Search

Purpose:We evaluated the predictive value of pretreatment ctDNA to inform therapeutic outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma relative to type and line of treatment.Experimental Design:Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was quantified in 125 samples collected from 110 patients prior to commencing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as first- (n = 32) or second-line (n = 27) regimens, or prior to commencing first-line BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy (n = 66). An external validation cohort included 128 patients commencing ICI therapies in the first- (N = 77) or second-line (N = 51) settings.Results:In the discovery cohort, low ctDNA (≤20 copies/mL) prior to commencing therapy predicted longer progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with first-line ICIs [HR, 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07–0.53; P < 0.0001], but not in the second-line setting. An independent cohort validated that ctDNA is predictive of PFS in the first-line setting (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22–0.83; P = 0.006), but not in the second-line ICI setting. Moreover, ctDNA prior to commencing ICI treatment was not predictive of PFS for patients pretreated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors in either the discovery or validation cohorts. Reduced PFS and overall survival were observed in patients with high ctDNA receiving anti–PD-1 monotherapy, relative to those treated with combination anti–CTLA-4/anti–PD-1 inhibitors.Conclusions:Pretreatment ctDNA is a reliable indicator of patient outcome in the first-line ICI treatment setting, but not in the second-line ICI setting, especially in patients pretreated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Preliminary evidence indicated that treatment-naïve patients with high ctDNA may preferentially benefit from combined ICIs.

Targeted therapy (BRAF inhibitor plus MEK inhibitor) is now among the possible treatment options for patients with BRAF mutation-positive stage III or stage IV melanoma. This makes prompt BRAF mutation testing an important step in the management of patients diagnosed with stage III or IV melanoma; one that can help better ensure that the optimal choice of systemic treatment is initiated with minimal delay. This article offers guidance about when and how BRAF mutation testing should be conducted when patients are diagnosed with melanoma in Australia. Notably, it recommends that pathologists reflexively order BRAF mutation testing whenever a patient is found to have American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage III or IV melanoma (i.e., any metastatic spread beyond the primary tumour) and that patient's BRAF mutation status is hitherto unknown, even if BRAF mutation testing has not been specifically requested by the treating clinician (in Australia, Medicare-subsidised BRAF

Purpose: We evaluated the predictive value of pretreatment ctDNA to inform therapeutic outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma relative to type and line of treatment. Experimental Design: Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was quantified in 125 samples collected from 110 patients prior to commencing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as first- (n = 32) or second-line (n = 27) regimens, or prior to commencing first-line BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy (n = 66). An external validation cohort included 128 patients commencing ICI therapies in the first- (N = 77) or second-line (N = 51) settings. Results: In the discovery cohort, low ctDNA (≤20 copies/mL) prior to commencing therapy predicted longer progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with first-line ICIs [HR, 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07–0.53; P < 0.0001], but not in the second-line setting. An independent cohort validated that ctDNA is predictive of PFS in the first-line setting (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22–0.83; P = 0.006), but not in the second-line ICI setting. Moreover, ctDNA prior to commencing ICI treatment was not predictive of PFS for patients pretreated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors in either the discovery or validation cohorts. Reduced PFS and overall survival were observed in patients with high ctDNA receiving anti–PD-1 monotherapy, relative to those treated with combination anti–CTLA-4/anti–PD-1 inhibitors. Conclusions: Pretreatment ctDNA is a reliable indicator of patient outcome in the first-line ICI treatment setting, but not in the second-line ICI setting, especially in patients pretreated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Preliminary evidence indicated that treatment-naïve patients with high ctDNA may preferentially benefit from combined ICIs.

Deep penetrating nevus (DPN) is a pigmented melanocytic tumor which typically displays a wedge-shaped deep penetrating architecture. Some cases show a coexisting component resembling conventional melanocytic nevus. These morphological attributes are correlated with the acquisition of genomic alterations in the Wnt pathway on a background of underlying activating MAPK pathway mutations. Lesions with features of DPN, but displaying expansile architecture, sheet-like arrangement of cells, cytological atypia, and/or more than rare mitotic activity have been described as "atypical deep penetrating nevus" or "deep penetrating melanocytoma." The molecular correlates of these atypical morphological features are not well-established. In this case report, we describe a tumor in an 8-year-old boy with histological features of atypical DPN showing somatic BRAFV600E , beta catenin , and IDH1R132C mutations. The combination of abnormalities in MAPK and Wnt pathways with IDH1 mutations seems to be a reproducible feature in a subset of atypical DPNs. Whether this "three-hit" combination is associated with a significant risk of adverse outcome remains to be established.

