Search

Background: Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) is responsible for terminating cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signalling. PDE4 inhibitors, such as roflumilast (RFM), have anti-inflammatory activity and have been studied in inflammation-induced tissue damage in sepsis. However, the role of RFM on cardiovascular derangements induced by sepsis is still unknown. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the potential effects of RFM on cardiovascular collapse and multiorgan damage caused by sepsis., Methods: Sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) in male rats. Six hours after the CLP or sham procedure, animals were randomly assigned to receive either RFM (0.3 mg/kg) or vehicle subcutaneously, and cardiovascular parameters were assessed 24 h after the surgery and organ/plasma samples were collected for further analyses., Results: Sepsis induced hypotension, tachycardia, reduced renal blood flow (RBF) and hyporeactivity to vasoconstrictors both in vivo and ex vivo. RFM treatment increased systemic cAMP levels and RBF. RFM also attenuated hypoperfusion and liver damage induced by CLP. Furthermore, RFM reduced systemic nitric oxide (NO) levels in septic rats, while there were no changes in hepatic NOS-2 expression. Nevertheless, RFM exacerbated sepsis-induced hypotension and tachycardia without ameliorating vascular hyporeactivity., Conclusion: Our data show that PDE-4 inhibition protects septic rats from hepatic injury and improves renal perfusion. However, RFM worsened hemodynamic parameters and showed no protection against sepsis-induced cardiovascular dysfunction and mortality. Thus, despite the anti-inflammatory benefits of RFM, its application in sepsis should be approached cautiously., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest or disclosures to report., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is characterized by low cytotoxic lymphocytes, abundant immune-suppressive cells, and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Preclinical PDA models showed the HDAC inhibitor entinostat reduced myeloid cell immunosuppression, sensitizing tumors to ICI therapy. This phase II study combined entinostat with nivolumab (PD1 inhibitor) in patients with advanced PDA (NCT03250273). Patients received entinostat 5 mg orally once weekly for 14-day lead-in, followed by entinostat and nivolumab. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included safety, duration of response, progression free-survival and overall survival. Between November 2017 and November 2020, 27 evaluable patients were enrolled. Three showed partial responses (11% ORR, 95% CI, 2.4%-29.2%) with a median response duration of 10.2 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were, respectively, 1.89 (95% CI, 1.381-2.301) and 2.729 (95% CI, 1.841-5.622) months. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19 patients (63%), including decreased lymphocyte count, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and hyponatremia. As exploratory analysis, peripheral and tumor immune profiles changes were assessed using CyTOF, mIHC, and RNA-seq. Entinostat increased dendritic cell activation and maturation. Gene expression analysis revealed an enrichment in inflammatory response pathways with combination treatment. Although the primary endpoint was not met, entinostat and nivolumab showed durable responses in a small subset of PDA patients. Myeloid cell immunomodulation supported the preclinical hypothesis, providing a basis for future combinatorial therapies to enhance clinical benefits in PDA., Competing Interests: Competing interests M.B. served on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Incyte. C.B.B is an employee of, and holds equity in, Akoya Biosciences, Inc. W.J.H. reports patent royalties from Rodeo/Amgen; grants from Sanofi, NeoTX, and Riboscience; speaking/travel honoraria from Exelixis and Standard BioTools. MY receives grant/research support (to Johns Hopkins) from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Incyte, and Genentech; receives honoraria from Genentech, Exelixis, AstraZeneca, Replimune, Hepion, Lantheus; MY is the co-inventor of patents pertaining to cancer vaccines and is a cofounder with equity of Adventris Pharmaceuticals, all outside of the submitted work. E.J.F is on the scientific advisory board for Resistance Bio, has consulted for Merck and Mestag Therapeutics, and receives research grants from Roche/Genetech and Abbvie Inc. L.M.C. has received reagent support from Cell Signaling Technologies, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc., ZielBio, Inc., and Hibercell, Inc.; holds sponsored research agreements with Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Hibercell, Inc., Prospect Creek Foundation, Lustgarten Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Susan G. Komen Foundation, and the National Foundation for Cancer Research; is on the Advisory Board for Dispatch Biotherapeutics, Carisma Therapeutics, Inc., CytomX Therapeutics, Inc., Shasqi, Kineta, Inc., Hibercell, Inc., Cell Signaling Technologies, Inc., Alkermes, Inc., Raska Pharma, Inc., NextCure, Guardian Bio, AstraZeneca Partner of Choice Network (OHSU Site Leader), Genenta Sciences, Pio Therapeutics Pty Ltd., and Lustgarten Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research Therapeutics Working Group, Inc. E.J. reports other support from Abmeta, other support from Adventris, personal fees from Achilles, personal fees from DragonFly, non-financial support from Parker Institute, personal fees from Surge, grants from Lustgarten, grants from Genentech, personal fees from Mestag, personal fees from Medical Home Group, non-financial support from BMS, grants from Break Through Cancer, personal fees from CPRIT, personal fees from Neuvogen, non-financial support from HDT Bio, and personal fees from NeoTx outside the submitted work. N.S.A. receives grant/research support (to Johns Hopkins) from Bristol-Myers Squibb. L.D., J.N.D., L.C., D.N.S., J.A.T., S.C., N.G., A.H., C.T., R.W., J.L., S.M., B.C., A.S., D.A.G., S.Y. declare no competing interest related to this study., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The nonrandomized phase II study by Ding et al. explored the combination of azacitidine and chidamide with or without GemOx chemotherapy in relapsed/refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma and demonstrated that the dual epigenetic therapy is safe and efficacious, particularly in the angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma subset. 1 Further investigation into adding chemotherapy is warranted, building on the promising results seen in this trial., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests Y.W. declares research funding (to institution) from Incyte, InnoCare, LOXO Oncology, Eli Lilly, MorphoSys, Novartis, Genentech, Genmab, AbbVie, BeiGene, and Merck; advisory board membership (compensation to institution) for Eli Lilly, LOXO Oncology, TG Therapeutics, Incyte, InnoCare, Kite, Jansen, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, Genmab, and AbbVie; consultancy fees (compensation to institution) from InnoCare, AbbVie; and honorarium (to institution) from Kite., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Novel abortive treatments for migraine, ditans and gepants, have promising implications in triptan-insufficient responders with minimal existing comparative data. Our study aims to synthesize evidence through a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess the comparative efficacy of lasmiditan, rimegepant and ubrogepant in triptan-insufficient responders., Method: We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and EBSCO Open Dissertations up to May 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared novel abortive treatments, including lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant, in migraine patients who self-reported insufficient response to triptans. Outcomes are represented using relative risks with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank each medication., Results: A total of five phase 3 RCTs involving 3,004 patients were included in the analysis. All three agents were significantly superior to placebo for two-hour pain freedom (RR = 1.93, 95% CI [1.52, 2.46]), freedom from the most bothersome symptoms at two hours (RR = 1.55, 95% CI [1.37, 1.75]), and pain relief at two hours (RR = 1.46, 95% CI [1.35, 1.58]). No statistically significant differences in efficacy outcomes were observed among the three agents. However, lasmiditan 200 mg had the highest cumulative probability for two-hour pain freedom and relief (SUCRA 0.9, 0.8, respective), while rimegepant led in relieving the most bothersome symptoms (SUCRA 0.7)., Conclusion: Lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant are effective for acute treatment of migraine in triptan-insufficient responders, with high-dose lasmiditan showing the highest efficacy for pain control., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are prototypical epigenetic malignancies with invariably poor prognoses. Novel and effective therapeutic strategies are needed to improve clinical outcomes, particularly in relapsed/refractory patients., Methods: We conducted a multicenter phase 2 study to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of azacitidine and chidamide, alone or in combination with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GemOx), in patients with relapsed/refractory PTCLs (registration number: ChiCTR2000037232). The primary endpoint was the best overall response rate., Findings: As of May 1st, 2024, thirty patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. The best overall response rate was 53.3%, meeting its primary endpoint. Among the patients with angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (AITL; N = 19), a numerically higher response rate was observed, regardless of whether chemotherapy was combined, compared to patients with non-AITL. After a median follow-up of 36.6 months, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.1 and 8.7 months, respectively. Patients with AITL who received combination chemotherapy (N = 12) achieved the most promising response rates (overall response rate, 91.7%; complete remission rate, 66.7%) and survival outcomes (median progression-free survival, 17.2 months; median overall survival, 38.8 months). The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (40.0%) and thrombocytopenia (30.0%)., Conclusions: The combination of epigenetic therapy with GemOx was well tolerated and highly effective in patients with relapsed/refractory PTCLs. Patients with AITL, in particular, may benefit more from this combination treatment and should be the focus of future studies., Funding: This work was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20232039)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The development of resistance to current standard-of-care treatments, such as androgen receptor (AR) targeting therapies, remains a major challenge in the management of advanced prostate cancer. There is an urgent need for new therapeutic strategies targeting key resistant drivers, such as AR variants like AR-V7, and steroidogenic enzymes, such as aldo-keto reductase 1C3 (AKR1C3), to overcome drug resistance and improve outcomes for patients with advanced prostate cancer. Here, we have designed, synthesized, and characterized a novel class of LX compounds targeting both the AR/AR variants and AKR1C3 pathways. Molecular docking and in vitro studies demonstrated that LX compounds bind to the AKR1C3 active sites and inhibit AKR1C3 enzymatic activity. LX compounds were also shown to reduce AR/AR-V7 expression and to inhibit their target gene signaling. LX1 inhibited the conversion of androstenedione into testosterone in tumor-based ex vivo enzyme assays. In addition, LX1 inhibited the growth of cells resistant to antiandrogens including enzalutamide (Enza), abiraterone, apalutamide, and darolutamide in vitro. A synergistic effect was observed when LX1 was combined with antiandrogens and taxanes, indicating the potential for this combination in treating resistant prostate cancer. Treatment with LX1 significantly decreased tumor volume, serum PSA levels, as well as reduced intratumoral testosterone levels, without affecting mouse body weight. Furthermore, LX1 was found to overcome resistance to Enza treatment, and its combination with Enza further suppressed tumor growth in both the CWR22Rv1 xenograft and LuCaP35CR patient-derived xenograft models. Collectively, the dual effect of LX1 in reducing AR signaling and intratumoral