Search

Direct FXa inhibitors are an important class of bioactive molecules (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban) applied for thromboprophylaxis in diverse cardiovascular pathologies. The interaction of active compounds with human serum albumin (HSA), the most abundant protein in blood plasma, is a key research area and provides crucial information about drugs' pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic properties. This research focuses on the study of the interactions between HSA and four commercially available direct oral FXa inhibitors, applying methodologies including steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), and molecular dynamics. The HSA complexation of FXa inhibitors was found to occur via static quenching, and the complex formation in the ground states affects the fluorescence of HSA, with a moderate binding constant of 104 M−1. However, the ITC studies reported significantly different binding constants (103 M−1) compared with the results obtained through spectrophotometric methods. The suspected binding mode is supported by molecular dynamics simulations, where the predominant interactions were hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions (mainly π–π stacking interactions between the phenyl ring of FXa inhibitors and the indole moiety of Trp214). Finally, the possible implications of the obtained results regarding pathologies such as hypoalbuminemia are briefly discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This review discusses reasons for prolonged use of anticoagulants after discharge of patients with COVID-19 without additional indication for anticoagulation. Data regarding rate of thrombotic and thromboembolic complications in patients with COVID-19 after discharge from the hospital are presented. Large randomized controlled trials EXCLAIM, ADOPT, MAGELLAN, APEX and MARINER with prolonged use of anticoagulants in patients hospitalized with acute nonsurgical diseases before pandemia of COVID-19 are discussed. The first prospective randomized controlled trial MICHELLE with direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban in a dose 10 mg once daily after discharge of patients with COVID-19 with high risk at least venous thromboembolism are analyzed. It seems that the most relevant approach for the determination of indications for prolonged use of anticoagulants in doses dedicated for primary prevention of venous thromboembolism after discharge of patients with COVID-19 without apparent indication for anticoagulation is a modified IMPROVE VTE risk score with the addition of elevated in-hospital D-dimer level. And the most well-studied approach for anticoagulation in these patients is a direct peroral anticoagulant rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for 35 (and possibly up to 45) days after discharge.

Atraumatic splenic rupture (ASR) is a rare condition mostly associated with neoplastic, infectious, and inflammatory diseases. ASR associated with drug treatment is even rarer. In this case report, we highlight an unusual complication of the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban. A 64‐year‐old male patient was admitted to the emergency department with complaints of faintness and diffuse abdominal cramps. The patient had no history of recent trauma. Clinical examination revealed hemodynamic instability with a moderate response to filling and mild abdominal discomfort on palpation. His medical history included chronic hypertension, constipation, and recent atrial flutter ablation. The patient was taking amiodarone, bisoprolol, atorvastatin, and rivaroxaban. Splenic rupture was diagnosed several hours later on contrast‐enhanced abdominal computed tomography scan. Massive blood transfusions and emergency laparotomy for splenectomy were performed. Anatomopathological analysis did not reveal any neoplastic, inflammatory, or infectious causes. The patient was successfully discharged from the intensive care unit 3 days later. Clinicians must consider the possibility of ASR as a complication of rivaroxaban in patients with abdominal tenderness and hemodynamic instability. Unfortunately, clinical presentation is not always typical of a ruptured spleen. Delayed diagnosis can be life threatening or fatal. Splenectomy via laparotomy remains the best therapeutic option in cases of splenic rupture in unstable patients on direct oral anticoagulants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Atraumatic splenic rupture (ASR) is a rare condition mostly associated with neoplastic, infectious, and inflammatory diseases. ASR associated with drug treatment is even rarer. In this case report, we highlight an unusual complication of the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban. A 64‐year‐old male patient was admitted to the emergency department with complaints of faintness and diffuse abdominal cramps. The patient had no history of recent trauma. Clinical examination revealed hemodynamic instability with a moderate response to filling and mild abdominal discomfort on palpation. His medical history included chronic hypertension, constipation, and recent atrial flutter ablation. The patient was taking amiodarone, bisoprolol, atorvastatin, and rivaroxaban. Splenic rupture was diagnosed several hours later on contrast‐enhanced abdominal computed tomography scan. Massive blood transfusions and emergency laparotomy for splenectomy were performed. Anatomopathological analysis did not reveal any neoplastic, inflammatory, or infectious causes. The patient was successfully discharged from the intensive care unit 3 days later. Clinicians must consider the possibility of ASR as a complication of rivaroxaban in patients with abdominal tenderness and hemodynamic instability. Unfortunately, clinical presentation is not always typical of a ruptured spleen. Delayed diagnosis can be life threatening or fatal. Splenectomy via laparotomy remains the best therapeutic option in cases of splenic rupture in unstable patients on direct oral anticoagulants.

