Search

In an influential article Papadimitriou [FOCS 1991] proved that a local search algorithm called WalkSAT finds a satisfying assignment of a satisfiable 2-CNF with $n$ variables in $O(n^2)$ expected time. Variants of the WalkSAT algorithm have become a mainstay of practical SAT solving (e.g., [Hoos and St\"utzle 2000]). In the present article we analyse the expected running time of WalkSAT on random 2-SAT instances. Answering a question raised by Alekhnovich and Ben-Sasson [SICOMP 2007], we show that WalkSAT runs in linear expected time for all clause/variable densities up to the random 2-SAT satisfiability threshold.

In the classical Approximate Majority problem with two opinions there are agents with Opinion 1 and with Opinion 2. The goal is to reach consensus and to agree on the majority opinion if the bias is sufficiently large. It is well known that the problem can be solved efficiently using the Undecided State Dynamics (USD) where an agent interacting with an agent of the opposite opinion becomes undecided. In this paper, we consider a variant of the USD with a preferred Opinion 1. That is, agents with Opinion 1 behave stubbornly -- they preserve their opinion with probability $p$ whenever they interact with an agent having Opinion 2. Our main result shows a phase transition around the stubbornness parameter $p \approx 1-x_1/x_2$. If $x_1 = \Theta(n)$ and $p \geq 1-x_1/x_2 + o(1)$, then all agents agree on Opinion 1 after $O(n\cdot \log n)$ interactions. On the other hand, for $p \leq 1-x_1/x_2 - o(1)$, all agents agree on Opinion 2, again after $O(n\cdot \log n)$ interactions. Finally, if $p \approx 1-x_1/x_2$, then all agents do agree on one opinion after $O(n\cdot \log^2 n)$ interactions, but either of the two opinions can survive. All our results hold with high probability.

We consider the \emph{exact plurality consensus} problem for \emph{population protocols}. Here, $n$ anonymous agents start each with one of $k$ opinions. Their goal is to agree on the initially most frequent opinion (the \emph{plurality opinion}) via random, pairwise interactions. The case of $k = 2$ opinions is known as the \emph{majority problem}. Recent breakthroughs led to an always correct, exact majority population protocol that is both time- and space-optimal, needing $O(\log n)$ states per agent and, with high probability, $O(\log n)$ time~[Doty, Eftekhari, Gasieniec, Severson, Stachowiak, and Uznanski; 2021]. We know that any always correct protocol requires $\Omega(k^2)$ states, while the currently best protocol needs $O(k^{11})$ states~[Natale and Ramezani; 2019]. For ordered opinions, this can be improved to $O(k^6)$~[Gasieniec, Hamilton, Martin, Spirakis, and Stachowiak; 2016]. We design protocols for plurality consensus that beat the quadratic lower bound by allowing a negligible failure probability. While our protocols might fail, they identify the plurality opinion with high probability even if the bias is $1$. Our first protocol achieves this via $k-1$ tournaments in time $O(k \cdot \log n)$ using $O(k + \log n)$ states. While it assumes an ordering on the opinions, we remove this restriction in our second protocol, at the cost of a slightly increased time $O(k \cdot \log n + \log^2 n)$. By efficiently pruning insignificant opinions, our final protocol reduces the number of tournaments at the cost of a slightly increased state complexity $O(k \cdot \log\log n + \log n)$. This improves the time to $O(n / x_{\max} \cdot \log n + \log^2 n)$, where $x_{\max}$ is the initial size of the plurality. Note that $n/x_{\max}$ is at most $k$ and can be much smaller (e.g., in case of a large bias or if there are many small opinions).

We analyze the convergence of the $k$-opinion Undecided State Dynamics (USD) in the population protocol model. For $k$=2 opinions it is well known that the USD reaches consensus with high probability within $O(n \log n)$ interactions. Proving that the process also quickly solves the consensus problem for $k>2$ opinions has remained open, despite analogous results for larger $k$ in the related parallel gossip model. In this paper we prove such convergence: under mild assumptions on $k$ and on the initial number of undecided agents we prove that the USD achieves plurality consensus within $O(k n \log n)$ interactions with high probability, regardless of the initial bias. Moreover, if there is an initial additive bias of at least $\Omega(\sqrt{n} \log n)$ we prove that the initial plurality opinion wins with high probability, and if there is a multiplicative bias the convergence time is further improved. Note that this is the first result for $k > 2$ for the USD in the population protocol model. Furthermore, it is the first result for the unsynchronized variant of the USD with $k>2$ which does not need any initial bias.

