Search

Objectives Phyllodes tumors (PTs) are categorized by the World Health Organization (WHO) as benign, borderline, and malignant. Singapore General Hospital (SGH) nomogram is a recurrence risk assessment tool for PT, which uses cytologic atypia, mitosis, stromal overgrowth, and the surgical margin status. We studied the prognostic significance of WHO classification and its correlation to the SGH nomogram. Methods We identified 270 consecutive cases of PT (195 benign, 49 borderline, 26 malignant). Follow-up was available on 246 cases (mean follow-up of 51 months). Results The recurrence rates were 2% (4 of 176) for benign, 4% (2 of 46) for borderline, and 25% (6 of 24) for malignant (log-rank test P Conclusions The WHO three-tiered classification of PT is prognostic. Despite positive margin status, most benign PTs do not recur. Other features of the nomogram help in determining recurrence but are also used for WHO classification.

Magee Equations™ (ME) are multivariable models that can estimate oncotype DX® recurrence score. One of the equations, Magee Equation 3 (ME3) which utilizes only semi-quantitative receptor results has been shown to provide chemopredictive value in the neoadjuvant setting in a single institutional study. This multi-institutional study (seven institutions contributed cases) was undertaken to examine the validity of ME3 in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor positive, HER2-negative breast cancers. Stage IV cases were excluded. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in different categories of ME3 scores calculated based on receptor results in the pre-therapy core biopsy. A total of 166 cases met the inclusion criteria. The patient age ranged from 24 to 83 years (median 53 years). The average pre-therapy tumor size was 3.9 cm, and axillary lymph nodes were confirmed positive by pre-therapy core biopsy in 85 of 166 cases (51%). The pCR rate according to ME3 scores was 0% (0 of 64) in ME3 25 to 25 was significantly associated with shorter distant recurrence-free survival and showed a trend for shorter breast cancer-specific survival. The results of this multi-institutional study are similar to previously published data from a single institution (PMID: 28548119) and confirm the chemo-predictive value of ME3 in the neoadjuvant setting. In addition, ME3 may provide prognostic information in patients with residual disease which should be further evaluated.

The Prosigna® assay is a United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) cleared molecular test for prognostic use in hormone receptor-positive stage I/II breast cancer in postmenopausal women. We analyzed histopathologic features of 79 cases with Prosigna® assay results and found a significant correlation between tumor size, grade, and Ki-67 labeling index with Prosigna® score (0–40, 41–60, and 61–100) and Prosigna® risk categories. Since the Prosigna® risk stratification is influenced by lymph node status, we designed an index that included lymph node status and the two most correlated variables (size and Ki-67 labeling index). This was termed the size, nodal, and Ki-67 (SiNK™) index and is calculated as follows: (size in mm) + (pN × 10) + (Ki-67 labeling index). The SiNK™ index was divided into ≤40 and >40 to test its prognostic significance in a well-characterized dataset of 106 ER+/HER2-negative stage I–II invasive breast cancers treated with standard multi-modality therapy with long term follow-up (average 101 months follow-up). Patients with SiNK™ ≤40 showed significantly improved distant recurrence-free survival (96% distant recurrence-free survival in SiNK™ ≤40 compared to 81% in SiNK™ >40; log-rank test p value: 0.0027). SiNK™ provides strong prognostic information in ERo+/HER2-negative breast cancers. SiNK™ index is simple to calculate using data from routine pathology reports. This should be further evaluated in larger datasets.

Objectives SOX10 expression helps identify melanocytic lesions. Over time, novel uses have been identified, such as expression in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We evaluated the usefulness of SOX10 in breast pathology—specifically, identification and subtyping of TNBC and distinction from gynecologic carcinomas, use as a myoepithelial marker, and in the distinction of usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH) from atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH). Methods Several breast and gynecologic carcinoma tissue microarrays containing a total of 492 cases were stained with SOX10. Whole sections of 34 ADH, 50 UDH, and 29 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) samples were also stained with SOX10. Results SOX10 expression was identified in 67% of consecutive TNBC cases. Expression was mostly seen in nonapocrine, androgen receptor (AR)–negative TNBCs. All gynecologic carcinomas (n = 157) were negative. All UDH cases showed mosaic SOX10 expression, while all ADH cases lacked expression. All estrogen receptor (ER)–positive DCIS (n = 19) specimens were negative for SOX10, while 2 of 10 ER-negative DCIS specimens were positive for SOX10. The latter 2 cases showed SOX10-positive invasive carcinomas. Conclusions SOX10 identifies nonluminal AR-type TNBC and is useful in distinguishing TNBC from gynecologic carcinomas. SOX10 can distinguish UDH from ADH. SOX10 is not useful in distinguishing ADH from DCIS.

Magee Equations™ are multivariable models that can estimate oncotype DX® Recurrence Score, and Magee Equation 3 has been shown to have chemopredictive value in the neoadjuvant setting as a standalone test. The current study tests the accuracy of Magee Decision Algorithm™ using a large in-house database. According to the algorithm, if all Magee Equation scores are 25 (also “do not send”). All other cases could be considered for testing (labeled “send”). Of the 2196 ER+, HER2-negative cases sent for oncotype testing, 1538 (70%) were classified as “do not send” and 658 (30%) as “send”. The classification accuracy in the “do not send” group was 95.1%. Of the 75 (4.9%) discordant cases (expected score ≤25 by decision algorithm but the actual oncotype score >25), 26 received endocrine therapy alone. None of these 26 patients experienced distant recurrence (average follow-up of 73 months). The Magee Decision Algorithm accurately identifies cases that will not benefit from oncotype testing. Such cases constitute ~70% of the routine clinical oncotype requests, an estimated saving of $300,000 per 100 test requests. The occasional discordant cases (expected ≤25, but actual oncotype score >25) appears to have an excellent outcome on endocrine therapy alone.