A new scalable route to synthesize the factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor betrixaban is disclosed. The product is obtained in a seven-step reaction sequence (in five stages using two one-pot reactions) starting from easily accessible 4-(N,N-dimethylcarbamimidoyl)benzoate. Effective isolation of intermediates, use of cost-effective amide formation and 2-methyltetrahydrofuran as an effective reaction solvent as well as for extraction in three of the stages, are key features. The strategy provides the desired product in 38% overall yield with high purity (>98%).

Thromboembolic events are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. From the second half of the 20th century, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), warfarin and acenocoumarol, were the only anticoagulants taken orally. The major reform in anticoagulation therapy was made by the advent of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), about 10 years ago. Direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) and direct inhibitors of factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban) have demonstrated favorable risk/benefit ratio. Compared to warfarin, DOACs are associated with a predictable pharmacokinetic profile, lower severe bleeding complications, particularly intracranial hemorrhages, and minimal drug interactions. Moreover, DOACs achieve a rapid onset of action and have shown comparable efficacy with warfarin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in clinical trials. As a result, DOACs are now replacing VKAs and LMWH for many indications including stroke and systemic embolism prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, prevention, and treatment of venous thromboembolism and thromboprophylaxis following total knee/hip replacement surgery. In addition, rivaroxaban (in combination with aspirin alone or aspirin and clopidogrel) is used in the prevention of atherothrombotic events following acute coronary syndrome with elevated cardiac biomarkers. In case of severe bleeding complications under DOACs treatment, antidotes are available; idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal and andexanet alfa for rivaroxaban and apixaban.

Three eco-friendly spectrophotometric methods were developed for determination of the novel anticoagulant drug, betrixaban (BTX). The first method (method A) was based on direct analysis of BTX at 229.4 nm on the zero-order spectrum using methanol as the optimum solvent. While the second method (method B) was based on measuring difference absorption value (ΔA) of BTX at 335 nm, which was obtained from pH-induced spectral difference (difference spectra of BTX in 0.1 M NaOH versus 0.1 M HCl). The third method (method C) was based on measurement of the first-derivative amplitudes of BTX and its co-administered Ca channel blocker lercanidipine (LER) at 304 and 229 nm for simultaneous assay of BTX and LER, respectively. All methods were linear over concentration ranges of 1.0–20.0 and 8.0–80.0 µg ml−1 for BTX in methods A and B, respectively, and of 1.0–20.0 and 1.0–25.0 µg ml−1 for BTX and LER, respectively, in method C. The three methods were fully validated and assessed for greenness by three metrics: analytical eco-scale, green analytical procedure index and Analytical GREEnness metrics. The results indicated the validity and greenness of the proposed methods. Moreover, the methods were applied to assay the studied analytes in their dosage forms with high percentage of recovery and low percentage of relative s.d. values.

