Search

Background and Aims Integrated IBD care is effective but not routinely implemented. Validated methods that simultaneously address mind and body targets such as resilience may improve access and outcomes. We describe the development and implementation of the GRITTTM Method and its impact on resilience, health care resource utilization (HCRU) and opioid use in IBD. Methods Consecutive patients from an academic IBD center were evaluated for low resilience based on provider referral. Low resilience patients were invited to participate in the GRITTTM program. Primary outcome was % reduction in HCU. Secondary outcomes were change in resilience, corticosteroid and opioid use. Patients were allocated into 2 groups for analysis: GRITT Participants (GP) and Non-Participants (NP). Clinical data and HCU in the year prior to enrollment were collected at baseline and 12 months. One-way repeated measures MANCOVA evaluated group X time interactions for the primary outcome. Effect size was calculated for changes in resilience over time. Results Of 456 screened IBD patients 394 were eligible; 184 GP and 210 NP. GP had greater reduction in HCU than NP: 71% reduction in ED visits; 94% reduction in unplanned hospitalizations. There was a 49% reduction in opioid use and 73% reduction in corticosteroid use in GP. Resilience increased by 27.3 points (59%), yielding a large effect size (d=2.4). Conclusion Mind-body care that focuses on building resilience in the context of IBD care may be a novel approach to reduce unplanned health care utilization and opioid use but large, multi-center, randomized, controlled trials are needed.

Whether preoperative treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) increases the risk of postoperative infectious complications remains controversial. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether preoperative exposure to TNFis is an independent risk factor for postoperative infectious complications within 30 days of surgery.We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study of patients with IBD undergoing intra-abdominal surgery across 17 sites from the Crohn'sColitis Foundation Clinical Research Alliance. Infectious complications were categorized as surgical site infections (SSIs) or non-SSIs. Current TNFi exposure was defined as use within 12 weeks of surgery, and serum was collected for drug-level analyses. Multivariable models for occurrence of the primary outcome, any infection, or SSI were adjusted by predefined covariates (age, sex, preoperative steroid use, and disease type), baseline variables significantly associated (P.05) with any infection or SSI separately, and TNFi exposure status. Exploratory models used TNFi exposure based on serum drug concentration.A total of 947 patients were enrolled from September 2014 through June 2017. Current TNFi exposure was reported by 382 patients. Any infection (18.1% vs 20.2%, P = .469) and SSI (12.0% vs 12.6%, P = .889) rates were similar in patients currently exposed to TNFis and those unexposed. In multivariable analysis, current TNFi exposure was not associated with any infection (odds ratio, 1.050; 95% confidence interval, 0.716-1.535) or SSI (odds ratio, 1.249; 95% confidence interval, 0.793-1.960). Detectable TNFi drug concentration was not associated with any infection or SSI.Preoperative TNFi exposure was not associated with postoperative infectious complications in a large prospective multicenter cohort.

Background Patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) can experience pouch inflammation postoperatively. The use of antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologics may be associated with pouch inflammation, but limited data exist on the impact of multiple advanced therapies on development of subsequent pouch inflammation. The aim of this study was to assess for an association between preoperative use of multiple advanced therapies and risk of endoscopically detected inflammatory pouch diseases (EIPDs). Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of ulcerative colitis (UC) and indeterminate colitis (IBDU) patients who underwent an IPAA at a quaternary care center from January 2015 to December 2019. Patients were grouped based on number and type of preoperative drug exposures. The primary outcome was EIPD within 5 years of IPAA. Results Two hundred ninety-eight patients were included in this analysis. Most of these patients had UC (95.0%) and demonstrated pancolonic disease distribution (86.1%). The majority of patients were male (57.4%) and underwent surgery for medically refractory disease (79.2%). The overall median age at surgery was 38.6 years. Preoperatively, 68 patients were biologic/small molecule-naïve, 125 received anti-TNF agents only, and 105 received non-anti-TNF agents only or multiple classes. Ninety-one patients developed EIPD. There was no significant association between type (P = .38) or number (P = .58) of exposures and EIPD, but older individuals had a lower risk of EIPD (P = .001; hazard ratio, 0.972; 95% confidence interval, 0.956-0.989). Conclusion Development of EIPD was not associated with number or type of preoperative advanced therapies.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammation in IBD is postulated to drive NAFLD progression from steatosis to fibrosis. AIMS: To study the histopathological spectrum of NAFLD in Crohn disease (CD) and Ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Patients with biopsy proven NAFLD at a quaternary center from 2008 to 2018 were included in this retrospective analysis. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) diagnosed either clinically and/or endoscopically at the time of liver biopsy. Multivariable regression and propensity score (PS) weighted analysis were conducted. Statistical analysis were performed using SAS statistical software. RESULTS: Among 1009 patients with NAFLD a diagnosis of IBD was identified in 50 cases (34 CD and 16 UC). On multivariable analysis; CD was independently associated with significantly higher odds of advanced fibrosis (AF) on liver biopsy (adjusted OR = 4.09, 95% CI = 1.40–11.94) compared to NAFLD patients without IBD. Similar results were obtained with both the overlap PS weighted model (OR = 3.17, 95% CI = 1.55–6.49) and the PS matched model (OR = 3.49, 95% CI = 1.50–8.13). CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of patients with histologically well characterized NAFLD, AF was more common in CD patients than NAFLD patients without IBD. These findings must be confirmed in a larger cohort, but suggest CD patients with NAFLD could be at greater risk for liver fibrosis.

