Search

Your search keyword '"Bickersteth S"' showing total 9 results
Start Over Author "Bickersteth S"
9 results on '"Bickersteth S"'

1. Guidelines for Modeling and Reporting Health Effects of Climate Change Mitigation Actions

Author

Hess, JJ, Ranadive, N, Boyer, C, Aleksandrowicz, L, Anenberg, SC, Aunan, K, Belesova, K, Bell, ML, Bickersteth, S, Bowen, K, Burden, M, Campbell-Lendrum, D, Carlton, E, Cisse, G, Cohen, F, Dai, H, Dangour, AD, Dasgupta, P, Frumkin, H, Gong, P, Gould, RJ, Haines, A, Hales, S, Hamilton, I, Hasegawa, T, Hashizume, M, Honda, Y, Horton, DE, Karambelas, A, Kim, H, Kim, SE, Kinney, PL, Kone, I, Knowlton, K, Lelieveld, J, Limaye, VS, Liu, Q, Madaniyazi, L, Martinez, ME, Mauzerall, DL, Milner, J, Neville, T, Nieuwenhuijsen, M, Pachauri, S, Perera, F, Pineo, H, Remais, JV, Saari, RK, Sampedro, J, Scheelbeek, P, Schwartz, J, Shindell, D, Shyamsundar, P, Taylor, TJ, Tonne, C, Van Vuuren, D, Wang, C, Watts, N, West, JJ, Wilkinson, P, Wood, SA, Woodcock, J, Woodward, A, Xie, Y, Zhang, Y, Ebi, KL, Hess, JJ, Ranadive, N, Boyer, C, Aleksandrowicz, L, Anenberg, SC, Aunan, K, Belesova, K, Bell, ML, Bickersteth, S, Bowen, K, Burden, M, Campbell-Lendrum, D, Carlton, E, Cisse, G, Cohen, F, Dai, H, Dangour, AD, Dasgupta, P, Frumkin, H, Gong, P, Gould, RJ, Haines, A, Hales, S, Hamilton, I, Hasegawa, T, Hashizume, M, Honda, Y, Horton, DE, Karambelas, A, Kim, H, Kim, SE, Kinney, PL, Kone, I, Knowlton, K, Lelieveld, J, Limaye, VS, Liu, Q, Madaniyazi, L, Martinez, ME, Mauzerall, DL, Milner, J, Neville, T, Nieuwenhuijsen, M, Pachauri, S, Perera, F, Pineo, H, Remais, JV, Saari, RK, Sampedro, J, Scheelbeek, P, Schwartz, J, Shindell, D, Shyamsundar, P, Taylor, TJ, Tonne, C, Van Vuuren, D, Wang, C, Watts, N, West, JJ, Wilkinson, P, Wood, SA, Woodcock, J, Woodward, A, Xie, Y, Zhang, Y, and Ebi, KL

Abstract

Modeling suggests that climate change mitigation actions can have substantial human health benefits that accrue quickly and locally. Documenting the benefits can help drive more ambitious and health-protective climate change mitigation actions; however, documenting the adverse health effects can help to avoid them. Estimating the health effects of mitigation (HEM) actions can help policy makers prioritize investments based not only on mitigation potential but also on expected health benefits. To date, however, the wide range of incompatible approaches taken to developing and reporting HEM estimates has limited their comparability and usefulness to policymakers.

