Search

This article provides an overview of the role of imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of biliary tract cancer (BTC), which includes cancers of the biliary tree and gallbladder. The incidence of BTC varies by region. Imaging techniques such as ultrasound, CT, and MRI are commonly used for detection and staging of BTC. The article also mentions emerging approaches like radiomics and artificial intelligence that can provide valuable information for diagnosis and prognosis. The document is a list of references related to hepatic and biliary regeneration, cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancer. [Extracted from the article]

Objective·To comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to biliary tract cancer (BTC), and provide a basis for better clinical application.Methods·Clinical studies on the diagnostic value of cfDNA to BTC were collected by searching eight databases from inception to April 2023. The studies were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then data was extracted. The threshold effects were assessed with Spearman′s rank correlation analysis, and heterogeneity among the included studies was analyzed by using Cochran′s Q test and I2 test. A bivariate mixed-effects model was fitted, and statistics such as overall sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to determine the diagnostic performance. The subgroup analyses were carried out based on the study type, sample size, detection method, sample source, and diagnostic reference standard.Results·A total of 28 diagnosis tests were included, all of which were evaluated as medium-high quality by using Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Tool Version 2 (QUADAS-2). The presence of threshold effects was found by using the Spearman rank correlation analysis. The pooled sensitivity was 0.80 (95%CI 0.67‒0.88), and specificity was 0.96 (95%CI 0.92‒0.98), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 22.7 (95%CI 9.4‒55.2), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.21 (95%CI 0.12‒0.36), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 108 (95%CI 31‒374), respectively. The AUC of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.96 (95%CI 0.94‒0.98), demonstrating the high accuracy of cfDNA in the diagnosis of BTC. The results of subgroup analyses suggested that the accuracy and sensitivity of choosing different testing methods and sample sources varied.Conclusion·The detection of cfDNA has high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing BTC, and is suitable for the patients suspected to be malignant after screening with imaging tests and conventional tumor markers. However, the standardization and uniformity of detection methods and sample sources still need to be further standardized by conducting clinical studies on a wider population.

Introduction: Systemic inflammatory markers have been validated as prognostic factors for patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC). The aim of this study was to evaluate specific immunologic prognostic markers and immune responses by analyzing preoperative plasma samples from a large prospectively collected biobank. Methods: Expression of 92 proteins representing adaptive and innate immune responses was investigated in plasma from 102 patients undergoing resection for BTC 2009-2017 (perihilar cholangiocarcinoma n=46, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma n=27, gallbladder cancer n=29), by means of a highthroughput multiplexed immunoassay. Association with overall survival was analyzed by Cox regression, with internal validation and calibration. Tumor tissue bulk and single-cell gene expression of identified markers and receptors/ligands was analyzed in external cohorts. Results: Three preoperative plasma markers were independently associated with survival: TRAIL, TIE2 and CSF1, with hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) 0.30 (0.16-0.56), 2.78 (1.20-6.48) and 4.02 (1.40-11.59) respectively. The discrimination of a preoperative prognostic model with the three plasma markers was assessed with concordance-index 0.70, while the concordanceindex of a postoperative model with histopathological staging was 0.66. Accounting for subgroup differences, prognostic factors were assessed for each type of BTC. TRAIL and CSF1 were prognostic factors in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. In independent cohorts, TRAIL-receptor expression was higher in tumor tissue and seen in malignant cells, with TRAIL and CSF1 expressed by intra- and peritumoral immune cells. Intratumoral TRAIL-activity was decreased compared to peritumoral immune cells, while CSF1-activity was increased. The highest CSF1 activity was seen in intratumoral macrophages, while the highest TRAIL-activity was seen in peritumoral T-cells. Discussion: In conclusion, three preoperative immunological plasma markers were prognostic for survival after surgery for BTC, providing good discrimination, even compared to postoperative pathology. TRAIL and CSF1, prognostic factors in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, showed marked differences in expression and activity between intra- and peritumoral immune cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive carcinoma with a dismal prognosis. For the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, cisplatin/gemcitabine has been the standard of care for more than 10 years. Its combination with the immune checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab resulted in an efficiency improvement in the phase III setting. Regarding the use of chemotherapy in the second line, positive phase III data could only be generated for FOLFOX. The evidence base for nanoliposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) is contradictory. After the failure of first-line treatment, targeted therapies can be offered if the molecular targets microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), IDH1, FGFR2, BRAF V600E, and NTRK are detected. These targeted agents are generally preferable to second-line chemotherapy. Broad molecular testing should be performed, preferably from tumor tissue, at the initiation of first-line therapy to timely identify potential molecular targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Medical Science) is the property of Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Medical Science) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive carcinoma with a dismal prognosis. For the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, cisplatin/gemcitabine has been the standard of care for more than 10 years. Its combination with the immune checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab resulted in an efficiency improvement in the phase III setting. Regarding the use of chemotherapy in the second line, positive phase III data could only be generated for FOLFOX. The evidence base for nanoliposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) is contradictory. After the failure of first-line treatment, targeted therapies can be offered if the molecular targets microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), IDH1, FGFR2, BRAF V600E, and NTRK are detected. These targeted agents are generally preferable to second-line chemotherapy. Broad molecular testing should be performed, preferably from tumor tissue, at the initiation of first-line therapy to timely identify potential molecular targets.

