Search

This paper contains a joint ESHG/ASHG position document with recommendations regarding responsible innovation in prenatal screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). By virtue of its greater accuracy and safety with respect to prenatal screening for common autosomal aneuploidies, NIPT has the potential of helping the practice better achieve its aim of facilitating autonomous reproductive choices, provided that balanced pretest information and non-directive counseling are available as part of the screening offer. Depending on the health-care setting, different scenarios for NIPT-based screening for common autosomal aneuploidies are possible. The trade-offs involved in these scenarios should be assessed in light of the aim of screening, the balance of benefits and burdens for pregnant women and their partners and considerations of cost-effectiveness and justice. With improving screening technologies and decreasing costs of sequencing and analysis, it will become possible in the near future to significantly expand the scope of prenatal screening beyond common autosomal aneuploidies. Commercial providers have already begun expanding their tests to include sex-chromosomal abnormalities and microdeletions. However, multiple false positives may undermine the main achievement of NIPT in the context of prenatal screening: the significant reduction of the invasive testing rate. This document argues for a cautious expansion of the scope of prenatal screening to serious congenital and childhood disorders, only following sound validation studies and a comprehensive evaluation of all relevant aspects. A further core message of this document is that in countries where prenatal screening is offered as a public health programme, governments and public health authorities should adopt an active role to ensure the responsible innovation of prenatal screening on the basis of ethical principles. Crucial elements are the quality of the screening process as a whole (including non-laboratory aspects such as information and counseling), education of professionals, systematic evaluation of all aspects of prenatal screening, development of better evaluation tools in the light of the aim of the practice, accountability to all stakeholders including children born from screened pregnancies and persons living with the conditions targeted in prenatal screening and promotion of equity of access.European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication, 18 March 2015; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.57. ispartof: European Journal of Human Genetics vol:23 issue:11 pages:1438-50 ispartof: location:England status: published

Item does not contain fulltext In its successful annual cycle of controversies and debates, the International Society of Prenatal Diagnosis and Therapy once again addressed non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by following up on the 2013 controversy, 'Should non-invasive DNA testing be the standard screening test for Down syndrome in all pregnant women'? with the proposition, 'NIPT for chromosomel abnormalities should be offered to women with low a priori risk'.

Objective: To determine placental pathology and immune response at the maternal-fetal interface in pregnancies conceived by IVF via egg donation compared with nondonor IVF pregnancies. Design: Retrospective case-control study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(S): The study population included 20 egg donor and 33 nondonor IVF pregnancies of >24 weeks' gestation. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Perinatal complications (gestational hypertension, abruption, preterm delivery, cesarean section), microscopic features indicating ail immune response and trophoblast damage, and characterization of inflammatory cells using immunohistochemistry. Result(S): There was ail increase in gestational hypertension and preterm delivery in egg donor pregnancies. Dense fibrinoid deposition in the basal plate with severe chronic deciduitis containing significantly increased numbers of T helper and natural killer cells were demonstrated in egg donor placentas. Trophoblast damage was also increased in the preterm egg donor group. Conclusion(S): There are significant histological and immunohistochemical differences between the placentas of egg donor and nondonor IVF pregnancies. The increased immune activity and fibrinoid deposition at the maternal-fetal interface of egg donor pregnancies Could represent a host versus graft rejection-like phenomenon. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010;93:397-404. (C)2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

The International Placenta Stem Cell Society (IPLASS) was founded in June 2010. Its goal is to serve as a network for advancing research and clinical applications of stem/progenitor cells isolated from human term placental tissues, including the amnio-chorionic fetal membranes and Wharton’s jelly. The commitment of the Society to champion placenta as a stem cell source was realized with the inaugural meeting of IPLASS held in Brescia, Italy, in October 2010. Officially designated as an EMBO-endorsed scientific activity, international experts in the field gathered for a 3-day meeting, which commenced with “Meet with the experts” sessions, IPLASS member and board meetings, and welcome remarks by Dr. Ornella Parolini, President of IPLASS. The evening’s highlight was a keynote plenary lecture by Dr. Diana Bianchi. The subsequent scientific program consisted of morning and afternoon oral and poster presentations, followed by social events. Both provided many opportunities for intellectual exchange among the 120 multi-national participants. This allowed a methodical and deliberate evaluation of the status of placental cells in research in regenerative and reparative medicine. The meeting concluded with Dr. Parolini summarizing the meeting’s highlights. This further prepared the fertile ground on which to build the promising potential of placental cell research. The second IPLASS meeting will take place in September 2012 in Vienna, Austria. This meeting report summarizes the thought-provoking lectures delivered at the first meeting of IPLASS.