Search

Introduction: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines recommended thyroid lobectomy (TL) as an alternative to total thyroidectomy (TT) for the surgical treatment of low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer. Increasing use of TL has since been reported despite concerns for an increased risk of disease recurrence and need for reoperation. This study sought to compare reoperation rates among patients who underwent initial TL or TT for malignancy, characterize trends at centers based on operative volume, and examine factors associated with reoperation. Methods: We queried the Vizient Clinical Data Base for TL and TT performed preguideline change (pre-GC = 2013-2015) and postguideline change (post-GC = 2016-2021). Reoperations included reoperative thyroid surgery (RTS) and neck dissection (ND); timing was defined as early (≤180 days), thought to indicate inadequacy of initial operative choice, or late (>180 days), suggesting potential disease recurrence. Results: Of 65,627 patients, 31.8% underwent initial TL and 68.2% underwent initial TT; TL increased from 21.4% of total cases pre-GC to 37.0% post-GC ( p < 0.001). Among TL patients, early RTS declined from 33.9% to 14.2% and ND declined from 0.8% to 0.4% ( p < 0.001). Among TT patients, early RTS remained 0.2%, while ND increased from 0.4% to 0.7% ( p < 0.001). TL-associated late RTS declined from 2.0% to 1.7%, while ND increased from 0.6% to 0.8% ( p = 0.17). In TT patients, both late RTS and ND increased, from 0.2% to 0.3% ( p = 0.04) and 1.7% to 2.1% ( p < 0.01), respectively. There was no difference in the late reoperation rate for TL compared with TT post-GC (+0.2%, p = 0.18). TL volume grew annually by 12.5% [8.9-16.2%] at high-volume centers (HVCs) and 8.3% [5.6-11.1%] at low-volume centers (LVCs). TL-associated reoperations at HVCs declined annually by 12.6% [5.6-19.0%] and 10.8% [2.7-18.1%] at LVCs. Uninsured status and more recent initial operation were associated with an increased risk of late reoperation (HR = 1.84 [1.06-3.20] and HR = 1.30 [1.24-1.36], respectively). The type of index operation performed, however, was not predictive of late reoperation. Conclusions: The rate of early reoperations declined for TL after the 2015 ATA guideline release, but late reoperations remained unchanged despite a significant shift in practice patterns towards initial lobectomy. Patients appear to be receiving less aggressive, guideline-concordant care without a significant increase in the late reoperation rate for TL compared with TT.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted routine health care, including many elective and non-cancer operations in the United States. Most hepato-pancreato-biliary malignancy patients require outpatient imaging, tissue sampling, and staging, and many undergo neoadjuvant therapy before operative intervention. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on hepato-pancreato-biliary oncologic operations and to determine whether trends in neoadjuvant therapy were altered by the pandemic., Methods: Adult patients in the United States undergoing oncologic operations for pancreatic, primary and secondary hepatic malignancies, with or without neoadjuvant therapy, were extracted from the Vizient Clinical Data Base. Control chart analysis was used to plot trends over time and to determine whether changes were statistically significant. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests also compared monthly operative volume from pre-pandemic (12 month) and pandemic (28 months) periods., Results: A total of 36,553 patients were identified over 40 months. Mean monthly pancreatic oncologic operations were unaffected by the pandemic (P = .257). Operations for pancreatic oncologic operations with prior neoadjuvant therapy increased throughout the pandemic (P = .002). Oncologic operations for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies were significantly reduced for 4 and 2 months, respectively, at the beginning of the pandemic but returned to their pre-pandemic baseline within 4 months (P = .169 and P = .598)., Conclusion: Pancreatic operation volumes for cancer did not change, but pancreatic operations after neoadjuvant therapy continued to increase during the pandemic. Operations for hepatic malignancy were transiently disrupted but quickly normalized. These observations suggest that surgery for hepato-pancreato-biliary malignancies was prioritized during the pandemic., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Insurance-based disparities in access to thyroidectomy are well established. Patients undergoing thyroidectomy by high-volume surgeons have fewer complications and better postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of Medicaid expansion with access to high-volume centers for thyroidectomy for benign disease., Methods: The Vizient Clinical Data Base was queried for adult operations for benign thyroid disease from 2010 to 2019. Centers were sorted by volume into quartiles. Difference-in-difference analysis evaluated changes in insurance populations in expansion and non-expansion states after Medicaid expansion. Odds of patients undergoing operations in the 4 volume quartiles after stratifying by insurance and Medicaid expansion status were calculated., Results: A total of 