IntroductionSystemic inflammatory markers have been validated as prognostic factors for patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC). The aim of this study was to evaluate specific immunologic prognostic markers and immune responses by analyzing preoperative plasma samples from a large prospectively collected biobank.MethodsExpression of 92 proteins representing adaptive and innate immune responses was investigated in plasma from 102 patients undergoing resection for BTC 2009-2017 (perihilar cholangiocarcinoma n=46, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma n=27, gallbladder cancer n=29), by means of a high-throughput multiplexed immunoassay. Association with overall survival was analyzed by Cox regression, with internal validation and calibration. Tumor tissue bulk and single-cell gene expression of identified markers and receptors/ligands was analyzed in external cohorts.ResultsThree preoperative plasma markers were independently associated with survival: TRAIL, TIE2 and CSF1, with hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) 0.30 (0.16-0.56), 2.78 (1.20-6.48) and 4.02 (1.40-11.59) respectively. The discrimination of a preoperative prognostic model with the three plasma markers was assessed with concordance-index 0.70, while the concordance-index of a postoperative model with histopathological staging was 0.66. Accounting for subgroup differences, prognostic factors were assessed for each type of BTC. TRAIL and CSF1 were prognostic factors in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. In independent cohorts, TRAIL-receptor expression was higher in tumor tissue and seen in malignant cells, with TRAIL and CSF1 expressed by intra- and peritumoral immune cells. Intratumoral TRAIL-activity was decreased compared to peritumoral immune cells, while CSF1-activity was increased. The highest CSF1 activity was seen in intratumoral macrophages, while the highest TRAIL-activity was seen in peritumoral T-cells.DiscussionIn conclusion, three preoperative immunological plasma markers were prognostic for survival after surgery for BTC, providing good discrimination, even compared to postoperative pathology. TRAIL and CSF1, prognostic factors in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, showed marked differences in expression and activity between intra- and peritumoral immune cells.

Simple Summary: Non-resectable biliary tract cancer is incurable. The balance between last-line treatment, with limited improvement in survival, and potential adverse events calls for prognostic biomarkers aiding the decision making process. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical impact of the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), methylated homeobox A9, in plasma from 39 patients receiving erlotinib and bevacizumab for non-resectable biliary tract cancer. Treatment effect and adverse events were also investigated. The study found an increase in ctDNA after one treatment cycle implying that the biomarker is negatively associated with survival in patients with late stage BTC. Methylated homeobox A9 (meth-HOXA9) is tumor specific and has been suggested as a prognostic biomarker in several types of cancer. ctDNA measured as meth-HOXA9 may be a valuable biomarker in the decision-making process about last-line treatment of biliary tract cancer (BTC). The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical impact of meth-HOXA9 in plasma from patients receiving erlotinib and bevacizumab for late-stage BTC and to investigate the treatment effect and adverse events. Droplet digital PCR was applied to detect meth-HOXA9 in 39 patients. Response rates were registered according to RECIST (1.1) and adverse events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAE (4.0)). Endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity. A significant difference in PFS and OS between patients with increasing and non-increasing meth-HOXA9 was detected after one treatment cycle, hazard ratio (HR) 12.4 (p < 0.0001) and HR 2.75 (p = 0.04), respectively. The most common adverse events of erlotinib were fatigue, pain, and rash, and those of bevacizumab were bleeding and wounds. This study found meth-HOXA9 to be negatively associated with survival in patients with late-stage BTC. Hence, meth-HOXA9 may guide early discontinuation of ineffective treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand (anti-PD1/PDL1) have been proposed as a promising therapeutic option for advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). Given the scarce quantitative analyses of anti-PD1/PDL1 in aBTC, we thus did a meta-analysis to assess the benefits and risks of this emerging treatment strategy in patients with aBTC. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and meeting resources were searched for relevant studies. The main endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), any-grade adverse events (AEs), and grade 3–4 AEs. Results: Twenty-eight studies with 1,338 participants were included. The best curative effect was found in the anti-PD1/PDL1 combined with anti-CTLA4 and chemotherapy group (mPFS: 12.4 months; mOS: 16.0 months; ORR: 45.1%; DCR: 95.0%), followed by the anti-PD1/PDL1 plus chemotherapy group (mPFS: 8.2 months; mOS: 14.8 months; ORR: 36.3%; DCR: 84.6%), the anti-PD1/PDL1 plus antiangiogenesis group (mPFS: 4.9 months; mOS: 10.2 months; ORR: 17.5%; DCR: 68.7%), the anti-PD1/PDL1 plus anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (anti-CTLA4) group (mPFS: 2.9 months; mOS: 8.3 months; ORR: 9.9%; DCR: 36.8%), and the anti-PD1/PDL1 monotherapy group (mPFS: 2.5 months; mOS: 7.6 months; ORR: 6.8%; DCR: 34.7%). Compared with anti-PD1-containing regimens, anti-PDL1-containing regimens achieved preferable mPFS (11.1 vs. 3.8 months), mOS (12.2 vs. 9.8 months), and ORR (23.7% vs. 17.4%), despite a similar DCR (61.1% vs. 61.3%). The mPFS, mOS, ORR, and DCR were 10.6 months, 15.8 months, 42.3%, and 88.6% of first-line anti-PD1/PDL1 and 3.0 months, 9.1 months, 11.6%, and 51.1% of second-line therapy or beyond, respectively. There were 80.6% and 34.0% of the patients suffering any-grade AEs and grade 3–4 AEs. Anti-PD1/PDL1 monotherapy might be considered as a safer alternative than combination regimens. Meanwhile, obvious toxicities in the first-line setting could not be neglected. Conclusions: Anti-PD1/PDL1 showed encouraging efficacy and acceptable safety profile in aBTC and, thus, could be an alternative treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundAnti-programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand (anti-PD1/PDL1) have been proposed as a promising therapeutic option for advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). Given the scarce quantitative analyses of anti-PD1/PDL1 in aBTC, we thus did a meta-analysis to assess the benefits and risks of this emerging treatment strategy in patients with aBTC.MethodsPubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and meeting resources were searched for relevant studies. The main endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), any-grade adverse events (AEs), and grade 3–4 AEs.ResultsTwenty-eight studies with 1,338 participants were included. The best curative effect was found in the anti-PD1/PDL1 combined with anti-CTLA4 and chemotherapy group (mPFS: 12.4 months; mOS: 16.0 months; ORR: 45.1%; DCR: 95.0%), followed by the anti-PD1/PDL1 plus chemotherapy group (mPFS: 8.2 months; mOS: 14.8 months; ORR: 36.3%; DCR: 84.6%), the anti-PD1/PDL1 plus antiangiogenesis group (mPFS: 4.9 months; mOS: 10.2 months; ORR: 17.5%; DCR: 68.7%), the anti-PD1/PDL1 plus anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (anti-CTLA4) group (mPFS: 2.9 months; mOS: 8.3 months; ORR: 9.9%; DCR: 36.8%), and the anti-PD1/PDL1 monotherapy group (mPFS: 2.5 months; mOS: 7.6 months; ORR: 6.8%; DCR: 34.7%). Compared with anti-PD1-containing regimens, anti-PDL1-containing regimens achieved preferable mPFS (11.1 vs. 3.8 months), mOS (12.2 vs. 9.8 months), and ORR (23.7% vs. 17.4%), despite a similar DCR (61.1% vs. 61.3%). The mPFS, mOS, ORR, and DCR were 10.6 months, 15.8 months, 42.3%, and 88.6% of first-line anti-PD1/PDL1 and 3.0 months, 9.1 months, 11.6%, and 51.1% of second-line therapy or beyond, respectively. There were 80.6% and 34.0% of the patients suffering any-grade AEs and grade 3–4 AEs. Anti-PD1/PDL1 monotherapy might be considered as a safer alternative than combination regimens. Meanwhile, obvious toxicities in the first-line setting could not be neglected.ConclusionsAnti-PD1/PDL1 showed encouraging efficacy and acceptable safety profile in aBTC and, thus, could be an alternative treatment.

Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) and cisplatin (CDDP) combination therapy (GC therapy) is the standard 1st-line regimen for incurable biliary tract cancers (BTCs). However, the correlation between dynamic changes in renal function and the outcomes of GC therapy remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the association between renal function alterations and treatment outcomes after GC therapy., Methods: We retrospectively examined 44 patients with incurable BTC who underwent GC therapy (January 2015 to December 2022). The patients were stratified according to their baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Changes in eGFR, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: The median baseline eGFRs were 65.0 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (low group, n=22) and 90.7 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (high group, n=22). No significant background differences were observed between the groups. During the 1st course, 86.4% and 54.5% of patients in the low and high groups underwent dose adjustments and/or administration postponement, which was found to be significantly greater in the low group. In the high group, eGFR decreased with an increase in the CDDP dose (100 mg =-12.0, 200 mg =-12.7, 300 mg =-25.9, and 400 mg =-25.7 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). In the low group, eGFR remained stable (100 mg =0.8, 200 mg =7.5, 300 mg =4.5, and 400 mg =-0.3 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). The decrease in the eGFR in the high group was significantly greater at each CDDP dose. However, the median OS and PFS were longer in the low group (OS: 16.3 vs. 9.2 months, P=0.02; PFS: 5.4 vs. 3.6 months, P=0.02). No significant differences in adverse events were observed between the groups., Conclusions: Adjusting GC therapy based on baseline estimated glomerular eGFR may be pivotal for therapeutic benefits and renal function protection in patients with incurable BTC., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-24-330/coif). Dr. Takuo Yamai reports honoraria for lectures from Boston Scientific and MSD, and for manuscript writing from Kaneka. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 AME Publishing Company. All rights reserved.)

Predictive prognostic markers for immunotherapy are crucial and desperately required for clinical precise medicine. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy of anti‐PD‐1 (programmed cell death protein 1) treatment and find the therapeutic prognostic biomarkers in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). A total of 60 patients of advanced BTC who received at least one dose of anti‐PD‐1 therapy between June 2016 and October 2019 were recruited and followed up till April 2020. Systemic immune‐inflammation index (SII) and neutrophils‐to‐lymphocytes ration (NLR) were obtained from the routine circulating hematologic analysis before treatment. Serum 45‐Plex Panel cytokines were detected using multiplexed bead immunoassays. Logistic regression nomogram was used to construct the algorithm model for prognosis prediction. Of the 60 patients, the overall benefit rate (OBR) was 38.3%, the median progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 4.0 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.28–5.72) and 13.0 mo (95% CI: 8.05–17.95), respectively. High levels of SII (≥720), NLR (≥4.3) and cytokine IFN‐inducible protein‐10 (IP‐10; ≥45 pg/ml) indicated worse OS. Those with high SII (≥720) and high IP‐10 (≥45 pg/ml) also had shorter PFS. The nomogram algorithm combining above three independent factors (SII, IP‐10, and macrophage inflammatory protein‐1β) had better efficacy in predicting OBR. Our study offers a simple, affordable, and noninvasive method to help physicians predict therapeutic response in BTC patients receiving anti‐PD‐1 antibody treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Selecting proper postoperative adjuvant therapy is of great importance for prolonging overall survival (OS) of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC). OS is commonly affected by high rate of postoperative recurrence and metastasis.Purpose: The present study aimed to identify the optimal adjuvant therapy for BTC patients.Method: A comprehensive search was carried out on Pubmed, Web of science, and Embase databases to acquire articles regarding BTC therapy approaches. Subsequently, the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to evaluate the efficacy of different adjuvant therapy regimens. The GemTc (GemTc.0.8-2) and R (R.3.6.0) software were employed to perform statistical analyses.Result: Data from 22 articles, including 14,646 patients, were quantitatively analyzed. The results showed that in terms of 5-year OS, gemcitabine (GEM) was considered as the optimal adjuvant therapy for BTC compared with chemoradiotherapy (CRT; HR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.34-0.97), observation (OB; HR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.33-0.73), and radiotherapy (RT; HR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.22-0.71). Additionally, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) exhibited improved efficacy compared with RT (HR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.29-0.91) and OB (HR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.43-0.92). When the efficacy of 5-FU was compared with that of GEM, the results showed that 5-FU (HR = 1.29) was more effective than GEM. Furthermore, CRT and RT prolonged positive resection margin (R+)-OS (HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.49-1.00) and positive lymph node-(N+)-OS (HR = 0.22; 95% CI = 0.074-0.66) in BTC patients. In terms of median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 1-year OS, the differences were not statistically significant among different therapeutic interventions.Conclusion: The present study suggested that GEM could be used as a first-line adjuvant therapy for resected BTC patients. Additionally, CRT could be the optimal treatment approach for R+ and N+ patients.