In this paper we study dynamic averaging load balancing on general graphs. We consider infinite time and dynamic processes, where in every step new load items are assigned to randomly chosen nodes. A matching is chosen, and the load is averaged over the edges of that matching. We analyze the discrete case where load items are indivisible, moreover our results also carry over to the continuous case where load items can be split arbitrarily. For the choice of the matchings we consider three different models, random matchings of linear size, random matchings containing only single edges, and deterministic sequences of matchings covering the whole graph. We bound the discrepancy, which is defined as the difference between the maximum and the minimum load. Our results cover a broad range of graph classes and, to the best of our knowledge, our analysis is the first result for discrete and dynamic averaging load balancing processes. As our main technical contribution we develop a drift result that allows us to apply techniques based on the effective resistance in an electrical network to the setting of dynamic load balancing.

We consider two simple asynchronous opinion dynamics on arbitrary graphs where every node $u$ has an initial value $\xi_u(0)$. In the first process, the NodeModel, at each time step $t\ge 0$, a random node $u$ and a random sample of $k$ of its neighbours $v_1,v_2,\cdots,v_k$ are selected. Then, $u$ updates its current value $\xi_u(t)$ to $\xi_u(t+1) = \alpha \xi_u(t) + \frac{(1-\alpha)}{k} \sum_{i=1}^k \xi_{v_i}(t)$, where $\alpha \in (0,1)$ and $k\ge 1$ are parameters of the process. In the second process, the EdgeModel, at each step a random pair of adjacent nodes $(u,v)$ is selected, and then node $u$ updates its value equivalently to the NodeModel with $k=1$ and $v$ as the selected neighbour. For both processes, the values of all nodes converge to $F$, a random variable depending on the random choices made in each step. For the NodeModel and regular graphs, and for the EdgeModel and arbitrary graphs, the expectation of $F$ is the average of the initial values $\frac{1}{n}\sum_{u\in V} \xi_u(0)$. For the NodeModel and non-regular graphs, the expectation of $F$ is the degree-weighted average of the initial values. Our results are two-fold. We consider the concentration of $F$ and show tight bounds on the variance of $F$ for regular graphs. We show that, when the initial values do not depend on the number of nodes, then the variance is negligible, hence the nodes are able to estimate the initial average of the node values. Interestingly, this variance does not depend on the graph structure. For the proof we introduce a duality between our processes and a process of two correlated random walks. We also analyse the convergence time for both models and for arbitrary graphs, showing bounds on the time $T_\varepsilon$ required to make all node values `$\varepsilon$-close' to each other. Our bounds are asymptotically tight under assumptions on the distribution of the initial values., Comment: 21 pages, 6 figures

We consider the so-called Independent Cascade Model for rumor spreading or epidemic processes popularized by Kempe et al.\ [2003]. In this model, a small subset of nodes from a network are the source of a rumor. In discrete time steps, each informed node "infects" each of its uninformed neighbors with probability $p$. While many facets of this process are studied in the literature, less is known about the inference problem: given a number of infected nodes in a network, can we learn the source of the rumor? In the context of epidemiology this problem is often referred to as patient zero problem. It belongs to a broader class of problems where the goal is to infer parameters of the underlying spreading model, see, e.g., Lokhov [NeurIPS'16] or Mastakouri et al. [NeurIPS'20]. In this work we present a maximum likelihood estimator for the rumor's source, given a snapshot of the process in terms of a set of active nodes $X$ after $t$ steps. Our results show that, for cycle-free graphs, the likelihood estimator undergoes a non-trivial phase transition as a function $t$. We provide a rigorous analysis for two prominent classes of acyclic network, namely $d$-regular trees and Galton-Watson trees, and verify empirically that our heuristics work well in various general networks.

We study the Consensus problem among $n$ agents, defined as follows. Initially, each agent holds one of two possible opinions. The goal is to reach a consensus configuration in which every agent shares the same opinion. To this end, agents randomly sample other agents and update their opinion according to a simple update function depending on the sampled opinions. We consider two communication models: the gossip model and a variant of the population model. In the gossip model, agents are activated in parallel, synchronous rounds. In the population model, one agent is activated after the other in a sequence of discrete time steps. For both models we analyze the following natural family of majority processes called $j$-Majority: when activated, every agent samples $j$ other agents uniformly at random (with replacement) and adopts the majority opinion among the sample (breaking ties uniformly at random). As our main result we show a hierarchy among majority protocols: $(j+1)$-Majority (for $j > 1$) converges stochastically faster than $j$-Majority for any initial opinion configuration. In our analysis we use Strassen's Theorem to prove the existence of a coupling. This gives an affirmative answer for the case of two opinions to an open question asked by Berenbrink et al. [2017].