82,602 patients underwent operations at 364 centers. Expansion states increased Medicaid coverage in all volume quartiles compared to non-expansion states after Medicaid expansion (Q1, +4.87%, Q2, +5.35%, Q3, +8.57%, Q4, +4.62%, P < .002 for all). After Medicaid expansion, Medicaid patients had higher odds of undergoing operation at lower volume hospitals compared to the highest volume centers in both expansion states (Q1, ref, Q2, 1.82, Q3, 1.76, Q4, 1.67, P < .001) and non-expansion states (Q1, ref, Q2, 1.54, Q3, 2.04, Q4, 1.44, P < .001). Privately insured patients were most likely to undergo their operation at the highest volume centers in all states (E: Q1, ref, Q2, 0.78, Q3, 0.74, Q4, 0.66, P < .001; NE: Q1, ref, Q2, 0.89, Q3, 0.58, Q4, 0.85, P < .001)., Conclusion: Medicaid expansion increased Medicaid coverage in expansion states, but Medicaid patients in both expansion and non-expansion states were less likely to be operated on at the highest volume centers compared to privately insured patients. Persistent barriers to accessing high-volume care still exists for Medicaid patients., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines recommend lymph node mapping US in patients with definitive cytological evidence of thyroid cancer. Suspicious lymph node features on imaging including enlarged size (>1 cm in any dimension), architectural distortion, loss of fatty hilum, and microcalcifications often prompt evaluation with fine needle aspiration. There is no universally agreed upon model for determining which ultrasound characteristics most strongly correlate with metastatic disease., Methods: A retrospective review of patients with confirmed papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) undergoing lymph node mapping ultrasound from 2013 to 2019 was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were calculated for each individual ultrasound characteristic as well as for characteristic combinations., Results: Data from 119 lymph nodes were included. Malignant lymph nodes were more likely to be enlarged (71% versus 61%, P < 0.001) and to have each individual suspicious feature. Loss of fatty hilum had the highest sensitivity (89%) but was not specific (19%) for metastatic disease. Architectural distortion was found to have the highest specificity (87%). A combination of the four features was found to have higher specificity (97%) and PPV (88%) than any individual feature or combination of two/three features., Conclusions: A combination of four sonographic features correlates with metastatic PTC to lymph nodes and has the highest specificity and PPV for malignancy. A risk stratification model based on these features may lead to better classification of ultrasound findings in PTC patients with concern for nodal metastases., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinomas (MAA) and non-mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinomas (NMAA) demonstrate differences in rates and patterns of recurrence, which may inform the appropriate extent of surgical resection (i.e., appendectomy versus colectomy). The impact of extent of resection on disease-specific survival (DSS) for each histologic subtype was assessed., Patients and Methods: Patients with resected, non-metastatic MAA and NMAA were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000-2020). Multivariable models were created to examine predictors of colectomy for each histologic subtype. DSS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and examined using Cox proportional hazards modeling., Results: Among 4674 patients (MAA: n = 1990, 42.6%; NMAA: n = 2684, 57.4%), the majority (67.8%) underwent colectomy. Among colectomy patients, the rate of nodal positivity increased with higher T-stage (MAA: T1: 4.6%, T2: 4.0%, T3: 17.1%, T4: 21.6%, p < 0.001; NMAA: T1: 6.8%, T2: 11.4%, T3: 25.6%, T4: 43.8%, p < 0.001) and higher tumor grade (MAA: well differentiated: 7.7%, moderately differentiated: 19.2%, and poorly differentiated: 31.3%; NMAA: well differentiated: 9.0%, moderately differentiated: 20.5%, and 44.4%; p < 0.001). Nodal positivity was more frequently observed in NMAA (27.6% versus 16.4%, p < 0.001). Utilization of colectomy was associated with improved DSS for NMAA patients with T2 (log rank p = 0.095) and T3 (log rank p = 0.018) tumors as well as moderately differentiated histology (log rank p = 0.006). Utilization of colectomy was not associated with improved DSS for MAA patients, which was confirmed in a multivariable model for T-stage, grade, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.22]., Conclusions: Colectomy was associated with improved DSS for patients with NMAA but not MAA. Colectomy for MAA may not be required., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This review delves into the intricate landscape of pleural mesothelioma (PM), emphasizing the need for nuanced therapeutic strategies. While platinum-based chemotherapy remains a cornerstone, the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), notably through the Checkmate 743 trial, has reshaped treatment paradigms. Challenges persist due to patient heterogeneity and a lack of specific biomarkers. Targeting genotypic and phenotypic alterations emerges as a promising avenue, demanding precision oncology in this rare disease. CDKN2A loss, prevalent