Search

ObjectivesVedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) are second-line treatments in pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory to antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. Pediatric studies comparing the effectiveness of these medications are lacking. Using a registry from ImproveCareNow (ICN), a global research network in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease, we compared the effectiveness of UST and VDZ in anti-TNF refractory UC.MethodsWe performed a propensity-score weighted regression analysis to compare corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFCR) at 6 months from starting second-line therapy. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of our findings to different ways of handling missing outcome data. Secondary analyses evaluated alternative proxies of response and infection risk.ResultsOur cohort included 262 patients on VDZ and 74 patients on UST. At baseline, the two groups differed on their mean pediatric UC activity index (PUCAI) (p = 0.03) but were otherwise similar. At Month 6, 28.3% of patients on VDZ and 25.8% of those on UST achieved CFCR (p = 0.76). Our primary model showed no difference in CFCR (odds ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-1.59) (p = 0.54). The time to biologic discontinuation was similar in both groups (hazard ratio: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.76-2.08) (p = 0.36), with the reference group being VDZ, and we found no differences in clinical response, growth parameters, hospitalizations, surgeries, infections, or malignancy risk. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings of similar effectiveness.ConclusionsUST and VDZ are similarly effective for inducing clinical remission in anti-TNF refractory UC in pediatric patients. Providers should consider safety, tolerability, cost, and comorbidities when deciding between these therapies.

Key points: Data on current practice patterns for the management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, including which medications are deemed by otolaryngologists to better manage patient symptoms, are limited.This study demonstrated that contemporary practice patterns are largely consistent with published clinical consensus statements.Off‐label nasal steroid irrigations and dupilumab are the most commonly used topical and systemic therapies for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metabolic disorders are common in patients with psoriasis and contribute significantly to an increased cardiovascular risk. While biologic therapy is very successful in clearing skin lesions, its impact on metabolic parameters is uncertain. Our aim was to investigate the residual metabolic burden in psoriasis patients successfully treated with biologic therapy. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 80 young patients (54 men, 26 women, aged 30–45 years) successfully treated with either adalimumab, secukinumab or guselkumab and topical therapy or methotrexate, and 20 healthy controls. Anthropometric parameters, lipid levels and metabolic indices (HOMA-IR, TyG index and FIB-4 index) were measured. Patients did not receive any other treatments to exclude confounding effects. After analysis, we found that patients treated with three different biologics had similar metabolic status, only the FIB-4 index was higher in the adalimumab group than in the secukinumab and guselkumab treatment groups. There were no significant differences between the patients treated with biologics and the control group. The comparison with patients treated topically or with methotrexate showed that only triglyceride levels, HOMA-IR, TyG index, and FIB-4 index were elevated in patients treated with adalimumab compared to patients treated with topical therapy. Finally, metabolic status was also similar in patients treated with methotrexate or topical therapy. In conclusion, this study suggests that psoriasis patients successfully treated with biologics have similar metabolic parameters to the control group and patients treated with topical therapy or methotrexate. This indicates that there is no significant residual metabolic burden in young patients successfully treated with biologics. These results are clinically relevant and should be considered in the treatment of psoriasis patients. The study is registered at (identifier: NCT05957120). Date of registration: 24th of July 2023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Serious infections (SIs) remain one of the most significant comorbidities in patients with inflammatory arthritides including psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Apart from methotrexate (MTX) and biologics such as tumor necrosis factor (TNFi), interleukin-12/23 (IL-12/23i), and IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), traditionally used for the treatment of PsA, recently biologics such as IL-23i and targeted synthetic agents like JAK inhibitors (JAKi) have been introduced in the daily clinical practice for the treatment of this disease. Although overall the incidence of SIs in patients with PsA treated with these agents is lower compared to patients with rheumatoid arthritis, still a number of unresolved issues regarding their safety remain. Current evidence is reassuring regarding the safety profile of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, such as MTX. The increased risk for reactivation of latent infections, such as tuberculosis and hepatitis B virus (HBV) with the use of TNFi, is well described; nevertheless, it is significantly ameliorated with the appropriate screening and prophylaxis. Regarding IL-12/23i and IL-17i, there are no significant safety signals, except from an increased incidence of usually mild Candida infections with the latter class. Newer biologics such as IL-23i and targeted synthetic agents like JAKi have been recently introduced in the daily clinical practice for the treatment of this disease. While IL-23i has not been shown to increase the risk for common or opportunistic infections, a well-established association of JAKi with herpes zoster warrants the attention of rheumatologists. In this narrative review, we summarize the infectious complications of available treatment options by drug class in patients with PsA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by abdominal pain, diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and weight loss. The pathogenesis and treatment of UC remain key areas of research interest. Various factors, including genetic predisposition, immune dysregulation, and alterations in the gut microbiota, are believed to contribute to the pathogenesis of UC. Current treatments for UC include 5-aminosalicylic acids, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and biologics. However, study reported that the one-year clinical remission rate is only around 40%. It is necessary to prompt the exploration of new treatment modalities. Biologic therapies, such as anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody and JAK inhibitor, primarily consist of small molecules targeting specific pathways, effectively inducing and maintaining remission. Given the significant role of the gut microbiota, research into intestinal microecologics, such as probiotics and prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) shows promising potential in UC treatment. Additionally, medicinal herbs, such as chili pepper and turmeric, used in complementary therapy have shown promising results in UC management. This article reviews recent findings on the mechanisms of UC, including genetic susceptibility, immune cell dynamics and cytokine regulation, and gut microbiota alterations. It also discusses current applications of biologic therapy, herbal therapy, microecologics, and FMT, along with their prospects and challenges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Factors such as obesity, alcohol consumption, and tobacco use are associated with both increased psoriasis severity and inadequate response to systemic and biologic therapies. Obesity is linked to chronic inflammation, which can contribute to psoriasis pathogenesis. Fixed-dose therapies may have reduced efficacy in patients with a higher body mass index, while weight-based dosing can increase the burden of drug-specific side effects. Alcohol and nicotine from tobacco have also been shown to stimulate keratinocyte and immune cell proliferation and production of proinflammatory cytokines. While these risk factors are prevalent among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, their influence on treatment outcomes may be overlooked when evaluating therapeutic options. Brodalumab is a fully human interleukin-17 receptor A antagonist approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. In this review, we describe the lifestyle-related risk factors associated with decreased response to treatment. We further summarize the post hoc analyses of brodalumab in participant subgroups with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and a history of prior biologic failure, obesity, and alcohol or tobacco use from two phase 3 clinical trials (AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3; ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01708603 and NCT01708629, respectively). Our review of clinical trial and real-world data suggests that brodalumab is an efficacious and safe treatment option for patients with lifestyle factors that increase the likelihood of treatment failure, allowing them to achieve skin clearance and improve quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Biologic therapies approved for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) have well‐established safety profiles but reports of rheumatic adverse events (AEs) are increasing and not well defined. This review aims to assess the risk and incidence of rheumatic AEs associated with biologic therapy in CRSwNP and summarize current reported management strategies. Methods: A protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42024525663]. A search was conducted in four electronic databases: Medline (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception until January 4, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened citations and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool. Data were pooled using a random effects model to calculate overall incidence and relative risk. Results: Twenty‐one studies met the final inclusion criteria, totaling 3434 patients of which 2763 (80%) received either dupilumab (n = 2257; 82%), mepolizumab (n = 372; 13%), or omalizumab (n = 134; 5%) for treatment of CRSwNP. The overall incidence rate for any on‐treatment rheumatic AE was 0.05 per person–year (95% CI, 0.03–0.09, I2 = 75%). Biologic