testosterone, along with its synergy with standard therapies in resistant models, underscores its potential as a valuable treatment option for advanced prostate cancer. Significance: LX1 simultaneously targets androgen receptor variants and the steroidogenic enzyme AKR1C3, offering a promising approach to combat drug resistance and enhancing therapeutic efficacy in conjunction with standard treatments for advanced prostate cancer., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Aims: Tumor fatty acid (FA) metabolic plasticity plays a pivotal role in resistance to therapy and poses limitations to anticancer strategies. In this study, our aim is to uncover the role of acetate metabolism in neurodifferentiation (NED)-mediated castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)., Methods: We conducted analyses using LC-MS/MS on clinical prostate cancer tissue before and after hormone therapy. We established tumor xenograft mouse models, primary tumor cells, and human-derived organoids to detect the novel mechanism of NED and to identify potential therapies., Results: The hormone therapy-induced upregulation of acetate metabolism was mediated by acyl-CoA synthetase short-chain family member 2 (ACSS2), which increased c-MYC expression for NED induction. Notably, combined treatment with an ACSS2 inhibitor and enzalutamide significantly reduced the xenograft tumor volume., Conclusion: Our findings uncovered the critical role of acetate metabolism in NED-mediated CRPC and suggest that ACSS2 inhibitors may represent a novel, low-toxicity strategy when combined with hormone therapy for treating patients with NED-mediated CRPC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Huan Xu reports financial support was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China. Huan Xu reports financial support was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China. Huan Xu reports financial support was provided by Shanghai Sailing Program. Zhong Wang reports financial support was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions represent rare somatic mutations in many types of cancer and have enabled the use of promising targeted therapies. In clinical studies, increased response rates to tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors have been demonstrated in NTRK fusion-positive cancer types; however, real-world experiences on these targeted agents are scarce., Objective: We evaluated the clinical characteristics and treatment responses of NTRK fusion-positive patients who received entrectinib treatment within the scope of an early access program in Turkey., Patients and Methods: This multicenter, retrospective analysis involved 17 patients with solid tumors harboring NTRK fusions or rearrangements from 14 oncology centers between June 2019 and 31 March 2024. Demographic and clinical data were obtained via retrospective review of medical records with a cutoff date of 31 March 2024., Results: The median age at diagnosis of the patients in our study was 42 [interquartile range (IQR) 33-60] years. Nine different types of solid tumors were diagnosed in these patients. The most common NTRK gene rearrangements involved NTRK1 (n = 8), followed by NTRK3 (n = 7). The median duration of entrectinib usage was 6.9 (IQR 3.1-16.1) months. Dose reductions due to side effects were performed in four patients: two due to leukopenia, one due to visual disturbance, and one due to troponin elevation. Leukopenia was the most commonly observed side effect. The objective response rate (ORR) was 35.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.2-62.7), with complete response (CR) achieved in four patients. The duration of response (DOR) in patients who responded after initiating entrectinib was 9.8 (95% CI 0-30.7) months, the median overall survival (mOS) in all patients was 20.8 (95% CI 0-48.5) months, and the time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was 6.4 (95% CI 0-13.5) months., Conclusions: In this retrospective study, we aimed to obtain real-world data concerning the use of entrectinib in patients with solid tumors harboring NTRK fusion genes. Although our findings are partially similar to the results of clinical studies, prospective studies in larger patient groups with more diverse tumor types and different demographic characteristics are needed to confirm the findings., Competing Interests: Declarations Funding The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Conflict of interest statement Feride Yılmaz, Serkan Yaşar, Nil Molinas Mandel, Turgut Kaçan, Melek Özdemir, Gamze Gököz Doğu, Nilay Şengül, Nezih Meydan, Fatma Buğdaycı Başal, Pınar Kubilay Tolunay, Melda Berber Hamamcı, Oğuz Salih Dinçer, Aykut Bahçeci, Leyla Özer, Miraç Ajredini, Önder Kırca, Özlem Yersal, Orçun Can, Meral Günaldı, Gökhan Demir, and Şuayib Yalçın declare that they have no conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this article. Ethics declarations The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments and with Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Ethical approval (approval date and number 2 April 2024, 23/536) for this study was obtained from the Hacettepe University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, Turkey. Consent to participate The need for consent for this study was waived by the institutional review board (Hacettepe University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board) because of its retrospective design. Consent to publish Not applicable. Availability of data and materials Since the participants in this retrospective study, which was conducted with the permission of the Hacettepe Health Sciences Ethics Committee, did not give written consent for their data to be disclosed to the public, supporting data are not available owing to the sensitive nature of the research. Code availability Not applicable. Author contributions Feride Yilmaz: conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; validation; visualization; writing—original draft. Nil Molinas Mandel, Turgut Kaçan, Melek Özdemir, Gamze Gököz Doğu, Oğuz Salih Dinçer, Leyla Özer, Miraç Ajredini, Önder Kırca, Özlem Yersal: conceptualization; data curation; investigation; methodology; validation; visualization. Serkan Yaşar and Şuayib Yalçın: conceptualization; data curation; methodology; writing, review and editing. Nilay Şengül Samancı, Nezih Meydan, Fatma Buğdaycı Başal, Pınar Kubilay Tolunay, Melda Berber Hamamcı: conceptualization; data curation; methodology; supervision; writing, review and editing. Aykut Bahçeci, Orçun Can, Meral Günaldı, Gökhan Demir: conceptualization; methodology; supervision; validation; review and editing. Şuayib Yalçın: conceptualization; data curation; methodology; supervision; validation; review and editing., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

This report focuses on part 3 of a multicenter, open-label, phase 1 study (NCT03198650) assessing the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and antitumor activity of acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab in Japanese patients with treatment-naive (TN) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ten patients were included; median age was 68 years. With a median treatment duration of 27.2 months, treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients (grade ≥3, 70%), and the most common AEs were anemia and headache (40% each). One patient had a grade 4 AE of neutropenia (the only dose-limiting toxicity). PK results suggested no marked effects of concomitant obinutuzumab treatment on the exposure of acalabrutinib. PD assessment indicated that combination therapy provided >98% Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) occupancy. Overall response rate (ORR) was 100% with median duration of response (DoR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) not reached. Treatment with acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab was generally safe and efficacious in adult Japanese patients with TN CLL.

Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors play an important role in targeted treatment of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. However, adverse events may limit the proper course of treatment in many patients. The purpose of this study is to compare the risk of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular adverse events in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small cell lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) treated with the first-generation BTK inhibitor ibrutinib versus second-generation acalabrutinib, using real-world data from a collaborative multinational network. We used data from the network (TriNetX), which encompasses more than 100 healthcare organizations worldwide. We queried the database for patients aged ≥ 18 years with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small-cell lymphomas treated with ibrutinib or acalabrutinib in the past ten years before the analysis. We used propensity score matching to balance the cohorts. The 3-year cumulative incidences and hazard ratios for the following outcomes were calculated: atrial flutter or fibrillation, other arrhythmias, heart failure, ischemic stroke or peripheral embolism, acute coronary syndrome, bleeding, and sepsis. We compared 2,107 patients in each group. Atrial fibrillation or flutter occurred in 150 (7.1%) patients with acalabrutinib and 310 (14.7%) patients with ibrutinib during the 3-year follow-up (hazard ratio, 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.84). New-onset hypertension occurred in 342 (16.3%) patients in the acalabrutinib group and 584 (27.7%) patients in the ibrutinib group (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.98). Sepsis was diagnosed in 136 (6.5%) patients in the acalabrutinib group versus 239 (11.3%) patients in the ibrutinib group (hazard ratio 0.77, 95 CI 0.60-0.98). The two groups had no significant differences concerning the other adverse events. In a large retrospective cohort using real-world data from electronic medical registers, patients with CLL or SLL treated with acalabrutinib had a better cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular safety profile than those treated with ibrutinib, with lower risks of atrial flutter or fibrillation, new-onset arterial hypertension, and sepsis., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Previously, we reported the efficacy and safety of tazemetostat in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) harboring the EZH2 mutation in a multicenter, open-label, phase II study. Here, we present a follow-up analysis of tazemetostat at a long-term median follow-up of 35.0 months. Twenty patients were enrolled: 17 in the FL cohort and three in the DLBCL cohort. In the FL cohort, the objective response rate was 70.6%, consistent with the primary analysis, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached. The 24-month and 36-month PFS rates were 72.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 41.5%-88.6%) and 64.1% (95% CI 33.7%-83.4%), respectively. The median duration of treatment was 30.2 months. After the primary analysis at a median follow-up of 12.9 months, grade 1-2 urinary tract infection, peripheral motor neuropathy, and hypogammaglobulinemia newly emerged, but the incidence of adverse events (AEs) did not increase notably during this follow-up period. No unexpected grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs were reported. Long-term oral monotherapy with tazemetostat showed favorable efficacy and safety profiles, indicating that it may be a useful third-line or later treatment option for patients with relapsed/refractory FL harboring the EZH2 mutation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03456726., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: Although tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has markedly improved the survival of people with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), 20% to 30% of people still experienced therapy failure. Data from 1955 consecutive patients with chronic-phase CML diagnosed by the European LeukemiaNet recommendations from 1 center receiving initial imatinib or a second-generation (2G) TKI therapy were interrogated to develop a clinical prediction model for TKI-therapy failure. This model was subsequently validated in 3454 patients from 76 other centers. Using the predictive clinical covariates associated with TKI-therapy failure, we developed a model that stratified patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk subgroups with significantly different cumulative incidences of therapy failure (P < .001). There was good discrimination and calibration in the external validation data set, and the performance was consistent with that of the training data set. Our model had the better prediction discrimination than the Sokal and European Treatment and Outcome Study long-term survival scores, with the greater time-dependent area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve values and a better ability to redefine the risk of therapy failure. Our model could help physicians estimate the likelihood of initial imatinib or 2G TKI-therapy failure in people with chronic-phase CML., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Abstract: DNA methyltransferase inhibitor decitabine plus anti-programmed cell death 1 (DP) therapy was effective in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, a subset of patients experienced primary resistance or relapse/progression after DP therapy. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a triplet regimen consisting of the histone deacetylase inhibitor chidamide, decitabine, and anti-PD-1 camrelizumab (CDP) in 52 patients who previously received DP therapy. CDP treatment was well tolerated and resulted in an objective response rate of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84-99), with 50% (95% CI, 36-64) of patients achieving complete response (CR). Notably, all patients who were recalcitrant to previous DP treatment exhibited therapeutic responses after CDP therapy, although their CR rate was lower than patients responsive to prior DP. Overall, the median progression-free survival was 29.4 months. Through single-cell RNA sequencing of pretreatment and on-treatment cHL tumor biopsy samples, we observed the heterogeneity of rare malignant Hodgkin Reed/Sternberg (HRS)-like cells. The classical CD30+ HRS-like cells interacted with abundant immunosuppressive IL21+CD4+ T helper cells, forming a positive feedback loop that supported their survival. While the CD30- HRS-like cell population showed potential resistance to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. CDP treatment promoted the activation of diverse tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells and suppressed the proliferation of IL21+CD4+ T cells by inhibiting STAT1/3 signaling, thereby alleviating their immunosuppressive effects. These findings provide insights into the cHL microenvironment that contributes to anti-PD-1 resistance and highlight the therapeutic effectiveness of dual epi-immunotherapy in overcoming immunotherapy resistance. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04233294., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Purpose: To determine new-onset or worsening T2DM risk in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving abiraterone acetate (AA) vs. enzalutamide (ENZA) in England., Methods: Records of patients on AA and/or ENZA (2015-2021) were analysed retrospectively from UK- or England-wide databases and data sets. The primary endpoint was new-onset or worsening T2DM, analysed using a Cox model., Results: Of 1382 patients, 84 (6.1%) met the primary endpoint; 42 of 826 patients (5.1%) received ENZA and 42 of 556 patients (7.6%) received AA. Among patients without baseline T2DM (n = 1049), 50 developed new-onset T2DM: 24 (3.9%) on ENZA and 26 (5.9%) on AA. Among patients with baseline T2DM (n = 333), 34 (10.2%) had worsening T2DM: 18 (8.3%) on ENZA and 16 (13.8%) on AA. Patients on ENZA had longer median follow-up (445 vs. 408 days) and treatment duration (164 vs. 139 days) than those on AA, who were also more likely to have new-onset or worsening T2DM than those on ENZA (HR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.4-2.7; P = 0.0101). The number needed to harm for an additional patient to experience new-onset or worsening T2DM when receiving AA instead of ENZA was 40 overall, 50 in patients without baseline T2DM, and 18 in patients with baseline T2DM., Conclusion: Patients with mCRPC receiving AA were more likely to experience new-onset or worsening T2DM than those on ENZA, despite having a shorter treatment duration. Further research is required to substantiate these findings in earlier disease settings with longer treatment duration., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Several lung function endpoints are utilized in clinical trials of inhaled bronchodilators for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) is a commonly reported endpoint in COPD trials and can be complemented by area under the FEV 1 vs time curve (FEV 1 AUC), which provides information on duration and consistency of bronchodilation over a dosing interval. Revefenacin, a once-daily bronchodilator, significantly improved lung function in patients with COPD when measured by trough FEV 1 in two replicate Phase 3 trials. Here, we report an FEV 1 AUC substudy using data from these trials., Patients and Methods: This post hoc analysis examined substudy data from 12-week replicate Phase 3 trials (NCT02459080/NCT02512510); patients with moderate to very severe COPD were randomized 1:1 to revefenacin 175 μg or placebo once daily. The substudy patients had FEV 1 AUC 0-2h assessed on Day 1, and those who continued to Day 84 also underwent 24-hour serial spirometry postdose where FEV 1 AUC 0-2h, AUC 0-12h , AUC 12-24h , and AUC 0-24h were evaluated., Results: Fifty and 47 patients who received revefenacin and placebo underwent 24-hour serial spirometry; most baseline characteristics were aligned between groups. At Day 84 postdose, revefenacin demonstrated sustained improvements in bronchodilation over 24 hours; differences in least squares mean vs placebo were 282, 220, 205, and 212 mL for FEV 1 AUC 0-2h , AUC 0-12h , AUC 12-24h , and AUC 0-24h (all P <0.001), respectively., Conclusion: This substudy analysis supplements previous findings that revefenacin provides sustained bronchodilation over 24 hours. Assessing additional complementary COPD clinical trial endpoints can help clinicians make treatment decisions., Competing Interests: Corey J. Witenko is a current employee of Theravance Biopharma US, Inc. and owns stock. Melinda K. Lacy is a current employee of Theravance Biopharma US, Inc. and owns stock. Ann W. Olmsted is a paid consultant for Theravance Biopharma US, Inc. and owns stock. Edmund J. Moran is a current employee of Theravance Biopharma US, Inc. and owns stock. In addition, Edmund J. Moran has a patent US11484531 licensed to Viatris. Donald A. Mahler serves on the advisory boards of AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Theravance, Verona, and Viatris and receives royalties from pharmaceutical companies (Elpen Pharmaceutical Company and University of Aberdeen) for the use of baseline dyspnea index/transition dyspnea index. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2024 LeMaster et al.)

The antiviral drug tecovirimat* has been used extensively to treat U.S. mpox cases since the start of a global outbreak in 2022. Mutations in the mpox viral protein target (F13 or VP37) that occur during treatment can result in resistance to tecovirimat † (1,2). CDC and public health partners have conducted genetic surveillance of monkeypox virus (MPXV) for F13 mutations through sequencing and monitoring of public databases. MPXV F13 mutations associated with resistance have been reported since 2022, typically among severely immunocompromised mpox patients who required prolonged courses of tecovirimat (3-5). A majority of patients with infections caused by MPXV with resistant mutations had a history of tecovirimat treatment; however, spread of tecovirimat-resistant MPXV was reported in California during late 2022 to early 2023 among persons with no previous tecovirimat treatment (3). This report describes a second, unrelated cluster of tecovirimat-resistant MPXV among 18 persons with no previous history of tecovirimat treatment in multiple states., Competing Interests: All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Todd G. Smith reports that SIGA Technologies, the owner of TPOXX, provided the drug used in the study under a material transfer agreement. Nicole M. Green reports serving as president of the Southern California Society for Microbiology. Daisy McGrath reports support from the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education. Meilan Bielby reports unpaid membership on the Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) Infectious Disease and Public Health Preparedness committees. Danielle Haydel reports institutional support from APHL to attend the APHL conference. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Purpose: Retinal ischemia-reperfusion (RIR) injury is implicated in various retinal diseases, leading to retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) degeneration. Microglial senescence exacerbates inflammation, contributing to neurodegeneration. This study aimed to investigate the potential therapeutic role of Roflumilast (Roflu) in ameliorating microglial senescence and neuroinflammation following RIR injury., Methods: C57BL/6J mice underwent RIR surgery, and Roflu treatment was administered intraperitoneally. BV2 microglial cells were subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation and reoxygenation (OGD/R) to simulate ischemic conditions in vitro. SA-β-gal staining was used to detect cellular senescence. Quantitative PCR and ELISA were used to examine the levels of senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) factors. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed on retinal sections to assess retinal morphology and thickness. Surviving RGCs were labeled and quantified in retinal whole-mounts using immunofluorescence (IF). Furthermore, Western blot and IF staining were used to quantify the proteins associated with the cell cycle and NLRP3 inflammasomes., Results: Roflu treatment reduced microglial senescence, ROS production, and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines in OGD/R-exposed BV2 cells. It also restored cell proliferation capacity and reversed OGD/R-induced cell cycle arrest. In vivo, Roflu alleviated retinal senescence, preserved retinal thickness, and protected against RGCs death in the RIR mouse model. Mechanistically, Roflu inhibited the NLRP3 inflammasome activation and suppressed DNA damage signaling pathway in microglia., Conclusions: Roflu exerts neuroprotective effects by mitigating microglial senescence and inflammation via inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome in RIR injury. These findings suggest that Roflu may serve as a promising therapeutic strategy for retinal diseases associated with ischemic injury by targeting microglial senescence.

Crizotinib successfully overcomes MET amplification in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC after entrectinib failure.

Background: Inflammatory dermatologic conditions suitable for topical treatments benefit from a hydrating vehicle that improves the skin barrier without irritation., Objective: This research was designed to assess skin barrier effects and aesthetic attributes of the vehicle for topical roflumilast cream (vehicle) vs a currently marketed ceramide-containing moisturizing cream (moisturizer)., Methods: This was a single-site, randomized, intraindividual, double-blind, controlled study conducted over 17 days. Patients (aged 18 years or older) with mild, symmetric asteatotic eczema of the lower extremities were enrolled to receive lower leg applications of the vehicle on one leg and moisturizer on the other. The primary efficacy endpoint was a change in transepidermal water loss (TEWL) from baseline to day 15. Secondary efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in TEWL at other study visits, change from baseline in hydration as assessed via corneometry, and patient- and investigator-rated assessments of the products. Safety and tolerability were also assessed., Results: A total of 40 patients enrolled in the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was met for both treatments. A statistically significant difference in TEWL on day 1 favored the moisturizer, but no difference was seen between vehicle and moisturizer at any other timepoint. Both vehicle and moisturizer also met the secondary efficacy endpoint of change from baseline in hydration., Limitations: The sample size was small., Conclusions: The vehicle for roflumilast cream performed similarly to a leading, currently marketed, dermatologist-recommended, ceramide-containing moisturizer across all patient- and investigator-rated assessments of efficacy, tolerability, and aesthetic properties in patients with mild asteatotic eczema. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(10):834-840. doi:10.36849/JDD.7958 &nbsp.