Molecular profiling was performed in 50 problematic ovarian sex cord-stromal tumours (SCSTs) most of which were seen in consultation. Following analysis, 17 were classified as adult granulosa cell tumour (AGCT), 16 of which showed a FOXL2 sequence variant (mutation); the initial favoured diagnosis in five of the cases was benign thecoma/fibrothecoma. Thirteen tumours ultimately classified as cellular fibroma or thecoma were FOXL2 sequence variant negative which was helpful in excluding AGCT. All six Sertoli-Leydig cell tumours (SLCTs) demonstrated DICER1 'hot spot' sequence variants, and one case each of AGCT and SLCT showed high grade histological transformation associated with a concurrent TP53 sequence variant. All eight unclassified SCSTs were negative for FOXL2 mutations and the six tested cases were DICER1 wild type; however, three tumours demonstrated MET, CTNNB1 or TP53 sequence variants. Four cases were classified as juvenile granulosa cell tumour, and one of these harboured a GNAS sequence variant. The single gynandroblastoma and microcystic stromal tumours in the series demonstrated FOXL2 and CTNNB1 alterations, respectively. In summary, molecular analysis aids in accurate classification of challenging ovarian SCSTs and sometimes leads to revision of the favoured provisional diagnosis. TP53 sequence variants may be associated with dedifferentiation in both SLCTs and AGCTs.

Increasing evidence points to the presence of low-level de novo T790M mutations in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) harboring activating EGFR mutations. We utilized digital PCR (dPCR), a highly sensitive gene mutation detection method, to detect pre-treatment T790M mutations in NSCLC tumor samples and correlated the T790M status with clinical features and patient outcomes. DNA extracted from pre-treatment NSCLC tumor tissue with known activating EGFR mutations, diagnosed between October 2010 and May 2017 at PathWest laboratory, was used to perform targeted dPCR for quantitative detection of T790M mutations. T790M was detected in 42 of 109 pre-treatment samples (38.5%). Median variant allele frequency was 0.14% (range 0.02–28.5%). Overall response rate to first generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) was 67% regardless of T790M status. The median progression free survival was 10.7 (IQR 5.6–19.9) versus 6.7 (IQR 3.5–20.8) months in T790M negative and positive patients respectively. T790M positivity correlated with increased rate of early disease progression. It also correlated with increased mortality (HR 3.1 95%CI 1.2–8.1, p = 0.022) in patients who did not respond to TKI treatment. We detected a significant rate of low-level pre-treatment T790M mutations in NSCLC using highly sensitive dPCR. Low-level pre-treatment T790M did not impact treatment response rate or overall survival, but was associated with increased rate of early progression on TKI therapy.

Plasma circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has been suggested to be a viable biomarker of response to treatment in patients with high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). TP53 mutations are present in more than 90% of HGSOCs but somatic variants are distributed across all exonic regions of the gene, requiring next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies for mutational analysis. In this study, we compared the suitability of the Accel (Swift) and Oncomine (ThermoFisher) panels for identification of TP53 mutations in ctDNA of HGSOC patients (N = 10). Only 6 patients (60%) were found to have TP53 mutations using the ACCEL panel but the addition of molecular tags in the Oncomine panel improved ctDNA detection with at least one mutation detected in all cases (100%). Orthogonal validation of the 14 somatic variants found by Oncomine, using droplet digital PCR, confirmed 79% (11/14) of the identified mutations. Overall, the Oncomine panel with unique molecular identifiers (UMI) appears more useful for ctDNA analysis in HGSOC.

IntroductionGrades 2 and 3 gliomas (G2/3 gliomas), when combined, are the second largest group of malignant brain tumours in adults. The outcomes for G2/3 gliomas at progression approach the dismal outcomes for glioblastoma (GBM), yet there is a paucity of trials for Australian patients with relapsed G2/3 gliomas compared with patients with GBM. LUMOS will be a pilot umbrella study for patients with relapsed G2/3 gliomas that aims to match patients to targeted therapies based on molecular screening with contemporaneous tumour tissue. Participants in whom no actionable or no druggable mutation is found, or in whom the matching drug is not available, will form a comparator arm and receive standard of care chemotherapy. The objective of the LUMOS trial is to assess the feasibility of this approach in a multicentre study across five sites in Australia, with a view to establishing a national molecular screening platform for patient treatment guided by the mutational analysis of contemporaneous tissue biopsiesMethods and analysisThis study will be a multicentre pilot study enrolling patients with recurrent grade 2/3 gliomas that have previously been treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy at diagnosis or at first relapse. Contemporaneous tumour tissue at the time of first relapse, defined as tissue obtained within 6 months of relapse and without subsequent intervening therapy, will be obtained from patients. Molecular screening will be performed by targeted next-generation sequencing at the reference laboratory (PathWest, Perth, Australia). RNA and DNA will be extracted from representative formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue scrolls or microdissected from sections on glass slides tissue sections following a review of the histology by pathologists. Extracted nucleic acid will be quantified by Qubit Fluorometric Quantitation (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Library preparation and targeted capture will be performed using the TruSight Tumor 170 (TST170) kit and samples sequenced on NextSeq 550 (Illumina) using NextSeq V.2.5 hi output reagents, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Data analysis will be performed using the Illumina BaseSpace TST170 app v1.02 and a custom tertiary pipeline, implemented within the Clinical Genomics Workspace software platform from PierianDx (also refer to section 3.2). Primary outcomes for the study will be the number of patients enrolled and the number of patients who complete molecular screening. Secondary outcomes will include the proportion of screened patients enrolled; proportion of patients who complete molecular screening; the turn-around time of molecular screening; and the value of a brain tumour specific multi-disciplinary tumour board, called the molecular tumour advisory panel as measured by the proportion of patients in whom the treatment recommendation was refined compared with the recommendations from the automated bioinformatics platform of the reference laboratory testing.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the lead Human Research Ethics Committee of the Sydney Local Health District: Protocol No. X19-0383. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki 2013, guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and the National Health and Medical Research Council National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007, updated 2018 and as amended periodically). Results will be disseminated using a range of media channels including newsletters, social media, scientific conferences and peer-reviewed publications.Trial registration numberACTRN12620000087954; Pre-results.