in PM, may respond to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Defects in MMR and HR suggest tailored approaches with ICI or PARP inhibitors, respectively. Ongoing trials explore novel inhibitors and promising targets like mesothelin. Implementing these strategies requires overcoming challenges in patient selection, combination therapies, biomarker identification, and cost considerations. Collaboration is crucial for transforming these insights into impactful clinical interventions, heralding the era of personalized and precision medicine for PM., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is a common practice to reduce gastro-esophageal adverse events associated with drug treatments but may impair absorption and exposure to oncology drugs. This study investigated the effect of concomitant administration of PPIs and pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib on survival of patients with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mRCC)., Patients and Methods: Total 451 patients receiving pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib as first line treatment were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were defined as "no concomitant PPIs (PPI-)" if no PPIs were administered during TKIs, and as "concomitant PPIs (PPI+)" if the administration of PPIs was at least 75% of the time during which TKIs were given., Results: Eighty patients administered pazopanib were PPI- and 86 PPI+; no difference in PFS was observed (10.7 vs. 11.9 months, P = .79). If patients were stratified as short (n = 89) and long (n = 77) responders, there was a significant difference in terms of PFS in PPI+ (n = 47) versus PPI- (n = 30) in long responders, being 24.7 versus 38 months (P = .04), respectively. In the sunitinib cohort, no significant difference of PFS in PPI+ (n = 102) versus PPI- (n = 131) was found, being 11.3 versus 18.1 months, respectively (P=0.15). In the cabozantinib cohort, there was a statistically significant difference in PFS of PPI+ versus PPI- (6 months vs. not reached, P = .04). No correlation with adverse events was found., Conclusions: This study demonstrates an association between PPIs and impaired PFS in mRCC patients given pazopanib and cabozantinib and recommends caution on their concomitant use., Competing Interests: Disclosure CP acted as a consultant and/or a speaker for Angelini Pharma, Biorek, BMS, Eisai, General Electric, Ipsen, Medendi, and MSD, and as a protocol steering committee member for BMS, Eisai, and MSD. MR received honoraria as a speaker/consultant by Astra Zeneca, MSD, BMS, Janssen, Merck and Gilead. MDR received fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, Bio-Rad, Janssen, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche, and Ipsen; RD reports receiving speaker bureau/advisor's fee from Ipsen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Gilead, Lilly, Gilead, and EUSA Pharma. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: The tall cell, columnar, and diffuse sclerosing subtypes are aggressive histologic subtypes of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) with increasing incidence, yet there is a wide variation in reporting. We aimed to identify and compare factors associated with the reporting of these aggressive subtypes (aPTC) to classic PTC (cPTC) and secondarily identify differences in outcomes., Methods: The National Cancer Database was utilized to identify cPTC and aPTC from 2004 to 2017. Patient and facility demographics and clinicopathologic variables were analyzed. Independent predictors of aPTC reporting were identified and a survival analysis was performed., Results: The majority of aPTC (67%) were reported by academic facilities. Compared to academic facilities, all other facility types were 1.4-2.0 times less likely to report aPTC (P < 0.05). Regional variation in reporting was noted, with more cases reported in the Middle Atlantic, despite there being more total facilities in the South Atlantic and East North Central regions. Compared to the Middle Atlantic, all other regions were 1.4-5 times less likely to report aPTC (P < 0.001). Patient characteristics including race and income were not associated with aPTC reporting. Compared to cPTC, aPTC had higher rates of aggressive features and worse 5-y overall survival (90.5% versus 94.5%, log rank P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Aggressive subtypes of PTC are associated with worse outcomes. Academic and other facilities in the Middle Atlantic were more likely to report aPTC. This suggests the need for further evaluation of environmental or geographic factors versus a need for increased awareness and more accurate diagnosis of these subtypes., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Racial and ethnic disparities have been observed in the multidisciplinary management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm is the most common identifiable precursor to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, where early surgical intervention before the development of an invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm improves survival. The association of race/ethnicity with the risk of identifying invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms during resection has not been previously