Background: Capmatinib is a selective MET inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in a phase II study of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring METex14 mutations. However, the real-world outcomes of capmatinib are largely unknown. From June 2019, the French Early Access Program (EAP) provided capmatinib to METex14 NSCLC patients who were ineligible for or for whom first-line standard therapies had failed., Methods: IFCT-2104 CAPMATU was a multicenter study that included all METex14 NSCLC patients who received capmatinib as part of the EAP until August 2021. The primary endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR)., Results: A total of 146 patients were included. The median age was 74.9 years, 56.6 % were never-smokers, and 32.4 % had brain metastases. The median TTF, median PFS and median OS from capmatinib initiation were 5.1 months (95 % CI 4.2-6.0), 4.8 months (95 % CI 4.0-6.0) and 10.4 months (95 % CI 8.3-13.2), respectively. Evaluation of the best response to capmatinib was available for 134 patients and resulted in an ORR of 55.3 % (95 % CI 46.8 %-63.6 %). The median PFS was 7.7 months for treatment-naïve patients and 6.0 and 4.1 months for patients who had received one or 2 + prior lines of treatment, respectively. For patients with brain metastases, the median PFS was 3.0 months. Capmatinib had a known and manageable safety profile, with grade 3 to 4 adverse events, mostly peripheral edema (8.2 %), occurring in 17.8 % of patients., Conclusion: In this large real-world study of METex14 NSCLC patients, the efficacy of capmatinib was confirmed, with a manageable safety profile, even in patients with brain metastases and in those who received several lines of treatment. This study reinforces the key role of capmatinib for these patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: M. Ferreira: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, BMS. A. Swalduz: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, honoraria: AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, BMS, Pfizer, Lilly. P. du Rusquec: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations: Roche, Pfizer, Sandoz, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, Novartis, Lilly, Amgen, Eisai, BMS, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Sanofi. Advisory Role: Sanofi, Takeda. A.C. Toffart: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, Roche, Amgen, Takeda, Jannsen. J. Raimbourg: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: BMS. V. Gounant: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: BMS, AstraZeneca, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Sanofi, Pfizer. S. Couraud: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, honoraria: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, Fabentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, Chugai, Novartis, Pfizer, Sysmex, Cellgene, Takeda, Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Roche, Takeda. M. Wislez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, MSD, Amgen, BMS, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: AstraZeneca, MSD, Amgen, BMS, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, research funding: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, MSD, Amgen, BMS, Roche. C. Descarpentries reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Novartis Pharma SAS, nonfinancial support from Roche SAS, nonfinancial support from Boehringer Ingelheim france, nonfinancial support from Pfizer, outside the submitted work; G. Herbreteau reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Pierre Fabre Oncology. V. Westeel: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: AstraZeneca, BMS, Amgen, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: MSD, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: BMS, AstraZeneca, Sanofi. A. B. Cortot: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting fees: Roche Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Novartis Pfizer Takeda Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche Novartis Pfizer Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: During the ongoing outbreak of clade II monkeypox virus (MPXV), many U.S. patients were prescribed tecovirimat, an antiviral drug that was made available under an expanded access Investigational New Drug (EA-IND) program. We evaluated EA-IND data to summarize characteristics of treated patients, outcomes, and serious adverse events (SAEs)., Methods: We evaluated data from patients prescribed tecovirimat from May 29, 2022, through July 10, 2023. Baseline patient characteristics, clinical courses, and outcomes were evaluated via intake forms, outcome forms, and patient diaries. Data were summarized in aggregate by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status and by comorbidities of special interest. Reported SAEs were also compiled., Results: Tecovirimat was prescribed for over 7100 patients in the United States, most often for lesions in sensitive anatomical areas, such as certain anogenital lesions (83.5%; 5135 out of 6148 patients), and pain (52.5%; 3227 out of 6148 patients). The demographic and clinical characteristics mirrored those of patients worldwide. Among the 7181 patients with returned intake forms, 1626 also had returned outcome forms (22.6%). Many patients with severe immunocompromise (e.g., HIV with CD4 counts <200 cells/μl) received multiple courses of tecovirimat (43.1%; 22 out of 51 patients), including intravenously, and often experienced poor outcomes (35.3%; 18 out of 51 patients). Overall, 223 SAEs and 40 deaths were reported. Most SAEs were among patients who were severely immunocompromised, one of whom experienced hallucinations after tecovirimat was administered at twice the standard dose., Conclusions: Tecovirimat was used extensively. The returned EA-IND data suggest that life-threatening or protracted infections occurred in persons who were severely immunocompromised. SAEs were not commonly reported. The EA-IND data are not definitive; controlled clinical trial data are essential to elucidating if and how tecovirimat should be used.

Background: Chronic inflammatory skin diseases are of great social and medical importance and require effective drug therapy. Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors represent a possible therapeutic option by regulating inflammatory processes. PDEs cause the release of proinflammatory cytokines by interfering with signaling pathways. The PDE4 inhibitors apremilast (treatment of psoriasis and Behçet's disease), roflumilast (treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and crisaborole (treatment of atopic dermatitis) are currently approved in Europe., Psoriasis: Apremilast is used for second-line treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and has a favorable side effect profile. Topical PDE4 inhibitors are currently being researched and have not yet been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA)., Atopic Dermatitis: The topical PDE4 inhibitor crisaborole was approved by the EMA in 2020 as a topical treatment alternative to glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors. Although the substance has shown good tolerability in studies and also alleviates the accompanying itching, it did not find its way onto the German market. BEHçET'S DISEASE: Apremilast is approved for the treatment of Behçet's disease in adults with refractory, severe oral ulcers., Outlook: Case studies have also demonstrated the efficacy of systemic PDE4 inhibition in other skin diseases (including blistering autoimmune dermatoses, lichen planus, and acantholytic genodermatoses). The substances are also being researched and used to treat extracutaneous inflammatory diseases., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as a novel category of medications to treat a variety of immune-mediated conditions. However, limited insight exists regarding the impact of safety concerns on their usage and prescribing practices. Therefore, the objective of this study was to describe the utilization of JAK-inhibitors in Canada, both nationally and within individual provinces. We used data from IQVIA's Compuscript database. We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study of all JAK-inhibitor units dispensed in retail pharmacies (tofacitinib, ruxolitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib) within the ten Canadian provinces from July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2022. Throughout Canada, outpatient pharmacies dispensed an estimated total of 26,126,409 JAK-inhibitor units between 2016 and 2022, averaging 9,431 units dispensed per 100,000 population. All provinces had increasing rates of JAK-inhibitor units dispensed over time, whereby between July 2021 to June 2022, New Brunswick exhibited the highest rates (27,696 units per 100,000), and Prince Edward Island demonstrated the lowest rates (10,065 units per 100,000). In this study, utilization of JAK-inhibitors increased in Canada over the study period, evident at both provincial and national levels. Variability in JAK-inhibitor utilization between provinces underscores the necessity for further investigations to ascertain appropriate usage practices. Key Points • From 2016 to 2022, an estimated total of 26,126,409 JAK-inhibitor units were dispensed in retail pharmacies across Canada, with an average rate of 9,431 units dispensed for every 100,000 people in the population. • Tofacitinib was the most dispensed JAK-inhibitor during the entire study period, making up 76% of all units dispensed. Ruxolitinib, upadacitinib, and baricitinib made up 16%, 7.9%, and 1.1% of the JAK-inhibitor units dispensed, respectively. • The variance in provincial adoption of JAK-inhibitors across Canada might be influenced by several factors, including drug coverage availability, disease prevalence, and physician prescribing patterns., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)

