Search

Acutely ill, hospitalized medical patients are at risk of VTE. Despite guidelines for VTE prevention, prophylaxis use in these patients is still poor, possibly because of fear of bleeding risk. We used data from the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) to assess in-hospital bleeding incidence and to identify risk factors at admission associated with in-hospital bleeding risk in acutely ill medical patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Morphine is an analgesic drug used to treat acute and chronic pain. Obesity is frequently associated with pain of various origins (e.g. arthritis, fibromyalgia, cancer), which increases the need for analgesic drugs. Obesity changes drug pharmacokinetics, and for certain drugs, specific modalities of prescription have been proposed for obese patients. However, scant data are available regarding the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of morphine in obesity. Prescription of morphine depends on pain relief but the occurrence of respiratory adverse effects correlates with obesity, and is not currently taken into account. Variations in the volume of distribution, elimination half-life and oral clearance of morphine, as well as recent advances in the respective roles of drug-metabolizing enzymes, catechol-O-methyltransferase and the mu opioid receptor in morphine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, may contribute to differences between obese and non-obese patients. In addition, drug-drug interactions may alter the disposition of morphine and its glucuronide metabolites, which may either increase the risk of adverse effects or reduce drug efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Xerostomia is a subjective sensation of mouth dryness that may frequently occur in older patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and acceptability of a new oxygenated glycerol triester (OGT) oral spray taken five times daily with that of a commercially available saliva substitute (Saliveze((R))) in the treatment of xerostomia. METHODS: Forty-one institutionalised patients (28 women, 13 men; mean age 84 +/- 7 years) were randomly assigned to receive either OGT or Saliveze((R)) in a 2-week, randomised, parallel-group study. Clinical assessment of xerostomia included evaluation of mouth dryness using a self-rated, 10cm long visual analogue scale (VAS), objective assessment of oral tissue condition using a four-point ordinal scale and subjective assessment of symptoms of xerostomia using dichotomous responses to a questionnaire. The primary endpoint was the day (D) 14 patient-based mouth dryness score measured on a self-rated VAS. RESULTS: At D14, OGT resulted in significantly greater efficacy with respect to mouth dryness (mean between-treatment difference 2.1 +/- 0.1, 95% CI 1.9, 2.3; p = 0.001), swallowing difficulty (1.8 +/- 0.3, 95% CI 1.5, 2.1; p = 0.001), speech difficulty (1.1 +/- 0.2, 95% CI 1.0, 2.4; p = 0.04) and overall sensation of symptom relief (2.7 +/- 1.2, 95% CI 1.9, 3.8; p = 0.001). Objective assessment of oral tissues also showed significantly better improvement with OGT spray with respect to dryness (p = 0.01), stickiness (p = 0.005) and dullness (p = 0.001) of oral mucosa; severity of mucositis (p = 0.01); and thickening of the tongue (p = 0.03). A significant difference in taste acceptability was also noted in favour of OGT (1.4 +/- 0.6, 95% CI 1.2, 1.9; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: OGT lubricant oral spray was superior to Saliveze((R)) in improving xerostomia and oral tissue condition in older institutionalised patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based guidelines recommend that acutely ill hospitalized medical patients who are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) should receive prophylaxis. Our aim was to characterize the clinical practices for VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients enrolled in the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE). METHODS: IMPROVE is an ongoing, multinational, observational study. Participating hospitals enroll the first 10 consecutive eligible acutely ill medical patients each month. Patient management is determined by the treating physicians. An analysis of data on VTE prophylaxis practices is presented. RESULTS: From July 2002 to September 30, 2006, 15,156 patients were enrolled from 52 hospitals in 12 countries, of whom 50% received in-hospital pharmacologic and/or mechanical VTE prophylaxis. In the United States and other participating countries, 52% and 43% of patients, respectively, should have received prophylaxis according to guideline recommendations from the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP). Only approximately 60% of patients who either met the ACCP criteria for requiring prophylaxis or were eligible for enrollment in randomized clinical trials that have shown the benefits of pharmacologic prophylaxis actually received prophylaxis. Practices varied considerably. Intermittent pneumatic compression was the most common form of medical prophylaxis utilized in the United States, although it was used very rarely in other countries (22% vs 0.2%, respectively). Unfractionated heparin was the most frequent pharmacologic approach used in the United States (21% of patients), with low-molecular-weight heparin used most frequently in other participating countries (40%). There was also variable use of elastic stockings in the United States