Background: Magee Equations™ are multi-variable models that can estimate oncotype DX® (ODX) score (Flanagan M, 2008. PMID: 18360352 and Klein ME, 2013. PMID: 23503643). One of the equations (Magee Equation 3) has been shown to predict for pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+/HER2-negative tumors (Farrugia DJ, 2017. PMID: 28548119). We recently described a decision algorithm using Magee Equations and tumor mitotic activity score to safely forgo ODX testing (Bhargava R, 2019. PMID: 30395177). Methods: The current study tests the accuracy of Magee Decision Algorithm (MDA) using a large in-house database. According to the algorithm, if all Magee Equation scores are 25 (labeled as “do not send-expect high risk”). All other cases could be considered for testing (labeled as “send’). We analyzed all ER+, HER2 negative cases (including HER2 IHC 2+ cases with HER2 copies of 4 to Results: Of the 1824 cases, 1266 (69.4%) were classified as “do not send” and 558 (30.6%) as “send”. The classification accuracy in the “do not send” group was 94.6% (see table 1). Table 1:Do not send-expect high riskDo not send-expect low riskTotalActual ODX RS >25166783Actual ODX RS ≤25111821183Total1712491266Accuracy of “do not send”: 16+1182/1266 = 94.6%Ability to predict low-risk (≤25): 1182/1249= 94.6%Ability to predict high-risk (>25): 16/17= 94.1% We further examined the clinical outcome in 67 cases that were expected to show an ODX RS of ≤25 but the actual ODX RS came back as >25. Of these 67 patients, 36 received chemo-endocrine therapy, 2 received chemotherapy only, 24 had endocrine therapy alone (mostly an aromatase inhibitor), and 5 did not receive any systemic therapy. The average follow up was 78 months. The follow up duration was similar for the chemo-endocrine therapy group (inter-quartile range of 57-100 months) and in the endocrine therapy alone group (interquartile range of 60-97 months). There were 3 distant recurrences, 2 in patients that received chemo-endocrine therapy and one in a patient who did not receive any systemic therapy. No distant recurrences were recorded in the group that received hormonal therapy alone. Two of the patients with recurrence died of disease (one patient who received chemo-endocrine therapy and other who did not receive any systemic therapy). There were 2 other deaths in the cohort but the cause was unrelated to breast cancer. Conclusions: The MDA using Magee equations and mitosis score accurately identifies cases that will not benefit from ODX (or other similar) testing. Such cases constitute ~70% of the routine clinical ODX requests. If Magee algorithm is regularly used in routine practice, then it will save $300,000 per 100 test requests. The occasional discordant cases (expected ≤25, but actual ODX RS >25) appears to have an excellent outcome on endocrine therapy alone. Citation Format: Rohit Bhargava, Beth Z Clark, Gloria J Carter, David J Dabbs. Magee Decision Algorithm™: A safe and effective method to make therapy decisions without oncotype DX® testing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-03.

Mural nodules are rarely identified in cystic ovarian neoplasms, and have been categorized into sarcoma-like, sarcomatous, and anaplastic carcinomatous types. Most reports of these mural nodules have been described in mucinous ovarian tumors. In this case report, we describe an ovarian serous borderline tumor with mural nodules composed of high-grade carcinoma with anaplastic features and necrosis, including the morphologic features, immunoprofile, and results of tumor DNA sequencing. Omental involvement was also identified. Recognition of this phenomenon in serous tumors is important, so that thickened areas of cyst wall in ovarian serous tumors will be thoroughly examined.

The Prosigna® assay is a United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) cleared molecular test for prognostic use in hormone receptor-positive stage I/II breast cancer in postmenopausal women. We analyzed histopathologic features of 79 cases with Prosigna® assay results and found a significant correlation between tumor size, grade, and Ki-67 labeling index with Prosigna® score (0-40, 41-60, and 61-100) and Prosigna® risk categories. Since the Prosigna® risk stratification is influenced by lymph node status, we designed an index that included lymph node status and the two most correlated variables (size and Ki-67 labeling index). This was termed the size, nodal, and Ki-67 (SiNK™) index and is calculated as follows: (size in mm) + (pN × 10) + (Ki-67 labeling index). The SiNK™ index was divided into ≤40 and40 to test its prognostic significance in a well-characterized dataset of 106 ER+/HER2-negative stage I-II invasive breast cancers treated with standard multi-modality therapy with long term follow-up (average 101 months follow-up). Patients with SiNK™ ≤40 showed significantly improved distant recurrence-free survival (96% distant recurrence-free survival in SiNK™ ≤40 compared to 81% in SiNK™40; log-rank test p value: 0.0027). SiNK™ provides strong prognostic information in ERo+/HER2-negative breast cancers. SiNK™ index is simple to calculate using data from routine pathology reports. This should be further evaluated in larger datasets.

ObjectivesTo investigate use of Magee equations (MEs) to determine which breast cancer cases can be excluded from Oncotype DX testing.MethodsA prospective value study was carried out using data from pathology reports.ResultsIf all three MEs scores were less than 18 or 31 or higher, the cases were labeled do not send for testing. If any or all scores were 18 to 25, cases were labeled do not send if mitosis score was 1. Of the total 205 cases, 146 (71%) were labeled do not send; of these, the correct call was made in 143 (98%) cases. Two of the three discordant cases had associated nontumor factors, likely resulting in higher scores.ConclusionsCases with ME scores less than 18, or 18 to 25 and mitosis score 1, do not require Oncotype DX testing, an estimated saving of US$280,000 per 100 clinical requests.

PURPOSE Recommendations for standardization of breast biomarkers including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) led to the creation of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines to provide continuous guidance. Included in these recommendations is the "ongoing assay assessment procedures." We report these biomarker metrics as there is a dearth of published information on this topic. MATERIALS AND METHODS ER, PR, and HER2 positivity rates of all newly diagnosed, recurrent, and metastatic invasive breast cancers on core biopsies, and repeated testing on resection specimen by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were collected from April 1, 2008 to December 31, 2017. RESULTS The positivity rates of ER, PR, and HER2 over almost 10 years of monitoring showed high fidelity. Total ER-positive rate was 83.6% (81.4% to 86.8%), ER+/PR+ was 71.7% (68.6% to 75.5%), ER+/PR- was 17.6% (11.0% to 15.0%), ER-/PR- was 16.0% (13.5% to 18.2%), and ER-/PR+ was 0.6% (0.2% to 1.0%). The HER2-positive rate was 13.7% (10.2% to 17.4%) including 9.9% (7.3% to 11.9%) by IHC and 3.8% (1.9% to 5.9%) by FISH reflexed from IHC 2+ results. FISH amplification rate of HER2 IHC 2+ cases was 11.0% (5.8% to 19.2%). Annual quality-assurance check for HER2 IHC/FISH percent positive and percent negative agreement (as defined by Food and Drug Administration) was 96% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS This longitudinal active assessment of 9564 breast biomarker cases shows the achievement of high fidelity of breast biomarker results when following the ASCO/CAP guidelines. Continuous monitoring of breast biomarkers may minimize assay analytical drift and assure quality clinically relevant results.

