Search

PDF file - 158K

PDF file - 309K

Purpose: Elevated levels or increases in circulating tumor cells (CTC) portend poor prognosis in patients with epithelial cancers. Less is known about CTCs as surrogate endpoints or their use for predictive biomarker evaluation. This study investigated the utility of CTC enumeration and characterization using the CellSearch platform, as well as mutation detection in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Experimental Design: Forty-one patients were enrolled in a single-arm phase II clinical trial of erlotinib and pertuzumab. Peripheral blood was analyzed for CTC enumeration, EGFR expression in CTCs, and detection of oncogenic mutations in CTCs and ctDNA. Changes in CTC levels were correlated with 2[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose–positron emission tomographic (FDG-PET) and computed tomographic (CT) imaging and survival endpoints.Results: CTCs were detected (≥1 CTC) at baseline in 78% of patients. Greater sensitivity for mutation detection was observed in ctDNA than in CTCs and detected mutations were strongly concordant with mutation status in matched tumor. Higher baseline CTC counts were associated with response to treatment by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, P = 0.009) and decreased CTC counts upon treatment were associated with FDG-PET and RECIST response (P = 0.014 and P = 0.019) and longer progression-free survival (P = 0.050).Conclusion: These data provide evidence of a correlation between decreases in CTC counts and radiographic response by either FDG-PET or RECIST in patients with advanced NSCLC. These findings require prospective validation but suggest a potential role for using CTC decreases as an early indication of response to therapy and ctDNA for real-time assessment of mutation status from blood. Clin Cancer Res; 18(8); 2391–401. ©2012 AACR.

Purpose: Assessing clinical activity of molecularly targeted anticancer agents, especially in the absence of tumor shrinkage, is challenging. To evaluate on-treatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and/or 18F-fluorodeoxythymidine (FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) for this purpose, we conducted a prospective multicenter trial assessing PET response rates and associations with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 2nd/3rd-line non–small-cell lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib.Experimental Design: PET/computed tomography (CT) scans were conducted at baseline, day (d)14 and d56 after the first daily erlotinib dose, with diagnostic CT at baseline and d56 (all scans centrally reviewed). PET partial metabolic response (PMR) was defined as a mean decrease (in ≤5 lesions/patient) of 15% or more maximum standardized uptake value. PFS was investigator-determined.Results: Of 74 erlotinib-treated patients, 51 completed all imaging assessments through d56; 13 of 51 (26%) FDG-evaluable patients had PMR at d14, as did 9 of 50 (18%) FLT-evaluable patients. Four (7.8%) showed partial responses (PR) by d56 CT; all 4 had PMR by d14 FDG-PET with 3 PMRs by d14 FLT-PET. Three of the 4 patients with CT PR had evaluable archival tumor tissue; all 3 had epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. D14 and d56 PMRs by FDG or FLT were associated with improved PFS; HRs for PET responders versus nonresponders were 0.3 to 0.4. D14 FDG-PET PMR was associated with improved OS (P = 0.03) compared with FDG-PET nonresponders.Conclusion: Early (d14) FDG-PET PMR is associated with improved PFS and OS, even in the absence of subsequent Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response. These data support inclusion of FDG-PET imaging in clinical trials testing novel targeted therapies, particularly those with anticipated cytostatic effects. Clin Cancer Res; 17(10); 3304–15. ©2011 AACR.

PDF file - 337K

A. PET uptake in the circulation per cohort, as determined by region of interest drawn in left ventricle; cohort 1 (in blue) contained 2 patients (0 mg additional MMOT0530A), cohort 2 (in green) contained 9 patients (10 mg additional MMOT0530A). On X axis the different PET moments: 2, 4 and 7 days post injection. On the Y axis the mean SUVmax per cohort.

PDF file - 181K

Supplementary figure legend

Purpose: Mesothelin (MSLN) is frequently overexpressed in pancreatic and ovarian cancers, making it a potential drug target. We performed an 89Zr-PET imaging study with MMOT0530A, a MSLN antibody, in conjunction with a phase I study with the antibody–drug conjugate DMOT4039A, containing MMOT0530A bound to MMAE. The aim was to study antibody tumor uptake, whole-body distribution, and relation between uptake, response to treatment, and MSLN expression.Experimental Design: Before DMOT4039A treatment, patients received 37 MBq 89Zr-MMOT0530A followed by PET/CT imaging 2, 4, and 7 days postinjection. Tracer uptake was expressed as standardized uptake value (SUV). MSLN expression was determined with immunohistochemistry (IHC) on archival tumor tissue.Results: Eleven patients were included, 7 with pancreatic and 4 with ovarian cancer. IHC MSLN expression varied from absent to strong. Suitable tracer antibody dose was 10 mg MMOT0530A and optimal imaging time was 4 and 7 days postinjection. Tumor tracer uptake occurred in 37 lesions with mean SUVmax of 13.1 (±7.5) on PET 4 days postinjection, with 11.5 (±7.5) in (N = 17) pancreatic and 14.5 (±8.7) in (N = 20) ovarian cancer lesions. Within patients, a mean 2.4-fold (±1.10) difference in uptake between tumor lesions existed. Uptake in blood, liver, kidneys, spleen, and intestine reflected normal antibody distribution. Tracer tumor uptake was correlated to IHC. Best response to DMOT4039A was partial response in one patient.Conclusions: With 89Zr-MMOT0530A-PET, pancreatic and ovarian cancer lesions as well as antibody biodistribution could be visualized. This technique can potentially guide individualized antibody-based treatment. Clin Cancer Res; 22(7); 1642–52. ©2015 AACR.

Supplementary Figure S1; Supplementary Table S1.

Breast cancer comprises a group of distinct subtypes that despite having similar histologic appearances, have very different metastatic potentials. Being able to identify the biological driving force, even for a subset of patients, is crucially important given the large population of women diagnosed with breast cancer. Here, we show that within a subset of patients characterized by relatively high estrogen receptor expression for their age, the occurrence of metastases is strongly predicted by a homogeneous gene expression pattern almost entirely consisting of cell cycle genes (5-year odds ratio of metastasis, 24.0; 95% confidence interval, 6.0-95.5). Overexpression of this set of genes is clearly associated with an extremely poor outcome, with the 10-year metastasis-free probability being only 24% for the poor group, compared with 85% for the good group. In contrast, this gene expression pattern is much less correlated with the outcome in other patient subpopulations. The methods described here also illustrate the value of combining clinical variables, biological insight, and machine-learning to dissect biological complexity. Our work presented here may contribute a crucial step towards rational design of personalized treatment.

Supplementary Tables S1-S4 from A Cell Proliferation Signature Is a Marker of Extremely Poor Outcome in a Subpopulation of Breast Cancer Patients

Supplementary Figures S1-S10 from A Cell Proliferation Signature Is a Marker of Extremely Poor Outcome in a Subpopulation of Breast Cancer Patients

Methods, Figure legends

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), by reinvigorating CD8+ T cell mediated immunity, have revolutionized cancer therapy. Yet, the systemic CD8+ T cell distribution, a potential biomarker of ICI response, remains poorly characterized. We assessed safety, imaging dose and timing, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of zirconium-89-labeled, CD8-specific, one-armed antibody positron emission tomography tracer 89ZED88082A in patients with solid tumors before and ~30 days after starting ICI therapy (NCT04029181). No tracer-related side effects occurred. Positron emission tomography imaging with 10 mg antibody revealed 89ZED88082A uptake in normal lymphoid tissues, and tumor lesions across the body varying within and between patients two days after tracer injection (n = 38, median patient maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) 5.2, IQI 4.0–7.4). Higher SUVmax was associated with mismatch repair deficiency and longer overall survival. Uptake was higher in lesions with stromal/inflamed than desert immunophenotype. Tissue radioactivity was localized to areas with immunohistochemically confirmed CD8 expression. Re-imaging patients on treatment showed no change in average (geometric mean) tumor tracer uptake compared to baseline, but individual lesions showed diverse changes independent of tumor response. The imaging data suggest enormous heterogeneity in CD8+ T cell distribution and pharmacodynamics within and between patients. In conclusion, 89ZED88082A can characterize the complex dynamics of CD8+ T cells in the context of ICIs, and may inform immunotherapeutic treatments.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), by reinvigorating CD8

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a common long‐term debilitating toxicity of antimicrotubule agents. PN was the most frequent adverse event resulting in dose modifications and/or discontinuation of treatment for valine‐citrulline‐monomethylauristatin E antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) developed at Genentech. A pooled time‐to‐event analysis across eight ADCs (~700 patients) was performed to evaluate the relationship between the ADC exposure and the risk for developing a clinically significant (grade ≥ 2) PN. In addition, the impact of demographic and pathophysiological risk factors on the risk for PN was explored. The time‐to‐event analysis suggested that the development of PN risk increased with ADC exposure, treatment duration, body weight, and previously reported PN. This model can be used to inform clinical strategies such as adaptations to dosing regimen and/or treatment duration as well as inform clinical eligibility to reduce the incidence of grade ≥ 2 PN.

