Search

Background: Ultrasonographic assessment of the diameters of various veins and their indices are among the most applied diagnostic tools for evaluating fluid responsiveness in clinical practice. Despite their widespread use, there is no definitive answer on which is preferable. Our study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of different venous diameters and their indices to assess fluid responsiveness. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis, analyzing prospective studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of venous diameters (inferior vena cava [IVC], internal jugular vein [IJV], superior vena cava, and subclavian vena) and their indices for fluid responsiveness. Electronic databases were searched from inception until March 2024; this search was supplemented by snowballing methods. The risk of bias was evaluated with QUADAS-2, and evidence certainty was assessed using the GRADE approach. Nine prospective cohort studies (560 patients) were included. Results: The network meta-analysis revealed that the ΔCaval index exhibited a significant performance advantage over other "venous" test parameters. The caval index significantly outperformed IJV min/max and IVCmax. IJV index and IVCmin significantly outperformed IJVmin/max. The caval index was comparable to the IJV index. The caval index was comparable during mechanical ventilation and spontaneous breathing. Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, the ΔCaval index test showed higher diagnostic accuracy for fluid responsiveness compared with other venous tests. Caval and jugular indices displayed similar accuracy, and caval indices were consistent under mechanical ventilation and spontaneous breathing. Indices generally outperformed absolute values, except for IVCmin, which equaled the caval index in efficacy. This study was registered on the International Platform for Registered Protocols for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: INPLASY202430104.

Objective: To systematically evaluate the impact of the Trendelenburg position on hemodynamic parameters in adult patients., Design: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis using PubMed and Medline., Setting: All prospective interventional studies comparing the hemodynamic characteristics of patients in the horizontal supine position and Trendelenburg position., Measurements and Main Results: A total of 16 studies including 333 patients were found. The Trendelenburg position led to a statistically significant 11% increase in stroke volume compared with the supine position (mean difference [MD] = 8.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79; 14.76, p = 0.012). A decrease in stroke volume variation (MD = -1.36, 95% CI: 2.26; -0.46, p = 0.003) and heart rate (MD = -1.65, 95% CI: -2.86; -0.44, p = 0.008) and an increase in cardiac output (MD = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.1; 0.57, p = 0.006), mean arterial pressure (standardized MD, = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.1; 0.74, p = 0.011), central venous pressure (MD = 4.13, 95% CI: 2.42; 5.84, p < 0.001), mean pulmonary artery pressure (MD = 4.25, 95% CI: 2.69; 5.81, p < 0.001), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (MD = 16.89, 95% CI: 3.17; 30.61, p = 0.016) were found., Conclusions: The Trendelenburg position significantly increases stroke volume and improves multiple hemodynamic parameters in adult patients. These results confirm the position's potential clinical relevance in hemodynamic management and suggest the possibility of a tailored application in selected clinical settings. The duration of the beneficial effects of the Trendelenburg position and the possible side effects should be the focus of further investigation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: With machine learning (ML) carving a niche in diverse medical disciplines, its role in sepsis prediction, a condition where the 'golden hour' is critical, is of paramount interest. This study assesses the factors influencing the efficacy of ML models in sepsis prediction, aiming to optimize their use in clinical practice., Methods: We searched Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL for studies published from inception to October 2023. We focused on studies predicting sepsis in real-time settings in adult patients in any hospital settings without language limits. The primary outcome was area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic. This meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA-NMA guidelines and Cochrane Handbook recommendations. A Network Meta-Analysis using the CINeMA approach compared ML models against traditional scoring systems, with meta-regression identifying factors affecting model quality., Results: From 3,953 studies, 73 articles encompassing 457,932 septic patients and 256 models were analyzed. The pooled AUC for ML models was 0.825 and it significantly outperformed traditional scoring systems. Neural Network and Decision Tree models demonstrated the highest AUC metrics. Significant factors influencing AUC included ML model type, dataset type, and prediction window., Conclusion: This study establishes the superiority of ML models, especially Neural Network and Decision Tree types, in sepsis prediction. It highlights the importance of model type and dataset characteristics for prediction accuracy, emphasizing the necessity for standardized reporting and validation in ML healthcare applications. These findings call for broader clinical implementation to evaluate the effectiveness of these models in diverse patient groups., Systematic Review Registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-12-0062/, identifier, INPLASY2023120062., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Yadgarov, Landoni, Berikashvili, Polyakov, Kadantseva, Smirnova, Kuznetsov, Shemetova, Yakovlev and Likhvantsev.)