Background: Selecting proper postoperative adjuvant therapy is of great importance for prolonging overall survival (OS) of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC). OS is commonly affected by high rate of postoperative recurrence and metastasis. Purpose: The present study aimed to identify the optimal adjuvant therapy for BTC patients. Method: A comprehensive search was carried out on Pubmed, Web of science, and Embase databases to acquire articles regarding BTC therapy approaches. Subsequently, the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to evaluate the efficacy of different adjuvant therapy regimens. The GemTc (GemTc.0.8-2) and R (R.3.6.0) software were employed to perform statistical analyses. Result: Data from 22 articles, including 14,646 patients, were quantitatively analyzed. The results showed that in terms of 5-year OS, gemcitabine (GEM) was considered as the optimal adjuvant therapy for BTC compared with chemoradiotherapy (CRT; HR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.34-0.97), observation (OB; HR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.33-0.73), and radiotherapy (RT; HR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.22-0.71). Additionally, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) exhibited improved efficacy compared with RT (HR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.29-0.91) and OB (HR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.43-0.92). When the efficacy of 5-FU was compared with that of GEM, the results showed that 5-FU (HR = 1.29) was more effective than GEM. Furthermore, CRT and RT prolonged positive resection margin (R+)-OS (HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.49-1.00) and positive lymph node-(N+)-OS (HR = 0.22; 95% CI = 0.074-0.66) in BTC patients. In terms of median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 1-year OS, the differences were not statistically significant among different therapeutic interventions. Conclusion: The present study suggested that GEM could be used as a first-line adjuvant therapy for resected BTC patients. Additionally, CRT could be the optimal treatment approach for R+ and N+ patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract In this study, we determined the efficacy of the cell death biomarker cytokeratin 18 for diagnosing biliary tract cancer (BTC). We recruited 36 patients with BTC (Malignant group) and 45 patients with benign biliary tract disease (Benign group) for this study. We used M30 and M65 as cell death biomarkers. M30 levels indicate apoptosis, and M65 levels indicate both apoptosis and necrosis. M30 and M65 levels were significantly higher in the Malignant group than in the Benign group (142.4 ± 117.0 vs 48.9 ± 71.2 U/l, P

Abstract Background Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a subtype of biliary tract cancer (BTC). Recently, downsizing chemotherapy has been applied to initially unresectable BTCs, including ICC. Case presentation We report a case of liver resection in a 23-year-old woman who was diagnosed with initially unresectable ICC attached to the inferior vena cava, with portal vein (PV) cavernous transformation. Positron emission tomography (PET) showed fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the para-aortic lymph nodes. Upon using downsizing chemotherapy (the combination of gemcitabine [GEM] and cisplatin [CDDP]), the size of tumor reduced by 55% and FDG uptake in the para-aortic lymph node metastases disappeared. A right hemihepatectomy was performed, along with dissection of lymph nodes, including the para-aortic lymph nodes. The PV cavernous transformation was preserved to maintain collateral flow as much as possible, as it was considered to originate from a congenital anomaly. Pathological examination revealed that R0 resection was performed and that there were no viable neoplastic cells remaining in the para-aortic lymph nodes. The patient is alive at 31 months after initial treatment, with a local recurrence. Conclusion Downsizing chemotherapy with GEM plus CDDP followed by radical surgical resection is an attractive treatment for initially unresectable BTC.

Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a common malignant tumor of the biliary system. It is characterised by insidious onset, rapid progression and poor prognosis. Symptoms often indicate advanced or late-stage disease, with a 5-year survival rate of only 5-15%., Case Description: We present a case study of a patient with GBC who had a tumor mutation burden (TMB) of 32.5/MB (≥10 muts/MB). The patient received mFOLFIRINOX as first-line chemotherapy, which demonstrated significant efficacy. After stabilizing the disease, a sequential chemotherapy regimen was chosen. This regimen combined the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) toripalimab (JS001), a humanised IgG4 monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), with S-1 therapy, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative. However, this treatment did not provide any significant clinical benefit for the patient. Therefore, we hypothesise that combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy may be more effective as a first line treatment for high-TMB advanced GBC. This hypothesis needs to be validated in large-scale clinical studies., Conclusions: In summary, mFOLFIRINOX is a safe and effective first-line chemotherapy regimen for advanced GBC. The timing of combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy requires careful consideration. Further clinical trials involving immunotherapy in advanced GBC are necessary to identify biomarkers that can guide clinical decisions., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://acr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/acr-23-188/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 AME Case Reports. All rights reserved.)

