and effectiveness of the drug. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract In general, the course of schizophrenia is chronic accompanied not only by positive and negative symptoms but also by cognitive dysfunction associated with psychosocial disability, and thus treatment combining antipsychotics and psychological therapy is considered promising. This review focused on two prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 long-term studies for approval of oral blonanserin for the treatment of schizophrenia. These two studies included both inpatients and outpatients with variable disease duration or symptom prominence according to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The selected two studies consisted of almost the same study schedule and eligibility criteria but different protocols regarding prior medications and concomitant antipsychotics. The proportion of patients who had a baseline PANSS negative score higher than the positive score was 82.2 and 67.2% in the two studies. In both studies, patients with an illness duration of ≥ 10 years were the most common. Based on the clinical symptoms at baseline, the physician determined the treatment: blonanserin monotherapy, blonanserin in combination with the existing antipsychotic medication, or therapy simplified to haloperidol together with blonanserin. The 28-week completion rate for long-term blonanserin treatment was high in both studies (82.2 and 78.7%). The types of adverse events in both studies were similar to those in the preceding 8-week randomized, active-controlled studies in Japan, which were included in the application package for the approval of oral blonanserin for patients with schizophrenia. Long-term blonanserin use did not increase the risk of extrapyramidal symptoms but reduced the dose of antiparkinsonian drugs, minimally affecting functioning. In both studies, the PANSS total score, positive score, and negative score were improved at the last observation carried forward compared with those at baseline. In conclusion, blonanserin is useful for long-term treatment of chronic schizophrenic patients when the appropriate management of clinical symptoms and adverse drug reactions are applied. Blonanserin might represent a promising treatment option that partially or completely relieves patients with chronic schizophrenia of polypharmacy. Blonanserin may possibly fit both the current real-world clinical setting and the currently recommended approach to antipsychotic medication.

Abstract Background Since antipsychotics induce hyperprolactinemia via the dopamine D2 receptor, long-term administration may be a risk factor for developing breast tumors, including breast cancer. On the other hand, some antipsychotic drugs have been reported to suppress the growth of breast cancer cells in vitro. Thus, it is not clear whether the use of antipsychotics actually increases the risk of developing or exacerbating breast tumors. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of antipsychotic drugs on the onset and progression of breast tumors by analyzing an adverse event spontaneous reporting database and evaluating the proliferation ability of breast cancer cells. Methods Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER) reports from April 2004 to April 2019 were obtained from the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) website. Reports of females only were analyzed. Adverse events included in the analysis were hyperprolactinemia and 60 breast tumor-related preferred terms. The reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and information component (IC) were used to detect signals. Furthermore, MCF-7 cells were treated with haloperidol, risperidone, paliperidone, sulpiride, olanzapine and blonanserin, and cell proliferation was evaluated by WST-8 assay. Results In the JADER analysis, the IC signals of hyperprolactinemia were detected with sulpiride (IC, 3.73; 95% CI: 1.81–5.65), risperidone (IC, 3.69; 95% CI: 1.71–5.61), and paliperidone (IC, 4.54; 95% CI: 2.96–6.12). However, the IC signal of breast tumors was not observed with any antipsychotics. In cell-based experiments, MCF-7 cells were treated with six antipsychotics at concentrations of 2 and 32 μM, and none of the drugs showed any growth-promoting effects on MCF-7 cells. On the other hand, blonanserin markedly suppressed the growth of MCF-7 cells at a concentration of 32 μM, and the effect was concentration dependent. Conclusions Analysis of the JADER using the IC did not show breast tumor signals due to antipsychotic drugs. In in vitro experiments, antipsychotics did not promote MCF-7 cell proliferation whereas blonanserin suppressed MCF-7 cell growth. Further research on the effects of blonanserin on the onset and progression of breast tumor is expected.

Schizophrenia significantly limits social functioning with positive and negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction. Blonanserin (LONASEN®), a novel second-generation antipsychotic approved for treating schizophrenia in Japan in 2008, reportedly shows beneficial effects on cognitive function as well as positive and negative symptoms, with potential for improving social functioning. To understand the safety and effectiveness of blonanserin in the real clinical practice, five Japanese post-marketing surveillances have been conducted and published to date. In this article, we reviewed all the Japanese post-marketing surveillances and discussed the clinical usefulness of blonanserin in patients with schizophrenia having diverse clinical characteristics. Adverse drug reactions, such as akathisia and extrapyramidal symptoms, were common in all surveillances. However, those specific to second-generation antipsychotics, such as weight gain and abnormalities in glycometabolism or lipid metabolism, were rarely observed. In addition, no adverse drug reactions apart from clinical trial results were found. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total scores in all surveillances significantly lowered at the last evaluation than at baseline. These results were consistent through 1-year of treatment, suggesting that effectiveness is maintained even after long-term use. In conclusion, blonanserin is considered a beneficial drug in real clinical practice for patients with schizophrenia having diverse characteristics.