Immune checkpoint inhibition is an important therapeutic option in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression may serve as a predictive marker for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. The relationship between non-small cell lung cancer PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological characteristics remains unclear and there is no population level Australian data. We report the results of PD-L1 testing in patients with non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed at major Western Australian public hospitals served by a single state Pathology provider. We analyzed PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry in 241 non-small cell lung cancer specimens using the 22C3 clone on a Dako autostainer platform. Tumor cell PD-L1 expression was scored as Tumor Proportion Score and categorized using pre-specified subsets of 1%, 1-49% and ≥ 50% for correlation with clinicopathologic features. PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score was 1% in 65 (27%) cases, 1-49% in 100 (41%) cases and ≥ 50% in 76 (32%) cases. PD-L1-positive rate was 92% in squamous cell carcinomas and 67% in adenocarcinomas. PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score was higher in squamous cell carcinomas (p = 0.004) and lower in adenocarcinomas (p = 0.003). Of the 196 non-squamous carcinomas, 35% had rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RAS) mutations, 13% had epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, 2% had anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations and 2% had ROS1 translocations. Tumor Proportion Score ≥ 50% was seen in 34% (23/68), 28% (7/25) and 25% (1/4) of RAS, EGFR mutant, and ALK translocated carcinomas, respectively. There was no significant correlation between PD-L1 expression and molecular or genetic abnormalities, or other parameters including age, gender, stage, and smoking status. In our patient cohort, PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score was significantly higher in squamous cell carcinomas and lower in adenocarcinomas. The overall prevalence of Tumor Proportion Score ≥ 50% is consistent with that reported in clinical trials.

BACKGROUND Grade 2 and 3 (G2/3) gliomas are the second largest group of brain tumors in adults. Although the prognosis for G2/3 gliomas at the time of relapse mirror those of glioblastoma, there are few trials in this space. METHODS LUMOS was a national multi-center pilot study for patients with relapsed G2/3 gliomas designed to match contemporaneous tissue obtained at the time of disease progression with subsequent targeted therapies. The objective was to establish the feasibility of a precision oncology, umbrella approach to obtain and type tissue within a useful timeframe. As a key feature of LUMOS, a multidisciplinary Molecular Tumor Advisory Panel (MTAP) with subspecialty neuro-oncology expertise was formed to interpret the complex genomic information and provide a simplified recommendation to the treating physician. RESULTS Ten patients (median age 42: range 32-62; four G2 astrocytoma, one G3 astrocytoma, three G2 oligoendroglioma, one G3 oligodendroglioma, one mixed tumor) were enrolled in the study. Eight patients had biopsies within 6 months of study entry whilst two underwent a biopsy during the study. All patients had potentially targetable alterations (10 IDH, 3 FGFR, 2 PIK3K, CCND3, NRAS, CDK4, PRPRZ1-MET fusion and MET amplification). Matched therapies were delivered for two patients via compassionate access outside the study. The median turnaround time (TAT) of MTAP reports was 6.2 weeks (range 4.2-9.7 weeks) but 4.6 weeks when lag time for shipping was removed. CONCLUSION LUMOS confirmed that this design was feasible with good turnaround times. The MTAP facilitated education and support for treating physicians. Thes findings support moving to a larger study using contemporaneous and longitudinal tissue samples matched with targeted therapies as part of a comprehensive umbrella study design. Delivery and interpretation of molecular data is a challenge shared across oncology which may be mitigated with a neuro-oncology specific molecular tumor board.