Patients hospitalized for an acute medical illness remain at risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) post-discharge. Betrixaban, an oral direct Factor Xa inhibitor, is approved for extended VTE thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate patients re-admitted with VTE within 30 days of discharge to determine if they would have been eligible for extended duration VTE prophylaxis during the index admission. We used three different sets of eligibility criteria: the APEX study criteria, the Bevyxxa® (betrixaban) package insert, and Mass General Brigham HealthCare System's Center for Drug Policy Guidelines. A secondary aim was to describe the reasons for ineligibility. Within 30 days of the index hospital admission, 226 patients were re-admitted with new VTE between January 2017 and December 2018. Of these, 134 (59%) were excluded based on pre-defined exclusion criteria. Of the remaining 92, 22 patients (23.9%) were eligible based on the APEX study criteria, 26 patients (28.2%) based on Mass General Brigham HealthCare System's Center for Drug Policy Guidelines, and 92 patients (100%) based on the Bevyxxa® package insert. There were 22 patients (23.9%) who were eligible for VTE prophylaxis with betrixaban based on all three criteria. Appropriate betrixaban use may have prevented some of the VTE events and re-admissions that occurred within 30 days of initial hospital discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

aim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA, USA; 2Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USACorrespondence: Gerald ChiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 930 Commonwealth Avenue #3, Boston, MA, 02215, USATel +1617 975-9952Fax +1617 975-9955Email [email protected] Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a known cause of morbidity and mortality, especially among acutely ill medical patients. Although VTE prophylaxis is part of post-discharge clinical care in surgical patients, there is controversy regarding its use in acutely ill medical patients and the current guideline statements suggest against its routine use. Recent clinical trials (APEX, MAGELLAN and MARINER) compared the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (including betrixaban and rivaroxaban) with the standard of the care, enoxaparin, to identify the risk–benefit tradeoff. In this review, we summarized the key findings from these trials and substudies and recent updates in society guidelines regarding VTE prevention. In addition, we discussed the potential barriers, cost-effectiveness, and COVID-19 with respect to the implementation of extended-duration or post-discharge usage of direct oral anticoagulants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is a laboratory and clinical need to know the impact of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on diagnostic tests to avoid misinterpretation of results. Although the regulatory labelling documents provide some information about the influences of each DOAC on diagnostic tests, these are usually limited to some of the most common tests and no head to head comparison is available. In this paper, we report the impact of DOACs on several thrombophilia tests, including assessment of antithrombin, protein S and protein C activity assays, detection of activated protein C resistance and assays used for lupus anticoagulant. Results are compared and discussed with data obtained from literature. The final goal of this comprehensive review is to provide practical recommendations for laboratories to avoid misdiagnosis due to oral direct factor Xa (FXa) or IIa (FIIa) inhibitors. Overall, oral direct FXa (apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) and FIIa (dabigatran) antagonists may affect clot‐based thrombophilia diagnostic tests resulting in false‐positive or false‐negative results. An effect on FIIa‐based thrombophilia diagnostic tests is observed with dabigatran but not with anti‐FXa DOACs and conversely for FXa‐based thrombophilia diagnostic tests. No impact was observed with antigenic/chromogenic methods for the assessment of protein S and C activity. In conclusion, interpretation of thrombophilia diagnostic tests results should be done with caution in patients on DOACs. The use of a device/chemical compound able to remove or antagonize the effect of DOACs or the development of new diagnostic tests insensitive to DOACs should be considered to minimize the risk of false results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Praktické Lékárenství is the property of SOLEN sro and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objectives: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) incurs substantial costs to the UK National Health Service (NHS). Betrixaban is approved in the US for VTE prophylaxis with a recommended 35-42 days of treatment. This analysis modeled the budget impact of introducing betrixaban for extended-duration VTE prophylaxis in nonsurgical patients with acute medical illness at risk of VTE in the UK, where it is not yet licensed.Methods: The 5-year budget impact of introducing betrixaban into current prophylaxis (low molecular weight heparin and fondaparinux) was estimated for the UK NHS. The Phase 3 APEX study provided primary event (VTE, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and death; all-cause or VTE-related) and treatment complications data. Literature informed risk of recurrent events and long-term complications, population, market share, and costs for treatment and management of events. Network meta-analyses informed symptomatic DVT, pulmonary embolism and VTE-related death rates in fondaparinux patients. Deterministic sensitivity analyses explored uncertainty.Results: Introducing betrixaban accrued savings of £1,290,000-£23,000,000 in years 1-5. Savings were from reduced primary VTE events, which reduced recurrent events and future complications. All sensitivity analyses showed savings.Conclusion: Introducing extended-duration VTE prophylaxis with betrixaban in the UK would accrue substantial savings annually over the next 5 years compared to current prophylaxis. Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT01583218. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

