Search

OBJECTIVES: The UK Biobank (UKBB) and German National Cohort (NAKO) are among the largest cohort studies, capturing a wide range of health-related data from the general population, including comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate how MRI data from these large-scale studies can be jointly analyzed and to derive comprehensive quantitative image-based phenotypes across the general adult population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Image-derived features of abdominal organs (volumes of liver, spleen, kidneys, and pancreas; volumes of kidney hilum adipose tissue; and fat fractions of liver and pancreas) were extracted from T1-weighted Dixon MRI data of 17,996 participants of UKBB and NAKO based on quality-controlled deep learning generated organ segmentations. To enable valid cross-study analysis, we first analyzed the data generating process using methods of causal discovery. We subsequently harmonized data from UKBB and NAKO using the ComBat approach for batch effect correction. We finally performed quantile regression on harmonized data across studies providing quantitative models for the variation of image-derived features stratified for sex and dependent on age, height, and weight. RESULTS: Data from 8791 UKBB participants (49.9% female; age, 63 ± 7.5 years) and 9205 NAKO participants (49.1% female, age: 51.8 ± 11.4 years) were analyzed. Analysis of the data generating process revealed direct effects of age, sex, height, weight, and the data source (UKBB vs NAKO) on image-derived features. Correction of data source-related effects resulted in markedly improved alignment of image-derived features between UKBB and NAKO. Cross-study analysis on harmonized data revealed comprehensive quantitative models for the phenotypic variation of abdominal organs across the general adult population. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-study analysis of MRI data from UKBB and NAKO as proposed in this work can be helpful for future joint data analyses across cohorts linking genetic, environmental, and behavioral risk factors to MRI-derived phenotypes and provide reference values for clinical diagnostics.

In the setting of ongoing SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, vaccine-related tracer uptake in locoregional lymph nodes has become a well-known issue in tumor staging by

The aim of this study was to compare PET/MR enterography with ileocolonoscopy regarding patients' acceptance and their future preference.Between October 2014 and February 2018 one-hundred-eleven patients underwent PET/MR enterography and ileocolonoscopy within 2 weeks. Overall acceptance of each modality was rated using a 10-point Likert scale with higher score indicating worse experience. Wilcoxon test was used to assess difference. Patients' acceptance of bowel cleansing and oral intake of contrast agent was analyzed in the same way. Furthermore, to find out if diagnosis, gender and age might influence patients' acceptance and future preference, Mann-Whitney U test for ordinal and Chi-squared test for categorical parameters were applied.77 patients (47 females) with a mean age of 44.5 years and diagnosed ulcerative colitis (UC; n = 46) and Crohn's disease (CD; n = 31), were included in the analysis. Overall, ileocolonoscopy was significantly better rated than PET/MR enterography (p 0.001). Bowel cleansing was worse tolerated than oral intake of liquid (p 0.001). Patients with CD preferred PET/MR enterography as future screening method, while UC patients favored ileocolonoscopy (p = 0.012). PET/MR enterography tended to be better accepted by CD patients (p = 0.08). Females tolerated both bowel cleansing and oral contrast agent worse than males (p = 0.05 and 0.047). No significant difference between different age groups was found.Ileocolonoscopy was rated as better tolerable than PET/MR and the overall rate for future preference was very similar. Optimization of both modalities might enhance patients' acceptance.

Objectives To evaluate and compare the diagnostic potential of whole-body MRI and whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI for N and M staging in newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer. Material and methods A total of 104 patients (age 53.4 ± 12.5) with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer were enrolled in this study prospectively. All patients underwent a whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI. MRI and 18F-FDG PET/MRI datasets were evaluated separately regarding lesion count, lesion localization, and lesion characterization (malignant/benign) as well as the diagnostic confidence (5-point ordinal scale, 1–5). The N and M stages were assessed according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual in MRI datasets alone and in 18F-FDG PET/MRI datasets, respectively. In the majority of lesions histopathology served as the reference standard. The remaining lesions were followed-up by imaging and clinical examination. Separately for nodal-positive and nodal-negative women, a McNemar chi2 test was performed to compare sensitivity and specificity of the N and M stages between 18F-FDG PET/MRI and MRI. Differences in diagnostic confidence scores were assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results MRI determined the N stage correctly in 78 of 104 (75%) patients with a sensitivity of 62.3% (95% CI: 0.48–0.75), a specificity of 88.2% (95% CI: 0.76–0.96), a PPV (positive predictive value) of 84.6% % (95% CI: 69.5–0.94), and a NPV (negative predictive value) of 69.2% (95% CI: 0.57–0.8). Corresponding results for 18F-FDG PET/MRI were 87/104 (83.7%), 75.5% (95% CI: 0.62–0.86), 92.2% (0.81–0.98), 90% (0.78–0.97), and 78.3% (0.66–0.88), showing a significantly better sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/MRI determining malignant lymph nodes (p = 0.008). The M stage was identified correctly in MRI and 18F-FDG PET/MRI in 100 of 104 patients (96.2%). Both modalities correctly staged all 7 patients with distant metastases, leading to false-positive findings in 4 patients in each modality (3.8%). In a lesion-based analysis, 18F-FDG PET/MRI showed a significantly better performance in correctly determining malignant lesions (85.8% vs. 67.1%, difference 18.7% (95% CI: 0.13–0.26), p p Conclusion 18F-FDG PET/MRI has a better diagnostic accuracy for N staging in primary breast cancer patients and provides a significantly higher diagnostic confidence in lesion characterization than MRI alone. But both modalities bear the risk to overestimate the M stage.