Opinion spreading in a society decides the fate of elections, the success of products, and the impact of political or social movements. The model by Hegselmann and Krause is a well-known theoretical model to study such opinion formation processes in social networks. In contrast to many other theoretical models, it does not converge towards a situation where all agents agree on the same opinion. Instead, it assumes that people find an opinion reasonable if and only if it is close to their own. The system converges towards a stable situation where agents sharing the same opinion form a cluster, and agents in different clusters do not \mbox{influence each other.} We focus on the social variant of the Hegselmann-Krause model where agents are connected by a social network and their opinions evolve in an iterative process. When activated, an agent adopts the average of the opinions of its neighbors having a similar opinion. By this, the set of influencing neighbors of an agent may change over time. To the best of our knowledge, social Hegselmann-Krause systems with asynchronous opinion updates have only been studied with the complete graph as social network. We show that such opinion dynamics with random agent activation are guaranteed to converge for any social network. We provide an upper bound of $\mathcal{O}(n|E|^2 (\varepsilon/\delta)^2)$ on the expected number of opinion updates until convergence, where $|E|$ is the number of edges of the social network. For the complete social network we show a bound of $\mathcal{O}(n^3(n^2 + (\varepsilon/\delta)^2))$ that represents a major improvement over the previously best upper bound of $\mathcal{O}(n^9 (\varepsilon/\delta)^2)$. Our bounds are complemented by simulations that indicate asymptotically matching lower bounds., Comment: Full version with extended results compared to the AAMAS'22 version

We present a loosely-stabilizing phase clock for population protocols. In the population model we are given a system of $n$ identical agents which interact in a sequence of randomly chosen pairs. Our phase clock is leaderless and it requires $O(\log n)$ states. It runs forever and is, at any point of time, in a synchronous state w.h.p. When started in an arbitrary configuration, it recovers rapidly and enters a synchronous configuration within $O(n\log n)$ interactions w.h.p. Once the clock is synchronized, it stays in a synchronous configuration for at least poly $n$ parallel time w.h.p. We use our clock to design a loosely-stabilizing protocol that solves the comparison problem introduced by Alistarh et al., 2021. In this problem, a subset of agents has at any time either $A$ or $B$ as input. The goal is to keep track which of the two opinions is (momentarily) the majority. We show that if the majority has a support of at least $\Omega(\log n)$ agents and a sufficiently large bias is present, then the protocol converges to a correct output within $O(n\log n)$ interactions and stays in a correct configuration for poly $n$ interactions, w.h.p.

We consider the plurality consensus problem among $n$ agents. Initially, each agent has one of $k$ different opinions. Agents choose random interaction partners and revise their state according to a fixed transition function, depending on their own state and the state of the interaction partners. The goal is to reach a consensus configuration in which all agents agree on the same opinion, and if there is initially a sufficiently large bias towards one opinion, that opinion should prevail. We analyze a synchronized variant of the undecided state dynamics defined as follows. The agents act in phases, consisting of a decision and a boosting part. In the decision part, any agent that encounters an agent with a different opinion becomes undecided. In the boosting part, undecided agents adopt the first opinion they encounter. We consider this dynamics in the population model and the gossip model. For the population model, our protocol reaches consensus (w.h.p.) in $O(\log^2 n)$ parallel time, providing the first polylogarithmic result for $k > 2$ (w.h.p.) in this model. Without any assumption on the bias, fast consensus has only been shown for $k = 2$ for the unsynchronized version of the undecided state dynamics [Clementi et al., MFCS'18]. We show that the synchronized variant of the undecided state dynamics reaches consensus (w.h.p.) in time $O(\log^2 n)$, independently of the initial number, bias, or distribution of opinions. In both models, we guarantee that if there is an initial bias of $\Omega(\sqrt{n \log n})$, then (w.h.p.) that opinion wins. A simple extension of our protocol in the gossip model yields a dynamics that does not depend on $n$ or $k$, is anonymous, and has (w.h.p.) runtime $O(\log^2 n)$. This solves an open problem formulated by Becchetti et al.~[Distributed Computing,~2017].