Six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of prostate-1 (STEAP1) is a relatively newly identified target in prostate cancer. We evaluated the ability of PET/CT with (89)Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A, an antibody that recognizes STEAP1, to detect lesions in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: Nineteen mCRPC patients were prospectively imaged using approximately 185 MBq/10 mg of (89)Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A. (89)Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A PET/CT images obtained 4–7 d after injection were compared with bone and CT scans. Uptake in lesions was measured. Fifteen patients were treated with an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) based on MSTP2109A; ADC treatment–related data were correlated with tumor uptake by PET imaging. Bone or soft-tissue biopsy samples were evaluated. Results: No significant toxicity occurred. Excellent uptake was observed in bone and soft-tissue disease. Median SUV(max) was 20.6 in bone and 16.8 in soft tissue. Sixteen of 17 lesions biopsied were positive on (89)Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A, and all sites were histologically positive (1 on repeat biopsy). Bayesian analysis resulted in a best estimate of 86% of histologically positive lesions being true-positive on imaging (95% confidence interval, 75%–100%). There was no correlation between SUV(max) tumor uptake and STEAP1 immunohistochemistry, survival after ADC treatment, number of ADC treatment cycles, or change in prostate-specific antigen level. Conclusion: (89)Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A is well tolerated and shows localization in mCRPC sites in bone and soft tissue. Given the high SUV in tumor and localization of a large number of lesions, this reagent warrants further exploration as a companion diagnostic in patients undergoing STEAP1-directed therapy.

Programmed cell death protein-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) blockade is effective in a subset of patients with several tumor types, but predicting patient benefit using approved diagnostics is inexact, as some patients with PD-L1-negative tumors also show clinical benefit1,2. Moreover, all biopsy-based tests are subject to the errors and limitations of invasive tissue collection3-11. Preclinical studies of positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging with antibodies to PD-L1 suggested that this imaging method might be an approach to selecting patients12,13. Such a technique, however, requires substantial clinical development and validation. Here we present the initial results from a first-in-human study to assess the feasibility of imaging with zirconium-89-labeled atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1), including biodistribution, and secondly test its potential to predict response to PD-L1 blockade (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT02453984 and NCT02478099). We imaged 22 patients across three tumor types before the start of atezolizumab therapy. The PET signal, a function of tracer exposure and target expression, was high in lymphoid tissues and at sites of inflammation. In tumors, uptake was generally high but heterogeneous, varying within and among lesions, patients, and tumor types. Intriguingly, clinical responses in our patients were better correlated with pretreatment PET signal than with immunohistochemistry- or RNA-sequencing-based predictive biomarkers, encouraging further development of molecular PET imaging for assessment of PD-L1 status and clinical response prediction.

Bispecific antibody production using single host cells has been a new advancement in the antibody engineering field. We previously showed comparable in vitro biological activity and in vivo mouse pharmacokinetics (PK) for two novel single cell variants (v10 and v11) and one traditional dual cell in vitro-assembled anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/CD3 T-cell dependent bispecific (TDB) antibodies. Here, we extended our previous work to assess single cell-produced bispecific variants of a novel TDB against FcRH5, a B-cell lineage marker expressed on multiple myeloma (MM) tumor cells. An in vitro-assembled anti- FcRH5/CD3 TDB antibody was previously developed as a potential treatment option for MM. Two bispecific antibody variants (designs v10 and v11) for manufacturing anti-FcRH5/CD3 TDB in single cells were compared to in vitro-assembled TDB in a dual-cell process to understand whether differences in antibody design and production led to any major differences in their in vitro biological activity, in vivo mouse PK, and PK/pharmacodynamics (PD) or immunogenicity in cynomolgus monkeys (cynos). The binding, in vitro potencies, in vitro pharmacological activities and in vivo PK in mice and cynos of these single cell TDBs were comparable to those of the in vitro-assembled TDB. In addition, the single cell and in vitro-assembled TDBs exhibited robust PD activity and comparable immunogenicity in cynos. Overall, these studies demonstrate that single cell-produced and in vitro-assembled anti-FcRH5/CD3 T-cell dependent bispecific antibodies have similar in vitro and in vivo properties, and support further development of single-cell production method for anti-FcRH5/CD3 TDBs and other single-cell bispecifics.

vc-MMAE antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) consist of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) covalently bound with a potent anti-mitotic toxin (MMAE) through a protease-labile valine-citrulline (vc) linker. The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and explore exposure–response relationships of eight vc-MMAE ADCs, against different targets and for diverse tumor indications, using data from eight first-in-human Phase 1 studies. PK parameters of the three analytes, namely antibody-conjugated MMAE (acMMAE), total antibody, and unconjugated MMAE, were estimated using non-compartmental approaches and compared across the eight vc-MMAE ADCs. Relationships between analytes were assessed by linear regression. Exposure–response relationships were explored with key efficacy (objective response rate) and safety (Grade 2+ peripheral neuropathy) endpoints. PK profiles of acMMAE, total antibody and unconjugated MMAE following the first dose of 2.4 mg/kg were comparable across the eight ADCs; the exposure differences between molecules were small relative to the inter-subject variability. acMMAE exposure was strongly correlated with total antibody exposure for all the eight ADCs, but such correlation was less evident between acMMAE and unconjugated MMAE exposure. For multiple ADCs evaluated, efficacy and safety endpoints appeared to correlate well with acMMAE exposure, but not with unconjugated MMAE over the doses tested. PK of vc-MMAE ADCs was well characterized and demonstrated remarkable similarity at 2.4 mg/kg across the eight ADCs. Results from analyte correlation and exposure–response relationship analyses suggest that measurement of acMMAE analyte alone might be adequate for vc-MMAE ADCs to support the clinical pharmacology strategy used during late-stage clinical development.

