Search

Your search keyword '"Bencivenga, M"' showing total 242 results
Start Over Author "Bencivenga, M"
242 results on '"Bencivenga, M"'

1. Tremelimumab and durvalumab as neoadjuvant or non-operative management strategy of patients with microsatellite instability-high resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the INFINITY study by GONO

Author

Raimondi, A., Lonardi, S., Murgioni, S., Cardellino, G.G., Tamberi, S., Strippoli, A., Palermo, F., De Manzoni, G., Bencivenga, M., Bittoni, A., Chiodoni, C., Lorenzini, D., Todoerti, K., Manca, P., Sangaletti, S., Prisciandaro, M., Randon, G., Nichetti, F., Bergamo, F., Brich, S., Belfiore, A., Bertolotti, A., Stetco, D., Guidi, A., Torelli, T., Vingiani, A., Joshi, R.P., Khoshdeli, M., Beaubier, N., Stumpe, M.C., Nappo, F., Leone, A.G., Pircher, C.C., Leoncini, G., Sabella, G., Airo’ Farulla, L., Alessi, A., Morano, F., Martinetti, A., Niger, M., Fassan, M., Di Maio, M., Kaneva, K., Milione, M., Nimeiri, H., Sposito, C., Agnelli, L., Mazzaferro, V., Di Bartolomeo, M., and Pietrantonio, F.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Mucin expression in gastric- and gastro-oesophageal signet-ring cell cancer: results from a comprehensive literature review and a large cohort study of Caucasian and Asian gastric cancer

Author

Kerckhoffs, K. G. P., Liu, D. H. W., Saragoni, L., van der Post, R. S., Langer, R., Bencivenga, M., Iglesias, M., Gallo, G., Hewitt, L. C., Fazzi, G. E., Vos, A. M., Renaud, F., Yoshikawa, T., Oshima, T., Tomezzoli, A., de Manzoni, G., Arai, T., Kushima, R., Carneiro, F., and Grabsch, H. I.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Open versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of survival in a western population—on behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer

Author

Lombardi, P, Bernasconi, D, Baiocchi, G, Berselli, M, Biondi, A, Castoro, C, Catarci, M, Degiuli, M, Fumagalli Romario, U, Giacopuzzi, S, Marchesi, F, Marrelli, D, Mazzola, M, Molfino, S, Olmi, S, Rausei, S, Rosa, F, Rosati, R, Roviello, F, Santi, S, Solaini, L, Staderini, F, Vigano, J, Ferrari, G, Agnes, A, Alfieri, S, Alloggio, M, Bencivenga, M, Benedetti, M, Bottari, A, Cianchi, F, Cocozza, E, Dalmonte, G, De Martini, P, De Pascale, S, Desio, M, Emiliani, G, Ercolani, G, Galli, F, Garosio, I, Giani, A, Gualtierotti, M, Marano, L, Morgagni, P, Peri, A, Puccetti, F, Reddavid, R, Uccelli, M, Lombardi P. M., Bernasconi D., Baiocchi G. L., Berselli M., Biondi A., Castoro C., Catarci M., Degiuli M., Fumagalli Romario U., Giacopuzzi S., Marchesi F., Marrelli D., Mazzola M., Molfino S., Olmi S., Rausei S., Rosa F., Rosati R., Roviello F., Santi S., Solaini L., Staderini F., Vigano J., Ferrari G., Agnes A., Alfieri S., Alloggio M., Bencivenga M., Benedetti M., Bottari A., Cianchi F., Cocozza E., Dalmonte G., De Martini P., De Pascale S., Desio M., Emiliani G., Ercolani G., Galli F., Garosio I., Giani A., Gualtierotti M., Marano L., Morgagni P., Peri A., Puccetti F., Reddavid R., Uccelli M., Lombardi, P, Bernasconi, D, Baiocchi, G, Berselli, M, Biondi, A, Castoro, C, Catarci, M, Degiuli, M, Fumagalli Romario, U, Giacopuzzi, S, Marchesi, F, Marrelli, D, Mazzola, M, Molfino, S, Olmi, S, Rausei, S, Rosa, F, Rosati, R, Roviello, F, Santi, S, Solaini, L, Staderini, F, Vigano, J, Ferrari, G, Agnes, A, Alfieri, S, Alloggio, M, Bencivenga, M, Benedetti, M, Bottari, A, Cianchi, F, Cocozza, E, Dalmonte, G, De Martini, P, De Pascale, S, Desio, M, Emiliani, G, Ercolani, G, Galli, F, Garosio, I, Giani, A, Gualtierotti, M, Marano, L, Morgagni, P, Peri, A, Puccetti, F, Reddavid, R, Uccelli, M, Lombardi P. M., Bernasconi D., Baiocchi G. L., Berselli M., Biondi A., Castoro C., Catarci M., Degiuli M., Fumagalli Romario U., Giacopuzzi S., Marchesi F., Marrelli D., Mazzola M., Molfino S., Olmi S., Rausei S., Rosa F., Rosati R., Roviello F., Santi S., Solaini L., Staderini F., Vigano J., Ferrari G., Agnes A., Alfieri S., Alloggio M., Bencivenga M., Benedetti M., Bottari A., Cianchi F., Cocozza E., Dalmonte G., De Martini P., De Pascale S., Desio M., Emiliani G., Ercolani G., Galli F., Garosio I., Giani A., Gualtierotti M., Marano L., Morgagni P., Peri A., Puccetti F., Reddavid R., and Uccelli M.

Abstract

Background: Oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in the West have been poorly investigated. The aim of the present study was to compare survival outcomes in patients undergoing curative-intent laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in several centres belonging to the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer. Methods: Data of patients operated between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Propensity Score Matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics of patients undergoing laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival. Secondary endpoints were 3-year disease-free survival and short-term outcomes. Multivariable regression analyses for survival were conducted. Results: Data were retrieved from 20 centres. Of the 717 patients included, 438 patients were correctly matched, 219 per group. The 3-year overall survival was 73.6% and 68.7% in the laparoscopic and open group, respectively (p = 0.40). When compared with open gastrectomy, laparoscopic gastrectomy showed comparable 3-year disease-free survival (62.8%, vs 58.9%, p = 0.40), higher rate of return to intended oncologic treatment (56.9% vs 40.2%, p = 0.001), similar 30-day morbidity/mortality. Prognostic factors for survival were ASA Score ≥ 3, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 5, lymph node ratio ≥ 0.15, p/ypTNM Stage III and return to intended oncologic treatment. Conclusions: Laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer offers similar rates of survival when compared to open gastrectomy, with higher rates of return to intended oncologic treatment. ASA score, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, lymph node ratio, return to intended oncologic treatment and p/ypTNM Stage, but not surgical approach, are prognostic factors for survival.