and other participating countries (3% vs 7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that physicians' practices for providing VTE prophylaxis to acutely ill hospitalized medical patients are suboptimal and highlight the need for improved implementation of existing evidence-based guidelines in hospitals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The safety and optimal use of prophylactic treatment with low-molecular-weight heparins in elderly patients with impaired renal function remain undefined. METHODS: The primary aim of this study was to analyse, in 'real life', the influence of renal function, as assessed by creatinine clearance (CL(CR)), on the level of anti-Xa activity in medical hospitalised elderly patients receiving prophylactic dosages of enoxaparin. Consecutive hospitalised acutely ill medical patients aged >/=75 years receiving daily dosages of enoxaparin 4000IU for up to 10 days were prospectively enrolled in two centres. Peak anti-Xa activity was measured at the beginning and during the course of therapy. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-five patients (31 men, 94 women), mean age 87.5 +/- 6.3 years, mean bodyweight 56.4 +/- 11.9kg and mean CL(CR) 39.8 +/- 16.1 mL/min, were enrolled in the study. The mean maximum anti-Xa activity (day 1 to day 10) [anti-Xa(max1-10)] was 0.64 +/- 0.23 IU/mL (range 0.24-1.50 IU/mL). Weak negative correlations were found between CL(CR) and anti-Xa(max) and between bodyweight and anti-Xa(max). Mean anti-Xa(max) was slightly but significantly higher in patients with CL(CR) of 20-30 mL/min compared with patients with CL(CR) of 31-40, 41-50 or 51-80 mL/min (0.72 versus 0.61, 0.61 and 0.60 IU/mL, respectively), and in patients weighing <50kg compared with patients weighing 50-60kg or >60kg (0.74 vs 0.64 and 0.52 IU/mL, respectively). Serious bleeding occurred in five patients, but anti-Xa(max) values in these patients were not different to those in patients without bleeding (p = 0.77). Individual anti-Xa(max) at the beginning or during the course of treatment was measured in the subgroup of 58 patients in whom anti-Xa activity was measured at least once during the study. The mean anti-Xa(max) value was slightly but significantly higher during the course of the therapy than at the beginning of the study (0.63 +/- 0.26 IU/mL vs 0.56 +/- 0.23 IU/mL, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Only CL(CR) <30 mL/min and bodyweight <50kg were associated with significantly higher anti-Xa(max) values. The clinical relevance of these increases remains questionable. No conclusions about the safety of enoxaparin in elderly medical patients can be drawn from these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Information about the variation in the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and in prophylaxis practices around the world is scarce. The ENDORSE (Epidemiologic International Day for the Evaluation of Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolism in the Acute Hospital Care Setting) study is a multinational cross-sectional survey designed to assess the prevalence of VTE risk in the acute hospital care setting, and to determine the proportion of at-risk patients who receive effective prophylaxis. METHODS: All hospital inpatients aged 40 years or over admitted to a medical ward, or those aged 18 years or over admitted to a surgical ward, in 358 hospitals across 32 countries were assessed for risk of VTE on the basis of hospital chart review. The 2004 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) evidence-based consensus guidelines were used to assess VTE risk and to determine whether patients were receiving recommended prophylaxis. FINDINGS: 68 183 patients were enrolled; 30 827 (45%) were categorised as surgical, and 37 356 (55%) as medical. On the basis of ACCP criteria, 35 329 (51.8%; 95% CI 51.4-52.2; between-country range 35.6-72.6) patients were judged to be at risk for VTE, including 19 842 (64.4%; 63.8-64.9; 44.1-80.2) surgical patients and 15 487 (41.5%; 41.0-42.0; 21.1-71.2) medical patients. Of the surgical patients at risk, 11 613 (58.5%; 57.8-59.2; 0.2-92.1) received ACCP-recommended VTE prophylaxis, compared with 6119 (39.5%; 38.7-40.3; 3.1-70.4) at-risk medical patients. INTERPRETATION: A large proportion of hospitalised patients are at risk for VTE, but there is a low rate of appropriate prophylaxis. Our data reinforce the rationale for the use of hospital-wide strategies to assess patients' VTE risk and to implement measures that ensure that at-risk patients receive appropriate prophylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The only disease-modifying treatment currently available for allergic rhinitis (AR) is allergen immunotherapy (AIT). The main objective of the EfficAPSI real-world study (RWS) was to evaluate the impact of liquid sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT-liquid) on asthma onset and evolution in AR patients., Methods: An analysis with propensity score weighting was performed using the EfficAPSI cohort, comparing patients dispensed SLIT-liquid with patients dispensed AR symptomatic medication with no history of AIT (controls). Index date corresponded to the first dispensation of either treatment. The sensitive definition of asthma event considered the first asthma drug dispensation, hospitalisation or long-term disease (LTD) for asthma, the specific one omitted drug dispensation and the combined one considered omalizumab or