AIMS Pathologists provide expert tissue assessment of breast cancer, yet their value to guide the appropriate use of breast cancer gene expression profile tests (GEPT) is underutilised. The specific aims of this study are to report morpho-immunohistological characteristics of breast tumours with Oncotype DX® (ODx) recurrence scores (RS) of 10 or fewer (ultra-low risk) and 25 or fewer (low risk) in order to determine if pathologists can identify prospectively patient tumours that do not require ODx testing. METHODS AND RESULTS Oncotype DX® cases with RS < 10 from 2005 to 2010 comprised 441 of 2594 (17%) of clinical cases; this cohort had 5 years' follow-up and was treated with endocrine therapy alone. Tumours were analysed for tumour type, Nottingham grade, mitosis score (MS) semi-quantitative (H-score) hormone receptor content and Magee equation 3. Knowledge derived from this data set was used to develop algorithms in order to identify prospectively tumours with RS of 10 or fewer or 25 or fewer. Thirty-four per cent of tumours were low-grade special types, while the remainder were enriched with high hormone receptor content with MS of 1. These algorithmic selection criteria identified correctly all patient cases below the chemotherapy cut-point, i.e. RS < 25, indicating that these oncotype test orders were an unnecessary cost. CONCLUSIONS This unique study demonstrates that (i) pathologists add great value to triage breast cancer for GEPT; and (ii) can identify prospectively low-grade tumour biology with high sensitivity and high specificity for those cases which do not require chemotherapy (RS < 25) using MS and hormone receptor content.

Objectives Pathologic complete response (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was compared between 141 estrogen receptor (ER)-negative (43%), 41 low ER+ (13%), 47 moderate ER+ (14%), and 98 high ER+ (30%) tumors. Methods Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive cases, cases without semiquantitative ER score, and patients treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy alone were excluded. Results The pCR rate of low ER+ tumors was similar to the pCR rate of ER- tumors (37% and 26% for low ER and ER- respectively, P = .1722) but significantly different from the pCR rate of moderately ER+ (11%, P = .0049) and high ER+ tumors (4%, P < .0001). Patients with pCR had an excellent prognosis regardless of the ER status. In patients with residual disease (no pCR), the recurrence and death rate were higher in ER- and low ER+ cases compared with moderate and high ER+ cases. Conclusions Low ER+ breast cancers are biologically similar to ER- tumors. Semiquantitative ER H-score is an important determinant of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Objectives We hypothesized that prognostic accuracy of the residual disease in breast and lymph nodes (RDBN) method, which is calculated using residual tumor size, nodal involvement, and tumor grade, may be improved by incorporating residual tumor cellularity. Methods Cases included 614 patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Tumor size was adjusted for residual cellularity of invasive carcinoma and used to calculate modified RDBN (mRDBN) and compared with unmodified gross tumor size (gRDBN). Results RDBN could be calculated in 428 cases. Relative risks of recurrence and death were significantly higher for RDBN-3 and RDBN-4 compared with RDBN-1. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative and ER-positive/HER2-negative subgroups (P < .0001). Conclusions Both mRDBN and gRDBN provide prognostic information, particularly in HER2-negative carcinoma; however, mRDBN showed better stratification of RDBN-3 and RDBN-4 patients.

Introduction The majority of publications regarding breast cancer GEPTs rarely supply detailed breast tumor histopathology in their outcome studies. As a result, the cost effective role of clinical risk assessment with histopathology of breast carcinomas tends to be minimized. The aims of this study are to characterize the details of breast tumor histopathology of patients with Oncotype Dx Recurrence Scores (RS) of 10 or less, and determine if Oncotype Dx offers value and clinical utility for patients with these low grade tumors Methods A total of 459 patients (18%) with Oncotype Dx RS of 10 or less were retrieved from a registry of 2558 patients with Oncotype Dx results. Patients had five years of follow-up with tumor registry and were treated with endocrine therapy alone. Tissue slides were available to review on 441/459 patients. Recorded details included (1) histopathologic type of carcinoma (2) mitotic score (MS), tubule formation, nuclear pleomorphism and Notttingham histologc (NG) grade. (3) Estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) semiquantitated by Allred Score and Histologic Score (H Score: strong 200-300, moderate 100-199, weak Results Patient ages were 33-92, with mean/median age of 60, and all had endocrine therapy alone. 148 of 441(34%) patients had carcinomas of “special types”, notable for low grade/good prognosis including tubular 22(15%), cribriform 15 (10.1%), papillary 17 (11.5%), and mucinous 28 (21%), along with 63 (42.5%) low grade classic lobular carcinomas and 3 (2%) low grade mixed ductal and lobular carcinomas. All 148 tumors had a MS of 1, were NG1 and had high ER HScores (280 median/263 mean) (Allred Scores 7-8) and high PR HScores (210 median/201 mean) (Allred Scores 6-8). The remaining 293 tumors were ductal carcinomas of no special type (NST), and 261/293 (89%) of these had a MS of 1/NG2. Of the remaining cases, 10 (3%) had a MS of 2/NG2, 18 (6%) had MS of 2/NG3 and four (1%) were MS3/NG3. Estrogen receptor H Score/Allred Score was strong (Allred Score 7-8) in 395/441 (89.6%), moderate in 45 (10.2%) and weak in 1 patient (0.2%). Progesterone HScores were strong in (Allred Score 6-8) 269/441 (76%) and moderate in the remainder. Strong and moderate ER comprised 99.8% of tumors. Thus, tumors with MS1, and NG1, all with ER HScore >200 (Allred Score of 7-8) were enriched in the RS At 5 years, 433 patients (98%) were alive, 8 were dead, 1 from breast cancer due to distant recurrence. The 5-year breast cancer specific survival for this group was 99.7%. [95%CI 98.5-99.9.] 87 cases were accrued in the ongoing prospective study to date. There were 15/87 (17%) cases, 95% of which were correctly identified by pathologists as having an RS 22. Conclusions Pathologists can identify these low risk tumors with high accuracy. Oncotype Dx lacks clinical value and utility in this setting. Citation Format: Dabbs DJ, Serdy K, Onisko A, Clark BZ, Bhargava R, Smalley S, Perkins S, Brufsky AM. The clinical utility of oncotype Dx for patients with recurrence scores of 10 or less: A value based pathology study of tumor histopathology and outcomes analysis in an integrated delivery and finance health system [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-08-04.