therapy increased the risk of developing a rheumatic AE (RR = 2.53; 95% CI, 1.29–4.94) compared with placebo. The most frequently reported rheumatic AE was arthralgia or joint pain (n = 94; 95%), followed by lupus‐like syndrome or lupus erythematosus‐like reaction (n = 2; 2.5%). Discontinuation of treatment was the most common intervention (n = 21, 39%). Conclusion: Biologic therapy increases the risk of rheumatic AEs in CRSwNP patients by over twofold. Healthcare providers should remain vigilant in monitoring rheumatic AEs and apply appropriate management strategies on a case‐by‐case basis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key points: Unilateral or destructive sinonasal disease should raise suspicion for tumor.Patients receiving biologic therapy for CRSwNP should be carefully selected.Tissue diagnosis should be considered prior to starting biologics for nasal polyposis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The recent approval of Dupilumab has profoundly revolutionized the management of patients affected by severe and recalcitrant Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). However, a review that summarizes the results of real-life studies and compares them to phase 3 studies SINUS-24 and 52 is still lacking. Materials and methods: A search of all real-life studies published from 2019 to 2023 was performed. Patients characteristics at baseline and 6 and 12 months after starting Dupilumab were extracted and compared to those from phase 3 trials: age, sex, smoking habits, comorbid asthma and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), previous endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), hematic eosinophils and total IgE, NasalAQ2 Polyps Score (NPS), smell, SNOT-22, adverse events (AEs), and response to treatment. Results: 15 papers were included with an overall number of 1658 patients. A higher rate of comorbidities and previous ESS was found in patients from real-life studies. In addition, they had worse smell and SNOT-22 at baseline compared to patients from SINUS-24 and 52. Comorbid and post-ESS patients tended to have a faster NPS and SNOT-22 improvement, although the absolute values were not clinically relevant. A more extensive surgery and a number of ESS ≥ 2 were related to worse olfactory outcomes, probably due to iatrogenic damage. No correlation was found between hematic eosinophils and outcomes. AEs were reported by 12.4% of patients and 2.2% had to discontinue dupilumab. Weight gain was an emergent AE (0.8%), probably related to the restored sense of smell and taste. Non-responders were 3.5% and they were switched to systemic steroid, ESS, or another biologic. Conclusion: Despite some differences in prescription criteria between countries, dupilumab was demonstrated to be effective even in the real-life scenario. However, emerging AEs and possible unknown long-term AEs of a likely lifelong therapy should be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is challenging due to the absence of standardized guidelines and the lack of evidence-based, effective treatment options. Here, we performed a systematic review to summarize the use of biologics and their efficacy in the treatment of PG. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane electronic databases from their inception to September 22nd, 2022, and included 82 peer-reviewed studies with a total of 108 patients. Infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept were the most utilized biologic therapies in the treatment of PG in 64.8% (70/108), 16.7% (18/108), and 11.1% (12/108) of the cases, respectively. With respect to treatment response, 88.9% (96/108) of the patients achieved complete resolution of PG with biologic therapies. The average number of days to improvement and resolution of PG treated after starting biologic therapies was 30 and 161, respectively. PG recurred in 15.5% (11/71) of those reported the outcome. Our study suggests that biologic therapies may be an attractive therapeutic option for PG with an excellent efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Asthma is a chronic respiratory condition predominantly driven by a type 2 immune response. Epithelial-derived alarmins such as thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), interleukin (IL)-33, and IL-25 orchestrate the activation of downstream Th2 cells and group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s), along with other immune effector cells. While these alarmins are produced in response to inhaled triggers, such as allergens, respiratory pathogens or particulate matter, disproportionate alarmin production by airway epithelial cells can lead to asthma exacerbations. With alarmins produced upstream of the type 2 inflammatory cascade, understanding the pathways by which these alarmins are regulated and expressed is critical to further explore new therapeutics for the treatment of asthmatic patients. This review emphasizes the critical role of airway epithelium and epithelial-derived alarmins in asthma pathogenesis and highlights the potential of targeting alarmins as a promising therapeutic to improve outcomes for asthma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (IMIDs) are known to have an elevated risk of developing cancer, but the exact causative factors remain subject to ongoing debate. This narrative review aims to present the available evidence concerning the intricate relationship between these two conditions. Environmental influences and genetic predisposition lead to a dysregulated immune response resulting in chronic inflammation, which is crucial in the pathogenesis of IMIDs and oncogenic processes. Mechanisms such as the inflammatory microenvironment, aberrant intercellular communication due to abnormal cytokine levels, excessive reparative responses, and pathological angiogenesis are involved. The chronic immunosuppression resulting from IMIDs treatments further adds to the complexity of the pathogenic scenario. In conclusion, this review highlights critical gaps in the current literature, suggesting potential avenues for future research. The intricate interplay between IMIDs and cancer necessitates more investigation to deepen our understanding and improve patient management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this debate at the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2023 annual meeting, arguments were made contrasting the first-line use of oral targeted small-molecule drugs vs biologic therapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) after failure of conventional therapy. Arguments in favor of small-molecule drugs included good efficacy and safety, patient preference, cost savings, global health equity, and environmental stewardship. Arguments in favor of biologics included superior efficacy, excellent safety, availability of long-term data, pediatric regulatory approvals, and potential benefit for comorbidities. By the end of the debate, there was recognition of significant pros and cons of each approach. Both small-molecule drugs and biologic therapy are valuable options for PsO treatment, and their use can be tailored toward specific individuals or healthcare systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Apremilast is a relatively new oral treatment for psoriasis, which reduces expression of pro‐inflammatory factors, including tumour necrosis factor‐α (TNFα), critical to the immune control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. In randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for apremilast no new cases of active tuberculosis (TB) were identified, thus, screening for latent TB infection (LTBI) is not currently recommended prior to apremilast initiation. We describe a case of M.tuberculosis reactivation shortly after commencement of apremilast for psoriasis. We are recommending clinicians perform LTBI risk assessment in all patients, and appropriate LTBI screening in select populations prior to apremilast initiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are associated chronic inflammatory conditions with complex disease courses and potential for overlapping therapeutic management. We describe a case of severe pediatric HS and UC that were poorly controlled despite several standard‐of‐care therapies, including infliximab and ustekinumab. Transitioning the patient to upadacitinib monotherapy resulted in clinical improvement of both her UC and HS within 3 months, and she was then able to be weaned off her other systemic therapies. While upadacitinib is not currently FDA‐approved for HS or pediatric UC, this case report shows promise for upadacitinib monotherapy for both of these complex inflammatory disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ustekinumab (UST) is an effective treatment option in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it still remains unclear if therapeutic drug monitoring could be helpful to guide clinicians. Objectives: The aim of our study was to analyze the relationship between UST through levels (USTTL) and clinical outcomes in real-world inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Design: We performed a unicentric retrospective study including patients with IBD under UST treatment with at least one level determination. Methods: The following variables were analyzed at the initiation of UST and at each USTTL measurement: clinical response and remission using the Harvey–Bradshaw Index (HBI) for CD and the Partial Mayo Score (pMayo) for UC; biochemical response and remission using fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein, among others. Two periods were considered: P1 (time between induction and the first determination of USTTL) and P2 (time between USTTL1 and the second determination of USTTL). Results: We included 125 patients, 117 with CD. In P1, 62.4% of patients were on subcutaneous maintenance, and the median USTTL1 was 3.1 μg/mL (1.6–5.3). In 44.8% of CD patients (48/117), clinical remission was achieved, with USTTL1 significantly higher than those who did not achieve remission (3.7 μg/mL (2.3–5.4) vs 2.3 μg/mL (1.1–5.2); p = 0.04). In the 46 patients with two determinations, statistically significant differences were found between variables in P2 versus P1: clinical remission (73.9% vs 21.7%; p = 0.001); USTTL (7.2 μg/mL (4.7–11.7) vs 3.4 μg/mL (1.9–6.4); p < 0.001), HBI (4 (4–4.3) vs 8 (4–9); p < 0.001), pMayo (1 (1–3.3) vs 4.5 (3–5); p = 0.042), and corticosteroid use (26.1% vs 41.3%; p = 0.024). Receiver-Operating-Characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for clinical remission in P2, with USTTL cutoff value of 6.34 μg/mL for clinical remission and a high rate of intensified patients (98%). Conclusion: High serum levels of UST were associated with clinical remission during treatment for IBD