Search

Aim: To determine the prevalence of anxiety-depressive symptomatology and associated risk factors in a population of pregnant women in the low-income neighborhood of Roquetes (Barcelona, Spain)., Design: Quasi-experimental, cross-sectional study., Location: The study was carried out at the Primary Care Center, Roquetes Canteres, Barcelona., Participants: Between 2015 and 2017, all pregnant women who visited the Sexual and Reproductive Care Team in Primary Care (ASSIR) or their Family Physician (FP) were invited to take part in a study if they met the following criteria: (a) over 18 years old (b) able to understand in any of the 4 study languages. Of a total of 239 gestating women, 19 declined to participate, 14 moved away from the area and 16 underwent voluntary termination of pregnancy, leaving a sample of 190 subjects., Material and Methods: The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was used to detect depressive symptomatology, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was used to assess anxiety, and a sociodemographic data questionnaire was administered. Once all descriptive demographic data from the whole sample was analyzed, baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were compared using the independent t-test for continuous variables and the chi-squared analysis for categorical variables., Results: The t-test showed that 48% of pregnant women presented an at-risk degree of anxiety-depressive symptomatology, double that found in the general population. Applying a chi-squared test to the at-risk and non-risk groups revealed associated prenatal risk factors including: having a history of violence; living in a rented room, mistreatment in infancy and mental health issues. The ROC curves analysis obtained a cutoff point score of 4 Accumulated Associated Factors (AAF) (AUC 0.765, p  < .001, 57% sensitivity and 79% specificity)., Conclusions: Our study shows that rates of anxiety-depressive symptomatology in a population with considerable socio-economic deprivation can more than double. AAF in the population at risk of anxiety and depression were detected, highlighting the need to allocate resources to identification and prevention during pregnancy. This requires the involvement of a multidisciplinary, professional team with a biopsychosocial perspective.

Background: The aim of this study was to analyse trends in several health-related indicators in socioeconomically deprived neighbourhoods in Barcelona with strong community action for health (CA), and compare them to neighbourhoods without such community action. A secondary goal was to analyse trends in socioeconomic inequalities in health in both types of neighbourhood., Methods: We performed a quasi-experimental pre-post study using data from the Barcelona Health Surveys of 2001 and 2011. Our dependent variables were self-perceived health, mental health, previous drug use, and smoking cessation. We used Poisson regression with robust variance to calculate prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI)., Results: The percentage of men who had ever used drugs decreased over time in neighbourhoods with strong CA (PR = 0.48; 95% CI:0.25-0.92, from 2001 to 2011), but not in neighbourhoods without CA (PR = 1.02; 95% CI:0.74-1.40). However, the prevalence of poor mental health among men increased more in neighbourhoods with strong CA than in neighbourhoods without CA (p-value = 0.025). Among women, social class inequalities in poor mental health and smoking cessation decreased over time in neighbourhoods with strong CA but not in neighbourhoods without CA., Conclusions: Our study shows promising results regarding the effect of community action on health, particularly in terms of inequalities. Our results highlight the importance of allocating resources to implement and continuously evaluate CA initiatives., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is limited evidence on the efficacy and social utility of cognitive training. To address this, we have designed a randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of memory training workshops for healthy older people in terms of their short- and long-term impact on cognitive function, health-related quality of life, and functionality., Methods/design: A randomized controlled trial will be performed in health care centers in Barcelona (Spain) through comparison of a group of individuals participating in memory training workshops (experimental group) with another group with similar characteristics not participating in the workshops (control group). The intervention will consist of twelve 90-minute group sessions imparted once a week by a psychologist specialized in memory training. The groups will each comprise approximately 15 people, for a total number of 230 patients involved in the study. Each session has its own objectives, materials and activities. The content of the intervention is based on memory training from different perspectives, including cognitive and emotional aspects and social and individual skills. Data will be collected at baseline, at 3-4 months and at 6 months. To assess the efficacy of the intervention on cognitive function, health-related quality of life and functionality, a statistical analysis will be performed by fitting a repeated-measures mixed effects model for each main outcome: Self-perceived memory, measured by a Subjective Self-reported Memory Score (from 0 to 10) and by the Memory Failures in Everyday life questionnaire (MFE); Everyday memory, measured using the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test-3 (RBMT-3) and Executive control abilities, measured in terms of visual-perceptual ability, working memory and task-switching ability with the Trail Making Test (TMT) and with the digit span scale of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III (WAIS III)., Discussion: The results of this study will be highly useful for social and public health policies related to older people. Given the continuous increase in the prevalence of older people, a large number of interventions targeting memory loss are funded by public resources. To ensure transparency and effective prioritization, research such as the present study is needed to provide evidence of the effectiveness and usefulness of these interventions., Trial Registration: Number: NCT02431182 .