Objectives: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety/tolerability of oral blonanserin in adolescents with schizophrenia (Study registration number: JapicCTI-111725). Methods: This 52-week, multicenter, open-label extension study enrolled adolescent patients with schizophrenia who opted to enter in this study after the completion of the preceding placebo-controlled study. Blonanserin tablet was orally administered twice daily, after morning and evening meals, for 52 weeks using dose-titration method within a range between 4 and 24 mg/day. The primary end point was the change from baseline to the end of the study in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. Safety/tolerability was assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events. Results: Of 117 patients who completed the preceding placebo-controlled study, 109 entered this extension study and 43 (39.4%) of them discontinued the study treatment. The safety analysis set comprised 106 patients who received the study drug at least once, including 36 and 70 patients treated with placebo (DB-placebo group) and blonanserin tablet (DB-blonanserin group), respectively, in the placebo-controlled study. At the last assessment, the mean change in PANSS total score overall [mean (standard deviation)] was -24.9 (20.76) from the baseline of the placebo-controlled study, which was similar in the DB-placebo and DB-blonanserin groups. The overall incidence of adverse events was 90.6%, and most of them were mild or moderate in severity, with similar incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (38.7%) to that in adults receiving long-term blonanserin oral tablet treatment and minimal change in weight and metabolic parameters. Conclusions: This long-term extension study showed that 52 weeks of oral blonanserin treatment improved or stabilized psychiatric symptoms in patients with adolescent schizophrenia. There were no major issues with the safety or tolerability of blonanserin administration in this study. Considering relatively less adverse effects on weight increase and metabolic parameters, blonanserin is expected to be a safe/tolerable treatment option for adolescent schizophrenia that can be used seamlessly from adolescence to adulthood. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of blonanserin in adolescents with schizophrenia. Methods: This 6-week multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study investigated fixed-dose blonanserin (8 or 16 mg/day) in patients 12-18 years of age diagnosed with schizophrenia, as indicated by a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of 60-120 and a Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score of ≥3. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 6 in the PANSS total score, using a mixed model for repeated measures analysis. Safety was assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). Results: Among 151 randomized patients, 150 were included in the primary analysis population. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar across groups at baseline. The rate of study discontinuation was 14.9%, 23.5%, and 28.3% in patients administered with placebo, blonanserin 8 mg/day, and blonanserin 16 mg/day, respectively. The least-squares mean change (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline to week 6 in PANSS total score was -10.6 (-16.10 to -5.10), -15.3 (-20.80 to -9.86), and -20.5 (-25.89 to -15.16) in patients administered placebo, 8 mg/day blonanserin, and 16 mg/day blonanserin, respectively. The 16-mg/day blonanserin group showed significantly greater reduction in the PANSS total score than the placebo group (least-squares mean difference [95% CI]: -9.9 [-17.61 to -2.25], p = 0.012, effect size: 0.538), although the 8-mg/day group showed no significant difference. The incidence of AEs such as akathisia, somnolence, and hyperprolactinemia was higher in the blonanserin groups than in the placebo group. AEs associated with blonanserin were generally mild and were consistent with its known profile in adults with schizophrenia. Conclusions: Blonanserin achieved a sufficient efficacy in adolescent patients, and the safety profile was similar to that in adults, which suggests that blonanserin may be a safe treatment option for adolescents with schizophrenia. Study registration number: Japic CTI-111724. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background We report a case of Meige’s syndrome induced by an atypical antipsychotic (blonanserin) that presented with refractory dry eye disease. Case presentation A 37-year-old woman with a 6-month history of foreign body sensation in the eyes and difficulty in opening her eyes was treated at a local clinic for dry eye disease. Despite this treatment, her symptoms did not improve and she was transferred to our attention. Our assessment revealed involuntary movements of her eyelids accompanied by repetitive pursing of her lips. She had been undergoing treatment with blonanserin for 5 years for schizophrenia. She was diagnosed with drug-induced Meige’s syndrome after a psychiatric and neurological consultation. After a 2-month gradual dose reduction and discontinuing blonanserin, involuntary movements of the eyelids with oromandibular dystonia were resolved. Three months after discontinuing blonanserin, there was no recurrence of symptoms, and she had no exacerbation of psychotic symptoms. Conclusions In patients with refractory dry eye disease, especially those with involuntary movements of the eyelids with oromandibular dystonia, it is important to ask about their psychotropic medications and to consider the possibility of drug-induced Meige’s syndrome and discontinuation of medications, if possible.