defined., Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program targeted pancreatectomy database (2014-2021) was queried for patients with race/ethnicity data who underwent resection of an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. Backward Wald logistic regression modeling (P ≤ 0.05 for entry; P > .10 for removal) was used to identify independent predictors of invasion., Results: A total of 4,505 cases of resected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms were identified, with 923 (20.5%) demonstrating invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. The cohort of individuals other than non-Hispanic Whites were significantly more likely to have invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (White, 19.9%; Black, 24.2%; Asian, 23.7%; Hispanic, 22.6%; P = .026). Such disparity could not be explained by greater comorbidity, as non-White patients were significantly younger (age <65 years: 41.7% vs 33.2%, P < .001) and had better physical status (American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≤2: 28.8% vs 25.2%, P = .053). After controlling for clinicodemographic variables, being an individual of race/ethnicity other than White was independently associated with higher odds of invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (odds ratio, 1.280; 95% confidence interval, 1.046-1.566; P = .017). No differences in postoperative morbidity were observed., Conclusion: In a national cohort of patients with resected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, individuals who identified as being of race/ethnicity other than White were significantly more likely to have invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms during surgical resection., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved outcomes in various cancers. ICI treatment is associated with the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) which can affect any organ. Data on irAEs occurrence in relation to sex- differentiation and their association with gender-specific factors are limited., Aims: The primary objective of the G-DEFINER study is to compare the irAEs incidence in female and male patients who undergo ICI treatment. Secondary objectives are: to compare the irAEs incidence in pre- and postmenopausal female patients; to compare the irAEs incidence in female and male patients according to different clinical and gender-related factors (lifestyle, psychosocial, and behavioral factors). Exploratory objectives of the study are to compare and contrast hormonal, gene-expression, SNPs, cytokines, and gut microbiota profiles in relation to irAEs incidence in female and male patients., Methods and Results: The patients are recruited from Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Italy, St Vincent's University Hospital, Ireland, Oslo University Hospital, Norway, and Karolinska Insitutet/Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. The inclusion of patients was delayed due to the Covid pandemic, leading to a total of 250 patients recruited versus a planned number of 400 patients. Clinical and translational data will be analyzed., Interpretation: The expected outcomes are to improve the management of cancer patients treated with ICIs, leading to more personalized clinical approaches that consider potential toxicity profiles. The real world nature of the trial makes it highly applicable for timely irAEs diagnosis.

Introduction: Several anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been developed for the treatment of echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with the newer generation agents brigatinib, alectinib and lorlatinib showing prolonged responses. With the increasing number of target therapies available, the optimal sequence is yet to be defined, as resistance profiles may evolve over time and in response to sequential ALK inhibitors. Therefore, ALK-targeted strategies may be personalized based upon the presence of specific ALK resistance mutations., Methods: Here, we report on the case of a patient who has been treated with a sequence of three ALK TKIs after receiving diagnosis of ALK-rearranged metastatic NSCLC in 2015 and gained further benefit upon lorlatinib rechallenge after the acquisition of the G1202R resistance mutation to second generation TKIs., Results and Conclusion: In this case, the first ALK resistance mutation detected after progression on first line TKI, the I1171N, is a common resistance mutation after alectinib and confers sensitivity to brigatinib, that the patient received afterwards with a long-term disease stability. The second ALK resistance mutation detected after a chemotherapy interval, the G1202R, is the most common resistance mutation after second generation ALK TKIs and has been associated with sensitivity to third generation TKIs, such as lorlatinib. This case of a patient with EML4-ALK-rearranged NSCLC shows that sequential treatment with next-generation ALK TKIs, including rechallenge, can induce profound remissions, even in heavily pretreated patients, and that ALK-targeted strategies may be personalized by considering the presence of distinct ALK resistance mutations., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: 2%-10% of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) who undergo parathyroidectomy develop