Background: Patients achieving pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy have excellent disease free and overall survival. For patients with residual disease, the residual disease in breast and lymph node (RDBN) method provides useful prognostic information. RDBN is calculated as follows: 0.2*tumor size (in cm)+lymph node status (0-3) + tumor grade (1-3). pCR, low, intermediate and high risk of recurrence categories correspond to RDBN index of 0, 0.1 to 2.9, 3 to Methods: Retrospective review of 614 consecutive patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer was performed. At our institution, tumor size/volume reduction in the breast is determined using the equation: Estimated % tumor size reduction = [(pre-therapy clinical size – “revised” pathology tumor size)/pre-therapy clinical size]*100. “Revised” pathology tumor size is calculated by multiplying the largest dimension of the gross tumor bed by the invasive tumor cellularity of the tumor bed (in comparison to the pre-therapy core biopsy sample). For example, if a 3 cm tumor bed has only 50% cellularity for invasive cancer (in comparison to pre-therapy core biopsy), the revised tumor size is 1.5 cm. Hence, we were able to use the “revised tumor size” for calculating the modified RDBN index (mRDBN). We also used gross tumor bed size for gross RDBN (gRDBN) to compare with mRDBN. mRDBN and gRDBN could be calculated on 459 of the 514 cases. Chi-Square statistical analysis was performed. Results: Mean follow up was 33.1 months (median 31, range 4-70). The results are shown in Table 1 & 2. Table 1. Overall Recurrence and MortalityRDBN Score Category Overall Recurrence Mortality nn (%)RR95% CI; pn (%)RR95% CI; pmRDBN (n=459)High5829 (50.0)19.63[7.22, 53.40]; p= Table 2; Reclassification of gRDBN categoriesgRDBN mRDBN ReclassificationClassificationnLow (%)Intermed (%)High (%)Low7272 (100)0 (0)0 (0)Intermed1498 (5.4)140 (93.9)1 (0.7)High810 (0)24 (29.6)57 (70.4) Conclusions: Both mRDBN and gRDBN provide prognostic information; however, separation of categories is improved with mRDBN (Table 1). mRDBN reclassified 30% of the high risk-gRDBN patients into intermediate risk category with a recurrence rate of 20%, leaving the 'true' high risk subgroup with a revised recurrence rate of 50% (Table 2). RDBN index also identified a group of low risk patients who have prognosis similar to patients with pCR. Citation Format: Farrugia DJ, Landmann A, McAuliffe PF, Diego EJ, Johnson R, Bonaventura M, Soran A, Dabbs DJ, Clark B, Lembersky BC, Puhalla SL, Brufsky A, Jankowitz R, Davidson NE, Ahrendt GM, Bhargava R. Prognostic significance of a modified residual disease in breast and nodes (mRDBN) algorithm after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-14.

Intertumor heterogeneity has been proposed as a potential mechanism to account for variability in cognitive performance in women diagnosed with breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to explore associations between variation in pathologic tumor features (PTFs) and variability in preadjuvant therapy cognitive performance in postmenopausal women newly diagnosed with early‐stage breast cancer. Participants (N = 329) completed a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests to evaluate cognitive performance after primary surgery but prior to initiation of adjuvant anastrozole±chemotherapy. PTF data were abstracted from medical records. Robust multiple linear regression models were fit to estimate associations between individual PTFs and the cognitive function composite domain scores. All models controlled for age, estimated intelligence, and levels of depressive symptoms, anxiety, fatigue, and pain. Diagnosis of a HER2‐positive tumor contributed to poorer verbal (b = −0.287, P = 0.018), visual (b = −0.270, P = 0.001), and visual working (b = −0.490, P

Objectives We present a retrospective review of 111 breast core biopsy specimens with flat epithelial atypia (FEA) and corresponding excision to better understand rates of upgrade following this diagnosis. Methods In total, 252 breast core biopsy specimens were identified. Cases were excluded if biopsy slides or excision results were unavailable, for ipsilateral carcinoma or other findings warranting excision, or biopsy performed for indications other than mammographically detected calcifications. Coincident atypical lobular hyperplasia was not excluded. Diagnoses were confirmed by breast pathologists, and mammographic images were reviewed. Results Ultimately, 111 biopsy specimens with FEA were included. In subsequent excisions, one (1%) of 111 showed invasive carcinoma, 20 (18%) atypical ductal hyperplasia, 20 (18%) lobular neoplasia, 31 (28%) FEA, and 39 (35%) no atypical findings. Conclusions FEA on core biopsy specimens is associated with a low rate of upgrade to invasive carcinoma. Close follow-up may be a reasonable alternative to excision for isolated FEA on core needle biopsy specimens.

Objectives To investigate use of Magee equations (MEs) to determine which breast cancer cases can be excluded from Oncotype DX testing. Methods A prospective value study was carried out using data from pathology reports. Results If all three MEs scores were less than 18 or 31 or higher, the cases were labeled do not send for testing. If any or all scores were 18 to 25, cases were labeled do not send if mitosis score was 1. Of the total 205 cases, 146 (71%) were labeled do not send; of these, the correct call was made in 143 (98%) cases. Two of the three discordant cases had associated nontumor factors, likely resulting in higher scores. Conclusions Cases with ME scores less than 18, or 18 to 25 and mitosis score 1, do not require Oncotype DX testing, an estimated saving of US$280,000 per 100 clinical requests.