Purpose In uveal melanoma patients, liver metastases can be treated by hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). During this procedure, melphalan or, less frequently, fotemustine is infused into the hepatic artery or the hepatic lobe arteries in regularly repeated interventions to achieve local tumor control. The aim of this study was to investigate the radiation exposure of HAIC. Material and methods In this retrospective study, dose data from 841 procedures in 140 patients (mean age 65.3 ± 9.9 years, 74 female) who underwent HAIC between 06/2017 and 10/2021 at one of three different angiography systems were analyzed. Results In the overall population, dose area product (DAP) (median (IQR)) was 1773 cGy·cm2 (884–3688). DAP was significantly higher in the first intervention, where a complete diagnostic workup of the vasculature was performed, than in follow-up interventions: 5765 cGy·cm2 (3160–8804) versus 1502 cGy·cm2 (807–2712) (p 2 (633–2717), two positions 1985 cGy·cm2 (1118–4074), three positions 6407 cGy·cm2 (2616–11590) (p Conclusion In uveal melanoma patients with liver metastases undergoing HAIC, radiation exposure is significantly higher both at the first intervention compared to follow-up interventions, but also with increasing number of infusion positions. Level of evidence: 3

To evaluate the impact of different metal artifact reduction algorithms on Hounsfield units (HU) and the standardized uptake value (SUV) in normal organs in patients with different metal implants.This study prospectively included 66 patients (mean age of 66.02 ± 13.1 years) with 87 different metal implants. CT image reconstructions were performed using weighted filtered back projection (WFBP) as the standard method, metal artifact reduction in image space (MARIS), and an iterative metal artifacts reduction (iMAR) algorithm for large implants. These datasets were used for PET attenuation correction. HU and SUV measurements were performed in nine predefined anatomical locations: liver, lower lung lobes, descending aorta, thoracic vertebral body, autochthonous back muscles, pectoral muscles, and internal jugular vein. Differences between HU and SUV measurements were compared using pairedNo significant differences were observed between reconstructed images using iMAR and WFBP concerning HU and SUV measurements in liver (HU:Metal artifact reduction algorithms such as iMAR do not alter the data information of normal organs not affected by artifacts.

Objective: To assess accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to differentiate uric acid from calcium urinary stones in dual-energy split filter vs sequential-spiral vs dual-source acquisition. Methods: Thirty-four urinary stones (volume 89.0 ± 77.4 mm³; 17 calcium stones, 17 uric acid stones) were scanned in a water-filled phantom using a split-filter equipped CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition Edge, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) in split-filter mode at 120 kVp and sequential-spiral mode at 80 and 140 kVp. Additional DE scans were acquired at 80 and 140 kVp (tin filter) with a dual-source CT scanner (SOMATOM Definition FLASH, Siemens Healthineers). Scans were performed with a CTDIvol of 7.3 mGy in all protocols. Urinary stone categorization was based on dual energy ratio (DER) using an automated 3D segmentation. As reference standard, infrared spectroscopy was used to determine urinary stone composition. Results: All three DECT techniques significantly differentiated between uric acid and calcium stones by attenuation values and DERs (p < 0.001 for all). Split-filter DECT provided higher DERs for uric acid stones, when compared with dual-source and sequential-spiral DECT, and lower DERs for calcified stones when compared with dual-source DECT (p < 0.001 for both), leading to a decreased accuracy for material differentiation. Conclusion: Split-filter DECT, sequential-spiral DECT and dual-source DECT all allow for the acquisition of DER to classify urinary stones. Advances in knowledge: Split-filter DECT enables the differentiation between uric acid and calcium stones despite decreased spectral separation when compared with dual-source and dual-spiral DECT.

Simple Summary In this study, we assessed the potential of simultaneously acquired 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) and magnetic resonance imaging-derived quantitative imaging parameters to predict the tumor grade, metastatic status, and response to neoadjuvant therapy of primary soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Based on the results of the present study, quantifications of the 18F-FDG PET uptake provide useful prognostic data for the evaluation of histopathological response to neoadjuvant treatment as well as the aggressiveness of high-risk sarcomas, whereas no correlation between the different outcome variables and the results for tumor size and diffusion-weighted imaging-derived apparent diffusion coefficient values was found. Accordingly, measurements of the metabolic activity of primary and untreated soft-tissue sarcomas could non-invasively deliver relevant information, that may be used for treatment planning and risk-stratification of sarcoma patients in a pretherapeutic setting. Abstract Background: To evaluate the potential of simultaneously acquired 18F-FDG PET- and MR-derived quantitative imaging data sets of primary soft-tissue sarcomas for the prediction of neoadjuvant treatment response, the metastatic status and tumor grade. Methods: A total of 52 patients with a high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma underwent a 18F-FDG PET/MR examination within one week before the start of neoadjuvant treatment. For each patient, the maximum tumor size, metabolic activity (SUVs), and diffusion-restriction (ADC values) of the tumor manifestations were determined. A Mann–Whitney-U test was used, and ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the potential to predict histopathological treatment response, the metastatic status or tumor grade. The results from the histopathological analysis served as reference standard. Results: Soft-tissue sarcomas with a histopathological treatment response revealed a significantly higher metabolic activity than tumors in the non-responder group. In addition, grade 3 tumors showed a significant higher 18F-FDG uptake than grade 2 tumors. Furthermore, no significant correlation between the different outcome variables and tumor size or calculated ADC-values could be identified. Conclusion: Measurements of the metabolic activity of primary and untreated soft-tissue sarcomas could non-invasively deliver relevant information that may be used for treatment planning and risk-stratification of high-risk sarcoma patients in a pretherapeutic setting.