Published
2022

8. Current practice on the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy in Italy: the Abdominal Drain in Gastrectomy (ADiGe) survey

Author

Mengardo, V, Weindelmayer, J, Veltri, A, Giacopuzzi, S, Torroni, L, de Manzoni, G, Agresta, F, Alfieri, R, Alfieri, S, Antonacci, N, Baiocchi, G, Bencini, L, Bencivenga, M, Benedetti, M, Berselli, M, Biondi, A, Capolupo, G, Carboni, F, Casadei, R, Casella, F, Catarci, M, Cerri, P, Chiari, D, Cocozza, E, Colombo, G, Cozzaglio, L, Dalmonte, G, Degiuli, M, De Luca, M, De Luca, R, De Manzini, N, De Pasqual, C, De Pascale, S, De Ruvo, N, Di Cosmo, M, Di Leo, A, Di Paola, M, Elio, A, Ferrara, F, Ferrari, G, Fiscon, V, Fumagalli, U, Garulli, G, Gennai, A, Gentile, I, Germani, P, Gualtierotti, M, Guerini, F, Gurrado, A, Inama, M, La Torre, F, Laterza, E, Losurdo, P, Macri, A, Marano, A, Marano, L, Marchesi, F, Marino, F, Massani, M, Menghi, R, Milone, M, Molfino, S, Montuori, M, Moretto, G, Morgagni, P, Morpurgo, E, Abdallah, M, Nespoli, L, Olmi, S, Palaia, R, Pallabazer, G, Parise, P, Pasculli, A, Pericoli Ridolfini, M, Pesce, A, Pinotti, E, Pisano, M, Poiasina, E, Postiglione, V, Rausei, S, Rella, A, Rosa, F, Rosati, R, Rossi, G, Rossit, L, Rovatti, M, Ruspi, L, Sacco, L, Saladino, E, Sansonetti, A, Sartori, A, Scaglione, D, Scaringi, S, Schoenthaler, C, Sena, G, Simone, M, Solaini, L, Strignano, P, Tartaglia, N, Testa, S, Testini, M, Tiberio, G, Treppiedi, E, Vagliasindi, A, Valmasoni, M, Vigano, J, Zanchettin, G, Zanoni, A, Zardini, C, Zerbinati, A, Mengardo V., Weindelmayer J., Veltri A., Giacopuzzi S., Torroni L., de Manzoni G., Agresta F., Alfieri R., Alfieri S., Antonacci N., Baiocchi G. L., Bencini L., Bencivenga M., Benedetti M., Berselli M., Biondi A., Capolupo G. T., Carboni F., Casadei R., Casella F., Catarci M., Cerri P., Chiari D., Cocozza E., Colombo G., Cozzaglio L., Dalmonte G., Degiuli M., De Luca M., De Luca R., De Manzini N., De Pasqual C. A., De Pascale S., De Ruvo N., Di Cosmo M., Di Leo A., Di Paola M., Elio A., Ferrara F., Ferrari G., Fiscon V., Fumagalli U., Garulli G., Gennai A., Gentile I., Germani P., Gualtierotti M., Guerini F., Gurrado A., Inama M., La Torre F., Laterza E., Losurdo P., Macri A., Marano A., Marano L., Marchesi F., Marino F., Massani M., Menghi R., Milone M., Molfino S., Montuori M., Moretto G., Morgagni P., Morpurgo E., Abdallah M., Nespoli L., Olmi S., Palaia R., Pallabazer G., Parise P., Pasculli A., Pericoli Ridolfini M., Pesce A., Pinotti E., Pisano M., Poiasina E., Postiglione V., Rausei S., Rella A., Rosa F., Rosati R., Rossi G., Rossit L., Rovatti M., Ruspi L., Sacco L., Saladino E., Sansonetti A., Sartori A., Scaglione D., Scaringi S., Schoenthaler C., Sena G., Simone M., Solaini L., Strignano P., Tartaglia N., Testa S., Testini M., Tiberio G. A. M., Treppiedi E., Vagliasindi A., Valmasoni M., Vigano J., Zanchettin G., Zanoni A., Zardini C., Zerbinati A., Mengardo, V, Weindelmayer, J, Veltri, A, Giacopuzzi, S, Torroni, L, de Manzoni, G, Agresta, F, Alfieri, R, Alfieri, S, Antonacci, N, Baiocchi, G, Bencini, L, Bencivenga, M, Benedetti, M, Berselli, M, Biondi, A, Capolupo, G, Carboni, F, Casadei, R, Casella, F, Catarci, M, Cerri, P, Chiari, D, Cocozza, E, Colombo, G, Cozzaglio, L, Dalmonte, G, Degiuli, M, De Luca, M, De Luca, R, De Manzini, N, De Pasqual, C, De Pascale, S, De Ruvo, N, Di Cosmo, M, Di Leo, A, Di Paola, M, Elio, A, Ferrara, F, Ferrari, G, Fiscon, V, Fumagalli, U, Garulli, G, Gennai, A, Gentile, I, Germani, P, Gualtierotti, M, Guerini, F, Gurrado, A, Inama, M, La Torre, F, Laterza, E, Losurdo, P, Macri, A, Marano, A, Marano, L, Marchesi, F, Marino, F, Massani, M, Menghi, R, Milone, M, Molfino, S, Montuori, M, Moretto, G, Morgagni, P, Morpurgo, E, Abdallah, M, Nespoli, L, Olmi, S, Palaia, R, Pallabazer, G, Parise, P, Pasculli, A, Pericoli Ridolfini, M, Pesce, A, Pinotti, E, Pisano, M, Poiasina, E, Postiglione, V, Rausei, S, Rella, A, Rosa, F, Rosati, R, Rossi, G, Rossit, L, Rovatti, M, Ruspi, L, Sacco, L, Saladino, E, Sansonetti, A, Sartori, A, Scaglione, D, Scaringi, S, Schoenthaler, C, Sena, G, Simone, M, Solaini, L, Strignano, P, Tartaglia, N, Testa, S, Testini, M, Tiberio, G, Treppiedi, E, Vagliasindi, A, Valmasoni, M, Vigano, J, Zanchettin, G, Zanoni, A, Zardini, C, Zerbinati, A, Mengardo V., Weindelmayer J., Veltri A., Giacopuzzi S., Torroni L., de Manzoni G., Agresta F., Alfieri R., Alfieri S., Antonacci N., Baiocchi G. L., Bencini L., Bencivenga M., Benedetti M., Berselli M., Biondi A., Capolupo G. T., Carboni F., Casadei R., Casella F., Catarci M., Cerri P., Chiari D., Cocozza E., Colombo G., Cozzaglio L., Dalmonte G., Degiuli M., De Luca M., De Luca R., De Manzini N., De Pasqual C. A., De Pascale S., De Ruvo N., Di Cosmo M., Di Leo A., Di Paola M., Elio A., Ferrara F., Ferrari G., Fiscon V., Fumagalli U., Garulli G., Gennai A., Gentile I., Germani P., Gualtierotti M., Guerini F., Gurrado A., Inama M., La Torre F., Laterza E., Losurdo P., Macri A., Marano A., Marano L., Marchesi F., Marino F., Massani M., Menghi R., Milone M., Molfino S., Montuori M., Moretto G., Morgagni P., Morpurgo E., Abdallah M., Nespoli L., Olmi S., Palaia R., Pallabazer G., Parise P., Pasculli A., Pericoli Ridolfini M., Pesce A., Pinotti E., Pisano M., Poiasina E., Postiglione V., Rausei S., Rella A., Rosa F., Rosati R., Rossi G., Rossit L., Rovatti M., Ruspi L., Sacco L., Saladino E., Sansonetti A., Sartori A., Scaglione D., Scaringi S., Schoenthaler C., Sena G., Simone M., Solaini L., Strignano P., Tartaglia N., Testa S., Testini M., Tiberio G. A. M., Treppiedi E., Vagliasindi A., Valmasoni M., Vigano J., Zanchettin G., Zanoni A., Zardini C., and Zerbinati A.

