Search

© 2022 The Authors. Pediatric Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.Background: Vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) is considered to be a risk factor for recurrent febrile urinary tract infections and impaired renal transplant survival. Methods: An online survey supported by the European Society for Paediatric Nephrology was designed to evaluate current management strategies of VUR in native and transplanted kidneys of recipients aged

Contains fulltext : 290812.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome is the most frequent pediatric glomerular disease, affecting from 1.15 to 16.9 per 100,000 children per year globally. It is characterized by massive proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, and/or concomitant edema. Approximately 85-90% of patients attain complete remission of proteinuria within 4-6 weeks of treatment with glucocorticoids, and therefore, have steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS). Among those patients who are steroid sensitive, 70-80% will have at least one relapse during follow-up, and up to 50% of these patients will experience frequent relapses or become dependent on glucocorticoids to maintain remission. The dose and duration of steroid treatment to prolong time between relapses remains a subject of much debate, and patients continue to experience a high prevalence of steroid-related morbidity. Various steroid-sparing immunosuppressive drugs have been used in clinical practice; however, there is marked practice variation in the selection of these drugs and timing of their introduction during the course of the disease. Therefore, international evidence-based clinical practice recommendations (CPRs) are needed to guide clinical practice and reduce practice variation. The International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA) convened a team of experts including pediatric nephrologists, an adult nephrologist, and a patient representative to develop comprehensive CPRs on the diagnosis and management of SSNS in children. After performing a systematic literature review on 12 clinically relevant PICO (Patient or Population covered, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) questions, recommendations were formulated and formally graded at several virtual consensus meetings. New definitions for treatment outcomes to help guide change of therapy and recommendations for important research questions are given.

