Search

Background: Anastomotic leak at the gastrojejunostomy is a life-threatening complication of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Fibrin sealants have been used as topical adjuncts to reduce leaks at the gastrojejunostomy. Our clinical observations suggest that an unintended consequence may be the promotion of anastomotic stricture. We hypothesized that the use of fibrin sealant at the gastrojejunostomy in patients undergoing LRYGB decreases the incidence of anastomotic leak but increases the incidence of clinically significant stricture., Methods: Following institutional review board approval, medical records of patients undergoing LRYGB by two surgeons at a single institution over a 5-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative demographics and postoperative complication rates including incidence of gastrojejunostomy leak and endoscopically diagnosed stricture requiring dilation within 1 year of surgery were recorded., Results: Four hundred twenty-five patients had fibrin sealant routinely applied to their gastrojejunostomy site and 104 did not. Four leaks occurred in the sealant group and two leaks occurred in the control group (p = 0.2). Of patients who received sealant, 1.6 % needed postoperative blood transfusion compared to 4.8%of those who did not receive sealant (p=0.05) [corrected]. There was a significantly increased rate of strictures requiring dilation in the sealant group (11.3% compared to 4.8% stricture rate in patients who did not receive sealant, p = 0.04)., Conclusions: In our experience, the use of fibrin sealant at linear stapled gastrojejunostomy site during LRYGB increases the incidence of clinically significant postoperative stricture and does not reduce the incidence of anastomotic leak.

Background: There is no consensus on the ideal gastrojejunostomy anastomosis (GJA) technique in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). We reviewed our experience with three GJA techniques (hand-sewn (HSA), linear-stapled (LSA), and 25-mm circular-stapled (CSA)) to determine which anastomosis technique is associated with the lowest early (60-day) anastomotic complication rates., Methods: From November 2004 through December 2009, 882 consecutive patients underwent LRYGB using three GJA techniques: HSA, LSA, and CSA. All patients had a minimum of 2 months follow-up. Records were reviewed for postoperative gastrojejunostomy leak, stricture, and marginal ulcer, and these early complications were classified according to anastomosis technique. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine associations between complications and anastomosis technique., Results: Preoperative demographics, length of hospital stay, and postoperative follow-up did not differ between the three groups. The majority of patients underwent LSA (n = 514, 61.6%) followed by HSA (n = 180, 21.6%) and CSA (n = 140, 16.8%). Using multivariate analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in the rates of leak (LSA 1.0%, HSA 1.1%, CSA 0.0%, p = 0.480), stricture (LSA 6.0%, HSA 6.1%, CSA 4.3%, p = 0.657), or marginal ulcer (LSA 8.0%, HSA 7.7%, CSA 3.6%, p = 0.180)., Conclusions: The three techniques can be used safely with a low complication rate. Our data do not identify a superior anastomosis technique.

Pilonidal disease is a common anorectal problem that typically affects young people. Numerous surgical procedures have been described, but treatment failure and disease recurrence are frequent, leading to considerable morbidity in these otherwise healthy patients. To manage this problem successfully, surgeons must consider the pathogenesis and presentation of the disease and weigh the advantages and disadvantages of any operation. Discussed in this article are the pathogenesis of pilonidal disease and basic treatment options for acute pilonidal abscesses, sinus tracts, and chronic or recurrent pilonidal disease.

Complex pilonidal disease, an uncommon manifestation of an anorectal condition, is characterized by chronic or recurrent abscesses with extensive, branching sinus tracts. Definitive treatment requires wide excision of all involved tissue followed by secondary intention healing or reconstructive surgery. All treatment options have unique advantages and disadvantages. Following recent reports that negative pressure wound therapy after surgery for complex pilonidal disease may be a useful alternative to moist saline dressing treatments, five patients (three men and two women, median age 21 years [range: 16 to 63 years]) with complex pilonidal disease (symptom duration range 6 months to 30 years) were treated on an outpatient basis. Following wide excision under general anesthesia, a portable negative pressure wound therapy device was applied. Mean wound defect size after excision was 11 cm x 4 cm x 5 cm, or 205 cm(3) (range 90 cm(3) to 410 cm(3)). Negative pressure wound therapy was used for an average of 6 weeks (range 4 to 9 weeks) and mean time to complete epithelialization was 12 weeks (range 9 to 22 weeks), including use of moist saline dressings post negative pressure wound therapy. Treatment was discontinued in one patient due to skin irritation. No other complications were observed. Long-term follow-up is required to assess the risk of recurrent pilonidal disease or wound failure following negative pressure wound therapy. Additional studies of negative pressure wound therapy in the management of pilonidal disease are warranted.