Search

Introduction/Purpose: Nusinersen, the first treatment approved for all spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) types, is administered intrathecally through lumbar puncture. We used ultrasound assistance or a landmark‐based technique to access the lumbar intrathecal space in adult SMA patients. This study aimed to evaluate the technical success and adverse events (AEs) in such patients using either technique over a long observation period. Methods: Fifty‐one adult patients received 507 consecutive interlaminar nusinersen administrations. Patients presented with both 'uncomplicated spines' or 'complicated spines'; two patients had previous back surgery. Technical success and AEs were recorded using either technique. A generalised linear mixed model was applied to evaluate predictors of technical success and complications. Results: An overall success rate of 99.6%, with only two procedures failing to reach the intrathecal space, and an overall optimal procedure rate of 90.3% have been reported. A total of 455 procedures (89.7%) were uneventfully performed. One (0.2%) case of severe AE (puncture of a bulky abdominal annexal cyst) was recorded. Twenty‐seven episodes (5.3%) of post‐dural puncture headache (PDPH) and 24 episodes (4.7%) of radicular or back pain, both successfully treated with medical therapy, have also been reported. Technical success was significantly associated with 'complicated spines' (P = 0.022) and the use of ultrasound assistance (P = 0.01), and the use of ultrasound was the only independent predictor of uncomplicated procedures (P = 0.007). Discussion: In adult patients with SMA both landmark‐based and ultrasound‐assisted techniques are safe and effective even in the long term. The use of assistance is associated with technical success and can predict uncomplicated procedures. Conclusion: Our results support the use of ultrasonography in order to improve the success and reduce the burden of nusinersen intrathecal administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/Aims: Nusinersen intrathecal administration can be challenging in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) adults. We aimed to determine if the ultrasound (US)‐assistance reduces the number of needle attempts and needle redirections needed for intrathecal drug administration and its impact on the procedure time, the incidence of adverse events (AEs), and patient satisfaction in these patients. Methods: Fifty‐eight patients aged 18 years and older scheduled for intrathecal nusinersen injection were enrolled and randomized (1:1 ratio) into Group 1 (nusinersen infusion with US‐assisted technique) or Group 2 (nusinersen infusion with landmark‐based technique). The number of attempts, number of redirections, periprocedural time, AEs and patient satisfaction were reported. Continuous variables were compared with the Student t‐test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Categorical variables were evaluated with the Chi‐square test or Fisher's exact test in case of expected frequencies <5. The p‐values <.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: There were no statistical differences in the number of attempts, AEs, or patient satisfaction between the two groups. The number of needle redirections was significantly lower in the ultrasound group versus landmark‐based group (p <.05) in both the overall group of patients and in the subgroup with difficult spines. The periprocedural time was about 40 seconds longer in US‐group versus landmark‐based group (p <.05). Discussion: In SMA adults, US assistance reduces the number of needle redirections needed for intrathecal drug administration. These results suggest that the US assistance may be advantageous for nusinersen therapy to reduce the therapeutic burden of intrathecal infusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ESP block (ESPB) and posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block (pQLB) have been proposed as opioid-sparing techniques for the management of pain after abdominal surgery. Between December 2021 and October 2022, we conducted a retrospective comparative study at the delivery suite of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, to compare the efficacy of ESPB and pQLB in preventing postoperative pain after an elective caesarean section (CS). The primary outcome was total morphine consumption in the first 24 h. Secondary outcomes were time to first opioid request; Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at 0, 2, 6, 12 and 24 h; vital signs; adverse events. Fifty-two women were included. The total cumulative dose of morphine was not significantly different between the two groups of patients (p = 0.897). Time to first dose of morphine, NPRS values and haemodynamic parameters were not statistically different between the two groups. NPRS values significantly increased (p < 0.001) at the different time intervals considered. The need for rescue doses of morphine was lower in the ESPB group compared to the pQLB group (hazard ratio of 0.51, 95% CI (0.27 to 0.95), p = 0.030). No adverse event was reported. ESPB seems to be as effective as pQLB in providing analgesia after CS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]