Background Postoperative recurrence [POR] of Crohn’s disease following ileocolonic resection is common. The impact of immediate postoperative intra-abdominal septic complications [IASC] on endoscopic and surgical recurrence has not been elucidated. Aims To evaluate if IASC is associated with an increased risk for endoscopic and surgical POR. Methods This was a retrospective study of adult Crohn’s disease patients undergoing ileocolonic resection with primary anastomosis between 2009 and 2020. IASC was defined as anastomotic leak or intra-abdominal abscess within 90 days of the date of surgery. Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazard modelling were performed to assess the impact of IASC on endoscopic POR [modified Rutgeerts’ score ≥ i2b] at index postoperative ileocolonoscopy and long-term surgical recurrence. Results In 535 Crohn’s disease patients [median age 35 years, 22.1% active smokers, 35.7% one or more prior resection] had an ileocolonic resection with primary anastomosis. A minority of patients [N = 47; 8.8%] developed postoperative IASC. In total, 422 [78.9%] patients had one or more postoperative ileocolonoscopies, of whom 163 [38.6%] developed endoscopic POR. After adjusting for other risk factors for postoperative recurrence, postoperative IASC was associated with significantly greater odds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.45 [1.23–4.97]; p = 0.01) and decreased time (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR]: 1.60 [1.04–2.45]; p = 0.03] to endoscopic POR. Furthermore, IASC was associated with increased risk (aOR: 2.3 [1.04–4.87] p = 0.03) and decreased survival-free time [aHR: 2.53 [1.31–4.87]; p = 0.006] for surgical recurrence. Conclusion IASC is associated with an increased risk for endoscopic and surgical POR of Crohn’s disease. Preoperative optimization to prevent IASC, in addition to postoperative biological prophylaxis, may help reduce the risk for endoscopic and surgical POR.

Background Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Using a novel electronic reporting tool, we aimed to prospectively describe the onset of tofacitinib efficacy during induction therapy in a real-world study. Methods Patient-reported outcome data (PROs) including the simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI), PRO Measurement Identification Systems (PROMIS) measures, and adverse events were collected daily for the first 14 days and at day 28 and 56. Paired t tests and P for trend were utilized to compare changes in SCCAI over time. Bivariate analyses and logistic regression models were performed to describe response (SCCAI Results Of all included patients (n = 96), 67% had failed ≥2 biologics, and 61.5% were on concomitant steroids. Starting at day 3, PROs showed significant and persistent decline of the mean SCCAI (−1.1, P < 000.1) including significantly lower SCCAI subscores for stool frequency (−0.3; P < .003), bleeding (−0.3; P < .0002) and urgency (−0.2; P < .001). Steroid-free remission at day 14, 28, and 56 was achieved in 25%, 30.2%, and 29.2% of patients, respectively. Neither prior biologics nor endoscopic severity were independently predictive of response or remission in multivariate models. Numeric improvements in all PROMIS measures (anxiety, depression, social satisfaction) were seen through day 56. Rates of discontinuation due to adverse events were low. Conclusions In this prospective real-world study, tofacitinib resulted in a rapid and persistent improvement in UC disease activity PROs. The safety findings were consistent with the established safety profile of tofacitinib.

Alzheimer disease (AD) affects 5 million Americans and early recognition improves cognitive function. Chronic inflammation and gut microbiome alteration are linked to cognitive decline which are common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We investigated the association of IBD with development of AD. A commercial database (Explorys Inc., Cleveland, OH), an aggregate of electronic health records from 26 major US health care systems, was surveyed. Cohorts of patients with Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) diagnoses of Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and AD were identified. IBD patients with new diagnosis of AD were characterized based on demographic and traditional AD risk factors and IBD-related features. Among 342,740 IBD patients in the database, AD developed in 5750 IBD patients (1.55%). After adjusting for traditional AD risk factors, IBD was identified as an independent risk factor for development of AD [odds ratio (OR)=2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.10-2.51]. IBD patients with AD were younger in comparison to AD patients without IBD. On sub-group analysis, patients with CD had higher odds of developing AD (adjusted OR=3.34, 95% CI=3.25-3.42) than UC (adjusted OR=1.09, 95% CI=1.06-1.14). Use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) inhibitors in IBD was associated with significantly lower odds of developing AD in both CD and UC. In this population based study, IBD was independently associated with development of AD. Among IBD; the association was stronger in patients with CD in comparison with UC. Use of TNF-α inhibitors was associated with lower odds of developing AD.