Abstract Objective To report the efficacy and safety of blonanserin in patients with schizophrenia compared with risperidone in a Japanese multicenter, randomized, double‐blind study based on post hoc sensitivity analysis in addition to the previous results reported by Miura and discuss the current approaches for schizophrenia treatment. Methods Of 302 patients randomized, 156 received blonanserin (8‐24 mg/d) and 145 received risperidone (2‐6 mg/d) for 8 weeks. Efficacy variables included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score for the primary outcome, PANSS subscale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and Clinical Global Impression‐Improvement (CGI‐I) for secondary outcomes. Safety variables included treatment‐emergent adverse events, Drug Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale scores, laboratory data, vital signs, electrocardiogram, etc Results Blonanserin was not inferior to risperidone in the change in PANSS total score at a non‐inferior margin of −7 (intergroup difference, −0.46; 95% CI, −4.40 to 3.48). Post hoc analyses wholly supported the primary result. No major difference was found in the changes in BPRS scores and the improvement rate on CGI‐I between the drugs. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two drugs. Blonanserin was associated with a lower risk of prolactin increase, weight gain, and orthostatic hypotension compared with risperidone. However, blonanserin was associated with a higher incidence of akathisia and excitability compared with risperidone. Most of the adverse events were mild to moderate in severity with no specific events of predominant high severity in the both drugs. Conclusions Blonanserin exerted the similar efficacy to risperidone in both positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia with a lower risk of prolactin increase, weight gain, and orthostatic hypotension compared with risperidone. Blonanserin will serve as a favorable treatment option for schizophrenia in daily clinical practice.

Reformulating poorly water-soluble drugs as supersaturated lipid-based formulations achieves higher drug loading and potentially improves solubilisation and bioavailability. However, for the weak base blonanserin, silica solidified supersaturated lipid-based formulations have demonstrated reduced in vitro solubilisation compared to their liquid-state counterparts. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the influence of supersaturated drug load on blonanserin solubilisation from liquid and silica solidified supersaturated self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (super-SNEDDS) during in vitro lipolysis. Stable liquid super-SNEDDS with varying drug loads (90–300% of the equilibrium solubility) were solidified by imbibition into porous silica microparticles (1:1 lipid: silica ratio). In vitro lipolysis revealed greater blonanserin solubilisation from liquid super-SNEDDS compared to solid at equivalent drug saturation levels, owing to strong silica-BLON/lipid interactions, evidenced by a significant decrease in blonanserin solubilisation upon addition of silica to a digesting liquid super-SNEDDS. An increase in solid super-SNEDDS drug loading led to increased solubilisation, owing to the increased drug:silica and drug:lipid ratios. Solidifying SNEDDS with silica enables the fabrication of powdered formulations with higher blonanserin loading and greater stability than liquid super-SNEDDS, however at the expense of drug solubilisation. These competing parameters need careful consideration in designing optimal super-SNEDDS for pre-clinical and clinical application.

Copyright of Online Turkish Journal of Health Sciences (OTJHS) / Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi is the property of Oguz KARABAY and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In general, the course of schizophrenia is chronic accompanied not only by positive and negative symptoms but also by cognitive dysfunction associated with psychosocial disability, and thus treatment combining antipsychotics and psychological therapy is considered promising. This review focused on two prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 long-term studies for approval of oral blonanserin for the treatment of schizophrenia. These two studies included both inpatients and outpatients with variable disease duration or symptom prominence according to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The selected two studies consisted of almost the same study schedule and eligibility criteria but different protocols regarding prior medications and concomitant antipsychotics. The proportion of patients who had a baseline PANSS negative score higher than the positive score was 82.2 and 67.2% in the two studies. In both studies, patients with an illness duration of ≥ 10 years were the most common. Based on the clinical symptoms at baseline, the physician determined the treatment: blonanserin monotherapy, blonanserin in combination with the existing antipsychotic medication, or therapy simplified to haloperidol together with blonanserin. The 28-week completion rate for long-term blonanserin treatment was high in both studies (82.2 and 78.7%). The types of adverse events in both studies were similar to those in the preceding 8-week randomized, active-controlled studies in Japan, which were included in the application package for the approval of oral blonanserin for patients with schizophrenia. Long-term blonanserin use did not increase the risk of extrapyramidal symptoms but reduced the dose of antiparkinsonian drugs, minimally affecting functioning. In both studies, the PANSS total score, positive score, and negative score were improved at the last observation carried forward compared with those at baseline. In conclusion, blonanserin is useful for long-term treatment of chronic schizophrenic patients when the appropriate management of clinical symptoms and adverse drug reactions are applied. Blonanserin might represent a promising treatment option that partially or