Search

BackgroundAlmost all patients with malignant mesothelioma eventually have disease progression after first-line therapy. Previous studies have investigated maintenance therapy, but none has shown a great effect. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of switch-maintenance gemcitabine in patients with malignant mesothelioma without disease progression after first-line chemotherapy.MethodsWe did a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial in 18 hospitals in the Netherlands (NVALT19). We recruited patients aged older than 18 years with unresectable malignant mesothelioma with no evidence of disease progression after at least four cycles of first-line chemotherapy (with platinum and pemetrexed), who had a WHO performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function, and measurable or evaluable disease. Exclusion criteria were active uncontrolled infection or severe cardiac dysfunction, serious disabling conditions, symptomatic CNS metastases, radiotherapy within 2 weeks before enrolment, and concomitant use of any other drugs under investigation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using the minimisation method, to maintenance intravenous gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, in cycles of 21 days) plus supportive care, or to best supportive care alone, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, serious intercurrent illness, patient request for discontinuation, or need for any other anticancer agent, except for palliative radiotherapy. A CT scan of the thorax or abdomen (or both) and pulmonary function tests were done at baseline and repeated every 6 weeks. The primary outcome was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all participants who received one or more doses of the study drug or had at least one visit for supportive care. Recruitment is now closed; treatment and follow-up are ongoing. This study is registered with the Netherlands Trial Registry, NTR4132/NL3847.FindingsBetween March 20, 2014, and Feb 27, 2019, 130 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to gemcitabine plus supportive care (65 patients [50%]) or supportive care alone (65 patients [50%]). No patients were lost to follow-up; median follow-up was 36·5 months (95% CI 34·2 to not reached), and one patient in the supportive care group withdrew consent. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the gemcitabine group (median 6·2 months [95% CI 4·6-8·7]) than in the supportive care group (3·2 months [2·8-4·1]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·48 [95% CI 0·33-0·71]; p=0·0002). The benefit was confirmed by masked independent central review (HR 0·49 [0·33-0·72]; p=0·0002). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 33 (52%) of 64 patients in the gemcitabine group and in ten (16%) of 62 patients in the supportive care group. The most frequent adverse events were anaemia, neutropenia, fatigue or asthenia, pain, and infection in the gemcitabine group, and pain, infection, and cough or dyspnoea in the supportive care group. One patient (2%) in the gemcitabine group died, due to a treatment-related infection.InterpretationSwitch-maintenance gemcitabine, after first-line chemotherapy, significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with best supportive care alone, among patients with malignant mesothelioma. This study confirms the activity of gemcitabine in treating malignant mesothelioma.FundingDutch Cancer Society (Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds voor de Nederlandse Kankerbestrijding) and Stichting NVALT studies.

Introduction: Docetaxel and erlotinib are registered second line treatments for wild-type EGFR NSCLC. Previous studies suggested a predictive value of the VeriStrat test in second line therapy of NSCLC, classifying patients as either VeriStrat good or VeriStrat poor. EMPHASIS-lung aimed at exploring this predictive effect in patients with squamous cell NSCLC. The trial closed prematurely because of low accrual and results from other trials. Our analysis includes an exploratory combined analysis with results from the PROSE trial.Methods: EMPHASIS-lung was a randomized phase III multicenter trial exploring the differential effect of second line erlotinib versus docetaxel on progression-free survival (PFS) in VeriStrat good versus VeriStrat poor patients with squamous cell NSCLC.Results: A total of 80 patients were randomized, with 72.5% categorized as VeriStrat good. Patient characteristics were balanced between VeriStrat status and treatment groups. The median PFS times with docetaxel and erlotinib treatment in the VeriStrat good cohort were 4.1 and 1.6 months, respectively, versus 1.9 and 2.1 months, respectively, in the VeriStrat poor cohort. The median overall survival (OS) times with docetaxel and erlotinib treatment in the VeriStrat good cohort were 7.8 and 8.4 months, respectively, and 4.4 and 5.2 months, respectively, in the VeriStrat poor cohort. An additional exploratory analysis was performed; in it, 47 patients from the squamous cell subgroup of PROSE were included in a combined analysis, contributing with 45 PFS and 41 OS events.Conclusions: The final analysis of EMPHASIS-lung did not show a differential effect on PFS for erlotinib versus docetaxel stratified by VeriStrat status. Similarly, in the combined analysis, no significant treatment by VeriStrat status interaction was observed (interaction p=0.24 for PFS and 0.45 for OS, stratified by study). (C) 2017 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Introduction Docetaxel and erlotinib are registered second-line treatments for wild-type EGFR NSCLC. Previous studies suggested a predictive value of the VeriStrat test in second-line therapy of NSCLC, classifying patients as either VeriStrat good or VeriStrat poor. EMPHASIS-lung aimed at exploring this predictive effect in patients with squamous cell NSCLC. The trial closed prematurely because of low accrual and results from other trials. Our analysis includes an exploratory combined analysis with results from the PROSE trial. Methods EMPHASIS-lung was a randomized phase III multicenter trial exploring the differential effect of second-line erlotinib versus docetaxel on progression-free survival (PFS) in VeriStrat good versus VeriStrat poor patients with squamous cell NSCLC. Results A total of 80 patients were randomized, with 72.5% categorized as VeriStrat good. Patient characteristics were balanced between VeriStrat status and treatment groups. The median PFS times with docetaxel and erlotinib treatment in the VeriStrat good cohort were 4.1 and 1.6 months, respectively, versus 1.9 and 2.1 months, respectively, in the VeriStrat poor cohort. The median overall survival (OS) times with docetaxel and erlotinib treatment in the VeriStrat good cohort were 7.8 and 8.4 months, respectively, and 4.4 and 5.2 months, respectively, in the VeriStrat poor cohort. An additional exploratory analysis was performed; in it, 47 patients from the squamous cell subgroup of PROSE were included in a combined analysis, contributing with 45 PFS and 41 OS events. Conclusions The final analysis of EMPHASIS-lung did not show a differential effect on PFS for erlotinib versus docetaxel stratified by VeriStrat status. Similarly, in the combined analysis, no significant treatment by VeriStrat status interaction was observed (interaction p = 0.24 for PFS and 0.45 for OS, stratified by study). © 2017 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