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of PET-MR enterography in detecting histological active inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis and the impact of bowel purgation on diagnostic accuracies of PET-MR parameters. Fifty patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov [NCT03781284]). Forty patients were randomized in two study arms, in which bowel purgation was performed either before or after PET-MR enterography. All patients underwent ileocolonoscopy with mucosal biopsies after PET-MR within 24 h. Diagnostic performance of MR morphological parameters (MRmorph), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and PET in detecting histological inflammation determined by the Nancy index was compared with each other and between study arms. Correlation between PET and histological inflammatory severity was calculated. In study arm without previous bowel purgation, SUVmax ratio of bowel segment (relative to SUVmax of the liver) facilitated the highest specificity and diagnostic accuracy compared with MRmorph and DWI. Bowel cleansing led to markedly increased metabolic activity of bowel segments, resulting in significantly reduced specificity of PET compared with study arm without purgation (0.808 vs. 0.966, p = 0.007, respectively). Inter-observer concordance for assessing MRmorph was clearly increased after bowel cleansing (Cohen’s κ, 0.847 vs. 0.665; p = 0.013, respectively), though diagnostic performance of MRmorph was not significantly improved. Our findings suggested that the change of metabolic status was mainly associated with the grade of neutrophil infiltrate and less dependent on chronic infiltrate. PET-MR enterography was an excellent non-invasive diagnostic method in the assessment of histological active inflammation in ulcerative colitis without the need of previous bowel purgation. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03781284

Our purpose was to assess the diagnostic potential of simultaneously acquired 18F-FDG PET and MRI data sets for therapy response assessment of isolated limb perfusion (ILP) in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). Methods: In total, 45 patients with histopathologically verified STS were prospectively enrolled for an integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI examination before and after ILP. Therapy response was assessed based on different MRI- and PET-derived morphologic (RECIST and the MR-adapted Choi criteria) and metabolic (PERCIST) criteria. In addition, a regression model was used combining relative changes in quantitative variables to predict treatment response under ILP. Histopathologic results after subsequent tumor resection served as the reference standard, and patients were categorized as responders or nonresponders on the basis of the 6-stage regression scale by Salzer-Kuntschik. Results: Histopathologic analysis categorized 27 patients as responders (grades I-III) and 18 patients as nonresponders (grades IV-VI). Calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy were 22%, 89%, 75%, 43%, and 49% for RECIST; 70%, 44%, 66%, 50%, and 60% for the Choi criteria; and 85%, 78%, 85%, 78%, and 82% for PERCIST. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.56 for RECIST, 0.57 for the Choi criteria, and 0.82 for PERCIST. The combined regression model revealed higher values (AUC, 0.90) than for the stand-alone analysis, however, differences to metabolic parameters did not reach significance (P value: 0.067). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the superiority of 18F-FDG PET over MRI data sets for response assessment of STS under neoadjuvant ILP. In a clinical setting, MRI delivers valuable information for presurgical assessment. Therefore, combining 18F-FDG PET and MRI data may enable more reliable treatment planning and therapy monitoring of STS.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most prevalent cancer and the third most frequent cause of cancer-related death. A growing number of local and systemic therapies are available, and accurate staging is critical for management decisions. We assessed the impact of neovasculature imaging by (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on disease staging, prognostic groups, and management of patients with HCC compared with staging with CT. Methods: Forty patients who received imaging with (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for HCC staging between September 2018 and September 2019 were retrospectively included. Management before and after PET scanning was assessed by standardized surveys. The presence of HCC was evaluated by 3 masked readers on a per-patient and per-region basis for PET/CT (PET criteria) and multiphase contrast-enhanced CT (CT criteria) in separate sessions. Lesions were validated by follow-up imaging or histopathology, and progression-free survival was recorded. Endpoints were detection rate and positive predictive value for (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET versus CT, interreader reproducibility, and changes in stage, prognostic groups, and management plans. Results: Median age was 65 y (range, 37–81 y), and median Child–Pugh score was 5 (range, 5–9). Most patients were treatment-naïve (27/40, 67.5%). The sensitivity of PET versus CT to identify liver lesions for patients with lesion validation was 31 of 32 (97%) for both modalities, whereas it was 6 of 6 (100%) versus 4 of 6 (67%), respectively, for extrahepatic lesions. PET and CT each had a positive predictive value of 100% at the liver level. PET versus CT stage was congruent in 30 of 40 (75%) patients; upstaging was seen in 8 of 40 patients (20%), whereas 2 of 40 (5%) had downstaging by PET. Intended management changed in 19 of 40 patients (47.5%); 9 of 19 of these patients were found to have detectable distant metastases (47.4%) and assigned stage 4 disease, most of whom were shifted to systemic therapy (8/9, 89%). Two patients underwent (177)Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy. Median progression-free survival was 5.2 mo for the entire cohort; 5.3 mo for PET M0, and 4.7 mo for PET M1 patients, respectively. Conclusion: (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET demonstrated higher accuracy than CT in the detection of HCC metastases and was associated with a management change in about half the patient cohort.

Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of fecal biomarkers and 18F-fludeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emmision tomography-MR (PET-MR) in the assessment of disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis. Methods: This study was conducted under the framework of a single-center clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov [NCT03781284]). N = 50 participants were enrolled. Fecal samples were collected before bowel preparation. All patients underwent whole-body 18F-FDG PET-MR followed by ileocolonoscopy within 24 h. Diagnostic performance of five fecal biomarkers (calprotectin, lactoferrin, polymorphonuclear leukocyte elastase, S100A12 and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin), MR morphological parameters (MRmorph), diffusion-weighted imaging and PET in detecting active disease determined by Rachmilewitz endoscopic activity index (EAI) were evaluated and compared with each other. Correlations between fecal biomarkers, PET and endoscopy were calculated. Results: According to EAI, n = 38 patients presented with endoscopically active disease (16 mild, 19 moderate and 3 severe). All five biomarkers, PET and MRmorph could differentiate endoscopically active disease from endoscopic remission without significant difference regarding their operating characteristics (accuracies between 0.673 for calprotectin and 0.898 for lactoferrin). In predicting endoscopically moderate to severe disease, PET showed the highest diagnostic performance (accuracy = 0.857) compared to calprotectin and lactoferrin (accuracy = 0.633 and 0.735). PET had also the strongest correlation with endoscopy (ρ = 0.685, p < 0.001), while within fecal biomarkers the levels of lactoferrin and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin correlated significantly with EAI (ρ = 0.423 and 0.528, both p < 0.05). Conclusion: Both fecal biomarkers and PET-MR were excellent non-invasive diagnostic tools in the assessment of disease activity in ulcerative colitis. Advances in knowledge: Both fecal biomarkers and PET-MR parameters are able to predict endoscopically active disease with comparable diagnostic performance. PET had the highest correlation with endoscopy and outperformed fecal biomarkers in differentiating moderate to severe from mild disease.

Our purpose was to evaluate and compare the clinical utility of simultaneously obtained quantitative

AIMS Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are known to overexpress somatostatin receptors (SSTR), which can be visualized by DOTATOC-PET. Reduced SSTR expression on the other hand may indicate dedifferentiation. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess, if conventional PET parameters and textural features (TF) derived from simultaneous PET and MRI including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) are associated with the proliferative activity of NETs, potentially allowing non-invasive tumor grading. METHODS Our institutional database was screened for patients with NET and liver metastases >1 cm. We assessed conventional PET parameters, such as maximum and mean standardized uptake value and more elaborate TF parameters from PET and ADC-MRI (including entropy and homogeneity) from up to the five largest liver lesions per patient. The association of proliferative activity as measured by Ki67-/MIB1-index with the aforementioned parameters was analyzed. RESULTS One hundred patients with NET/NECs were eligible with a Ki67-index ranging from

Our purpose was to investigate differences between PET/MRI and PET/CT in lesion detection and classification in oncologic whole-body examinations and to investigate radiation exposure differences between the 2 modalities. Methods: In this observational single-center study, 1,003 oncologic examinations (918 patients; mean age, 57.8 ± 14.4 y) were included. Patients underwent PET/CT and subsequent PET/MRI (149.8 ± 49.7 min after tracer administration). Examinations were reviewed by radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians in consensus. Additional findings, characterization of indeterminate findings on PET/CT, and missed findings on PET/MRI, including their clinical relevance and effective dose of both modalities, were investigated. The McNemar test was used to compare lesion detection between the 2 hybrid imaging modalities (P < 0.001, indicating statistical significance). Results: Additional information on PET/MRI was reported for 26.3% (264/1,003) of examinations, compared with PET/CT (P < 0.001). Of these, additional malignant findings were detected in 5.3% (53/1,003), leading to a change in TNM staging in 2.9% (29/1,003) due to PET/MRI. Definite lesion classification of indeterminate PET/CT findings was possible in 11.1% (111/1,003) with PET/MRI. In 2.9% (29/1,003), lesions detected on PET/CT were not visible on PET/MRI. Malignant lesions were missed in 1.2% (12/1,003) on PET/MRI, leading to a change in TNM staging in 0.5% (5/1,003). The estimated mean effective dose for whole-body PET/CT amounted to 17.6 ± 8.7 mSv, in comparison to 3.6 ± 1.4 mSv for PET/MRI, resulting in a potential dose reduction of 79.6% (P < 0.001). Conclusion: PET/MRI facilitates staging comparable to that of PET/CT and improves lesion detectability in selected cancers, potentially helping to promote fast, efficient local and whole-body staging in 1 step, when additional MRI is recommended. Furthermore, younger patients may benefit from the reduced radiation exposure of PET/MRI.

Objectives To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced thoraco-abdominal computed tomography and whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI in N and M staging in newly diagnosed, histopathological proven breast cancer. Material and methods A total of 80 consecutive women with newly diagnosed and histopathologically confirmed breast cancer were enrolled in this prospective study. Following inclusion criteria had to be fulfilled: (1) newly diagnosed, treatment-naive T2-tumor or higher T-stage or (2) newly diagnosed, treatment-naive triple-negative tumor of every size or (3) newly diagnosed, treatment-naive tumor with molecular high risk (T1c, Ki67 >14%, HER2neu over-expression, G3). All patients underwent a thoraco-abdominal ceCT and a whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI. All datasets were evaluated by two experienced radiologists in hybrid imaging regarding suspect lesion count, localization, categorization and diagnostic confidence. Images were interpreted in random order with a reading gap of at least 4 weeks to avoid recognition bias. Histopathological results as well as follow-up imaging served as reference standard. Differences in staging accuracy were assessed using Mc Nemars chi2 test. Results CT rated the N stage correctly in 64 of 80 (80%, 95% CI:70.0–87.3) patients with a sensitivity of 61.5% (CI:45.9–75.1), a specificity of 97.6% (CI:87.4–99.6), a PPV of 96% (CI:80.5–99.3), and a NPV of 72.7% (CI:59.8–82.7). Compared to this, 18F-FDG PET/MRI determined the N stage correctly in 71 of 80 (88.75%, CI:80.0–94.0) patients with a sensitivity of 82.1% (CI:67.3–91.0), a specificity of 95.1% (CI:83.9–98.7), a PPV of 94.1% (CI:80.9–98.4) and a NPV of 84.8% (CI:71.8–92.4). Differences in sensitivities were statistically significant (difference 20.6%, CI:-0.02–40.9; p = 0.008). Distant metastases were present in 7/80 patients (8.75%). 18 F-FDG PET/MRI detected all of the histopathological proven metastases without any false-positive findings, while 3 patients with bone metastases were missed in CT (sensitivity 57.1%, specificity 95.9%). Additionally, CT presented false-positive findings in 3 patients. Conclusion 18F-FDG PET/MRI has a high diagnostic potential and outperforms CT in assessing the N and M stage in patients with primary breast cancer.