New guideline recommendations prefer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin in DOAC-eligible patients with atrial fibrillation and patients with venous thromboembolism. As expected with all antithrombotic agents, there is an associated increased risk of bleeding complications in patients receiving DOACs that can be attributed to the DOAC itself, or other issues such as acute trauma, invasive procedures, or underlying comorbidities. For the majority of severe bleeding events, the widespread approach is to withdraw the DOAC, then provide supportive measures and "watchful waiting" with the expectation that the bleeding event will resolve with time. However, urgent reversal of anticoagulation may be advantageous in patients with serious or life-threatening bleeding or in those requiring urgent surgery or procedures. Until recently, the lack of specific reversal agents, has affected the uptake of these agents in clinical practice despite a safer profile compared to warfarin in clinical trials. In cases of life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding or when patients require emergency surgery or urgent procedures, idarucizumab has been recently approved for reversal of anticoagulation in dabigatran-treated patients and andexanet alfa for factor Xa inhibitor-treated treated patients. The current review summarizes the current clinical evidence and scope of these agents with the potential impact on DOAC use in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acutely ill medical patients with cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Thromboprophylaxis is recommended in the presence of cancer, but its safety is not known. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of extended prophylaxis with betrixaban in cancer patients enrolled in the APEX trial. APEX was a randomized, double-blind trial comparing oral betrixaban 80 mg qd administered for 35–42 days with subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg qd administered for 10 ± 4 days. Patients with acute medical illness and a history of cancer or active cancer were eligible for inclusion. Primary efficacy outcome was VTE (composite of symptomatic VTE and asymptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis); primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Of 7513 patients enrolled in the APEX trial, 959 patients (12.8%), 499 randomized to betrixaban and 460 to enoxaparin, had cancer. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 5.7% of cancer patients treated with betrixaban and in 6.2% treated with enoxaparin (p = 0.95). No significant interaction according to the presence or absence of cancer was observed (p = 0.36). Major bleeding events occurred in 0.8% of patients in the betrixaban group and in 0% in the enoxaparin group (p = 0.13), with no significant interaction (p = 0.07). The composite of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeds was similar between the two groups (2.9% and 2.0%, respectively, RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.63–3.27). Betrixaban was similarly effective in the reduction of VTE among subjects with and without cancer. The incidence of major bleeding was similarly low. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiovascular diseases are the most common cause of death in the world. For almost 60 years, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were the mainstay of anticoagulation therapy, but in recent years direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become the anticoagulant treatment of choice. DOACs were initially considered drugs with no significant food interactions; however, clinical observations from daily practice have proved otherwise as interactions with food ingredients have been reported. Food, dietary supplements or herbs may contain substances that, when administered concomitantly with DOACs, can potentially affect the plasma concentration of the drugs. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the clinical significance of drug–food interactions of DOACs, such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban and betrixaban. Patients treated with anticoagulants should avoid products containing St. John’s wort and take special care with other food ingredients. As the interest in dietary supplements is on the rise, healthcare providers can contribute to the development of well-designed clinical trials on interactions between DOACs and food, and distribute sufficient knowledge about the proper use of these supplements among patients.

Abstract Background Among medically ill patients treated with thromboprophylaxis, betrixaban was not associated with an increase in major bleeding compared with enoxaparin, but an increase in clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding was observed. The aim of this analysis is to describe the severity and clinical consequences of major and CRNM bleeding in the APEX trial. Methods The APEX trial randomized 7,513 hospitalized acutely ill medical patients to receive either enoxaparin for 6 to 14 days or betrixaban for 35 to 42 days. Subjects receiving a concomitant strong p-glycoprotein inhibitor or with creatinine clearance