three ICS ± LABA dispensation, hospitalisation or LTD. In patients with pre-existing asthma, the GINA treatment step-up evolution was analysed., Findings: In this cohort including 112,492 SLIT-liquid and 333,082 controls, SLIT-liquid exposure was associated with a significant lower risk of asthma onset vs. control, according to all definitions (combined: HR [95% CI] = 0.62 [0.60-0.63], sensitive: 0.77 [0.76-0.78], and specific: 0.67 [0.61-0.72]). Exposure to SLIT was associated with a one-third reduction in GINA step-up regardless baseline steps., Interpretation: In this national RWS with the largest number of person-years of follow-up to date in the field of AIT, SLIT-liquid was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of asthma onset or worsening. The use of three definitions (sensitive or specific) and GINA step-up reinforced the rigorous methodology, substantiating SLIT-liquid evidence as a causal treatment option for patients with respiratory allergies., Funding: Stallergenes Greer., Competing Interests: Pascal Demoly: fees directed to research and teaching purposes: ALK-Abelló, AstraZeneca, Ménarini, GlaxoSmithKline, Stallergenes Greer, ThermoFisherScientific, Viatris, Zambon; fees for consulting: Chiesi, Puressentiel. Mathieu Molimard: fees for consulting: ALK-Abelló, Novartis, Stallergenes Greer; Jean-François Bergmann: fees for advisory boards and counselling: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, IQVIA, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda; Silvia Scurati and Laurence Girard: Employees of Stallergenes Greer; Philippe Devillier: fees for advisory boards, lectures, consulting, or support for attending meetings: ALK-Abelló, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, IQVIA, LEN Médical, Menarini, Novartis, Stallergenes-Greer, Viatris., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: The only causal treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR) is allergen immunotherapy (AIT) including personalized liquid sublingual AIT (SLIT). We present the methodology for establishing the EfficAPSI cohort to further evaluate the real-life effectiveness and use of SLIT liquid., Research Design and Methods: The EfficAPSI cohort was constituted by deterministic linkage of Stallergenes Greer dispensing and nationwide French healthcare insurance system (SNDS) databases. Data from 2006 to 2018 were extracted. All patients who initiated Stallergenes Greer SLIT liquid between 2010 and 2013 were considered as exposed and those dispensed with AR symptomatic treatment only as control. To limit the impact of confounding, the models will be weighted using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)., Results: A total of 445,574 patients were included; median age was 38 years; 59.1% were female. Exposed patients ( n  = 112,492) were significantly younger, more frequently males, and less likely to have comorbidities than controls ( n  = 333,082). After IPTW, patients' characteristics from both groups were similar., Conclusions: To date, the EfficAPSI cohort has the largest number of person-years of follow-up in the field of AIT. The completeness of the data allows to evaluate SLIT liquid effectiveness with rigorous methodology, leading to important insights on personalized medicine in real-life.

Objectives: The emergence of targeted therapy is changing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management, but real-world data remain limited. This study aimed to describe real-world RA treatment patterns using data from a French national claims database., Methods: This longitudinal study used the French Permanent Representative Sample (Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires) claims database. Patients with RA were identified between 2013 and 2017, with treatment patterns, persistence and adherence described., Results: The study population included 2553 patients with RA. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were prescribed for 1512 (59.2%) patients, of whom 721 (47.6%) did not require discontinuation or treatment switch. There were 377 (24.9%) treatment discontinuations and 114 patients (7.5%) switched to a targeted DMARD (biological and synthetic (Janus kinase inhibitor) DMARDs). Among the 2315 patients with RA in 2017, almost half (n=1102, 47.6%) were not treated with a DMARD. Most (85.7%) received symptomatic treatment (analgesics (81.0%), steroids (49.2%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (39.5%)). Of the 1142 treatment initiations identified, 713 (62.4%) were conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), with methotrexate being the most frequent (n=553, 48.45%). One-year persistence rates varied between 55.9% (49.2-62.0%) for tumour necrosis factor inhibitors, and 63.4% (59.6-67.0%) for csDMARDs. Treatment adherence, assessed through medication possession ratio, varied between 71.9% and 90.8%, with ≥80% being the adherence cut-off. Almost half of DMARD initiations were associated with long-term (>6 months), high-dose oral steroid use (~7 mg/day prednisone equivalent)., Conclusion: Despite a diverse therapeutic arsenal, there remains a medical need that is not covered by current RA management, which is frequently compensated for by overprescription of steroids., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CG-V reports serving as a consultant and on a speaker’s bureau for AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Medac, Merck