Objectives To investigate the influence of contrast agent administration on attenuation correction (AC) based on a CAIPIRINHA (CAIPI)-accelerated T1-weighted Dixon 3D-VIBE sequence in 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI. Material and methods Fifty-one patients with neuroendocrine tumors underwent whole-body 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI for tumor staging. Two PET reconstructions were performed using AC-maps that were created using a high-resolution CAIPI-accelerated Dixon-VIBE sequence with an additional bone atlas and truncation correction using the HUGE (B0 homogenization using gradient enhancement) method before and after application of Gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agent. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) of 21 volumes of interest (VOIs) were compared between in both PET data sets per patient. A student’s t-test for paired samples was performed to test for potential differences between both AC-maps and both reconstructed PET data sets. Bonferroni correction was performed to prevent α-error accumulation, p Results Significant quantitative differences between SUVmax were found in the perirenal fat (19.65 ± 48.03 %, p Conclusion The administration of (Gd)-contrast agents in this study has shown a considerable influence on the AC-maps in PET/MRI and, consequently impacted quantification in the reconstructed PET data. Therefore, dedicated PET/MRI staging protocols have to be adjusted so that AC-map acquisition is performed prior to contrast agent administration.

OBJECTIVES To investigate if the combined analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardized uptake values (SUV) measured in 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MRI) examinations correlates with overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 92 patients with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven NSCLC (44 women and 48 men, mean age 63.1 ± 9.9y) underwent a dedicated thoracic 18F-FDG PET/MRI examination. A manually drawn polygonal region of interest (ROI), encompassing the entire primary tumor mass, was placed over the primary tumor on fused PET/MR images to determine the maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax; SUVmean) as well as on the ADC maps to quantify the mean and minimum ADC values (ADCmean, ADCmin). The impact of these parameters to predict patient's overall survival was tested using hazard ratios (HR). Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to assess dependencies between the different values. A p-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS In all 92 patients (n = 59 dead at time of retrospective data collection, mean time till death: 19 ± 16 month, n = 33 alive, mean time to last follow-up: 56 ± 22 month) the Hazard ratios (HR) as independent predictors for overall survival (OS) of SUVmax were 2.37 (95 % CI: 1.23-4.59, p = 0.008) and for SUVmean 1.85 (95 % CI: 1.05-3.26, p = 0.03) while ADCmin showed a HR of 0.95 (95 % CI: 0.57-1.59, p = 0.842) and ADCmean a HR of 2.01 (95 % CI: 1.2-3.38, p = 0.007). Furthermore, a combined analysis for SUVmax/ADCmean, SUVmax / ADCmin and SUVmean/ADCmean revealed a HR of 2.01 (95 % CI: 1.10-3.67, p = 0.02), 1.75 (95 % CI: 0.97-3.15, p = 0.058) and 1.78 (95 % CI: 1.02-3.10, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION SUVmax and SUVmean of the primary tumor are predictors for OS in therapy-naive NSCLC patients, whereas the combined analysis of SUV and ADC values does not improve these results. Therefore, ADC values do not further enhance the diagnostic value of SUV as a prognostic biomarker in NSCLC.

Purpose To investigate whether potential differences in staging between a traditional staging imaging algorithm and 18F-FDG PET/MR lead to a change in patient management in breast carcinoma and to compare the diagnostic accuracy between the traditional staging algorithm and 18F-FDG PET/MR for the TNM classification. Method In this prospective cohort study from two university hospitals 56 women with newly diagnosed, therapy-naive breast cancer and increased pre-test probability for distant metastases were included. All patients were examined by a traditional staging imaging algorithm (X-ray mammography, breast ultrasonography, chest plain radiography, bone scintigraphy, and ultrasonography of the liver and axillary fossa) and whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MR including dedicated 18F-FDG PET/MR breast examinations. Each patient was discussed two times in a separate tumor board session to determine a total of three therapy recommendations based on histopathological data of the primary tumor and (1) traditional algorithm only, (2) traditional algorithm and 18F-FDG PET/MR, and (3) 18F-FDG PET/MR only. Major changes in therapy recommendations and differences between the traditional staging algorithm and 18F-FDG PET/MR for the TNM classification were evaluated. Results Staging by 18F-FDG PET/MR led to a difference in treatment compared the traditional staging algorithm in 8/56 cases (14%). Therapy changes included therapy of the breast, locoregional nodes and systemic therapy. A trend to staging superiority was found for 18F-FDG PET/MRI without statistical significance (p = 0.3827). Conclusion In conclusion, for breast cancer patients with elevated pre-test probability for distant metastases a change of the therapy regiment occurs in 14 % of patients when staged by 18F-FDG PET/MR and confirmed by histopathology compared to a traditional staging algorithm. In particular with regard to the amendment of the guideline further assessment of 18F-FDG-PET/MR in this setting is necessary to assess the true value of this modality.

To assess whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wb-MRI) for detection of biochemical recurrence in comparison toThis was a prospective trial including 28 consecutive patients (mean age 65.3 ± 9.0 years) with newly documented biochemical recurrence of Pca (mean prostate-specific antigen, PSA, 2.09 ± 1.95 ng/ml) following radical prostatectomy. All patients underwent both wb-MRI including a dedicated pelvic imaging protocol and PET/CT with 166 ± 35 MBqA total of 56 Pca lesions were detected in 20 of the 28 patients.