T cell enhancing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are effective across several tumor types in a subset of patients. Insights into systemic localization of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells might support early treatment decisions. To address this, we performed a PET imaging study with a zirconium-89 (89Zr) labeled one-armed CD8-specific antibody 89ZED88082A to assess tracer performance, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) before and during treatment. Here we report preliminary data on uptake in tumor lesions before ICI. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors that may benefit from ICI are eligible. In part A (imaging before treatment) and part B (imaging before and during treatment), 37 MBq (1 mCi) 89ZED88082A is administered with unlabeled one-armed antibody CED88004S to vary total protein dose. PET images are acquired at up to 4 time points: 1 h, and days (d) 2, 4, 7 post-injection followed by a tumor biopsy for CD8 immunohistochemistry and autoradiography (NCT04029181). Subsequently, patients receive atezolizumab (NCT02478099) or standard of care nivolumab ± ipilimumab. Tumor and lymph node 89ZED88082A uptake are assessed as (geometric mean) maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), in other organs as SUVmean. Serum 89ZED88082A/CED88004S levels are measured for PK. Tumor response is according to (i)RECIST1.1. Results: For pretreatment imaging results, 32 patients (9 part A, 23 part B) were evaluable; 3 received 4 mg total tracer protein dose, 29 received 10 mg. No tracer infusion-related reactions occurred. Here we show results on d2 PET imaging with 10 mg protein dose, which was considered optimal based on superior 89Zr blood pool activity, clinical feasibility and serum antibody PK with a half-life of 28.6 h. 89ZED88082A uptake was observed within 1 h in spleen, and strong d2 imaging signal was seen across lymphoid organs including spleen (\bar{x}$ SUVmean 47.2), lymph nodes (SUVmax 4.2), bone marrow (\bar{x}$ SUVmean 5.0), small bowel and Waldeyer's ring. 89ZED88082A tumor uptake was seen at all main metastatic organ sites (overall lesion SUVmax 5.5, range 0.6-30.9) and varied across patients (\bar{x}$ per patient SUVmax 5.4, IQR 3.8-7.4). Higher tumor uptake showed a trend with better response (p=0.059) and longer PFS (p=0.033). Tumor uptake was higher in patients with mismatch-repair deficient (dMMR) than MMR proficient tumors (SUVmax 9.3 vs 4.9, p Citation Format: Laura Kist de Ruijter, Pim P. van de Donk, Jahlisa S. Hooiveld-Noeken, Danique Giesen, Alexander Ungewickell, Bernard M. Fine, Simon P. Williams, Sandra M. Sanabria Bohorquez, Mahesh Yadav, Hartmut Koeppen, Jing Jing, Sebastian Guelman, Mark T. Lin, Michael J. Mamounas, Jeffrey Eastham, Patrick K. Kimes, Andor W. Glaudemans, Adrienne H. Brouwers, Marjolijn N. Lub-de Hooge, Jourik A. Gietema, Carolina P. Schröder, Wim Timens, Mathilde Jalving, Sjoerd Elias, Sjoukje F. Oosting, Derk J. de Groot, Elisabeth G. de Vries. 89ZED88082A PET imaging to visualize CD8+ T cells in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB037.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) developed using the valine-citrulline-MMAE (vc-MMAE) platform, consist of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) covalently bound with a potent anti-mitotic toxin (MMAE) through a protease-labile vc linker. Recently, clinical data for a variety of vc-MMAE ADCs has become available. The goal of this analysis was to develop a platform model that simultaneously described antibody-conjugated MMAE (acMMAE) pharmacokinetic (PK) data from eight vc-MMAE ADCs, against different targets and tumor indications; and to assess differences and similarities of model parameters and model predictions, between different compounds. Clinical PK data of eight vc-MMAE ADCs from eight Phase I studies were pooled. A population PK platform model for the eight ADCs was developed, where the inter-compound variability (ICV) was described explicitly, using the third random effect level (ICV), and implemented using LEVEL option of NONMEM 7.3. The PK was described by a two-compartment model with time dependent clearance. Clearance and volume of distribution increased with body weight; volume was higher for males, and clearance mildly decreased with the nominal dose. Michaelis-Menten elimination had only minor effect on PK and was not included in the model. Time-dependence of clearance had no effect beyond the first dosing cycle. Clearance and central volume were similar among ADCs, with ICV of 15 and 5%, respectively. Thus, PK of acMMAE was largely comparable across different vc-MMAE ADCs. The model may be applied to predict PK-profiles of vc-MMAE ADCs under development, estimate individual exposure for the subsequent PK-pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis, and project optimal dose regimens and PK sampling times.

Introduction: New targets and treatment modalities are needed for multiple myeloma (MM). Fc receptor-homolog 5 (FcRH5) is a type I membrane protein that is expressed on B cells and plasma cells, and is found on myeloma cells with near 100% prevalence. BFCR4350A, a humanized immunoglobulin G-based T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody (bsAb), targets the most membrane-proximal domain of FcRH5 on myeloma cells and CD3 on T cells. Dual binding facilitates efficient immunological synapse formation, resulting in T-cell activation and potent killing of myeloma cells (Li et al. Cancer Cell 2017). GO39775 (NCT03275103) is an ongoing, multicenter Phase I trial evaluating the safety, activity, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of BFCR4350A monotherapy in pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM. We present dose-escalation data from the single step-up dosing cohort (Arm A). Methods: All pts have R/R MM for which no established therapy is available, appropriate, or tolerated. Prior exposure to CAR-T cells, T-cell engaging bsAbs, and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), including those targeting BCMA, is allowed. In dose-escalation, pts receive BFCR4350A by IV infusion in 21-day cycles (Q3W). In Arm A, a single step-up dose is used in Cycle (C) 1 to mitigate the risk for cytokine release syndrome (CRS), with the step dose (0.05-3.6mg) given on C1 Day (D) 1 and the target dose (0.15-132mg) given on C1D8, and on D1 of each subsequent cycle. Results: At cut-off (April 13, 2020), 51 pts (median age: 62.0 years [range: 33-80]; high-risk [HR] cytogenetics [1q21, t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17p)]: 28 pts) had been enrolled into Arm A. Median number of prior lines of therapy was 6 (range: 2-15). Prior treatments included: proteasome inhibitors (PIs), 100% (94.1% refractory); immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), 100% (98.0% refractory); anti-CD38 mAbs, 78.4% (92.5% refractory); autologous stem cell transplant, 86.3%. Overall, 66.7% of pts were triple-class refractory (≥1 PI, ≥1 IMiD, and ≥1 anti-CD38 mAb), and 94.1% of pts were refractory to their last therapy. At cut-off, 46/51 pts were evaluable for efficacy. Responses were observed at the 3.6/20mg dose level and above, in 15/29 pts (51.7%) (Table). Responses included 3 stringent CRs, 3 CRs, 4 VGPRs, and 5 PRs (Table). At the 3.6/20mg dose level and above, responses were observed in pts with HR cytogenetics (9/17), triple-class refractory disease (10/20), and prior exposure to anti-CD38 mAbs (11/22), CAR-Ts (2/3), or ADCs (2/2). Duration of response data are evolving, with 6/15 pts in response for >6 months at cut-off. Median follow-up for safety was 6.2 months (range: 0.2-26.3 months). Almost all pts (49/51) had ≥1 treatment-related AE. The most common treatment-related AE was CRS (Lee et al. 2014 criteria; 38/51 pts, 74.5%). CRS was Grade (Gr) 1 in 20 pts (39.2%), Gr 2 in 17 pts (33.3%), and Gr 3 in 1 pt (2%) (due to Gr 4 transaminase elevation). CRS was most common in C1 (38 pts) and was uncommon or absent in subsequent cycles (4 pts). Most CRS events (49/58, 84.5%) resolved within 2 days. 18/38 (47.3%) pts with CRS received tocilizumab and/or steroids. Other treatment-related AEs in ≥5 pts were neutropenia and lymphocyte count decreased (6 pts each, 11.8%), aspartate aminotransferase increased and platelet count decreased (5 pts each, 9.8%). Treatment-related Gr 3-4 AEs (20 pts, 39.2%) in ≥3 pts were lymphocyte count decreased (6 pts, 11.8%), neutropenia (5 pts, 9.8%), anemia and platelet count decreased (3 pts each, 5.9%). No treatment-related Gr 5 (fatal) AEs were observed. Treatment-related AEs leading to withdrawal of treatment were uncommon (1 pt, 2.0%). One DLT (Gr 3 pneumonia) was observed in the 3.6/90mg cohort, but the MTD was not reached. BFCR4350A PK was linear across the active dose levels tested and the estimated half-life was supportive of the Q3W dosing regimen. Conclusions: BFCR4350A monotherapy demonstrates promising activity in heavily pre-treated R/R MM, with deep and durable responses observed in pts with HR cytogenetics, triple-class refractory disease, and/or prior exposure to anti-CD38 mAbs, CAR-Ts, or ADCs. Toxicity was manageable, with C1 single step-up dosing effectively mitigating the risk for severe CRS and allowing escalation to clinically active doses. Updated data will be presented. Disclosures Cohen: Novartis: Other: Patents/Intellectual property licensed, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harrison:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: wrt panobinostat; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Haemalogix: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Krishnan:Sutro: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Z Predicta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Stock BMS, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy. Fonseca:Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Aduro: Consultancy; OncoTracker: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Forsberg:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Genentech, Inc., Sanofi, Karyopharm, Abbvie: Research Funding. Spencer:AbbVie, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, SecuraBio, Specialised Therapeutics Australia, Servier and Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Servier and Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, SecuraBio, Specialised Therapeutics Australia, Servier and Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene, Janssen and Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Berdeja:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glenmark: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Teva: Research Funding; Vivolux: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Cellularity: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; CURIS: Research Funding; Legend: Consultancy; Lilly: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; EMD Sorono: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bluebird: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kesios: Research Funding. Li:Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment. Choeurng:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vaze:Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Samineni:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sumiyoshi:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Cooper:Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fine:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Trudel:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: BFCR4350A is a humanized IgG-based T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody that targets the most membrane-proximal domain of FcRH5 on myeloma cells and CD3 on T cells. Dual binding facilitates efficient immunological synapse formation, resulting in T-cell activation and killing of myeloma cells. BFCR4350A is an investigational agent.

