Search

Background: A structured approach involves systematic management of trauma patients. We aim to conduct an overview of reviews about the clinical efficacy and safety of structured approach (i.e., primary and secondary survey) by guideline checklist compared to non-structured approach (i.e. clinical examination); moreover, routine screening whole-body computer tomography (WBCT) was compared to non-routine WBCT in patients with suspected major trauma.Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to 3 May 2022. Systematic reviews (SRs) that investigated the use of a structured approach compared to a non-structured approach were eligible. Two authors independently extracted data, managed the overlapping of primary studies belonging to the included SRs and calculated the corrected covered area (CCA). The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.Results: We included nine SRs investigating two comparisons in stable trauma patients: structured approach vs non-structured approach (n = 1) and routine WBCT vs non-routine WBCT (n = 8). The overlap of included primary studies was generally high across outcomes (CCA ranged between 20.85 and 42.86%) with some discrepancies in the directions of effects across reviews. The application of a structured approach by checklist may improve adherence to guidelines (e.g. Advanced Trauma Life Support) during resuscitation and might lead to a reduction in mortality among severely injured patients as compared to clinical examination (Adjusted OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.30-0.89; p = 0.018; low certainty of evidence). The use of routine WBCT seems to offer little to no effects in reducing mortality and time spent in emergency room or department, whereas non-routine WBCT seems to offer little to no effects in reducing radiation dose, intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) and hospital LOS (low-to-moderate

Background: Fragility fractures are a major public health concern owing to their worrying and growing burden and their onerous burden upon health systems. There is now a substantial body of evidence that individuals who have already suffered a fragility fracture are at a greater risk for further fractures, thus suggesting the potential for secondary prevention in this field. Purpose: This guideline aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for recognizing, stratifying the risk, treating, and managing patients with fragility fracture. This is a summary version of the full Italian guideline. Methods: The Italian Fragility Fracture Team appointed by the Italian National Health Institute was employed from January 2020 to February 2021 to (i) identify previously published systematic reviews and guidelines on the field, (ii) formulate relevant clinical questions, (iii) systematically review literature and summarize evidence, (iv) draft the Evidence to Decision Framework, and (v) formulate recommendations. Results: Overall, 351 original papers were included in our systematic review to answer six clinical questions. Recommendations were categorized into issues concerning (i) frailty recognition as the cause of bone fracture, (ii) (re)fracture risk assessment, for prioritizing interventions, and (iii) treatment and management of patients experiencing fragility fractures. Six recommendations were overall developed, of which one, four, and one were of high, moderate, and low quality, respectively. Conclusions: The current guidelines provide guidance to support individualized management of patients experiencing non-traumatic bone fracture to benefit from secondary prevention of (re)fracture. Although our recommendations are based on the best available evidence, questionable quality evidence is still available for some relevant clinical questions, so future research has the potential to reduce uncertainty about the effects of intervention and the reasons for doing so at a r

Purpose:The effect of systemic hemostatic agents initiated during pre-hospital care of severely injured patients with ongoing bleeding or traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis was therefore conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of systemic hemostatic agents as an adjunctive therapy in people with major trauma and hemorrhage or TBI in the context of developing the Italian National Institute of Health guidelines on major trauma integrated management. Methods:PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to October 2021 for studies that investigated pre-hospital initiated treatment with systemic hemostatic agents. The certainty of evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, and the quality of each study was determined with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcome was overall mortality, and secondary outcomes included cause-specific mortality, health-related quality of life, any adverse effects and blood product use, hemorrhage expansion, and patient-reported outcomes. Results:Five trials of tranexamic acid (TXA) met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis. With a high certainty of evidence, when compared to placebo TXA reduced mortality at 24 h (relative risk = 0.83, 95% confidence interval = 0.73-0.94) and at 1 month among trauma patients (0.91, 0.85-0.97). These results depend on the subgroup of patients with significant hemorrhage because in the subgroup of TBI there are no difference between TXA and placebo. TXA also reduced bleeding death and multiple organ failure whereas no difference in health-related quality of life. Conclusion:Balancing benefits and harms, TXA initiated in the pre-hospital setting can be used for patients experiencing major trauma with significant hemorrhage since it reduces the risk of mortality at 24 h and one month with no difference in terms of adverse effects when compared to p