To compare the diagnostic performance ofIn this prospective study, a total of 84 patients (51 men, 33 women, mean age 62.5 ± 9.1 years) with histopathologically confirmed NSCLC underwentT stage was categorized concordantly in

To evaluate the accuracy of integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging for locoregional tumour evaluation compared to (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MR imaging in initial tumour and recurrence diagnosis in histopathologically confirmed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).(18)F-FDG PET/CT and integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging were performed for initial tumour staging or recurrence diagnosis in 25 patients with HNSCC. MR, fused (18)F-FDG PET/CT and fused (18)F-FDG PET/MR images were analysed by two independent readers in separate sessions in random order. In initial tumour staging, T and N staging was performed while individual lesions were analysed in patients with suspected cancer recurrence. In T and N staging, histopathological results after tumour resection served as the reference standard while histopathological sampling as well as cross-sectional and clinical follow-up were accepted in cancer recurrence diagnosis. The diagnostic accuracy of each modality was calculated separately for T and N staging as well as for tumour recurrence, and compared using McNemar's test. Values of p0.017 were considered statistically significant after Bonferroni correction.In 12 patients undergoing (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/MR for initial tumour staging, T staging was accurate in 50 % with MRI, in 59 % with PET/CT and in 75 % with PET/MR while N staging was accurate in 75 % with MRI, in 77 % with PET/CT and in 71 % with PET/MR in relation to the reference standard. No significant differences were observed in T and N staging among the three modalities (p 0.017). In 13 patients undergoing hybrid imaging for cancer recurrence diagnosis, diagnostic accuracy was 57 % with MRI and in 72 % with (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/MR, respectively. Again, no significant differences were found among the three modalities (p 0.017).In this initial study, no significant differences were found among (18)F-FDG PET/MR, (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in local tumour staging and cancer recurrence diagnosis.

To evaluate the diagnostic performance ofSeventy-one consecutive women (54 ± 13 years, range: 25-80 years) with suspected recurrence of cervical (32), ovarian (26), endometrial (7), vulvar (4), and vaginal (2) cancer underwent PET/MRI including a diagnostic contrast-enhanced MRI protocol. PET/MRI and MRI datasets were separately evaluated regarding lesion count, localization, categorization (benign/malignant), and diagnostic confidence (3-point scale; 1-3) by two physicians. The reference standard was based on histopathology results and follow-up imaging. Diagnostic accuracy and proportions of malignant and benign lesions rated correctly were retrospectively compared using McNemar's chiFifty-five patients showed cancer recurrence. PET/MRI correctly identified more patients with cancer recurrence than MRI alone (100% vs. 83.6%, p 0.01). In contrast to PET/MRI, MRI alone missed 4/15 patients with pelvic recurrence and miscategorized 8/40 patients with distant metastases as having local recurrence only. Based on the reference standard, 241 lesions were detected in the study cohort (181 malignant, 60 benign). While PET/MRI provided correct identification of 181/181 (100%) malignant lesions, MRI alone correctly identified 135/181 (74.6%) malignant lesions, which was significantly less compared to PET/MRI (p 0.001). PET/MRI offered superior diagnostic accuracy (99.2% vs. 79.3%, p 0.001) and diagnostic confidence in the categorization of malignant lesions compared with MRI alone (2.7 ± 0.5 vs. 2.4 ± 0.7, p 0.001).PET/MRI demonstrates excellent diagnostic performance and outperforms MRI alone for whole-body staging of women with suspected recurrent pelvic cancer, indicating potential changes in therapy management based on evaluation of local recurrence and distant metastatic spread.

The aim of the present study was to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of integrated PET/MRI and MRI alone for local tumor evaluation and whole-body tumor staging of primary cervical cancers. In addition, the corresponding impact on further patient management of the two imaging modalities was assessed.A total of 53 consecutive patients with histopathological verification of a primary cervical cancer were prospectively enrolled for a whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI examination. Two experienced physicians analyzed the MRI data, in consensus, followed by a second reading session of the PET/MRI datasets. The readers were asked to perform a dedicated TNM staging in accordance with the 7th edition of the AJCC staging manual. Subsequently, the results of MRI and PET/MRI were discussed in a simulated interdisciplinary tumor board and therapeutic decisions based on both imaging modalities were recorded. Results from histopathology and cross-sectional imaging follow-up served as the reference standard.PET/MRI allowed for a correct determination of the T stage in 45/53 (85%) cases, while MRI alone enabled a correct identification of the tumor stage in 46/53 (87%) cases. In 24 of the 53 patients, lymph node metastases were present. For the detection of nodal-positive patients, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PET/MRI were 83%, 90% and 87%, respectively. The respective values for MRI alone were 71%, 83% and 77%. In addition, PET/MRI showed higher values for the detection of distant metastases than MRI alone (sensitivity: 87% vs. 67%, specificity: 92% vs. 90%, diagnostic accuracy: 91% vs. 83%). Among the patients with discrepant staging results in the two imaging modalities, PET/MRI enabled correct treatment recommendations for a higher number (n = 9) of patients than MRI alone (n = 3).The present results demonstrate the successful application of integrated PET/MRI imaging for whole-body tumor staging of cervical cancer patients, enabling improved treatment planning when compared to MRI alone.

