Search

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the aortic dissection detection risk score (ADD-RS) used alone or in combination with D-dimer for detecting acute aortic syndrome (AAS) in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of AAS. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2024. Additionally, the reference lists of included studies and other systematic reviews were thoroughly searched. All diagnostic accuracy studies that assessed the use of ADD-RS alone or with D-Dimer for diagnosing AAS compared with a reference standard test (e.g. computer tomographic angiography (CTA), ECG-gated CTA, echocardiography, magnetic resonance angiography, operation, or autopsy) were included. Two reviewers independently selected and extracted data. Risk of bias was appraised using QUADAS-2 tool. Data were synthesised using hierarchical meta-analysis models. Results: We selected 13 studies from the 2017 citations identified, including six studies evaluating combinations of ADD-RS alongside D-dimer>500ng/L. Summary sensitivities and specificities (95% credible interval) were: ADD-RS>0 94.6% (90%, 97.5%) and 34.7% (20.7%, 51.2%), ADD-RS>1 43.4% (31.2%, 57.1%) and 89.3% (80.4%, 94.8%); ADD RS>0 or D-Dimer>500ng/L 99.8% (98.7%, 100%) and 21.8% (12.1%, 32.6%); ADD RS>1 or D-Dimer>500ng/L 98.3% (94.9%, 99.5%) and 51.4% (38.7%, 64.1%); ADD RS>1 or ADD RS = 1 with D-dimer>500ng/L 93.1% (87.1%, 96.3%) and 67.1% (54.4%, 77.7%). Conclusions: Combinations of ADD-RS and D-dimer can be used to select patients with suspected AAS for imaging with a range of trade-offs between sensitivity (93.1% to 99.8%) and specificity (21.8% to 67.1%). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Point-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays may further accelerate the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). This study sought to assess the clinical and analytical performance of the novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI)-SPINCHIP POC test. Adult patients presenting with acute chest discomfort to the emergency department were enrolled in an international, diagnostic, multicenter study. The final diagnosis was centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using all clinical information. We compared the discriminatory performance of hs-cTnI-SPINCHIP with current established central laboratory assays and derived an assay-specific hs-cTnI-SPINCHIP 0/1-hour algorithm. Secondary analyses included sample type comparisons (whole blood, fresh/frozen plasma, and capillary finger prick) and precision analysis. MI was the adjudicated final diagnosis in 214 (19%) of 1,102 patients. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.95) for hs-cTnI-SPINCHIP vs 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.95) for hs-cTnI-Architect (P = 0.907) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95) for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T Elecsys (P = 0.305). A cutoff <7 ng/L at presentation (if chest pain onset was >3 hours) or <7 ng/L together with a 0/1-hour delta of <4 ng/L ruled out 51% with a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 97.7%-100%) and 100% (95% CI: 99.0%-100%), respectively. A hs-cTnI-SPINCHIP concentration ≥36 ng/L or a 0/1-hour delta ≥11 ng/L ruled in 27% with a specificity and positive predictive value of 90.9% (95% CI: 88.3%-92.9%) and 72.9% (95% CI: 66.4%-78.6%), respectively. Bootstrap internal validation confirmed excellent diagnostic performance. High agreement was observed between different sample types. The SPINCHIP hs-cTnI POC test has very high diagnostic accuracy. Its assay-specific 0/1-hour algorithm achieved very high sensitivity/negative predictive value and specificity/positive predictive value for rule-out/in MI. (Advantageous Predictors of Acute Coronary Syndromes Evaluation [APACE] Study [APACE]; NCT00470587) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Importance: The diagnostic accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) performed in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain is currently unknown., Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of regional wall motion abnormalities detected with FoCUS for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) diagnosis., Design: A Single-center prospective observational study conducted in 2022 in the ED of the University Hospital Careggi, Italy., Setting and Participants: Adult patients presenting to the ED with acute nontraumatic chest pain were enrolled, irrespective of the presence of previous regional wall motion abnormalities. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions and patients with hemodynamic instability were excluded. FoCUS was performed at presentation by a trained ED physician., Outcome Measures and Analysis: The final diagnosis of NSTE-ACS vs. alternative diagnosis was adjudicated by an ED physician blinded to FoCUS results after a 30-day follow-up. To assess if regional wall motion abnormalities were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS, a multivariable logistic regression model was built. Diagnostic performance measures were calculated. A sensitivity analysis considering only type-1 NSTEMIs (i.e. plaque rupture/thrombosis) was conducted., Main Results: Among 686 patients, NSTE-ACS was adjudicated in 106 (15.5%) patients, 67 of which were NSTEMIs. A total of 87 (12.7%) patients had regional wall motion abnormalities detected by FoCUS, which were an independent predictor of NSTE-ACS in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Regional wall motion abnormalities had a sensitivity of 42.5% (33.0-51.9), a specificity of 92.8% (90.6-94.9), a negative predictive value of 89.8% (87.4-92.2), and a positive predictive value of 51.7% (41.2-62.2), for NSTE-ACS. Results were consistent in the sensitivity analysis., Conclusions: In ED patients with chest pain and no ST elevation, the detection of regional wall motion abnormalities was a predictor of NSTE-ACS. Despite a high specificity, which indicated a possible role of FoCUS in the rule-in of NSTE-ACS, sensitivity was too low to allow a safe rule-out using FoCUS results alone., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)