This study aimed to investigate which factors were associated with the administration of chemotherapy for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and their relation to survival at a population-based level. All patients with NSCLC stage IV from 2001 to 2012 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry in the Eindhoven area (n=5,428). Chemotherapy use and survival were evaluated by logistic and Cox regression analyses, respectively. The proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy increased from 30% in 2001 to 48% in 2012. Higher rates were found among younger patients [multivariable odds ratio (OR64_vs._75_years): 1.8 (95%CI 1.6-2.1)], high socioeconomic status [ORhigh_vs._low: 1.8 (95%CI 1.6-2.2)], no comorbidity [OR0_vs._2: 1.5 (95%CI 1.3-1.8)], diagnosed in recent years [OR2010-2012_vs._2001-2003: 2.0 (95%CI 1.6-2.3)] and adenocarcinoma [ORsquamous_vs._adenocarcinoma: 0.8 (95%CI 0.6-0.9)]. Having liver metastasis was associated with reduced odds (ORliver_vs._brain: 0.8 (95%CI 0.7-1.0). The variation between hospitals was large, up to OR 2.0 (95%CI 1.5-2.6). Median survival increased from 18 weeks in 2001-2003 to 21 weeks in 2010-2012 (log-rank p=0.007), and was 35 weeks in patients with and 10 weeks without chemotherapy. The multivariable hazard of death reduced significantly over time [HR2001-2003_vs._2010-2012: 1.1 (95%CI 1.0-1.2), HR2004-2005_vs._2010-2012: 1.2 (95%CI 1.1-1.3)] and only remained significant for 2004-2006 after additional adjustment for chemotherapy [final multivariable model, HR2004-2006_vs._2010-2012: 1.1 (95%CI 1.0-1.2)]. Besides, prognostic factors were having chemotherapy [final multivariable model: HR 0.4 (95%CI 0.4-0.4)], female sex [HRmale_vs._female: 1.1 (95%CI 1.0-1.1)], socioeconomic status [HRintermediate_and_high_vs._low both 0.9 (95%CI 0.9-1.0)], comorbidity [HRunknown_vs._2: 1.3 (95%CI 1.2-1.5)], histology [HRother_vs._adenocarcinoma: 1.1 (95%CI 1.1-1.2)], and location of metastasis [range: 1.2 (HRlymph_nodes_vs._brain) - 1.6 (HRliver_vs._brain)]. In conclusion, population-based survival increased due to increasing administration rates of chemotherapy. The administration of chemotherapy was affected by hospital of diagnosis and both patient and tumour characteristics. Identifying patients who benefit from chemotherapy should become a key issue. What's new? The addition of chemotherapy to supportive care can improve survival in patients with metastatic (stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). But certain factors, such as socioeconomic status and patient age, may dictate whether patients with advanced disease use chemotherapy. This population-based study shows that chemotherapy use in stage IV NSCLC is affected by a variety of patient and tumor characteristics. Hospital of diagnosis is also a factor, with significant differences in chemotherapy use observed among hospitals. Increasing administration rates of chemotherapy over the period 2001 to 2012 resulted in an extension of median survival by three weeks.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact on survival of increasing dose-intensity (DI) of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CDE) in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated SCLC patients were randomized to standard CDE (cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks, for five cycles) or intensified CDE (cyclophosphamide 1,250 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 55 mg/m2 on day 1, and etoposide 125 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF] 5 μg/kg/d on days 4 to 13 every 2 weeks, for four cycles). Projected cumulative dose was almost identical on the two arms, whereas projected DI was nearly 90% higher on the intensified arm. Two hundred forty-four patients were enrolled. The first 163 patients were also randomized (2 × 2 factorial design) to prophylactic antibiotics or placebo to assess their impact on preventing febrile leukopenia (FL). This report focuses on chemotherapy DI results. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 54 months, 216 deaths have occurred. Actually delivered DI on the intensified arm was 70% higher than on the standard arm. Intensified CDE was associated with more grade 4 leukopenia (79% v 50%), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (44% v 11%), anorexia, nausea, and mucositis. FL and number of toxic deaths were similar on the two arms. The objective response rate was 79% for the standard arm and 84% for the intensified arm (P = .315). Median survival was 54 weeks and 52 weeks, and the 2-year survival rates were 15% and 18%, respectively (P = .885). CONCLUSION: A 70% increase of CDE actual DI does not translate into an improved outcome in SCLC patients.