e21570 Background: High tumor mutation burden (TMB) predicts improved efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across a range of malignancies, including melanoma. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a powerful complement to tumor biopsies for the diagnosis and clinical management of cancer patients. The TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500) clinical assay interrogates 523 cancer-related genes and has shown good concordance between tissue and ctDNA using a high throughput sequencer such as NovaSeq. There are no studies looking at concordance and utility of this assay using more affordable mid throughput platforms. Here we present a pilot study comparing TSO500 sequencing results from matched tumor and plasma specimens and concordance of selected actionable gene variants investigated by ctDNA digital PCR. Methods: Samples from 18 metastatic cutaneous melanoma patients with matched formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue and plasma collected in Streck tubes had DNA extracted for library preparation using the Illumina TSO500 NGS assay with inputs of ≥40ng of FFPE DNA and ≥10ng of ctDNA. Libraries were sequenced on a NextSeq2000 P3 flow cell to achieve recommended sequencing depth of 800 million reads per sample. A TMB cut off ≥10 mut/Mb was used as high TMB. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was performed for orthogonal validation of selected clinically significant somatic mutations. Results: Sequencing on the NextSeq2000 achieved an average of 797 million pass filter reads per sample and somatic variant allele frequency (VAF) sensitivity down to 0.12%, which exceeded vendor recommendations. There was 75% concordance on the TMB classification (low and high values, Cohen’s k = 0.714) based on tumor and plasma (r = 0.86, p < 0.01) on 8 paired samples (extended analysis will be presented). Some high TMB cases carried POLE or POLD1 variants. Actionable variants identified by ctTSO500 in 15 cases were confirmed by ddPCR, with an outstanding concordance of their VAF (R2= 0.99, p < 0.0001). Diagnosis of tier I/II actionable variants (21 variants; 81% accuracy) was achieved in 7 matched tumor tissue and blood samples. Some variants found in tumor tissue were not detected in the blood. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates the clinical utility of the TSO500 ctDNA panel using an affordable mid throughput sequencing platform to identify actionable variants and TMB from blood specimens with high sensitivity and specificity. Testing of a larger cohort of matched tumor and plasma samples will serve to evaluate the clinical utility of the TSO500 ctDNA panel as a complement or alternative strategy to tissue biopsy for the genomic profiling of melanoma patients.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may serve as a surrogate to tissue biopsy for noninvasive identification of mutations across multiple genetic loci and for disease monitoring in melanoma. In this study, we compared the mutation profiles of tumor biopsies and plasma ctDNA from metastatic melanoma patients using custom sequencing panels targeting 30 melanoma-associated genes. Somatic mutations were identified in 20 of 24 melanoma biopsies, and 16 of 20 (70%) matched-patient plasmas had detectable ctDNA. In a subgroup of seven patients for whom matching tumor tissue and plasma were sequenced, 80% of the mutations found in tumor tissue were also detected in ctDNA. However, TERT promoter mutations were only detected by ddPCR, and promoter mutations were consistently found at lower concentrations than other driver mutations in longitudinal samples. In vitro experiments revealed that mutations in promoter regions of TERT and DPH3 are underrepresented in ctDNA. While the results underscore the utility of using ctDNA as an alternative to tissue biopsy for genetic profiling and surveillance of the disease, our study highlights the underrepresentation of promoter mutations in ctDNA and its potential impact on quantitative liquid biopsy applications.

Mesenchymal neoplasms with oncogenic kinase activity due to genomic alterations in receptor tyrosine kinase genes are a morphologically heterogeneous group with a variable biologic potential. A subset of these neoplasms are characterized by immunophenotypic property of dual S100 protein/CD34 expression, histopathological resemblance to lipofibromatosis or peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and often alterations in neurotrophic tropomyosin-related kinase genes. In this article, we present a case of an S100 protein/CD34-positive spindle cell neoplasm harboring a rare BRAF gene rearrangement (KIAA1549-BRAF fusion) and discuss the clinical, histopathological, and molecular variations associated with such neoplasms.

In this study, we evaluated the predictive value of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to inform therapeutic outcomes in metastatic melanoma patients receiving systemic therapies. We analysed 142 plasma samples from metastatic melanoma patients prior to commencement of systemic therapy: 70 were treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors and 72 with immunotherapies. Patient-specific droplet digital polymerase chain reaction assays were designed for ctDNA detection. Plasma ctDNA was detected in 56% of patients prior to first-line anti-PD1 and/or anti-CTLA-4 treatment. The detection rate in the immunotherapy cohort was comparably lower than those with BRAF inhibitors (76%, p = 0.0149). Decreasing ctDNA levels within 12 weeks of treatment was strongly concordant with treatment response (Cohen&rsquo, s k = 0.798, p &lt, 0.001) and predictive of longer progression free survival. Notably, a slower kinetic of ctDNA decline was observed in patients treated with immunotherapy compared to those on BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Whole exome sequencing of ctDNA was also conducted in 9 patients commencing anti-PD-1 therapy to derive tumour mutational burden (TMB) and neoepitope load measurements. The results showed a trend of high TMB and neoepitope load in responders compared to non-responders. Overall, our data suggest that changes in ctDNA can serve as an early indicator of outcomes in metastatic melanoma patients treated with systemic therapies and therefore may serve as a tool to guide treatment decisions.

Antibodies against programmed death-1 (PD-1), and its ligand, (PD-L1) have been approved recently for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Although there are previous reports that addressed PD-L1 detection on tumour cells in SCLC, there is no comprehensive meta-analysis on the prevalence of PD-L1 expression in SCLC. We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases to assess reports on the prevalence of PD-L1 expression and the association between PD-L1 expression and overall survival (OS). This meta-analysis included 27 studies enrolling a total of 2792 patients. The pooled estimate of PD-L1 expression was 26.0% (95% CI 17.0–37.0), (22.0% after removing outlying studies). The effect size was significantly heterogeneous (I2 = 97.4, 95% CI: 95.5–98.5, p < 0.0001).Positive PD-L1 expression was a favourable prognostic factor for SCLC but not statistically significant (HR = 0.86 (95% CI (0.49–1.50), p = 0.5880; I2 = 88.7%, p < 0.0001). Begg’s funnel plots and Egger’s tests indicated no publication bias across included studies (p > 0.05). Overall, there is heterogeneity in the prevalence of PD-L1 expression in SCLC tumour cells across studies. This is significantly moderated by factors such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) evaluation cut-off values, and assessment of PD-L1 staining patterns as membranous and/or cytoplasmic. There is the need for large size, prospective and multicentre studies with well-defined protocols and endpoints to advance the clinical value of PD-L1 expression in SCLC.