Published
2020

2. Guidelines for modeling and reporting health effects of climate change mitigation actions

Author

Hess, J. J., Ranadive, N., Boyer, C., Aleksandrowicz, L., Anenberg, S. C., Aunan, K., Belesova, K., Bell, M. L., Bickersteth, S., Bowen, K., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Burden, M., Carlton, E., Cissé, G., Cohen, F., Dai, H., Dangour, A. D., Dasgupta, P., Frumkin, H., Gong, P., Gould, R. J., Haines, A., Hales, S., Hamilton, I., Hasegawa, T., Hashizume, M., Honda, Y., Horton, D. E., Karambelas, A., Kim, H., Kim, S. E., Kinney, P. L., Knowlton, K., Kone, I., Lelieveld, J., Limaye, V. S., Madaniyazi, L., Liu, Q., Mauzerall, D. L., Martínez, M. E., Milner, J., Neville, T., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Pachauri, S., Perera, F., Pineo, H., Remais, J. V., Saari, R. K., Scheelbeek, P., Sampedro, J., Schwartz, J., Shindell, D., Shyamsundar, P., Taylor, T. J., Tonne, C., Van Vuuren, D., Wang, D., Watts, N., West, J. J., Wilkinson, P., Woodcock, J, Wood, S. A., Woodward, A., Xie, Y., Zhang, Y., Ebi, K. L., Hess, J. J., Ranadive, N., Boyer, C., Aleksandrowicz, L., Anenberg, S. C., Aunan, K., Belesova, K., Bell, M. L., Bickersteth, S., Bowen, K., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Burden, M., Carlton, E., Cissé, G., Cohen, F., Dai, H., Dangour, A. D., Dasgupta, P., Frumkin, H., Gong, P., Gould, R. J., Haines, A., Hales, S., Hamilton, I., Hasegawa, T., Hashizume, M., Honda, Y., Horton, D. E., Karambelas, A., Kim, H., Kim, S. E., Kinney, P. L., Knowlton, K., Kone, I., Lelieveld, J., Limaye, V. S., Madaniyazi, L., Liu, Q., Mauzerall, D. L., Martínez, M. E., Milner, J., Neville, T., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Pachauri, S., Perera, F., Pineo, H., Remais, J. V., Saari, R. K., Scheelbeek, P., Sampedro, J., Schwartz, J., Shindell, D., Shyamsundar, P., Taylor, T. J., Tonne, C., Van Vuuren, D., Wang, D., Watts, N., West, J. J., Wilkinson, P., Woodcock, J, Wood, S. A., Woodward, A., Xie, Y., Zhang, Y., and Ebi, K. L.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modeling suggests that climate change mitigation actions can have substantial human health benefits that accrue quickly and locally. Documenting the benefits can help drive more ambitious and health-protective climate change mitigation actions; however, documenting the adverse health effects can help to avoid them. Estimating the health effects of mitigation (HEM) actions can help policy makers prioritize investments based not only on mitigation potential but also on expected health benefits. To date, however, the wide range of incompatible approaches taken to developing and reporting HEM estimates has limited their comparability and usefulness to policymakers. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this effort was to generate guidance for modeling studies on scoping, estimating, and reporting population health effects from climate change mitigation actions. METHODS: An expert panel of HEM researchers was recruited to participate in developing guidance for conducting HEM studies. The primary literature and a synthesis of HEM studies were provided to the panel. Panel members then participated in a modified Delphi exercise to identify areas of consensus regarding HEM estimation. Finally, the panel met to review and discuss consensus findings, resolve remaining differences, and generate guidance regarding conducting HEM studies. RESULTS: The panel generated a checklist of recommendations regarding stakeholder engagement: HEM modeling, including model structure, scope and scale, demographics, time horizons, counterfactuals, health response functions, and metrics; parameterization and reporting; approaches to uncertainty and sensitivity analysis; accounting for policy uptake; and discounting. DISCUSSION: This checklist provides guidance for conducting and reporting HEM estimates to make them more comparable and useful for policymakers. Harmonization of HEM estimates has the potential to lead to advances in and improved synthesis of policy-relevant research that can info