We consider the problem of efficiently simulating population protocols. In the population model, we are given a distributed system of $n$ agents modeled as identical finite-state machines. In each time step, a pair of agents is selected uniformly at random to interact. In an interaction, agents update their states according to a common transition function. We empirically and analytically analyze two classes of simulators for this model. First, we consider sequential simulators executing one interaction after the other. Key to the performance of these simulators is the data structure storing the agents' states. For our analysis, we consider plain arrays, binary search trees, and a novel Dynamic Alias Table data structure. Secondly, we consider batch processing to efficiently update the states of multiple independent agents in one step. For many protocols considered in literature, our simulator requires amortized sub-constant time per interaction and is fast in practice: given a fixed time budget, the implementation of our batched simulator is able to simulate population protocols several orders of magnitude larger compared to the sequential competitors, and can carry out $2^{50}$ interactions among the same number of agents in less than 400s.

We consider the problem of counting the population size in the population model. In this model, we are given a distributed system of $n$ identical agents which interact in pairs with the goal to solve a common task. In each time step, the two interacting agents are selected uniformly at random. In this paper, we consider so-called uniform protocols, where the actions of two agents upon an interaction may not depend on the population size $n$. We present two population protocols to count the size of the population: protocol Approximate, which computes with high probability either $\lfloor\log n\rfloor$ or $\lceil\log n\rceil$, and protocol CountExact, which computes the exact population size in optimal $\operatorname{O}({n\log{n}})$ interactions, using $\tilde{\operatorname{O}}({n})$ states. Both protocols can also be converted to stable protocols that give a correct result with probability $1$ by using an additional multiplicative factor of $\operatorname{O}({\log{n}})$ states.

We consider the following load balancing process for $m$ tokens distributed arbitrarily among $n$ nodes connected by a complete graph: In each time step a pair of nodes is selected uniformly at random. Let $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ be their respective number of tokens. The two nodes exchange tokens such that they have $\lceil(\ell_1 + \ell_2)/2\rceil$ and $\lfloor(\ell_1 + \ell_2)/2\rfloor$ tokens, respectively. We provide a simple analysis showing that this process reaches almost perfect balance within $O(n\log{n} + n \log{\Delta})$ steps, where $\Delta$ is the maximal initial load difference between any two nodes.

A population protocol can be viewed as a sequence of pairwise interactions of $n$ agents (nodes). During one interaction, two agents selected uniformly at random update their states by applying a specified deterministic transition function. In a long run, the whole system should stabilize at the correct output property. The main performance objectives in designing population protocols are small number of states per agent and fast stabilization time. We present a fast population protocol for the exact-majority problem which uses $\Theta(\log n)$ states (per agent) and stabilizes in $O(\log^{5/3} n)$ parallel time (i.e., $O(n\log^{5/3} n)$ interactions) in expectation and with high probability. Alistarh et al. [SODA 2018] showed that any exact-majority protocol which stabilizes in expected $O(n^{1-\epsilon})$ parallel time, for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, requires $\Omega(\log n)$ states. They also showed an $O(\log^2 n)$-time protocol with $O(\log n)$ states, the currently fastest exact-majority protocol with polylogarithmic number of states. The standard design framework for majority protocols is based on $O(\log n)$ phases and requires that all nodes are well synchronized within each phase, leading naturally to upper bounds of the order of at least $\log^2 n$ because of $\Theta(\log n)$ synchronization time per phase. We show how this framework can be tightened with {\em weak synchronization} to break the $O(\log^2 n)$ upper bound of previous protocols.

Population protocols are a model for distributed computing that is focused on simplicity and robustness. A system of $n$ identical agents (finite state machines) performs a global task like electing a unique leader or determining the majority opinion when each agent has one of two opinions. Agents communicate in pairwise interactions with randomly assigned communication partners. Quality is measured in two ways: the number of interactions to complete the task and the number of states per agent. We present protocols for the majority problem that allow for a trade-off between these two measures. Compared to the only other trade-off result [Alistarh, Gelashvili, Vojnovic; PODC'15], we improve the number of interactions by almost a linear factor. Furthermore, our protocols can be made uniform (working correctly without any information on the population size $n$), yielding the first uniform majority protocols that stabilize in a subquadratic number of interactions.