PubMedID: 30773598 Background. Primary distal renal tubular acidosis (dRTA) is a rare disorder, and we aimed to gather data on treatment and long-Termoutcome. Methods. We contacted paediatric and adult nephrologists through European professional organizations. Responding clinicians entered demographic, biochemical, genetic and clinical data in an online form. Results. Adequate data were collected on 340 patients (29 countries, female 52%). Mutation testing had been performed on 206 patients (61%); pathogenic mutations were identified in 170 patients (83%). The median (range) presentation age was 0.5 (0-54) years and age at last follow-up was 11.0 (0-70.0) years. Adult height was slightly below average with a mean (SD score) of -0.57 (61.16). There was an increased prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage -2 in children (35%) and adults (82%). Nephrocalcinosis was reported in 88%. Nephrolithiasis was more common with SLC4A1 mutations (42% versus 21%). Thirty-six percent had hearing loss, particularly in ATP6V1B1 (88%). The median (interquartile range) prescribed dose of alkali (mEq/kg/day) was 1.9 (1.2-3.3). Adequate metabolic control (normal plasma bicarbonate and normocalciuria) was achieved in 158 patients (51%), more commonly in countries with higher gross domestic product (67% versus 23%), and was associated with higher height and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Conclusion. Long-Term follow-up from this large dRTA cohort shows an overall favourable outcome with normal adult height for most and no patient with CKD Stage 5. However, 82% of adult patients have CKD Stages 2-4. Importance of adequate metabolic control was highlighted by better growth and renal function but was achieved in only half of patients. © The Author(s) 2018. Erciyes Üniversitesi Iran University of Medical Sciences Università degli Studi di Padova Chung Hua University American Ornithologists' Union University of Queensland 7Centre University College London Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Lunds Universitet Cairo University National Rosacea Society Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 1Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, 2Centre for Nephrology, University College London, London, UK, 3Division of Nephrology, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital—IRCCS, Rome, Italy, 4Pediatric Nephrology—CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France, 5Ali-Asghar Clinical Research Development Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, 6Department of Pediatrics, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland, 7Centre de référence Maladies rénales rares, Bron, France, 8ASST Niguarda, Milan, Italy, 9Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, 10University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 11King Edward Memorial Hospital, Pune, India, 12Department of Pediatrics, Center of Pediatric Nephrology & Transplantation, Kasr Al Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, 13Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, 14Division of Pediatric Nephrology, NRS Medical College, Kolkata, India, 15Pediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera & University of Padova, Padova, Italy, 16University Children’s Hospital, Medical School, Skopje, Macedonia, 17National Medical and Research Centre for Children’s Health, Moscow, Russia, 18Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Service de Nephrologie Pediatrique, Hopital des Enfants, Centre De Reference des Maladies Rénales Rares du Sud Ouest, Toulouse, France, 19Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain, 20Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 21Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Urological Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero—Universitaria Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy, 22Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 23University Children’s Hospital, Münster, Germany, 24Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 25Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal, 26Fourth Pediatric Department, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece, 27Lady Cilento Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia, 28School of Medicine, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 29Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey, 30Nephrology Unit Azienda Ospedaliera, Papa Giovani XXIII, Bergamo, Italy, 31Karolinska Institutet, Lund University,Sweden,GroupFlorenceNightingaleHospitals,Ist32· anbul, Turkey,Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Universita` Cattolica del33 Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy, 34Pediatric Nephrology Center of Excellence and Pediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 35Pediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda—Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy, 36Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy, 37Pediatric Department, Lillebaelt Hospital Kolding, Kolding, Denmark, 38Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Center for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, 39Haseki Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, 40Belarusian State Medical University, Minsk, Belarus, 41Department of Genetics, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France, 42Pediatric Nephrology Unit, AOU Policlinic G Martino, Messina, Italy, 43Necker Hospital, Paris, France, 44Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey, 45Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey, 46Nephrology Centre, Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania, 47University Hospital of Lille, France, 48Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia, 49University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, 50Department of Pediatrics, SMDZ in Zabrze, SUM in Katowice, Poland, 51Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, The European dRTA Consortium consists of the authors, as well as: Amira Peco-Antic(Department of Nephrology, University Children’s Hospital, Belgrade, Serbia), Amrit Kaur (Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital, Manchester, UK), Antonino Paglialunga (ASP de Ragusa, Modica, Italy), Aude Servais (Department of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Necker, APHP, Paris, France), Branko Lutovac (Clinical Centre of Montenegro, Institute for Children’s Disease, Podgorica, Montenegro), Ewout J. Hoorn (Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands), Hadas Shasha-Lavsky (Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel), Jerome Harambat (Pediatric Nephrology Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France), Astrid Godron-Dubrasquet (Pediatric Nephrology Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France), Kathrin Buder (Pediatric Department, University Hospital, Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany), Lise Allard (Department of Pediatrics, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France), Ludwig Patzer (Children’s Hospital St Elisabeth and St Barbara, Halle, Germany), Marina Shumikhina (Filatov Children’s Clinical Hospital No. 13, Moscow, Russia), Matthias Hansen (KfH Centre of Paediatric Nephrology, Clementine Children’s Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany), Nikoleta Printza (First Pediatric Department, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece), Nuran Küc¸ük (Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey), Ortraud Beringer (University Children’s Hospital, Ulm, Germany), Rajendra Bhimma (Inkosi Albert Luthuli, Central Hospital, Durban, South Africa), Rimante Cerkauskiene (Faculty of Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania; Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius University Hospital, Vilnius, Lithuania), Thomas J. Neuhaus (Children’s Hospital of Lucerne, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland), Valbona Stavileci (Pediatric Clinic, Prishtina, Kosovo), Tim Ulinski (Pediatric Nephrology Department, Armand Trousseau University Hospital, APHP, Paris, France), Nida Temizkan Dincel (Health Sciences University, Izmir Dr Behcet Uz Children’s Hospital, İzmir, Turkey) and Nilufar Mohebbi (Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland)

No Abstract

Comparison of quality by depth (QD) from CAKUT and ExAC. Sites that were filtered out of ExAC (VQSR filtering) are shown in red. Sites that were marked as “PASS” in ExAC are shown in gold. Sites that were Not Sanger validated are shown in green. Sites that were Sanger Validated are shown in teal. Sites filtered by tarSVM are shown in blue. Sites that passed tarSVM are shown in purple. Quality by depth is correlated with mean allele balance, as is being used as a proxy for it. It is clear that there is a very clear separation between variants that are filtered by tarSVM and variants that pass tarSVM. Most of the variants filtered by tarSVM have a much lower quality than the pass variants. Variants that are Sanger validated are stronger correlated with variants that pass tarSVM. Variants that are labeled “PASS” in ExAC have a higher variant quality that the microfluidic data. The filtered variants in ExAC have a more flat distribution that those filtered by tarSVM. It is important to note, the variants that underwent Sanger sequencing were selected because they had the characteristics of true variants. This is why there is so much overlap between the distributions for Sanger validated variants and Not Sanger validated variants. (PPTX 121 kb)

Supplemental Notes #2. (DOCX 50 kb)

Allele frequency of variants with ACâ =â 1 in Exome Chip. The log10 allele frequency from the ExAC r0.3 database of variants from the Exome Chip with an allele count of one in our cohort is shown. 69Â % of the variants have an allele frequency less than 10^-3. (PPTX 66 kb)

Supplemental Notes #1. (DOCX 42 kb)