Background: Biliary tract cancers are rare, aggressive neoplasms. Most patients present with advanced/unresectable or metastatic disease at diagnosis, and no second-line regimen has demonstrated clinical benefit. This was a phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in patients who had advanced/unresectable or metastatic disease after receiving standard therapy.Methods: In this single arm-study, patients with advanced/unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer who failed at least 1 line of systemic chemotherapy received regorafenib once daily on a schedule of 21-days on/7-days off in a 28-day cycle. Patients initially received a standard 160 mg dose. After toxicity assessments in the first 3 patients, the dose was reduced to 120 mg for subsequent patients, as preplanned. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), the objective response rate, and the disease control rate.Results: Forty-three patients received at least 1 dose of regorafenib, and 34 patients who received at least 1 cycle of treatment were evaluable for tumor response. The median PFS was 15.6 weeks (90% confidence interval, 12.9-24.7 weeks), and the median OS was 31.8 weeks (90% confidence interval, 13.3-74.3 weeks), with survival rates 40% at 12 months and 32% at 18 months. A partial response was achieved in 5 patients (11%), and 19 had stable disease (44%), for a disease control rate of 56%. The toxicity profile was as expected, with grade 3 and 4 adverse events reported in 40% of patients. The most common toxicities were hypophosphatemia (40%), hyperbilirubinemia (26%), hypertension (23%), and hand-foot skin reaction (7%).Conclusions: The current results suggest promising efficacy of regorafenib in patients with chemotherapy-refractory, advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancer, warranting further studies to confirm its clinical efficacy. There is a clear unmet need for effective therapies in patients who have advanced and metastatic biliary tract cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents a group of epithelial cell tumors classified based on their anatomic location along the biliary tree. This rare malignancy is often diagnosed at an advanced stage and deemed unresectable. Even for those patients who are surgical candidates, recurrence rates are high and survival rates low. The mainstay of therapy for advanced CCA remains cisplatin plus gemcitabine, with a median overall survival (mOS) under 12 months, although the TOPAZ-1 trial showed a survival benefit with the addition of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade. In recent years, molecular profiling has revealed a wealth of potentially targetable genetic alterations, including fibroblast growth factor receptor ( FGFR ) fusions, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 ( IDH1 ) mutations, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2 ) amplification and overexpression, and microsatellite instability (MSI). These discoveries have prompted numerous clinical trials employing drugs against these specific genetic changes. The foundation laid by early clinical studies and the landscape of ongoing trials are both summarized here. While the role of adjuvant therapy has yet to be defined in this disease, we emphasize the importance of employing targeted therapies in trials in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant spaces and discuss ways to overcome challenges due to low incidence of targetable mutations. Personalized medicine for this disease promises significant clinical benefit to patients, but further investigation is needed., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://hbsn.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/hbsn-22-563/coif). The series “Molecular, Protein, and Cellular Markers for HPB Cancers” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. S.K.M. serves as the unpaid editorial board member of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. All rights reserved.)

Patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) have a poor prognosis, and novel treatments are needed. Gemcitabine, the standard of care for BTC, induces DNA damage; however, the ability of cancer cells to repair DNA dampens its effects. To improve the efficacy of gemcitabine, we combined it with MK1775, a Wee1 inhibitor that prevents activation of the G2/M checkpoint. BTC cell lines were treated with gemcitabine only or in combination with MK1775 to determine the therapeutic potential of BTC. Gemcitabine inhibited the growth and induced the apoptosis of four BTC cell lines to a greater extent when added with MK1775 than when added alone. The effects of the combination treatment were observed in both p53 wild-type and p53 mutant cell lines and were unaffected by knockdown of wild-type p53. The combination treatment increased the percentage of apoptotic cells and decreased the percentage of cells synthesizing DNA, suggesting that it caused DNA-damaged cells to accumulate and possibly die in S phase. It did not induce apoptosis when cells were arrested in mitosis using nocodazole. In a xenograft mouse model, gemcitabine plus MK1775 (but not either alone) inhibited the growth of tumors generated from inoculated BTC cells. Our results show that MK1775 highly enhances gemcitabine cytotoxicity in BTC regardless of p53 status. We suggest that the combination treatment elicits a DNA damage response and consequent apoptosis. Our preclinical study provides a basis for future clinical trials of gemcitabine plus MK1775 in patients with BTC. [Display omitted] ● The enhanced antitumor activity of gemcitabine with MK1775 was observed both in vitro and in vivo. ● Combination treatment increased apoptosis and decreased DNA synthesis by accumulating DNA damage and replication stress in the S phase. ● Potentiation of Wee1 inhibition by MK1775 on gemcitabine in BTC cells was p53-independent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a subtype of biliary tract cancer (BTC). Recently, downsizing chemotherapy has been applied to initially unresectable BTCs, including ICC. Case presentation: We report a case of liver resection in a 23-year-old woman who was diagnosed with initially unresectable ICC attached to the inferior vena cava, with portal vein (PV) cavernous transformation. Positron emission tomography (PET) showed fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the para-aortic lymph nodes. Upon using downsizing chemotherapy (the combination of gemcitabine [GEM] and cisplatin [CDDP]), the size of tumor reduced by 55% and FDG uptake in the para-aortic lymph node metastases disappeared. A right hemihepatectomy was performed, along with dissection of lymph nodes, including the para-aortic lymph nodes. The PV cavernous transformation was preserved to maintain collateral flow as much as possible, as it was considered to originate from a congenital anomaly. Pathological examination revealed that R0 resection was performed and that there were no viable neoplastic cells remaining in the para-aortic lymph nodes. The patient is alive at 31 months after initial treatment, with a local recurrence. Conclusion: Downsizing chemotherapy with GEM plus CDDP followed by radical surgical resection is an attractive treatment for initially unresectable BTC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

HER2 amplification and/or activating variations of its protein, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), are associated with distinct clinical and pathological features in gastrointestinal tumors, including a worse overall prognosis and a higher incidence of metastastic lesions in the central nervous system. Notably, the role of HER2 as a therapeutic target continues to expand beyond the scope of breast and gastroesophageal tumors, now encompassing colorectal and biliary tract cancers (BTCs), among others. In parallel, there is a burgeoning array of therapeutic agents designed to inhibit the activity of the HER2 pathway, including monoclonal antibodies, orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugate compounds. In this comprehensive review, we will explore the current body of evidence that supports the implementation of HER2-targeting strategies in the treatment of patients with gastric, esophageal, colorectal, and biliary tract tumors. We will also describe testing methods for HER2 status in clinical practice, including immunohistochemistry (IHC), and its correlation with next-generation sequencing-based techniques. Additionally, we will review the key treatment-related adverse events associated with specific anti-HER2 agents, emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and effective management. Furthermore, a critical aspect of this exploration is determining the optimal treatment sequencing among the available therapies, which will be pivotal in enhancing treatment outcomes.