Abstract

Evidence against the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy are increasing and ERAS guidelines suggest the benefit of drain avoidance. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether this practice is still widespread. We conducted a survey among Italian surgeons through the Italian Gastric Cancer Research Group and the Polispecialistic Society of Young Surgeons, aiming to understand the current use of prophylactic drain. A 28-item questionnaire-based survey was developed to analyze the current practice and the individual opinion about the use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy. Groups based on age, experience and unit volume were separately analyzed. Response of 104 surgeons from 73 surgical units were collected. A standardized ERAS protocol for gastrectomy was applied by 42% of the respondents. Most of the surgeons, regardless of age, experience, or unit volume, declared to routinely place one or more drain after gastrectomy. Only 2 (1.9%) and 7 surgeons (6.7%) belonging to high volume units, do not routinely place drains after total and subtotal gastrectomy, respectively. More than 60% of the participants remove the drain on postoperative day 4–6 after performing an assessment of the anastomosis integrity. Interestingly, less than half of the surgeons believe that drain is the main tool for leak management, and this percentage further drops among younger surgeons. On the other hand, drain’s role seems to be more defined for duodenal stump leak treatment, with almost 50% of the surgeons recognizing its importance. Routine use of prophylactic drain after gastrectomy is still a widespread practice even if younger surgeons are more persuaded that it could not be advantageous.

Published
2022

9. Definition, diagnosis and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer: A Delphi consensus study in Europe

Author

Kroese, T.E., Laarhoven, H.W.M. van, Schoppman, S.F., Deseyne, P., Cutsem, E. Van, Haustermans, K., Nafteux, P., Thomas, M., Obermannova, R., Mortensen, H.R., Nordsmark, M., Pfeiffer, P., Elme, A., Adenis, A., Piessen, G., Bruns, C.J., Lordick, F., Gockel, I., Moehler, M., Gani, C., Liakakos, T., Reynolds, J., Morganti, A.G., Rosati, R., Castoro, C., Cellini, F., D'Ugo, D., Roviello, F., Bencivenga, M., Manzoni, G. de, Henegouwen, M.I. van Berge, Hulshof, M., Dieren, J. van, Vollebergh, M., Sandick, J.W. van, Jeene, P., Muijs, C.T., Slingerland, M., Voncken, F.E.M., Hartgrink, H., Creemers, G.J., Sangen, M.J. van der, Nieuwenhuijzen, G., Berbee, M., Verheij, M., Wijnhoven, B., Beerepoot, L.V., Mohammad, N.H., Mook, S., Ruurda, J.P., Kolodziejczyk, P., Polkowski, W.P., Wyrwicz, L., Alsina, M., Pera, M., Kanonnikoff, T.F., Cervantes, A., Nilsson, M., Monig, S., Wagner, A.D., Guckenberger, M., Griffiths, E.A., Smyth, E., Hanna, G.B., Markar, S., Chaudry, M.A., Hawkins, M.A., Cheong, E., Rütten, H., Gootjes, E.C., Hillegersberg, R. van, Rossum, P.S.N. van, Kroese, T.E., Laarhoven, H.W.M. van, Schoppman, S.F., Deseyne, P., Cutsem, E. Van, Haustermans, K., Nafteux, P., Thomas, M., Obermannova, R., Mortensen, H.R., Nordsmark, M., Pfeiffer, P., Elme, A., Adenis, A., Piessen, G., Bruns, C.J., Lordick, F., Gockel, I., Moehler, M., Gani, C., Liakakos, T., Reynolds, J., Morganti, A.G., Rosati, R., Castoro, C., Cellini, F., D'Ugo, D., Roviello, F., Bencivenga, M., Manzoni, G. de, Henegouwen, M.I. van Berge, Hulshof, M., Dieren, J. van, Vollebergh, M., Sandick, J.W. van, Jeene, P., Muijs, C.T., Slingerland, M., Voncken, F.E.M., Hartgrink, H., Creemers, G.J., Sangen, M.J. van der, Nieuwenhuijzen, G., Berbee, M., Verheij, M., Wijnhoven, B., Beerepoot, L.V., Mohammad, N.H., Mook, S., Ruurda, J.P., Kolodziejczyk, P., Polkowski, W.P., Wyrwicz, L., Alsina, M., Pera, M., Kanonnikoff, T.F., Cervantes, A., Nilsson, M., Monig, S., Wagner, A.D., Guckenberger, M., Griffiths, E.A., Smyth, E., Hanna, G.B., Markar, S., Chaudry, M.A., Hawkins, M.A., Cheong, E., Rütten, H., Gootjes, E.C., Hillegersberg, R. van, and Rossum, P.S.N. van

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Local treatment improves the outcomes for oligometastatic disease (OMD, i.e. an intermediate state between locoregional and widespread disseminated disease). However, consensus about the definition, diagnosis and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer is lacking. The aim of this study was to develop a multidisciplinary European consensus statement on the definition, diagnosis and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer. METHODS: In total, 65 specialists in the multidisciplinary treatment for oesophagogastric cancer from 49 expert centres across 16 European countries were requested to participate in this Delphi study. The consensus finding process consisted of a starting meeting, 2 online Delphi questionnaire rounds and an online consensus meeting. Input for Delphi questionnaires consisted of (1) a systematic review on definitions of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer and (2) a discussion of real-life clinical cases by multidisciplinary teams. Experts were asked to score each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. The agreement was scored to be either absent/poor (<50%), fair (50%-75%) or consensus (≥75%). RESULTS: A total of 48 experts participated in the starting meeting, both Delphi rounds, and the consensus meeting (overall response rate: 71%). OMD was considered in patients with metastatic oesophagogastric cancer limited to 1 organ with ≤3 metastases or 1 extra-regional lymph node station (consensus). In addition, OMD was considered in patients without progression at restaging after systemic therapy (consensus). For patients with synchronous or metachronous OMD with a disease-free interval ≤2 years, systemic therapy followed by restaging to consider local treatment was considered as treatment (consensus). For metachronous OMD with a disease-free interval >2 years, either upfront local treatment or systemic treatment followed by restaging was considered as treatment (fair agreement). CONCLUSION: The OMEC project has resul