under intensification treatment, with a cutoff point of 6.3 μg/mL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Psoriasis is a multisystem, chronic, inflammatory dermatological disease. In routine clinical practice, the management of psoriasis varies significantly. The current study aimed to develop a set of practice guidelines relevant to dermatology practice in Singapore. Method: The Psoriasis Therapeutic Guidelines Workgroup, comprising members of the Dermatological Society of Singapore with a subspecialisation in psoriasis, was convened to develop the guidelines. Clinical questions on selected topics were generated and refined by the workgroup. A literature search using PubMed was performed on their assigned topics from June 2013 to December 2023. The articles were included and graded based on the level of evidence. Results: The guidelines address topics ranging from clinical assessment to practical considerations in the management of mild, moderate and severe psoriasis, including delivery of care, referrals to specialists and adherence to treatment. The recommended therapies include phototherapy, methotrexate, acitretin, cyclosporine; apremilast; topical corticosteroids, calcipotriol, topical calcineurin inhibitors; and biologics (i.e. adalimumab, infliximab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, ustekinumab, etanercept) either in combina-tion or as monotherapy. Common therapeutic concerns relating to biologic use were addressed. Recommendations on generalised pustular psoriasis, palmoplantar pustular psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were also made. Patients on systemic therapy would receive appropriate vaccine counselling. Therapeutic implica-tions in special populations, such as pregnant/lactating women, children, the elderly, those undergoing surgery and those suffering from specific infections and cancer were addressed. Conclusion: These guidelines were developed for dermatologists, family physicians, rheumatologists and other specialists to support their selection of appropriate management options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which encompasses both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is a major health burden worldwide. There are increasing concerns surrounding the impacts of this disease due to significant rises in the prevalence rates of IBD across the world. In consideration of the complexities of managing IBD along with this marked rise in prevalence and incidence, developing new forms of treatment for this condition has become a major priority. In recent years, a potential new form of treatment for IBD has emerged in the form of biologic therapies. While there is a high level of optimism due to the development of these therapies, there is also a clear need to evaluate their effectiveness, and their overall safety profiles. For this review, we have evaluated three specific biologics used for the treatment IBD. More precisely, the focus of this review is to analyze and critically appraise the literature for vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and golimumab, and determine their roles in the management of UC and CD, respectively. After doing so, we have also briefly synthesized important new findings regarding the role of dietary and nutritional approaches. In doing so, we have aimed to contextualize the findings regarding biologics, and, in order to evaluate potential new treatment approaches for the future to augment biologic therapies, we have discussed the potential for combined approaches that incorporate the usage of both biologics and nutritional interventions for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients can be divided according to the age of disease onset and classified as late‐onset RA ≥ 60 years old or early‐onset RA < 60 years old. Current treatment guidelines do not stipulate any preference regarding the biologic that should be used first in the late‐onset group. This study aims to compare the drug survival times on first biological treatment between late and early‐onset RA patients. Methods: This is a population based cohort study using the medical records of Leumit healthcare services. We included all eligible RA patients between 2000 and 2017. RA patients were divided into late‐ and early‐onset RA groups and compared according to drug survival time on the first biological therapy. Results: The final cohort included 3814 RA patients, 2807 (73.6%) of whom had early‐onset RA. Overall, biologic disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were used more often among early‐onset compared to late‐onset patients (16.9% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.001). Among early‐onset patients, etanercept was associated with the longest drug survival time on the first biologic, and adalimumab and infliximab were associated with the longest drug survival times among late‐onset patients. No differences were observed in drug survival times between late and early‐onset patients on the first bDMARD, except for abatacept and golimumab with longer drug survival time among early‐onset patients. Conclusion: Late‐onset RA patients were treated with biologics to a lesser extent than early‐onset patients, but no differences were observed in drug survival times at the first bDMARD between the two groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess the link between the administration of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and the risk of malignancy in human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27)-positive patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) experiencing sustained inflammation. Methods: Between 2006 and 2021, 1445 HLA-B27-positive patients with AS were retrospectively evaluated. Among them, 112 patients required bDMARD therapy. The study compared conventional therapy with bDMARDs and investigated the risk factors for developing malignancies. Results: During 8253 patient-years of follow-up, 38 (2.6%) patients developed various malignancies, including lung, liver, breast, and colon cancer. The risk of malignancy was significantly higher in the bDMARD-treated group compared to PS-matched groups receiving conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The cumulative risk of malignancies increased significantly after 6 years of follow-up. All patients who developed malignancy after bDMARD therapy received tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. Requiring bDMARD therapy, requiring bDMARDs in combination with csDMARD therapy, and being diagnosed with AS after 30 years of age were independent risk factors for developing malignancy. Conclusions: HLA-B27-positive AS patients with sustained inflammation requiring biologic therapy, particularly if diagnosed after age 30, may have an increased risk of malignancy. Regular cancer screenings are advisable for these patients while undergoing biologic treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Demodex density is known to increase in various immunosuppressive conditions. The relationship between biologic therapy and Demodex density remains unknown. We aimed to investigate whether the density of Demodex mites is higher in psoriasis patients treated with biologic agents compared to treatment‐naive or topically treated patients. Methods: A cross‐sectional study was conducted, comparing psoriasis patients receiving biologic therapy (n = 34) with controls (n = 33). Demodex density was assessed using the standardized skin surface biopsy technique (SSSB). Statistical analysis was performed to compare the densities and prevalence of demodicosis between the two groups. Results: Demodex density was significantly higher in the biologic therapy group compared to the control group on the right cheek (7.29 vs. 0.12/cm2; P = 0.001), left cheek (8.15 vs. 0.24/cm2; P = 0.002), and whole face (average of all four regions: 5.50 vs. 0.80/cm2; P = 0.001). The prevalence of demodicosis was significantly higher in the biologic therapy group on the forehead (35.3% vs. 12.1%; P = 0.043), right cheek (41.2% vs. 0%; P < 0.001), and left cheek (44.1% vs. 0%; P < 0.001). The frequency of cases with demodicosis in at least one localization was higher in the biological therapy group compared to the control group (61.8% vs. 15.2%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Psoriasis patients receiving biologic therapy had a higher Demodex density and prevalence of demodicosis compared to controls. Biologics may lead to an increase in Demodex density by blocking specific cytokines, such as interleukin‐17 and tumor necrosis factor‐α, which play a role in immunity against Demodex. Further research is needed to explore the impact of different biological agents on Demodex density. Plain Language Summary: "Demodex" mites live in human hair follicles, usually without causing any harm. However, when the immune system is suppressed due to several conditions, the Demodex density (Dd) can increase. "Biological drugs" that suppress some immunity elements are used to treat psoriasis. We aimed to determine if Dd increases in 34 psoriasis patients using biological therapies compared to those who do not. Dd on the face was significantly higher in the biological treatment group compared to the controls. The blockage of certain immune system molecules by biological drugs could explain this. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prevalence and disease burden of chronic inflammatory diseases (CIDs) are predicted to rise. Patients are commonly treated with biological agents, but the individual treatment responses vary, warranting further research into optimizing treatment strategies. This study aimed to compare the clinical treatment responses in patients with CIDs initiating biologic therapy based on smoking status, a notorious risk factor in CIDs. In this multicentre cohort study including 233 patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis or psoriasis initiating biologic therapy, we compared treatment response rates after 14 to 16 weeks and secondary outcomes between smokers and non‐smokers. We evaluated the contrast between groups using logistic regression models: (i) a "crude" model, only adjusted for the CID type, and (ii) an adjusted model (including sex and age). Among the 205 patients eligible for this study, 53 (26%) were smokers. The treatment response rate among smokers (n = 23 [43%]) was lower compared to the non‐smoking CID population (n = 92 [61%]), corresponding to a "crude" OR of 0.51 (95% CI: [0.26;1.01]) while adjusting for sex and age resulted in consistent findings: 0.51 [0.26;1.02]. The contrast was apparently most prominent among the 38 RA patients, with significantly lower treatment response rates for smokers in both the "crude" and adjusted models (adjusted OR 0.13, [0.02;0.81]). Despite a significant risk of residual confounding, patients with CIDs (rheumatoid arthritis in particular) should be informed that smoking probably lowers the odds of responding sufficiently to biological therapy. Registration: Clinical.Trials.gov NCT03173144. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study sought to assess hepatitis B virus (HBV) serology and the incidence of HBV reactivation (HBVr) in rheumatology patients with resolved hepatitis B infection (HBsAg negative and HBcAb positive) who were undergoing treatment with biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). Material and Method: Data from rheumatology patients treated with b/tsDMARDs were retrospectively reviewed from the electronic records. The demographic data, the anti-rheumatic drugs used, and the hepatitis serologies (HBsAg, anti-HBc IgG, anti-HBs, and anti-HCV) of the patients were analyzed. Results: The study included a total of 316 patients, of whom 217 (68.7%) were diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis, 74 (23.4%) with rheumatoid arthritis, and 25 (7.9%) with psoriatic arthritis. Evaluation of the patients' viral serologies revealed that four (1.2%) were HBsAg positive, and 18 (5.7%) were HBsAg negative and HBcAb positive. Anti-HCV positivity was observed in one. Conclusion: The rate of resolved hepatitis B infection is relatively high in patients under rheumatologic follow-up. However, the use of biologics in these patients poses a low risk of HBVr. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. To analyze the long-term survival of subcutaneous biosimilar tumor necrosis factor inhibitors compared to the originator molecules in patients with rheumatic diseases, as well as the factors associated with drug discontinuation. Methods. Retrospective analysis of BIOBADASER, the Spanish multicenter prospective registry of patients with rheumatic disease receiving biologic and targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Patients who started etanercept (ETN) or adalimumab (ADA) from January 2016 to October 2023 were included. The survival probabilities of biosimilars and originators were compared using Kaplan-Meier estimating curves. To identify factors associated with differences in the retention rates, hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox regression models for all and specific causes (inefficacy or adverse events [AEs]) of discontinuation. Results. A total of 4162 patients received 4723 treatment courses (2991 courses of ADA and 1732 courses of ETN), of which 722 (15.29%) were with originator molecules and 4001 (84.71%) were with biosimilars. The originators were more frequently discontinued than biosimilars (53.32% vs 33.37%, respectively). The main reason for discontinuation was inefficacy (60.35% of the treatments). The risk of overall discontinuation was lower for biosimilars (adjusted HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.95). Female sex, obesity, and second or later treatment lines increased the risk of discontinuation, whereas disease duration and the use of concomitant methotrexate were associated with a greater survival. When assessing cause-specific reasons of discontinuation, excluding nonmedical switching, the results from the crude and adjusted analyses showed no significant differences in the retention rate between biosimilars and originators. Conclusion. No significant differences were found between treatments in long-term survival due to inefficacy or AEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by abdominal pain, diarrhea, rectal bleeding, and weight loss. The pathogenesis and treatment of UC remain key areas of research interest. Various factors, including genetic predisposition, immune dysregulation, and alterations in the gut microbiota, are believed to contribute to the pathogenesis of UC. Current treatments for UC include 5-aminosalicylic acids, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and biologics. However, study reported that the one-year clinical remission rate is only around 40%. It is necessary to prompt the exploration of new treatment modalities. Biologic therapies, such as anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody and JAK inhibitor, primarily consist of small molecules targeting specific pathways, effectively inducing and maintaining remission. Given the significant role of the gut microbiota, research into intestinal microecologics, such as probiotics and prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) shows promising potential in UC treatment. Additionally, medicinal herbs, such as chili pepper and turmeric, used in complementary therapy have shown promising results in UC management. This article reviews recent findings on the mechanisms of UC, including genetic susceptibility, immune cell dynamics and cytokine regulation, and gut microbiota alterations. It also discusses current applications of biologic therapy, herbal therapy, microecologics, and FMT, along with their prospects and challenges.

Abstract Factors such as obesity, alcohol consumption, and tobacco use are associated with both increased psoriasis severity and inadequate response to systemic and biologic therapies. Obesity is linked to chronic inflammation, which can contribute to psoriasis pathogenesis. Fixed-dose therapies may have reduced efficacy in patients with a higher body mass index, while weight-based dosing can increase the burden of drug-specific side effects. Alcohol and nicotine from tobacco have also been shown to stimulate keratinocyte and immune cell proliferation and production of proinflammatory cytokines. While these risk factors are prevalent among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, their influence on treatment outcomes may be overlooked when evaluating therapeutic options. Brodalumab is a fully human interleukin-17 receptor A antagonist approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. In this review, we describe the lifestyle-related risk factors associated with decreased response to treatment. We further summarize the post hoc analyses of brodalumab in participant subgroups with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and a history of prior biologic failure, obesity, and alcohol or tobacco use from two phase 3 clinical trials (AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3; ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01708603 and NCT01708629, respectively). Our review of clinical trial and real-world data suggests that brodalumab is an efficacious and safe treatment option for patients with lifestyle factors that increase the likelihood of treatment failure, allowing them to achieve skin clearance and improve quality of life.

Abstract Pityriasis Rubra Pilaris (PRP) is a rare papulosquamous inflammatory dermatosis with variable clinical presentation and poorly understood pathogenesis that often poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Data on currently available treatment options are limited, particularly when facing refractory cases. Both ustekinumab, an interleukin‐12 (IL‐12) and IL‐23 inhibitor, and guselkumab, an IL‐23p19 inhibitor, target the Th‐17 axis and are well established treatment options in moderate to severe psoriasis. However, increasing evidence, mostly derived from case reports and supported by recent understanding of the role of Th‐17 axis in PRP, also favours the use of IL‐17/IL‐23 pathway inhibitors in this disease. We present an adult female patient with long history of recalcitrant PRP refractory to multiple treatment options. Although initial improvement with ustekinumab was achieved, late disease progression ensued, leading to transition to guselkumab with remarkable clinical response.

Introduction Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and other biological agents are being increasingly approved in the last years with very different indications. Their highly heterogeneous immunosuppressive effects, mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetics require comprehensive individualized vaccination schedules.Areas covered Vaccination for immunocompromised patients. Prevention and treatment with mAbs and other biological therapies.Expert opinion Current recommendations on vaccine schedules for patients under mAbs or other biological treatments are based on expert opinions and are not individualized according to each vaccine and treatment. No studies are focusing on the high heterogeneity of these agents, which are exponentially developed and used for many different indications. Recent paradigm changes in vaccine development (boosted by the COVID-19 pandemic) and in the mAbs use for prophylactic purposes (changing ‘vaccination’ by ‘immunization’ schedules) has been witnessed in the last years. We aimed at collecting all mAbs used for treatment or prevention, approved as of 1 January 2024, by the EMA. Based on available data on mAbs and vaccines, we propose a comprehensive guide for personalizing vaccination. Recent vaccine developments and current population strategies (e.g. zoster vaccination or prophylactic nirsevimab) are discussed. This review aims to be a practical guideline for professionals working in vaccine consultations for immunosuppressed patients.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which encompasses both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), is a major health burden worldwide. There are increasing concerns surrounding the impacts of this disease due to significant rises in the prevalence rates of IBD across the world. In consideration of the complexities of managing IBD along with this marked rise in prevalence and incidence, developing new forms of treatment for this condition has become a major priority. In recent years, a potential new form of treatment for IBD has emerged in the form of biologic therapies. While there is a high level of optimism due to the development of these therapies, there is also a clear need to evaluate their effectiveness, and their overall safety profiles. For this review, we have evaluated three specific biologics used for the treatment IBD. More precisely, the focus of this review is to analyze and critically appraise the literature for vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and golimumab, and determine their roles in the management of UC and CD, respectively. After doing so, we have also briefly synthesized important new findings regarding the role of dietary and nutritional approaches. In doing so, we have aimed to contextualize the findings regarding biologics, and, in order to evaluate potential new treatment approaches for the future to augment biologic therapies, we have discussed the potential for combined approaches that incorporate the usage of both biologics and nutritional interventions for patients.