Metaplastic breast carcinoma is a rare heterogeneous category of breast cancer, often associated with a poor prognosis. Clinical-pathologic studies with respect to varied morphologic subtypes are lacking. There is also a dearth of studies assessing the response of metaplastic breast carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cases of metaplastic breast carcinoma diagnosed between 2007 and 2017 were identified. Various clinical-pathologic variables were tested for association with survival. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy were assessed for pathologic response. Median age at diagnosis with metaplastic breast carcinoma was 64 years. With a median follow-up of 39 months, 26 patients (27%) recurred (24 distant and 2 loco-regional). The overall survival rate of the cohort was 66% (64/97). A number of variables were associated with survival in univariable analysis; however, in multivariable analysis, only lymph node status and tumor size (pT3 vs. pT1/2) were significantly associated with all survival endpoints: recurrence-free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival. Twenty-nine of 97 (30%) patients with metaplastic breast carcinoma received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Five (17%) patients achieved pathologic complete response. Matrix-producing morphology was associated with higher probability of achieving pathologic complete response (p = 0.027). Similar to other breast cancer subtypes, tumor size and lymph node status are prognostic in metaplastic carcinomas. The pathologic complete response rate of metaplastic breast carcinoma in our cohort was 17%, higher than previously reported. Although the matrix-producing subtype was associated with pathologic complete response, there was no survival difference with respect to tumor subtypes.

Biomarker analysis of invasive breast carcinoma is useful for prognosis, as surrogate for molecular subtypes of breast cancer, and prediction of response to adjuvant and neoadjuvant systemic therapies. Breast cancer intratumoral heterogeneity is incompletely studied. Comprehensive biomarker analysis of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and Ki67 labeling index was performed on each tissue block of 100 entirely submitted breast tumors in 99 patients. Invasive carcinoma and in situ carcinoma was scored using semiquantitative histologic score (H-score) for ER and PR, HER2 expression from 0 to 3+, and percentage positive cells for Ki67. Core biopsy results were compared with surgical excision results, invasive carcinoma was compared with in situ carcinoma, and interblock tumoral heterogeneity was assessed using measures of dispersion (coefficient of variation and quartile coefficient of dispersion). Overall concordance between core biopsy and surgical excision was 99% for ER and 95% for PR. Mean histologic score of ER was significantly lower in invasive carcinoma between core biopsy and surgical excision (p = 0.000796). Intratumoral heterogeneity was higher for PR than for ER (mean coefficient of variation for ER 0.08 stdv 0.13 vs. PR 0.26 stdv 0.41). Ki67 labeling index was significantly higher in invasive carcinoma as compared with associated ductal carcinoma in situ on surgical resection specimen (p ≤ 0.0001). Ki67 hotspots were identified in 47% of cases. Of 52 HER2 negative cases on core biopsy, 10 were scored as equivocal on surgical resection. None (0/10) were amplified by Her-2/neu fluorescence in situ hybridization. Overall, biomarkers on core biopsy showed concordance with the surgical excision specimen in the vast majority of cases. Biomarker expression of in situ closely approximates associated invasive carcinoma. Intratumoral heterogeneity of PR is greater than ER. Biomarker expression on diagnostic core biopsy or single tumor block is representative of breast carcinoma as a whole in most cases and is appropriate for clinical decision-making.

Pathologic complete response (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was compared between 141 estrogen receptor (ER)-negative (43%), 41 low ER+ (13%), 47 moderate ER+ (14%), and 98 high ER+ (30%) tumors.Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive cases, cases without semiquantitative ER score, and patients treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy alone were excluded.The pCR rate of low ER+ tumors was similar to the pCR rate of ER- tumors (37% and 26% for low ER and ER- respectively, P = .1722) but significantly different from the pCR rate of moderately ER+ (11%, P = .0049) and high ER+ tumors (4%, P.0001). Patients with pCR had an excellent prognosis regardless of the ER status. In patients with residual disease (no pCR), the recurrence and death rate were higher in ER- and low ER+ cases compared with moderate and high ER+ cases.Low ER+ breast cancers are biologically similar to ER- tumors. Semiquantitative ER H-score is an important determinant of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Background: Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) would be expected to have favorable outcomes compared to patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) given that ILC is more often hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, of lower grade, and displays decreased proliferation markers. Based on our preclinical studies showing differential hormone response in HR+ ILC vs. IDC and on recent studies suggesting differences in endocrine treatment response between patients with ILC vs. IDC, we designed a biomarker-driven, neoadjuvant window trial for newly diagnosed women with HR+, HER2-negative ILC. We hypothesize that Ki67 will be reduced by 85% in the fulvestrant arm compared with 60% and 75% reduction in the tamoxifen and anastrozole arms, respectively, and that Ki67 reduction will correlate with alterations in expression of ER and ER-regulated genes. Differential Ki67 effect will serve as a surrogate for outcome of patients with ILC on endocrine therapy. Trial Design: This multicenter study (NCT02206984) will enroll 150 women with HR+ and HER2-negative ILC. A mandatory research breast tumor biopsy will be performed at baseline. Fifty patients will be randomized to each of three open-label treatment arms for 21 days: fulvestrant (two 250 mg IM injections on both day 1 and day 14), anastrozole (1mg orally daily), or tamoxifen (20 mg orally daily). Biomarkers of response will be assessed on baseline and post-treatment tumor tissue. Patients will proceed to definitive surgery on day 21 after study drug exposure, or they will undergo a second research breast core biopsy if further neoadjuvant treatment is planned. Eligibility Criteria: Eligible patients include postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed, HR+, HER2-negative ILC (excluding pleomorphic subtype) measuring ≥ 1cm, with adequate organ function, ECOG PS ≥ 2, and agreeable to baseline research breast tumor biopsy. Specific Aims: The primary endpoint is percent change from baseline to post-treatment Ki67 values in ILC tissue after 21 days of endocrine treatment. Comparisons across study arms will be made using a general linear model adjusting for institutional effect, with 80% power estimated for pairwise comparisons of log2(% staining) between treatment arms, allowing for 10% attrition. Secondary endpoints include post-therapy Ki67, and change in ER and PR protein expression by IHC. Finally, planned correlative studies include evaluation of gene expression, epigenetic markers, and DNA sequence variants in ILC tissues in an effort to identify biomarkers of endocrine response and putative drivers of endocrine resistance in ILC. Target Accrual: This study will be open to enrollment by August 2015 at the University of Pittsburgh. Additional sites will be opened through the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC). We anticipate an accrual rate of 8 patients per month. (Funding from Susan G. Komen® and AstraZeneca). Citation Format: Jankowitz RC, McAuliffe PF, Sikora MJ, Butler L, Ahrendt G, Johnson R, Diego E, Bonaventura M, Puhalla S, Lembersky B, Clark B, Brufsky A, Kurland BF, Davidson NE, Dabbs DJ, Oesterreich S. A neoadjuvant window trial of endocrine response in women with invasive lobular carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-14.