We consider the following balls-into-bins process with $n$ bins and $m$ balls: each ball is equipped with a mutually independent exponential clock of rate 1. Whenever a ball's clock rings, the ball samples a random bin and moves there if the number of balls in the sampled bin is smaller than in its current bin. This simple process models a typical load balancing problem where users (balls) seek a selfish improvement of their assignment to resources (bins). From a game theoretic perspective, this is a randomized approach to the well-known Koutsoupias-Papadimitriou model, while it is known as randomized local search (RLS) in load balancing literature. Up to now, the best bound on the expected time to reach perfect balance was $O\left({(\ln n)}^2+\ln(n)\cdot n^2/m\right)$ due to Ganesh, Lilienthal, Manjunath, Proutiere, and Simatos (Load balancing via random local search in closed and open systems, Queueing Systems, 2012). We improve this to an asymptotically tight $O\left(\ln(n)+n^2/m\right)$. Our analysis is based on the crucial observation that performing "destructive moves" (reversals of RLS moves) cannot decrease the balancing time. This allows us to simplify problem instances and to ignore "inconvenient moves" in the analysis., Comment: 24 pages, 3 figures, preliminary version appeared in proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS'17)

We study consensus processes on the complete graph of $n$ nodes. Initially, each node supports one from up to n opinions. Nodes randomly and in parallel sample the opinions of constant many nodes. Based on these samples, they use an update rule to change their own opinion. The goal is to reach consensus, a configuration where all nodes support the same opinion. We compare two well-known update rules: 2-Choices and 3-Majority. In the former, each node samples two nodes and adopts their opinion if they agree. In the latter, each node samples three nodes: If an opinion is supported by at least two samples the node adopts it, otherwise it randomly adopts one of the sampled opinions. Known results for these update rules focus on initial configurations with a limited number of colors (say $n^{1/3}$ ), or typically assume a bias, where one opinion has a much larger support than any other. For such biased configurations, the time to reach consensus is roughly the same for 2-Choices and 3-Majority. Interestingly, we prove that this is no longer true for configurations with a large number of initial colors. In particular, we show that 3-Majority reaches consensus with high probability in $O(n^{3/4}\log^{7/8}n)$ rounds, while 2-Choices can need $\Omega(n/\log n)$ rounds. We thus get the first unconditional sublinear bound for 3-Majority and the first result separating the consensus time of these processes. Along the way, we develop a framework that allows a fine-grained comparison between consensus processes from a specific class. We believe that this framework might help to classify the performance of more consensus processes.

A fundamental problem in distributed computing is the distribution of requests to a set of uniform servers without a centralized controller. Classically, such problems are modeled as static balls into bins processes, where $m$ balls (tasks) are to be distributed to $n$ bins (servers). In a seminal work, Azar et al. proposed the sequential strategy \greedy{d} for $n=m$. When thrown, a ball queries the load of $d$ random bins and is allocated to a least loaded of these. Azar et al. showed that $d=2$ yields an exponential improvement compared to $d=1$. Berenbrink et al. extended this to $m\gg n$, showing that the maximal load difference is independent of $m$ for $d=2$ (in contrast to $d=1$). We propose a new variant of an \emph{infinite} balls into bins process. Each round an expected number of $\lambda n$ new balls arrive and are distributed (in parallel) to the bins. Each non-empty bin deletes one of its balls. This setting models a set of servers processing incoming requests, where clients can query a server's current load but receive no information about parallel requests. We study the \greedy{d} distribution scheme in this setting and show a strong self-stabilizing property: For \emph{any} arrival rate $\lambda=\lambda(n)<1$, the system load is time-invariant. Moreover, for \emph{any} (even super-exponential) round $t$, the maximum system load is (w.h.p.) $O(\frac{1}{1-\lambda}\cdot\log\frac{n}{1-\lambda})$ for $d=1$ and $O(\log\frac{n}{1-\lambda})$ for $d=2$. In particular, \greedy{2} has an exponentially smaller system load for high arrival rates.

In the voter model, each node of a graph has an opinion, and in every round each node chooses independently a random neighbour and adopts its opinion. We are interested in the consensus time, which is the first point in time where all nodes have the same opinion. We consider dynamic graphs in which the edges are rewired in every round (by an adversary) giving rise to the graph sequence $G_1, G_2, \dots $, where we assume that $G_i$ has conductance at least $\phi_i$. We assume that the degrees of nodes don't change over time as one can show that the consensus time can become super-exponential otherwise. In the case of a sequence of $d$-regular graphs, we obtain asymptotically tight results. Even for some static graphs, such as the cycle, our results improve the state of the art. Here we show that the expected number of rounds until all nodes have the same opinion is bounded by $O(m/(d_{min} \cdot \phi))$, for any graph with $m$ edges, conductance $\phi$, and degrees at least $d_{min}$. In addition, we consider a biased dynamic voter model, where each opinion $i$ is associated with a probability $P_i$, and when a node chooses a neighbour with that opinion, it adopts opinion $i$ with probability $P_i$ (otherwise the node keeps its current opinion). We show for any regular dynamic graph, that if there is an $\epsilon>0$ difference between the highest and second highest opinion probabilities, and at least $\Omega(\log n)$ nodes have initially the opinion with the highest probability, then all nodes adopt w.h.p. that opinion. We obtain a bound on the convergences time, which becomes $O(\log n/\phi)$ for static graphs.