Introduction: Fc receptor-homolog 5 (FcRH5) is an immunoglobulin (Ig) domain-containing type I membrane protein that is expressed exclusively in the B-cell lineage. FcRH5 expression is retained in myeloma cells, with near 100% prevalence, and is elevated vs normal B cells. BFCR4350A is a humanized IgG-based T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody. Binding of BFCR4350A to the most membrane-proximal domain of FcRH5 on myeloma cells and to cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) on T cells results in efficient immunological synapse formation and potent T-cell-directed killing of myeloma cells (Li, et al. Cancer Cell 2017). An ongoing Phase I dose-escalation study (GO39775; NCT03275103) is investigating the safety, activity, pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics of BFCR4350A monotherapy in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM). In Arm A, clinical activity was observed at the 3.6mg/20mg (step/target) dose level and above, and toxicity was manageable (Cohen, et al. ASH 2020). We present preliminary biomarker data that demonstrate the mode of action (MOA) of BFCR4350A, provide support for Cycle (C) 1 step-up dosing, and offer preliminary insights into markers that may predict response. Methods: In Arm A, R/R MM pts receive BFCR4350A by intravenous infusion in 21-day cycles. In C1, a single step-up dosing approach is used to mitigate the risk for cytokine release syndrome (CRS), with the step dose given on C1 Day (D) 1 and the target dose given on C1D8. The target dose is then administered on D1 of each subsequent cycle. PD changes in peripheral blood (PB) are assessed at baseline and at multiple time points within C1 by whole blood flow cytometry, plasma cytokine electrochemiluminescence and digital ELISA. Tumor biomarkers are assessed at baseline and pre-C2 by bone marrow (BM) biopsy dual CD138/CD8 immunohistochemistry staining and BM aspirate flow cytometry. The clinical cut-off date used for the current analyses was April 13, 2020. Results: At cut-off, all pts in Arm A (n=51) were biomarker evaluable. FcRH5 expression on myeloma cells was detected in all pts. Dose-dependent PD changes in PB were observed 24-192 hrs after the C1D1 infusion. Variable reduction in circulating T cells was observed 24 hrs after the 0.3-1.8mg C1D1 doses, while consistent reduction was observed after the 3.6mg C1D1 dose, with recovery by C1D8 (192 hrs). T-cell activation was detected 24 hrs post-infusion by upregulation of CD69 in CD8 and CD4 T cells and elevation of IFN-γ in plasma (median increase of ~150-fold from baseline), while T-cell proliferation (Ki67+) peaked by C1D8. At the 3.6mg C1D1 dose, CD8 T-cell activation and proliferation were up to 20-fold higher than at baseline. Minimal elevation of IL-6 was observed post-infusion in pts who received doses below 3.6mg on C1D1, while more consistent increases (≥100pg/ml) were observed in pts who received 3.6mg. IL-6 levels peaked within 24 hrs of the C1D1 dose and the kinetics of IL-6 increase were associated with dose and risk for CRS. Step-up dosing mitigated the risk for severe CRS, as evidenced by lower IL-6 levels after the C1D8 target dose compared to the 3.6mg C1D1 step dose in 27/33 (82%) pts (see Cohen, et al. ASH 2020 for corresponding clinical data). Preliminary data suggest that pts who respond to BFCR4350A have more pronounced T-cell expansion in PB, irrespective of baseline CD8 T-cell levels during the first week of C1. Analysis of the subset of pts with paired BM biopsies (n=19 pts) revealed that levels of CD8+ tumor infiltrating T-cells (TILs) were higher in responding pts than in non-responding pts at the end of C1. Conclusions: In this study, we demonstrated that early PD changes in T-cell activation, proliferation, and cytokine production confirm the MOA of BFCR4350A and support C1 step-up dosing for CRS mitigation in R/R MM. Early data suggest that at the end of C1, higher peripheral CD8 T-cell expansion and TILs are observed in responding pts than in non-responding pts. Additional analyses are ongoing to establish BFCR4350A response predictors and to better characterize the populations that are likely to benefit. Updated data will be presented. Disclosures Nakamura: Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lear:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment. Wilson:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment. Koeppen:Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Pliant Therapeutics, Allogene, Jounce: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vaze:Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Trudel:Takeda: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Spencer:Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Servier and Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, SecuraBio, Specialised Therapeutics Australia, Servier and Takeda: Honoraria; AbbVie, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, SecuraBio, Specialised Therapeutics Australia, Servier and Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene, Janssen and Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Harrison:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: wrt panobinostat; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Haemalogix: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cohen:Novartis: Other: Patents/Intellectual property licensed, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fine:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Li:Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment. Cooper:Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Sumiyoshi:Genentech, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. OffLabel Disclosure: BFCR4350A is a humanized IgG-based T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody that targets the most membrane-proximal domain of FcRH5 on myeloma cells and CD3 on T cells. Dual binding facilitates efficient immunological synapse formation, resulting in T-cell activation and killing of myeloma cells. BFCR4350A is an investigational agent.

PURPOSE Six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate 1 (STEAP1) is highly expressed in prostate cancers. DSTP3086S is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 anti-STEAP1 monoclonal antibody linked to the potent antimitotic agent monomethyl auristatin E. This study evaluated the safety and activity of DSTP3086S in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHODS Patients were enrolled in a 3 + 3 dose escalation study to evaluate DSTP3086S (0.3 to 2.8 mg/kg intravenously) given once every 3 weeks followed by cohort expansion at the recommended phase II dose or weekly (0.8 to 1.0 mg/kg). RESULTS Seventy-seven patients were given DSTP3086S once every 3 weeks, and seven were treated weekly. Two patients in the once-every-3-weeks dose escalation had dose-limiting grade 3 transaminitis. Grade 3 hyperglycemia and grade 4 hypophosphatemia were dose-limiting toxicities in one patient treated at 1.0 mg/kg weekly. Initial cohort expansion evaluated dosing at 2.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (n = 10), but frequent dose reductions led to testing of 2.4 mg/kg (n = 39) in the expansion phase. Common related adverse events (> 20%) across doses (once every 3 weeks) were fatigue, peripheral neuropathy, nausea, constipation, anorexia, diarrhea, and vomiting. DSTP3086S pharmacokinetics were linear. Among 62 patients who received > 2 mg/kg DSTP3086S once every 3 weeks, 11 (18%) demonstrated a ≥ 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen; two (6%) of 36 with measurable disease at baseline achieved a radiographic partial response; and of 27 patients with informative unfavorable baseline circulating tumor cells ≥ 5/7.5 mL of blood, 16 (59%) showed conversions to favorable circulating tumor cells < 5. No prostate-specific antigen or RECIST responses were seen with weekly dosing. CONCLUSION DSTP3086S has acceptable safety at the recommended phase II dose level of 2.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. Antitumor activity at doses between 2.25 and 2.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks supports the potential benefit of treating STEAP1-expressing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with an STEAP1-targeting antibody-drug conjugate.