Published
2023

10. A national survey on the current status of minimally invasive gastric practice on behalf of GIRCG

Author

Milone, M, D'Amore, A, Alfieri, S, Ambrosio, M, Andreuccetti, J, Ansaloni, L, Antonucci, A, Arganini, M, Baiocchi, G, Barone, M, Bencini, L, Bencivenga, M, Boccia, L, Boni, L, Braga, M, Cianchi, F, Cipollari, C, Contine, A, Cotsoglou, C, D'Imporzano, S, De Manzoni, G, De Pascale, S, De Ruvo, N, Degiuli, M, Donini, A, Elmore, U, Ercolani, G, Ferrari, G, Fumagalli, R, Garulli, G, Gelmini, R, Graziosi, L, Gualtierotti, M, Guglielmi, A, Inama, M, Maffeis, F, Maione, F, Manigrasso, M, Marchesi, F, Marrelli, D, Massobrio, A, Moretto, G, Moukachar, A, Navarra, G, Nigri, G, Olmi, S, Palaia, R, Papis, D, Parise, P, Pedrazzani, C, Petri, R, Pignata, G, Pisano, M, Rausei, S, Reddavid, R, Rocco, G, Rosa, F, Rosati, R, Rossit, L, Rottoli, M, Roviello, F, Santi, S, Scabini, S, Scaringi, S, Solaini, L, Staderini, F, Taglietti, L, Torre, B, Ubiali, P, Uccelli, M, Uggeri, F, Vertaldi, S, Viganò, J, De Palma, G, Giacopuzzi, S, Milone, Marco, D'Amore, Anna, Alfieri, Sergio, Ambrosio, Maria Raffaella, Andreuccetti, Jacopo, Ansaloni, Luca, Antonucci, Adelmo, Arganini, Marco, Baiocchi, Gianluca, Barone, Mirko, Bencini, Lapo, Bencivenga, Maria, Boccia, Luigi, Boni, Luigi, Braga, Marco, Cianchi, Fabio, Cipollari, Chiara, Contine, Alessandro, Cotsoglou, Christian, D'Imporzano, Simone, De Manzoni, Giovanni, De Pascale, Stefano, De Ruvo, Nicola, Degiuli, Maurizio, Donini, Annibale, Elmore, Ugo, Ercolani, Giorgio, Ferrari, Giovanni, Fumagalli, Romario Uberto, Garulli, Gianluca, Gelmini, Roberta, Graziosi, Luigina, Gualtierotti, Monica, Guglielmi, Alfredo, Inama, Marco, Maffeis, Federica, Maione, Francesco, Manigrasso, Michele, Marchesi, Federico, Marrelli, Daniele, Massobrio, Andrea, Moretto, Gianluigi, Moukachar, Aballah, Navarra, Giuseppe, Nigri, Giuseppe, Olmi, Stefano, Palaia, Raffaele, Papis, Davide, Parise, Paolo, Pedrazzani, Corrado, Petri, Roberto, Pignata, Giusto, Pisano, Michele, Rausei, Stefano, Reddavid, Rossella, Rocco, Giuseppe, Rosa, Fausto, Rosati, Riccardo, Rossit, Luca, Rottoli, Matteo, Roviello, Franco, Santi, Stefano, Scabini, Stefano, Scaringi, Stefano, Solaini, Leonardo, Staderini, Fabio, Taglietti, Lucio, Torre, Beatrice, Ubiali, Paolo, Uccelli, Matteo, Uggeri, Fabio, Vertaldi, Sara, Viganò, Jacopo, De Palma, Giovanni Domenico, Giacopuzzi, Simone, Milone, M, D'Amore, A, Alfieri, S, Ambrosio, M, Andreuccetti, J, Ansaloni, L, Antonucci, A, Arganini, M, Baiocchi, G, Barone, M, Bencini, L, Bencivenga, M, Boccia, L, Boni, L, Braga, M, Cianchi, F, Cipollari, C, Contine, A, Cotsoglou, C, D'Imporzano, S, De Manzoni, G, De Pascale, S, De Ruvo, N, Degiuli, M, Donini, A, Elmore, U, Ercolani, G, Ferrari, G, Fumagalli, R, Garulli, G, Gelmini, R, Graziosi, L, Gualtierotti, M, Guglielmi, A, Inama, M, Maffeis, F, Maione, F, Manigrasso, M, Marchesi, F, Marrelli, D, Massobrio, A, Moretto, G, Moukachar, A, Navarra, G, Nigri, G, Olmi, S, Palaia, R, Papis, D, Parise, P, Pedrazzani, C, Petri, R, Pignata, G, Pisano, M, Rausei, S, Reddavid, R, Rocco, G, Rosa, F, Rosati, R, Rossit, L, Rottoli, M, Roviello, F, Santi, S, Scabini, S, Scaringi, S, Solaini, L, Staderini, F, Taglietti, L, Torre, B, Ubiali, P, Uccelli, M, Uggeri, F, Vertaldi, S, Viganò, J, De Palma, G, Giacopuzzi, S, Milone, Marco, D'Amore, Anna, Alfieri, Sergio, Ambrosio, Maria Raffaella, Andreuccetti, Jacopo, Ansaloni, Luca, Antonucci, Adelmo, Arganini, Marco, Baiocchi, Gianluca, Barone, Mirko, Bencini, Lapo, Bencivenga, Maria, Boccia, Luigi, Boni, Luigi, Braga, Marco, Cianchi, Fabio, Cipollari, Chiara, Contine, Alessandro, Cotsoglou, Christian, D'Imporzano, Simone, De Manzoni, Giovanni, De Pascale, Stefano, De Ruvo, Nicola, Degiuli, Maurizio, Donini, Annibale, Elmore, Ugo, Ercolani, Giorgio, Ferrari, Giovanni, Fumagalli, Romario Uberto, Garulli, Gianluca, Gelmini, Roberta, Graziosi, Luigina, Gualtierotti, Monica, Guglielmi, Alfredo, Inama, Marco, Maffeis, Federica, Maione, Francesco, Manigrasso, Michele, Marchesi, Federico, Marrelli, Daniele, Massobrio, Andrea, Moretto, Gianluigi, Moukachar, Aballah, Navarra, Giuseppe, Nigri, Giuseppe, Olmi, Stefano, Palaia, Raffaele, Papis, Davide, Parise, Paolo, Pedrazzani, Corrado, Petri, Roberto, Pignata, Giusto, Pisano, Michele, Rausei, Stefano, Reddavid, Rossella, Rocco, Giuseppe, Rosa, Fausto, Rosati, Riccardo, Rossit, Luca, Rottoli, Matteo, Roviello, Franco, Santi, Stefano, Scabini, Stefano, Scaringi, Stefano, Solaini, Leonardo, Staderini, Fabio, Taglietti, Lucio, Torre, Beatrice, Ubiali, Paolo, Uccelli, Matteo, Uggeri, Fabio, Vertaldi, Sara, Viganò, Jacopo, De Palma, Giovanni Domenico, and Giacopuzzi, Simone