persistent/recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to determine which preoperative localization method is most cost-effective in reoperative PHPT., Methods: Clinical decision analytic models comparing cost-effectiveness of localizing studies in reoperative PHPT were constructed using TreeAge Pro. Cost and probability assumptions were varied via Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis (PSA) to test the robustness of the base case models., Results: Base case analysis of model 1 revealed ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration with PTH assay as most cost-effective after localizing US. This was confirmed on PSA of model 1. Model 2 showed four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) as most cost-effective after negative US. If not localized by US, on PSA, 4D-CT was the next most cost-effective test., Conclusions: US-guided FNA with PTH is the most cost-effective confirmatory test after US localization. 4D-CT should be considered as the next best test after negative US., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context: The significance of low mitotic activity in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is largely undefined., Objective: We aimed to determine the behavioral landscape of PTC with low mitotic activity compared to that of no- and high-mitotic activity., Methods: A single-institution consecutive series of PTC patients from 2018-2022 was reviewed. Mitotic activity was defined as no mitoses, low (1-2 mitoses/2 mm2) or high (≥3 mitoses/2 mm2) per the World Health Organization. The 2015 American Thyroid Association risk stratification was applied to the cohort, and clinicopathologic features were compared between groups. For patients with ≥6 months follow-up, Cox regression analyses for recurrence were performed., Results: 640 PTCs were included - 515 (80.5%) no mitotic activity, 110 (17.2%) low mitotic activity, and 15 (2.3%) high mitotic activity. Overall, low mitotic activity exhibited rates of clinicopathologic features including vascular invasion, gross extrathyroidal extension, and lymph node metastases in between those of no- and high-mitotic activity. PTCs with low mitotic activity had higher rates of intermediate- and high-risk ATA risk stratification compared to those with no mitotic activity (p < 0.001). Low mitotic activity PTCs also had higher recurrence rates (15.5% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001). Low mitotic activity was associated with recurrence, independent of the ATA risk stratification (HR 2.96; 95% CI 1.28-6.87, p = 0.01)., Conclusions: Low mitotic activity is relatively common in PTC and its behavior lies within a spectrum between no- and high-mitotic activity. Given its association with aggressive clinicopathologic features and recurrence, low mitotic activity should be considered when risk stratifying PTC patients for recurrence., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Despite several therapeutic efforts, lung cancer remains a highly lethal disease. Novel therapeutic approaches encompass immune-checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapeutics and antibody-drug conjugates, with different results. Several studies have been aimed at identifying biomarkers able to predict benefit from these therapies and create a prediction model of response, despite this there is a lack of information to help clinicians in the choice of therapy for lung cancer patients with advanced disease. This is primarily due to the complexity of lung cancer biology, where a single or few biomarkers are not sufficient to provide enough predictive capability to explain biologic differences; other reasons include the paucity of data collected by single studies performed in heterogeneous unmatched cohorts and the methodology of analysis. In fact, classical statistical methods are unable to analyze and integrate the magnitude of information from multiple biological and clinical sources (eg, genomics, transcriptomics, and radiomics)., Methods and Objectives: APOLLO11 is an Italian multicentre, observational study involving patients with a diagnosis of advanced lung cancer (NSCLC and SCLC) treated with innovative therapies. Retrospective and prospective collection of multiomic data, such as tissue- (eg, for genomic, transcriptomic analysis) and blood-based biologic material (eg, ctDNA, PBMC), in addition to clinical and radiological data (eg, for radiomic analysis) will be collected. The overall aim of the project is to build a consortium integrating different datasets and a virtual biobank from participating Italian lung cancer centers. To face with the large amount of data provided, AI and ML techniques will be applied will be applied to manage this large dataset in an effort to build an R-Model, integrating retrospective and prospective population-based data. The ultimate goal is to create a tool able to help physicians and patients to make treatment decisions., Conclusion: APOLLO11 aims to propose a breakthrough approach in lung cancer research, replacing the old, monocentric viewpoint towards a multicomprehensive, multiomic, multicenter model. Multicenter cancer datasets incorporating common virtual biobank and new methodologic approaches including artificial intelligence, machine learning up to deep learning is