Six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of prostate-1 (STEAP1) is a newly identified target in prostate cancer. The use of radiolabeled STEAP1-targeting antibodies with positron emission tomography (PET) may allow for detection of sites of metastatic prostate cancer and may refine patient selection for antigen-directed therapies. This was a prospective study in seven patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had at least one archival biopsy that was STEAP1-positive by immunohistochemistry. Patients received intravenous injections of ~185 MBq and 10 mg of [(89)Zr]Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A, a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against STEAP1. PET/CT images, blood samples, and whole-body counts were monitored longitudinally in six patients. Here we report on safety, biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, dose estimates to normal tissues, and initial tumor targeting for this group of patients. There was no significant acute or sub-acute toxicity. Favorable biodistribution and enhanced lesion uptake (in both bone and soft tissue) was observed on imaging using a mass of 10 mg of DFO-MSTP2109A. The best lesion discrimination was seen at the latest imaging time, a median of six days post-administration. Pharmacokinetics showed a median serum T (1/2) Beta of 198 h, volume of central compartment of 3.54 L (similar to plasma volume), and clearance of 19.7 mL/h. The median biologic T ½ for whole-body retention was 469 h. The highest mean absorbed doses to normal organs (mGy/MBq) were 1.18, 1.11, 0.78, 0.73, and 0.71 for liver, heart wall, lung, kidney, and spleen, respectively. Excellent targeting of metastatic prostate sites in both bone and soft tissue was observed, with an optimal imaging time of six days post-administration. The liver and heart were the normal organs that experienced the highest absorbed doses. The pharmacokinetics were similar to other antibodies without major cross-reactivity with normal tissues. A more detailed analysis of lesion targeting in a larger patient population with correlation to immunohistology and standard imaging modalities has been reported.

Antibody drug conjugates (ADC) consist of potent cytotoxic drugs conjugated to antibodies via chemical linkers, which enables specific targeting of tumor cells while reducing systemic exposure to the cytotoxic drug and improving the therapeutic window. The valine citrulline monomethyl auristatin E (vcMMAE, conventional linker-drug) ADC platform has shown promising clinical activity in several cancers, but peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a frequent adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation and dose reduction. This was not predicted based on nonclinical toxicology studies in monkeys or rats treated with vcMMAE ADCs. We evaluated four hypotheses for the lack of translatability of PN with vcMMAE ADCs: 1) species differences in exposure; 2) insensitivity of animal models; 3) species differences in target biology and other vcMMAE ADC properties in peripheral nerves and 4) increased susceptibility of patient population. The result of this hypothesis-based approach identified opportunities to improve the predictivity of PN in our animal models by increasing duration of exposure and adding an expanded neurohistopathology assessment of peripheral nerves. The utility of a predictive animal model would be to provide possible mitigation strategies in the clinic with vcMMAE ADCs and help to screen the next generation microtubule inhibitor (MTI) ADCs for reduced PN.

Purpose: Elevated levels or increases in circulating tumor cells (CTC) portend poor prognosis in patients with epithelial cancers. Less is known about CTCs as surrogate endpoints or their use for predictive biomarker evaluation. This study investigated the utility of CTC enumeration and characterization using the CellSearch platform, as well as mutation detection in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), in patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Experimental Design: Forty-one patients were enrolled in a single-arm phase II clinical trial of erlotinib and pertuzumab. Peripheral blood was analyzed for CTC enumeration, EGFR expression in CTCs, and detection of oncogenic mutations in CTCs and ctDNA. Changes in CTC levels were correlated with 2[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose–positron emission tomographic (FDG-PET) and computed tomographic (CT) imaging and survival endpoints. Results: CTCs were detected (≥1 CTC) at baseline in 78% of patients. Greater sensitivity for mutation detection was observed in ctDNA than in CTCs and detected mutations were strongly concordant with mutation status in matched tumor. Higher baseline CTC counts were associated with response to treatment by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, P = 0.009) and decreased CTC counts upon treatment were associated with FDG-PET and RECIST response (P = 0.014 and P = 0.019) and longer progression-free survival (P = 0.050). Conclusion: These data provide evidence of a correlation between decreases in CTC counts and radiographic response by either FDG-PET or RECIST in patients with advanced NSCLC. These findings require prospective validation but suggest a potential role for using CTC decreases as an early indication of response to therapy and ctDNA for real-time assessment of mutation status from blood. Clin Cancer Res; 18(8); 2391–401. ©2012 AACR.

The decision to incorporate the specific evaluation of a candidate companion diagnostic (CDx) in a clinical development plan (CDP) is often difficult and is exacerbated by the lack of relevant decision tools. In this article, we discuss a novel method to assess the probability of technical success (PTS) of a CDP that adequately evaluates a CDx compared with a CDP that doesn’t. We propose splitting the PTS into subjective (biological uncertainty) and quantitative (clinical uncertainty) components, assessing each separately, and then combining them in a decision theoretical manner to obtain an overall success probability of a CDP with and without a CDx.

Purpose: Assessing clinical activity of molecularly targeted anticancer agents, especially in the absence of tumor shrinkage, is challenging. To evaluate on-treatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and/or 18F-fluorodeoxythymidine (FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) for this purpose, we conducted a prospective multicenter trial assessing PET response rates and associations with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 2nd/3rd-line non–small-cell lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib. Experimental Design: PET/computed tomography (CT) scans were conducted at baseline, day (d)14 and d56 after the first daily erlotinib dose, with diagnostic CT at baseline and d56 (all scans centrally reviewed). PET partial metabolic response (PMR) was defined as a mean decrease (in ≤5 lesions/patient) of 15% or more maximum standardized uptake value. PFS was investigator-determined. Results: Of 74 erlotinib-treated patients, 51 completed all imaging assessments through d56; 13 of 51 (26%) FDG-evaluable patients had PMR at d14, as did 9 of 50 (18%) FLT-evaluable patients. Four (7.8%) showed partial responses (PR) by d56 CT; all 4 had PMR by d14 FDG-PET with 3 PMRs by d14 FLT-PET. Three of the 4 patients with CT PR had evaluable archival tumor tissue; all 3 had epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. D14 and d56 PMRs by FDG or FLT were associated with improved PFS; HRs for PET responders versus nonresponders were 0.3 to 0.4. D14 FDG-PET PMR was associated with improved OS (P = 0.03) compared with FDG-PET nonresponders. Conclusion: Early (d14) FDG-PET PMR is associated with improved PFS and OS, even in the absence of subsequent Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response. These data support inclusion of FDG-PET imaging in clinical trials testing novel targeted therapies, particularly those with anticipated cytostatic effects. Clin Cancer Res; 17(10); 3304–15. ©2011 AACR.

Treatment resistance, as indicated by the presence of high levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction therapy and induction consolidation, is associated with a poor prognosis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We hypothesized that treatment resistance is an intrinsic feature of ALL cells reflected in the gene expression pattern and that resistance to chemotherapy can be predicted before treatment. To test these hypotheses, gene expression signatures of ALL samples with high MRD load were compared with those of samples without measurable MRD during treatment. We identified 54 genes that clearly distinguished resistant from sensitive ALL samples. Genes with low expression in resistant samples were predominantly associated with cell-cycle progression and apoptosis, suggesting that impaired cell proliferation and apoptosis are involved in treatment resistance. Prediction analysis using randomly selected samples as a training set and the remaining samples as a test set revealed an accuracy of 84%. We conclude that resistance to chemotherapy seems at least in part to be an intrinsic feature of ALL cells. Because treatment response could be predicted with high accuracy, gene expression profiling could become a clinically relevant tool for treatment stratification in the early course of childhood ALL.

To investigate the effect of l-asparaginase on acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), we used cDNA microarrays to obtain a genome-wide view of gene expression both at baseline and after in vitro exposure to l-asparaginase in cell lines and pediatric ALL samples. In 16 cell lines, a baseline gene expression pattern distinguished l-asparaginase sensitivity from resistance. However, for 28 pediatric ALL samples, no consistent baseline expression pattern was associated with sensitivity to l-asparaginase. In particular, baseline expression of asparagine synthetase (ASNS) was not predictive of response to l-asparaginase. After exposure to l-asparaginase, 5 cell lines and 10 clinical samples exhibited very similar changes in the expression of a large number of genes. However, the gene expression changes occurred more slowly in the clinical samples. These changes included a consistent increase in expression of tRNA synthetases and solute transporters and activating transcription factor and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein family members, a response similar to that observed with amino acid starvation. There was also a consistent decrease in many genes associated with proliferation. Taken together, the changes seem to reflect a consistent coordinated response to asparagine starvation in both cell lines and clinical samples. Importantly, in the clinical samples, increased expression of ASNS after l-asparaginase exposure was not associated with in vitro resistance to l-asparaginase, indicating that ASNS-independent mechanisms of in vitro l-asparaginase resistance are common in ALL. These results suggest that targeting particular genes involved in the response to amino acid starvation in ALL cells may provide a novel way to overcome l-asparaginase resistance.