Abstract

Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG), during the 2013 annual Consensus Conference to gastric cancer, stated that laparoscopic or robotic approach should be limited only to early gastric cancer (EGC) and no further guidelines were currently available. However, accumulated evidences, mainly from eastern experiences, have supported the application of minimally invasive surgery also for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aim of our study is to give a snapshot of current surgical propensity of expert Italian upper gastrointestinal surgeons in performing minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of gastric cancer in order to answer to the question if clinical practice overcome the recommendation. Experts in the field among the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) were invited to join a web 30-item survey through a formal e-mail from January 1st, 2020, to June 31st, 2020. Responses were collected from 46 participants out of 100 upper gastrointestinal surgeons. Percentage of surgeons choosing a minimally invasive approach to treat early and advanced gastric cancer was similar. Additionally analyzing data from the centers involved, we obtained that the percentage of minimally invasive total and partial gastrectomies in advanced cases augmented with the increase of surgical procedures performed per year (p=0.02 and p=0.04 respectively). It is reasonable to assume that there is a widening of indications given by the current national guideline into clinical practice. Propensity of expert Italian upper gastrointestinal surgeons was to perform minimally invasive surgery not only for early but also for advanced gastric cancer. Of interest volume activity correlated with the propensity of surgeons to select a minimally invasive approach.

Published
2023

13. Definitions and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer according to multidisciplinary tumour boards in Europe

Author

Kroese, T.E., Hillegersberg, R. van, Schoppmann, S., Deseyne, P., Nafteux, P., Obermannova, R., Nordsmark, M., Pfeiffer, P., Hawkins, M.A., Smyth, E., Markar, S., Hanna, G.B., Cheong, E., Chaudry, A., Elme, A., Adenis, A., Piessen, G., Gani, C., Bruns, C.J., Moehler, M., Liakakos, T., Reynolds, J., Morganti, A., Rosati, R., Castoro, C., D'Ugo, D., Roviello, F., Bencivenga, M., Manzoni, G. de, Jeene, P., Sandick, J.W. van, Muijs, C., Slingerland, M., Nieuwenhuijzen, G., Wijnhoven, B., Beerepoot, L.V., Kolodziejczyk, P., Polkowski, W.P., Alsina, M., Pera, M., Kanonnikoff, T.F., Nilsson, M., Guckenberger, M., Monig, S., Wagner, D., Wyrwicz, L., Berbee, M., Gockel, I., Lordick, F., Griffiths, E.A., Rütten, H., Rosman, C., Verheij, M., Rossum, P.S.N. van, Laarhoven, H.W. van, Kroese, T.E., Hillegersberg, R. van, Schoppmann, S., Deseyne, P., Nafteux, P., Obermannova, R., Nordsmark, M., Pfeiffer, P., Hawkins, M.A., Smyth, E., Markar, S., Hanna, G.B., Cheong, E., Chaudry, A., Elme, A., Adenis, A., Piessen, G., Gani, C., Bruns, C.J., Moehler, M., Liakakos, T., Reynolds, J., Morganti, A., Rosati, R., Castoro, C., D'Ugo, D., Roviello, F., Bencivenga, M., Manzoni, G. de, Jeene, P., Sandick, J.W. van, Muijs, C., Slingerland, M., Nieuwenhuijzen, G., Wijnhoven, B., Beerepoot, L.V., Kolodziejczyk, P., Polkowski, W.P., Alsina, M., Pera, M., Kanonnikoff, T.F., Nilsson, M., Guckenberger, M., Monig, S., Wagner, D., Wyrwicz, L., Berbee, M., Gockel, I., Lordick, F., Griffiths, E.A., Rütten, H., Rosman, C., Verheij, M., Rossum, P.S.N. van, and Laarhoven, H.W. van

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Consensus about the definition and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the definition and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer across multidisciplinary tumour boards (MDTs) in Europe. MATERIAL AND METHODS: European expert centers (n = 49) were requested to discuss 15 real-life cases in their MDT with at least a medical, surgical, and radiation oncologist present. The cases varied in terms of location and number of metastases, histology, timing of detection (i.e. synchronous versus metachronous), primary tumour treatment status, and response to systemic therapy. The primary outcome was the agreement in the definition of oligometastatic disease at diagnosis and after systemic therapy. The secondary outcome was the agreement in treatment strategies. Treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease were categorised into upfront local treatment (i.e. metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy), systemic therapy followed by restaging to consider local treatment or systemic therapy alone. The agreement across MDTs was scored to be either absent/poor (<50%), fair (50%-75%), or consensus (≥75%). RESULTS: A total of 47 MDTs across 16 countries fully discussed the cases (96%). Oligometastatic disease was considered in patients with 1-2 metastases in either the liver, lung, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, adrenal gland, soft tissue or bone (consensus). At follow-up, oligometastatic disease was considered after a median of 18 weeks of systemic therapy when no progression or progression in size only of the oligometastatic lesion(s) was seen (consensus). If at restaging after a median of 18 weeks of systemic therapy the number of lesions progressed, this was not considered as oligometastatic disease (fair agreement). There was no consensus on treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease. CONCLUSION: A broad consensus on definitions of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer was found among MDTs of oeso

Published
2022

14. Open versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of survival in a western population-on behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer

Author

Lombardi, P. M., Bernasconi, D., Baiocchi, G. L., Berselli, M., Biondi, Alberto, Castoro, C., Catarci, Marco, Degiuli, M., Fumagalli Romario, U., Giacopuzzi, S., Marchesi, F., Marrelli, D., Mazzola, M., Molfino, S., Olmi, S., Rausei, S., Rosa, Fausto, Rosati, R., Roviello, F., Santi, Samuele, Solaini, L., Staderini, F., Vigano, J., Ferrari, G., Agnes, Annamaria, Alfieri, Sergio, Alloggio, M., Bencivenga, M., Benedetti, M., Bottari, A., Cianchi, F., Cocozza, E., Dalmonte, G., De Martini, P., De Pascale, S., Desio, M., Emiliani, G., Ercolani, G., Galli, F., Garosio, I., Giani, A., Gualtierotti, M., Marano, L., Morgagni, P., Peri, A., Puccetti, F., Reddavid, R., Uccelli, M., Biondi A. (ORCID:0000-0002-2470-7858), Catarci M., Rosa F. (ORCID:0000-0002-7280-8354), Santi S., Agnes A., Alfieri S. (ORCID:0000-0002-0404-724X), Lombardi, P. M., Bernasconi, D., Baiocchi, G. L., Berselli, M., Biondi, Alberto, Castoro, C., Catarci, Marco, Degiuli, M., Fumagalli Romario, U., Giacopuzzi, S., Marchesi, F., Marrelli, D., Mazzola, M., Molfino, S., Olmi, S., Rausei, S., Rosa, Fausto, Rosati, R., Roviello, F., Santi, Samuele, Solaini, L., Staderini, F., Vigano, J., Ferrari, G., Agnes, Annamaria, Alfieri, Sergio, Alloggio, M., Bencivenga, M., Benedetti, M., Bottari, A., Cianchi, F., Cocozza, E., Dalmonte, G., De Martini, P., De Pascale, S., Desio, M., Emiliani, G., Ercolani, G., Galli, F., Garosio, I., Giani, A., Gualtierotti, M., Marano, L., Morgagni, P., Peri, A., Puccetti, F., Reddavid, R., Uccelli, M., Biondi A. (ORCID:0000-0002-2470-7858), Catarci M., Rosa F. (ORCID:0000-0002-7280-8354), Santi S., Agnes A., and Alfieri S. (ORCID:0000-0002-0404-724X)