Background: Optimal drug selection for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) remains unclear. We therefore assessed the clinical outcomes of mHSPC treated with new-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARSIs) and identified risk factors associated with the prognosis of mHSPC., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 324 patients with mHSPC who were treated with ARSIs, including abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, and apalutamide, between January 2018 and December 2022. In addition to assessing the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and overall survival (OS) during ARSI treatment, we investigated several potential risk factors for a poor OS in patients with mHSPC., Results: Patients with a ≥ 90% PSA reduction (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.58; P = .002) and those whose PSA declined to ≤ 0.2 ng/mL (HR: 0.22, 95% CI, 0.08-0.63; P = .005) showed significantly better OS than other patients. Gleason grade group 5 (GG5), presence of liver metastasis, and an LDH ≥ 250 U/L were identified as prognostic factors significantly associated with a poor OS, with HRs of 2.31 (95% CI, 1.02-5.20; P = .044), 7.87 (95% CI, 2.61-23.8; P < .001) and 3.21 (95% CI, 1.43-7.23; P = .005)., Conclusion: We identified GG5, the presence of liver metastasis, and elevated LDH at the diagnosis as significant factors predicting the OS of mHSPC, but the choice of ARSIs did not affect the prognosis. The potential prognostic impact of these markers requires further investigation., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with the present study., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Recurrent problems of patients with myelofibrosis (MF) are cytopenias, debiliating disease-related symptoms and splenomegaly. Whereas the latter are usually addressed by the JAK1/2 inhibitors ruxolitinib and fedratinib, cytopenias often remain critical. Momelotinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor recently approved for the treatment of anemic MF patients, was shown to improve anemia via a direct inhibition of activin A receptor type I. In this German-wide, multicenter, retrospective analysis the safety and efficacy profile of momelotinib was evaluated in a real world setting within a cohort of 60 MF patients independent of pre-treatment. The median duration of treatment was 12 weeks. As a new, but manageable safety finding, creatinine increase (CTC°1-2) was detected in 10/60 patients (17%). Interestingly, not only hemoglobin levels increased in 84% of patients, but also platelet values (67%). In the cohort of transfusion-dependent individuals (n = 38), transfusion requirement improved in 15 patients (39%) with 8 reaching transfusion independency (21%). Transfusion independency was achieved within a median of 4 weeks (range 2-12). Spleen size decreased in 13/53 individuals (25%) with a median response time of 6 weeks. Thereof, 11 patients had been pre-treated with JAK inhibitor(s) (85%). Clinical improvement was detected in 24/51 symptomatic individuals (47%) with a median response time of 4 weeks. 5 patients stopped treatment due to side effects (8%), 6 patients due to a worsening of clinical symptoms (10%). Taken together, the MoReLife analysis identifies momelotinib as potent and safe therapeutic option also for heavily pre-treated cytopenic MF patients under real world conditions., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Data from the EMBARK trial demonstrate the potential of enzalutamide monotherapy as an effective treatment for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR) without the side effects of testosterone-lowering therapy. Unfortunately, concerns about gynecomastia and how to manage this treatment-related toxicity have diminished enthusiasm. Existing data may offer an alternative scheduling strategy for enzalutamide monotherapy in BCR., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: Abiraterone and enzalutamide are two androgen receptor pathway inhibitors approved, among others, for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in adult men whose disease has progressed on or after a docetaxel-based regimen. Although hematological effects, especially neutropenia, are one of the main complications of other oral antineoplastic drugs, these adverse effects are infrequent in the case of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors., Case Report: We report the case of a patient diagnosed with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who discontinued an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor due to drug-related grade 4 neutropenia. His control blood counts before enzalutamide starting were normal. After one month of treatment, he developed a grade 4 neutropenia, with complete neutrophil count recovery four weeks later. He underwent a bone marrow aspiration, which revealed normocelullar results, and enzalutamide was restarted. Three weeks later, the treatment was eventually discontinued due to neutropenia reappearance. Neutrophil count recovery was achieved one month later. Then, he started treatment with abiraterone, but two weeks later neutropenia reappeared. Abiraterone was withdrawn, and the patient recovered from neutropenia 2 weeks later., Management and Outcomes: This case exposes not only the occurrence of rare toxicity of two individual drugs but also the description of a probable drug-class adverse event not reported before. The patient recovered from neutropenia after the androgen receptor pathway inhibitor was withdrawn, thereby supporting the diagnosis of probable drug-induced neutropenia., Discussion: There is scarce evidence in the literature concerning androgen receptor pathway inhibitor-related neutropenia. However, its life-threatening potential cannot be ignored, so healthcare professionals should be warned of the possibility of the occurrence of such adverse reactions., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background and Objective: Addition of darolutamide to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and docetaxel significantly improved overall survival (OS) in ARASENS (NCT02799602). Here we report on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses and their association with outcomes., Methods: ARASENS is an international, double-blind, phase 3 study in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) randomized to darolutamide 600 mg orally twice daily (n = 651) or placebo (n = 654), both with ADT + docetaxel. The proportion of patients with undetectable PSA (<0.2 ng/ml) and time to PSA progression (≥25% relative and ≥2 ng/ml absolute increase from nadir) were compared between groups in prespecified exploratory analyses. PSA outcomes by disease volume and the association of undetectable PSA with OS and times to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and PSA progression were assessed in post hoc analyses., Key Findings and Limitations: The proportion of patients with undetectable PSA at any time was more than doubled with darolutamide versus placebo, at 67% versus 29% in the overall population, 62% versus 26% in the high-volume subgroup, and 84% versus 38% in the low-volume subgroup. Darolutamide delayed time to PSA progression versus placebo, with hazard ratios of 0.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.31) in the overall population, 0.30 (95% CI 0.24-0.37) in the high-volume subgroup, and 0.093 (95% CI 0.047-0.18) in the low-volume subgroup. Undetectable PSA at 24 wk was associated with longer OS, with a hazard ratio of 0.49 (95% CI 0.37-0.65) in the darolutamide group, as well as longer times to CRPC and PSA progression, with similar findings in the disease volume subgroups., Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Darolutamide + ADT + docetaxel led to deep and durable PSA responses in patients with high- or low-volume mHSPC. Achievement of undetectable PSA (<0.2 ng/ml) was correlated with better clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: No head-to-head trials had been performed to estimate the relative effectiveness of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) and androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSi) in the first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of various systemic treatment agents for patients with mCRPC., Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted for abstracts and full-text articles from the database's inception through April 27, 2023. The study concentrated on assessing radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) for both overall and homologous recombination repair mutation (HRRm) population, with overall survival (OS) as the secondary measure. Under the Bayesian framework, the overall effect was pooled using the fixed-effects model in base case analysis. Scenario analysis using restricted mean survival time (RMST) methods was performed to test the robustness of the results., Results: Nine studies with 6,830 patients and 8 unique treatment options were included. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide (TALA + ENZA; overall population, hazard ratio [HR], 0.20; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.16-0.26; RMST, 3.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.46-4.60; HRRm population, HR, 0.15; 95% CrI: 0.09-0.23; RMST, 4.14; 95% CI 2.84-5.39) was superior to other treatments in the first-line setting in terms of rPFS. The results of Bayesian framework and RMST models showed consistent efficacy ranks. When extrapolated to overall survival benefit, within the Bayesian framework, olaparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone (OLAP + AAP) achieved the highest OS benefit for the overall population, which was not statistically significant when compared to TALA + ENZA. However, TALA + ENZA achieved the highest OS benefit at 3 years by applying RMST., Conclusions: We suggest that talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide is probably a preferred treatment agent for the overall population and HRRm patients with mCRPC. Given the limitations of network framework and the modeling assumptions undertaken to finalize the analyses, results should be cautiously interpreted., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).)

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the leading cause of cancer‑related death among men worldwide. PCa often develops resistance to standard androgen deprivation therapy and androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors, such as enzalutamide (ENZ). Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop novel therapeutic strategies for this disease. The efficacy of ADA‑308 was evaluated through in vitro assessments of AR activity and cell proliferation, alongside in vivo studies. ADA‑308 has emerged as a promising candidate, demonstrating potent inhibition of AR‑sensitive adenocarcinoma as well as ENZ‑resistant PCa cell lines. The results of the study revealed that ADA‑308 effectively blocked AR activity, including its nuclear localization, and inhibited cell proliferation in vitro . Furthermore, ADA‑308 demonstrated notable efficacy in vivo , with a robust antitumor response in ENZ‑resistant models. These findings establish the role of ADA‑308 as a potent AR inhibitor that overcomes resistance to AR‑targeted therapies and highlights its potential as a novel therapeutic approach in advanced PCa management.

