Search

An increasing number of studies have provided strong evidence that gut microbiota interact with the immune system and stimulate various mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of auto-immune diseases such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Indeed, gut microbiota could be a source of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers but also hold the promise to discover novel therapeutic strategies. Thus far, specific SLE microbial signatures have not yet been clearly identified with alteration patterns that may vary between human and animal studies. In this study, a comparative analysis of a clinically well-characterized cohort of adult patients with SLE showed reduced biodiversity, a lower Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio, and six differentially abundant taxa compared with healthy controls. An unsupervised clustering of patients with SLE patients identified a subgroup of patients with a stronger alteration of their gut microbiota. Interestingly, this clustering was strongly correlated with the disease activity assessed with the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score (p = 0.03, odd ratio = 15) and the identification of specific alterations involving the F/B ratio and some different taxa. Then, the gut microbiota of pristane-induced lupus and control mice were analyzed for comparison with our human data. Among the six differentially abundant taxa of the human disease signature, five were common with our murine model. Finally, an exhaustive cross-species comparison between our data and previous human and murine SLE studies revealed a core-set of gut microbiome species that might constitute biomarker panels relevant for future validation studies.

Microbiotas play critical roles in human health, yet in most cases scientists lack standardized and reproducible methods from collection and preservation of samples, as well as the choice of omic analysis, up to the data processing. To date, stool sample preservation remains a source of technological bias in metagenomic sequencing, despite newly developed storage solutions. Here, we conducted a comparative study of 10 storage methods for human stool over a 14-day period of storage at fluctuating temperatures. We first compared the performance of each stabilizer with observed bacterial composition variation within the same specimen. Then, we identified the nature of the observed variations to determine which bacterial populations were more impacted by the stabilizer. We found that DNA stabilizers display various stabilizing efficacies and affect the recovered bacterial profiles thus highlighting that some solutions are more performant in preserving the true gut microbial community. Furthermore, our results showed that the bias associated with the stabilizers can be linked to the phenotypical traits of the bacterial populations present in the studied samples. Although newly developed storage solutions have improved our capacity to stabilize stool microbial content over time, they are nevertheless not devoid of biases hence requiring the implantation of standard operating procedures. Acknowledging the biases and limitations of the implemented method is key to better interpret and support true associated microbiome patterns that will then lead us towards personalized medicine, in which the microbiota profile could constitute a reliable tool for clinical practice.