Introduction: Chromogenic anti‐Xa assays are the most appropriate tests to estimate the amount of betrixaban in plasma but the sensitivity of available tests is limited and improvements are needed to encompass the on‐therapy range. Methods: Betrixaban was spiked at concentrations ranging from 0 to 500 ng/mL in plasma from healthy donors. Three commercial tests were used (Biophen®DiXaI®, STA®Liquid Anti‐Xa, and HemosIL®Liquid Anti‐Xa), and adaptation of their sample dilution scheme was performed. These new methodologies were also tested on plasma spiked with amounts of unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparins (LMWH), or fondaparinux covering the on‐therapy ranges to evaluate their sensitivity to indirect factor Xa inhibitors. Results: Results showed concentration‐dependent decreases in OD/min inversely proportional to the dilutions. While modifications improve the sensitivity of these tests to betrixaban (eg, ½*OD/min of 502 ng/mL [95% CI: 495‐508 ng/mL] for Biophen®DiXaI® [1:50] is reduced to 51 ng/mL [95% CI: 50‐52 ng/mL] for improved Biophen®DiXaI® [1:5]), results also showed an increased sensitivity to indirect factor Xa inhibitors, except for Biophen®DiXaI® which remains insensitive to UFH and LMWH. Conclusions: Results showed that the improvement of current chromogenic anti‐Xa methodologies enhances the sensitivity of these assays to betrixaban but also to indirect factor Xa inhibitors. This lack of specificity may lead to overestimation of betrixaban concentrations in patients bridged with heparins. To avoid this cross‐interference, the use of the Biophen®DiXaI® may be a solution except for fondaparinux which remains active even in the presence of the Biophen®DiXaI®'s specific buffer. For the other chromogenic assays, the conception and validation of specific buffer is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of betrixaban for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis among critically ill patients.Methods: The APEX trial randomized 7513 acutely ill hospitalized patients to betrixaban for 35-42 days or enoxaparin for 10 ± 4 days. Among those, 703 critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit were included in the analysis, and 547 patients who had no severe renal insufficiency or P-glycoprotein inhibitor use were included in the full-dose stratum. The risk of VTE, bleeding, net clinical benefit (composite of VTE and major bleeding), and mortality was compared at 35-42 days and at 77 days.Results: At 35-42 days, extended betrixaban reduced the risk of VTE (4.27% vs 7.95%, P = 0.042) without causing excess major bleeding (1.14% vs 3.13%, P = 0.07). Both VTE (3.32% vs 8.33%, P = 0.013) and major bleeding (0.00% vs 3.26%, P = 0.003) were decreased in the full-dose stratum. Patients who received betrixaban had more non-major bleeding than enoxaparin (overall population: 2.56% vs 0.28%, P = 0.011; full-dose stratum: 3.32% vs 0.36%, P = 0.010). Mortality was similar at the end of study (overall population: 13.39% vs 16.19%, P = 0.30; full-dose stratum: 13.65% vs 16.30%, P = 0.39).Conclusions: Compared with shorter-duration enoxaparin, critically ill medical patients who received extended-duration betrixaban had fewer VTE without more major bleeding events. The benefit of betrixaban was driven by preventing asymptomatic thrombosis and offset by an elevated risk of non-major bleeding. The APEX trial did not stratify by intensive care unit admission and the present study included a highly selected population of critically ill patients. These hypothesis-generating findings need to be validated in future studies.Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01583218. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although venous thromboembolism prophylaxis of acute medically ill patients is commonly employed, a percentage of high-risk patients still have venous thromboembolic events within 30 days of discharge. Research over the last several years has attempted to identify characteristics of these high-risk patients to facilitate provision of extended prophylaxis and venous thromboembolic event reduction; however, extended prophylaxis has been associated with a significant increase in the risk for major bleeding until recently. Betrixaban, a new oral direct Xa inhibitor with once-daily dosing and limited renal elimination, significantly reduces the risk of venous thromboembolism without increasing the risk for major bleeding. Consequently, betrixaban is the only anticoagulant approved by the Food and Drug Administration for preventing venous thromboembolism with extended prophylaxis in acute medically ill patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Elevated D-dimer concentrations are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, they may also provide prognostic value. The present analysis sought to study the association of D-dimer levels with VTE event rates and the efficacy of betrixaban versus enoxaparin in the APEX trial. Methods Hospitalized acutely medically ill subjects (n = 7,513) were randomized in a double-dummy double-blind fashion to either extended-duration oral betrixaban (80 mg once daily for 35–42 days) or standard dose subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg once daily for 10 ± 4 days) for venous thromboprophylaxis. D-dimer was assessed using a central core laboratory measurement. Results For every 0.25 µg/mL increase in D-dimer concentration, there was a 2% increase in the relative risk of experiencing the primary efficacy endpoint (asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis [DVT], symptomatic DVT, nonfatal pulmonary embolism, or VTE-related death) in both the betrixaban (p

Byline: Rajesh. Malhotra, Ashna. Malhotra [INLINE:1] Prof. Virendra Nath Sehgal was an academician with several prestigious contributions to his credit. A graduate of the Government Medical College, Amritsar and a [...]