Biomarker analysis of metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) is routinely recommended by ASCO/CAP guidelines, and establishing a diagnosis of MBC often requires immunohistochemistry (IHC). The reliability of breast tumor biomarkers and breast-specific markers on decalcified tissues has not been extensively studied. We performed IHC studies on breast tumors exposed to hydrochloric acid (HCl) and formic acid (FA) decalcification solutions, and HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization on a subset of these tumors to establish a protocol for handling bone specimens with suspicion for MBC. Fifteen fresh cases of primary breast carcinoma and 8 HER2+ paraffin-embedded core biopsy cases were studied. Fresh tissue was divided into 5 fragments to approximate a bone core biopsy. One fragment (control) was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. The remaining fragments were also exposed to FA or HCl decalcification for 1 or 5 hours. All fragments were embedded in 1 block and tested with an IHC panel. The known HER2+ cases were exposed to either 1 or 5 hours of FA, and HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization was also performed. Results were interpreted as follows: H-scores for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and GATA-3 were assigned from 0 to 300; HER2, cytokeratin 7, gross cystic disease fluid protein-15, Pax-8, TTF-1, cytokeratin 20, and mammaglobin were scored from 0 to 3+; and Ki67 from 0% to 100%. Mean scores were compared using the t test or Wilcoxon test for paired samples. No significant differences in mean score were seen between NF and 1 hour FA for any IHC immunoreactivity. After 5 hours of FA, only Ki67 average score was significantly less than NF. Mean scores for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2, Ki67, and GATA-3 were significantly lower than NF in the tissue after either 1 or 5 hours of HCl. Mean scores for gross cystic disease fluid protein-15, mammaglobin, and cytokeratin 7 staining were not significantly lower than NF after 1 or 5 hours of HCl.

Theresa A Koleck,1,2 Catherine M Bender,1 Beth Z Clark,3,4 Christopher M Ryan,5,6 Puja Ghotkar,1 Adam Brufsky,4,7,8 Priscilla F McAuliffe,4,8,9 Priya Rastogi,4,7 Susan M Sereika,1,10,11 Yvette P Conley,1,12 1School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 2School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, 3Division of Gynecologic Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), 4School of Medicine, 5Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 6Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 7Division of Hematology/Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, 8University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, 9Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, 10Department of Biostatistics, 11Department of Epidemiology, 12Department of Human Genetics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Purpose: Inspired by the hypothesis that heterogeneity in the biology of breast cancers at the cellular level may account for cognitive dysfunction symptom variability in survivors, the current study explored relationships between host single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 25 breast cancer-related candidate genes (AURKA, BAG1, BCL2, BIRC5, CCNB1, CD68, CENPA, CMC2, CTSL2, DIAPH3, ERBB2, ESR1, GRB7, GSTM1, MELK, MKI67, MMP11, MYBL2, NDC80, ORC6, PGR, RACGAP1, RFC4, RRM2, and SCUBE2), identified from clinically relevant prognostic multigene-expression profiles for breast cancer, and pretreatment cognitive performance.Patients and methods: The sample (n=220) was comprised of 138 postmenopausal women newly diagnosed with early stage breast cancer and 82 postmenopausal age- and education-matched healthy controls without breast cancer. Cognitive performance was assessed after primary surgery but prior to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy using a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests encompassing eight cognitive function composite domains: attention, concentration, executive function, mental flexibility, psychomotor speed, verbal memory, visual memory, and visual working memory. In total, 131 SNPs were included in the analysis. Standard and robust multiple linear regression modeling was used to examine relationships between each domain and the presence or absence of one or more minor alleles for each SNP. Genetic risk/protection scores (GRSs) were calculated for each domain to evaluate the collective effect of possession of multiple risk/protective alleles.Results: With the exception of CMC2, MMP11, and RACGAP1, significant (P

Magee Equations were derived as an inexpensive, rapid alternative to Oncotype DX. The Magee Equation 3 utilizes immunohistochemical and FISH data for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2 and Ki-67 for its calculation (24.30812+ERIHC × (-0.02177)+PRIHC × (-0.02884)+(0 for HER2 negative, 1.46495 for equivocal, 12.75525 for HER2 positive)+Ki-67 × 0.18649). We hypothesize that Magee Equation 3 scores from pre-therapy core biopsy can predict response to neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. A prospectively-maintained database of patients who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy from 2010 to 2014 at a single institution was retrospectively reviewed. Pathologic complete response was defined as absence of invasive tumor in the breast and regional lymph nodes. Of the 614 cases, tumors with missing immunohistochemical results and those that were ER negative or HER2 positive were excluded. This resulted in 237 ER positive, HER2 negative/equivocal tumors that formed the basis of this study. Magee Equation 3 scores were divided into 3 categories similar to Oncotype DX, ie, 0 to

Background: WoundStat (WS) (TraumaCure, Bethesda, MD) is a topical hemostatic agent that effectively stops severe hemorrhage in animal models. To the best of our knowledge, no survival study has been conducted to ensure long-term product safety. We evaluated vascular patency and tissue responses to WS in a swine femoral artery injury model with survival up to 5 weeks. Methods: Anesthetized swine received a standardized femoral artery injury with free hemorrhage for 45 seconds followed by WS application. One hour after application, the WS was removed, the wound copiously irrigated, and the artery repaired using a vein patch. Six groups of three animals received WS and were killed either immediately after surgery or at weekly intervals up to 5 weeks. Three control animals were treated with gauze packing and direct pressure followed by identical vascular repair and survival for 1 week. At the time of killing, angiograms were performed, and tissue was collected for histopathology. Results: Hemostasis was complete in all WS animals. All animals survived the procedure, and there were no clinically evident postoperative complications. Vascular repairs were angiographically patent in 15 of 18 animals (83%) receiving WS. Histopathologic examination of WS animals revealed severe diffuse fibrogranulomatous inflammation, early endothelial degeneration with subsequent intimal hyperplasia, moderate myocyte necrosis, and fibrogranulomatous nerve entrapment with axonal degeneration. Conclusion: Although an effective hemostatic agent, WS use was associated with a substantial local inflammatory response and neurovascular changes up to 5 weeks postinjury.