Increasing evidence points to the presence of low-level de novo T790M mutations in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) harboring activating EGFR mutations. We utilized digital PCR (dPCR), a highly sensitive gene mutation detection method, to detect pre-treatment T790M mutations in NSCLC tumor samples and correlated the T790M status with clinical features and patient outcomes. DNA extracted from pre-treatment NSCLC tumor tissue with known activating EGFR mutations, diagnosed between October 2010 and May 2017 at PathWest laboratory, was used to perform targeted dPCR for quantitative detection of T790M mutations. T790M was detected in 42 of 109 pre-treatment samples (38.5%). Median variant allele frequency was 0.14% (range 0.02-28.5%). Overall response rate to first generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) was 67% regardless of T790M status. The median progression free survival was 10.7 (IQR 5.6-19.9) versus 6.7 (IQR 3.5-20.8) months in T790M negative and positive patients respectively. T790M positivity correlated with increased rate of early disease progression. It also correlated with increased mortality (HR 3.1 95%CI 1.2-8.1, p = 0.022) in patients who did not respond to TKI treatment. We detected a significant rate of low-level pre-treatment T790M mutations in NSCLC using highly sensitive dPCR. Low-level pre-treatment T790M did not impact treatment response rate or overall survival, but was associated with increased rate of early progression on TKI therapy.

The introduction of next generation sequencing (NGS) in the routine diagnostic setting is still in the development phase and has been limited by its complexity. Targeted NGS offers an attractive alternative to performing multiple single target assays and is very useful in meeting the increasing clinical demand for testing of multiple genetic aberrations in cancer specimens. To this end, we carried out a blinded validation study on 113 tumours in a diagnostic laboratory and compared mutation results from targeted NGS with those from Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, competitive allele specific TaqMan polymerase chain reaction (CAST PCR) and Cobas assays. DNA was extracted from formalin fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples that included core biopsies, resections and cytology samples from three common and one rare cancer types [non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer (CRC), malignant melanoma (MM) and gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST)]. Libraries were prepared using the TruSight Tumour 26 gene panel and NGS was carried out on the MiSeq instrument. Results from NGS were concordant with the mutational status determined by other platforms in 107 of the 113 cases tested (94.7%). The sequencing quality for NGS failed in four of the six false negative cases, while a further two samples gave false negative results because the c-KIT mutations were located outside the range of the NGS panel. One NSCLC sample contained an EGFR mutation previously detected by the Cobas assay. Reanalysis of the NGS data for this sample using a cut-off allele frequency of 1% revealed the mutation had an allele frequency of 2%, which was below the recommended software-determined threshold of 3%. NGS detected 113 additional mutations that were not previously known from analysis by the conventional methods. Twenty-six of these have known clinical importance, 37 have potential clinical significance, while 50 were novel mutations with unknown clinical significance. NGS detected variants using inputs of 10-20 ng of FFPE extracted DNA and from specimens with a tumour cell content less than 50%, for which when possible we recommend microdissection. We conclude that results from targeted NGS are highly concordant with those from other mutation testing platforms. Targeted NGS is suitable for a range of sample types received in the diagnostic pathology laboratory, including those with limited material or with low tumour cell content (TCC). This work has allowed us to determine the quality parameter settings required in order to obtain robust mutation data by NGS.

Papillary proliferations of the endometrium (PPEs) are uncommon lesions that are often associated with endometrial polyps. PPEs occasionally precede or co-exist with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or adenocarcinoma, but their pathogenesis and relationship to endometrial neoplasia is uncertain. In the present study 11 PPEs, including eight benign papillary proliferations (BPPs) and three complex papillary hyperplasias (CPHs) were examined immunohistochemically for expression of PAX2, BAF250a, p16, β-catenin and DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. Molecular analysis was also performed on the CPHs using targeted next generation sequencing (NGS). All PPEs demonstrated at least one immunohistochemical abnormality with altered expression of p16 and PAX2 in nine and seven cases, respectively, and β-catenin in one case. However, none of the cases showed loss of BAF250a or MMR protein staining. All CPHs showed KRAS mutations with additional mutations in AKT1 and FBXW7 in one case each, and both PIK3CA and CTNNB1 in the remaining case. Therefore, PPEs demonstrate immunophenotypical and molecular overlap with endometrial endometrioid neoplasia, although loss of BAF250a and MMR protein function do not appear to contribute significantly to these lesions. KRAS mutations may be important drivers in CPHs but this finding needs to be confirmed in larger studies.