Despite significant advances in strategies and compliance with venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, hospital-acquired VTE remains a leading cause of preventable deaths in acute medically ill patients. A majority of venous thromboembolic events occur posthospital discharge when risk factors persist and pharmacoprophylactic regimens have been completed. Until recently, there has been an unmet need for safe and effective extended-duration VTE prevention. Three major trials evaluated this concept, but excess bleeding outweighed the benefit of reduced thromboembolic events. Betrixaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor recently approved for extended-duration VTE prophylaxis in acute medically ill patients at risk for thromboembolism based on results from the Phase III APEX study. This article reviews the pharmacology and supporting data for betrixaban. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Compared to other direct oral anticoagulants, betrixaban has a longer half-life, smaller peak-trough variance, minimal renal clearance, and minimal hepatic Cytochrome P (CYP) metabolism. The Acute Medically Ill VTE Prevention with Extended Duration Betrixaban (APEX) trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of extended duration betrixaban compared to standard duration enoxaparin in acutely ill hospitalized patients. Areas covered: This article describes the role of betrixaban in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in acutely ill medical patients. This article provides a consolidated summary of the primary APEX study findings as well as prespecified and exploratory substudies. This article also provides a review of the results of studies in which other direct factor Xa inhibitors have been evaluated in an extended duration regimen in this patient population. Expert commentary: While previous agents have demonstrated that extended duration VTE prophylaxis can be efficacious, betrixaban is the first agent to demonstrate efficacy without an increase in major bleeding. The totality of the data from the APEX trial supports extended duration betrixaban for VTE prophylaxis in the acute medically ill patient population. As such, betrixaban has been approved in the USA for extended VTE prophylaxis in at-risk acute medically ill patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Betrixaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor with a renal excretion of only approximately 5-7%. On June 23rd 2017, it became the first direct oral anticoagulant to receive Food and Drug Administration approval for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients, and the first anticoagulant agent to be approved for extended-duration thromboprophylaxis after hospital discharge in this setting. Approval followed the results of the APEX trial, a phase III clinical trial comparing betrixaban (80 mg) administered for 35-42 days with enoxaparin (40 mg) administered for 10 ± 4 days. This study for the first time applied a risk assessment model, integrating clinical factors and a laboratory marker to identify high risk patients. To improve safety, a dose reduction was used for patients with creatinine clearance between 15 and 30 mL/min (betrixaban 40 mg and enoxaparin 20 mg) and for patients receiving concomitant treatment with potent P-glycoprotein inhibitors (betrixaban 40 mg). The primary prespecified analysis tested the hypothesis that the benefit of extended thromboprophylaxis with betrixaban was greatest in patients with elevated D-dimer, but the 21% relative risk reduction failed to meet the prespecified threshold for statistical significance. However, the analysis of the overall study population showed a favorable net clinical benefit with betrixaban, with a statistically significant reduction in all efficacy outcomes and no increase in major bleeding rates. An ongoing trial, MARINER, is also assessing a combined approach for risk stratification comparing extended-duration rivaroxaban with standard duration low molecular weight heparin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Graphical abstract Abstract The use of warfarin, the most commonly prescribed oral anticoagulant, is being questioned by clinicians worldwide due to warfarin several limitations (a limited therapeutic window and significant variability in dose-response among individuals, in addition to a potential for drug-drug interactions). Therefore, the need for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with a rapid onset of antithrombotic effects and a predictable pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile led to the approval of five new drugs: the direct factor Xa (F-Xa) inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban and betrixaban (newly approved by FDA) and the direct thrombin (factor-IIa) inhibitor dabigatran etexilate. The advantages of NOACs over warfarin are a fixed-dosage, the absence of the need for drug monitoring for changes in anti-coagulation and fewer clinically significant PK and PD drug–drug interactions. NOACs exposure will likely be increased by the administration of strong P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-inhibitors and may increase the risk of bleeds. On the contrary, P-gp inducers could significantly decrease the NOACs plasma concentration with an associated