Abstract

Background Oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in the West have been poorly investigated. The aim of the present study was to compare survival outcomes in patients undergoing curative-intent laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in several centres belonging to the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer. Methods Data of patients operated between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Propensity Score Matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics of patients undergoing laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival. Secondary endpoints were 3-year disease-free survival and short-term outcomes. Multivariable regression analyses for survival were conducted. Results Data were retrieved from 20 centres. Of the 717 patients included, 438 patients were correctly matched, 219 per group. The 3-year overall survival was 73.6% and 68.7% in the laparoscopic and open group, respectively (p = 0.40). When compared with open gastrectomy, laparoscopic gastrectomy showed comparable 3-year disease-free survival (62.8%, vs 58.9%, p = 0.40), higher rate of return to intended oncologic treatment (56.9% vs 40.2%, p = 0.001), similar 30-day morbidity/mortality. Prognostic factors for survival were ASA Score >= 3, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index >= 5, lymph node ratio >= 0.15, p/ypTNM Stage III and return to intended oncologic treatment. Conclusions Laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer offers similar rates of survival when compared to open gastrectomy, with higher rates of return to intended oncologic treatment. ASA score, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, lymph node ratio, return to intended oncologic treatment and p/ypTNM Stage, but not surgical approach, are prognostic factors for survival.

Published
2022

15. Consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer in referral centers in Italy

Author

Solaini, L., Bencivenga, M., Rosa, Fausto, D'Ignazio, A., Marino, E., Ministrini, S., Sofia, S., Sacco, M., Mura, G., Rausa, E., Prizio, M. D., Graziosi, L., Degiuli, M., Tiberio, G. A. M., Alfieri, Sergio, Marrelli, D., Morgagni, P., Ercolani, G., Rosa F. (ORCID:0000-0002-7280-8354), Alfieri S. (ORCID:0000-0002-0404-724X), Solaini, L., Bencivenga, M., Rosa, Fausto, D'Ignazio, A., Marino, E., Ministrini, S., Sofia, S., Sacco, M., Mura, G., Rausa, E., Prizio, M. D., Graziosi, L., Degiuli, M., Tiberio, G. A. M., Alfieri, Sergio, Marrelli, D., Morgagni, P., Ercolani, G., Rosa F. (ORCID:0000-0002-7280-8354), and Alfieri S. (ORCID:0000-0002-0404-724X)

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus pandemic had a major impact in Italy. The Italian health system’s re-organization to face the emergency may have led to significant consequences especially in the diagnosis and treatment of malignancies. This study aimed to assess the impact of the pandemic in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer in nine Gruppo Italiano RIcerca Cancro Gastrico (GIRCG) centers. Methods: All patients assessed for gastric adenocarcinoma at nine GIRCG centers between January 2019 and November 2020 were included. Patients were grouped according to the date of “patient 1’s” diagnosis in Italy: preCOVID versus COVID. Clinico-pathological and outcome differences between the two groups were analyzed. Results: A total of 632 patients were included in the analysis (205 in the COVID group). The cT4 weighted ratios were higher in 2020 from April to September, with the greatest differences in May, August and September. The cM+ weighted ratio was significantly higher in July 2020. The mean number of gastrectomies had the greatest reduction in March and May 2020 compared with 2019. The median times from diagnosis to chemotherapy, to complete diagnostic work-up or to operation were longer in 2019. The median time from the end of chemotherapy to surgery was 17 days longer in the preCOVID group. Conclusions: A greater number of advanced or metastatic cases were diagnosed after the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially after the “full lockdown” periods. During the pandemic, once gastric cancer patients were referred to one of the centers, a shorter time to complete the diagnostic work-up or to address them to the best treatment option was required.

Published
2022

17. 62: WHICH GASTRIC CANCER PATIENTS COULD BENEFIT FROM STAGING LAPAROSCOPY? A GIRCG MULTICENTER COHORT STUDY

Author

Solaini, L, primary, Bencivenga, M, additional, D’Ignazio, A, additional, Milone, M, additional, Marino, E, additional, De Pascale, S, additional, Rosa, F, additional, Sacco, M, additional, Fumagalli Romario, U, additional, Graziosi, L, additional, De Palma, G, additional, Marrelli, D, additional, Morgagni, P, additional, and Ercolani, G, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

20. Definitions and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer according to multidisciplinary tumour boards in Europe

Author

Kroese, T.E. van Hillegersberg, R. Schoppmann, S. Deseyne, P.R.A.J. Nafteux, P. Obermannova, R. Nordsmark, M. Pfeiffer, P. Hawkings, M.A. Smyth, E. Markar, S. Hanna, G.B. Cheong, E. Chaudry, A. Elme, A. Adenis, A. Piessen, G. Gani, C. Bruns, C.J. Moehler, M. Liakakos, T. Reynolds, J. Morganti, A. Rosati, R. Castoro, C. D'Ugo, D. Roviello, F. Bencivenga, M. de Manzoni, G. Jeene, P. van Sandick, J.W. Muijs, C. Slingerland, M. Nieuwenhuijzen, G. Wijnhoven, B. Beerepoot, L.V. Kolodziejczyk, P. Polkowski, W.P. Alsina, M. Pera, M. Kanonnikoff, T.F. Nilsson, M. Guckenberger, M. Monig, S. Wagner, D. Wyrwicz, L. Berbee, M. Gockel, I. Lordick, F. Griffiths, E.A. Verheij, M. van Rossum, P.S.N. van Laarhoven, H.W.M. Rosman, C. Rütten, H. Gootjes, E.C. Vonken, F.E.M. van Dieren, J.M. Vollebergh, M.A. van der Sangen, M. Creemers, G.-J. Zander, T. Schlößer, H. Cascinu, S. Mazza, E. Nicoletti, R. Damascelli, A. Slim, N. Passoni, P. Cossu, A. Puccetti, F. Barbieri, L. Fanti, L. Azzolini, F. Ventoruzzo, F. Szczepanik, A. Visa, L. Reig, A. Roques, T. Harrison, M. Ciseł, B. Pikuła, A. Skórzewska, M. Vanommeslaeghe, H. Van Daele, E. Pattyn, P. Geboes, K. Callebout, E. Ribeiro, S. van Duijvendijk, P. Tromp, C. Sosef, M. Warmerdam, F. Heisterkamp, J. Vera, A. Jordá, E. López-Mozos, F. Fernandez-Moreno, M.C. Barrios-Carvajal, M. Huerta, M. de Steur, W. Lips, I. Diez, M. Castro, S. O'Neill, R. Holyoake, D. Hacker, U. Denecke, T. Kuhnt, T. Hoffmeister, A. Kluge, R. Bostel, T. Grimminger, P. Jedlička, V. Křístek, J. Pospíšil, P. Mourregot, A. Maurin, C. Starling, N. Chong, I. OMEC working group