Background: Whether and to what extent the reported blood pressure (BP) lowering effects of renal denervation (RDN) are associated with a central sympathoinhibition is controversial. We examined this issue by performing a meta-analysis of the microneurographic studies evaluating the BP and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) responses to RDN in drug-resistant or uncontrolled hypertension (RHT). Methods: This analysis comprised 11 studies including a total of >400 RHT patients undergoing RDN and were followed up for 6 months. Evaluation was extended to the relationships of MSNA with clinic heart rate and BP changes associated with RDN. Results: MSNA showed a significant reduction after RDN (-4.78 bursts/100 heart beats; P<0.04), which was also accompanied by a significant systolic (-11.45 mm Hg; P<0.002) and diastolic (-5.24 mm Hg; P=0.0001) BP decrease. No significant quantitative relationship was found between MSNA and systolic (r=-0.96, P=0.19) or diastolic BP (r=-0.97, P=0.23) responses to RDN. This was also the case for clinic heart rate (r=0.53, P=0.78, respectively), whose post RDN values were not significant different from the pre-RDN ones. More than 10 renal nerves ablations were found to be needed for obtaining a significant sympathoinhibition. Conclusions: This meta-analysis, the first ever done on the MSNA responses to RDN, shows that in a consistent number of RHT patients RDN is associated with a significant, although modest, central sympathoinhibition, which appears to be unrelated to the BP lowering effects of the procedure. Thus factors other than the central sympathetic outflow inhibition may concur at the BP lowering effects of RDN.

Background: Hypofractionated proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) is gaining attention in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). However, there is a large unmet need to define indications, prescription doses and potential adverse events of protons in this clinical scenario. Hence, the present work aims to provide a critical literature revision, and to investigate associations between fractionation schedules/ biological effective doses (BEDs), oncological outcomes and toxicities.Materials and methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis complied with the PRISMA recommendations. Inclusion criteria were: 1) curative-intent hypofractionated PBT for ES-NSCLC (>= 3 Gy(RBE)/fraction), 2) report of the clinical outcomes of interest, 3) availability of full-text written in English. The bibliographic search was performed on the NCBI Pubmed, Embase and Scopus in September 2021; no other limitations were applied. The BED was calculated for each included study (alpha/beta = 10 Gy); the median BED for all studies was used as a threshold for stratifying selected evidence into "high" and "low"-dose subgroups. Heterogeneity was tested using chi-square statistics; inconsistency was measured with the I2 index. Pooled estimate was obtained by fitting both the fixed-effect and the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect model.Results: Eight studies and 401 patients were available for the meta-analysis; median follow-up was 32.8 months. The median delivered BED was 105.6 Gy(RBE). A BED >= 105.6 Gy(RBE) consistently provided superior OS, CSS, DFS and LC rates (i.e.: 4-year OS: 0.56 [0.34-0.76] for BED < 105.6 Gy(RBE) and 0.78 [0.64-0.88] for BED >= 105.6 Gy(RBE)). The meta-analysis of proportions showed a comparable probability of developing acute grade >= 2 toxicity between the two groups, while the probability of any late grade >= 2 event was almost three-times greater for BED >= 105.6 Gy(RBE), with rib fractures being more common in the high dose group.Concl

Objective: Whether and to what extent the reported BP lowering effects of renal denervation (RD) are mediated by a sympathetic deactivation induced by the procedure is still largely undefined. We examined this issue by performing a meta-analysis of the microneurographic studies published so far based on the evaluation of the blood pressure (BP) and muscle sympathetic nerve traffic (MSNA) responses to RD. Design and method: The meta-analysis was based on 12 studies including a total of 394 patients with resistant hypertension underwent RD and followed up to 12 months. Evaluation was extended to the relationships of MSNA with heart rate (HR) and clinic or ambulatory blood pressure (BP) values (expressed such as mean and 95% confidence interval). Results: Baseline MSNA values amounted to 48.25 (43.86-52.64) bursts/minute, clinic HR to 66.35 (65.02-67.67) beats/minute and systo/diastolic clinic BP to 167.3 (157.6-177.01) and 90.54 (84.81-96.27) mmHg. RD caused a significant BP reduction at 3/6/12 months following the procedure amounting to 12.6 mmHg for systolic (range 20.9 to 4.39 mmhg, p = 0.003) and to 6.4 mmHg for diastolic BP (range -11.9 t0 0.9 mmHg, p = 0.02) respectively. No significant change in MSNA (-2.65, range -6.7 to 1.4 bursts/minute, P = NS) and HR (-0.58, range -3.98 to 2.81 b/min, P = NS) were concomitantly observed. No relationship was found between the number of renal ablations and the magnitude of the blood pressure or MSNA changes, this being the case also for HR. Conclusions: This meta-analysis, the first ever done on the MSNA responses to RD, shows that in a consistent number of patients underwent RD, the BP lowering effects of the procedure are not accompanied by any significant change in 2 adrenergic markers, i.e. MSNA and HR, and thus appear not to be mediated by any sympathetic deactivation.