Abstract Background The treatment of erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) is challenging. Biological therapies have shown promising results in the long‐term management of this clinical variant, but most of the current available evidence is based on single case reports and short case series. Objectives To determine the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab (UST) in the treatment of EP under daily practice conditions. Methods We conducted a retrospective, observational, nationwide, multicenter cohort study of patients diagnosed with EP treated with UST under daily practice conditions with up to 3 years of follow‐up. Outcomes, such as the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) and safety, were assessed at months 1, 4, 7, 13, 19, 25, 31 and 37 during treatment. “As observed” and “intention‐to‐treat last observation carried forward (ITT‐LOCF)” analyses were performed. Results Twenty‐eight patients were enroled in the study. Baseline mean PASI was 43.1. A sharp decrease in mean PASI was observed during the first 7 months, reaching a plateau that was maintained until the end of the 37‐month follow‐up. At 7 months, 61% and 43% of the patients achieved PASI ≤ 2 and PASI 0, respectively. At 25 months, 48 (39%) (“as observed”/ITT‐LOCF) of the patients achieved complete clearance. At 31 months, PASI 75, PASI 90 and PASI 100 were achieved in 95, 80 and 45 (79%, 64% and 39%) (“as observed”/ITT‐LOCF) of the patients, respectively. Eleven patients required treatment intensification by reducing the interval between doses. Treatment minimisation was performed in four patients. During the follow‐up, nine patients (32%) received systemic combination therapy at some point. Eight patients discontinued treatment mainly due to lack of effectiveness. UST presented a good safety profile. With a follow‐up of 69.25 patient/years, only three patients exhibited serious nondrug‐related adverse events. Conclusions Ustekinumab can be a fast, effective and safe alternative for the long‐term treatment of erythrodermic psoriasis.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by recurrent painful nodules, abscesses, fistulas and scarring. The primary distinguishing factor in the complex, yet still not fully understood, pathogenesis is an inflammation occurring within the hair follicle, followed by an immune response leading to further development of the skin lesions seen in HS. The treatment of patients with HS is very difficult due to the complexity of the lesions and the frequent tendency to recurrence, which also has a negative impact on the psychological state of patients and directly translates into a reduced quality of life. This review article addresses the pathogenesis, clinical presentation of HS and, in particular, explores the new therapeutic options available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Royal Darwin Hospital (RDH) is the sole public dermatology service in the Northern Territory (NT). Prescription of biologic therapies (BT) in the NT is uniquely challenging, with remote populations carrying a high tropical disease burden. The aim of this audit is to examine the demographics and outcomes of patients on BT for dermatologic conditions. Methods: Retrospective case note review of patients receiving BT through the RDH Dermatology department between August 2021 and October 2023. Data analysed were demographics, location, dermatological diagnosis and serology status. Results: In this audit, 115 patients were included. Age range of 13–91 years, mean of 51.1 years (±14.7), 52 (45.2%) patients were female and 8 (7.8%) identified as First Nations Australian. A large geographical area was serviced, with a primary address between 1 and 1496 km from RDH. Eighteen patients (15.7%) have discontinued BT completely. There was a statistically significant relationship between cessation of BT and increased distance of primary residence from RDH (p < 0.0007). Eighteen patients (15.7%) required management of infections identified in opportunistic infection screening. These infections were strongyloidiasis, tuberculosis, melioidosis and hepatitis B. Conclusions: There is significant anxiety surrounding BT and tropical infections, including in returning travellers in southern Australian states. There has been particular interest in strongyloidiasis infection, as dupilumab acts on the Th2 immunity mechanism critical to parasitic infection response. This audit exhibits the unique experience of dermatological care in a tropical setting, demonstrating how BT can be used safely and how, when identified, these tropical infections can be successfully managed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To determine whether persistent complete B cell (BC) depletion was associated with a better clinical response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients long-term treated with rituximab (RTX). Methods We conducted a retrospective study including RA patients admitted for a new infusion between 2019 and 2021. The primary endpoint was the comparison of the mean disease activity score based on 28 joints (DAS28)-CRP at each of the four last infusion visits between patients with persistent complete BC depletion (mean CD19 counts <18/µl at each of the last four visits) or without persistent complete BC depletion (mean CD19 counts of the last four visits ≥18/µl). Secondary endpoints included DAS28, pain/fatigue visual analogue scale, CRP, gammaglobulins and the frequency of self-reported RA flares. Results Of the 126 patients in maintenance therapy with RTX [exposure period: 76 (5) months, 14 (7) infusions received], 43 (34%) had persistent complete BC depletion at each of the four last infusions. The mean DAS28-CRP calculated at each of the four last infusion visits did not significantly differ according to persistence or not of complete BC depletion. This result remained unchanged after adjusting for antibody status, number of previous therapies, number of RTX infusion and cumulative RTX dose. All secondary outcomes were also not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion Maintaining complete BC depletion does not appear to be a therapeutic target to achieve in RA patients in long-term maintenance therapy with RTX. There is a limited benefit of monitoring CD19 in RA patients long-term treated with RTX and having achieved low disease activity/remission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Adults with RA are being switched from etanercept originator to biosimilar in non-medical/cost-saving switching. This analysis aims to investigate outcomes in these patients, including (i) drug survival and (ii) disease activity at 6 months and 12 months, compared with those who remain on the originator. Methods Using BSRBR-RA, those who switched directly from etanercept originator to biosimilar were identified and matched to patients receiving the originator, based on gender, age, disease duration and originator start year. Drug survival was calculated; Cox-proportional hazard models assessed differences in drug persistence between those who switched vs remaining on originator. Change in DAS28 after 6 months and 12 months was compared between cohorts. Multiple imputation was used. Results A total of 1024 adults with RA switching from etanercept originator to biosimilar were included, with a matched cohort of patients remaining on the originator. Patients who switched onto a biosimilar product were no more likely to discontinue etanercept treatment vs those who remained on the originator; hazard ratio 1.06 (95%CI 0.89–1.26), with 65% of patients remaining on treatment at three years. Ninety-five (9%) patients switched back to the originator within the first year. After 6 months and 12 months, biosimilar patients were no more likely to have a worsening of DAS28 (>0.6 units) compared with those who remained on the originator. Conclusions This is the largest matched comparative effectiveness analysis showing patients switching from etanercept originator to biosimilar appearing to do just as well with regard to disease activity and drug persistence compared with those who remained on the originator. These data will be reassuring to clinicians and patients regarding non-medical switching. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The present investigation provides a thorough analysis of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported in the Database of the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System (FEDRA) for biologic medications primarily indicated for severe refractory asthma, including omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, and tezepelumab. Our main objective was to identify ADRs not documented in the drugs' Technical Sheets (summary of product characteristics, SmPC), potentially indicating unrecognized risks meriting pharmacovigilance attention. Methods: Data spanning from each drug's market introduction until 22 January 2024, were analyzed, sourced from direct submissions to the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System, industry communications, and literature reviews. We evaluated notifications impartially to ensure a comprehensive review of all the ADRs associated with these medications. Results: This investigation underlines the critical role of post-marketing surveillance in enhancing patient safety. It emphasizes the necessity for healthcare professionals to report ADRs comprehensively to foster a robust pharmacovigilance system. Furthermore, the study highlights gaps between the reported ADRs and the information provided in SmPCs, signaling potential areas for improvement in drug safety monitoring and regulatory oversight. Conclusions: Finally, these findings may contribute to informed decision making in clinical practice and regulatory policy, ultimately advancing patient care and safety in the management of severe uncontrolled asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic wounds pose a significant clinical challenge due to their complex pathophysiology and the burden of long-term management. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are emerging as a novel therapeutic option in managing difficult wounds, although comprehensive data on their use in wound care are lacking. This study aimed to explore existing scientific knowledge of mAbs in treating chronic wounds based on a rationale of direct inhibition of the main molecules involved in the underlying inflammatory pathophysiology. We performed a literature review excluding primary inflammatory conditions with potential ulcerative outcomes (e.g., hidradenitis suppurativa). mAbs were effective in treating wounds from 16 different etiologies. The most commonly treated conditions were pyoderma gangrenosum (treated with 12 different mAbs), lipoid necrobiosis, and cutaneous vasculitis (each treated with 3 different mAbs). Fourteen mAbs were analyzed in total. Rituximab was effective in 43.75% of cases (7/16 diseases), followed by tocilizumab (25%, 4/16 diseases), and both etanercept and adalimumab (18.75%, 3/16 conditions each). mAbs offer therapeutic potential for chronic wounds unresponsive to standard treatments. However, due to the complex molecular nature of wound healing, no single target molecule can be identified. Therefore, the use of mAbs should be considered as a translational approach for limited cases of multi-resistant conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a skin condition characterized by significant challenges and a substantial deterioration in the life quality for affected patients. The therapeutic landscape for AD has witnessed a transformative shift with the emergence of biologic therapies. Our focus centers on biologics currently undergoing phase III and IV clinical trials, deeming them to hold the highest potential for significant clinical relevance. To identify biologic drugs under development in phase III and IV clinical trials, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov. Additional relevant trials were identified through JapicCTI/ Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) with a citation search. A search in MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed. There have been 76 clinical trials identified concerning biologic drugs: dupilumab (34 trials), lebrikizumab (14 trials), tralokinumab (10 trials), rocatinlimab (7 trials), amlitelimab (2 trials), nemolizumab (6 trials), MG-K10 (1 trial), CM310 (1 trial), 611 (1 trial). A search in MEDLINE revealed 132 articles concerning phase III and IV clinical trials for AD treatment. A total of 39 articles concerned biologic drugs covering 23 clinical trials. A search in EMBASE revealed 268 relevant articles, allowing us to identify results of an additional six clinical trials. The safety and efficacy of these biologics are comprehensively addressed in this review. This comprehensive review aims to explore the current landscape of biologic therapies for AD, delving into the latest research findings, clinical trial outcomes, and the diverse mechanisms of action employed by these novel interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic, recurrent inflammatory diseases with partly understood etiology and pathogenesis. The course of IBD, both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, is characterized by periods of relapse and remission with the possible occurrence of extraintestinal manifestations. Summary: During the last decades, therapeutic goals in IBD evolved toward endoscopic remission and mucosal healing creating the need for early administration of disease-modifying agents (DMAs). DMAs include conventional immunosuppressants (thiopurines, methotrexate), biologic drugs (anti-TNF, anti-integrin, and anti-IL-12/23 monoclonal antibodies), and small molecules (JAK inhibitors, S1P receptor modulators). Patients with aggressive course of disease and risk factors for poor prognosis should be treated with biologic therapy early, while conventional immunomodulators should be used in those with milder course of disease in the absence of risk factors. Key Messages: Challenges in the treatment of IBD patients include the choice of effective yet safe drug and prevention or overcoming loss of response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this original research, we present the results in terms of effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab for hidradenitis suppurativa in real clinical practice. Results indicated significant improvement in all activity scores and patient‐reported outcomes at week 16, including a notable decrease in mean IHS4 from 27.1 to 15.6 (p < 0.001), HS‐PGA from 5.1 to 3.2 (p < 0.001), VAS pain from 8.3 to 4.7 (p < 0.001) and DLQI from 21.6 to 12.6 (p < 0.001). Bimekizumab, administered every 2 or 4 weeks, was well‐tolerated with no discontinuations and no new safety concerns identified. These findings corroborate the drug's effectiveness and favourable safety profile observed in phase 3 clinical trials, supporting its use in real‐world clinical practice for treating HS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The incidence of paediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to increase in both adults and children across the globe, with more than one third of the patients not responding to anti‐tumour necrosis factor biologics and immune modulators. This narrative review provides an overview of novel pharmacological developments in the management of paediatric IBD, including new biological therapies. Methods: A PubMed Medline search was performed to include randomised controlled trials, retrospective and prospective observational studies, and relevant case reports of children with IBD published between 2018 and January 2023. Guidelines and protocols from relevant paediatric and adult gastroenterology societies, such as the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition and the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation, were also included. Non‐pharmacological treatments including therapeutic diets and faecal microbiota transplantation were outside the scope of this work. Results: Early real‐world evidence suggests that newer biologics and small molecules, such as anti‐integrins, interleukin‐12 and/or interleukin‐23 inhibitors, Janus kinase and signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins inhibitors, are safe and effective in adult patients with IBD, with promising growing evidence for paediatric IBD. Conclusion: While many developments have been achieved with novel pharmacological treatments to manage IBD, ongoing research is required to confirm their effectiveness and safety in the paediatric age. Extending the licence of novel treatments to children will be crucial to tackle the increasing loss of response to conventional treatments. International guidelines will require timely updating to incorporate novel treatments within the existing protocols. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biologic drugs have been shown to reduce asthma exacerbations, improve lung function and quality of life, reduce oral corticosteroid use in appropriately selected patients. Mepolizumab has been demonstrated to have a safety profile that is similar to placebo, however, when present side effects may lead to treatment discontinuation. Among these, headache is one of the most common. We hereby describe the case of a never-smoking male patient with an eosinophilic corticosteroid-dependent severe asthma. He displayed well controlled comorbidities and good adherence to the inhaled therapy. Mepolizumab was started in 2017 with an initial remarkable clinical improvement. After three doses of biologic therapy, he reported a severe orthostatic headache associated with vomiting, unresponsive to analgesic drugs, that required hospitalization. No other cause than treatment with Mepolizumab was found to be plausibly associated with this new-onset headache. The therapeutic regimen was modified by administering Mepolizumab for two consecutive months alternated with a one-month break. The patient did not experience any further episodes of headache, while maintaining a good and stable control of his asthma. We were able to taper oral corticosteroids, and no flares-ups occurred in the following 5 years. Our experience indicates that a tailored strategy for managing severe asthmatic patients, who have experienced side effects from biologic drugs, can be effective in maintaining drug efficacy while minimizing side effects. Further studies on a larger number of patients are required to demonstrate whether the positive outcomes here described are replicable on a larger scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives In an era of increasing paediatric obesity and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), this study evaluates the disease phenotype and clinical course of Crohn's disease (CD) in paediatric patients who are obese or overweight. Methods This is a retrospective, single-center, descriptive observational study from January 2010 to May 2020. Participants were included if they were: aged 2 to 18 years at the time of diagnosis, had a confirmed diagnosis of CD, and met WHO criteria for overweight or obesity at the time of diagnosis or within one year before diagnosis. Results A total of 345 patient charts with CD were screened during the study period, with 16 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Median age of patients was 15.5 years (IQR = 13.6, 16.1). Of the 15 patients over 10 years of age, median anthropometrics at diagnosis included body mass index (BMI) of 27.2 (IQR = 24.9, 29.4) and BMI for age z-score of 1.82 (IQR = 1.58, 2.19). Presenting symptoms included abdominal pain (80.0%), diarrhea (66.7%), hematochezia (66.7%), and weight loss (26.7%). Five patients (33.3%) had obesity-related complications. Median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 146 days (IQR = 31, 367), and median time from diagnosis to remission was 229 days (IQR = 101.8, 496.3). Conclusions Patients with