There are conflicting data assessing the impact of isolated post-operative anastomotic inflammation on future disease progression. The aim of this study was to determine the relative risk of severe disease progression in post-operative Crohn's disease (CD) patients with isolated anastomotic disease.Retrospective cohort study of adult CD patients undergoing ileocolonic resection between 2009 and 2020. Patients with a post-operative ileocolonoscopy ≤18 months from surgery and ≥1 subsequent ileocolonoscopy were included. Disease activity was assessed using the modified Rutgeerts' score (RS). Primary outcome was severe endoscopic progression, defined as i3 or i4 disease, on immediate subsequent ileocolonoscopy and during entire post-operative follow-up. Secondary outcome was surgical recurrence.One hundred and ninety-nine CD patients had an ileocolonoscopy ≤18 months from surgery, index RS of i0-i2b and ≥1 subsequent ileocolonoscopy. At index ileocolonoscopy, 34.7% had i0 disease, 16.1% i1, 24.6% i2a and 24.6% i2b. On multivariable logistic regression, i2b disease was associated with severe endoscopic progression compared to i0 or i1 (aOR 5.53; P 0.001) and i2a disease patients (aOR 2.63; P = 0.03). However, i2a disease did not confer increased risk compared to i0 or i1 disease (P = 0.09). Furthermore, i2b patients experienced severe endoscopic progression significantly earlier than i0 or i1 disease (aHR 4.68; P 0.001), whereas i2a disease did not differ from i0 or i1 disease (P = 0.25). Surgical recurrence was not associated with index RS i0-i2b (P = 0.86).Post-operative ileal disease recurrence, not isolated anastomotic inflammation, confers increased risk for severe endoscopic disease progression. Location of CD recurrence may impact optimal management strategies.

B cells, which are critical for intestinal homeostasis, remain understudied in ulcerative colitis (UC). In this study, we recruited three cohorts of patients with UC (primary cohort, n = 145; validation cohort 1, n = 664; and validation cohort 2, n = 143) to comprehensively define the landscape of B cells during UC-associated intestinal inflammation. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, single-cell IgH gene sequencing and protein-level validation, we mapped the compositional, transcriptional and clonotypic landscape of mucosal and circulating B cells. We found major perturbations within the mucosal B cell compartment, including an expansion of naive B cells and IgG(+) plasma cells with curtailed diversity and maturation. Furthermore, we isolated an auto-reactive plasma cell clone targeting integrin αvβ6 from inflamed UC intestines. We also identified a subset of intestinal CXCL13-expressing TFH-like T peripheral helper cells that were associated with the pathogenic B cell response. Finally, across all three cohorts, we confirmed that changes in intestinal humoral immunity are reflected in circulation by the expansion of gut-homing plasmablasts that correlates with disease activity and predicts disease complications. Our data demonstrate a highly dysregulated B cell response in UC and highlight a potential role of B cells in disease pathogenesis.

Background The World Trade Center (WTC) general responder cohort (GRC) was exposed to environmental toxins possibly associated with increased risk of developing autoimmune conditions. Objectives Two study designs were used to assess incidence and risks of autoimmune conditions in the GRC. Methods Three clinically trained professionals established the status of possible GRC cases of autoimmune disorders adhering to diagnostic criteria, supplemented, as needed, by specialists' review of consenting responders' medical records. Nested case-control analyses using conditional logistic regression estimated the risk associated with high WTC exposure (being in the 9/11/2001 dust cloud or ≥median days' response worked) compared with low WTC exposure (all other GRC members'). Four controls were matched to each case on age at case diagnosis (±2 years), sex, race/ethnicity, and year of program enrollment. Sex-specific and sensitivity analyses were performed. GRC age- and sex-adjusted standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were compared with the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP). Complete REP inpatient and outpatient medical records were reviewed by specialists. Conditions meeting standardized criteria on ≥2 visits were classified as REP confirmed cases. Results Six hundred and twenty-eight responders were diagnosed with autoimmune conditions between 2002 and 2017. In the nested case-control analyses, high WTC exposure was not associated with autoimmune domains and conditions (rheumatologic domain odds ratio [OR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77, 1.37; rheumatoid arthritis OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.70, 1.77). GRC members had lower SIR than REP. Women's risks were generally greater than men's. Conclusions The study found no statistically significant increased risk of autoimmune conditions with WTC exposures.

Background Ileal pouch inflammation is a common problem following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Despite its prevalence, diagnosis remains multimodal and requires endoscopy. The use of biomarkers in the prediction of and/or association with pouchitis has not been well characterized. We performed a systematic review to summarize the available evidence. Method A search of Ovid, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science was conducted. Inclusion criteria included studies evaluating biomarkers for the evaluation and prediction of inflammation in patients with IPAA utilizing pouchoscopy as the gold standard. Exclusion criteria included studies on the role of the microbiome or genetic markers. Results A total of 28 studies, 5 case-control studies, and 23 observational cohort studies were identified. Fecal biomarkers were assessed in 23 studies, of which fecal calprotectin was the most commonly studied with sensitivities ranging from 57% to 92% and specificities from 19% to 92%. Six studies examined serum biomarkers. None of the serum biomarkers demonstrated a high sensitivity or specificity in association with pouch inflammation. Six studies described the longitudinal assessment of biomarkers. Of these studies, only three reported a predictive role of biomarkers in diagnosing endoscopic inflammation. Conclusions Biomarkers have emerged as a potential option to improve the management of pouchitis given the relative ease of sampling compared to pouchoscopy. Unfortunately, the evaluated biomarkers have not consistently demonstrated accuracy in predicting inflammation. Moreover, these biomarkers have not been reliably shown to be sensitive or specific in association with endoscopic pouch inflammation to merit their widespread use in clinical practice.