We consider \emph{plurality consensus} in a network of $n$ nodes. Initially, each node has one of $k$ opinions. The nodes execute a (randomized) distributed protocol to agree on the plurality opinion (the opinion initially supported by the most nodes). Nodes in such networks are often quite cheap and simple, and hence one seeks protocols that are not only fast but also simple and space efficient. Typically, protocols depend heavily on the employed communication mechanism, which ranges from sequential (only one pair of nodes communicates at any time) to fully parallel (all nodes communicate with all their neighbors at once) communication and everything in-between. We propose a framework to design protocols for a multitude of communication mechanisms. We introduce protocols that solve the plurality consensus problem and are with probability 1-o(1) both time and space efficient. Our protocols are based on an interesting relationship between plurality consensus and distributed load balancing. This relationship allows us to design protocols that generalize the state of the art for a large range of problem parameters. In particular, we obtain the same bounds as the recent result of Alistarh et al. (who consider only two opinions on a clique) using a much simpler protocol that generalizes naturally to general graphs and multiple opinions.

In this paper we consider a wide class of discrete diffusion load balancing algorithms. The problem is defined as follows. We are given an interconnection network and a number of load items, which are arbitrarily distributed among the nodes of the network. The goal is to redistribute the load in iterative discrete steps such that at the end each node has (almost) the same number of items. In diffusion load balancing nodes are only allowed to balance their load with their direct neighbors. We show three main results. Firstly, we present a general framework for randomly rounding the flow generated by continuous diffusion schemes over the edges of a graph in order to obtain corresponding discrete schemes. Compared to the results of Rabani, Sinclair, and Wanka, FOCS'98, which are only valid w.r.t. the class of homogeneous first order schemes, our framework can be used to analyze a larger class of diffusion algorithms, such as algorithms for heterogeneous networks and second order schemes. Secondly, we bound the deviation between randomized second order schemes and their continuous counterparts. Finally, we provide a bound for the minimum initial load in a network that is sufficient to prevent the occurrence of negative load at a node during the execution of second order diffusion schemes. Our theoretical results are complemented with extensive simulations on different graph classes. We show empirically that second order schemes, which are usually much faster than first order schemes, will not balance the load completely on a number of networks within reasonable time. However, the maximum load difference at the end seems to be bounded by a constant value, which can be further decreased if first order scheme is applied once this value is achieved by second order scheme., Comment: Full version of paper submitted to ICDCS 2015

We consider the problem of deterministic load balancing of tokens in the discrete model. A set of $n$ processors is connected into a $d$-regular undirected network. In every time step, each processor exchanges some of its tokens with each of its neighbors in the network. The goal is to minimize the discrepancy between the number of tokens on the most-loaded and the least-loaded processor as quickly as possible. Rabani et al. (1998) present a general technique for the analysis of a wide class of discrete load balancing algorithms. Their approach is to characterize the deviation between the actual loads of a discrete balancing algorithm with the distribution generated by a related Markov chain. The Markov chain can also be regarded as the underlying model of a continuous diffusion algorithm. Rabani et al. showed that after time $T = O(\log (Kn)/\mu)$, any algorithm of their class achieves a discrepancy of $O(d\log n/\mu)$, where $\mu$ is the spectral gap of the transition matrix of the graph, and $K$ is the initial load discrepancy in the system. In this work we identify some natural additional conditions on deterministic balancing algorithms, resulting in a class of algorithms reaching a smaller discrepancy. This class contains well-known algorithms, eg., the Rotor-Router. Specifically, we introduce the notion of cumulatively fair load-balancing algorithms where in any interval of consecutive time steps, the total number of tokens sent out over an edge by a node is the same (up to constants) for all adjacent edges. We prove that algorithms which are cumulatively fair and where every node retains a sufficient part of its load in each step, achieve a discrepancy of $O(\min\{d\sqrt{\log n/\mu},d\sqrt{n}\})$ in time $O(T)$. We also show that in general neither of these assumptions may be omitted without increasing discrepancy. We then show by a combinatorial potential reduction argument that any cumulatively fair scheme satisfying some additional assumptions achieves a discrepancy of $O(d)$ almost as quickly as the continuous diffusion process. This positive result applies to some of the simplest and most natural discrete load balancing schemes., Comment: minor corrections; updated literature overview