elevated BMI and CD present with typical symptoms of IBD, although weight loss was a less common presenting symptom. Time to disease remission is delayed, and obesity-related complications are common. Primary care providers must have a high degree of clinical suspicion in patients to prevent delays to gastroenterology referral and to improve time to disease remission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims This study compares the effectiveness of different biologic therapies and sequences in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] using real-world data from a large cohort with long exposure. Methods Demographic, disease, treatment, and outcome data were retrieved for patients in the UK IBD BioResource. Effectiveness of treatment was based on persistence free of discontinuation or failure, analysed by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for differences between groups. Results In total, 13 222 evaluable patients received at least one biologic. In ulcerative colitis [UC] first-line vedolizumab [VDZ] demonstrated superior effectiveness over 5 years compared to anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] agents [ p  = 0.006]. VDZ was superior to both infliximab [IFX] and adalimumab [ADA] after ADA and IFX failure respectively [ p  < 0.001 and p  < 0.001]. Anti-TNF therapy showed similar effectiveness when used as first-line treatment, or after failure of VDZ. In Crohn's disease [CD] we found significant differences between first-line treatments over 10 years [ p  = 0.045], with superior effectiveness of IFX compared to ADA in perianal CD. Non-anti-TNF biologics were superior to a second anti-TNF after first-line anti-TNF failure in CD [ p  = 0.035]. Patients with UC or CD experiencing TNF failure due to delayed loss of response or intolerance had superior outcomes when switching to a non-anti-TNF biologic, rather than a second anti-TNF. Conclusions We provide real-world evidence to guide biologic selection and sequencing in a range of common scenarios. Our findings challenge current guidelines regarding drug selection after loss of response to first anti-TNF treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Obesity and dyslipidemia are frequently observed in patients with psoriasis. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of biological therapy on body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), appetite, and blood lipid profiles in patients with psoriasis. A total of 83 patients receiving biologic therapy (n=44) [anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) (n=5), interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitor (n=13), IL-17 inhibitor (n=20), and IL-23 inhibitor (n=6)] and conventional therapy (n=39) [methotrexate (MTX) (n=25) and acitretin (n=14)] were included in the study. The patient’s baseline and current BW, BMI, waist circumference, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), plasma triglyceride values, and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) were retrospectively screened. Appetite was assessed with the Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ). The mean BW percent change values were found to increase by 2.40±2.30 kg, 2.38±4.13 kg, and 0.40±3.47 kg in patients taking anti-TNFα, IL-12/23 inhibitor, and IL-17 inhibitor agents, respectively, decrease by -0.60±0.89 kg in those receiving an IL-23 inhibitor; increase by 0.52±3.40 kg and 1.38±2.79 kg in those receiving MTX and acitretin, respectively. The triglyceride percent change rates increased with MTX (27.46±52.87 mg/dl) (p=0.029). Anti-TNFα and ixekizumab increased HDL percent change rates (21.44±20.99 mg/dl and 24.4±35.40 mg/dl, respectively) (p=0.044 and p=0.005). Although the SNAQ scores were similar in patients using conventional and biological drugs, a negative correlation was observed between the SNAQ scores and the PASI change (p=0.049, r=-0.221). In addition, an increase in BMI had a negative correlation with the PASI change (p=0.01, r=-0.282). Anti-TNFα and IL-12-23 inhibitors increased BW. While MTX increased triglyceride levels, anti-TNFα and ixekizumab increased HDL levels. In the treatment of psoriasis, the presence of obesity and blood lipid profiles should be considered in the selection of the appropriate treatment for each patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report the case of a 55-year-old female with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp. Rhinosinusitis recurred 6 months after full-house endoscopic sinus surgery. Although conventional treatment with azathioprine and mepolizumab with steroids was given, it was difficult to simultaneously control both rhinosinusitis and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Clinical examinations showed polyps in the olfactory cleft, and the patient's anosmia gradually became persistent. Even after administering mepolizumab for a certain period of time, symptoms did not improve, but when the biologic agent was switched to dupilumab, an improvement in recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp was observed. While dupilumab was administered intermittently for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp, the rhinosinusitis improved and symptoms such as worsening of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis paresthesia were observed. Both symptoms gradually subsided 19 months after starting intermittent administration, leading to the discontinuation of dupilumab administration. Rhinosinusitis in the setting of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis may be refractory in some cases, and this case provides findings demonstrating the strong effect of dupilumab on eosinophilic inflammation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background While biologic therapy, typically with infliximab or Roferon, was used for Behçet syndrome after first-line immunosuppressants, no high-quality randomised trials or predictive biomarkers were available. Objective To undertake a randomised controlled clinical trial of infliximab versus Roferon in Behçet syndrome and identify potential biomarkers for response. Design Pragmatic, standard of care, single-masked, randomised, two-arm, parallel head-to-head trial, with exploratory study on potential role of interferon lambda 3 and interferon lambda 4 single nucleotide polymorphisms and urinary metabolomics biomarkers. Setting Three national UK Behçet syndrome centres and allied clinics. Participants Patients with active Behçet syndrome, fulfilling International Study Group 1990 criteria, with inadequate response to or intolerance of first-line treatment. Intervention Randomisation to infliximab (5 mg/kg intravenous infusion) or Roferon (subcutaneous injection), utilising the UK Behçet syndrome drug pathway protocol. Outcomes Primary outcome: modified Behçet’s disease activity index at 12 weeks of therapy. Secondary outcomes: (1) modified Behçet’s disease activity index score at 24 weeks and (2) significant improvement at 12 and 24 weeks from baseline in vitreous haze and best corrected visual acuity change, oral ulcer severity score, number of genital ulcers, arthritis pain, adverse events, reduction in dose of glucocorticoid, quality-of-life scores and Physician’s Global Assessment of disease activity. Sample size Utilising a Bayesian analysis of covariance model (80% credible interval), initial sample size was 45/arm (Bayesian power 90%). With an anticipated 10% dropout rate, 100 patients were to be recruited. Following recommendations to reduce the overall length of the trial, this was revised down to 80 patients (36 in each arm, allowing for 10% dropout): 80% equi-tailed credibility interval, Bayesian power 88%. In total, 79 patients were eventually recruited for the study. Methods Patients with refractory active Behçet syndrome underwent stratified block randomisation, based on randomly permuted blocks with random block sizes of two and four, allocating treatment to either infliximab or Roferon. Follow up with symptom-directed examination at weeks 12 and 24 according to standard of care. Analysis of the primary end point was undertaken using a Bayesian analysis of covariance approach. Informative priors for the anticipated treatment effect were derived from a cohort of six international experts prior to the start of the study. Results In this first prospective head-to-head randomised controlled clinical trial of two biologic drugs in Behçet syndrome, both infliximab and Roferon were equally effective [mean difference (80% credibility interval) = 0.13 (–0.19 to 0.46)], with a trend for minor benefit in favour of infliximab in terms of tolerability and treatment persistence. Genetic data suggested a potential association between patient outcome and carriage of either rs4803221 or rs7248668 variants in the interferon lambda 3 (interleukin 28B) gene locus in the Roferon-treated arm. However, with the relatively small sample size, statistical significance of the association was lost when correcting for multiple tests. Metabolomic analysis identified potential markers of a metabolic response to treatment with infliximab. Limitations Single-masked design. Slow recruitment with fewer patients recruited in total, limiting the strength of analysis for secondary outcomes and mechanistic studies. Conclusion We report clinical efficacy in both infliximab and Roferon in refractory active Behçet syndrome, together with the potential for a novel metabolomic biomarker identifying response to infliximab. Future work Further work will characterise the appropriate metabolite(s) from existing samples to inform future prospective trials to study this in more detail clinically. The efficacy of Roferon in Behçet syndrome may support future manufacture of this drug. Trial registration This trial is registered as EudraCT Number: 2014-005390-36; ISRCTN49793874. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) programme (NIHR award ref: 12/205/46) and is published in full in Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation; Vol. 11, No. 17. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information. Plain language summary Behçet syndrome, a very rare disease in the UK, causes major illness. Yet without high-quality, randomised, controlled trials, choosing treatment is somewhat hit and miss. We set up a randomised controlled clinical trial to study the two most widely used biologic drugs in Behçet syndrome, infliximab and Roferon, head-to-head and searched for potential blood and urinary markers for response. Patients with active Behçet syndrome, in the United Kingdom national Behçet syndrome centres and allied clinics, who had not responded to or could not tolerate first-line treatment were randomised to either infliximab infusions or Roferon injections. The primary outcome was modified Behçet’s disease activity index at 12 weeks of therapy. Secondary outcomes included modified Behçet’s disease activity index at 24 weeks and significant improvements in individual organs, quality of life and Physician’s Global Assessments of activity at 12 and 24 weeks. Initial assessment suggested 100 patients were required for a statistically meaningful outcome but was revised down to 80 following recommendations to shorten the trial. In this first prospective head-to-head randomised controlled clinical trial of two biologics in Behçet syndrome, both drugs worked equally well. There was a non-significant trend for minor benefits of infliximab in terms of tolerability and treatment persistence. Genetic data suggested a potential association between patient outcome and carriage of either rs4803221 or rs7248668 variants in the interferon lambda 3 (interleukin 28B) gene locus in the Roferon arm, but statistical significance was lost with the relatively small sample size. Metabolomics analysis identified potential markers of a metabolic response to infliximab. The limitations of the study included the single-masked design: patients (but not clinicians) were aware of their treatment, and fewer patients were studied than planned. This limited the strength of analysis for secondary outcomes and mechanistic studies. We now plan to characterise the metabolite(s) from existing samples to design future trials to study if there can be effective targeting of treatment in Behçet syndrome. Scientific summary Background Behçet syndrome (BS), a multisystem inflammatory vasculitis, is infrequent in the UK, but it has the potential to cause significant morbidity and mortality. The evidence base supporting biologic treatment, which is used for active disease after failure of standard immunosuppression or when prognosis is poor, is largely based on uncontrolled studies. At the time of the trial, the UK National guideline for therapy of Behçet’s indicated that either the tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor infliximab or the interferon alpha drug Roferon could be employed as treatment for patients following failure of first-line treatment with standard immunomodulators. The Bio Behçet’s trial was conceived to exploit the opportunity of the three UK National Centres of Excellence for Behçet’s and associated satellite centres to undertake the first randomised clinical trial to compare infliximab and Roferon as treatment for BS, together with an exploratory analysis of potential genomic and metabolomic biomarkers of therapeutic response. Methods The Bio Behçet’s trial is a pragmatic, standard of care, single-masked, randomised, two-arm, parallel trial comparing the efficacies of infliximab and Roferon employed after failure of first-line therapy in BS. Patients with BS, diagnosed according to the International Study Group 1990 criteria, with active disease who had failed to respond to, or were intolerant of, first-line treatment of BS with topical steroids or small-molecule immunosuppressants were randomised to treatment with either infliximab (Remicade) 5 mg/kg intravenous infusions or Roferon subcutaneous injection (in variable dose), utilising the treatment protocol for each of these drugs in normal clinical care as detailed in the BS drugs pathway for England. The trial utilised a Bayesian design utilising priors informed by a small survey of international experts in BS. Utilising a Bayesian analysis of covariance model, with an 80% credible interval, a sample size of 45 patients per arm was deemed appropriate and gave a Bayesian power of 90%. Allowing for an anticipated 10% dropout rate, 100 patients were planned to be recruited but reduced to 80 following recommendations to reduce the overall length of the trial. Allowing for a 10% dropout rate, estimates of study power based on 72 evaluable patients (36 on each arm) and an 80% credible interval a Bayesian power of 88% was obtained. Between June 2016 and February 2020, 161 patients were screened, and 79 patients were randomised. The intention-to-treat analysis was restricted to 37 subjects allocated to infliximab and 37 to Roferon. Based on previous work with hepatitis C infection and response to interferon therapy and given the role of the innate immune system in the pathogenesis of BS, we examined interferon lambda 3 (IFNL3) and interferon lambda 4 (IFNL4) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as biomarkers of response to treatment with alpha interferon and/or infliximab in BS. We also examined the potential for urine metabolomics to act as biomarkers for drug response. The primary outcome was a modified version of the Behçet’s disease activity index (mBDAI) after 3 months of therapy. Secondary outcomes comprised mBDAI score after 6 months of therapy and significant improvement in organ systems after 3 and 6 months (week 12 and week 24 visits) assessed by: reduction in vitreous haze using the SUN consensus group grading scale and best corrected visual acuity change [using the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR) chart at 4 m] from baseline; change in oral ulcer severity score; change in number of genital ulcers; arthritis pain (10 cm Likert scale); adverse events (AEs) in each group; reduction in dose of prednisolone (or equivalent glucocorticoid) at 3 months (week 12 visit); reduction in dose of prednisolone (or equivalent glucocorticoid) at 6 months (week 24 visit); quality-of-life (QoL) scores at 3 and 6 months (week 12 and week 24 visits) and Physician’s Global Assessment of disease activity at 3 and 6 months (week 12 and week 24 visits). Results Baseline characteristics of the two treatment arms did not differ significantly by sex, ethnic profile, baseline disease characteristics and steroid use. For the primary outcome measure, change in mBDAI between baseline and 3 months (and as a secondary outcome between baseline and 6 months) did not differ significantly between the two treatments [mean difference (80% CrI) = 0.13 (–0.19 to 0.46)]. A significantly higher proportion of patients randomised to Roferon swapped away from their randomised treatment compared to those randomised to infliximab treatment (Roferon 11 of 37, infliximab 3 of 37; p = 0.0104). The clinician’s overall perception of disease activity indicated a reduction in disease activity for most patients between baseline and 3 months and between baseline and 6 months, with a median reduction of −2.0 (infliximab) and −1.0 (Roferon) at 3 months and −3.0 (infliximab) and −2.0 (alpha interferon) at 6 months. There was a small but significant difference in favour of infliximab compared to Roferon at both 3 and 6 months (p

Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (IMIDs) are known to have an elevated risk of developing cancer, but the exact causative factors remain subject to ongoing debate. This narrative review aims to present the available evidence concerning the intricate relationship between these two conditions. Environmental influences and genetic predisposition lead to a dysregulated immune response resulting in chronic inflammation, which is crucial in the pathogenesis of IMIDs and oncogenic processes. Mechanisms such as the inflammatory microenvironment, aberrant intercellular communication due to abnormal cytokine levels, excessive reparative responses, and pathological angiogenesis are involved. The chronic immunosuppression resulting from IMIDs treatments further adds to the complexity of the pathogenic scenario. In conclusion, this review highlights critical gaps in the current literature, suggesting potential avenues for future research. The intricate interplay between IMIDs and cancer necessitates more investigation to deepen our understanding and improve patient management.

Mild psoriasis may be burdensome; if symptoms are inadequately controlled, switching therapy may be warranted. In the Phase 3 NAVIGATE trial, patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis received ustekinumab for 16 weeks. Patients with inadequate response (Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA] ≥ 2) were randomized to switch to guselkumab or continue ustekinumab. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the patient subgroup with residual mild psoriasis (IGA = 2) after initial ustekinumab therapy. Outcomes assessed included the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD). Initially, 871 patients received ustekinumab. At Week 16, 161 randomized patients had residual mild psoriasis (IGA = 2). Among guselkumab- vs ustekinumab-treated patients at Week 28, 59.0% vs 27.7% achieved PASI 90, and 50.0% vs 21.0% achieved DLQI 0/1. Mean changes from baseline in PSSD score were –44 vs –28 and –50 vs –32, respectively, with thresholds of –40 considered clinically meaningful. Mean changes in PSSD itch score were –4.6 vs –2.9, with reductions ≥ 4.0 considered clinically meaningful. Treatment differences were maintained/increased through Week 52. Among patients with residual mild psoriasis after 16 weeks of ustekinumab, those switching to guselkumab had greater improvements in skin clearance, health-related quality of life, and patient-reported symptoms and signs than those continuing ustekinumab.