completely relieves patients with chronic schizophrenia of polypharmacy. Blonanserin may possibly fit both the current real-world clinical setting and the currently recommended approach to antipsychotic medication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Blonanserin is a second-generation atypical antipsychotic agent with potent affinity to dopamine D2 and D3 receptors and serotonin 5-HT2 A receptor,and with low or negligible affinity for adrenergic α1,serotonin5-HT2 C,histamine H1,and muscarinic M1 and M3 receptors.It is effective in both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia,and improves some domain of the cognitive symptoms and social functions of patients.Based on the evidences and clinical experiences of several Chinese and Japanese experts,the article aimed to provide a comprehensive,objective,and reasonable medication recommendation for clinical psychiatrists and help patients with schizophrenia to recover and return to society at the earliest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Blonanserin is an atypical antipsychotic drug with high affinity and selective antagonism for dopamine D2 and D3 and serotonin 5‐HT2A receptors. Blonanserin transdermal patch is the first transdermal formulation developed for the treatment of schizophrenia. The purpose of this population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis was to evaluate the characteristics of blonanserin pharmacokinetics after transdermal patch application, to estimate the daily fluctuation in blonanserin plasma concentration, and to evaluate the impact of patch application noncompliance to support usage in clinical settings. A total of 3747 plasma blonanserin concentrations from 9 clinical studies (93 healthy volunteers and 348 patients with schizophrenia) were used in the PPK analysis. The plasma concentration was predicted using the final PPK model, and dopamine D2 receptor occupancy was estimated on the basis of the results of a separately reported positron emission tomography study. A 2‐compartment, parallel zero‐order absorption with a lag time and first‐order elimination model was developed to describe the pharmacokinetics of blonanserin, including the change in absorption rate during patch application. The maximum/minimum ratio of plasma concentration was estimated as 1.10 at steady state, indicating minimal fluctuation. In the case of failure to remove the previous patch or a missing application, the increase or decrease in plasma concentration and dopamine D2 receptor occupancy was <20%. These results indicated that the plasma blonanserin concentration and dopamine D2 receptor occupancy were stable after blonanserin transdermal patch application, which may lead to improved tolerability during the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The objective of this retrospective chart review study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and tolerability of blonanserin treatment in individuals with schizophrenia. Patients and methods: We collected data from 28 (56%) antipsychotic-naïve subjects with first-episode (FE) schizophrenia and 22 subjects with relapsed schizophrenia treated with blonanserin. We investigated psychiatric hospitalization and medication discontinuation rates, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores, Clinical Global Impression–Severity (CGI-S) scale scores, body mass index (BMI) at baseline to endpoint and laboratory tests including serum prolactin, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), high-density lipoproteins (HDL), triglycerides (TG), and glucose. Additionally, we measured the differences between the two groups and overall changes in levels. Results: Thirty-one subjects received blonanserin for 3 years. Significant improvements in psychiatric symptoms from baseline to endpoint were observed individuals with schizophrenia who received blonanserin treatment. There were remarkable changes in PANSS and CGI-S scores between baseline and those measured after 3 years (p .05) in both groups. After 3 years of treatment, there was a statistically significant increase in TC and TG with only a minimal increase in BMI (p

Abstract Objective This Japanese, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind trial, evaluating the efficacy and safety of blonanserin compared with haloperidol in patients with schizophrenia, was previously published by Murasaki in the Japanese language. In this article, we present the results of the trial based on full analysis dataset instead of per protocol dataset formerly reported and discuss the findings in light of the latest knowledge of pharmacological treatment for schizophrenia. Methods A total of 265 patients were randomized to receive blonanserin (8 to 24 mg/d) or haloperidol (4 to 12 mg/d) twice daily for 8 weeks. Efficacy assessments included the Clinical Global Impressions—Improvement (CGI‐I) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Results Blonanserin was not inferior to haloperidol with a margin of 10% with respect to the improvement rate on CGI‐I at end of study (60.5% vs 50.0%, P

Rationale: Unlike other antipsychotics, our previous positron emission tomography (PET) study demonstrated that a single dose of blonanserin occupied dopamine D3 as well as dopamine D2 receptors in healthy subjects. However, there has been no study concerning the continued use of blonanserin. Objectives: We examined D2 and D3 receptor occupancies in patients with schizophrenia who had been treated with blonanserin. Methods: Thirteen patients with schizophrenia participated. PET examinations were performed on patients treated with clinical dosage of blonanserin or olanzapine alone. A crossover design was used in which seven patients switched drugs after the first scan, and PET examinations were conducted again. D2 and D3 receptor occupancies were evaluated by [11C]-(+)-PHNO. We used nondisplaceable binding potential (BPND) of 6 healthy subjects which we previously reported as baseline. To consider the effect of upregulation of D3 receptor by continued