Abstract

Background: Consensus about the definition and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer is lacking. Objective: To assess the definition and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer across multidisciplinary tumour boards (MDTs) in Europe. Material and methods: European expert centers (n = 49) were requested to discuss 15 real-life cases in their MDT with at least a medical, surgical, and radiation oncologist present. The cases varied in terms of location and number of metastases, histology, timing of detection (i.e. synchronous versus metachronous), primary tumour treatment status, and response to systemic therapy. The primary outcome was the agreement in the definition of oligometastatic disease at diagnosis and after systemic therapy. The secondary outcome was the agreement in treatment strategies. Treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease were categorised into upfront local treatment (i.e. metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy), systemic therapy followed by restaging to consider local treatment or systemic therapy alone. The agreement across MDTs was scored to be either absent/poor (

Published
2022

21. Gastrobronchial Fistula After Re-Sleeve Gastrectomy: Case Report and Review of Literature

Author

Zigiotto D, Matteo Zenzaro, Bencivenga M, and Simone Giacopuzzi

Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty, Sleeve gastrectomy, business.industry, Fistula, medicine.medical_treatment, 030209 endocrinology & metabolism, medicine.disease, Surgery, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Parenteral nutrition, Main Bronchus, Swallowing, medicine, 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology, Gastrectomy, Abscess, Complication, business
Abstract

Introduction: Gastro-bronchial fistula (GBF) is a rare and challenging complication of sleeve gastrectomy as it is the result of a chronic gastric leak and subsequent long-standing sub-phrenic abscess. In this article we report the first case of GBF after a re-sleeve gastrectomy. Case Presentation: a 42-years-old patient was admitted to our Unit because of the arise of sepsis, hypothension and cough with expectoration of enteral nutrition. The patient had a history of sleeve (2010) and re-sleeve gastrectomy (2017) for weight regain. On admission radiological signs of consolidation of the left pulmonary lobe and, after the swallowing of oral contrast, a little backward trans-diaphragmatic opacification of the main bronchus was described. An open total gastrectomy with a trans-abdominal atypical lower pulmonary lobe resection were performed. A post-operative ERAS protocol was adopted, and the patient was discharged in POD 9 in good conditions, after an uneventful recovery and feeding per os. Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the first case of a GBF after a re-sleeve gastrectomy, more evidences are needed before routinely advice a re-sleeve gastrectomy after a failed sleeve gastrectomy. Indeed, given that in revisional bariatric surgery the risk of gastric leak may be higher due to a greater tension applied on the staple line, the incidence of rare but serious complications such GBF may consequently increase.

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

24. Surgery for stage iv gastric cancer: An Italian perspective

Author

Ministrini, S., primary, Bencivenga, M., additional, Molteni, B., additional, Marino, E., additional, D''Ignazio, A., additional, Solaini, L., additional, Mura, G., additional, Alfano, M.S., additional, Sofia, S., additional, Cipollari, C., additional, Garosio, I., additional, Vannoni, M.C., additional, Polom, K., additional, Degiuli, M., additional, Morgagni, P., additional, Marrelli, D., additional, Roviello, F., additional, Donini, A., additional, De Manzoni, G., additional, and Tiberio, G.A.M., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

25. Mucin expression in gastric- and gastro-oesophageal signet-ring cell cancer: results from a comprehensive literature review and a large cohort study of Caucasian and Asian gastric cancer

Author

Kerckhoffs, K.G.P., Liu, D.H.W., Saragoni, L., Post, R.S. van der, Langer, R., Bencivenga, M., Iglesias, M., Gallo, G., Hewitt, L.C., Fazzi, G.E., Vos, A.M., Renaud, F., Yoshikawa, T., Oshima, T., Tomezzoli, A., Manzoni, G. de, Arai, T., Kushima, R., Carneiro, F., Grabsch, H.I., Kerckhoffs, K.G.P., Liu, D.H.W., Saragoni, L., Post, R.S. van der, Langer, R., Bencivenga, M., Iglesias, M., Gallo, G., Hewitt, L.C., Fazzi, G.E., Vos, A.M., Renaud, F., Yoshikawa, T., Oshima, T., Tomezzoli, A., Manzoni, G. de, Arai, T., Kushima, R., Carneiro, F., and Grabsch, H.I.

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 225982.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), BACKGROUND: The literature on the prognostic relevance of signet-ring cell (SRC) histology in gastric cancer (GC) is controversial which is most likely related to inconsistent SRC classification based on haematoxylin-eosin staining. We hypothesised that mucin stains can consistently identify SRC-GC and predict GC patient outcome. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review on mucin stains in SRC-GC and characterised the mucin expression in 851 Caucasian GC and 410 Asian GC using Alcian Blue (AB)-Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS), MUC2 (intestinal-type mucin), and MUC5AC (gastric-type mucin). The relationship between mucin expression and histological phenotype [poorly cohesive (PC) including proportion of SRCs, non-poorly cohesive (non-PC), or mucinous (MC)], clinicopathological variables, and patient outcome was analysed. RESULTS: Depending on mucin expression and cut-offs, the positivity rates of SRC-GC reported in the literature varied from 6 to 100%. Patients with MUC2 positive SRC-GC or SRC-GC with (gastro)intestinal phenotype had poorest outcome. In our cohort study, PC with ≥ 10% SRCs expressed more frequently MUC2, MUC5AC, and ABPAS (p < 0.001, p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). Caucasians with AB positive GC or combined ABPAS-MUC2 positive and MUC5AC negative had poorest outcome (all p = 0.002). This association was not seen in Asian patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to suggest that mucin stains do not help to differentiate between SRC-GC and non-SRC-GC. However, mucin stains appear to be able to identify GC patients with different outcome. To our surprise, the relationship between outcome and mucin expression seems to differ between Caucasian and Asian GC patients which warrants further investigations.