In the Palindrome Problem one tries to find all palindromes (palindromic substrings) in a given string. A palindrome is defined as a string which reads forwards the same as backwards, e.g., the string "racecar". A related problem is the Longest Palindromic Substring Problem in which finding an arbitrary one of the longest palindromes in the given string suffices. We regard the streaming version of both problems. In the streaming model the input arrives over time and at every point in time we are only allowed to use sublinear space. The main algorithms in this paper are the following: The first one is a one-pass randomized algorithm that solves the Palindrome Problem. It has an additive error and uses $O(\sqrt n$) space. The second algorithm is a two-pass algorithm which determines the exact locations of all longest palindromes. It uses the first algorithm as the first pass. The third algorithm is again a one-pass randomized algorithm, which solves the Longest Palindromic Substring Problem. It has a multiplicative error using only $O(\log(n))$ space. We also give two variants of the first algorithm which solve other related practical problems.

We consider a modified random walk which uses unvisited edges whenever possible, and makes a simple random walk otherwise. We call such a walk an edge-process. We assume there is a rule A, which tells the walk which unvisited edge to use whenever there is a choice. In the simplest case, A is a uniform random choice over unvisited edges incident with the current walk position. However we do not exclude arbitrary choices of rule A. For example, the rule could be determined on-line by an adversary, or could vary from vertex to vertex. For even degree expander graphs, of bounded maximum degree, we have the following result. Let G be an n vertex even degree expander graph, for which every vertex is in at least one vertex induced cycle of length L. Any edge-process on G has cover time (n+ (n log n)/L). This result is independent of the rule A used to select the order of the unvisited edges, which can be chosen on-line by an adversary. As an example, With high probability, random r-regular graphs, (r at least 4, even), are expanders for which L = Omega(log n). Thus, for almost all such graphs, the vertex cover time of the edge-process is Theta(n). This improves the vertex cover time of such graphs by a factor of log n, compared to the Omega(n log n) cover time of any weighted random walk., Comment: 13 pages, 1 figure

In this paper we consider neighborhood load balancing in the context of selfish clients. We assume that a network of n processors and m tasks is given. The processors may have different speeds and the tasks may have different weights. Every task is controlled by a selfish user. The objective of the user is to allocate his/her task to a processor with minimum load. We revisit the concurrent probabilistic protocol introduced in [6], which works in sequential rounds. In each round every task is allowed to query the load of one randomly chosen neighboring processor. If that load is smaller the task will migrate to that processor with a suitably chosen probability. Using techniques from spectral graph theory we obtain upper bounds on the expected convergence time towards approximate and exact Nash equilibria that are significantly better than the previous results in [6]. We show results for uniform tasks on non-uniform processors and the general case where the tasks have different weights and the machines have speeds. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first results for this general setting., Comment: 29 pages, submitted to STACS 2012

The study of {\em balls-into-bins processes} or {\em occupancy problems} has a long history. These processes can be used to translate realistic problems into mathematical ones in a natural way. In general, the goal of a balls-into-bins process is to allocate a set of independent objects (tasks, jobs, balls) to a set of resources (servers, bins, urns) and, thereby, to minimize the maximum load. In this paper, we analyze the maximum load for the {\em chains-into-bins} problem, which is defined as follows. There are $n$ bins, and $m$ objects to be allocated. Each object consists of balls connected into a chain of length $\ell$, so that there are $m \ell$ balls in total. We assume the chains cannot be broken, and that the balls in one chain have to be allocated to $\ell$ consecutive bins. We allow each chain $d$ independent and uniformly random bin choices for its starting position. The chain is allocated using the rule that the maximum load of any bin receiving a ball of that chain is minimized. We show that, for $d \ge 2$ and $m\cdot\ell=O(n)$, the maximum load is $((\ln \ln m)/\ln d) +O(1)$ with probability $1-\tilde O(1/m^{d-1})$.

