Search

Jian Zhu,1,* Guang-Ping Zhu,2,* Yan-Ming Weng,3,* Yong Zhang,4 Bi-Xi Li5 1Department of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the People’s Liberation Army, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Endocrinology, General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the People’s Liberation Army, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Stomatology, General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the People’s Liberation Army, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Integrative Medicine, General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the People’s Liberation Army, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the People’s Liberation Army, Wuhan, Hubei Province, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Yong Zhang; Bi-Xi Li, Tel +86-13986107360 ; +86-13397192089, Email zbzqzyyzy@163.com; Bxlee@sohu.comBackground: The Fangcang shelter hospital has gradually become the primary management mode in China’s fight against this Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in 2020. In early 2022, the Fangcang shelter hospital management model was successfully applied to the new outbreak of COVID-19 in Shanghai also. Although Fangcang shelter hospitals are no longer the prevailing mode of prevention of COVID-19, the management experience of Shanghai makeshift hospitals is worthy of reference for public health.Methods: The authors conducted a descriptive statistical analysis of Hall 6-2 of the Shanghai National Convention and Exhibition Center Fangcang shelter hospital. The whole hall of the Fangcang shelter hospital was managed by the one hospital, and the inclusion of third-party management personnel alleviated the shortage of medical personnel human resources. Through practice, a new procedure for treating batch infected people was introduced.Results: By optimizing ward management, 72 on-duty doctors, 360 on-duty nurses, 3 sense-control administrators, and 15 administrators cured 18,574 infected people in 40 days, and created a record of a doctor managing 700 infected people without compromising the quality of treatment. There have been no deaths and no complaints from the infected people located in Hall 6-2 of the Shanghai National Convention and Exhibition Center Fangcang shelter hospital.Conclusion: Compared with previous data, the new management mode of Fangcang shelter hospitals provides a reference for the management of the new infectious diseases for public health.Keywords: COVID-19, Omicron variant, Fangcang shelter hospital, management, Shanghai’s experience

Na Lei,1,&ast; Bi-Xi Li,2,&ast; Kai-Fen Zhang,3 Hui Bao,4 Jian Ding,1 Yan Wang1 1Department of Disinfection and Supply, General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the People’s Liberation Army, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Anesthesiology, General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the People’s Liberation Army, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Outpatient, General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the People’s Liberation Army, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Urology, General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the People’s Liberation Army, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Jian Ding; Yan Wang, Department of Disinfection and Supply, General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the People’s Liberation Army, 627&num;, Wuluo Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430070, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-18971123442, Fax +86-27-50772953, Email zbzqzyydj1995@163.com; whwangy1963@126.comObjective: To analyze the impact of the new supervision and management methods of infection controllers on the protection of third-party personnel entering and leaving Shanghai Fangcang shelter hospital, to provide a reference for the management of third-party personnel in Fangcang shelter hospitals.Methods: A total of 200 third-party personnel received with traditional supervision and management methods, and 156 received new supervision and management methods from the Fangcang shelter hospital of the Shanghai International Convention and Exhibition Center. The sociodemographic characteristics of third-party personnel, including gender, age, education level, work experience in fighting the epidemic with safety awareness, was analyzed. The effects of the two different management modes on the protection of third-party personnel were statistically analyzed by the Chi-square test or logistic regression analysis.Results: There were statistically significant differences in the incidence of infection among third-party personnel in terms of age, education level, work experience in fighting the epidemic in traditional supervision and management group, and whether they accepted the new supervision and management model had statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). The main causes of incorrect put on and take off protective clothing, such as wrong way to detach the face screen, wrong way to remove goggles, wrong way to undress protective clothing, wrong way to take off the shoe cover, hand washing steps omitted, are that causes infection of third-party personnel (p < 0.05).Conclusion: The new supervision and management model can reduce the infection rate of third-party personnel in Fangcang shelter hospitals through planned and purposeful training in terms of different age groups, education levels, work experience, and acceptance of protection knowledge.Keywords: shelter hospital, third-party personnel, new supervision, infection rate, Fangcang hospital