use of antipsychotics, D3 receptor occupancy by blonanserin in seven subjects who completed 2 PET scans were re-analyzed by using BPND of olanzapine condition as baseline. Results: Average occupancy by olanzapine (10.8 ± 6.0 mg/day) was as follows: caudate 32.8 ± 18.3%, putamen 26.3 ± 18.2%, globus pallidus − 33.7 ± 34.9%, substantia nigra − 112.8 ± 90.7%. Average occupancy by blonanserin (12.8 ± 5.6 mg/day) was as follows: caudate 61.0 ± 8.3%, putamen 55.5 ± 9.5%, globus pallidus 48.9 ± 12.4%, substantia nigra 34.0 ± 20.6%. EC50 was 0.30 ng/mL for D2 receptor for caudate and putamen (df = 19, p < 0.0001) and 0.70 ng/mL for D3 receptor for globus pallidus and substantia nigra (df = 19, p < 0.0001). EC50 for D3 receptor of blonanserin changed to 0.22 ng/mL (df = 13, p = 0.0041) when we used BPND of olanzapine condition as baseline. Conclusions: Our study confirmed that blonanserin occupied both D2 and D3 receptors in patients with schizophrenia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Since antipsychotics induce hyperprolactinemia via the dopamine D2 receptor, long-term administration may be a risk factor for developing breast tumors, including breast cancer. On the other hand, some antipsychotic drugs have been reported to suppress the growth of breast cancer cells in vitro. Thus, it is not clear whether the use of antipsychotics actually increases the risk of developing or exacerbating breast tumors. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of antipsychotic drugs on the onset and progression of breast tumors by analyzing an adverse event spontaneous reporting database and evaluating the proliferation ability of breast cancer cells. Methods: Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER) reports from April 2004 to April 2019 were obtained from the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) website. Reports of females only were analyzed. Adverse events included in the analysis were hyperprolactinemia and 60 breast tumor-related preferred terms. The reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and information component (IC) were used to detect signals. Furthermore, MCF-7 cells were treated with haloperidol, risperidone, paliperidone, sulpiride, olanzapine and blonanserin, and cell proliferation was evaluated by WST-8 assay. Results: In the JADER analysis, the IC signals of hyperprolactinemia were detected with sulpiride (IC, 3.73; 95% CI: 1.81–5.65), risperidone (IC, 3.69; 95% CI: 1.71–5.61), and paliperidone (IC, 4.54; 95% CI: 2.96–6.12). However, the IC signal of breast tumors was not observed with any antipsychotics. In cell-based experiments, MCF-7 cells were treated with six antipsychotics at concentrations of 2 and 32 μM, and none of the drugs showed any growth-promoting effects on MCF-7 cells. On the other hand, blonanserin markedly suppressed the growth of MCF-7 cells at a concentration of 32 μM, and the effect was concentration dependent. Conclusions: Analysis of the JADER using the IC did not show breast tumor signals due to antipsychotic drugs. In in vitro experiments, antipsychotics did not promote MCF-7 cell proliferation whereas blonanserin suppressed MCF-7 cell growth. Further research on the effects of blonanserin on the onset and progression of breast tumor is expected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Transdermal antipsychotic patch formulations offer potential benefits, including improved adherence. This study investigated the striatal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy with daily blonanserin transdermal patch application. Methods This open-label, phase II study enrolled 18 Japanese outpatients (20 to <65 years) with schizophrenia (DSM-IV-TR criteria; total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score <120 at screening) treated with blonanserin 8-mg or 16-mg tablets. Patients continued tablets for 2–4 weeks at their current dose and were then assigned to once-daily blonanserin patches (10/20/40/60/80 mg daily) for 2–4 weeks based on the oral dose. [11C]raclopride positron emission tomography scanning determined blonanserin striatal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints included assessment of receptor occupancy by dose, changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness-Severity scores, patient attitudes towards adherence, and patch adhesiveness. Results Of 18 patients who started the blonanserin tablet treatment period, 14 patients completed treatment. Mean D2 receptor occupancy for blonanserin tablets 8 mg/d (59.2%, n = 5) and 16 mg/d (66.3%, n = 9) was within the values for blonanserin patches: 10 mg/d (33.3%, n = 3), 20 mg/d (29.9%, n = 2), 40 mg/d (61.2%, n = 3), 60 mg/d (59.0%, n = 3), and 80 mg/d (69.9%, n = 3). Occupancy generally increased with increasing blonanserin dose for both formulations with the half maximal receptor occupancy for tablets and patches associated with doses of 6.9 mg/d and 31.9 mg/d, respectively. Diurnal variability in occupancy was lower during transdermal patch treatment than during tablet treatment. Blonanserin transdermal patches were well tolerated with no major safety concerns. Conclusions Blonanserin patches (40/80 mg/d) have lower diurnal variability in occupancy than blonanserin tablets (8/16 mg/d), and patches at doses of 40 mg/d and 80 mg/d appear to be a suitable alternative for blonanserin tablets at doses of 8 mg/d and 16 mg/d, respectively. Blonanserin patches represent a potential new treatment option for patients with schizophrenia. Trial registry JAPIC Clinical Trials Information registry (www.clinicaltrials.jp ; JapicCTI-No: JapicCTI-121914). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Neurosyphilis remains a diagnostic challenge in current psychiatric practice because of its pleomorphic psychiatric manifestations. Although neurosyphilis can present with a wide range of psychiatric symptoms, psychotic mania as its solitary manifestation is an unusual phenomenon. Case presentation A 46-year-old man, with no history of any psychiatric disorder, exhibited abruptly developed symptoms of psychotic mania. He was admitted to a psychiatric ward for further evaluation and treatment. Upon admission, his cognitive function was unimpaired, and the hyperactivity was not severe. Also, no abnormalities were found upon neurological examination and brain magnetic resonance imaging. He was initially diagnosed as bipolar disorder with psychotic features. On the 3rd day after admission, he was confirmed as having neurosyphilis by analysis of cerebrospinal fluid and treated with intravenous penicillin—in combination with blonanserin—an atypical antipsychotic drug. After 2 weeks of treatment, most of the symptoms had abated. Conclusions The present case emphasizes that patients presenting with atypical psychiatric manifestation should be screened for possible syphilis, particularly in the absence of previous psychiatric history, and suggests that combination of blonanserin with antibiotic therapy may be effective in the treatment of the manic and psychotic symptoms secondary to neurosyphilis.

Torsade de pointes (TdP) occurred in a long QT syndrome type 3 (LQT3) patient after switching perospirone to blonanserin. We studied how their electropharmacological effects had induced TdP in the LQT3 patient. Perospirone hydrochloride (n = 4) or blonanserin (n = 4) of 0.01, 0.1, and 1 mg/kg, i.v. was cumulatively administered to the halothane-anesthetized dogs over 10 min. The low dose of perospirone decreased total peripheral vascular resistance, but increased heart rate and cardiac output, facilitated atrioventricular conduction, and prolonged J–Tpeakc. The middle dose decreased mean blood pressure and prolonged repolarization period, in addition to those observed after the low dose. The high dose further decreased mean blood pressure with the reduction of total peripheral vascular resistance; however, it did not increase heart rate or cardiac output. It tended to delay atrioventricular conduction and further delayed repolarization with the prolongation of Tpeak–Tend, whereas J–Tpeakc returned to its baseline level. Meanwhile, each dose of blonanserin decreased total peripheral vascular resistance, but increased heart rate, cardiac output and cardiac contractility in a dose-related manner. J–Tpeakc was prolonged by each dose, but Tpeak–Tend was shortened by the middle and high doses. These results indicate that perospirone and blonanserin may cause the hypotension-induced, reflex-mediated increase of sympathetic tone, leading to the increase of inward Ca2+ current in the heart except that the high dose of perospirone reversed them. Thus, blonanserin may have more potential to produce intracellular Ca2+ overload triggering early afterdepolarization than perospirone, which might explain the onset of TdP in the LQT3 patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To report the efficacy and safety of blonanserin in patients with schizophrenia compared with risperidone in a Japanese multicenter, randomized, double‐blind study based on post hoc sensitivity analysis in addition to the previous results reported by Miura and discuss the current approaches for schizophrenia treatment. Methods: Of 302 patients randomized, 156 received blonanserin (8‐24 mg/d) and 145 received risperidone (2‐6 mg/d) for 8 weeks. Efficacy variables included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score for the primary outcome, PANSS subscale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and Clinical Global Impression‐Improvement (CGI‐I) for secondary outcomes. Safety variables included treatment‐emergent adverse events, Drug Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale scores, laboratory data, vital signs, electrocardiogram, etc Results: Blonanserin was not inferior to risperidone in the change in PANSS total score at a non‐inferior margin of −7 (intergroup difference, −0.46; 95% CI, −4.40 to 3.48). Post hoc analyses wholly supported the primary result. No major difference was found in the changes in BPRS scores and the improvement rate on CGI‐I between the drugs. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two drugs. Blonanserin was associated with a lower risk of prolactin increase, weight gain, and orthostatic hypotension compared with risperidone. However, blonanserin was associated with a higher incidence of akathisia and excitability compared with risperidone. Most of the adverse events were mild to moderate in severity with no specific events of predominant high severity in the both drugs. Conclusions: Blonanserin exerted the similar efficacy to risperidone in both positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia with a lower risk of prolactin increase, weight gain, and orthostatic hypotension compared with risperidone. Blonanserin will serve as a favorable treatment option for schizophrenia in daily clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clozapine, a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA), is a cause of side effects related to metabolic syndrome. The participation of serotonin 5-HT2C and histamine H1 receptors in the central nervous system has been reported as a mechanism of the weight gain caused by clozapine. In the present study, we investigated the direct pharmacological action of clozapine on the 3T3-L1 adipocytes and compared it to that of blonanserin, an SGA with low affinity for both receptors. Short-term exposure to clozapine decreased secretion and mRNA expression of leptin. Long-term exposure decreased leptin as well as adiponectin secretion, and further increased lipid droplets accumulation. However, short- and long-term exposures to blonanserin did not affect these parameters. A selective serotonin 5-HT2C, but not a histamine H1, receptor antagonist enhanced the decreased secretion of leptin induced by short-term exposure to clozapine, but did not affect the increased accumulation of lipid droplets. Our findings indicate that clozapine, but not blonanserin, strongly and directly affected the secretion of adipokines, such as leptin, in adipocytes and caused adipocyte enlargement.