the road to the future in oncology launched by this project., Competing Interests: Disclosures Arsela Prelaj certifies that all conflicts of interest reported can be considered outside the present paper: consulting or advisory role for BMS, AstraZeneca; had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed by Roche, Italfarmaco; principal investigator of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals. Alessandra Laura Giulia Pedrocchi holds shares of Agade srl. Giuseppe Lo Russo has received fees for acting as a consultant from Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Amgen, Sanofi, Italfarmaco, Pfizer; has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Amgen, Sanofi, has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche, BMS, MSD; has participated on data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, has acted as principal investigator in sponsored clinical trials for Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, GSK, Amgen, Sanofi. Rossana Berardi has received fees for acting as a consultant, for lectures and/or for participating to advisory board from BI, EISAI, GSK, Italfarmaco, Otsuka, Lilly, MSD; has received funding to Institution from AZ, BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche; AMGEN. Giulia Galli declares the following conflicts of interest: Italpharma (advisory board); Roche (travel accommodation); Astra Zeneca, BMS, MSD (honoraria for lectures). Federica Bertolini has received consultant fees from MSD, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly, Eisai, Sanofi and speakers fee from BMS, MSD, Astra Zeneca. Filippo de Braud reports a patent for PCT/IB2020/055956 pending and a patent for IT201900009954 pending; and Roche, EMD Serono, NMS Nerviano Medical Science, Sanofi, MSD, Novartis, Incyte, BMS, Menarini Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Merck Group, Pfizer, Servier, AMGEN, Incyte. No disclosures were reported by the other authors., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: For some cancer operations, center volume is associated with improved patient outcomes. Whether this association is true for cytoreductive surgery/heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is unclear. Given the rapidly expanding use of CRS/HIPEC, the aim of this analysis was to determine whether a volume-outcome relationship exists for this strategy., Methods: The Vizient Clinical Database® was queried for CRS/HIPEC cases from January 2020 through December 2022. Low-, medium-, and high-volume designations were made by sorting hospitals by case volume and creating equal tertiles based on total number of cases. Analysis was performed via one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey test, as indicated., Results: In the 36-month study period, 5165 cases were identified across 149 hospitals. Low- (n = 113), medium- (n = 25), and high-volume (n = 11) centers performed a median of 4, 21, and 47 cases per annum, respectively. Most cases were performed for appendiceal (39.3%) followed by gynecologic neoplasms (20.4%). Groups were similar with respect to age, gender, race, comorbidities, and histology. Low-volume centers were more likely to utilize the ICU post-operatively (59.6% vs. 40.5% vs. 36.3%; p = 0.02). No differences were observed in morbidity (9.4% vs. 7.1% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.71), mortality (0.9% vs. 0.6% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.93), length of stay (9.3 vs. 9.4 vs. 10 days, p = 0.83), 30-day readmissions (5.6% vs. 5.6% vs. 5.6%, p = 1.0), or total cost among groups., Conclusions: No association was found between CRS/HIPEC hospital volume and post-operative outcomes. These data suggest that in academic medical centers with HIPEC programs, outcomes for commonly treated cancers are not associated with hospital volume., (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the United States (US) healthcare system. Endocrine operations are predominantly elective and were likely affected. Therefore, our aim was to determine the effect of the pandemic on endocrine operations., Study Design: The Vizient Clinical Data Base® was examined for cases from 1/2019-12/2022 using ICD10 and CPT codes for thyroid, parathyroid, and adrenal operations. Control chart analysis identified trends in operative volume. Negative binomial regression was utilized to analyze demographic trends., Results: Monthly volumes for all operations from 515 hospitals decreased at the beginning of 2020, except for operations for adrenal malignancy. Inpatient operations (Thyroid -17.1%, Parathyroid -20.9%, p ​< ​0.001 for both) experienced more significant and longer lasting disruptions than outpatient operations (Thyroid -2.6%, p ​= ​0.883, Parathyroid -9.1%, p ​= ​0.098)., Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted endocrine operations across the US. While all adrenal operations and outpatient thyroid and parathyroid operations have returned to pre-pandemic levels, inpatient operations for thyroid and parathyroid remain decreased., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest This article has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. All authors have no conflicts of interest and agree to participation and publication., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)