Artificial intelligence [AI] techniques are quickly spreading across medicine as an analytical method to tackle challenging clinical questions. What were previously thought of as highly complex data sources, such as images or free text, are now becoming manageable. Novel analytical methods merge the latest developments in information technology infrastructure with advances in computer science. Once primarily associated with Silicon Valley, AI techniques are now making their way into medicine, including in the field of inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD]. Understanding potential applications and limitations of these techniques can be difficult, in particular for busy clinicians. In this article, we explain the basic terminologies and provide a particular focus on the foundations behind state-of-the-art AI methodologies in both imaging and text. We explore the growing applications of AI in medicine, with a specific focus on IBD to inform the practising gastroenterologist and IBD specialist. Finally, we outline possible future uses of these technologies in daily clinical practice.

Risk factors for intervention in terminal ileal (TI) stricturing Crohn's disease (CD) are poorly defined. Novel and rigorous definitions for TI strictures recently became available.We aimed to describe the rates of symptoms or need for endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) or surgery as well as risk factors of progression in a well-defined stricturing CD cohort.Consecutive adult patients with non-penetrating stricturing TI CD, as defined by centrally-read magnetic resonance enterography CONSTRICT criteria, were separated into a derivation and validation cohort. Clinical and imaging characteristics were collected following prespecified scoring conventions. Primary outcome was a composite endpoint of EBD or surgery ("intervention"). Multivariable analysis was performed.Eighty-six patients (48.8% female, median age 36 years) met selection criteria, 17.4% had prior EBD, 59.3% previously received biologics and 58.1% of strictures were anastomotic. Median follow-up was 63.4 [95% CI: 57, 68.9] months. In the derivation cohort, at 12 and 48 months, 26% and 45% of patients had intervention, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed obstructive symptoms (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.444; 95% CI 1.126-1.852), stricture duration (HR 0.974; 95% CI, 0.954-0.995) and length (HR 1.039; 95% CI, 1.011-1.069) predicted intervention. The concordance index for split-sample validation was 0.74 and 0.67, respectively. Biologics were not associated with intervention. An online risk calculator was constructed.In patients with TI stricturing CD, 26% and 45% required intervention at 1 and 4 years. Obstructive symptoms, stricture duration and length were independent and validated predictors of the need for intervention. These findings are important for clinical practice and aid in the design of future trials for CD strictures.

Background Postoperative recurrence (POR) of Crohn’s disease (CD) is common after surgical resection. We aimed to compare biologic type and timing for preventing POR in adult CD patients after ileocecal resection (ICR). Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of CD patients who underwent an ICR at 2 medical centers. Recurrence was defined by endoscopy (≥ i2b Rutgeerts score) or radiography (active inflammation in neoterminal ileum) and stratified by type and timing of postoperative prophylactic biologic within 12 weeks following an ICR (none, tumor necrosis factor antagonists [anti-TNF], vedolizumab, and ustekinumab). Results We identified 1037 patients with CD who underwent an ICR. Of 278 (26%) who received postoperative prophylaxis, 80% were placed on an anti-TNF agent (n = 223) followed by ustekinumab (n = 28, 10%) and vedolizumab (n = 27, 10%). Prophylaxis was initiated in 35% within 4 weeks following an ICR and in 65% within 4 to 12 weeks. After adjusting for factors associated with POR, compared with no biologic prophylaxis, the initiation of an anti-TNF agent within 4 weeks following an ICR was associated with a reduction in POR (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.93). Prophylaxis after 4 weeks following an ICR or with vedolizumab or ustekinumab was not associated with a reduction in POR compared with those who did not receive prophylaxis. Conclusion Early initiation of an anti-TNF agent within 4 weeks following an ICR was associated with a reduction in POR. Vedolizumab or ustekinumab, at any time following surgery, was not associated with a reduction in POR, although sample size was limited.

Background The level of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) training in general gastroenterology fellowship is often insufficient to prepare trainees to deliver advanced IBD care in practice. Advanced IBD fellowships have been developed to fill this training gap, but there is no established curriculum, and significant variability exists across programs. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are practical and realistic objectives that define essential tasks of a specialty that physicians should master to be competent during independent practice. The American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) and Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation (Foundation) established a task force to develop and appraise EPAs for advanced IBD fellowship. Methods Entrustable professional activities were developed using a multistep approach in a similar manner to other specialties. Initial EPAs identified via focus groups were evaluated, critiqued, and changed using an iterative model of feedback. The final EPAs were selected after the task force conducted a 3-phase modified Delphi method consisting of 2 sequential rounds of web-based voting and an in-person consensus meeting. Results Ten EPAs for advanced IBD fellowship were established including detailed descriptions with the associated knowledge, skills, and attitudes for each that can serve as curricular milestones. Conclusion Ten EPAs describing the core work of an advanced IBD fellowship–trained physician have been established by a multisociety task force. Creating EPAs for an advanced curriculum comes with unique challenges, particularly the need to prevent duplication of prior training competencies while demonstrating the potential for unique milestones.