In a recent issue of The Journal of Pathology, Chen and colleagues established novel patient-derived ex vivo models of NTRK fusion-positive soft tissue sarcoma to characterize resistance mechanisms against targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Prolonged exposure to escalating concentrations of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor, entrectinib, ultimately led to the occurrence of resistant clones that harbored an inactivating mutation in the NF2 gene, not previously described in this context, accompanied by increased PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling. Finally, an inhibitor screen identified, among others, MEK and mTOR inhibitors as potential combination agents. © 2024 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland., (© 2024 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Background: Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is one of the most prevalent and severe intestinal emergencies in newborns. The inflammatory activation of macrophages is associated with the intestinal injury of NEC. The neuroimmune regulation mediated by α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7nAChR) plays an important role in regulating macrophage activation and inflammation progression, but in NEC remains unclear. This study aims to explore the effect of macrophage α7nAChR on NEC., Methods: Mice NEC model were conducted with high-osmolarity formula feeding, hypoxia, and cold stimulation. The α7nAChR agonist PNU-282987 and mTOR inhibitor rapamycin were treated by intraperitoneal injections in mice. The expression and distribution of macrophages, α7nAChR, and phospho-mammalian target of rapamycin (p-mTOR) in the intestines of NEC patients and mice was assessed using immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and flow cytometry. The expression of NLRP3, activated caspase-1 and IL-1β in mice intestines was detected by flow cytometry, western blot or ELISA. In vitro, the mouse RAW264.7 macrophage cell line was also cultured followed by various treatments. Expression of p-mTOR, NLRP3, activated caspase-1, and IL-1β in macrophages was determined., Results: Macrophages accumulated in the intestines and the expression of α7nAChR in the mucosal and submucosal layers of the intestines was increased in both the NEC patients and mice. The p-mTOR and CD68 were increased and co-localized in intestines of NEC patients. In vitro, α7nAChR agonist PNU-282987 significantly reduced the increase of NLRP3, activated caspase-1, and IL-1β in macrophages. PNU-282987 also significantly reduced the increase of p-mTOR. The effect was blocked by AMPK inhibitor compound C. The expression of NLRP3, activated caspase-1, and IL-1β was inhibited after mTOR inhibitor rapamycin treatment. In NEC model mice, PNU-282987 reduced the expression of p-mTOR, NLRP3, activated caspase-1, and IL-1β in the intestine. Meanwhile, rapamycin significantly attenuated NLRP3 activation and the release of IL-1β. Moreover, the proportion of intestinal macrophages and intestinal injury decreased after PNU-282987 treatment., Conclusion: Macrophage α7nAChR activation mitigates NLRP3 inflammasome activation by modulating mTOR phosphorylation, and subsequently alleviates intestinal inflammation and injury in NEC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 ( 177 Lu-PSMA-617) prolongs radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) and taxane therapy. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with taxane-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer., Methods: In this phase 3, randomised, controlled trial conducted at 74 sites across Europe and North America, taxane-naive patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had progressed once on a previous ARPI were randomly allocated (1:1) to open-label, intravenous 177 Lu-PSMA-617 at a dosage of 7·4 GBq (200 mCi) ± 10% once every 6 weeks for six cycles, or a change of ARPI (to abiraterone or enzalutamide, administered orally on a continuous basis per product labelling). Crossover from ARPI change to 177 Lu-PSMA-617 was allowed after centrally confirmed radiographic progression. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomisation until radiographic progression or death, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was a secondary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04689828) and is ongoing. In this primary report of the study, we present primary (first data cutoff) and updated (third data cutoff) analyses of radiographic progression-free survival; all other data are based on the third data cutoff., Findings: Overall, of the 585 patients screened, 468 met all eligibility criteria and were randomly allocated between June 15, 2021 and Oct 7, 2022 to receive 177 Lu-PSMA-617 (234 [50%] patients) or ARPI change (234 [50%]). Baseline characteristics were mostly similar between groups; median number of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 cycles was 6·0 (IQR 4·0-6·0). Of patients assigned to ARPI change, 134 (57%) crossed over to receive 177 Lu-PSMA-617. In the primary analysis (median time from randomisation to first data cutoff 7·26 months [IQR 3·38-10·55]), the median radiographic progression-free survival was 9·30 months (95% CI 6·77-not estimable) in the 177 Lu-PSMA-617 group versus 5·55 months (4·04-5·95) in the ARPI change group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·41 [95% CI 0·29-0·56]; p<0·0001). In the updated analysis at time of the third data cutoff (median time from randomisation to third data cutoff 24·11 months [IQR 20·24-27·40]), median radiographic progression-free survival was 11·60 months (95% CI 9·30-14·19) in the 177 Lu-PSMA-617 group versus 5·59 months (4·21-5·95) in the ARPI change group (HR 0·49 [95% CI 0·39-0·61]). The incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events was lower in the 177 Lu-PSMA-617 group (at least one event in 81 [36%] of 227 patients; four [2%] grade 5 [none treatment related]) than the ARPI change group (112 [48%] of 232; five [2%] grade 5 [one treatment related])., Interpretation: 177 Lu-PSMA-617 prolonged radiographic progression-free survival relative to ARPI change, with a favourable safety profile. For patients with PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who are being considered for a change of ARPI after progression on a previous ARPI, 177 Lu-PSMA-617 may be an effective treatment alternative., Funding: Novartis., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MJM declares receiving consulting or advisory fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Clarity Pharmaceuticals, Convergent Therapeutics, Daiichi, ITM Isotope Technologies Munich, Lantheus Medical Imaging, Pfizer, POINT Biopharma, Progenics, Telix Pharmaceuticals, and Z-Alpha; stock and other ownership in Doximity; travel, accommodations, and expenses from APCCC, AstraZeneca, and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; institutional research funding from Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Celgene, Corcept Therapeutics, Janssen, Novartis, Progenics, and Roche/Genentech; patents pending with Novartis; and royalties from Telix. DC declares receiving payment or honorarium from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clovis, Eisai, Exelisis, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, QED Therapeutics, and Roche; travel or other expenses from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; and other financial or non-financial interests in Spanish Oncology Genito-Urinary Group Foundation and GUARD Consortium Spanish group. KH declares receiving grants or contracts from Boston Scientific, Janssen, and Novartis; consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bain Capital, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Convergent, Curium, Debiopharm, EcoR1, Fusion, GE Healthcare, Immedica, Isotopen Technologien München, Janssen, Merck, Molecular Partners, Novartis, NVision, POINT Biopharma, Pfizer, Radiopharm Theranostics, Rhine Pharma, Siemens Healthineers, Sofie Biosciences, Telix, Theragnostics, and Y-mAbs Therapeutics; and stock or other ownership in AdvanCell, Aktis Oncology, Convergent, NVision, Pharma 15, and Sofie Biosciences. JSdB declares receiving grants or contracts from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bioxcel Therapeutics, Crescendo, Daiichi-Sankyo, Endocyte, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, ImCheck Therapeutics, Janssen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi Aventis; consulting or advisory fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Orion, Pfizer, Sanofi Aventis, and Taiho; payment or honorarium from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cellcentric, Crecendo, Daiichi, Genentech, Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck Serono, Mycrix, MSD, Orion, Pfizer, Sanofi Aventis, and Taiho; being an inventor on patent 8822438 for a method for treating cancer; participating on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bioxcel Therapeutics, Crescendo, Daiichi-Sankyo, Endocyte, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, ImCheck Therapeutics, Janssen, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Oncternal, Pfizer, and Sanofi Aventis; and receiving institutional royalties or licences related to abiraterone, PARP inhibitor, and PI3K/AKT. NDS declares receiving support for the present manuscript from Novartis; consulting fees from AbbVie, Accord, Amgen, Antev, Arquer, Asieris, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Aura Biosciences, Bayer, Bioprotect, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clarity, Cold Genesys, Curium, Dendreon, Exact Imaging, Ferring, Fize Medical, Invitae, Janssen, Lantheus, Lilly, MDXHealth, Merck, Minomic, Myriad, Novartis, PlatformQ, Pfizer, POINT Biopharma, Preview, Promaxo, Propella, Protara, Sanofi Genzyme, Siemens, Speciality Networks, Sumitomo, Telix, Tolmar, and Urogen; having a leadership or fiduciary role for Photocure, and Alessa; and having stock or stock options with Photocure, and Alessa. KNC declares receiving grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, POINT Biopharma, and Roche; and consulting fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, POINT Biopharma, and Roche. MC declares receiving support for the present manuscript from Novartis; consulting fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Boston Scientific, Elekta, Johnson & Johnson, Lantheus, Macrogenics, Pfizer, Profound Medical, Sumitomo, Telix, Tolmar, and Tempus; payment or honorarium from Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Profound Medical, and Telix; participating on an advisory board for Telix; and having a leadership or fiduciary role for the Society of Nuclear Medical and Molecular Imaging, and the American Urological Association. JMP declares receiving grants or contracts from BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Immunocore, Mirati, MSD, and Pfizer; consulting fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clovis, Ideaya, Immunocore, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer; and travel expenses from AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Pfizer. AF declares receiving payment or honorarium from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer; and travel expenses from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, SD, Novartis, and Pfizer. XXW declares receiving institutional grants or contracts from Bristol Myers Squibb; consulting fees from Dendreon and Novartis; honorarium from Novartis; travel or other expenses from Novartis; and participating on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for Dendreon and Novartis. HM declares receiving payment or honorarium from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer; travel or other expenses from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche; and acting on a scientific steering committee for Curium. GR declares receiving grants or contracts from Bayer; and consulting fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer. HŠ declares receiving consulting fees from Astellas, Bayer, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer. JN declares receiving contracts or grants from ABX, and Novartis; consulting fees from Curium, and POINT Biopharma; and payment or honorarium from Bayer AG, and Pfizer. BM declares receiving grants or contracts from Astellas, Bayer, Janssen, Roche, and Sanofi; payment or honorarium from Astellas, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi; travel or other expenses from Ipsen, Janssen Pfizer, and Roche; and other financial or non-financial interests in Astellas, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. ÁM-P declares receiving personal fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer; and non-financial support from Bayer, Ipsen, Merck, and Pfizer. EK, SG, TNK, CW, and KL declare being employed by and receiving restricted stock options from Novartis. OS declares receiving support for the present manuscript from Novartis; institutional grants or contracts from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Endocyte, Invitae, Janssen, Lantheus, Merck, Novartis, Progenics, and Tenebio; consulting fees from ARTBIO, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Clarity Pharmaceuticals, Fusion, Isotopen Technologien Muenchen, Janssen, Merck, Myovant, Myriad, Noria Therapeutics, NorthStar, Novartis, Pfizer, POINT Biopharma, Sanofi, Telix, and Tenebio; travel and accommodation expenses from Lantheus, NorthStar, and Novartis; participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for AstraZeneca, Merck, and Pfizer; and stock or stock options in ARTBIO, Clarity Pharmaceuticals, Convergent, Fusion, Lilly, Pfizer, Ratio, and Telix. KF declares receiving institutional honorarium or payments to Gustave Roussy Institute from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, and Sanofi; institutional participation on data safety monitoring or advisory boards for Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; and personal participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for Arvinas, CureVac, Macrogenics, Orion., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: About one-quarter of patients with advanced prostate cancer have alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. In a global phase 3 study, talazoparib plus enzalutamide significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with HRR-deficient metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)., Objectives: This article reviews the role of oncology nurses and advanced practice providers (APPs) in administering talazoparib plus enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC., Methods: This review and hypothetical case study illustrate the role of oncology nurses and APPs in the administration of talazoparib plus enzalutamide and the management of adverse events to ensure safe and effective use in clinical practice., Findings: Oncology nurses and APPs play an important role in the dosing and administration of talazoparib plus enzalutamide and can recognize and manage adverse events in patients with HRR-deficient mCRPC.

Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed tumours among men. Second-generation androgen receptor axis-targeted (ARAT) agents, namely abiraterone acetate (AbA) and enzalutamide (ENZ), are currently used in the management of metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC). However, the treatment is challenging due to the lack of prognostic biomarkers. Meanwhile, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have emerged as potential prognostic indicators of mCRPC. Thus, this study evaluated the impact of relevant SNPs on the treatment outcomes of 123 mCRPC patients enrolled in a hospital-based cohort study. The CYP17A1 rs2486758 C allele was associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of developing castration resistance (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.55; p = 0.003). Among patients without metastasis at tumour diagnosis and under AbA, a marginal association between YBX1 rs10493112 and progression-free survival was detected (log-rank test, p = 0.056). In the same subgroup, significant associations of HSD3B1 rs1047303 (CC/CA vs. AA; HR = 3.41; p = 0.025), YBX1 rs12030724 (AT vs. AA; HR = 3.54; p = 0.039) and YBX1 rs10493112 (log-rank test, p = 0.041; CC vs. AA/AC; HR = 3.22; p = 0.053) with overall survival were also observed, which were confirmed by multivariate Cox analyses. Although validation with larger cohorts is required, these findings suggest that SNPs could enhance the prognosis assessment of mCRPC patients, leading to a more personalised treatment.