Published
2020

3. Guidelines for Modeling and Reporting Health Effects of Climate Change Mitigation Actions

Author

Hess, J.J., Ranadive, N., Boyer, C., Aleksandrowicz, L., Anenberg, S.C., Aunan, K., Belesova, K., Bell, M.L., Bickersteth, S., Bowen, K., Burden, M., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Carlton, E., Cissé, G., Cohen, F., Dai, H., Dangour, A.D., Dasgupta, P., Frumkin, H., Gong, P., Gould, R.J., Haines, A., Hales, S., Hamilton, I., Hasegawa, T., Hashizume, M., Honda, Y., Horton, D.E., Karambelas, A., Kim, H., Kim, S.E., Kinney, P.L., Kone, I., Knowlton, K., Lelieveld, J., Limaye, V.S., Liu, Q., Madaniyazi, L., Martinez, M.E., Mauzerall, D.L., Milner, J., Neville, T., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Pachauri, S., Perera, F., Pineo, H., Remais, J.V., Saari, R.K., Sampedro, J., Scheelbeek, P., Schwartz, J., Shindell, D., Shyamsundar, P., Taylor, T.J., Tonne, C., Van Vuuren, D., Wang, C., Watts, N., West, J.J., Wilkinson, P., Wood, S.A., Woodcock, J., Woodward, A., Xie, Y., Zhang, Y., Ebi, K.L., Hess, J.J., Ranadive, N., Boyer, C., Aleksandrowicz, L., Anenberg, S.C., Aunan, K., Belesova, K., Bell, M.L., Bickersteth, S., Bowen, K., Burden, M., Campbell-Lendrum, D., Carlton, E., Cissé, G., Cohen, F., Dai, H., Dangour, A.D., Dasgupta, P., Frumkin, H., Gong, P., Gould, R.J., Haines, A., Hales, S., Hamilton, I., Hasegawa, T., Hashizume, M., Honda, Y., Horton, D.E., Karambelas, A., Kim, H., Kim, S.E., Kinney, P.L., Kone, I., Knowlton, K., Lelieveld, J., Limaye, V.S., Liu, Q., Madaniyazi, L., Martinez, M.E., Mauzerall, D.L., Milner, J., Neville, T., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Pachauri, S., Perera, F., Pineo, H., Remais, J.V., Saari, R.K., Sampedro, J., Scheelbeek, P., Schwartz, J., Shindell, D., Shyamsundar, P., Taylor, T.J., Tonne, C., Van Vuuren, D., Wang, C., Watts, N., West, J.J., Wilkinson, P., Wood, S.A., Woodcock, J., Woodward, A., Xie, Y., Zhang, Y., and Ebi, K.L.

Abstract

Background: Modeling suggests that climate change mitigation actions can have substantial human health benefits that accrue quickly and locally. Documenting the benefits can help drive more ambitious and health-protective climate change mitigation actions; however, documenting the adverse health effects can help to avoid them. Estimating the health effects of mitigation (HEM) actions can help policy makers prioritize investments based not only on mitigation potential but also on expected health benefits. To date, however, the wide range of incompatible approaches taken to developing and reporting HEM estimates has limited their comparability and usefulness to policymakers. Objective: The objective of this effort was to generate guidance for modeling studies on scoping, estimating, and reporting population health effects from climate change mitigation actions. Methods: An expert panel of HEM researchers was recruited to participate in developing guidance for conducting HEM studies. The primary literature and a synthesis of HEM studies were provided to the panel. Panel members then participated in a modified Delphi exercise to identify areas of consensus regarding HEM estimation. Finally, the panel met to review and discuss consensus findings, resolve remaining differences, and generate guidance regarding conducting HEM studies. Results: The panel generated a checklist of recommendations regarding stakeholder engagement: HEM modeling, including model structure, scope and scale, demographics, time horizons, counterfactuals, health response functions, and metrics; parameterization and reporting; approaches to uncertainty and sensitivity analysis; accounting for policy uptake; and discounting. Discussion: This checklist provides guidance for conducting and reporting HEM estimates to make them more comparable and useful for policymakers. Harmonization of HEM estimates has the potential to lead to advances in and improved synthesis of policy-relevant research that can info