Background As treatments, management strategies, and the role of advanced practice providers (APPs) have evolved in recent years, the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation sought to understand the educational and resource needs of clinicians caring for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). The aim of this study was to describe the self-identified IBD knowledge and resource gaps of clinicians to inform the development of future programming. Methods A survey containing 19 questions created by the foundation’s Professional Education Committee, a subset of its National Scientific Advisory Committee, was conducted from September 7, 2018 to October 15, 2018. Responses were included from providers if they were currently seeing any IBD patients in a clinical setting. The foundation distributed the survey by email and various social media channels to encourage a diverse response. The survey included questions on comfort levels around diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with IBD, in addition to preferences and utilization of educational resources. The × 2 test was used to evaluate significant differences among respondents in the various domains surveyed. Results There were 197 eligible responses, of which 75% were from MD/Dos, followed by 25% APN/PA/RN/MSN/PhD/other; and 70% of respondents provide care for adult patients. The amount of time in practice was divided evenly among respondents. Fifty-seven percent of respondents practice in an academic/university setting, and approximately 75% indicated that ≥21% of their practice consisted of patients with IBD. Forty-four percent and 46% of respondents reported access to IBD based mental health providers and social workers in their practice, respectively. Seventy-two percent reported access to radiologists, 69% had access to dietitians, and 62% had access to advance practice providers. The areas of greatest educational need were prescribing medical cannabis (if approved locally) for pain management (62%); caring for patients with prior malignancy (35%); caring for pregnant patients and family planning (33%); caring for elderly patients (30%); and therapy decisions, including use of JAK inhibitors (29%), drug holidays (25%), and use of biosimilars (24%). More than 50% of respondents stated they do not participate in shared decision-making, citing time as the most common limiting factor. The majority of providers cited live education as their preferred learning format, and they wish to earn continuing medical education (CME) hours. Conclusion This survey helped identify current IBD educational needs in our professional community. With a rapidly changing treatment landscape and an increase in the diversity of providers delivering care, additional opportunities to keep abreast of practice changes are critical to providing comprehensive, quality care in IBD. Our survey demonstrated that shared decision-making is underutilized in practice due to a need for resources that aid in its efficient integration into practice. Based on our results, a focus on creating live learning opportunities that offer CME are needed in the areas of therapeutic decision-making and treating IBD in special subsets (eg, prior malignancy, pregnancy, elderly).

Background Combining biologics and small molecules could potentially overcome the plateau of drug efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and effectiveness of dual biologic therapy (DBT), or small molecule combined with a biologic therapy (SBT) in IBD patients. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Clinical trials.gov until November 3, 2020, including studies with 2 or more IBD patients on DBT or SBT. Main outcome was safety assessed as pooled rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) for each combination. Effectiveness was reported as pooled rates of clinical, endoscopic, and/or radiographic response and remission. The certainty of evidence was rated according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results Of the 3688 publications identified, 13 studies (1 clinical trial, 12 observational studies) involving 266 patients on 7 different combinations were included. Median number of prior biologics ranged from 0 to 4, and median duration of follow-up was 16–68 weeks. Most common DBT and SBT were vedolizumab (VDZ) with anti-tumor necrosis factor (aTNF, n = 56) or tofacitinib (Tofa, n = 57), respectively. Pooled rates of SAE for these were 9.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5–21.4) for VDZ-aTNF and 1.0% (95% CI, 0.0–7.6) for Tofa-VDZ. The overall certainty of evidence was very low due to the observational nature of the studies, and very serious imprecision and inconsistency. Conclusions DBT or SBT appears to be generally safe and may be effective in IBD patients, but the evidence is very uncertain.

Background Endoscopic postoperative recurrence (POR) of Crohn’s Disease (CD) following ileocolonic resection (ICR) is common; however, optimal treatment strategies of identified POR are unknown. We assessed the role of biologic therapy to treat endoscopic POR in a real-world cohort. Methods Retrospective cohort study of adult CD patients who underwent ICR from 2009–2020 at a tertiary center. Patients with endoscopic POR detected on postoperative colonoscopy and a subsequent follow-up colonoscopy were included. Patients were categorized by biologic therapy at time of POR and further sub-grouped by therapy modification after POR detection (no change, therapy optimization, or change in biologic class). Therapy optimization included: starting or modifying immunomodulator therapy, corticosteroids, or budesonide. POR was defined by Rutgeerts’ ≥ i2b. Results 203 CD patients (49.8% female, 15.4% > 1 prior ICR, 49.0% pre-operative biologic exposure) were included. Of these, 137 (67%) patients were not on biologic therapy at POR detection: 43% subsequently started a biologic, 23% optimized therapy, and 34% had no change. 66 (33%) patients were on anti-TNF at POR identification: 24% subsequently changed biologic class, 48% optimized anti-TNF, and 27% had no change (Figure 1). There was no difference in median time from ICR to POR detection (483 days, p=0.08) or inter-colonoscopy interval (483 days, p=0.25) between groups. In patients not on biologics at POR detection, those who started a biologic saw a 21% increase in subsequent endoscopic remission compared to those who optimized therapy (49.2% vs 28.1%, p=0.09) and a 12% increase compared to those who received no change (49.2% vs 37%). In patients not on biologics with severe POR (i3/i4, n=62), there was significantly higher remission rate by starting biologic therapy compared to optimizing existing therapy (53.3% vs 16.7%) or no change (53.3% vs 35.7%), p=0.04. In individuals receiving anti-TNF at time of POR, there was a 25% increase in endoscopic remission in patients who switched biologic class compared to those who optimized therapy (56.2% vs 31.2%) and a 34% increase compared to those with no change (56.2% vs 22.2%), p=0.1. Furthermore, significantly higher rates of improved Rutgeerts’ score were observed in switching biologic class compared to therapy optimization (68.8% vs 43.8%) or no change (68.8% vs 27.8%), p=0.04. Conclusion After endoscopic POR detection following ICR, initiating biologic therapy in individuals not previously receiving it, and changing mechanism of action in those already receiving anti-TNF, may improve clinical outcomes compared to alternative management strategies. If confirmed, these findings may inform optimal management strategies for endoscopic POR.

Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment paradigms recommend objective disease activity assessment and reactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) prior to changes in biologic therapy. We aimed to describe objective marker and TDM assessment in routine clinical practice prior to biologic therapeutic changes in adult IBD patients. Methods TARGET-IBD is a prospective longitudinal cohort of over 2100 IBD patients receiving usual care at 34 US academic or community centers enrolled between June 2017 and October 2019 who received biologic therapy and had a dose change or biologic discontinuation for lack of efficacy. Objective markers of disease activity within 12 weeks prior included fecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein (CRP), endoscopy, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). TDM data for infliximab or adalimumab was obtained. Results 525 patients (71.4% Crohn’s disease [CD], 28.6% ulcerative colitis [UC]) receiving biologic therapy underwent dose change (55.6%) or discontinuation (44.4%) for lack of efficacy. The majority were Caucasian (85.7%), 18–39 years old (52.2%), privately insured (81.5%), and at academic centers (73.7%). For dose changes, 67.5% had at least one objective disease activity assessment or TDM in the 12 weeks prior (CD 67.9%, UC 66.2%; P = 0.79). The most common objective marker was CRP in both CD (39.1%) and UC (54.5%). CRP and calprotectin were used significantly more in UC (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03). TDM was obtained in 30.7% (28.8% UC, 31.4% CD; P = 0.72) prior to dose change. For biologic discontinuation, 79.4% patients underwent objective assessment or TDM prior. In CD, CRP (46.3%) was most common, and CT (P = 0.03) and MRI (P P = 0.49) prior to discontinuation. Among all participants with dose change or discontinuation, endoscopy was performed in 29.3% with CD and 31.3% with UC. Academic care setting was associated with objective assessment before therapy change (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.01–2.50). Conclusion Nearly one-third of patients undergoing a biologic dose change or discontinuation do not undergo objective disease activity assessment or TDM. Assessment choice differs by disease. Future studies assessing the impact of such practices on long-term outcomes are needed.

Background: Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Here, we report steroid-free efficacy and safety with tofacitinib among patients with UC who received corticosteroids at baseline of the maintenance study (OCTAVE Sustain). Methods: This analysis included patients with clinical response following OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 who were re-randomized to receive placebo, or tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (b.d.), in OCTAVE Sustain for 52 weeks and were receiving corticosteroids at OCTAVE Sustain baseline. Corticosteroid tapering was mandatory during OCTAVE Sustain. Rates of steroid-free remission, endoscopic improvement, and clinical response were assessed, stratified by baseline characteristics. Adverse events (AEs) were stratified by treatment and steroid-free remission status. Results: Overall, 289/593 patients had corticosteroid use at OCTAVE Sustain baseline. At week 52, steroid-free remission, endoscopic improvement, and clinical response rates were 10.9%, 11.9%, and 17.8% among patients receiving placebo, 27.7%, 29.7%, and 40.6% among patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg b.d., and 27.6%, 29.9%, and 43.7% among patients receiving tofacitinib 10 mg b.d., respectively (non-responder imputation; all p Conclusion: For patients with baseline corticosteroid use in OCTAVE Sustain, the odds of achieving steroid-free efficacy endpoints were significantly higher for tofacitinib versus placebo, irrespective of tofacitinib dose. There were no apparent differences in AEs of special interest by steroid-free remission status. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01458574

Background With the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) becoming increasingly complex, incorporating preventive care health maintenance measures can be challenging. The aim of developing these updated recommendations is to provide more specific details to facilitate their use into a busy clinical practice setting. Method Fifteen statements were formulated with recommendations regarding the target, timing, and frequency of the health maintenance interventions in patients with IBD. We used a modified Delphi method and a literature review to establish a consensus among the panel of experts. The appropriateness of each health maintenance statement was rated on a scale of 1 to 5 (1–2 as inappropriate, and 4–5 as appropriate) by each panelist. Interventions were considered appropriate, and statements were accepted if ≥80% of the panelists agreed with a score ≥4. Results The panel approved 15 health maintenance recommendations for adults with IBD based on the current literature and expert opinion. These recommendations include explicit details regarding specific screening tools, timing of screening, and vaccinations for adults with IBD. Conclusions Patients with IBD are at an increased risk for infections, malignancies, and other comorbidities. Given the complexity of caring for patients with IBD, this focused list of recommendations can be easily incorporated in to clinical care to help eliminate the gap in preventative care for patients with IBD.