reduction in their anticoagulant effects. This manuscript gives an overview of NOACs PK profiles and their drug-drug interactions potential. This is meant to be of help to physicians in choosing the best therapeutic approach for their patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose. The role of betrixaban in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in acutely medically ill patients and its efficacy and safety profiles are reviewed. Summary. Acutely medically ill patients have a high risk of developing VTE during hospitalization, and this risk continues into the postdischarge phase. Extended-duration betrixaban therapy has been evaluated in a large clinical trial (the APEX trial) and in a meta-analysis of pooled data on acutely medically ill patients. These studies have shown positive outcomes when betrixaban was compared with conventional-duration subcutaneous enoxaparin therapy for prevention of VTE in acutely medically ill patients. In parallel with these results, oral betrixaban therapy was found to be associated with a rate of major bleeding comparable to that associated with subcutaneous enoxaparin therapy; however, betrixaban use was associated with a higher cumulative rate of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. In the APEX trial, the primary endpoint was not met in 1 of the prespecified cohorts, but betrixaban appeared to confer benefit in another cohort and in the overall study population. Certain populations of patients, including the elderly, are at high risk for bleeding (mainly attributable to altered pharmacokinetics and polypharmacy); such patients are not appropriate candidates for extended-duration betrixaban therapy. Betrixaban can be a potential option for VTE prevention in medical patients; however, drug interaction potential and third-party coverage should be evaluated prior to prescribing. Conclusion. Betrixaban is an oral option for VTE prevention in medical patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients is a well-established practice. Despite the increased use of inpatient prophylaxis, the duration of hospitalization is typically shorter than the duration of VTE prophylaxis provided in clinical trials. In addition, VTE events after hospitalization are not unusual, with most events occurring within 30 days of hospital discharge. Therefore, the 30-day time period postdischarge has been identified as a stage in which patients are still at high risk of developing VTE. Attempts to provide extended prophylaxis with enoxaparin, rivaroxaban, or apixaban in patients with acute medical illness have been met with mixed results. Although some of these agents have reduced the incidence of VTE with extended prophylaxis, all of these agents have also demonstrated a significant increase in major bleeding that seems to offset any potential benefit. A recent trial of a new direct factor Xa inhibitor, betrixaban, demonstrated a reduction in VTE events with extended prophylaxis without significantly increasing the risk of major bleeding. Understanding appropriate patient selection, dosing, and outcomes associated with betrixaban will be important to potentially reducing the continued risk of VTE in patients with acute medical illness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hospitalized acute medically ill patients with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at increased risk for recurrent VTE. We characterized the efficacy and safety of betrixaban for prevention of recurrent VTE in these high risk patients. The APEX trial randomized 7513 acutely ill hospitalized medical patients at risk for developing VTE to receive either betrixaban for 35-42 days or enoxaparin for 10 ± 4 days to prevent VTE. This exploratory post-hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of betrixaban versus enoxaparin among subjects with and without prior VTE. Time-to-multiple symptomatic VTE events was also calculated. Approximately 8% of subjects in both arms had prior VTE, which was associated with a fourfold increase in adjusted risk of VTE [MV OR 4.03, 95% CI 3.06-5.30, p < 0.001]. Betrixaban reduced VTE compared with enoxaparin among subjects with prior VTE [32 (10.4%) vs. 55 (18.9%), RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86, p = 0.006, ARR 8.5%, NNT 12] and without prior VTE [133 (3.9%) vs. 168 (4.9%), RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.99, p = 0.042, ARR 1.0%, NNT 100] (interaction p > 0.05). Additionally, four subjects in the enoxaparin arm and one subject in the betrixaban arm experienced a recurrent VTE. Compared with enoxaparin, betrixaban use was associated with reduction of recurrent VTE events through the active treatment period [36 vs. 57, HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.97, p = 0.045] and through the end of study [38 vs. 71, HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.81, p = 0.004]. Prior VTE is associated with a fourfold increase in the risk of VTE among hospitalized medically ill patients. Only 12 such patients would need to be treated with betrixaban versus enoxaparin to prevent an additional VTE endpoint. Betrixaban reduced not only the first but also all recurrent VTE events in a time-to-any-event analysis. Trial registration: , Unique identifier: NCT01583218 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]