To investigate whether differences in thoracic tumour staging between 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MR imaging lead to different therapeutic decisions in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Seventy-seven NSCLC patients that underwent whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT from the base of skull to the upper thighs and thoracic PET/MR were enrolled in this retrospective study. Thoracic PET/CT and PET/MR images were staged according to the 7th edition of the AJCC staging manual. Staging results of both modalities were discussed separately in a simulated interdisciplinary tumour board and therapeutic decisions based on both imaging modalities were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the results and reasons for changes in the therapeutic decision were investigated. Staging results differed in 35 % of patients (27 patients) between thoracic PET/CT and PET/MR. Differences were detected when assessing the T-stage in 18 % (n = 14), the N-stage in 23 % (n = 18), and the M-stage in 1 % (n = 1). However, patient therapy management was changed in only six patients (8 %). Despite the variability of thoracic 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MR in TNM-staging, both modalities lead to comparable therapeutic decisions in patients suffering from NSCLC. Hence, 18F-FDG PET/MR can be considered an possible alternative to 18F-FDG PET/CT for clinical NSCLC staging. • PET/CT and PET/MR provide comparable results in early stages in NSCLC • Clinical impact of different staging results has not been investigated • PET/CT and PET/MR lead to comparable therapeutic decisions • PET/MR can be considered an alternative to PET/CT for NSCLC staging

PURPOSE We aimed to investigate the accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MRI) compared with contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the characterization of incidental tracer uptake in examinations of the head and neck. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 81 oncologic patients who underwent contrast-enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT and subsequent PET/MRI was performed by two readers for incidental tracer uptake. In a consensus reading, discrepancies were resolved. Each finding was either characterized as most likely benign, most likely malignant, or indeterminate. Using all available clinical information including results from histopathologic sampling and follow-up examinations, an expert reader classified each finding as benign or malignant. McNemar's test was used to compare the performance of both imaging modalities in characterizing incidental tracer uptake. RESULTS Forty-six lesions were detected by both modalities. On PET/CT, 27 lesions were classified as most likely benign, one as most likely malignant, and 18 as indeterminate; on PET/MRI, 31 lesions were classified as most likely benign, one lesion as most likely malignant, and 14 as indeterminate. Forty-three lesions were benign and one lesion was malignant according to the reference standard. In two lesions, a definite diagnosis was not possible. McNemar's test detected no differences concerning the correct classification of incidental tracer uptake between PET/CT and PET/MRI (P = 0.125). CONCLUSION In examinations of the head and neck area, incidental tracer uptake cannot be classified more accurately by PET/MRI than by PET/CT.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability ofTen patients with cervical facet syndrome (mean age: 65 ± 12 years) underwent

To investigate whether differences in thoracic tumour staging betweenSeventy-seven NSCLC patients that underwent whole-bodyStaging results differed in 35 % of patients (27 patients) between thoracic PET/CT and PET/MR. Differences were detected when assessing the T-stage in 18 % (n = 14), the N-stage in 23 % (n = 18), and the M-stage in 1 % (n = 1). However, patient therapy management was changed in only six patients (8 %).Despite the variability of thoracic• PET/CT and PET/MR provide comparable results in early stages in NSCLC • Clinical impact of different staging results has not been investigated • PET/CT and PET/MR lead to comparable therapeutic decisions • PET/MR can be considered an alternative to PET/CT for NSCLC staging.

Purpose This study aims to compare staging results of 18 F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) and integrated PET/magnetic resonance (MR) in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients and to investigate a potential apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)/SUV correlation. Materials and methods Six patients with MPM underwent 18 F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MR including diffusion-weighted imaging. Thoracic TNM staging was performed for both modalities. SUV and ADC were assessed in therapy-naive pleural lesions. Results In thoracic TNM staging, no differences were found between PET/CT and PET/MR. An inverse correlation was observed between SUV mean and ADC min ( r =−0.63, P =.002). Conclusion MPM can be staged using PET/MR. The inverse correlation ADC/SUV indicates that future research on multiparametric therapy response evaluation may be warranted.

To compare the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging ((18)F-FDG PET/MRI) with (18)F-FDG PET/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT), MRI, and CT in whole-body staging of recurrent breast cancer.Twenty-one consecutive patients (age 59.4 ± 11.5 years, range 38.5-76.9 years; 20 female, 1 male) with suspected breast cancer recurrence underwent a clinically indicated (18)F-FDG PET/CT and subsequently a (18)F-FDG PET/MRI examination in a single injection protocol (mean injected activity: 257 ± 44 MBq (18)F-FDG). Each (18)F-FDG PET/MRI, (18)F-FDG PET/CT, as well as the CT component of PET/CT (CTPET/CT) and MR images of PET/MRI (MRIPET/MRI) were separately evaluated by two radiologists regarding lesion count, lesion localization, and lesion categorization (benign/malignant). The reference standard was based on histopathological results as well as prior and follow-up imaging. A Wilcoxon test assessed differences in SUVmax between (18)F-FDG PET/MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Correlation of SUVmax between (18)F-FDG PET/MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT was calculated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Interobserver agreement on dignity ratings was evaluated using Cohen's kappa.According to the reference standard, 17 patients had breast cancer recurrence. (18)F-FDG PET/MRI, (18)F-FDG PET/CT, and MRIPET/MRI correctly identified each of the 17 patients, whereas CTPET/CT correctly identified 15 of the 17 patients. A total of 134 lesions were described (116 malignant, 18 benign). (18)F-FDG PET/MRI detected all 134 lesions, of which (18)F-FDG PET/CT, MRIPET/MRI, and CTPET/CT detected 97.0%, 96.2%, and 74.6%, respectively. (18)F-FDG PET/MRI yielded the highest proportion of correctly categorized lesions (98.5%) compared with (18)F-FDG PET/CT (94.8%), MRIPET/MRI (88.1%), and CTPET/CT (57.5%). SUVmax was strongly correlated (r=0.72) but measured significantly higher on (18)F-FDG PET/MRI than on (18)F-FDG PET/CT in corresponding PET-positive lesions (SUVmax: 5.6 ± 2.8 vs. 4.9 ± 1.8; p=0.001). Interobserver agreement on lesion dignity was substantial with (18)F-FDG PET/MRI (k=0.65; p0.001) and (18)F-FDG PET/CT (k=0.65; p0.001). With MRIPET/MRI interobserver analysis yielded a moderate agreement (k=0.56; p0.001), whereas there was only fair agreement evaluating the CTPET/CT datasets (k=0.31; p=0.002).(18)F-FDG PET/MRI offered the highest diagnostic performance compared with (18)F-FDG PET/CT, MRI and CT. Thus, (18)F-FDG PET/MRI should be regarded as a valuable alternative in whole-body staging of recurrent breast cancer.