Imitating successful behavior is a natural and frequently applied approach to trust in when facing scenarios for which we have little or no experience upon which we can base our decision. In this paper, we consider such behavior in atomic congestion games. We propose to study concurrent imitation dynamics that emerge when each player samples another player and possibly imitates this agents' strategy if the anticipated latency gain is sufficiently large. Our main focus is on convergence properties. Using a potential function argument, we show that our dynamics converge in a monotonic fashion to stable states. In such a state none of the players can improve its latency by imitating somebody else. As our main result, we show rapid convergence to approximate equilibria. At an approximate equilibrium only a small fraction of agents sustains a latency significantly above or below average. In particular, imitation dynamics behave like fully polynomial time approximation schemes (FPTAS). Fixing all other parameters, the convergence time depends only in a logarithmic fashion on the number of agents. Since imitation processes are not innovative they cannot discover unused strategies. Furthermore, strategies may become extinct with non-zero probability. For the case of singleton games, we show that the probability of this event occurring is negligible. Additionally, we prove that the social cost of a stable state reached by our dynamics is not much worse than an optimal state in singleton congestion games with linear latency function. Finally, we discuss how the protocol can be extended such that, in the long run, dynamics converge to a Nash equilibrium., Comment: 28 pages, 1 figure

This paper studies broadcasting and gossiping algorithms in random and general AdHoc networks. Our goal is not only to minimise the broadcasting and gossiping time, but also to minimise the energy consumption, which is measured in terms of the total number of messages (or transmissions) sent. We assume that the nodes of the network do not know the network, and that they can only send with a fixed power, meaning they can not adjust the areas sizes that their messages cover. We believe that under these circumstances the number of transmissions is a very good measure for the overall energy consumption. For random networks, we present a broadcasting algorithm where every node transmits at most once. We show that our algorithm broadcasts in $O(\log n)$ steps, w.h.p, where $n$ is the number of nodes. We then present a $O(d \log n)$ ($d$ is the expected degree) gossiping algorithm using $O(\log n)$ messages per node. For general networks with known diameter $D$, we present a randomised broadcasting algorithm with optimal broadcasting time $O(D \log (n/D) + \log^2 n)$ that uses an expected number of $O(\log^2 n / \log (n/D))$ transmissions per node. We also show a tradeoff result between the broadcasting time and the number of transmissions: we construct a network such that any oblivious algorithmusing a time-invariant distribution requires $\Omega(\log^2 n / \log (n/D))$ messages per node in order to finish broadcasting in optimal time. This demonstrates the tightness of our upper bound. We also show that no oblivious algorithm can complete broadcasting w.h.p. using $o(\log n)$ messages per node., Comment: 15 pages. 1 figure

Suppose that a set of $m$ tasks are to be shared as equally as possible amongst a set of $n$ resources. A game-theoretic mechanism to find a suitable allocation is to associate each task with a ``selfish agent'', and require each agent to select a resource, with the cost of a resource being the number of agents to select it. Agents would then be expected to migrate from overloaded to underloaded resources, until the allocation becomes balanced. Recent work has studied the question of how this can take place within a distributed setting in which agents migrate selfishly without any centralized control. In this paper we discuss a natural protocol for the agents which combines the following desirable features: It can be implemented in a strongly distributed setting, uses no central control, and has good convergence properties. For $m\gg n$, the system becomes approximately balanced (an $\epsilon$-Nash equilibrium) in expected time $O(\log\log m)$. We show using a martingale technique that the process converges to a perfectly balanced allocation in expected time $O(\log\log m+n^4)$. We also give a lower bound of $\Omega(\max\{\log\log m,n\})$ for the convergence time.

This paper studies a resource allocation problem introduced by Koutsoupias and Papadimitriou. The scenario is modelled as a multiple-player game in which each player selects one of a finite number of known resources. The cost to the player is the total weight of all players who choose that resource, multiplied by the ``delay'' of that resource. Recent papers have studied the Nash equilibria and social optima of this game in terms of the $L_\infty$ cost metric, in which the social cost is taken to be the maximum cost to any player. We study the $L_1$ variant of this game, in which the social cost is taken to be the sum of the costs to the individual players, rather than the maximum of these costs. We give bounds on the size of the coordination ratio, which is the ratio between the social cost incurred by selfish behavior and the optimal social cost; we also study the algorithmic problem of finding optimal (lowest-cost) assignments and Nash Equilibria. Additionally, we obtain bounds on the ratio between alternative Nash equilibria for some special cases of the problem., Comment: 19 pages