Objectives: The quality of postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty is crucial for patient recovery, rehabilitation, and hospital stay duration. In line with the above, а single-shot adductor canal block has been considered as an improved method over continuous femoral nerve block. However, continuous adductor canal block and single-shot femoral nerve block have been not adequately addressed in the discussion. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of various types of adductor and femoral nerve blocks on clinically relevant outcomes in patients following total knee arthroplasty., Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted following "PRISMA-NMA" and Cochrane Handbook guidelines. The eligibility criteria included randomized trials and, where these were lacking for a comparison, nonrandomized studies involving adults undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty, comparing single-shot adductor canal block, continuous adductor canal block, single-shot femoral nerve block, and continuous femoral nerve block., Results: A total of 36 studies involving 3308 patients were included. Single-shot adductor canal block showed higher pain scores and opioid consumption but better functional recovery at 24 h compared with continuous femoral nerve block. However, this trend vanishes by the 48 h assessment postsurgery. Continuous adductor canal block required higher opioid consumption but better functional recovery and shorter hospital stay compared with continuous femoral nerve block. Single-shot adductor canal block showed higher pain scores but comparable opioid consumption and functional recovery to continuous adductor canal block., Discussion: The shift from continuous femoral nerve block to single-shot adductor canal block as the preferred method for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty may be premature. While the latter improves mobility, it falls short in pain control and does not shorten hospital stays. Continuous adductor canal block shows promise but is currently underappreciated, and single-shot femoral nerve block is often overshadowed by other techniques in regional anesthesia. Further high-quality, multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The prevailing model for understanding chronic critical illness is a biphasic model, suggesting phases of acute and chronic critical conditions. A major challenge within this model is the difficulty in determining the timing of the process chronicity. It is likely that the triad of symptoms (inflammation, catabolism, and immunosuppression [ICIS]) could be associated with this particular point. We aimed to explore the impact of the symptom triad (inflammation, catabolism, immunosuppression) on the outcomes of patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs). Methods: The eICU-CRD database with 200,859 ICU admissions was analyzed. Adult patients with the ICIS triad, identified by elevated CRP (>20 mg/L), reduced albumin (<30 g/L), and low lymphocyte counts (<0.8 × 10 9 /L), were included. The cumulative risk of developing ICIS was assessed using the Nelson-Aalen estimator. Results: This retrospective cohort study included 894 patients (485 males, 54%), with 60 (6.7%) developing ICIS. The cumulative risk of ICIS by day 21 was 22.5%, with incidence peaks on days 2-3 and 10-12 after ICU admission. Patients with the ICIS triad had a 2.5-fold higher mortality risk ( p = 0.009) and double the likelihood of using vasopressors ( p = 0.008). The triad onset day did not significantly affect mortality ( p = 0.104). Patients with ICIS also experienced extended hospital ( p = 0.041) and ICU stays ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: The symptom triad (inflammation, catabolism, immunosuppression) during hospitalization increases mortality risk by 2.5 times ( p = 0.009) and reflects the chronicity of the critical condition. Identifying two incidence peaks allows the proposal of a new Tri-steps model of chronic critical illness with acute, extended, and chronic phases.

Background: Postoperative agitation is common after non-cardiac surgery. It is associated with postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction, leading to prolonged hospital stay and delayed social readjustment. Prevention and treatment strategies are lacking. We assessed the efficacy of a novel approach, the Wash In/Wash Out procedure, in reducing post-anesthetic agitation., Methods: This multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind randomized controlled trial is enrolling 200 patients undergoing open abdominal surgery. Participants are randomly assigned to either a control group receiving standard recovery methods or an investigational group undergoing the Wash In/Wash Out procedure. In the Wash In/Wash Out procedure group, sevoflurane is stopped and then promptly restarted when the patient shows the first signs of awakening to achieve an end-tidal concentration of 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) for 5 min. This stop-and-restart cycle is performed three times. The trial's primary outcome is the rate of postoperative agitation. Secondary outcomes include rate of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and length of intensive care and hospital stay., Discussion: The OPERA trial investigates the effect of the Wash In/Wash Out procedure to reduce post-anesthetic agitation in non-cardiac surgery. This study could offer a significant contribution to improving patient outcomes and optimizing recovery protocols in surgical settings., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Postoperative delirium (POD) significantly affects patient outcomes after surgery, leading to increased morbidity, extended hospital stays, and potential long-term cognitive decline. This study assessed the predictive value of intraoperative electroencephalography (EEG) patterns for POD in adults., Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA and Cochrane Handbook guidelines. A thorough literature search was conducted using PubMed, Medline, and CENTRAL databases focusing on intraoperative native EEG signal analysis in adult patients. The primary outcome was the relationship between the burst suppression EEG pattern and POD development., Results: From the initial 435 articles identified, 19 studies with a total of 7,229 patients were included in the systematic review, with 10 included in the meta-analysis (3,705 patients). In patients exhibiting burst suppression, the POD incidence was 22.1% vs. 13.4% in those without this EEG pattern (p=0.015). Furthermore, an extended burst suppression duration associated with a higher likelihood of POD occurrence ( p = 0.016). Interestingly, the burst suppression ratio showed no significant association with POD., Conclusions: This study revealed a 41% increase in the relative risk of developing POD in cases where a burst suppression pattern was present. These results underscore the clinical relevance of intraoperative EEG monitoring in predicting POD in older patients, suggesting its potential role in preventive strategies., Systematic Review Registration: This study was registered on International Platform for Registered Protocols for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: INPLASY202420001, https://doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2024.2.0001., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Likhvantsev, Berikashvili, Smirnova, Polyakov, Yadgarov, Gracheva, Romanova, Abramova, Shemetova and Kuzovlev.)

Background: Early postoperative neurocognitive disorders (ePND), include both emergence delirium, which is defined as very early onset postoperative delirium, and emergence agitation, defined as motor arousal. Although research on anesthesia emergence is limited, ePND are likely associated with unfavorable outcomes. This meta-analysis assessed the effect of ePND on clinically relevant outcomes., Methods: A systematic search of studies published between 2002 and 2022 on MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Studies that included adults with emergence agitation and/or delirium and reported at least one of the following outcomes: mortality, postoperative delirium, length of post-anesthesia care unit stay, or length of hospital stay were included. The internal validity, risk of bias, and certainty of the evidence were assessed., Results: A total of 16,028 patients from 21 prospective observational studies and one case-control retrospective study were included in this meta-analysis. The occurrence rate of ePND was 13% (data excluding the case-control study). The mortality rate was 2.4% in patients with ePND vs. 1.2% in the normal emergence group (risk ratio [RR]: 2.6, P = 0.01, very low quality of evidence). Postoperative delirium occurred in 29% of patients with ePND and 4.5% of patients with normal emergence (RR: 9.5, P < 0.001, I2 = 93%). Patients with ePND had a prolonged length of post-anesthesia care unit stay (P = 0.004) and length of hospital stay (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that ePND are associated with twice the risk of mortality and a 9-fold increased risk of postoperative delirium.