Advancements in human-engineered heart tissue have enhanced the understanding of cardiac cellular alteration. Nevertheless, a human model simulating pathological remodeling following myocardial infarction for therapeutic development remains essential. Here we develop an engineered model of myocardial repair that replicates the phased remodeling process, including hypoxic stress, fibrosis, and electrophysiological dysfunction. Transcriptomic analysis identifies nine critical signaling pathways related to cellular fate transitions, leading to the evaluation of seventeen modulators for their therapeutic potential in a mini-repair model. A scoring system quantitatively evaluates the restoration of abnormal electrophysiology, demonstrating that the phased combination of TGFβ inhibitor SB431542, Rho kinase inhibitor Y27632, and WNT activator CHIR99021 yields enhanced functional restoration compared to single factor treatments in both engineered and mouse myocardial infarction model. This engineered heart tissue repair model effectively captures the phased remodeling following myocardial infarction, providing a crucial platform for discovering therapeutic targets for ischemic heart disease., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: This phase 1b study evaluated safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and rituximab (AVR) in treatment-naive mantle cell lymphoma (TN MCL). Patients received acalabrutinib from cycle 1 until progressive disease (PD) or undue toxicity, rituximab for 6 cycles with maintenance every other cycle through cycle 24 or until PD, and venetoclax, beginning at cycle 2, for 24 cycles. Twenty-one patients were enrolled; 95.2% completed induction (6 AVR cycles) and 47.6% continued acalabrutinib maintenance. Thirteen (61.9%) patients had grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs), most commonly neutropenia (33.3%). Seven (33.3%) patients had COVID-19 infection (6 [28.6%] serious AEs and 5 [23.8%] deaths, all among unvaccinated patients). There was no grade ≥3 atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, major hemorrhages, or tumor lysis syndrome. Overall response rate (ORR) was 100% (95% CI, 83.9-100.0) with 71.4% complete response. With median follow-up of 27.8 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. PFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 90.5% (95% CI, 67.0-97.5) and 63.2% (95% CI, 34.7-82.0), respectively; both were 95% after censoring COVID-19 deaths. OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 95.2% (95% CI, 70.7-99.3) and 75.2% (95% CI, 50.3-88.9), respectively; both were 100% after censoring COVID-19 deaths. Overall, 87.5% of patients with available minimal residual disease (MRD) data achieved MRD negativity (10-6; next-generation sequencing) during treatment. AVR represents a chemotherapy-free regimen for TN MCL and resulted in high ORR and high rates of MRD negativity. The trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02717624., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

The combination of ASC22, an anti-PD-L1 antibody potentially enhancing HIV-specific immunity and chidamide, a HIV latency reversal agent, may serve as a strategy for antiretroviral therapy-free virological control for HIV. People living with HIV, having achieved virological suppression, were enrolled to receive ASC22 and chidamide treatment in addition to their antiretroviral therapy. Participants were monitored over 24 weeks to measure changes in viral dynamics and the function of HIV-specific CD8 + T cells (NCT05129189). 15 participants completed the study. At week 8, CA HIV RNA levels showed a significant increase from baseline, and the values returned to baseline after discontinuing ASC22 and chidamide. The total HIV DNA was only transiently increased at week 4 (P = 0.014). In contrast, integrated HIV DNA did not significantly differ from baseline. Increases in the proportions of effector memory CD4 + and CD8 + T cells (T EM ) were observed from baseline to week 24 (P = 0.034 and P = 0.002, respectively). The combination treatment did not succeed in enhancing the function of HIV Gag/Pol- specific CD8 + T cells. Nevertheless, at week 8, a negative correlation was identified between the proportions of HIV Gag-specific T EM cells and alterations in integrated DNA in the T cell function improved group (P = 0.042 and P = 0.034, respectively). Nine adverse events were solicited, all of which were graded 1 and resolved spontaneously. The combined treatment of ASC22 and chidamide was demonstrated to be well-tolerated and effective in activating latent HIV reservoirs. Further investigations are warranted in the context of analytic treatment interruption., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are rare neoplasms with an increasing annual incidence and prevalence. Many are metastatic at presentation or recur following surgical resection and require systemic therapy, for which somatostatin analogs such as octreotide or lanreotide comprise typical first-line therapies. Nonetheless, treatment options remain limited. Epigenetic processes such as histone modifications have been implicated in malignant transformation and progression. In this study, we evaluated the anti-proliferative effects of a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, entinostat, which was computationally predicted to show anti-cancer activity, as confirmed in in vitro and in vivo models of GEP-NETs., Methods: This was a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of entinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory abdominal NETs. The primary objective was to estimate the objective response rate to entinostat. Additionally, with each patient as his/her own control we estimated the rates of tumor growth prior to enrollment on study and while receiving entinostat. Patients received 5 mg entinostat weekly until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The dose could be changed to 10 mg biweekly for patients who did not experience grade ≥ 2 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in cycle 1, but was primarily administered at the starting 5 mg weekly dose., Results: The study enrolled only 5 patients due to early termination by the drug sponsor. The first patient that enrolled had advanced disease and died within days of enrollment before follow-up imaging due to a grade 5 AE unrelated to study treatment and was considered non-evaluable. Best RECIST response for the remaining 4 patients was stable disease (SD) with time on study of 154+, 243, 574, and 741 days. With each patient as his/her own control, rates of tumor growth on entinostat were markedly reduced with rates 17%, 20%, 33%, and 68% of the rates prior to enrollment on study. Toxicities possibly or definitely related to entinostat included grade 2/3 neutrophil count decrease [2/4 (50%)/ 2/4 (50%)], grade 3 hypophosphatemia [1/4, (25%)], grade 1/2 fatigue [1/4 (25%)/ 2/4 (50%)], and other self-limiting grade 1/2 AEs., Conclusion: In the treatment of relapsed or refractory abdominal NETs, entinostat 5 mg weekly led to prolonged SD and reduced the rate of tumor growth by 32% to 83% with an acceptable safety profile (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03211988)., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Comprehensive genomic profiling is highly recommended for treatment decision in nonsquamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, rare genomic alterations are still being unveiled, with scarce data to guide therapy. Herein, we describe the treatment journey of a 56-year-old, never-smoker Caucasian woman with a metastatic NSCLC harboring a CD47-MET fusion, initially classified as a variant of unknown significance. She had undergone 3 lines of therapy over the course of 3 years, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and anti-angiogenic therapy. After reanalysis of her next-generation sequencing data in our service, the fusion was reclassified as likely oncogenic. The patient was started with fourth-line capmatinib, with a good tolerance so far and a complete metabolic response in the active sites of disease, currently ongoing for 18 months. In conclusion, we highlight the sensitivity of a novel MET fusion to capmatinib and emphasize the need for comprehensive panels in NSCLC and molecular tumor board discussions with specialized centers when rare findings arise., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Abstract: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) progression during Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor treatment is typically characterized by emergent B-cell receptor pathway mutations. Using peripheral blood samples from patients with relapsed/refractory CLL in ELEVATE-RR (NCT02477696; median 2 prior therapies), we report clonal evolution data for patients progressing on acalabrutinib or ibrutinib (median follow-up, 41 months). Paired (baseline and progression) samples were available for 47 (excluding 1 Richter) acalabrutinib-treated and 30 (excluding 6 Richter) ibrutinib-treated patients. At progression, emergent BTK mutations were observed in 31 acalabrutinib-treated (66%) and 11 ibrutinib-treated patients (37%; median variant allele fraction [VAF], 16.1% vs 15.6%, respectively). BTK C481S mutations were most common in both groups; T474I (n = 9; 8 co-occurring with C481) and the novel E41V mutation within the pleckstrin homology domain of BTK (n = 1) occurred with acalabrutinib, whereas neither mutation occurred with ibrutinib. L528W and A428D comutations presented in 1 ibrutinib-treated patient. Preexisting TP53 mutations were present in 25 acalabrutinib-treated (53.2%) and 16 ibrutinib-treated patients (53.3%) at screening. Emergent TP53 mutations occurred with acalabrutinib and ibrutinib (13% vs 7%; median VAF, 6.0% vs 37.3%, respectively). Six acalabrutinib-treated patients and 1 ibrutinib-treated patient had emergent TP53/BTK comutations. Emergent PLCG2 mutations occurred in 3 acalabrutinib-treated (6%) and 6 ibrutinib-treated patients (20%). One acalabrutinib-treated patient and 4 ibrutinib-treated patients had emergent BTK/PLCG2 comutations. Although common BTK C481 mutations were observed with both treatments, patterns of mutation and comutation frequency, mutation VAF, and uncommon BTK variants varied with acalabrutinib (T474I and E41V) and ibrutinib (L528W and A428D) in this patient population. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02477696., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1, an autosomal dominant neurogenetic and tumor predisposition syndrome, are susceptible to developing low-grade glioma and less commonly high-grade glioma. These gliomas exhibit loss of the neurofibromin gene [neurofibromin type 1 (NF1)], and 10% to 15% of sporadic high-grade gliomas have somatic NF1 alterations. Loss of NF1 leads to hyperactive RAS signaling, creating opportunity given the established efficacy of MEK inhibitors in plexiform neurofibromas and some individuals with low-grade glioma. We observed that NF1-deficient glioblastoma neurospheres were sensitive to the combination of an MEK inhibitor (mirdametinib) with irradiation, as evidenced by synergistic inhibition of cell growth, colony formation, and increased cell death. In contrast, NF1-intact neurospheres were not sensitive to the combination, despite complete ERK pathway inhibition. No neurosphere lines exhibited enhanced sensitivity to temozolomide combined with mirdametinib. Mirdametinib decreased transcription of homologous recombination genes and RAD51 foci, associated with DNA damage repair, in sensitive models. Heterotopic xenograft models displayed synergistic growth inhibition to mirdametinib combined with irradiation in NF1-deficient glioma xenografts but not in those with intact NF1. In sensitive models, benefits were observed at least 3 weeks beyond the completion of treatment, including sustained phosphor-ERK inhibition on immunoblot and decreased Ki-67 expression. These observations demonstrate synergistic activity between mirdametinib and irradiation in NF1-deficient glioma models and may have clinical implications for patients with gliomas that harbor germline or somatic NF1 alterations., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutation is a rare alteration in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), occurring in about 3%-4% of cases. Here we report disease and patient characteristics, and efficacy and tolerability of MET inhibitors among advanced METex14 NSCLC patients from the Italian real-world registry ATLAS., Materials and Methods: Clinical-pathological and molecular data, and treatment efficacy/tolerability outcomes were retrospectively collected from the ATLAS registry., Results: From July 2020 to July 2023 a total of 146 METex14 advanced NSCLC patients were included across 27 Italian centers. Median age was 74 years, and most patients were male (52%), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < 2 (72%) and adenocarcinoma subtype (83%). One hundred and twenty-five out of 146 (86%) patients received at least one line of systemic anticancer therapy. Fifty-six (38%) were treated with capmatinib and 34 (23%) with tepotinib. 