Background: The reviews on the risk factors with ARDS and the worse outcomes concluded lacking robust data of risk factors to prevent COVID-19 and identified an urgent need for large sample and high-quality research in this area, as well as the features of the ARDS.Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 333 COVID-19 inpatients at two hospitals in Hubei of China in 2020. The COVID-19-related ARDS was diagnosed according to the Berlin criteria. The outcomes were ARDS development and the intubation or in-hospital death. The cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) models were employed to determine the significant risk factors. Results: The median number of days from symptom onset to ARDS diagnosis was 11.0 (IQR, 8.0–13.0). Up to 84.1% COVID-19-related ARDS patients demonstrated multiple organ injuries. The mortality rates were 41.9% and 85.7% in moderate and severe ARDS. The survival patients on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) had been intubated earlier since ARDS diagnosis than those who had not survived (5.5 median days, IQR 4.0-7.0 days versus 11.5 median days, IQR 6.0-14.0 days, P < 0.001). Males and all abnormal laboratory indices associated with the higher risk of ARDS (P0.05). The sensitivity analyses found that lymphocyte count of < 1000 per mm3 at hospital admission were still significantly associated with developing ARDS when adjusting for age and male gender (HR, 4.10; 95% CI, 2.40-7.10), and oxygenation index (OI) ratio < 150 were more likely to predict the intubation/death after age adjustment (HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.17-5.30). Conclusion: The SARS-CoV-2-caused ARDS was not the typical ARDS according to Berlin criteria. The alive patients with IMV had been intubated earlier since ARDS diagnosis than those who had not survived. We identified male gender and abnormal laboratory indices associated with the ARDS but were not linked with the intubation/death. Sensitivity analysis concluded lymphocyte count of < 1000 per mm3 could predict ARDS while OI ratio less than 150 could predict intubation/death.

Background: More evidence in understanding the heterogeneity of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and in improving strategy to increase the survival from the critical patients intubated is always needed. The study aimed to comprehensively explore the features of COVID-19-associated ARDS and the features and outcomes between the early and late intubation groups. Methods: This retrospective cohort included 65 adult COVID-19 inpatients with ARDS at two hospitals in Hubei, China. The ARDS in these patients was diagnosed according to the Berlin criteria. We defined intubation within 7 days of ARDS diagnosis as ‘early’ intubation and that performed from the eighth day as ‘late’ intubation based on literatures. The outcomes were invasive mechanical ventilation and in-hospital death. The log-binomial regression models were used to explore the risk factors and the Kaplan-Meier statistic was used to estimate the risk of mortality. Results: The median number of days from symptom onset to ARDS diagnosis was 11.0 (IQR, 8.0–13.0). Up to 84.1% COVID-19-related ARDS patients demonstrated multiple organ injuries. The mortality rates were 41.9% and 85.7% in moderate and severe ARDS. The early intubation and the late intubation had the differences in days from symptom onset/hospital admission/ARDS diagnosis to intubation (P = 0.023, P = 0.011, P < 0.001). Compared with the early-intubation group, the late-intubation group showed less severity at admission (median oxygenation index 159.0 95% CI 134.0-203.0 vs. 133.9 95% CI 98.3-183.2), but required more aggressive therapies (ICU 80% vs. 70%, CRRT 50% vs. 10%, prone-position 50% vs. 30%, and ECMO 50% vs. 10%) and had higher risk to die at hospital (RR, 3.18; 95% CI 1.98-5.12). Conclusion: The ARDS caused by COVID-19 was not typical ARDS due to prolonged onset time, multiple organ injuries, and higher mortalities. The late-intubation group showed less severity at admission but higher risk of in-hospital death than the early-intubation group.

There have been almost no reports on the technique of dynamic volume computed tomography angiography (DVCTA) in children with anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (ALCAPA). Twelve children with ALCAPA, aged 5 months to 15 years, were enrolled in this retrospective study to explore the clinical value of DVCTA in the diagnosis of ALCAPA in children. All patients underwent low-dose prospective ECG-gated 320-slice DVCTA and transthoracic echocardiography. Two radiologists evaluated the image quality of the DVCTA and recorded the radiation dose at the same time. The accuracy of DVCTA in the diagnosis of ALCAPA was 100%, with the left coronary artery (LCA) opening in the left wall of the pulmonary artery in 4 cases (33.3%), the right wall in 2 cases (16.7%), and the posterior wall in 6 cases (50.0%). All children completed 320-slice DVCTA at a single timepoint; all of the images were diagnosable, and the subjective score was 3.3±0.6, with good consistency between the evaluations performed by the two radiologists (k=0.79). From the echocardiographs of these cases, 4 cases (33.3%) of ALCAPA were diagnosed correctly, 4 cases (33.3%) were misdiagnosed as LCA-pulmonary artery fistula, and 4 cases (33.3%) were missed, including a small LCA that was not displayed in 2 cases. The average CT radiation dose was 0.83±0.57 mSv. Low-dose DVCTA clearly showed the origin, course, and collateral vessels of ALCAPA and could be used reliably for noninvasive diagnosis of ALCAPA in children.