Background and Objective: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs), including cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer, are a relatively rare group of cancers with a poor prognosis. Over the past decade, the utilization of next-generation sequencing has led to the identification of multiple actionable somatic aberrations in BTCs. Subsequently, new therapies have been created to target these molecular alterations and have been incorporated into clinical practice. In this review, we outline therapies that have been previously studied, and those that are under investigation, to target genomic alterations with the goal of improving survival in patients with advanced disease., Methods: A literature search was performed to identify phase I, II, and III trials of targeted therapies in patients with advanced BTCs published between January 1, 2010 and October 1, 2022. Medline (via PubMed) and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant studies and 415 trials were identified. The search strategy was performed using keywords including: biliary tract cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, randomized trials, controlled trials, phase I, phase II, and phase III. Search results were imported into EndNote X 9.1., Key Content and Findings: Overall, immune checkpoint inhibitors, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) inhibitors, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapies have all shown promising results with regard to efficacy in patients with advanced BTCs studied in clinical trials. A number of other agents have also been studied in early-phase trials., Conclusions: Targeted agents can improve survival in patients with advanced BTCs and have substantially increased the number of potential therapeutic options in patients with refractory disease. The therapeutic landscape of targeted therapies for patients with advanced BTCs continues to evolve based on improvements in detection of genomic alterations.

Background: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated cancer with a high mortality rate. This study aimed to clarify the clinical features of BTC in individuals with LS and to discuss its management., Methods: We obtained data from genetically verified Japanese individuals with LS who were diagnosed at a single institution, between January 2003 and April 2021. Moreover, 21 individuals with sporadic BTC (n=15) and LS associated BTC (n=6) underwent microsatellite instability (MSI) testing., Results: Among 92 individuals with LS, 6 individuals with MLH1 variants developed BTCs (10 lesions, male/female, 2:1). The median age at diagnosis of initial BTC was 69 years (range, 34-78 years). Histological examination revealed a predominance of differentiated adenocarcinoma (89%). Then, 2 individuals had multiple BTCs. All available 7 BTC lesions showed high-frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI-H). MLH1 carriers showed a 7.2% cumulative risk of BTC development at an age of 70 years. Five of the six individuals died of BTC., Conclusions: MSI analysis could facilitate LS identification in individuals with BTC. Surveillance for BTC should be considered for MLH1 carriers in Japan., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-22-165/coif). KA had lecture fee from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD). The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2022 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Simple Summary: Utilization of cell free DNA for diagnosing and monitoring patients with biliary tract cancers is emerging and promising. The strength of the present study is in its description of a novel approach using bile rather than blood or tissue samples, which is particularly relevant in biliary tract cancers. This paper largely serves as a proof of concept that ctDNA from bile is potentially feasible. Although liquid biopsy of blood is useful for cancer diagnosis and prediction of prognosis, diagnostic and prognostic value of ctDNA in bile fluid for BTCs are not clear yet. To determine whether liquid biopsy for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can replace tissue biopsy when assessing somatic mutations in biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Bile samples were obtained from 42 patients with BTC. Matched formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples were obtained from 20 of these patients and matched plasma samples from 16 of them. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used for detection KRAS somatic mutation. KRAS mutations were identified in the bile ctDNA of 20 of 42 (48%) patients. Patients with mutant KRAS showed significantly worse survival than those with wild-type KRAS (2-year survival rates: 0% vs. 55.5%, respectively; p = 0.018). There was 80.0% mutational concordance between the paired bile ctDNA and FFPE samples, and 42.9% between the plasma and FFPE samples. On transcriptomic sequencing of one set of paired bile and FFPE samples, expression level of KRAS-associated signaling oncogenes in the bile and tissue samples showed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.991, p < 0.001). Liquid biopsy of bile reliably detect mutational variants within the bile ctDNA of BTC patients. These results suggest that bile is an effective biopsy fluid for ctDNA analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of our study was to explore the prognostic significance of the preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score and establish a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) and to achieve a more accurate prognostic risk stratification., Methods: Clinicopathological records of 371 patients who underwent surgical resection for biliary tract cancers (BTC) from December 2002 to December 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. The associations of the CONUT score with clinicopathological factors and OS were evaluated. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analysis were used to screen out independent predictors. A nomogram was developed and validated to estimate OS., Results: The CONUT score was an independent predictor of OS [hazard ratio 1.478, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.078-2.025, P=0.015]. And patients with a high CONUT score tended to have a poor prognosis with poor differentiation (P=0.011) of tumor cells and longer hospital stays (P=0.046). Besides the CONUT score, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, surgical method, and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC; 7th edition) TNM stage were contained in the final prognostic model. An OS nomogram was generated to visually predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS. The C-index was 0.714 (95% CI, 0.673-0.755) and 0.679 (95% CI, 0.616-0.742) in the development and validation cohort respectively. The nomogram provided superior discriminative power than the AJCC TNM staging system. The nomogram also demonstrated good risk stratification power in the entire cohort of BTC patients as well as for both BTC and surgical method subgroups., Conclusions: The nomogram based on the CONUT score can predict OS in patients with BTCs, and it performed better than the AJCC TNM staging system., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-6770). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a breakthrough in cancer treatment. However, they have rarely been used to treat biliary tract cancer (BTC). In the current study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) therapy used alone or in combination with chemotherapy or targeted therapy in the treatment of advanced BTC., Methods: Patients with advanced BTC who were treated either with anti-PD-1 therapy alone or anti-PD-1 therapy plus chemotherapy or targeted therapy between December, 2015 and October, 2017 were retrospectively screened for eligibility. Patients who had previously received treatment with any agent targeting T-cell co-stimulation or immune checkpoints were excluded. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety were evaluated., Results: A total of 37 patients were included in this study (15 cases in the monotherapy group and 22 cases in the combination group). Patients in the combination group had significantly longer OS [median, 8.2 vs. 3.6 months, HR 0.47 (0.20-1.10), P=0.011] and PFS (median, 3.9 vs. 2.0 months, HR 0.58 (0.28-1.19), P=0.034) than patients in the monotherapy group. The ORR was 18.2% (4/22) and 0% in the combination group and monotherapy group, respectively, and the difference was not significant (P=0.131). Furthermore, no significant difference was found between the two groups with respect to the incidence of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (P=0.388)., Conclusions: Anti-PD-1 therapy plus chemotherapy or targeted therapy is an effective and tolerable treatment for patients with advanced BTC and is promising as a first-line treatment or beyond., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jgo-20-562). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2020 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Background: Peroral cholangioscopy (POCS)-guided forceps biopsy is a method for diagnosing indeterminate biliary strictures and for the preoperative identification of the exact perihilar and distal margins of biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, POCS-guided forceps biopsy may result in an insufficient amount of specimen at times. Therefore, we evaluated the adequate tissue acquisition rate and the factors affecting the adequate tissue acquisition of POCS-guided forceps biopsy for the biliary tract., Methods: Patients who underwent POCS-guided forceps biopsy for biliary disease between September 2016 and October 2018 at our hospital were enrolled retrospectively. We evaluated the adequate tissue acquisition rate of POCS-guided forceps biopsy for the biliary lesion and that for non-stenotic bile duct. In addition, the factors affecting the adequate tissue acquisition rate of POCS-guided forceps biopsy were evaluated., Results: We enrolled 47 patients with biliary disease and performed POCS-guided forceps biopsy for biliary lesion and POCS-guided forceps mapping biopsy for non-stenotic bile duct in 40 and 36 patients, respectively. The adequate tissue acquisition rates of POCS-guided forceps biopsy for biliary lesions and that for non-stenotic bile duct were 86.4%, and 68.9%, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, age, and previous biliary stenting before POCS were factors affecting the adequate tissue acquisition rate of POCS-guided forceps biopsy for the biliary lesion. For non-stenotic bile duct, the location of the biliary lesion, endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), and procedure time of POCS were factors affecting the adequate tissue acquisition rate of POCS-guided forceps mapping biopsy., Conclusions: Previous biliary stenting was a factor affecting a low tissue acquisition rate of POCS-guided forceps biopsy for the biliary lesion. In the POCS-guided forceps mapping biopsy, the location of the biliary lesion, EST, and procedure time were factors affecting tissue acquisition rates., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2738). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.)