BACKGROUND: Studies based on microneurographic sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) recordings have shown that the sympathetic system is overactivated in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients but the relationship between MSNA and renal function and other risk factors has not been systematically reviewed in this population.DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: This meta-analysis compares MSNA in cardiovascular complications-free CKD patients (n = 638) and healthy individuals (n = 372) and assesses the relationship of MSNA with the eGFR, age, BMI and hemodynamic variables.RESULTS: In a global analysis, MSNA was higher in CKD patients than in healthy control individuals (P < 0.001). The difference in MSNA between patients and healthy individuals was more marked in end-stage kidney diseases patients than in stage 3A 3B CKD patients (P < 0.001). In an analysis combining patients and healthy individuals, MSNA rose gradually across progressively lower eGFR categories (P < 0.01). In separate meta-regression analyses in CKD patients and in healthy individuals, MSNA associated directly with age (CKD: r = 0.57, P = 0.022; healthy individuals: r = 0.71, P = 0.031) and with the BMI (r = 0.75, P = 0.001 and r = 0.93, P = 0.003). In both groups, MSNA correlated with heart rate (r = 0.77, P = 0.02 and r = 0.66, P = 0.01) but was unrelated to plasma norepinephrine.CONCLUSION: Independently of comorbidities, MSNA is markedly increased in CKD patients as compared with healthy individuals and it is related to renal function, age, the BMI and heart rate. Sympathetic activation intensifies as CKD progresses toward kidney failure and such an intensification is paralleled by a progressive rise in heart rate but it is not reflected by plasma norepinephrine.

Context: The optimal management of oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is still debated. Objective: The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to collect the available evidence to date to better define the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in selected patients with oligorecurrent PCa. Evidence acquisition: Study methodology complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). All prospective studies including PCa patients with nodal and/or bone oligometastases (one to five lesions) were considered eligible. Heterogeneity between study-specific estimates was tested using chi-square statistics and measured with the I2 index. A pooled estimate was obtained by fitting both fixed-effect and DerSimonian and Laird random-effect model. Evidence synthesis: Overall, six works (two randomized and the remainder observational) published between 2013 and 2020 were considered eligible. Globally, data from 445 patients were incorporated, of whom 396 were treated with SBRT (329 in observational studies and the remaining 67 in randomized ones). Regarding local progression-free survival (PFS), five studies reported values close to 100%, while one reported a value of 80% in the observation arm. The benefit in terms of biochemical PFS brought by SBRT was evident in all considered studies. Such a difference in cumulative probabilities between the intervention arm and the comparator arm is maintained even 24 mo after the baseline. All studies but one considered toxicity among the endpoints of interest. Most events were classified as either G1 or G2, and the only G ≥ 3 adverse event was reported in one trial. Conclusions: SBRT is highly cost effective, safe, and with an almost inexistent toxicity risk that makes it the perfect candidate for the optimal management of PCa oligometastatic patients. However, more solid data and a higher level of evidence are needed to affirm its role in the management of these patie