The identification of somatic mutations is crucial for guiding therapeutic decisions about personalized melanoma treatment. However, genetic analysis of tumors is usually performed on limited and often low-quality DNA from tumors with low tumor cellularity and high tumor heterogeneity. Different mutation-detection platforms exist, with varying analytical sensitivities. Here we evaluated the detection of common mutations in BRAF, NRAS, and TERT promoter in 40 melanoma FFPE tissues using Droplet Digital (dd)PCR, and compared the results to the detection rates obtained by Sanger sequencing and pyrosequencing. The cellularity of tumors analyzed ranged from 5% to 50% (n = 28) and 50% to 90% (n = 12). Overall, droplet digital (dd)PCR was more sensitive, detecting mutations in 12.5% and 23% of tumors deemed as wild-type by pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing, respectively. The increased sensitivity of ddPCR was more apparent among tumors with

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is potentially predictive of clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance of reported PD-L1 IHC assays and investigate factors influencing variability. Consecutive sections from 20 non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) comprising resection, core biopsy, cytology and pleural fluid samples underwent IHC with 5 different antibody/autostainer combinations: 22C3/Link48, 28-8/BOND-MAX, E1L3N/BOND-MAX, SP142/BenchMark and SP263/BenchMark. PD-L1 RNA levels were assessed using RNAscope. The frequency of positive cases using scoring thresholds from clinical trials was 72%, 33%, 61%, 56%, and 33% for the 5 IHC protocols respectively, and 33% for RNAscope. Pairwise agreement on the classification of cases as positive or negative for PD-L1 expression ranged from 61%-94%. On a continuous scale, the lowest correlation was between 28-8/BOND-MAX and SP142/BenchMark (R2=0.25) and highest was between 22C3/Link48 and E1L3N/BOND-MAX (R2=0.71). When cases were ordered according to tumor cell (TC)%, a similar ranking of cases across IHC protocols could be observed, albeit with different quanta and limits of detection. Single-slide OPAL 7-color fluorescence IHC analysis revealed a high degree of co-localization of staining from the 5 PD-L1 antibodies. Using SP142 antibody in a BOND-MAX protocol led to increased TC% quanta, while retaining a similar ranking of samples according to TC%. The results of this study highlight tumor PD-L1 status can vary significantly according to IHC protocol. Protocol-dependent staining intensities and nominated thresholds for positivity contribute to this variability, while the antibody used appears to be less of a factor.

// Ashleigh C. McEvoy 1 , Leslie Calapre 1 , Michelle R. Pereira 1 , Tindaro Giardina 2 , Cleo Robinson 2, 3, 4 , Muhammad A. Khattak 3, 5 , Tarek M. Meniawy 3, 6 , Antonia L. Pritchard 7 , Nicholas K. Hayward 7 , Benhur Amanuel 2, 3 , Michael Millward 3, 6 , Melanie Ziman 1, 4 and Elin S. Gray 1 1 School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia 2 Anatomical Pathology, PathWest, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia 3 School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia 4 School of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia 5 Department of Medical Oncology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia 6 Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia 7 QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, Australia Correspondence to: Elin S. Gray, email: e.gray@ecu.edu.au Keywords: droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), TERT , melanoma, cancer Received: June 06, 2017 Accepted: July 25, 2017 Published: August 18, 2017 ABSTRACT Background: Currently mainly BRAF mutant circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is utilized to monitor patients with melanoma. TERT promoter mutations are common in various cancers and found in up to 70% of melanomas, including half of BRAF wild-type cases. Therefore, a sensitive method for detection of TERT promoter mutations would increase the number of patients that could be monitored through ctDNA analysis. Methods: A droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay was designed for the concurrent detection of chr5:1,295,228 C>T and chr5:1,295,250 C>T TERT promoter mutations. The assay was validated using 39 melanoma cell lines and 22 matched plasma and tumor samples. In addition, plasma samples from 56 metastatic melanoma patients and 56 healthy controls were tested for TERT promoter mutations. Results: The established ddPCR assay detected TERT promoter mutations with a lower limit of detection (LOD) of 0.17%. Total concordance was demonstrated between ddPCR and Sanger sequencing in all cell lines except one, which carried a second mutation within the probe binding-site. Concordance between matched plasma and tumor tissue was 68% (15/22), with a sensitivity of 53% (95% CI, 27%-79%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 59%-100%). A significantly longer PFS (p=0.028) was evident in ctDNA negative patients. Importantly, our TERT promoter mutations ddPCR assay allowed detection of ctDNA in 11 BRAF wild-type cases. Conclusions: The TERT promoter mutation ddPCR assay offers a sensitive test for molecular analysis of melanoma tumors and ctDNA, with the potential to be applied to other cancers.

Summary Distinction between melanocytic naevi and melanoma occasionally poses a diagnostic challenge in ambiguous cases showing overlapping histological features. Melanomas are characterised by the presence of multiple genomic copy number variants (CNVs), while this is not a feature of naevi. We assessed the feasibility and utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) to assess CNVs in melanocytic lesions. DNA was extracted from formalin fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) sections of unambiguous naevi ( n = 19) and melanomas ( n = 19). The test DNA and gender mismatched human reference DNA were differentially labelled with fluorophores. Equal quantities of the two DNA samples were mixed and co-hybridised to a SurePrint G3 Human CGH 8x60K array, and digitally scanned to capture and quantify the relative fluorescence intensities. The ratio of the fluorescence intensities was analysed by Cytogenomics software (Agilent). Frequent large CNVs were identified in 94.7% of melanoma samples, including losses of 9p (73.6%), 9q (52.6%), 10q (36.8%), 11q (36.8%), 3p (21%), and 10p (21%), and gains of 6p (42.1%), 7p (42.1%), 1q (36.8%), 8q (31.5%) and 20q (21%). Only one naevus showed two large copy number changes. Overall aCGH showed a specificity and sensitivity of 94.7% in separating naevi from melanomas. Based on our results, aCGH can be successfully used to analyse CNVs of melanocytic lesions utilising FFPE derived biopsy samples, providing a potentially useful adjunctive test for the classification of diagnostically challenging melanocytic proliferations.