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a set of molecularly distinct and heterogeneous diseases. While cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the current standard of care for treatment-naïve and treatment-refractory unresectable disease, recently identified mutations driving oncologic development offer opportunities for targeted therapy. Currently, alterations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF), DNA damage repair, and HER2 pathways have demonstrated promising new therapeutic avenues, among others, and various studies have demonstrated clinical activity with targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors and/or antibodies. In this review, we will discuss the currently identified targets for therapy in BTCs and review currently available data regarding clinical development of treatment options in these molecularly distinct subsets.

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a group of rare, chemoresistant solid tumor malignancies that arise from the bile ducts. BTC are typically associated with poor outcomes. Most patients present with advanced disease, where treatment is palliative with platinum based cytotoxic therapy. Response to chemotherapy is variable with limited duration of response. A subset of patients that will receive durable and meaningful responses to platinum-based chemotherapy is deemed to be platinum sensitive. The availability and implementation of next-generation sequencing allowed genomic profiling of BTC, which have identified potential targetable somatic genetic aberrations, which include kinases (FGFR, BRAF, ALK, ERBB2), oncogenes (IDH1/2, CCND1) and tumor suppressor genes, including germline or somatic mutations involved in DNA damage response (DDR) genes. These genes include, but are not limited to: ATM, ATR, BRCA1/2, RAD51, PALB2, PTEN, FANC, NBN, EMSY, MRE11, ARID1A. In BTC, alterations in DDR genes are identified in up to 20% of patients, with a higher proportion identified in those with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Patients harboring mutations exhibit varying patterns of clinical behavior and response to therapy. The presence of these mutations typically predicts for susceptibility to DNA damaging chemotherapy, such as platinum agents.

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a rare malignancy with overall poor prognosis. There are limited options regarding systemic therapy for this disease and historically only multi-agent chemotherapy regimens achieve meaningful responses that are often short lived. In the past several years immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has been established as an effective systemic therapy option in many solid tumors. The BTC tumor microenvironment (TME) including immune cells (T cells, macrophages, dendritic cells and natural killer cells) and immune checkpoint expression has been characterized. Findings have clinical implications that suggest that this entity is potentially amenable to immunomodulation, including via checkpoint inhibition. Single agent ICI studies have only been reported in the past few years and have mostly targeted the checkpoints PD-1 and PD-L1. As in other tumor subtypes patients with rare mismatch repair deficiency or microsatellite instability appear to have exquisite sensitivity to checkpoint inhibition. Abstracts and published studies suggest modest but real responses in all subtypes including objective response rates (ORRs) in the 5-20% range and meaningful disease control. They have paved the way for novel combination trials featuring a variety of treatment strategies and agents that look to enhance ICI efficacy and create long- term responders.

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is comprised of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC) and gallbladder cancer (GBC). These tumors arise in the biliary epithelium, share histological characteristics and are associated with grim prognosis even when diagnosed at early stages. Moreover, its relatively low incidence in developed countries has precluded the development of clinical trials addressing specific differences among BTC subgroups in terms of their biology, treatment response and clinical outcomes. In this scenario, the development of effective treatment strategies for patients has been rather modest. To date, the combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine remains as the standard first line therapy in advanced disease and after progression to this regimen there are limited treatment options. Next generation sequencing (NGS) studies have assessed the distribution of driver genes and potentially actionable genomic alterations among ICC, EHC and GBC. Here, we outline genomic differences among these subsets and describe key milestones in order to develop novel targeted drugs against BTCs. Although the early results of several studies are promising, international collaboration is critical to conduct adequately-powered trials, enrolling patients from high-incidence countries.

