Search

BACKGROUNDThe evolution of ischemic stroke is different according to sex and is one of the main causes of death in women. In the literature, it is not clear if this is due to biological differences or to disparities in medical care. Previous studies have shown that women are less likely to receive acute treatment, and stroke center type is an important predictor of door-to-needle times. We investigated whether women are attended in a similar way to men in the telestroke network with specialized stroke physicians.METHODSA prospective registry of ischemic strokes recorded in the centralized Andalusian telestroke network (CATI) was analyzed, focusing on sex differences. Demographic data, clinical characteristics (risk factors), neuroimaging data, treatment intervals, and clinical results (the modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score) were collected. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the mRS at 90 days.RESULTSA total of 3009 suspected stroke patients were attended to in the telestroke network in the last three years, of which 42.74% were women. A total of 69.54% of the men and 63.85% of the women were diagnosed with ischemic stroke (p=0.002). Women were older (p>0.001) and less independent upon arrival (p=0.006) than men. There was no difference in the treatment received or in the treatment intervals between the groups. Importantly, there was no difference in mRS scores at 3 months between sexes. However, at follow-up, women had fewer imaging tests (p = 0.018) and fewer outpatient visits (pCONCLUSIONSNo significant difference between men and women has been found in the acute treatment of stroke in a large telestroke network. However, the same is not true for the follow-up and management of patients after the acute phase. This fact supports that strict adherence to protocols, training, and specialization of care and providing equal attention prevents sex differences in stroke treatment and functional outcomes.

Background: Neurologic impairment persisting months after acute severe SARS-CoV-2 infection has been described because of several pathogenic mechanisms, including persistent systemic inflammation. The objective of this study is to analyze the selective involvement of the different cognitive domains, it impacts on quality of life and the possible existence of related biomarkers.Methods: Cross-sectional study of patients who survived severe infection with SARS-CoV-2 consecutively recruited from 13 neurology services in Spain between 90 and 120 days after hospital discharge. All patients underwent an exhaustive study of cognitive functions as well as plasma determination of pro-inflammatory factors (chemokines), and neurotrophic factors and light-chain neurofilaments. A Principal Component Analysis extracted the main independent characteristics of the syndrome.Results: 152 patients were recruited. The results of our study show a pattern of cognitive impairment with preferential involvement of episodic and working memory, executive functions, and attention and relatively less affectation of information processing speed, denomination, verbal fluency, and other cortical functions. In addition, psychiatric affectation such as anxiety and depression pictures are constant in our cohort. Several plasma chemokines concentrations were elevated compared with both, a non-SARS-Cov2 infected cohort of neurological outpatients or a control healthy general population, suggesting a pro-inflammatory chronic state derived of viral infection.Conclusion: The neurologic Subacute Impairment in severe Covid-19 consist in an amnesic and dysexecutive syndrome with neuropsychiatric manifestations. We do not know if the deficits detected can persist in the long term and, in this case, if this can trigger or accelerate the onset of neurodegenerative diseases.

Objetivo. Elaborar unas recomendaciones basadas en evidencias cientificas y en consenso de los autores y revisores, que aborden las cuestiones basicas acerca de la combinacion de farmacos antiepilepticos. Desarrollo. Un comite de 11 expertos pertenecientes a la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia (SAdE), constituido por siete neurologos, tres neuropediatras y un neurologo-neurofisiologo, todos con especial competencia en epilepsia, promovieron la realizacion de una revision bibliografica exhaustiva entre 55 expertos en epilepsia pertenecientes a la SAdE, en busca de evidencias disponibles relacionadas con temas diagnosticos o terapeuticos en epilepsia. La guia se estructuro en 35 capitulos. Uno de los capitulos abordo la combinacion de farmacos antiepilepticos en el tratamiento de la epilepsia. Basandose en 77 citas bibliograficas y en la opinion consensuada de autores y revisores, se confecciono una serie de recomendaciones de facil aplicacion. Conclusiones. La combinacion de farmacos antiepilepticos en los pacientes con epilepsia cuyas crisis no estan controladas con un solo farmaco puede conseguir en numerosas ocasiones que entren en remision. Existe una serie de factores relacionados con el tipo de epilepsia y caracteristicas del paciente y con los farmacos antiepilepticos que se van a utilizar en combinacion que pueden favorecer el exito terapeutico. Se debe evitar en lo posible el sobretratamiento con la combinacion de farmacos antiepilepticos. Los resultados de esta revision proveen unas recomendaciones sobre el tratamiento combinado con farmacos antiepilepticos, basadas en evidencias cientificas y en el consenso de los autores, utiles, sencillas y aplicables en los diferentes niveles asistenciales.