Background PD‐1 inhibitors are routinely used for the treatment of advanced melanoma. This study sought to determine whether PD‐L1 expression on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can serve as a predictive biomarker of clinical benefit and response to treatment with the PD‐1 inhibitor pembrolizumab. Methods Blood samples were collected from patients with metastatic melanoma receiving pembrolizumab, prior to treatment and 6–12 weeks after initiation of therapy. Multiparametric flow cytometry was used to identify CTCs and evaluate the expression of PD‐L1. Results CTCs were detected in 25 of 40 patients (63%). Patients with detectable PD‐L1+ CTCs (14/25, 64%) had significantly longer progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with patients with PD‐L1− CTCs (26.6 months vs. 5.5 months; p = .018). The 12‐month PFS rates were 76% versus 22% in the PD‐L1+ versus PD‐L1− CTCs groups (p = .012), respectively. A multivariate linear regression analysis confirmed that PD‐L1+ CTC is an independent predictive biomarker of PFS (hazard ratio, 0.229; 95% confidence interval, 0.052–1.012; p = .026). Conclusion Our results reveal the potential of CTCs as a noninvasive real‐time biopsy to evaluate PD‐L1 expression in patients with melanoma. PD‐L1 expression on CTCs may be predictive of response to pembrolizumab and longer PFS. Implications for Practice The present data suggest that PD‐L1 expression on circulating tumor cells may predict response to pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma. This needs further validation in a larger trial and, if proven, might be a useful liquid biopsy tool that could be used to stratify patients into groups more likely to respond to immunotherapy, hence leading to health cost savings., The objective of this study was to determine whether PD‐L1 expression on circulating tumor cells can serve as a predictive biomarker of clinical benefit and response to treatment with the PD‐1 inhibitor pembrolizumab.

Immunotherapy is an important and established treatment option for patients with advanced melanoma. Initial anti-PD1 trials arbitrarily defined a two-year treatment duration, but a shorter treatment duration may be appropriate. In this study, we retrospectively assessed 70 patients who stopped anti-PD1 therapy in the absence of progressive disease (PD) to determine clinical outcomes. In our cohort, the median time on treatment was 11.8 months. Complete response was attained at time of anti-PD1 discontinuation in 61 (87%). After a median follow up of 34.2 months (range: 2&ndash, 70.8) post discontinuation, 81% remained disease free. Using ddPCR, we determine the utility of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to predict progressive disease after cessation (n = 38). There was a significant association between presence of ctDNA at cessation and disease progression (p = 0.012, Fisher&rsquo, s exact test) and this conferred a negative and positive predictive value of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.645&ndash, 0.930) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.284&ndash, 0.995), respectively. Additionally, dichotomised treatment-free survival in patients with or without ctDNA at cessation was significantly longer in the latter group (p &lt, 0.001, HR: 0.008, 95% CI: 0.001&ndash, 0.079). Overall, our study confirms that durable disease control can be achieved with cessation of therapy in the absence of disease progression and undetectable ctDNA at cessation was associated with longer treatment-free survival.

Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in primary melanoma have been found to correlate with patient outcomes. A subpopulation of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes expresses the transcription factor forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3). These are known as FOXP3+ T-regulatory cells (Tregs) and are thought to play an immune suppressive role in tumourigenesis. In most tumours, including melanoma, a high density of intratumoural FOXP3+ Tregs has been associated with poor prognosis. It is not known whether these cells also influence the response to BRAF inhibition therapy in metastatic melanoma. In the present study we retrospectively investigated the density of FOXP3+ Tregs in primary melanomas, with known subsequent metastasis, in relation to various clinicopathological parameters including BRAF and NRAS mutation status, and response to BRAF inhibitor therapy. The intratumoural density of FOXP3+ Tregs was two-fold higher in melanomas with mutant BRAF compared to those with wild type BRAF status (p = 0.03). In patients treated with BRAF kinase inhibitors FOXP3+ Treg density in the primary tumour was not predictive of treatment response (p = 0.38).

Hairy cell leukaemia (HCL) is a rare, indolent chronic B-cell leukaemia accounting for approximately 2% of all adult leukaemias. The recent association of the BRAF p.Val600Glu (V600E) mutation in HCL makes it a valuable molecular diagnostic marker. We compared the ability of Sanger sequencing, fluorescent single-strand conformational polymorphism (F-SSCP) and high resolution melting (HRM) analysis to detect BRAF mutations in 20 cases of HCL consisting of four archival Romanowsky stained air-dried peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate smears, 12 mercury fixed decalcified bone marrow trephine biopsies, three formalin fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) splenectomy samples and one fresh peripheral blood sample. DNA was amplified and BRAF mutation status determined by the three methods above. V600E mutation was identified in 94%, 89% and 72% of HCL cases by F-SSCP, HRM and Sanger sequencing, respectively. In one case, in addition to the p.Val600Glu mutation, a p.Lys601Thr (K601T) mutation was identified. DNA from archival slide scrapings, mercury-fixed and FFPE tissue can be used to identify BRAF mutations with high sensitivity, especially using HRM/F-SSCP. The V600E mutation can be used as a supplementary molecular marker to aid in the diagnosis of HCL and the presence of the mutation may provide a target for therapy.