Our objective was to compare (18)F-FDG PET/MRI (performed using a contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed volume-interpolated breath-hold examination [VIBE]) with (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detecting and characterizing lung lesions in oncologic patients.In 121 oncologic patients with 241 lung lesions, PET/MRI was performed after PET/CT in a single-injection protocol (260 ± 58 MBq of (18)F-FDG). The detection rates were computed for MRI, the PET component of PET/CT, and the PET component of PET/MRI in relation to the CT component of PET/CT. Wilcoxon testing was used to assess differences in lesion contrast (4-point scale) and size between morphologic datasets and differences in image quality (4-point scale), SUVmean, SUVmax, and characterization (benign/malignant) between PET/MRI and PET/CT. Correlation was determined using the Pearson coefficient (r) for SUV and size and the Spearman rank coefficient (ρ) for contrast.The detection rates for MRI, the PET component of PET/CT, and the PET component of PET/MRI were 66.8%, 42.7%, and 42.3%, respectively. There was a strong correlation in size (r= 0.98) and SUV (r= 0.91) and a moderate correlation in contrast (ρ = 0.48). Image quality was better for PET/CT than for PET/MRI (P0.001). Lesion measurements were smaller for MRI than for CT (P0.001). SUVmax and SUVmean were significantly higher for PET/MRI than for PET/CT (P0.001 each). There was no significant difference in lesion contrast (P= 0.11) or characterization (P= 0.076).In the detection and characterization of lung lesions 10 mm or larger, (18)F-FDG PET/MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT perform comparably. Lesion size, SUV and characterization correlate strongly between the two modalities. However, the overall detection rate of PET/MRI remains inferior to that of PET/CT because of the limited ability of MRI to detect lesions smaller than 10 mm. Thus, thoracic staging with PET/MRI bears a risk of missing small lung metastases.

Objective To evaluate different magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences in integrated positron emission tomography (PET)/MR concerning their ability to detect tumors and allocate increased radionuclide uptake on 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET in intraindividual comparison with computed tomography (CT) from PET/CT. Material and methods Sixty-one patients (34 female, 27 male, mean age 57.6y) who were examined with contrast-enhanced PET/CT and subsequent PET/MR (mean delay for PET/MR after injection: 147±43min) were included. A maximum of ten 18 F-FDG-avid lesions per patient were analyzed on CT from PET/CT and with the following MR sequences from PET/MR: T2, turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM), non-enhanced T1, contrast-enhanced T1, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). All lesions were rated using a four-point ordinal scale (scored from 0 to 3) concerning visual detectability of the lesion against the surrounding background and anatomical allocation of the PET finding. In each category (detectability and allocation), Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed. Bonferroni–Holm correction was performed to prevent α-error accumulation. Results In 225 18 F-FDG-avid lesions (156 confirmed as malignant by radiological follow up, 69 by histopathology), visual detectability was comparably high on CT (mean: 2.5±0.9), TIRM (mean: 2.5±0.9), T2 (mean: 2.4±0.9), and DWI (mean: 2.5±1.0) and was significantly higher than on non-enhanced T1 (mean: 2.2±1.0). While anatomic allocation of the PET finding was comparable with CT (mean: 2.6±0.7), T2 (mean: 2.6±0.7), and TIRM (mean: 2.8±0.7), it was significantly higher compared to DWI (mean: 2.1±1.0) and non-enhanced T1 (mean: 2.4±0.8). Conclusion In conclusion, T2, TIRM, and contrast-enhanced T1 provide a high quality of lesion detectability and anatomical allocation of FDG-avid foci. Their performance is at least comparable to contrast-enhanced PET/CT. Non-enhanced T1 may be omitted and the necessity of DWI should be further investigated for specific questions, such as assessment of the liver.

Objective To compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in lymph node metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with standardized uptake values (SUV) derived from combined 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MRI). Material and Methods 38 patients with histopathologically proven NSCLC (mean age 60.1 ± 9.5y) received whole-body PET/CT (Siemens mCT™) 60min after injection of a mean dose of 280 ± 50 MBq 18F-FDG and subsequent PET/MRI (mean time after tracer injection: 139 ± 26 min, Siemens Biograph mMR). During PET acquisition, simultaneous diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI, b values: 0, 500, 1000 s/mm²) was performed. A maximum of 10 lymph nodes per patient suspicious for malignancy were analyzed. Regions of interest (ROI) were drawn covering the entire lymph node on the attenuation-corrected PET-image and the monoexponential ADC-map. According to histopathology or radiological follow-up, lymph nodes were classified as benign or malignant. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated for all lymph node metastases correlating SUVmax and SUVmean with ADCmean. Results A total of 146 suspicious lymph nodes were found in 25 patients. One hundred lymph nodes were eligible for final analysis. Ninety-one lymph nodes were classified as malignant and 9 as benign according to the reference standard. In malignant lesions, mean SUVmax was 9.1 ± 3.8 and mean SUVmean was 6.0 ± 2.5 while mean ADCmean was 877.0 ± 128.6 x10-5 mm²/s in PET/MRI. For all malignant lymph nodes, a weak, inverse correlation between SUVmax and ADCmean as well as SUVmean and ADCmean (r = -0.30, p