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is considered to be a risk factor for the development of invasive breast carcinoma, but it may also be a non-obligate precursor to invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Many LCIS lesions do not progress to ILC, and the molecular changes that are necessary for progression from LCIS to ILC are poorly understood. Disruption in the E-cadherin complex is the hallmark of lobular lesions, but other signaling molecules, such as PIK3CA and c-src, are consistently altered in LCIS. This review focuses on the molecular drivers of lobular carcinoma, a more complete understanding of which may give perspective on which LCIS lesions progress, and which will not, thus having immense clinical implications.

Low-grade fibromatosis-like spindle cell carcinoma is a rare tumor in the breast, and represents a variant of the very heterogeneous group of metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. These tumors warrant distinction because of their resemblance to pure fibromatosis, their propensity for local recurrence, and their favorable prognosis among the metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. The diagnosis is potentially challenging, particularly on core needle biopsies, because of the morphologic overlap with other low-grade spindle cell lesions. Recognition of a proliferation of cytologically bland spindle cells with areas of epithelial differentiation in combination with immunohistochemistry using antibodies against cytokeratins and myoepithelial markers should aid in producing a definitive diagnosis. These tumors can be locally aggressive with an increased incidence of local recurrence, but the potential for lymph node or distant metastasis is low. Complete excision with adequate margins is considered curative in the majority of cases.

Lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates in the breast, a modified skin appendage, include lymphocytic lobulitis, other nonspecific benign proliferations, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-type lymphoma. Distinguishing these entities, all of which may be B-cell rich and may have associated sclerosis, can be difficult. In addition, the proportion that represents IgG4-related disease is unknown, and the similarity of MALT lymphomas to primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma is uncertain. To address these questions, the clinical, histologic, and immunohistochemical features of 50 benign and malignant breast lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates (10 lymphocytic lobulitis, 1 granulomatous, 19 not otherwise specified, 20 MALT lymphomas) were evaluated. Compared with the MALT lymphomas, benign cases had a less dense infiltrate (P < .001), fewer but more histologically apparent germinal centers (P < .001), and more marked fibrosis (P < .0001). Greater than 60% B cells were present in 23% (7/30) benign cases versus 75% (15/20) MALT lymphomas (P = .0003). Plasma cells were predominantly IgG+ in 83% (24/29) benign cases and predominantly IgM+ in 73% (14/19) MALT lymphomas (P < .0001). None of the benign cases had greater than 50 IgG4+ plasma cells/high-power field, and only 1 lymphocytic lobulitis case had an IgG4/IgG ratio exceeding 40% and no clinical evidence for extramammary IgG4-related disease. Although there may be some overlapping features, routine histopathology together with limited immunohistochemical stains can distinguish benign from neoplastic lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates in the breast. Despite frequent sclerosis, the breast is not a common site of unrecognized IgG4-related sclerosing disease. Although there are similarities, breast MALT lymphomas can be separated from cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma.

The human epidermal growth factor receptor gene ERBB2 (HER2) is located on chromosome 17 and amplified in approximately 20% of invasive breast carcinomas.1,2 Due to the availability of effective anti-HER2 therapies, the prognostic significance of HER2 gene amplification, and the predictive value of HER2 status with regard to response to chemotherapy, laboratory testing for protein overexpression and/or amplification is critical for clinical decision making in individual patients. Testing of HER2 on all newly diagnosed invasive breast carcinoma is standard of care. Although there is no gold standard for assessing HER2 status in breast cancer, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for protein expression and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2 gene copy number are the preferred assays.3 Although no test is perfect, clinical utilization depends on a number of factors, including test accuracy but also consistency of results, as well as ease of performance and interpretation. Due to early standardization, consistency in reporting, and only a small number of equivocal results, the FISH assay became the preferred method for assessing HER2 gene status.4,5 FISH is also used as the reflex test in IHC equivocal (2+ score) cases. FISH on IHC equivocal cases can identify a small percentage of amplified cases but also aneuploidy and other difficult to assess abnormalities of chromosome 17. Despite its widespread use, the FISH assay does have some drawbacks. FISH is considered a morphology-based assay, but the fluorescent nature of the assay results in less than optimal histologic details (compared with bright-field microscopy), so the area of invasive tumor generally needs to be marked on a parallel H&E-stained section. The procedure …

Pulmonary sclerosing hemangiomas are generally regarded as benign lung lesions arising from type II pneumocytes and bronchial epithelium. In some cases malignant features may be present. There are several case reports describing the radiographic, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of pulmonary sclerosing hemangiomas. Given the potential for low-grade malignancy 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging may be useful in the diagnostic work up and therapeutic planning in these patients, however the FDG–PET imaging features of pulmonary sclerosing hemangiomas are not well defined. We report a case of histopathologically diagnosed sclerosing hemangioma of the lung which demonstrated intermediate uptake of FDG on the preoperative PET/CT evaluation.

There are a few studies that have evaluated a panel of stains on a single large data set of breast cancers, which is required for direct comparison between antibodies. The immunohistochemical panel in this study was chosen to include breast-specific markers and markers that are expressed in tumors resembling breast cancer. The individual marker positivity in decreasing order was 95% (177/186) for GATA-3, 92% (172/186) for cytokeratin (CK)7, 80% (151/189) for AR, 80% for estrogen receptor (158/198), 69% for progesterone receptor (137/198), 55% (105/190) for NY-BR-1, 52% (99/189) for mammaglobin, 31% (59/191) for vimentin, 26% (51/195) for GCDFP-15, 0.5% (1/186) for CK20, and 0% (0/188) for PAX-8. When tumors were categorized based on estrogen receptor and HER2 status; a total of 45 profiles were identified. In addition, some tumors showed an unconventional profile-although the majority of breast carcinomas were CK7-positive/CK20-negative, a CK7-negative/CK20-negative profile was seen in ∼8% of the cases. Such a profile can create confusion in investigation of a carcinoma of unknown origin. The results define the individual sensitivity of each marker and establish a baseline diagnostic profile of breast cancer in a large data set. In addition, the results support the use of immunohistochemical panel for confirming or determining breast as the source of metastasis.