Published
2020

4. The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture

Author

Pretty, Jules N., Sutherland, W.J., Ashby, J.A., Auburn, J., Baulcombe, D.C., Bell, M., Bentley, J.W., Bickersteth, S., Brown, K., Burke, J., Campbell, H., Chen, K., Crowley, E.L., Crute, I., Dobbelaere, D.A.E., Edwards-Jones, G., Funes-Monzote, F., Godfray, H.Charles J., Griffon, M., Gypmantisiri, P., Haddad, L., Halavatau, S., Herren, H., Holderness, M., Izac, A.M., Jones, M., Koohafkan, P., Lal, R., Lang, T., McNeely, J., Mueller, A., Nisbett, N., Noble, A.D., Pingali, Prabhu L., Pinto, Y., Rabbinge, Rudy, Ravindranath, N.H., Rola, A., Roling, N., Sage, C., Settle, W., Sha, J.M., Shiming, L., Simons, T., Smith, Pete, Strzepek, K.M., Swaine, H., Terry, Eugene R., Tomich, Thomas P., Toulmin, C., Trigo, Eduardo, Twomlow, Stephen, Vis, J.K., Wilson, J., Pilgrim, S., Pretty, Jules N., Sutherland, W.J., Ashby, J.A., Auburn, J., Baulcombe, D.C., Bell, M., Bentley, J.W., Bickersteth, S., Brown, K., Burke, J., Campbell, H., Chen, K., Crowley, E.L., Crute, I., Dobbelaere, D.A.E., Edwards-Jones, G., Funes-Monzote, F., Godfray, H.Charles J., Griffon, M., Gypmantisiri, P., Haddad, L., Halavatau, S., Herren, H., Holderness, M., Izac, A.M., Jones, M., Koohafkan, P., Lal, R., Lang, T., McNeely, J., Mueller, A., Nisbett, N., Noble, A.D., Pingali, Prabhu L., Pinto, Y., Rabbinge, Rudy, Ravindranath, N.H., Rola, A., Roling, N., Sage, C., Settle, W., Sha, J.M., Shiming, L., Simons, T., Smith, Pete, Strzepek, K.M., Swaine, H., Terry, Eugene R., Tomich, Thomas P., Toulmin, C., Trigo, Eduardo, Twomlow, Stephen, Vis, J.K., Wilson, J., and Pilgrim, S.

5. The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture

Author

Pretty, Jules N., Sutherland, W.J., Ashby, J.A., Auburn, J., Baulcombe, D.C., Bell, M., Bentley, J.W., Bickersteth, S., Brown, K., Burke, J., Campbell, H., Chen, K., Crowley, E.L., Crute, I., Dobbelaere, D.A.E., Edwards-Jones, G., Funes-Monzote, F., Godfray, H.Charles J., Griffon, M., Gypmantisiri, P., Haddad, L., Halavatau, S., Herren, H., Holderness, M., Izac, A.M.N., Jones, M., Koohafkan, P., Lal, R., Lang, T., McNeely, J., Mueller, A., Nisbett, N., Noble, A.D., Pingali, Prabhu L., Pinto, Y., Rabbinge, Rudy, Ravindranath, N.H., Rola, A., Roling, N., Sage, C., Settle, W., Sha, J.M., Shiming, L., Simons, T., Smith, Pete, Strzepek, K.M., Swaine, H., Terry, Eugene R., Tomich, Thomas P., Toulmin, C., Trigo, Eduardo, Twomlow, Stephen, Vis, J.K., Wilson, J., Pilgrim, S., Pretty, Jules N., Sutherland, W.J., Ashby, J.A., Auburn, J., Baulcombe, D.C., Bell, M., Bentley, J.W., Bickersteth, S., Brown, K., Burke, J., Campbell, H., Chen, K., Crowley, E.L., Crute, I., Dobbelaere, D.A.E., Edwards-Jones, G., Funes-Monzote, F., Godfray, H.Charles J., Griffon, M., Gypmantisiri, P., Haddad, L., Halavatau, S., Herren, H., Holderness, M., Izac, A.M.N., Jones, M., Koohafkan, P., Lal, R., Lang, T., McNeely, J., Mueller, A., Nisbett, N., Noble, A.D., Pingali, Prabhu L., Pinto, Y., Rabbinge, Rudy, Ravindranath, N.H., Rola, A., Roling, N., Sage, C., Settle, W., Sha, J.M., Shiming, L., Simons, T., Smith, Pete, Strzepek, K.M., Swaine, H., Terry, Eugene R., Tomich, Thomas P., Toulmin, C., Trigo, Eduardo, Twomlow, Stephen, Vis, J.K., Wilson, J., and Pilgrim, S.

6. Guidelines for Modeling and Reporting Health Effects of Climate Change Mitigation Actions.

Author

Hess JJ, Ranadive N, Boyer C, Aleksandrowicz L, Anenberg SC, Aunan K, Belesova K, Bell ML, Bickersteth S, Bowen K, Burden M, Campbell-Lendrum D, Carlton E, Cissé G, Cohen F, Dai H, Dangour AD, Dasgupta P, Frumkin H, Gong P, Gould RJ, Haines A, Hales S, Hamilton I, Hasegawa T, Hashizume M, Honda Y, Horton DE, Karambelas A, Kim H, Kim SE, Kinney PL, Kone I, Knowlton K, Lelieveld J, Limaye VS, Liu Q, Madaniyazi L, Martinez ME, Mauzerall DL, Milner J, Neville T, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Pachauri S, Perera F, Pineo H, Remais JV, Saari RK, Sampedro J, Scheelbeek P, Schwartz J, Shindell D, Shyamsundar P, Taylor TJ, Tonne C, Van Vuuren D, Wang C, Watts N, West JJ, Wilkinson P, Wood SA, Woodcock J, Woodward A, Xie Y, Zhang Y, and Ebi KL

