Search

Uterine myometrial tumors are predominantly benign conditions that affect one-third of women and represent the main indication for hysterectomy. Preoperative imaging is of utmost importance for characterization and for precise mapping of myometrial tumors to best guide therapeutic strategy. New minimally invasive therapeutic strategies including morcellation, myolysis, uterine artery embolization and image-guided radiofrequency or focused ultrasound ablation have been developed for the treatment of uterine leiomyoma. However, preoperative differentiation between atypical leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas is critical on imaging as uterine sarcoma requires a specific surgical technique to prevent dissemination. A single, rapidly growing uterine tumor, associated with endometrial thickening and ascites, in post-menopausal women is suspicious of uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma and carcinosarcoma. Suggestive magnetic resonance imaging features have been described, but overlap in imaging appearance between uterine leiomyosarcomas and cellular leiomyomas makes it challenging to ascertain the diagnosis. This review aims to illustrate the imaging features of uterine sarcomas and potential mimickers to make the reader more familiar with this serious condition which needs special consideration.

The Trabecular Bone Score is a rather new index obtained at the lumbar spine at the same time as a real bone mineral density. It was developed to reflect bone microarchitecture. It was proposed to be easily used in everyday practice as a surrogate of bone strength. Our aim was to review 1. technical points such as correlations between Trabecular Bone Score and bone microarchitectural parameters, Trabecular Bone Score and bone strength, the effects of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry image spatial resolution, age, macroarchitecture, body mass index, and osteoarthritis, on Trabecular Bone Score, and 2. evidences to use Trabecular Bone Score for separating individuals with fragility fractures from controls, predicting fragility fractures, and for longitudinally monitoring changes related to treatments. Correlations between Trabecular Bone Score and bone microarchitectural parameters vary widely across bone sites, microarchitectural parameters, and study designs. In vivo, the Trabecular Bone Score explains little of the variance in trabecular microarchitectural parameters. We emphasize that it is a texture parameter. The Trabecular Bone Score is reduced in patients with fragility fracture. Several retrospective and prospective studies have shown its discriminative ability regarding the fracture risk. When combining the areal Bone mineral Density and Trabecular Bone Score, the Trabecular Bone Score remains a predictor of fracture but not the areal Bone Mineral Density. However in prospective studies, the best predictor of fracture remains hip areal bone mineral density. Due to the lack of evidence, we recommend not to use Trabecular Bone Score for following patients treated by anti-osteoporotic drugs., (Copyright © 2015 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing invasive placenta (IP)., Materials and Methods: MRI findings in 32 women with suspected IP were evaluated independently by four readers. Interobserver agreement was calculated with kappa (κ) statistics. Associations between MRI findings and IP were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of IP were estimated., Results: Sixteen women (16/32; 50%) had confirmed IP. Interobserver correlation for the diagnosis of IP was fair (κ = 0.40). Univariate analysis revealed that thinning or focal defect of the uteroplacental interface (P < 0.0001) was the most discriminating MRI variable in the differentiation between normal and IP. Overall sensitivity and specificity of MRI for the diagnosis of IP were 84% [95% CI: 75-94%] and 80% [95% CI: 66-93%], respectively. Thinning or focal defect of the uteroplacental interface was the most accurate finding (88%) in the diagnosis of IP. Multivariate analysis revealed that thinning or focal defect of the uteroplacental interface was the single independent predictor of IP (P = 0.0006; OR = 64.99)., Conclusion: MR imaging has 84% sensitivity [95% CI: 75-94%] and 80% specificity [95% CI: 66-93%] for the diagnosis of IP. Thinning or focal defect of the uteroplacental interface is the most discriminating independent MR variable in differentiating between normal placenta and IP., Key Points: MR imaging has acceptable degrees of accuracy to diagnose invasive placenta. Focal uteroplacental interface defect is the best finding to diagnose invasive placenta. Focal uteroplacental interface defect is the single independent predictor of invasive placenta.

The objective of this systematic literature review is to discuss the latest French recommendation issued in 2012 that a fall within the past year should lead to bone mineral density (BMD) measurement using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This recommendation rests on four facts. First, osteoporosis and fall risk are the two leading risk factors for nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women. Second, BMD measurement using DXA supplies significant information on the fracture risk independently from the fall risk. Thus, when a fall occurs, the fracture risk increases as BMD decreases. Third, osteoporosis drugs have been proven effective in preventing fractures only in populations with osteoporosis defined based on BMD criteria. Finally, the prevalence of osteoporosis is high in patients who fall and increases in the presence of markers for frailty (e.g., recurrent falls, sarcopenia [low muscle mass and strength], limited mobility, and weight loss), which are risk factors for both osteoporosis and falls. Nevertheless, life expectancy should be taken into account when assessing the appropriateness of DXA in fallers, as osteoporosis treatments require at least 12months to decrease the fracture risk. Another relevant factor is the availability of DXA, which may be limited due to geographic factors, patient dependency, or severe cognitive impairments, for instance. Studies are needed to better determine how the fall risk and frailty should be incorporated into the fracture risk evaluation based on BMD and the FRAX® tool., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier SAS.)

Objectives: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has attained a solid position in the diagnosis of breast cancer but its benefit is still to be confirmed in the preoperative staging. The authors assessed the impact of preoperative breast MRI on surgical management of breast cancer in two university hospitals., Patients and Methods: This retrospective review was realized in two university hospitals and concerned all patients with breast carcinoma who had a surgical first therapy. We selected 89 patients who underwent preoperative breast MRI in the period between January 2008 and December 2009., Results: The sensitivity of breast MRI for detecting breast tumor was 95%. Fourteen percent of patients had a multifocal disease, 10% a multicentric disease and 2% a synchronous bilateral cancer. The correlation of radiological tumor size with histopathological size was r=0.68 in IRM compared to r=0.45 in conventional imaging (P<0.001). Nineteen additional biopsies were performed and 9.9% of false-positive findings were detected. Retrospectively, planned surgical management was altered in 9% of patients, resulted from use of breast MRI. Six patients had conversion of planned breast conservation to mastectomy and two patients underwent contralateral lumpectomy after discover synchronous bilateral cancer., Discussion and Conclusion: Breast MRI was very sensitive for the detection of breast carcinoma and improved local staging in almost 9% of patients. But, low specificity of this imaging requires a systematically validation of additional lesions by biopsy before surgical planning., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)