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a heterogeneous group of epithelial neoplasms, with a poor prognosis. Advanced BTC remains a challenging, non-curable disease. Gemcitabine plus platinum chemotherapy is the standard of care as first-line (L1) therapy in this setting. Beyond failure of L1, available evidence to guide therapeutic decisions is scarce. Data from phase III studies are lacking and there is no validated strategy to date. In this review, we provide an overview of the systemic therapeutic options that can be proposed and unsolved questions in the management of patients with advanced BTC in the second-line (L2) setting. Criteria to select which patients should receive L2 therapy are ill defined and reliable prognostic tools and models to help estimate individual patient survival at the beginning of L2 are needed. Chemotherapy, mainly fluoropyrimidine-based yields modest survival results. There is insufficient evidence level to recommend a specific L2 chemotherapy regimen, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor and antiangiogenic agents failed to demonstrate any survival improvement in a non-selected patient population. In recent years, knowledge about BTC molecular heterogeneity has considerably increased with the advent of high-throughput genomic and transcriptomic analyses, opening new avenues for targeted therapies. Patients with BTC may be particularly good candidates for biomarker-driven therapy in clinical practice. Among the ongoing developments, targeting of FGFR and IDH mutations and immune therapies hold many promises for the next future. In future L2 clinical trials, patients should be carefully characterized and stratified according to prognostic factors, disease subtype, and genetic drivers., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: A Vienot has no conflicts of interest to declare; C Neuzillet is the PI of a clinical trial funded by AstraZeneca., (2019 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) is a group of malignancies that arise from the epithelial cells of the biliary tree. These cancers are typically classified by anatomic site of origin: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC), and gallbladder cancer (GBC). To date, complete surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment especially for earlier stage disease. Unfortunately, most patients present with advanced or metastatic disease, when systemic chemotherapy is the only treatment option. Due to the paucity of effective treatments, BTCs have a dismal prognosis. There is a tremendous need to better understand the disease biology, discover new therapies, and improve clinical outcomes for this challenging disease. Next-generation sequencing has produced a more accurate and detailed picture of the molecular signatures in BTCs. The three BTC histologic subtypes are, in fact, quite molecularly distinct. IHCC commonly contain FGFR2 fusions and IDH 1 and 2 mutations, whereas EHCC and GBC tend to carry mutations in EGFR, HER2, and MAPK pathway. In light of this emerging knowledge, clinical trials have become more biomarker-driven, which allows capturing of subsets of patients that are most likely to respond to certain therapies. Many new and promising targeted therapeutics are currently in the pipeline. Here we review the genetic landscape of BTCs while focusing on new molecular targets and targeted therapeutics currently being investigated in biomarker-driven clinical trials., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a heterogeneous group of cancers, which is composed of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECCA), gallbladder cancers and ampullary carcinomas. While all anatomic subgroups are treated uniformly, our understanding about the pathogenesis has allowed us to reason that each group represents a clinically and genetically diverse disease. The majority of patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease, where the standard treatment is combination systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. While most receive a clinical benefit from chemotherapy, patients eventually progress where no standardized therapies are available in the refractory setting. With the use of next generation sequencing, we have come to understand that ICCA is a diverse genomic disease with many actionable alterations that may serve as potential therapeutic targets. Further studies investigating the role of novel targeted agents (as a single agent or with combination chemotherapy) will hopefully provide additional treatment options for this highly lethal disease., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) are often treated with palliative chemotherapy (PC). Standard PC since 2010 is a cisplatin/gemcitabine doublet, with median overall survival (OS) of 11.7 months from the ABC-02 trial. Prior to this, our institutional standard was gemcitabine and fluoropyrimidine. The ABC-02 study used 8 cycles of PC as standard with treatment stopped even in the absence of disease progression, but some patients may benefit from continuing PC longer than 8 cycles., Methods: Patients treated with at least 2 cycles of PC for advanced BTC in Princess Margaret Cancer Centre between 1987 and 2015 were included, and divided into 2 groups for analysis-long-term responders (LTR) who received 9 or more cycles, and controls (2-8 cycles). Data was collected on demographics, clinicopathological features, PC regimen, toxicities, and survival. The primary outcome measure was OS, with secondary analyses including progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity rates between groups., Results: A total of 382 patients were identified, 123 who met the criteria for LTR and 259 who were included as controls. The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar, although more patients in the control group had gallbladder cancer or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma than LTR (P=0.024), and more patients in the LTR group were treated with combination chemotherapy regimens (93% vs. 82% in controls, P=0.003). The LTR patients had significantly longer PFS (median 13.3 vs. 4.1 months, P<0.001) and longer OS than controls (median 22.1 vs. 9.2 months, P<0.001). In LTR patients, 15% had a break from chemotherapy of 3 months or more and restarted the same regimen. The LTR patients reported higher rates of nausea, cutaneous and hematologic toxicity, but also more frequently went on to receive second-line chemotherapy (47% vs. 33%, P=0.007). In multivariable analysis of OS, LTR, good performance status and intrahepatic site of cancer were associated with better survival., Conclusions: From this institutional dataset, a significant proportion of patients continued chemotherapy past 8 cycles, and appeared to derive benefit from longer duration of treatment. Toxicity rates were higher in this group, but manageable as evidenced by second-line treatment rates. Discontinuation of chemotherapy for reasons other than toxicity or progression may result in loss of disease control and impact survival in this population; these data suggest the use of continued chemotherapy to disease progression in patients with advanced BTC is a favorable option., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are aggressive gastrointestinal malignancies that are associated with a poor prognosis. This rare group of tumors includes cancers of the gallbladder, intrahepatic, and extrahepatic biliary tree. Chronic inflammatory processes such as cholelithiasis and chronic bacterial infection of the biliary system remain the most common underlying risk factor although most cases occur sporadically. The majority of patients present with advanced disease accompanied by nonspecific symptoms, making BTCs a therapeutic challenge for clinicians. In patients with localized, resectable disease, the only potentially curative treatment is a complete resection with negative microscopic margins. Liver transplantation has been used in selected patients with peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma, with acceptable results. Recurrence rates remain high despite surgical treatment and 5-year survival rates range from 8-40% in patients treated with resection. In this review, we will summarize the current surgical management strategies for BTCs, focusing on the role of resection.