Search

The aim of this study was to confirm the role of screening by determining the percentage of clinically localized prostate cancer (stage A and B) in patients with prostate cancer detected on screening and in those presenting to urologic clinic for the symptoms of urination impairment or ostalgia. During the study, 1,000 men aged > or = 50 from the community of Cepin and village of Josipovac near Osijek were examined. The subjects with elevated concentration of total prostate specific antigen and/or digital rectal examination suspect of carcinoma underwent transperineal biopsy of the prostate. Clinical staging was performed in patients with prostate cancer detected on screening, and data on clinical staging for prostate cancer patients treated during the 1996-1997 period were retrieved from patient files of the Department of Urology, University Hospital "Osijek". On screening, 28 (80%) patients with localized prostate cancer and seven (20%) patients with metastases were detected. In the group of patients examined on an outpatient basis for the signs and symptoms of prostatism, there were 30 (83.4%) patients with metastases and only six (16.6%) patients with localized prostate cancer. Study results indicated that an early diagnosis of prostate cancer could be made by use of noninvasive and inexpensive methods that cause no major discomfort to the patient. Accordingly, these results appear to strongly support such screening in men, if not in all those aged over 50, then at least in the otherwise healthy, 50-70 age group.

This study compares the value of digital rectal examination (DRE) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) determination in the detection of prostate cancer. 1,000 men aged > or = 50 from the Osijek surroundings were examined. The subjects with prostatitis were excluded from the study. The subjects with elevated concentration of total prostate specific antigen and/or digital rectal examination suspect of carcinoma underwent prostate biopsy. The rate of prostate cancer detection showed to be 3.3% for PSA > 4 ng/ml, 2% for abnormal finding of DRE, and 3.7% for combination of the two methods. Out of 35 patients with prostate cancer detected, 19 had suspect DRE finding and 32 had PSA exceeding 4 ng/ml. Thus, PSA pointed to the diagnosis of prostate cancer in 91.4%, and abnormal finding of DRE in 54.2% of cases, the difference being statistically significant. The positive predictive value was 48.7% for abnormal finding of DRE, 47% for PSA > 4 ng/ml, and 80.0% for the combination of both. Although PSA determination detected a considerable proportion of tumors missed on DRE, the former alone was found to be insufficient as a screening method because of its inadequate sensitivity. When combined with digital rectal examination, the probability of prostate cancer detection increased considerably.