Item does not contain fulltext

Purpose: To define the optimal dose of recombinant human interleukin-3 (rhIL-3) required to intensify the dose of carboplatin and cyclophosphamide for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients and Methods: Seventeen patients were treated on day 1 with carboplatin (dose adjusted for creatinine clearance: range, 257 to 385 mg/m(2); median, 300 mg/m(2)) and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m(2)). rhIL-35 mu g/kg/d (n = 10) or 10 mu g/kg/d (n = 7) was administered subcutaneously (SC) on days 2 through 11. Carboplatin dose was escalated if no postponement of cycles 1 to 3 herd occurred. Results: A 3-week interval was achieved in 62% of cycles and a 4-week interval in 81%, with no difference between the rhIL-3 doses. A neutrophil nadir less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L occurred in 35% of the cycles at 5 mu g/kg/d and in 52% at 10 mu g/kg/d of rhIL-3 (nonsignificant difference). The mean platelet nadir in cycle 1 was 173 +/- 78 x 10(9)/L at 5 mu g/kg/d and 340 +/- 152 x 10(9)/L at 10 mu g/kg/d of rhIL-3 (P

We monitored long-term (median 11 months) concentrations of platelet serotonin and urinary serotonin, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, and seven catecholamine metabolites in 44 patients with carcinoid tumors. Tumor serotonin and catecholamine contents (11 patients) and urinary histamine and N-methylhistamine (15 patients) were determined. Consistently increased concentrations of indoles, notably platelet serotonin, were observed in 96%, 43%, and 0% of patients with mid-, fore-, and hindgut carcinoids, respectively. Urinary dopamine metabolites, notably 3-methoxytyramine, were consistently increased in 38%, 20%, and 7% of patients with mid-, hind-, and foregut carcinoids, respectively. For urinary norepinephrine/epinephrine metabolites, notably normetanephrine and metanephrine, these data were 33%, 20%, and 14%, respectively. Midgut carcinoid tumors had the highest serotonin contents, whereas concentrations of catecholamines were independent of primary localization. There was no consistent relation between biogenic amine contents in tumors and urinary excretion of the amine metabolites. Occurrence of carcinoid syndrome was related to increased serotonin production rate. Increased histamine production is not an important feature in patients with lung carcinoids or liver-metastasized ileum carcinoids.

Twenty chemotherapy-naive patients with ovarian carcinoma received 1, 5, 10, or 15 mug/day (rive patients per dose step) of recombinant human interleukin 3 (rhIL-3) over 7 days after carboplatin/cyclophosphamide in Cycles 1 and 3. Patients received rhIL-3 by continuous i.v. infusion or once daily s.c. injection in Cycle 1 and the alternate route in Cycle 3. Plasma rhIL-3 samples were obtained once daily on Days 1 to 6 and serially over a 24-h per-iod on Day 7 for pharmacokinetic assessment of s.c. and i.v. administered rhIL-3 in 16 and 17 patients, respectively. Concentrations were assayed by a time-resolved fluorescence sandwich immunoassay. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived by noncompartmental methods. Mean steady-state concentrations during continuous i.v. infusion ranged from 117 pg/ml (1 mug/kg/day) to 2217 pg/ml (15 mug/kg/day) and were linearly related to dose (r = 0.87, P

Malignant carcinoid tumours, islet cell tumours and medullary carcinomas of the thyroid are tumours with similar clinical features. In patients with unresectable or metastatic tumours leukocyte interferon (IFN) and recombinant human (rh) IFN have demonstrated efficacy. Twenty-four evaluable patients with progressive tumours were treated with 2.5 megaunits rh IFN (alpha-2b, administered once daily subcutaneously, for a median duration of 7 months (range 0.5-37+). Two carcinoid patients demonstrated a response in tumour size, 80% showed stable disease (SD). Sixty percent of the carcinoid patients with elevated urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic (5-HIAA) levels reached a biochemical partial response of the urinary 5-HIAA levels (median duration 13.5 months). In the patients with an islet cell or medullary tumour and an elevated tumour marker, the marker did not further increase. Of the 12 carcinoid patients evaluable for a symptomatic response, ten (83%) experienced a relieve of symptoms. IFN alpha-2b dose reduction or discontinuation due to toxicity was necessary in three and ten patients, respectively. No neutralising IFN alpha-2b antibodies developed despite prolonged treatment. In conclusion, IFN alpha-2b had a beneficial effect in patients with progressive tumours, while long-term IFN alpha-2b treatment did not augment neutralising antibodies. In view of the IFN alpha-2b-related toxicity, administration of IFN alpha-2b on alternating days may be preferable.