We obtained a global view of gene expression in both cell lines and pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) samples that harbor one of several selected chromosomal abnormalities. When the cell lines were studied alone, we found that these chromosomal abnormalities were associated with the predominant variation in transcriptional programs across the set of cell lines studied. When cell lines and clinical samples were studied together, we found that each chromosomal abnormality (TEL/AML1, BCR/ABL, or MLL abnormalities) was associated with a characteristic gene expression signature that was shared by both cell lines and clinical samples. However, BCR/ABL was associated with a much more heterogeneous pattern of expression than were TEL/AML1 and MLL abnormalities. This observation has important implications for the study of BCR/ABL ALL. In addition, we systematically identified genes whose expression was associated with TEL/AML1, BCR/ABL, or MLL abnormalities in both clinical samples and cell lines. Although some of these genes have previously been described, many have not previously been reported to be associated with one of these chromosomal abnormalities. Notably, we found that the erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) is consistently highly expressed in TEL/AML1 ALL compared with BCR/ABL or MLL. (Blood. 2004;103:1043-1049)

Background: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has been associated with response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition, but responses are also seen in patients with PD-L1 negative tumors when assessed immunohistochemically (IHC) with various antibodies. To help understand these findings, we performed a first-in-human positron emission tomography (PET) imaging study with the anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab labeled with zirconium-89 (89Zr) prior to treatment with atezolizumab to assess normal organ distribution and evaluate tumor tracer uptake in relation to PD-L1 IHC in archival and post-tracer tumor specimen and ultimately to treatment response. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), bladder cancer (BC) or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) received 10 mg unlabeled atezolizumab plus 37 MBq 89Zr-atezolizumab (~1 mg) followed by up to 4 PET scans (1 hour, days 2, 4 and 7 post-injection (pi)). Next, after obtaining a tumor biopsy for PD-L1 IHC 8-10 days after tracer injection, patients received atezolizumab (1200 mg) i.v. once every 3 weeks until disease progression (NCT02453984 and NCT02478099). Response was assessed every 6 weeks with RECIST1.1. Normal organ tracer uptake was calculated as percentage of the injected dose/kg (%ID/kg) 4 and 7 days pi, tumor tracer uptake as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and %ID/kg 7 days pi. Tumor biopsy PD-L1 expression was assessed in tumor cells (TC) and tumor infiltrating immune cells (IC) by HistoGeneX IHC with the SP142 assay (Ventana). Results: In this ongoing trial, 16/25 patients completed the PET series and received atezolizumab at least until the first response assessment. The median follow-up of these patients is 16 weeks (6-40+, NSCLC=6, BC=8, TNBC=2). The highest normal organ 89Zr-atezolizumab uptake was seen in the spleen (16.3±3.6 %ID/kg 4 days and 17.9±3.6 %ID/kg 7 days pi), and uptake in other lymphatic organs (single normal lymph nodes and tonsil) and sites of (chronic) inflammation (e.g. chronic sinusitis and bursitis) were detected. Uptake in liver, kidney and intestine was similar to other antibodies with 7.3±1.6, 5.5±2.0 and 4.7±2.4 %ID/kg, respectively, 7 days pi. Tumor SUVmax ranged between 1.6 and 46.0 (1.8-12.4 %ID/kg), with an up to 9-fold difference within patients, and 4-fold difference between patients. In 4 biopsied lesions with IC/TC 0, 89Zr-atezolizumab uptake calculated as SUVmax was 10.0±3.6 (7.1±1.6 %ID/kg). At this time only 4 biopsies had a IHC score of 2+ on either IC or TC, and there were no biopsies with a score of 3+, limiting the ability to determine correlation of PD-L1 IHC to imaging data. Conclusion: 89Zr-atezolizumab imaging showed high uptake in normal spleen, other normal lymphoid organs and regions of inflammation. Uptake in tumor lesions was heterogeneous within and between patients and even PD-L1 IHC 0 tumors showed clear tracer uptake. Citation Format: Frederike Bensch, Elly van der Veen, Annelies Jorritsma, Marjolijn Lub-de Hooge, Ronald Boellaard, Sjoukje Oosting, Carolien Schröder, Jeroen Hiltermann, Anthonie van der Wekken, Harry Groen, Bernard Fine, Nathan McKnight, Sandra Sanabria Bohorquez, Simon Williams, Luisa Veronese, Christoph Mancao, Adrienne H. Brouwers, Elisabeth de Vries. First-in-human PET imaging with the PD-L1 antibody 89Zr-atezolizumab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT017. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT017

Author Summary Background. Combination blockade of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family signaling may confer enhanced antitumor activity than single-agent blockade. We performed a single-arm study of pertuzumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits HER2 dimerization, and erlotinib in relapsed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods. Patients received pertuzumab (840-mg loading dose and 420-mg maintenance intravenously every 3 weeks) and erlotinib (150-mg or 100-mg dose orally, daily). The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) at day 56 in all patients and those with EGFR wild-type tumors. Results. Of 41 patients, 28 (68.3%) experienced treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events, including pneumatosis intestinalis (3 patients), resulting in early cessation of enrollment. Tissue samples from 32 patients showed mutated EGFR status in 9 of 41 (22%) and wild-type EGFR in 23 of 41 (56%). The FDG-PET RR for patients with assessments at day 56 was 19.5% in all patients (n = 41) and 8.7% in patients with wild-type EGFR NSCLC (n = 23). Investigator-assessed computed tomography RR at day 56 was 12.2%. Conclusion. FDG-PET suggests that pertuzumab plus erlotinib is an active combination, but combination therapy was poorly tolerated, which limits its clinical applicability. More research is warranted to identify drug combinations that disrupt HER receptor signaling but that exhibit improved tolerability profiles.

We report our measurement of the time average and the temporal autocorrelation function of the intensity of light scattered by the highly monomeric globular protein, bovine γII‐crystallin, in aqueous solution as a function of wave number q, protein volume fraction φ, and temperature T. The time average intensity data is used to obtain the q→0 limit of the static structure factor S(φ,T), as a function of φ and T. We show that S(φ,T) may be well characterized by modeling the proteins as interacting through the Baxter adhesive hard sphere pair interaction potential. The temporal autocorrelation function data is used to determine the collective diffusion coefficient D(φ,T) of the proteins as a function of φ and T. We then obtain the experimental hydrodynamic factor H(φ,T)≡S(φ,T)[D(φ,T)/D0(T)], where D0(T) is the diffusion coefficient of the individual proteins in the φ→0 limit. We find that H exhibits a different φ‐dependence at low (φ≤0.016) and high (φ≳0.02) protein volume fractions. In the low φ domain...

Aqueous solutions of the bovine eye lens protein gamma II (or gamma B)-crystallin at neutral pH show a gradual increase in phase separation temperature, Tph, when allowed to stand for several weeks at room temperature without reducing agents. In a typical experiment, the Tph of the protein solution (218 mg/ml) increases from 2.5 +/- 1 degree C to 32.5 +/- 1 degree C after 21 days, and a new protein species, gamma IIH, is formed. The Tph of pure gamma IIH is at least 40 degrees C higher than that of pure gamma II. The average apparent hydrodynamic radius is 36 A for gamma IIH compared to 26 A for gamma II. The molecular mass of gamma IIH is approximately 41.5 kDa compared to 20 kDa for native gamma II. Therefore, gamma IIH is probably a dimer of gamma II crystallin. gamma IIH has a lower thiol content than gamma II and is not formed in the presence of dithiothreitol. We conclude that gamma IIH is a thiol oxidation product of gamma II-crystallin and is a dimer containing an intermolecular disulfide crosslink. Thus, some oxidative modifications of protein thiol groups lead to an increase in net attractive interactions between proteins. As a result, Tph increases and protein aggregates are formed. These two microscopic changes produce the increased light scattering associated with lens opacification.