29% and 52% of them received targeted treatment in the first and second line, respectively. In the cohort of patients treated with MET inhibitors, the response rate (RR) was 37% (33% in previously treated patients and 46% in treatment-naïve) with a disease control rate of 62%. With a median follow-up of 10.8 months, progression-free survival was 6.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-8.3 months] and overall survival was 10.7 months (95% CI 7.2-19.3 months). In patients with measurable brain metastases (17 cases), the intracranial RR was 41%. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 12% of patients with grade 3 peripheral edema in 7% of cases. A fatal adverse reaction occurred in one patient due to pneumonitis. TRAEs-related dose reduction and discontinuation were reported in 6% and 8% of cases, respectively., Conclusion: Capmatinib and tepotinib represent an effective treatment option in NSCLC patients with METex14. Real-world efficacy outcomes are worse than those reported in prospective clinical trials. Their activity is more pronounced in the treatment-naïve population, suggesting that this is the right setting in the management of patients with METex14., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Psoriasis is an immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease. First-line topical treatments include steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, vitamin D analogs, and anthralin. Recently, novel topical therapeutics like tapinarof and roflumilast have emerged with unique anti-inflammatory mechanisms and promising efficacy profiles., Materials and Methods: This review utilized PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases to identify recent studies on tapinarof and roflumilast. Criteria focused on efficacy, safety profiles, and therapeutic roles in psoriasis treatment., Results: Four primary literature articles were identified for tapinarof and five for roflumilast. Both drugs demonstrated strong efficacy with minimal adverse events in treating mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis. Tapinarof showed more frequent but mild adverse effects, while roflumilast had less frequent but more severe side effects., Discussion: Tapinarof and roflumilast offer once-daily dosing and successful treatment in restricted areas, potentially enhancing patient adherence. Cost remains a limiting factor, necessitating future comparative studies to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness between the two drugs., Conclusion: Tapinarof and roflumilast present promising topical treatments for psoriasis, showing efficacy and manageable safety profiles. Further research is crucial to fully elucidate their comparative benefits and drawbacks in clinical practice., (© 2024 The Author(s). Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Oncogenic signaling through the MAPK/ERK pathway drives tumor progression in many cancers. Although targeted MAPK/ERK pathway inhibitors improve survival in selected patients, most tumors are resistant. New drugs could be identified in small-animal models that, unlike in vitro models, can address oral uptake, compound bioavailability, and toxicity. This requires pharmacologic conformity between human and model MAPK/ERK pathways and available phenotypic assays. In this study, we test if the conserved MAPK/ERK pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans could serve as a model for pharmacological inhibition and develop in vivo pipelines for high-throughput compound screens. Using fluorescence-based image analysis of vulva development as a readout for MAPK/ERK activity, we obtained excellent assay Z-scores for the MEK inhibitors trametinib (Z = 0.95), mirdametinib (Z = 0.93), and AZD8330 (Z = 0.87), as well as the ERK inhibitor temuterkib (Z = 0.86). The throughput was 800 wells per hour, with an average seed density of 25.5 animals per well. Readouts included drug efficacy, toxicity, and pathway specificity, which was tested against pathway activating upstream (lin-15)- and downstream (lin-1) mutants. To validate the model in a high-throughput setting, we screened a blinded library of 433 anticancer compounds and identified four MEK inhibitors among seven positive hits. Our results highlight a high degree of pharmacological conformity between C. elegans and human MAPK/ERK pathways, and the presented high-throughput pipeline may discover and characterize novel inhibitors in vivo., Significance: Many tumors depend on MAPK/ERK signaling to sustain growth, avoid cell death, and metastasize. We show that specific and clinically relevant MAPK/ERK signaling inhibitors can be discovered in vivo with a high-throughput screening pipeline in small animals., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the prognostic outcomes between metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients receiving conventional androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and those receiving ADT plus a novel androgen-receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) in routine clinical practice in Japan., Methods: This was conducted as a retrospective multicenter study including 581 mCSPC patients, consisting of 305 receiving ADT alone or in combination with bicalutamide (group 1) and 276 receiving ADT plus one of the following ARSIs: abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, or enzalutamide (group 2). Prognostic outcomes between these 2 groups were comprehensively compared., Results: In the entire cohort, prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) in group 2 was significantly longer than that in group 1, while no significant difference was noted in overall survival (OS) between the two groups. In patients corresponding to the LATITUDE high-risk group, however, both PSA-PFS and OS in group 2 were significantly longer than those in group 1. Of several factors examined, the following were identified as independent predictors of poor PSA-PFS in the entire cohort as well as the LATITUDE high-risk group: high C-reactive protein, high lactate dehydrogenase, high alkaline phosphatase, high Gleason score, and group 1. Furthermore, it was possible to precisely classify both the entire cohort and LATITUDE high-risk group into 3 risk groups regarding PSA-PFS according to the positive numbers of independent factors: positive for ≤1 factor, favorable; 2 factors, intermediate; and ≥3 factors, poor., Conclusion: Combined use of ARSIs with ADT could improve the prognostic outcomes of mCSPC patients, particularly those in the LATITUDE high-risk group, in real-world clinical practice in Japan., (© 2024 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Aims: To assess toxicity and patient quality of life after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to oligoprogressive disease (OPD) in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) on androgen receptor targeted agents (ARTA)., Material and Methods: This phase II trial enrolled patients with metastatic CRPC with ≤ 2 oligoprogressive lesions in bone, lymph node, lung, or prostate. All patients were receiving systemic treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide at the time of oligoprogression. All patients received SBRT to the OPD site(s) and continued the current ARTA. Patients received 30 Gy in 5 fractions (alternate days) to the OPD site. The primary endpoint of the trial is to assess if SBRT to OPD sites results in progression free survival of >6 months. The primary endpoint for this toxicity analysis is the rate of grade 3 or higher adverse events at any timepoint up to 6 months after SBRT. Secondary endpoints included comparing pre- and post-SBRT patient-related outcomes reported using visual analogue scale scores and EQ-5D health questionnaire., Results: Forty enrolled patients had at least 6 months of follow-up at the time of analysis. Grade 3 or higher toxicity from any cause recorded using common terminology criteria for adverse events and radiation therapy oncology group was found in 8/40 (20%) of patients, but only 1/40 (2.5%) was deemed possibly related to SBRT. There was no significant difference in mean EQ5D visual analogue scale score from baseline to each timepoint after SBRT (p = 0.449)., Conclusion: In this prospective phase II clinical trial for OPD whilst on ARTA in the CRPC setting, we report low grade ≥ 3 toxicity after SBRT. There is no discernible change in patient-reported quality of life due to SBRT treatment. The final results of progression-free survival and toxicity of SBRT treatment will be reported once further follow-up is complete., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Thumbtack Needling (TN) has been employed in the treatment of functional constipation (FC), although the existing evidence supporting its effectiveness is limited. This study is to evaluate the efficacy of TN in ameliorating FC., Method: A total of 482 eligible patients were recruited and randomly assigned to the TN group or the Mosapride Citrate (MC) group. The TN was buried once for three days, rest for one day after two consecutive burials, followed by a 4-week follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the score for Complete and spontaneous bowel movement score (CSBMs). Secondary outcome measures included the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), Cleveland Clinic Score (CCS), and the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAC-QOL)., Results: Out of the 482 patients randomized, 241 were allocated to each group. Of these, 216 patients (89.6 %) in both groups completed the intervention and follow-up. Compared with the baseline, the differences of CSBMs in TN group [1.76(95 % CI, 1.61 to 1.91)] and MC group [1.35(95 % CI, 1.20 to 1.50)] at week 4 meet the threshold for minimal clinically important difference (MCID). However, there were no clinical difference from baseline at week 2 and week 8 in both groups. Mean CSBMs at week 4 was 3.35 ± 0.99 in the TN group and 3 ± 1.03 in the MC group (adjusted difference between groups, 0.37 points [95 % CI, 0.18 to 0.55]; P < 0.001), although differences between the two groups did not meet the MCID threshold., Conclusion: Compared with mosapride citrate, thumbtack needling produced a greater improvement in CSBMs, although the difference from control was not clinically significant., Gov Identifier: ChiCTR2100043684., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)