Subjects
Climate Change, Disease Outbreaks, Epidemiologic Studies, Humans, SARS-CoV-2, Air Pollution, COVID-19, Coronavirus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Abstract

Background: Modeling suggests that climate change mitigation actions can have substantial human health benefits that accrue quickly and locally. Documenting the benefits can help drive more ambitious and health-protective climate change mitigation actions; however, documenting the adverse health effects can help to avoid them. Estimating the health effects of mitigation (HEM) actions can help policy makers prioritize investments based not only on mitigation potential but also on expected health benefits. To date, however, the wide range of incompatible approaches taken to developing and reporting HEM estimates has limited their comparability and usefulness to policymakers., Objective: The objective of this effort was to generate guidance for modeling studies on scoping, estimating, and reporting population health effects from climate change mitigation actions., Methods: An expert panel of HEM researchers was recruited to participate in developing guidance for conducting HEM studies. The primary literature and a synthesis of HEM studies were provided to the panel. Panel members then participated in a modified Delphi exercise to identify areas of consensus regarding HEM estimation. Finally, the panel met to review and discuss consensus findings, resolve remaining differences, and generate guidance regarding conducting HEM studies., Results: The panel generated a checklist of recommendations regarding stakeholder engagement: HEM modeling, including model structure, scope and scale, demographics, time horizons, counterfactuals, health response functions, and metrics; parameterization and reporting; approaches to uncertainty and sensitivity analysis; accounting for policy uptake; and discounting., Discussion: This checklist provides guidance for conducting and reporting HEM estimates to make them more comparable and useful for policymakers. Harmonization of HEM estimates has the potential to lead to advances in and improved synthesis of policy-relevant research that can inform evidence-based decision making and practice. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6745.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. Food systems for sustainable development: proposals for a profound four-part transformation.

Author

Caron P, Ferrero Y de Loma-Osorio G, Nabarro D, Hainzelin E, Guillou M, Andersen I, Arnold T, Astralaga M, Beukeboom M, Bickersteth S, Bwalya M, Caballero P, Campbell BM, Divine N, Fan S, Frick M, Friis A, Gallagher M, Halkin JP, Hanson C, Lasbennes F, Ribera T, Rockstrom J, Schuepbach M, Steer A, Tutwiler A, and Verburg G

Abstract

Evidence shows the importance of food systems for sustainable development: they are at the nexus that links food security, nutrition, and human health, the viability of ecosystems, climate change, and social justice. However, agricultural policies tend to focus on food supply, and sometimes, on mechanisms to address negative externalities. We propose an alternative. Our starting point is that agriculture and food systems' policies should be aligned to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. This calls for deep changes in comparison with the paradigms that prevailed when steering the agricultural change in the XXth century. We identify the comprehensive food systems transformation that is needed. It has four parts: first, food systems should enable all people to benefit from nutritious and healthy food. Second, they should reflect sustainable agricultural production and food value chains. Third, they should mitigate climate change and build resilience. Fourth, they should encourage a renaissance of rural territories. The implementation of the transformation relies on (i) suitable metrics to aid decision-making, (ii) synergy of policies through convergence of local and global priorities, and (iii) enhancement of development approaches that focus on territories. We build on the work of the "Milano Group," an informal group of experts convened by the UN Secretary General in Milan in 2015. Backed by a literature review, what emerges is a strategic narrative linking climate, agriculture and food, and calling for a deep transformation of food systems at scale. This is critical for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement. The narrative highlights the needed consistency between global actions for sustainable development and numerous local-level innovations. It emphasizes the challenge of designing differentiated paths for food systems transformation responding to local and national expectations. Scientific and operational challenges are associated with the alignment and arbitration of local action within the context of global priorities.

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results