An aqueous protein solution is a binary mixture of large particles (protein molecules) and small particles (water molecules). In contrast, a binary liquid mixture is a mixture of two different kinds of particles that are approximately the same size. Thus, a comparison of the critical behavior in these two systems allows one to determine the effect on critical behavior of a relative difference of size in the two kinds of particles in a binary mixture. The correlation length j, osmotic compressibility kT , and coexistence curve of aqueous protein solutions in the vicinity of the critical point for liquid-liquid phase separation have been reported recently [1‐3]. These experimental results established that the static critical properties of these solutions are consistent with the behavior of members of the static universality class of three-dimensional systems with short range interactions and scalar order parameters. This universality class includes binary liquid mixtures. In contrast to the equilibrium properties, the dynamic properties of aqueous protein solutions in the vicinity of the critical point have not been investigated as thoroughly. In this Letter, we report our use of quasielastic light scattering (QLS) to investigate the time decay of spontaneous concentration fluctuations, as a function of both wave number q of the fluctuations and temperature T, along the critical isochore of aqueous solutions of the bovine eye lens protein gII-crystallin. The only previous study of critical dynamics in a protein solution of which we are aware is the work of Ishimoto and Tanaka who made QLS measurements at a single fixed wave number of the fluctuations using a 19 channel digital correlator on aqueous solutions of lysozyme [4] along the critical isochore for sT 2 TcdyTc $ 5 3 10 23 (q j, 0.1), where Tc is the critical temperature. The present study is a significant experimental advance over the work of Ishimoto and Tanaka in that (i) we obtain data for fluctuations at up to 12 different wave numbers, (ii) we obtain data using a 144 channel digital correlator, and (iii) we obtain data much closer to the critical point [ sT 2 TcdyTc $ 1.56 3 10 24 and q j# 3.18]. The more thorough investigation of critical dynamics presented here has revealed new and unexpected behavior. Specifically, we find that the wave number and temperature dependence of the average rate of decay of the concentration fluctuations are consistent with the theory for critical dynamics in binary liquid mixtures [5] only if we allow both the background viscosity and the background contribution to the decay rate to be unusually large. Furthermore, in contrast to the behavior seen in binary liquid mixtures we find that the concentration fluctuations exhibit very significant deviation from exponential decay with time. Of course, these protein solutions may be viewed as

Background Evaluation of cancer biomarkers from blood could significantly enable biomarker assessment by providing a relatively non-invasive source of representative tumor material. Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) isolated from blood of metastatic cancer patients hold significant promise in this regard. Methodology/Principal Findings Using spiked tumor-cells we evaluated CTC capture on different CTC technology platforms, including CellSearch® and two biochip platforms, and used the isolated CTCs to develop and optimize assays for molecular characterization of CTCs. We report similar performance for the various platforms tested in capturing CTCs, and find that capture efficiency is dependent on the level of EpCAM expression. We demonstrate that captured CTCs are amenable to biomarker analyses such as HER2 status, qRT-PCR for breast cancer subtype markers, KRAS mutation detection, and EGFR staining by immunofluorescence (IF). We quantify cell surface expression of EGFR in metastatic lung cancer patient samples. In addition, we determined HER2 status by IF and FISH in CTCs from metastatic breast cancer patients. In the majority of patients (89%) we found concordance with HER2 status from patient tumor tissue, though in a subset of patients (11%), HER2 status in CTCs differed from that observed in the primary tumor. Surprisingly, we found CTC counts to be higher in ER+ patients in comparison to HER2+ and triple negative patients, which could be explained by low EpCAM expression and a more mesenchymal phenotype of tumors belonging to the basal-like molecular subtype of breast cancer. Conclusions/Significance Our data suggests that molecular characterization from captured CTCs is possible and can potentially provide real-time information on biomarker status. In this regard, CTCs hold significant promise as a source of tumor material to facilitate clinical biomarker evaluation. However, limitations exist from a purely EpCAM based capture system and addition of antibodies to mesenchymal markers could further improve CTC capture efficiency to enable routine biomarker analysis from CTCs.

The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are widely used but have recognized limitations. Molecular imaging assessments, including changes in (18)F-deoxyglucose (FDG) or (18)F-deoxythymidine (FLT) uptake by positron emission tomography (PET), may provide earlier, more robust evaluation of treatment efficacy.A prospective trial evaluated on-treatment changes in FDG and FLT PET imaging among patients with relapsed or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib to assess the relationship between PET-evaluated response and clinical outcomes. We describe an audit of compliance with the study imaging charter, to establish the feasibility of achieving methodological consistency in a multicentre setting.Patients underwent PET scans at baseline and approximately day 14 and day 56 of treatment (n = 73, 66 and 51 studies, and n = 73, 63 and 50 studies for FDG PET and FLT PET, respectively). Blood glucose levels were within the target range for all FDG PET scans. Charter-specified uptake times were achieved in 86% (63/73) and 89% (65/73) of baseline FDG and FLT scans, respectively. On-treatment scans were less consistent: 72% (84/117) and 68% (77/113), respectively, achieved the target of ±5 min of baseline uptake time. However, 96% (112/117) and 94% (106/113) of FDG and FLT PET studies, respectively, were within ±15 min. Bland-Altman analysis of intra-individual hepatic average standardized uptake value (SUV(ave)), to assess reproducibility, showed only a small difference in physiological uptake (-0.006 ± 0.224 in 118 follow-up FDG scans and 0.09 ± 0.81 in 111 follow-up FLT scans).It is possible to achieve high reproducibility of scan acquisition methodology, provided that strict imaging compliance guidelines are mandated in the study protocol.

ADCs hold promise for enhancing the therapeutic index of cytotoxics. STEAP1 is overexpressed in mCRPC and is the target of an ADC currently under clinical development. To identify pts most likely to benefit from the ADC, we explored STEAP1 expression as a predictive biomarker in tumor tissue using a CLIA-certified IHC assay, and on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in blood using the CellSearch and EPIC platforms. Sixty pts with progressive mCRPC received doses ranging from 0.3 to 2.8 mg/kg once every three weeks. Response was defined as a ≥50% decline in PSA from baseline, and time on study for >6 months was consistent with continued clinical benefit. At doses of ≥2 mg/kg, the response rate (RR) was 10/45 (22%, 95% CI 9.9-34.1) and was highest in the STEAP1 IHC 3+ group, as was the fraction of patients who remained on study for >6 months. At ≥2 mg/kg, 20/45 pts (44%, 95% CI 29.5-58.5) had unfavorable CTC counts of ≥5/7.5mL at baseline and were considered evaluable. After treatment, conversions from unfavorable to favorable CTC counts of STEAP1 IHC Score and Treatment ResponseSTEAP1 IHC ScorePts Observed/TotalPSA decline by ≥50% from baseline>6 months on treatment(%, 95% CI)(%, 95% CI)(%, 95% CI)1+5/45 (11%, 1.9-20.1)1/5 (20%, -15.1-55.1)0/5 (0%)2+27/454/276/27(60%, 45.7-74.3)(15%, 1.5-28.5)(22%, 6.4-37.6)3+13/455/136/13(29%, 15.7-42.2)(39%, 12.5-65.5)(46%, 18.9-73.1)CTC Analysis and Treatment ResponseCTC endpointTime Point & CTC Conversion vs. baselinePts Observed/TotalPSA decline by ≥50% from baseline>6 months on treatment(%, 95% CI)(%, 95% CI)(%, 95% CI)CTC countsBaseline ≥5/7.5mL20/456/206/20(at ≥2 mg/kg)(44%, 29.5-58.5)(30%, 9.9-50.1)(30%, 9.9-50.1)Baseline An immuno-fluorescence-based assay developed to measure STEAP1 expression levels on CTCs showed readily detectable signal in 18/42 samples (43%, 95% CI 28-58), with a range from 1-56% of STEAP1-positive CTCs per case. After treatment, a decrease in the fraction of patients with STEAP1-positive and an increase in the STEAP1-negative CTCs was observed compared to baseline (see Table). We are prospectively selecting pts with STEAP1 IHC 2+/3+ tumors and assessing STEAP1 levels on CTCs in an ongoing Ph1 expansion study with the goal of developing a companion diagnostic to enrich for mCRPC pts most likely to benefit from treatment with the STEAP1 ADC. Citation Format: Daniel C. Danila, Howard I. Scher, Edith Szafer-Glusman, Amrita Herkal, Rebecca Suttmann, Martin Fleisher, Nicole A. Schreiber, Kristen Curtis, Houston Gilbert, Daniel Maslyar, Bernard Fine, Ron Firestein, Michael Mamounas, Mark R. Lackner, Omar Kabbarah. Predictive biomarkers of tumor sensitivity to STEAP1 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4310. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4310

5029 Background: STEAP1 is overexpressed in mCRPC and is an ADC target. STEAP1 expression in tissue assayed by IHC, protein and mRNA expression levels in circulating tumor cells (CTC) and by 89Zr-l...

