Search

One of the main challenges in surrogate modeling is the limited availability of data due to resource constraints associated with computationally expensive simulations. Multi-fidelity methods provide a solution by chaining models in a hierarchy with increasing fidelity, associated with lower error, but increasing cost. In this paper, we compare different multi-fidelity methods employed in constructing Gaussian process surrogates for regression. Non-linear autoregressive methods in the existing literature are primarily confined to two-fidelity models, and we extend these methods to handle more than two levels of fidelity. Additionally, we propose enhancements for an existing method incorporating delay terms by introducing a structured kernel. We demonstrate the performance of these methods across various academic and real-world scenarios. Our findings reveal that multi-fidelity methods generally have a smaller prediction error for the same computational cost as compared to the single-fidelity method, although their effectiveness varies across different scenarios.

We revisit recently published high-fidelity implicit large eddy simulation datasets obtained with a high-order discontinuous Galerkin spectral element method and analyse them using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) as well as Spectral Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (SPOD). The first configuration is the MTU T161 low-pressure turbine cascade with resolved end wall boundary layers in a clean version and one with incoming turbulent wakes. We focus on the behaviour of the laminar separation bubble and the secondary flow system and how these phenomena are affected by incoming wakes. The second configuration is a transonic compressor cascade in which we analyse the unsteady behaviour of the shock wave boundary layer interaction. Throughout the paper, we try to discuss not only the flow physics but also insights into how the modal decomposition techniques can help facilitate understanding and where their limitations are., Comment: Submitted to Cambridge Unsteady Flow Symposium 2024

We present results of implicit large eddy simulation (LES) and different Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models of the MTU 161 low pressure turbine at an exit Reynolds number of 90,000 and exit Mach number of 0.6. The LES results are based on a high order discontinuous Galerkin method and the RANS is computed using a classical finite-volume approach. The paper discusses the steps taken to create realistic inflow boundary conditions in terms of end wall boundary layer thickness and free stream turbulence intensity. This is achieved by tailoring the input distribution of total pressure and temperature, Reynolds stresses and turbulent length scale to a Fourier series based synthetic turbulence generator. With this procedure, excellent agreement with the experiment can be achieved in terms of blade loading at midspan and wake total pressure losses at midspan and over the channel height. Based on the validated setup, we focus on the discussion of secondary flow structures emerging due to the interaction of the incoming boundary layer and the turbine blade and compare the LES to two commonly used RANS models. Since we are able to create consistent setups for both LES and RANS, all discrepancies can be directly attributed to physical modelling problems. We show that both a linear eddy viscosity model and a differential Reynolds stress model coupled with a state-of-the-art correlation-based transition model fail, in this case, to predict the separation induced transition process around midspan. Moreover, their prediction of secondary flow losses leaves room for improvement as shown by a detailed discussion turbulence kinetic energy and anisotropy fields., Comment: invited submission to Flow, Turbulence and Combustion Special Issue: 13th ERCOFTAC Workshop on Direct and Large Eddy Simulation - DLES13

We present first results of an implicit large eddy simulation of the MTU T161 low pressure turbine at a Reynolds number of 90,000 and Mach number of 0.6, both based on isentropic exit conditions, using a high order discontinuous Galerkin method. The aim is to validate the numerical setup with respect to available experimental data. We discuss the steps taken to create realistic inflow boundary conditions in terms of end wall boundary layer thickness and free stream turbulence intensity. This is achieved by tailoring the input distribution of Reynolds stresses and turbulent length scale to a Fourier series based synthetic turbulence generator. Both blade loading and total pressure losses at midspan show excellent agreement with the measurements. Following a short discussion of the secondary flow structures emerging due to the interaction of the incoming boundary layer and the turbine blade, we show that this simulation is also able to reproduce loss distribution behind the blade over the whole channel height., Comment: submitted to conference proceedings of DLES13 (Direct and Large Eddy Simulation)