Serono, Mylan, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB. BF has received research grants from AbbVie, Lilly, MSD and Pfizer, and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Mylan, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI and UCB. J-FB has received consultancy fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Takeda. SB is an employee of stève consultants and carried out the study for Galapagos. AE is an employee of Galapagos. AM is an employee of stève consultants and carried out the study for Galapagos. MGu is an employee of Galapagos. MGo is an employee of stève consultants and carried out the study for Galapagos., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Surveillance of pancreatic cysts focuses on the detection of (mostly morphologic) features warranting surgery. European guidelines consider elevated CA19.9 as a relative indication for surgery. We aimed to evaluate the role of CA19.9 monitoring for early detection and management in a cyst surveillance population., Methods: The PACYFIC-registry is a prospective collaboration that investigates the yield of pancreatic cyst surveillance performed at the discretion of the treating physician. We included participants for whom at least one serum CA19.9 value was determined by a minimum follow-up of 12 months., Results: Of 1865 PACYFIC participants, 685 met the inclusion criteria for this study (mean age 67 years, SD 10; 61% female). During a median follow-up of 25 months (IQR 24, 1966 visits), 29 participants developed high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or pancreatic cancer. At baseline, CA19.9 ranged from 1 to 591 kU/L (median 10 kU/L [IQR 14]), and was elevated (≥37 kU/L) in 64 participants (9%). During 191 of 1966 visits (10%), an elevated CA19.9 was detected, and these visits more often led to an intensified follow-up (42%) than those without an elevated CA19.9 (27%; p < 0.001). An elevated CA19.9 was the sole reason for surgery in five participants with benign disease (10%). The baseline CA19.9 value was (as continuous or dichotomous variable at the 37 kU/L threshold) not independently associated with HGD or pancreatic cancer development, whilst a CA19.9 of ≥ 133 kU/L was (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.1-13, p = 0.03)., Conclusions: In this pancreatic cyst surveillance cohort, CA19.9 monitoring caused substantial harm by shortening surveillance intervals (and performance of unnecessary surgery). The current CA19.9 cutoff was not predictive of HGD and pancreatic cancer, whereas a higher cutoff may decrease false-positive values. The role of CA19.9 monitoring should be critically appraised prior to implementation in surveillance programs and guidelines., (© 2023 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.)

Objectives: Key challenges for a joint European Health Technology Assessment (HTA) include consolidated approaches towards the choice of adequate comparator(s), selection of endpoints that are relevant to patients with a given disease, dealing with remaining uncertainties as well as transparent and consistent management of related processes. We aimed to further crystallize related core domains within these four areas that warrant further research and scrutiny., Methods: Building on the outcomes of a previously conducted questionnaire survey, four key areas, processes, uncertainty, comparator choice and endpoint selection, were identified. At the inaugural convention of the European Access Academy dedicated working groups were established defining and prioritizing core domains for each of the four areas. The working groups consisted of ~ 10 participants each, representing all relevant stakeholder groups (patients/ clinicians/ regulators/ HTA & payers/ academia/ industry). Story books identifying the work assignments were shared in advance. Two leads and one note taker per working group facilitated the process. All rankings were conducted on an ordinal Likert Response Scale scoring from 1 (low priority) to 7 (high priority)., Results: Identified key domains include for processes: i) address (resource-) challenge of multiple PICOs (Patient/ Intervention/ Comparator/ Outcomes), ii) time and capacity challenges, iii) integrating all involved stakeholders, iv) conflicts and aligning between different multi-national stakeholders, v) interaction with health technology developer; for uncertainty: i) early and inclusive collaboration, ii) agreement on feasibility of RCT and acceptance of uncertainty, iii) alignment on closing evidence gaps, iv) capacity gaps; for comparator choice: i) criteria for the choice of comparator in an increasingly fragmented treatment landscape, ii) reasonable number of comparators in PICOs, iii) shape Early Advice so that comparator fulfils both regulatory and HTA needs, iv) acceptability of Indirect Treatment Comparisons (ITC), v) ensure broad stakeholder involvement in comparator selection; for endpoint selection: i) approaching new endpoints; ii) patient preferences on endpoints; iii) position of HTA and other stakeholders; iv) long-term generation and secondary use of data; v) endpoint challenges in RCTs., Conclusions: The implementation of a joint European HTA assessment is a unique opportunity for a stronger European Health Union. We identified 19 domains related to the four key areas, processes, uncertainty, comparator choice and endpoint selection that urgently need to be addressed for this regulation to become a success., (© 2022. The Author(s).)