Search

Several studies have indicated metabolic function disruption effects of bisphenol analogues through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and gamma pathways. In the present study, we found for the first time that PPARβ/δ might be a novel cellular target of bisphenol analogues. By using the fluorescence competitive binding assay, we found seven bisphenol analogues could bind to PPARβ/δ directly, among which tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA, 18.38-fold) and tetrachlorobisphenol A (TCBPA, 12.06-fold) exhibited stronger binding affinity than bisphenol A (BPA). In PPARβ/δ-mediated luciferase reporter gene assay, the seven bisphenol analogues showed transcriptional activity toward PPARβ/δ. Bisphenol AF (BPAF), bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol B (BPB) even showed higher transcriptional activity than BPA, while TBBPA and TCBPA showed comparable activity with BPA. Moreover, in human liver HL-7702 cells, the bisphenol analogues promoted the expression of two PPARβ/δ target genes PDK4 and ANGPTL4. Molecular docking simulation indicated the binding potency of bisphenol analogues to PPARβ/δ might depend on halogenation and hydrophobicity and the transcriptional activity might depend on their binding affinity and hydrogen bond interactions. Overall, the PPARβ/δ pathway may provide a new mechanism for the metabolic function disruption of bisphenol analogues, and TBBPA and TCBPA might exert higher metabolic disruption effects than BPA via PPARβ/δ pathway.

Twenty eight new aryloxybenzene analogues were synthesized and their in vitro binding potencies toward S1PR2 were determined using a [32P]S1P competitive binding assay. Out of these new analogues, three compounds, 28c (IC 50 = 29.9 ± 3.9 nM), 28e (IC 50 = 14.6 ± 1.5 nM), and 28g (IC 50 = 38.5 ± 6.3 nM) exhibited high binding potency toward S1PR2 and high selectivity over the other four receptor subtypes (S1PR1, 3, 4, and 5; IC 50 > 1000 nM). Each of the three potent compounds 28c , 28e , and 28g contains a fluorine atom that will allow to develop F-18 labeled PET radiotracers for imaging S1PR2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

fast and convenient spectroscopic methodology to determine the water uptake capacity of amphiphile assemblies studied in multilayer films is presented. This method was developed to provide a reliable but relatively simple tool for estimating the binding potency of such complex systems. The water-binding potency represents a general propensity of higher-order systems to bind or embed relevant ligands, such as various non-lipid effectors in the case of artificial lipid membranes. In this sense, the binding potency might contribute to a specific functional role of certain lipids. The essence of the new method is that the calibration of data measured by infrared (IR) spectroscopy against those directly obtained by Karl–Fischer titration (KFT) enables one to replace the expensive chemical–analytical technique by a more comfortable and efficient IR-spectroscopic protocol. This approach combines the easy handling, versatility, and availability of IR spectroscopy with the high accuracy of KFT. The usefulness of the procedure is demonstrated on an example set of six amphiphiles with a common chain length of 18 carbon atoms. Despite this similarity, the binding potency data differ tremendously in a way which can be correlated with the systematic variations introduced into the amphiphile structure. Going further beyond the methodical aspect, the scientific relevance of the data is comprehensively discussed especially in terms of the structural factors that govern the binding potency of amphiphiles. That is favored mainly by fluidity and disfavored mainly by inter-amphiphile binding networks. For phosphatidylcholine, our data are strongly in favor of a particular hydration model that involves primary water binding to phosphate as well as the formation of water semi-clathrates hosting the trimethylammonium moiety. Interestingly, stearylamine and diolein assemblies did not take up any water at all. This unexpected hydrophobicity is due to the unusual structures formed in these latter cases: rigid ammonium amide with a strong hydrogen-bonding/salt bridge network in stearylamine, and patches of inverted micelles in diolein, as revealed by molecular dynamics simulations. [Figure not available: see fulltext.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several studies have indicated metabolic function disruption effects of bisphenol analogues through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and gamma pathways. In the present study, we found for the first time that PPARβ/δ might be a novel cellular target of bisphenol analogues. By using the fluorescence competitive binding assay, we found seven bisphenol analogues could bind to PPARβ/δ directly, among which tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA, 18.38-fold) and tetrachlorobisphenol A (TCBPA, 12.06-fold) exhibited stronger binding affinity than bisphenol A (BPA). In PPARβ/δ-mediated luciferase reporter gene assay, the seven bisphenol analogues showed transcriptional activity toward PPARβ/δ. Bisphenol AF (BPAF), bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol B (BPB) even showed higher transcriptional activity than BPA, while TBBPA and TCBPA showed comparable activity with BPA. Moreover, in human liver HL-7702 cells, the bisphenol analogues promoted the expression of two PPARβ/δ target genes PDK4 and ANGPTL4. Molecular docking simulation indicated the binding potency of bisphenol analogues to PPARβ/δ might depend on halogenation and hydrophobicity and the transcriptional activity might depend on their binding affinity and hydrogen bond interactions. Overall, the PPARβ/δ pathway may provide a new mechanism for the metabolic function disruption of bisphenol analogues, and TBBPA and TCBPA might exert higher metabolic disruption effects than BPA via PPARβ/δ pathway. [Display omitted] • Bisphenol analogues directly bind to and activate PPARβ/δ receptor. • TBBPA and TCBPA exhibit stronger binding affinity with PPARβ/δ than BPA. • TBBPA and TCBPA exert higher PPARβ/δ disruption activity than BPA in HL-7702 cells. • Halogenation, hydrophobicity and hydrogen bond interactions play essential roles in binding and activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]