Search

Background: Dialysis might not benefit all older patients with kidney failure, particularly those with multimorbid conditions and frailty. Patients' and healthcare professionals' awareness of the presence of geriatric impairments could improve outcomes by tailoring treatment plans and decisions for individual patients. Objective: We aimed to explore the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on nephrology‐tailored geriatric assessment to fuel decision‐making for treatment choices in older patients with kidney failure. Design: In an exploratory qualitative study using focus groups, participants discussed perspectives on the use and value of nephrology‐tailored geriatric assessment for the decision‐making process to start or forego dialysis. Participants and Measurements: Patients (n = 18) with kidney failure, caregivers (n = 4), and professionals (n = 25) were purposively sampled from 10 hospitals. Interviews were audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim and inductively analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Three main themes emerged that supported or impeded decision‐making in kidney failure: (1) patient psycho‐social situation; (2) patient‐related factors on modality choice; (3) organisation of health care. Patients reported feeling vulnerable due to multiple chronic conditions, old age, experienced losses in life and their willingness to trade longevity for quality of life. Professionals recognised the added value of nephrology‐tailored geriatric assessment in three major themes: (i) facilitating continual holistic assessment, (ii) filling the knowledge gap, and (iii) uncovering important patient characteristics. Conclusions: nephrology‐tailored geriatric assessment was perceived as a valuable tool to identify geriatric impairments in older patients with kidney failure. Integration of its outcomes can facilitate a more holistic approach to inform choices and decisions about kidney replacement therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Summary points: Aim: To propose a consensus-based geriatric assessment for optimizing both routine care and research in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Findings: Using a pragmatic approach, we reached consensus on a suitable nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment to routinely identify major geriatric impairments in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. This geriatric assessment contains instruments in functional, cognitive, psychological, somatic, patient preferences, nutritional status, and social domains, and can be administered with patient questionnaires and professional-administered instruments by nurse (practitioners) in approximately 20 and 40 minutes, respectively. Message: We propose a consensus test set for standardized nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment, which is currently being implemented in multiple hospitals and studies, to benefit clinical care for older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and enhance research comparability. Purpose: Unidentified cognitive decline and other geriatric impairments are prevalent in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Despite guideline recommendation of geriatric evaluation, routine geriatric assessment is not common in these patients. While high burden of vascular disease and existing pre-dialysis care pathways mandate a tailored geriatric assessment, no consensus exists on which instruments are most suitable in this population to identify geriatric impairments. Therefore, the aim of this study was to propose a geriatric assessment, based on multidisciplinary consensus, to routinely identify major geriatric impairments in older people with advanced CKD. Methods: A pragmatic approach was chosen, which included focus groups, literature review, inventory of current practices, an expert consensus meeting, and pilot testing. In preparation of the consensus meeting, we composed a project team and an expert panel (n = 33), drafted selection criteria for the selection of instruments, and assessed potential instruments for the geriatric assessment. Results: Selection criteria related to general geriatric domains, clinical relevance, feasibility, and duration of the assessment. The consensus-assessment contains instruments in functional, cognitive, psychological, somatic, patient preferences, nutritional status, and social domains. Administration of (seven) patient questionnaires and (ten) professional-administered instruments, by nurse (practitioners), takes estimated 20 and 40 min, respectively. Results are discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting including at least nephrology and geriatric expertise, informing nephrology treatment decisions, and follow-up interventions among which comprehensive geriatric assessment. Conclusion: This first multidisciplinary consensus on nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment intent to benefit clinical care and enhance research comparability for older patients with advanced CKD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Management of severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) involves dealing with medical, nursing and psychosocial problems and therefore warrants support from a multidisciplinary team. In the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) classification system of CKD, preparation for renal replacement therapy has been recommended in CKD stage 4, characterized by a reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of <30 ml/min. In this article we share our approach to perfecting predialysis care. Tools are given to make an estimation of the progression of kidney disease. Also the prevention and treatment of metabolic complications and cardiovascular risk management are summarized. Finally, the possibilities for dialysis but even more important, aiming for pre-emptive transplantation, are being discussed. Using a multidisciplinary integrated care approach predialysis care has come of age.