Background Crohn’s disease recurrence after ileocolic resection is common and graded with the Rutgeerts score. There is controversy whether anastomotic ulcers represent disease recurrence and should be included in the grading system. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of anastomotic ulcers on Crohn’s disease recurrence in patients with prior ileocolic resections. Secondary aims included defining the prevalence of anastomotic ulcers, risk factors for development, and their natural history. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing an ileocolic resection between 2008 and 2017 at a large academic center, with a postoperative colonoscopy assessing the neoterminal ileum and ileocolic anastomosis. The primary outcome was disease recurrence defined as endoscopic recurrence (>5 ulcers in the neoterminal ileum) or need for another ileocolic resection among patients with or without an anastomotic ulcer in endoscopic remission. Results One hundred eighty-two subjects with Crohn’s disease and an ileocolic resection were included. Anastomotic ulcers were present in 95 (52.2%) subjects. No factors were associated with anastomotic ulcer development. One hundred eleven patients were in endoscopic remission on the first postoperative colonoscopy. On multivariable analysis, anastomotic ulcers were associated with disease recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.64; 95% CI, 1.21–10.95; P = 0.02). Sixty-six subjects with anastomotic ulcers underwent a second colonoscopy, with 31 patients (79.5%) having persistent ulcers independent of medication escalation. Conclusion Anastomotic ulcers occur in over half of Crohn’s disease patients after ileocolic resection. No factors are associated with their development. They are associated with Crohn’s disease recurrence and are persistent.

BACKGROUND: The older patient with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is particularly vulnerable to consequences of disease and therapy-related side effects but little is known about the best treatment options in this population. AIM: To compare safety and efficacy of tumor necrosis factor α antagonist (anti-TNF) or vedolizumab (VDZ) in patients with IBD ≥ 60 years of age. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative (UC) initiating anti-TNF or VDZ therapy at ≥ 60 years of age at 3 study sites. We examined occurrence of infection or malignancy within 1 year after therapy as our primary outcome. Our efficacy outcomes included clinical remission at 3, 6, and 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for relevant confounders estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The study included 131 anti-TNF and 103 VDZ initiated patients (age range 60 – 88 years). Approximately half had CD. At 1 year, there were no significant differences in safety profile between the two therapeutic classes. Infections were observed in 20% of anti-TNF treated and 17% of VDZ treated patients (p=0.54). Pneumonia was the most common infection in both groups. While more anti-TNF treated CD patients were in remission at 3 months compared to VDZ (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.18 – 6.76), this difference was not maintained at 6 and 12 months suggesting similar efficacy of both classes. CONCLUSIONS: Both anti-TNF and VDZ therapy were similarly effective and safe in elderly IBD patients.

Background Data on care patterns for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from large-scale, diverse clinical cohorts in real-world practice are sparse. We developed a real-world cohort of patients receiving care at academic and community sites, for comparative study of therapies and natural history of IBD. Methods We describe novel methodology of central abstraction of clinical data into a real-world IBD registry with patient reported outcomes (PROs). Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, healthcare utilization, and disease metrics were assessed. Bivariate statistics were used to compare demographic and clinical data by Crohn disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) and site of care (academic, community). Results In 1 year, 1343 IBD patients (60.1% CD, 38.9% UC) were recruited from 27 academic (49.5%) and community (50.5%) sites, exceeding expectations (110% enrolled). Most participants also consented to provide PROs (59.5%) or biosamples (85.7%). Overall, 48.7% of the cohort provided a baseline PRO, and 62.6% provided a biosample. Compared to UC, CD subjects had higher prior (34.1% CD vs 7.7% UC; P < 0.001) and current (72.1% vs 47.9%; P < 0.001) biologic utilization. CD participants from academic sites had more complicated disease than those from community sites (62.5% vs 46.8% stricturing/penetrating; 33.5% vs 27% perianal; 36.8% vs 14.5% prior biologic, respectively). Nearly all (90.4%) participants had endoscopic data of whom 37.7% were in remission. One-year retention was 98.4%. Conclusions Centralized data abstraction and electronic PRO capture provided efficient recruitment into a large real-world observational cohort. This novel platform provides a resource for clinical outcomes and comparative effectiveness research in IBD.

Background & Aims This study compared the effectiveness of the Specific Carbohydrate Diet (SCD) to the Mediterranean diet (MD) as treatment for Crohn's disease (CD) with mild to moderate symptoms. Methods Adult patients with CD and with mild-to-moderate symptoms were randomly assigned 1:1 to consume the MD or SCD for 12 weeks. For the first 6 weeks, participants received prepared meals and snacks according to their assigned diet. After 6 weeks, participants were instructed to follow the diet independently. The primary outcome was symptomatic remission at week 6. Key secondary outcomes at week 6 included fecal calprotectin (FC) response (FC 50% among those with baseline FC >250 μg/g) and C-reactive protein (CRP) response (high-sensitivity CRP 50% reduction from baseline among those with high-sensitivity CRP >5 mg/L). Results The study randomized 194 patients, and 191 were included in the efficacy analyses. The percentage of participants who achieved symptomatic remission at week 6 was not superior with the SCD (SCD, 46.5%; MD, 43.5%; P = .77). FC response was achieved in 8 of 23 participants (34.8%) with the SCD and in 4 of 13 participants (30.8%) with the MD (P = .83). CRP response was achieved in 2 of 37 participants (5.4%) with the SCD and in 1 of 28 participants (3.6%) with the MD (P = .68). Conclusions The SCD was not superior to the MD to achieve symptomatic remission, FC response, and CRP response. CRP response was uncommon. Given these results, the greater ease of following the MD and other health benefits associated with the MD, the MD may be preferred to the SCD for most patients with CD with mild to moderate symptoms. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03058679

