Search

Simple Summary: Non-classical human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) are molecules that help control the immune system's response to cancer. While classical HLAs have been studied for their role in detecting and fighting tumors, non-classical HLAs—specifically HLA-E, HLA-F, HLA-G, and HLA-H—are less understood but appear to play unique roles in helping tumors evade the immune system. This review examines how these non-classical HLAs contribute to cancer progression and discusses their potential as new targets for cancer treatments. By exploring the specific functions of HLA-E, HLA-F, HLA-G, and HLA-H in various cancers, the authors aim to highlight their importance in the immune system's interaction with tumors. Human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) are essential regulators of immune responses against cancer, with classical HLAs well-documented for their role in tumor recognition and immune surveillance. In recent years, non-classical HLAs—including HLA-E, HLA-F, HLA-G, and HLA-H—have emerged as critical players in the immune landscape of cancer due to their diverse and less conventional functions in immune modulation. These molecules exhibit unique mechanisms that enable tumors to escape immune detection, promote tumor progression, and contribute to therapeutic resistance. This review provides a comprehensive examination of the current understanding of non-classical HLAs in solid cancers, focusing on their specific roles in shaping the tumor microenvironment and influencing immune responses. By analyzing how HLA-E, HLA-F, HLA-G, and HLA-H modulate interactions with immune cells, such as T cells, natural killer cells, and antigen-presenting cells, we highlight key pathways through which these molecules contribute to immune evasion and metastasis. Additionally, we review promising therapeutic strategies aimed at targeting non-classical HLAs, including emerging immunotherapies that could potentially enhance cancer treatment outcomes by reversing immune suppression within tumors. Understanding the influence of these non-classical HLAs in solid cancers may offer new insights into cancer immunology and may lead to the development of innovative and more effective immunotherapeutic approaches. This review underscores the importance of non-classical HLAs as potential therapeutic targets, providing a necessary foundation for future studies in the evolving field of cancer immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and objectives: Second-line treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is primarily guided by the time elapsed since the last platinum dose. Rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide has demonstrated superior outcomes compared to topotecan if the platinum-free interval (PFI) is longer than 90 days and is considered the standard of care. However, these findings predate the chemo-immunotherapy era. This study investigates the effectiveness of the rechallenge strategy after chemo-immunotherapy in a real-world setting. Design and methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with the extensive stage (ES)-SCLC who received rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide after first-line chemoimmunotherapy between September 2020 and August 2023 in nine European centres. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analysed. Results: A total of 93 patients were included. Sixty-six (71%) patients had a PFI between 3 and 6 months. Consolidation thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation had been administered in 31 (33.3%) patients and 20 (21.5%) patients, respectively. Overall response rate was 59.1%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3–5.7) and median overall survival (OS) was 7 months (95% CI 5.7–8.3). Notably, PFS and OS were not different according to PFI (3–6 m vs > 6 m). Conclusion: Rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide is a valid second-line option in patients with ES-SCLC whose disease progresses after first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Our analysis shows similar results to previous studies. Furthermore, outcomes were consistent across patients with different PFIs, confirming its efficacy in patients with a PFI longer than 3 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oncogene-negative, PDL1-negative metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents significant treatment challenges due to its complexity and resistance to conventional therapies. The case report presented addresses a 55-year-old male patient with oncogene-negative, PDL1-negative stage IV lung adenocarcinoma, showcasing an exceptional complete metabolic response to a multimodality treatment combining double immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and chemotherapy, followed by salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The patient underwent a treatment regimen incorporating two cycles of carboplatin, pemetrexed, nivolumab, and ipilimumab followed by nivolumab, and ipilimumab maintenance. After a partial response, SBRT was applied to persistent lesions, achieving a complete metabolic response. This case highlights the potential of combining dual ICI with chemotherapy and SBRT in treating oncogene-negative, PDL1-negative NSCLC underscoring the importance of multimodality treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spain's cancer care is at a crossroads! The CCI4EU initiative promises progress, but could it widen the gap for rural and vulnerable communities? Balancing innovation with access is crucial! #CancerCare #HealthcareAccess #Spain #CCI4EU #HealthEquality.