Search

A brief overview of some of the ethical and legal issues that relate to EOSC. This is a handout that has been used in the EOSC Future train-the-trainer course "Ethical and Legal issues and EOSC" taught between 2022 and 2023.

The FAIR data principles are rapidly becoming a standard through which to assess responsible and reproducible research. The Accessibility criteria, often thought to be the most straightforward of the principles, are focussed on whether data and metadata can be accessed electronically (as opposed to accessibility in terms of physical disability). However, this perception is predicated on the assumption that data and metadata is deposited in a trustworthy digital repository and access to the repository is of the same quality regardless of who accesses it. We present the findings of a pilot study that demonstrates that this implicit assumption is not necessarily a valid one. In particular this assumption may not hold when connectivity is poor (as occurs for researchers from Low and Middle Income Counties) or connectivity is blocked for specific users on the basis of the country that they reside in (referred to as geo-blocking). This paper presents the findings of a pilot study that clearly indicated that access to FAIR data resources is influenced by a range of geo-political factors. The paper will also outline what would be the next steps for the FAIR community to safeguard access to Open resources to researchers around the world.

These recommendations have been produced by the participants in the “Open Science in the South. Management and openess of research data : panorama and perspectives in Africa” symposium, held in Cotonou (Benin) from 25 to 27 October 2022, by African, European and Canadian organizations. In line with the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science and the Dakar Declaration (10.5281/zenodo.3577891)), these recommendations aim to support the implementation of a true culture of open science among African scientists.

Training Coordinators’ Community of Practice (CoP) Task Force on “Learning resources quality assurance” presents a generic framework and discipline agnostic recommendations for the quality assurance of learning resources and catalogues of learning resources and/or training/learning platforms that contain such resources. The generic QA framework defines the requirements that should be met in order to conduct QA in an efficient and effective way. The recommendations focus on online learning resources and take the form of self-assessment checklists of criteria, which are sufficiently general to cover many fields of application, while still being easily adaptable to specific use cases. In line with the generic character of the recommendations, content-related criteria (e.g. topics covered or accepted, accepted types and formats, etc.) are not elaborated on. On the other hand, in support of recent efforts towards establishing training platforms and catalogues of learning resources in Europe and beyond, special attention is paid to the criteria guiding the selection of resources to be included in a platform/catalogue.&nbsp

Presentation given during the webinar "RDA Webinar - RDA & Social Sciences" organised by RDA-Nordic on November 2nd 2022. Abstract of the presentation: The Research Data Alliance (RDA) hosts more than hundreds Interest and Working Groups around various topics related to (open) research data and innovation. For newcomers it can be difficult to navigate the RDA landscape and understand how it operates, and which groups may be relevant to follow. To support (new) social science researchers, DANS has created a report that gives an introduction to RDA and an overview of the groups most relevant for the social science domain. Louise Bezuidenhout and Ricarda Braukmann will present an updated version of this report first published in 2018. In addition, they will provide an overview of upcoming events, initiatives and changes within the RDA.

This upload contains the fourth version of a report describing the outcomes of a project that assessed the RDA Groups and Outcomes and their relevance for social science researchers in October 2022 . The report was updated by Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). &nbsp

This report summarises the methodology work done in task T6.2 of EOSC-Synergy focused on skills development and the “train the trainer” approach, as well as the university collaboration outcomes of task T6.3. This deliverable is complementary to the D6.2 that focussed on the Learn@Synergy platform release and also presents the evolution of the services provided in task T6.1 that has resulted as an outcome of user feedback., EOSC-SYNERGY receives funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 857647.

Microethics exercises used at the SRDS and aligned with school technical curriculum.https://www.datascienceschools.org/&nbsp

Versión al español de la charla "Ser abierto y responsable en el propio contexto de investigación"

This report provides a summary of the three schools run for early career researchers (ECRs) during the FAIRsFAIR project. The curriculum provides a broad but shallow introduction to the necessary technical and social skills in Data Science for Early Career Researchers. In particular there are modules in Open and Responsible Research, Software Carpentry (the Unix command line, R or Python, git), Research Data Management, Visualisation, Information Security, Machine Learning, Author Carpentry and Computational Infrastructures. The schools were originally designed to be an intensive two week school run on a face to face basis.

This report is a deliverable of the FAIRsFAIR project on thedata steward instructortraining hat was delivered during the course of the project.&nbsp

Posters of FAIRsFAIR outputs detailing sustainability plans used in the sustainability workshop on 27 January 2022.

This seminar is part of a series to provide societies and their journals with information and resources to help their communities be more knowledgeable and prepared to share data (and software) in a way that is relevant and meaningful for each discipline. This is a 12-month series. Democratization of Data 1 October 2021, 10am ET (1400 UTC) Speakers: Sabina Leonelli, Department of Sociology, Philosophy and Anthropology, University of Exeter (bio) Louise Bezuidenhout, Institute for Science, Innovation, and Society, University of Oxford (bio) Moderator: Doug Schuster, NCAR - US National Center for Atmospheric Research Description: Research is dependent on findable, accessible, and well-documented data. And yet there continue to be fundamental challenges in data access equity across disciplines, borders, and even teams. Research data needed for local and regional decision-making can be difficult to find, understand, or lacking altogether. Dr. Sabina Leonelli and Dr. Louise Bezuidenhout will share an overview of their around these challenges and recommend areas where societies can bring awareness and support improvements. Seminar Recording: https://youtu.be/OTNEQudyZuc, Special thank you to Laura Lyon of AGU and her support organizing and managing this seminar.

An introduction for data stewards into open and responsible research, covering Responsible Conduct of Research, Open Science and Responsible Research and Innovation. This forms part of the CODATA/RDA/FAIRsFAIR data steward training.

Presentation given at the November 2021 RDA plenary regarding surveying open data practices

3 language translation of SOPD survey used in Africa in 2020

Presentation on currentsurveying practices regarding data sharing surveys given to the RDA funders' forum 2021

Metadata template for data collected using the SOPD survey tool