Search

Cases are presented which show the clinical utility of recording an electrocochleographic response to bone-conducted stimuli. The procedure is fraught with problems of acoustic control and artifact generation, but has distinct although limited values in clarifying masking dilemmas in patients with bilateral hearing loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our experience with an application and technique for electrocochleography, specifically in retardates, is reported. A case is presented in detail; that is, a mongoloid child with many overlapping otological and audiological diagnostic problems. With the combined use of cochleography and tympanometry much of this diagnostic confusion was resolved and management was simplified. This technique is also compared with late evoked cortical audiometry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mutations in the GJB2 gene cause one form of nonsyndromic recessive deafness. Among Mediterranean Europeans, more than 80 percent of cases of nonsyndromic recessive deafness result from inheritance of the 30delG mutant allele of GJB2. We assessed the contribution of mutations in GJB2 to the prevalence of the condition among Ashkenazi Jews.Methods: We tested for mutations in GJB2 in DNA samples from three Ashkenazi Jewish families with nonsyndromic recessive deafness, from Ashkenazi Jewish persons seeking carrier testing for other conditions, and from members of other ethnic groups. The hearing of persons who were heterozygous for mutations in GJB2 was assessed by means of pure-tone audiometry, measurement of middle-ear immittance, and recording of otoacoustic emissions.Results: Two frame-shift mutations in GJB2, 167delT and 30delG, were observed in the families with nonsyndromic recessive deafness. In the Ashkenazi Jewish population the prevalence of heterozygosity for 167delT, which is rare in the general population, was 4.03 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 2.5 to 6.0 percent), and for 30delG the prevalence was 0.73 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.2 to 1.8 percent). Genetic-linkage analysis showed conservation of the haplotype for 167delT but the existence of several haplotypes for 30delG. Audiologic examination of carriers of the mutant alleles who had normal hearing revealed subtle differences in their otoacoustic emissions, suggesting that the expression of mutations in GJB2 may be semidominant.Conclusions: The high frequency of carriers of mutations in GJB2 (4.76 percent) predicts a prevalence of 1 deaf person among 1765 people, which may account for the majority of cases of nonsyndromic recessive deafness in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Conservation of the haplotype flanking the 167delT mutation suggests that this allele has a single origin, whereas the multiple haplotypes with the 30delG mutation suggest that this site is a hot spot for recurrent mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous studies of the gap-junction beta-2 subunit gene GJB2 (connexin 26) have suggested that the 101T-->C (M34T) nucleotide substitution may be a mutant allele responsible for recessive deafness DFNB1. This hypothesis was consistent with observations of negligible intercellular coupling and gap-junction assembly of the M34T allele product expressed in Xenopus oocytes and HeLa cells. The results of our current study of a family cosegregating the 167delT allele of GJB2 and severe DFNB1 deafness demonstrate that this phenotype did not cosegregate with the compound-heterozygous genotype M34T/167delT. Since 167delT is a null allele of GJB2, this result indicates that the in vivo activity of a single M34T allele is not sufficiently reduced to cause the typical deafness phenotype associated with DFNB1. This observation raises the possibility that other GJB2 missense substitutions may not be recessive mutations that cause severe deafness and emphasizes the importance of observing cosegregation with deafness in large families to confirm that these missense alleles are mutant DFNB1 alleles.