Background: Combining biologics and small molecules could potentially overcome the plateau of drug efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) to assess the safety and effectiveness of dual biologic therapy (DBT) or small molecule combined with a biologic therapy (SBT) in IBD patients. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Clinical trials.gov were reviewed from inception to Nov 3, 2020. Studies with two or more IBD patients on DBT or SBT were included while single-case reports were excluded. The main outcome was safety assessed as pooled rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) for each combination category. Effectiveness was reported as pooled rates of clinical, endoscopic and/or radiographic response and remission. Random-effects modeling was performed for between-study heterogeneity using the I² statistic. The SRMA was registered with PROSPERO (CRD4202018361). Findings: Of the 3,688 publications identified, 13 studies involving 266 patients on seven different combinations were included. Median number of prior biologics ranged from 0-4, and median duration of follow-up was 16-68 weeks. Most common DBT and SBT were vedolizumab (VDZ) with anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor (aTNF, n=56) or tofacitinib (Tofa, n=57), respectively. Pooled rates of SAE for these were 9·6% (95% CI, 1·5 – 21·4; 8 studies; I2 0%) for VDZ-aTNF and 1·0% (95% CI, 0·0 – 7·6; 5 studies; I2 0%) for Tofa-VDZ. Pooled clinical remission rates for these were 55·1% (95% CI, 19·6 – 88·5; 8 studies; 53 TTs; I2 81%) for VDZ-aTNF and 47·8% (95% CI, 19·0 – 77·4; 5 studies; 49 TTs; I2 69%) for Tofa-VDZ. No new safety signal was reported for any combination. There was considerable heterogeneity across studies (I2, 0 to 87%). Interpretation: DBT or SBT appears to be generally safe and effective in IBD patients with conclusions on effectiveness limited by between-study heterogeneity. This data needs to be confirmed in prospective studies. Registration: The SRMA was registered with PROSPERO (CRD4202018361). Funding Statement: None. Declaration of Interests: Kindra Clark-Snustad: Dr. Clark-Snustad reports personal fees from BMS, personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work; Anish Patel: Dr. Patel reports personal fees from JANSSEN, personal fees from TAKEDA, personal fees from ABBVIE, outside the submitted work; Andres Yarur: Dr. Yarur reports personal fees from Takeda, personal fees from Prometheus Bioscience, personal fees from Arena Pharmaceutical, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, during the conduct of the study; Benjamin L. Cohen: Dr. Cohen reports personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Pfizer, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Target RWE, personal fees from Sublimity Therapeutics, outside the submitted work; Matthew A. Ciorba: Dr. Ciorba reports grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Takeda, outside the submitted work; Scott D. Lee MD: Dr. Lee reports grants and personal fees from Abbvie, grants and personal fees from UCB, grants and personal fees from JANSSEN, grants and personal fees from TAKEDA, grants from BMS, grants from ABGENOMICS, grants and personal fees from ELI LILLY, grants from ARENA, outside the submitted work; Edward V. Loftus, Jr.: Dr. Loftus reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, personal fees from Allergan, grants and personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Arena, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants and personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Calibr, grants and personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from Celltrion Healthcare, personal fees from Eli Lilly, grants and personal fees from Genentech, grants and personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from Iterative Scopes, grants and personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Ono Pharma, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants from Receptos, grants from Robarts Clinical Trials, personal fees from Sun Pharma, grants and personal fees from Takeda, grants from Theravance, grants and personal fees from UCB, outside the submitted work; David Fudman: Dr. Fudman reports personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work; Bincy P. Abraham: Dr. Abraham reports personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Ferring, grants and personal fees from Takeda, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Medtronics, personal fees from Samsung bioepis, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, outside the submitted work; Jean-Frederic Colombel: Dr. Colombel reports grants and personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Allergan, personal fees from Arena Phramaceuticals, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Bristol-Myers-Squibb, personal fees from Celgene Corporation, personal fees from Celltrion, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Enterome, personal fees from Ferring Phramaceuticals, personal fees from Genentech, personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from Iterative Scopes, personal fees from Ipsen, personal fees from Immunic, personal fees from Imtbio, personal fees from Inotrem, grants and personal fees from Janssen Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Landos, personal fees from Limmatech, personal fees from Medimmune, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from OMass, personal fees from Otsuka, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Shire, grants and personal fees from Takeda, personal fees from Tigenix, personal fees from VielaBio, outside the submitted work; Parakkal Deepak: Dr. Deepak reports personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Prometheus Biosciences, other from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Arena Pharmaceuticals, grants from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, grants from Arena Pharmaceuticals, grants from Bristol Myers Squibb-Celgene, grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work; All other authors declare no competing interests.