Objectives: This clinical trial primarily aimed to investigate the effects of blonanserin on social functioning in patients with first-episode schizophrenia., Methods: In this prospective, multi-centre, single-arm clinical trial study, blonanserin (flexible oral dose ranging from 8mg to 24mg per day) was given 26 weeks. Outcome measures included the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale for evaluating social functioning, the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) for measuring neurocognitive performance, and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for assessing symptom severity. The primary endpoint was social function improvement evaluated by PSP scale at the end of blonanserin treatment. And the secondary endpoint was to validate the efficacy and neurocognitive effects of blonanserin. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were also recorded and analysed., Results: A total of 96 patients with first-episode schizophrenia were recruited and proceeded to analysis. Fifty-one participants (53.1%) completed the PSP scale measurements at baseline and week 26. Following 26 weeks of blonanserin treatment, all outcome measurements demonstrated significant improvement during the follow-up period. Notably, PSP scores exhibited a continuous increase up to 68.1% ± 103.7% at the end of the treatment (46.6 ± 14.6 at baseline, 69.4 ± 17.4 at week 26, p<0.001), indicating positive effects on social functioning that were already noticeable by week 8., Conclusion: Blonanserin treatment exhibited favourable effects on social functioning in individuals with first-episode schizophrenia. The results suggest that blonanserin was effective treatment options for patients with schizophrenia encountering functional impairments., Competing Interests: HL was employed by Sumitomo Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declare that this study received funding from Sumitomo Pharma (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. The funder had the following involvement in the study: conceptualization, methodology, analysis, and manuscript review & editing., (Copyright © 2024 Gao, Deng, Sheng, Wu, Liu, Yang, Wang, Hu, Wang, Li, Pu and Yu.)

Blonanserin differs from other antipsychotic drugs, such as risperidone and olanzapine, and exhibits a higher affinity for dopamine-D 2/3 receptors than for serotonin 5-HT 2A receptors. We investigated the involvement of dopamine-D 3 receptors in the effect of blonanserin on the social deficit observed in an animal model of schizophrenia and sought to elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying its action. Mice received phencyclidine (PCP: 10 mg/kg/day, s.c.), a non-competitive N -methyl- d -aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, once a day for 14 consecutive days. We then evaluated the sociability, using a social interaction test, and the expression of GluN1 subunit, an essential subunit of the NMDA receptors, in these mice. Blonanserin significantly ameliorated the PCP-induced social deficit, whereas olanzapine and haloperidol did not. This effect of blonanserin was antagonized by 7-OH-DPAT, a dopamine-D 3 receptor agonist, and SCH23390, a dopamine-D 1 receptor antagonist. However, the ameliorating effect of blonanserin was not inhibited by DOI, a serotonin 5-HT 2A receptor agonist. The PCP-induced social deficit was also ameliorated by U99194, a dopamine-D 3 receptor antagonist and SKF38393, a dopamine-D 1 receptor agonist, being effects antagonized by 7-OH-DPAT or SCH23390. Blonanserin significantly inhibited the decrease in the phosphorylation levels of GluN1 at Ser897 by protein kinase A (PKA) in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in PCP administered mice. These results suggest that activation of NMDA receptors due to Ser897-phosphorylation of GluN1 subunit, which is a step linked to dopamine-D 1 receptor-PKA signaling through dopamine-D 3 receptor antagonism in the PFC, is required for the ameliorating effect of blonanserin on the PCP-induced social deficit. These findings also provide in vivo evidence that blonanserin antagonism of the dopamine-D 3 receptors may be useful as a novel treatment strategy and that the dopamine-D 3 receptors can be a novel therapeutic target molecule for the social deficit observed in schizophrenia. • Blonanserin ameliorated phencyclidine-induced social deficit. • Ameliorating effect was mediated via dopamine-D 3 receptor antagonism. • Dopamine-D 3 receptor antagonism augmented dopaminergic neurotransmission. • The effect was due to functional activation of dopamine-D 1 -NMDA receptor pathway. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This Japanese, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind trial, evaluating the efficacy and safety of blonanserin compared with haloperidol in patients with schizophrenia, was previously published by Murasaki in the Japanese language. In this article, we present the results of the trial based on full analysis dataset instead of per protocol dataset formerly reported and discuss the findings in light of the latest knowledge of pharmacological treatment for schizophrenia. Methods: A total of 265 patients were randomized to receive blonanserin (8 to 24 mg/d) or haloperidol (4 to 12 mg/d) twice daily for 8 weeks. Efficacy assessments included the Clinical Global Impressions—Improvement (CGI‐I) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Results: Blonanserin was not inferior to haloperidol with a margin of 10% with respect to the improvement rate on CGI‐I at end of study (60.5% vs 50.0%, P < 0.001). The decrease in the PANSS total score did not differ between the drugs (−10.3 vs −7.1). For the PANSS negative symptom score, the decrease was significantly greater with blonanserin than with haloperidol (P = 0.006). Blonanserin was well tolerated. The incidence of adverse events was similar for the two drugs. Extrapyramidal adverse events, sedation, hypotension, and prolactin increase were rarer with blonanserin than with haloperidol. No clinically important weight gain was observed. Conclusions: Blonanserin is as effective as haloperidol for the treatment of schizophrenia. Blonanserin is more effective for negative symptoms with a lower risk of extrapyramidal symptoms compared with haloperidol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of blonanserin in schizophrenic patients who were previously treated with other antipsychotics but, due to insufficient response, were switched to blonanserin. Methods: A total of 52 patients with schizophrenia who were unresponsive to treatment with antipsychotic monotherapy or combination therapy were recruited into this 12-week, open-label, prospective, multicenter study. Patients were switched to blonanserin from their existing antipsychotics over a maximum 2-week tapering-off period. Efficacy was primarily evaluated using the 18-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Assessments were performed at baseline, and at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12. Results: Switching to blonanserin resulted in a significant decrease in the mean total score on the BPRS from baseline (56.8 ± 9.4) to week 12 (42.1 ± 13.8, p < 0.001). The most common adverse events were extrapyramidal symptoms (n = 12, 23.1%), insomnia (n = 10, 19.2%), and emotional arousal (n = 6, 11.5%). Overweight or obese patients (body mass index ≥ 23 kg/m², n = 33) who switched to blonanserin exhibited significant weight loss from 75.2 ± 9.3 kg at baseline to 73.5 ± 9.2 kg at week 12 (p = 0.006). The total cholesterol (baseline, 236.1 ± 47.6 mg/dl; endpoint [week 12], 209.9 ± 28.0 mg/dl; p = 0.005) and prolactin levels (baseline, 80.0 ± 85.2 ng/ml; endpoint [week 12], 63.2 ± 88.9 ng/ml; p = 0.003) were also significantly improved in patients with hypercholesterolemia or hyperprolactinemia. Conclusion: The results of the present study suggest that switching to blonanserin may be an effective strategy for schizophrenic patients unresponsive to other antipsychotic treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing blonanserin with other antipsychotics (amisulpride, aripiprazole, haloperidol, paliperidone, and risperidone). Methods Weighted mean difference (WMD), risk ratio, and number needed to harm (NNH) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using random-effects model. Results Ten RCTs (n = 1521) were included in this study. Blonanserin was superior to aripiprazole in improvement of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores (WMD = −10.62, 95% CI = −17.67 to −3.560, p = 0.003). Blonanserin was associated with a higher incidence of all-cause discontinuation (RR = 1.373, 95% CI = 1.088–1.734, p = 0.008, NNH = 11), akathisia, extrapyramidal disorder, and agitation/excitement and a lower risk of hyperprolactinemia compared with risperidone + paliperidone. Discussion The current meta-analytic study did not update the comparison of blonanserin vs. haloperidol because there were no new RCTs. Our results suggest that the efficacy of blonanserin for schizophrenia is comparable with that of other antipsychotics, and blonanserin seems to be well tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]