Search

Objective. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) extracted from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) is a potential biomarker in radiotherapy (RT). DWI is often implemented with an echo-planar imaging (EPI) read-out due to speed, but unfortunately low geometric accuracy follows. This study aimed to investigate the influence of geometric distortions on the ADCs extracted from the gross tumor volume (GTV) and on the shape of the GTV in abdominal EPI-DWI. Approach. Twenty-one patients had EPI-DWI scans on a 1.5 T MRI sim before treatment and on a 1.5 T MRI-Linac at one of the first treatment fractions. Off-resonance correction with and without eddy current correction were applied to ADC maps. The clinical GTVs were deformed based on the same (but inverted) corrections to assess the local-regional geometric influence of distortions. Mean surface distance (MSD), Hausdorff distance (HD), and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) were calculated to compare the original and distorted GTVs, and ADC values were calculated based on a mono-exponential model. Phantom measurements were performed to validate the applied correction method. Main results. The median (range) ADC change within the GTV after full distortion correction was 1.3% (0.02%-6.9%) for MRI-Sim and 1.5% (0.1%-6.4%) for MRI-Linac. The additional effect of the eddy current correction was small in both systems. The median (range) MSD, HD, and DSC comparing the original and off-resonance distorted GTVs for all patients were 0.43 mm (0.11-0.94 mm), 4.00 mm (1.00-7.81 mm) and 0.93 (0.82-0.99), respectively. Significance. Overall effect of distortion correction was small in terms of derived ADC values, indicating that distortion correction is unimportant for prediction of outcomes based on ADC. However, large local geometric changes occurred after off-resonance distortion correction for some patients, suggesting that if the spatial information from ADC maps is to be used for dose painting strategies, co

Background and purposeThe SOFT trial is a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 trial investigating magnetic resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for abdominal, soft tissue metastases in patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) (clinicaltrials.govID NCT04407897). We present the primary endpoint analysis of 1-year treatment-related toxicity (TRAE).Materials and methodsPatients with up to five oligometastases from non-hematological cancers were eligible for inclusion. A risk-adapted strategy prioritized fixed organs at risk (OAR) constraints over target coverage. Fractionation schemes were 45–67.5 Gy in 3–8 fractions. The primary endpoint was grade ≥ 4 TRAE within 12 months post-SABR. The association between the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and clinical and dosimetric parameters was tested using a normal tissue complication probability model.ResultsWe included 121 patients with 147 oligometastatic targets, mainly located in the liver (41 %), lymph nodes (35 %), or adrenal glands (14 %). Nearly half of all targets (48 %, n = 71) were within 10 mm of a radiosensitive OAR. No grade 4 or 5 TRAEs, 3.5 % grade 3 TRAEs, and 43.7 % grade 2 TRAEs were reported within the first year of follow-up. We found a significant association between grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity and the parameters GI OAR D0.1cc, D1cc, and D20cc.ConclusionIn this phase II study of MR-guided SABR of oligometastases in the infra-diaphragmatic region, we found a low incidence of toxicity despite half of the lesions being within 10 mm of a radiosensitive OAR. GI OAR D0.1cc, D1cc, and D20cc were associated with grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity., Background and purpose: The SOFT trial is a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 trial investigating magnetic resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for abdominal, soft tissue metastases in patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) (clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT04407897). We present the primary endpoint analysis of 1-year treatment-related toxicity (TRAE). Materials and methods: Patients with up to five oligometastases from non-hematological cancers were eligible for inclusion. A risk-adapted strategy prioritized fixed organs at risk (OAR) constraints over target coverage. Fractionation schemes were 45–67.5 Gy in 3–8 fractions. The primary endpoint was grade ≥ 4 TRAE within 12 months post-SABR. The association between the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and clinical and dosimetric parameters was tested using a normal tissue complication probability model. Results: We included 121 patients with 147 oligometastatic targets, mainly located in the liver (41 %), lymph nodes (35 %), or adrenal glands (14 %). Nearly half of all targets (48 %, n = 71) were within 10 mm of a radiosensitive OAR. No grade 4 or 5 TRAEs, 3.5 % grade 3 TRAEs, and 43.7 % grade 2 TRAEs were reported within the first year of follow-up. We found a significant association between grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity and the parameters GI OAR D0.1cc, D1cc, and D20cc. Conclusion: In this phase II study of MR-guided SABR of oligometastases in the infra-diaphragmatic region, we found a low incidence of toxicity despite half of the lesions being within 10 mm of a radiosensitive OAR. GI OAR D0.1cc, D1cc, and D20cc were associated with grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity.

The clinical introduction of hybrid magnetic resonance (MR) guided radiotherapy (RT) delivery systems has led to the need to validate the end-to-end dose delivery performance on such machines. In the current study, an MR visible phantom was developed and used to test the spatial deviation between planned and delivered dose at two 1.5 T MR linear accelerator (MR linac) systems, including pre-treatment imaging, dose planning, online imaging, image registration, plan adaptation, and dose delivery. The phantom consisted of 3D printed plastic and MR visible silicone rubber. It was designed to minimise air gaps close to the radiochromic film used as a dosimeter. Furthermore, the phantom was designed to allow submillimetre, reproducible positioning of the film in the phantom. At both MR linac systems, 54 complete adaptive, MR guided RT workflow sessions were performed. To test the dose delivery performance of the MR linac systems in various adaptive RT (ART) scenarios, the sessions comprised a range of systematic positional shifts of the phantom and imaging or plan adaptation conditions. In each workflow session, the positional translation between the film and the adaptive planned dose was determined. The results showed that the accuracy of the MR linac systems was between 0.1 and 0.9 mm depending on direction. The highest mean deviance observed was in the posterior-anterior direction, and the direction of the error was consistent between centres. The precision of the systems was related to whether the workflow utilized the internal image registration algorithm of the MR linac. Workflows using the internal registration algorithm led to a worse precision (0.2-0.7 mm) compared to workflows where the algorithm was decoupled (0.2 mm). In summary, the spatial deviation between planned and delivered dose of MR-guided ART at the two MR linac systems was well below 1 mm and thus acceptable for clinical use.