Aims Accurate assessment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement in non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) is critical to identify patients who are likely to respond to crizotinib. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ALK/EML4 TriCheck FISH probe in a series of NSCLCs enriched for tumours with equivocal ALK status. Methods and results ALK FISH was prospectively performed on 45 NSCLCs with the ALK/EML4 TriCheck probe (ZytoVision) and the Vysis ALK break-apart probe (Abbott Molecular). ALK immunohistochemistry was performed with 5A4 and D5F3 antibodies. Fourteen cases had equivocal ALK status, based on borderline or focal FISH positivity, an atypical FISH pattern, or discrepancy between ALK FISH and immunohistochemistry. Four of the 14 equivocal cases showed discordance between the two FISH probes. All other cases were concordant. The TriCheck probe showed that, of 31 unequivocal cases, 15 were ALK-rearranged, and 60% of these had EML4 as the translocation partner. Within the group of 14 equivocal cases, 12 showed rearrangement with the Tricheck probe; only one of these showed EML4 rearrangement. Of the six equivocal cases that received crizotinib, four showed clinical benefit. Conclusions The ALK/EML4 TriCheck FISH probe may be useful for the detection of ALK rearrangements, especially in borderline or atypical cases, where an additional unique ALK FISH probe may provide further confirmation of rearrangement.

The identification of somatic mutations is crucial for guiding therapeutic decisions about personalized melanoma treatment. However, genetic analysis of tumors is usually performed on limited and often low-quality DNA from tumors with low tumor cellularity and high tumor heterogeneity. Different mutation-detection platforms exist, with varying analytical sensitivities. Here we evaluated the detection of common mutations in BRAF, NRAS, and TERT promoter in 40 melanoma FFPE tissues using Droplet Digital (dd)PCR, and compared the results to the detection rates obtained by Sanger sequencing and pyrosequencing. The cellularity of tumors analyzed ranged from 5% to 50% (n = 28) and 50% to 90% (n = 12). Overall, droplet digital (dd)PCR was more sensitive, detecting mutations in 12.5% and 23% of tumors deemed as wild-type by pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing, respectively. The increased sensitivity of ddPCR was more apparent among tumors with50% tumor cellularity. Implementation of ddPCR-based assays may facilitate analysis of early-stage tumors and support research into improving outcomes in melanoma patients.

Background Currently mainly BRAF mutant circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is utilized to monitor patients with melanoma. TERT promoter mutations are common in various cancers and found in up to 70% of melanomas, including half of BRAF wild-type cases. Therefore, a sensitive method for detection of TERT promoter mutations would increase the number of patients that could be monitored through ctDNA analysis. Methods A droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay was designed for the concurrent detection of chr5:1,295,228 C>T and chr5:1,295,250 C>T TERT promoter mutations. The assay was validated using 39 melanoma cell lines and 22 matched plasma and tumor samples. In addition, plasma samples from 56 metastatic melanoma patients and 56 healthy controls were tested for TERT promoter mutations. Results The established ddPCR assay detected TERT promoter mutations with a lower limit of detection (LOD) of 0.17%. Total concordance was demonstrated between ddPCR and Sanger sequencing in all cell lines except one, which carried a second mutation within the probe binding-site. Concordance between matched plasma and tumor tissue was 68% (15/22), with a sensitivity of 53% (95% CI, 27%-79%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 59%-100%). A significantly longer PFS (p=0.028) was evident in ctDNA negative patients. Importantly, our TERT promoter mutations ddPCR assay allowed detection of ctDNA in 11 BRAF wild-type cases. Conclusions The TERT promoter mutation ddPCR assay offers a sensitive test for molecular analysis of melanoma tumors and ctDNA, with the potential to be applied to other cancers.

Benign or malignant mural nodules rarely occur in mucinous tumors (MTs) of the ovary and malignant nodules can show mesenchymal or epithelial differentiation. The histogenesis of mural nodules is unclear and it has been suggested that these may evolve through divergent differentiation of the mucinous neoplasm or alternatively represent a collision phenomenon. To test these possibilities we compared the molecular profile of 7 ovarian MTs with their matched mural carcinomatous nodules (MCNs) by next-generation sequencing. We found identical KRAS mutations in paired MTs and MCNs in 6 cases, one of which also showed identical CDH1 mutations in both components. In 1 tumor a KRAS mutation was detected in the mucinous neoplasm but not in the MCN; however, identical p53 mutations were present in both tumor elements. Unpaired p53 and PTEN mutations were detected only in the MCN in 2 cases, while mutations in p53 and PIK3CA genes were observed only in the MT in 2 cases. The overall comparative genomic profile was consistent with the neoplastic nature of the MCNs and strongly supported their clonal relationship with the more differentiated mucinous neoplasms. MCNs possibly develop through the acquisition of additional genomic alterations, such as p53 and PTEN mutations, resulting in an anaplastic morphologic phenotype. Our findings also suggest that ovarian MTs with MCNs often arise in KRAS mutant neoplasms. However, mutations in other genes such as PIK3CA and CDH1 may play a role in the neoplastic evolution of a subset of these tumors.