Introduction: STEAP1 (Six Transmembrane Epithelial Antigen of Prostate 1) is a cell-surface therapeutic target overexpressed in 85% of prostate cancers. Zr-89 MSTP2109A, a humanized antibody targeting STEAP1 conjugated with desferrioxamine and radiolabeled with positron emitter Zr-89 (T1/2 78 h) was developed to enable imaging of STEAP1 expressing tumors. Methods: To evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), biodistribution and tumor uptake a prospective Phase I/II PET imaging study in mCRPC patients is ongoing. Patients with STEAP1 positive immunohistochemistry (IHC) in archival tissue were studied following 5.0 + 0.2 mCi IV injection of Zr-89 MSTP2109A (immunoreactivity 96 + 2%) . PET/CT images were compared with contemporaneous bone, CT and when available FDG scan findings on a lesional basis. Results: 15 patients have been studied. Two drug related adverse events included mild rigors and/or chills. The first 6 patients were imaged at four timepoints over a 7 day period and showed that PET imaging tumor uptake increased over time and was optimal at 6d (range 5-9). Based on this, all subsequent patients were imaged on day 6. Median PK showed: Plasma concentration at zero time (Co) 28.2%ID/L; T1/2 beta 197.8h; volume of distribution 3.543L; clearance 19.7 ml/h. All patients had definite Zr-89 MSTP2109A uptake in multiple sites of known disease (bone scan or CT standard-of-reference). All patients had bone and 7 had soft tissue metastases on Zr-89 MSTP2109A. In 10 patients, the Zr-89 MSTP2109A and bone scans detected a similar number of lesions; in 5 patients, the bone scan detected many more lesions. This discordance may represent treated non viable disease, as contemporaneous FDG PET scans tended to concur with the Zr-89 MSTP2109A scans rather than bone scans. In 4 of 7 pts Zr-89 MSTP2109A detected more soft tissue lesions than CT. The mean maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) in bone and soft tissue metastasis were 22.5 + 13.5 (range 4.4 to 59.3) and 16.4 + 5.6 (range 9.0 to 24.0) respectively. Correlation of tumor SUVmax and IHC is in progress. 11 of 15 patients underwent 11 biopsies within 30d of study (mean 18 + 9d), 7 were performed in PET positive sites after Zr-89 MSTP2109A imaging, 4 were performed prior to PET imaging; tumor was present in 10 of the 11 biopsies and they were all Zr-89 MSTP2109A positive. Conclusion: Zr-89 MSTP2109A is well tolerated. It shows high and progressively increasing tumor contrast in patients with mCRPC. All sites biopsied (11/11) had increased Zr-89 MSTP2109A uptake, only one biopsy was negative for tumor. Given its excellent tumor uptake additional studies to further characterize Zr-89 MSTP2109A may be pursued, for example, selecting patients for STEAP1 directed therapies, assessing treatment response to STEAP1 directed therapy, or as an early biomarker for metastatic disease. Citation Format: Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Daniel C. Danila, Volkan Beylergil, Joseph A. O'Donoghue, Sarah M. Cheal, Shutian Ruan, Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Josef J. Fox, Stephen E. Fleming, Pat B. Zanzonico, Govind Ragupathi, Serge K. Lyashchenko, Simon P. William, Steven M. Larson, Howard I. Scher, Bernard M. Fine, Michael J. Morris. Initial PET imaging and pharmacokinetic results from a Phase I/II study of Zr-89-labeled anti-STEAP1 antibody in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2069. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2069

Aim: The tumor antigen MSLN is frequently overexpressed in PC and OC. A 89Zr-PET study (NCT01832116) with MMOT0530A, an anti-MSLN antibody, was initiated in conjunction with a phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate DMOT4039A (containing MMOT0530A linked to the anti-mitotic agent MMAE, NCT01469793). This imaging study aims to investigate antibody tumor uptake, whole body distribution and organ pharmacokinetics and to explore the relation between uptake and MSLN expression and response to DMOT40392A treatment in patients with unresectable PC or platinum-resistant OC. Methods: Before receiving DMOT4039A, patients were injected with 37 MBq 89Zr-MMOT0530A +/- additional unlabeled MMOT0530A, followed by PET/CT imaging 2, 4 and 7 days post injection (pi). Tracer uptake was quantified with standardized uptake value (SUV) and expressed as mean (±SD). MSLN expression was determined in archival tumor tissue with an exploratory immunohistochemical (IHC) assay. Results: 7 PC and 4 OC patients were included. MSLN expression varied from 0 to 3+. The optimal antibody protein dose resulting in sufficient circulating tracer was 10 mg MMOT0530A and the optimal imaging time was 4 or 7 days pi. Tumor tracer uptake was observed in 37 quantifiable tumor lesions (all patients) with mean SUV of 10.7 (±6.3) on PET 4 days pi. The mean SUV per patient (1-8 lesions/patient) was 10.9 (±5.7), with 9.2 (±4.5) in PC and 11.9 (±7.4) in OC lesions on PET 4 days pi. Within patients, a mean 2.4-fold (±1.10) difference in tumor uptake between lesions was found. Two measurable lesions on diagnostic CT (according to RECIST 1.1) were not visible on PET. Uptake in blood, liver, kidneys, spleen and intestine reflected normal antibody distribution with mean SUV at day 4 pi of 5.6, 7.8, 6.1, 4.1 and 3.2, respectively, while low uptake was observed in muscle, lung, brain and bone (0.6, 1.0, 0.2 and 0.7, respectively). Tracer tumor uptake was lower in the 2 patients with IHC scores 0 and 1. Best response on DMOT4039A was stable disease in ten patients. An association between iPET tumor uptake and clinical response could not be determined. Conclusions: 89Zr-MMOT0530A-PET shows antibody uptake in primary and metastatic PC and OC tumor lesions. This technique can potentially guide antibody-based therapy development.

5020 Background: Six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate-1 (STEAP1) protein is a cell-surface antigen overexpressed in human epithelial prostate cancers. The ADC DSTP3086S contains the humanized IgG1 anti-STEAP1 monoclonal antibody linked to the potent anti-mitotic agent MMAE. Methods: This study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic activity of intravenous DSTP3086S (0.3-2.8 mg/kg) given every 3 weeks (q3w) to pts with CRPC. A traditional 3+3 design was used to determine maximum-tolerated dose, followed by cohort expansion at the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D). Clinical activity was evaluated per PCWG criteria. Dose escalation results are presented. Results: Twenty-eight pts were enrolled with a median age of 67 (43-76), all ECOG PS 0-1, and with a median of 7 prior systemic regimens (including a median of 4 hormonal and 3 non-hormonal regimens). Pts received a median of 3 doses (range 1-10) of DSTP3086S. Reversible Grade 3 transaminitis DLTs occurred in one pt each in the 2.25 mg/kg and 2.8 mg/kg cohorts. Serious AEs (SAE) related to study drug (3 total) included one DVT (Grade 3) in the 1.5 mg/kg cohort, as well as one GI hemorrhage (Grade 3) and one sepsis event (Grade 5) in the 2.25 mg/kg cohort. The most common related AEs across all doses were fatigue (36%), nausea (32%), constipation (25%), decreased appetite and diarrhea (each 21%), and musculoskeletal pain and vomiting (each 18%). Exposure for total antibody, free MMAE, and conjugated MMAE was dose proportional. Approximately 60% of the tumor samples assessed showed high STEAP1 expression. CTC reductions were most robust at 2.8 mg/kg; 4/4 patients with unfavorable CTCs at baseline (median of 99, range: 21-205) exhibited CTC conversions from unfavorable to favorable (

7567 Background: Assessing the efficacy of molecularly targeted agents, especially in the absence of tumor shrinkage, remains a challenge. The primary objective of this prospective international tr...