BACKGROUND: Neuroadrenergic overdrive occurs in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). However, the small sample size of the microneurographic studies, heterogeneity of the patients examined, presence of comorbidities, represented major weaknesses not allowing to precisely define the main features of the phenomenon, particularly in nonobese patients. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis evaluated 850 participants recruited in 26 microneurographic studies, based on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) quantification in uncomplicated OSAS of different clinical severity. METHODS: The evaluation was extended to the relationships of MSNA with heart rate (HR), anthropometric and blood pressure (BP) values, metabolic variables, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen saturation. RESULTS: MSNA is activated markedly and almost homogeneously between studies, showing a progressive increase from the healthy state to mild, moderate and severe OSAS (41.6, 48.3, 65.5 and 70.7 bursts/100 heart beats, respectively, P < 0.01). Of special interest are the findings that first, MSNA is significantly related to the AHI, a marker of OSAS severity (r = 0.55, P < 0.02) and O2 saturation but not to body weight and BMI, as it occurs in OSAS associated with obesity; and second, HR is significantly and directly related to MSNA and AHI (r = 0.56 and 0.46, P < 0.03 for both), thus representing a surrogate marker of the sympathetic overdrive. CONCLUSION: OSAS, even when uncomplicated by other cardiometabolic disease, displays a marked sympathetic activation, reflected by the MSNA and HR behavior, becoming a target of therapeutic interventions aimed at exerting sympathomoderating effects, such as continuous positive airway pressure.

OBJECTIVE: The microneurographic technique has shown that sympathetic overactivity may characterize patients with the metabolic syndrome. However, technical and methodological limitations of the studies prevented to draw definite conclusions. The present meta-analysis evaluated 16 microneurographic studies including 650 individuals, 444 metabolic syndrome patients and 206 healthy controls, respectively. The analysis was primarily based on muscle sympathetic nerve traffic (MSNA) quantified by microneurography in metabolic syndrome. METHODS: Assessment was extended to the relationships of MSNA with an indirect neuroadrenergic marker, such as heart rate (HR), anthropometric variables, as BMI, waist-hip ratio and metabolic profile. RESULTS: Metabolic syndrome individuals displayed MSNA values (means ± SEM) significantly greater than controls (58.6 ± 4.8 versus 41.6 ± 4.1 bursts/100 heart beats, P < 0.01). This result was independent on the concomitant presence of sleep apnea and drug treatment. MSNA was directly and significantly related to clinic SBP (r = 0.91, P < 0.01) but not to BMI (r = 0.17, P = NS), whereas no significant relationship was found between MSNA and metabolic variables included in the definition of metabolic syndrome. No significant correlation was found between MSNA and HR. CONCLUSION: These data provide evidence that metabolic syndrome is characterized by a marked increase (about 30%) in MSNA. They also show that among the variables included in metabolic syndrome definition and related to the sympathetic overdrive blood pressure appears to be the most important one, at variance from what described in obesity in which metabolic and anthropometric factors play a major role. Finally in metabolic syndrome HR does not appear to represent a faithful mirror of the occurring sympathetic activation.

Nerve traffic recordings (muscle sympathetic nerve traffic [MSNA]) have shown that sympathetic activation may occur in obesity. However, the small sample size of the available studies, presence of comorbidities, heterogeneity of the subjects examined represented major weaknesses not allowing to draw definite conclusions. This is the case for the overweight state. The present meta-analysis evaluated 1438 obese or overweight subjects recruited in 45 microneurographic studies. The analysis was primarily based on MSNA quantification in obesity and overweight, excluding as concomitant conditions hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and other comorbidities. Assessment was extended to the relationships of MSNA with other neuroadrenergic markers, such as plasma norepinephrine and heart rate, anthropometric variables, as body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, presence/absence of obstructive sleep apnea, and metabolic profile. Compared with normoweights MSNA was significantly greater in overweight and more in obese individuals (37.0±4.1 versus 43.2±3.5 and 50.4±5.0 burts/100 heartbeats, P<0.01). This was the case even in the absence of obstructive sleep apnea. MSNA was significantly directly related to body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio (r=0.41 and r=0.64, P<0.04 and <0.01, respectively), clinic blood pressure (r=0.68, P<0.01), total cholesterol, LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol, and triglycerides (r=0.91, r=0.94, and r=0.80, respectively, P<0.01) but unrelated to plasma insulin, glucose, and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance. No significant correlation was found between MSNA, heart rate, and norepinephrine. Thus, obesity and overweight are characterized by sympathetic overactivity which mirrors the severity of the clinical condition and reflects metabolic alterations, with the exclusion of glucose/insulin profile. Neither heart rate nor norepinephrine appear to represent faithful markers of the muscle sympathetic overdrive.