BackgroundHuman acellular dermal matrices (HADMs) are used in a variety of settings. AlloMax is a new HADM currently being used for breast reconstruction and hernia repair. We compared the in vivo tissue integration of AlloMax to AlloDerm, a well-studied HADM, in rats.MethodsWe implanted AlloDerm and AlloMax patches into subcutaneous pockets on the backs of 32 male Sprague-Dawley rats. The animals were killed after either 4 or 8 weeks, and the patches were recovered and stained for histopathologic analyses. Microscopic end points included patch thickness, vascularization, tissue in-growth, fibroblast proliferation, and inflammation.ResultsAll animals completed the study without complications or infection. There were no significant differences in graft thicknesses at 4 and 8 weeks. Microscopically, at 4 weeks, AlloDerm sections had significantly more microvessels than AlloMax (P = 0.02). This disparity increased by 8 weeks (P < 0.01). Similarly, we found greater tissue in-growth and fibroblast proliferation in AlloDerm than AlloMax sections at 4 (P < 0.01) and at 8 (P < 0.01) weeks. Inflammatory infiltrates consisted of lymphocytes, histiocytes, eosinophils, and plasma cells. Deep graft infiltration by predominately lymphocytic inflammatory cells was significantly higher in AlloDerm than AlloMax grafts at 4 (P = 0.01) and 8 (P = 0.02) weeks. Graft necrosis was uncommon, but marginal fibrosis was similar in both.ConclusionsAlloDerm grafts had greater neovascularization, tissue infiltration, fibroblast proliferation, and inflammatory reaction than AlloMax grafts when placed subcutaneously in rats. AlloDerm may be better incorporated than AlloMax when placed in vivo.

Objectives: To evaluate GATA-3 immunohistochemical expression semiquantitatively in breast, gynecologic, gastric, pancreatic-biliary tract, urothelial, and vulvar/cervical squamous cell carcinomas. Methods: GATA-3 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 198 invasive breast carcinomas on tissue microarrays. Tissue microarrays of other tissues included 144 gynecologic tumors, 28 bladder carcinomas, 63 cholangiocarcinomas, 20 pancreatic carcinomas, and 62 gastric carcinomas. Full tissue sections of 10 invasive squamous cell carcinomas were also stained. GATA-3 expression was semiquantitatively scored using an H-score method. H-score greater than 10 was considered a positive result. Results: Of 186 breast carcinomas, 95% were positive (mean H-score of 217). GATA-3 expression was uncommon in 139 nonsquamous gynecologic tumors, with often weak reactivity (mean H-score Conclusions: Strong GATA-3 expression is a reliable marker of primary breast carcinoma in the appropriate clinical context. GATA-3 reactivity in around 70% of triple-negative breast carcinomas is also clinically useful. Significant reactivity in gynecologic squamous cell carcinomas suggests that GATA-3 alone cannot reliably distinguish these tumors from urothelial carcinoma.

612Background: While HER2+breast cancers demonstrate high rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy, there is a need to assess objective response in HER2 equivocal tumors. Methods: Retrospective chart review was conducted of patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) between 2010 and 2014 at our institution. Case inclusion required at least ER and HER2 status and pCR information. HER2 was measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with IHC 3+ and IHC 0/1+ cases considered positive and negative respectively. IHC 2+ cases were tested by FISH and classified using the 2013 ASCO HER2 guidelines ISH criteria for dual color probe. Cases were also classified by average HER2 copies/cell criteria. Results: 595 cases met criteria for inclusion. pCR rates according to HER2 status are reported below. Conclusions: Of the 46 patients with HER2 equivocal results, 31 (67%) received anti-HER2 NAT. 5 of 31 (16%) achieved pCR: 2 of 8 ER- (25%) and ...

580Background: ER expression can be semi-quantitatively measured using a Histochemical or H-score that can range from 0 (negative) to 300 (diffuse strong positive).. We sought to demonstrate a difference in pathologic complete response (pCR) rates after NAT between strongly positive and weakly positive ER+ breast cancers. Methods: Retrospective chart review was conducted of patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer who received NAT from 2010-2014 at our institution. Case inclusion required at least tumor ER status, HER2 status and pCR information. Low ER+ tumors were defined as tumors with ER H-score of 1-100 and their overall pCR rate was compared to that of ER negative (H-score 0), moderate ER+ (H-score 101-200) and high ER+ tumors (H-score 201-300). The data was further analyzed with respect to HER2 status. HER2 results were classified using the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 guidelines criteria. HER2 equivocal cases were excluded for this analysis due to small numbers. Univariate analyses were performed usin...

e23265Background: For breast cancer patients that do not achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), a straightforward prognostic indicator is lacking. The mitotic i...

Decreased or absent progesterone receptor expression in invasive breast carcinoma is a marker for an adverse prognosis. As part of an ongoing quality assurance study, this study evaluated the relationship between Oncotype DX recurrence score and progesterone receptor immunohistochemical result within each Nottingham tumor grade in 1074 cases of invasive breast carcinoma for which an Oncotype DX recurrence score was available. In addition to a statistically significant association between Nottingham grade and Oncotype DX recurrence score categories (P < 0.001), an inverse relationship was identified between progesterone receptor expression measured by modified H-score semiquantitation and Oncotype DX recurrence score that was independent of Nottingham tumor grade. The Oncotype DX recurrence score relies heavily on parameters already available from routine pathologic examination, and consideration of progesterone receptor status may aid in selection of patients most likely to benefit from ancillary testing.

The major differential diagnosis for a primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder with CD30 (Ki-1) positivity includes primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, lymphomatoid papulosis, pagetoid reticulosis and transformed mycosis fungoides (MF). Little is known, however, about CD30 expression in nontransformed MF, whether it simply reflects the proliferative fraction and if either CD30 staining or the proliferative fraction are of prognostic significance. Therefore, 47 nontransformed MF biopsies were stained for CD30 and Ki-67. The proportions of positive cells were determined and correlated with each other as well as with age, stage at diagnosis, maximum stage and survival. All cases had at least rare dermal CD30-positive cells. Higher percentages of dermal CD30 and Ki-67-positive cells were associated with a higher stage at diagnosis, and together with epidermal CD30, associated with a higher maximum stage. The proportion of CD30 and Ki-67-positive cells did not correlate with each other. Survivals were shorter if the dermal CD30 or epidermal or dermal Ki-67% were greater than the median (4.7%, 14%, 13%) and in patients of greater than or equal to 60 years of age or with a high stage. Dermal Ki-67 as a continuous variable was an independent prognostic indicator (P