Published
2020

26. Risk factors for esophago-jejunal anastomosis leakage after total gastrectomy for cancer. A multicenter retrospective study of the Italian research group for gastric cancer

Author

Trapani, R., Rausei, S., Reddavid, R., Degiuli, M., Bencivenga, M., Dal Cero, M., Rosa, Fausto, Alfieri, S., Tiberio, G. A., Alfano, M. S., Gualtierotti, M., Ferrari, G., Persiani, Roberto, Biondi, Alberto, Donini, A., Graziosi, L., Sasia, D., Geretto, P., Vigano, J., Cicuttin, E., Galli, Flavia, Strignano, P., Mazza, E., Taddei, A., Bartolini, I., Taglietti, L., Ruggiero, Sara, Treppiedi, E., Postiglione, V., Casella, F., Sansonetti, A., Abatini, Carlo, Attalla El Halabieh, Miriam, Millo, P., Usai, Alessandro, Mineccia, M., Ferrero, A., Rosa F. (ORCID:0000-0002-7280-8354), Persiani R. (ORCID:0000-0002-1537-5097), Biondi A. (ORCID:0000-0002-2470-7858), Galli F., Ruggiero S., Abatini C., Attalla EL Halabieh M., Usai A., Trapani, R., Rausei, S., Reddavid, R., Degiuli, M., Bencivenga, M., Dal Cero, M., Rosa, Fausto, Alfieri, S., Tiberio, G. A., Alfano, M. S., Gualtierotti, M., Ferrari, G., Persiani, Roberto, Biondi, Alberto, Donini, A., Graziosi, L., Sasia, D., Geretto, P., Vigano, J., Cicuttin, E., Galli, Flavia, Strignano, P., Mazza, E., Taddei, A., Bartolini, I., Taglietti, L., Ruggiero, Sara, Treppiedi, E., Postiglione, V., Casella, F., Sansonetti, A., Abatini, Carlo, Attalla El Halabieh, Miriam, Millo, P., Usai, Alessandro, Mineccia, M., Ferrero, A., Rosa F. (ORCID:0000-0002-7280-8354), Persiani R. (ORCID:0000-0002-1537-5097), Biondi A. (ORCID:0000-0002-2470-7858), Galli F., Ruggiero S., Abatini C., Attalla EL Halabieh M., and Usai A.

Abstract

Background: Many Eastern reports attempted to identify predictive variables for esophago-jejunal anastomosis leakage (EJAL) after total gastrectomy for cancer. There are no definitive answers about reliable risk factors for EJAL. This retrospective study shows the largest Western series focused on this topic. Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective study analyzing patients’ datasets collected by 18 Italian referral Centres of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) from 2000 to 2018. The inclusion criteria were pathological diagnosis of gastric and esophageal (Siewert III) carcinoma requiring total gastrectomy. The primary end point of risk analysis was the occurrence of EJAL; secondary end points were post-operative (30-day) morbidity and mortality, length of stay (LoS), and survival. Results: Data of 1750 patients submitted to total gastrectomy were collected. EJAL developed in 116 (6.6%) patients and represented the 26.3% of all the 441 observed post-operative surgical complications. EJAL diagnosis was followed by a reoperation in 39 (33.6%) patients and by an endoscopic/radiological procedure in 30 cases (25.9%). In 47 patients (40.5%) EJAL was managed with conservative approach. Post-operative LoS and mortality were significantly higher after EJAL occurrence (27 days versus 12 days and 8.6% versus 1.6%, respectively). At risk analysis, comorbidities (particularly, if respiratory), minimally invasive surgery, extended lymphadenectomy, and anastomotic technique resulted significant predictive factors for EJAL. EJAL did not significantly affect survival. Conclusions: These results were consistent with Asian experiences: the frequency of EJAL and its higher rate observed in patients with comorbidities or after minimally invasive approach were confirmed.

Published
2020

28. Surgery for stage IV gastric cancer: an Italian perspective

Author

Ministrini, S., primary, Bencivenga, M., additional, Marino, E., additional, D'Ignazio, A., additional, Solaini, L., additional, Mura, G., additional, Sofia, S., additional, Molteni, B., additional, Alfano, M.S., additional, Cipollari, C., additional, Vannoni, M.C., additional, Polom, K., additional, Degiuli, M., additional, Morgagni, P., additional, Marrelli, D., additional, Roviello, F., additional, Donini, A., additional, De Manzoni, G., additional, and Tiberio, G.A.M., additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

29. Clinicopathological features and time trends of three subtypes of gastric cancer: Upper intestinal, lower intestinal and diffuse. Analysis of the GIRCG database on 5606 patients

Author

De Franco, L., primary, Marrelli, D., additional, Morgagni, P., additional, Degiuli, M., additional, Giacopuzzi, S., additional, Orsenigo, E., additional, Pacelli, F., additional, Fumagalli, U., additional, Baiocchi, G., additional, Del Rio, P., additional, Catarci, M., additional, Marchet, A., additional, Mura, G., additional, Bencivenga, M., additional, Rosa, F., additional, Saragoni, L., additional, Quagliuolo, V., additional, and Roviello, F., additional

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

32. I FUNGHI IPOGEI RACCOLTI INSIEME A TUBER AESTIVUM

Author

Paci F., Bencivenga M., ZAMBONELLI, ALESSANDRA, DONNINI D., BACIARELLI FALINI L., BENCIVENGA M., DI MASSIMO G., Paci F., Zambonelli A., and Bencivenga M.

Abstract

Lo studio è stato condotto nell’anno 2008, presso l’Azienda Urbani Tartufi s.r.l (Santa Anatolia di Narco, Perugia), in occasione dello stage previsto dal Master in Micologia Agroalimentare organizzato dall’Università degli Studi di Bologna.

Published
2010

36. I tartufi e la tartuficoltura in Sicilia. Attualità e prospettive

Author

VENTURELLA, Giuseppe, GARGANO, Maria Letizia, MANDRACCHIA, Gerlando, SAITTA, Alessandro, Bencivenga, M, Illice, M, Morara, M, Pecorella, E, Zambonelli, A., Venturella, G, Bencivenga, M, Gargano, ML, Illice, M, Mandracchia, G, Morara, M, Pecorella, E, Saitta, A, and Zambonelli, A

Subjects
Tartufi, Tartuficoltura, Sicilia, Settore BIO/02 - Botanica Sistematica, Settore BIO/03 - Botanica Ambientale E Applicata
Published
2009

37. I tartufi e la tartuficoltura in Sicilia. Attualità e prospettive

Author

Vinturella G., Bencivenga M., Gargano M. L., Illice M., Mandracchia G., Morara M., Pecorella E., Saitta A., ZAMBONELLI, ALESSANDRA, Vinturella G., Bencivenga M., Gargano M.L., Illice M., Mandracchia G., Morara M., Pecorella E., Saitta A., and Zambonelli A.

Abstract

Sono riportati i risultati del progetto"Sviluppo della tartuficoltura in Sicilia"

Published
2009

39. Extended lymphadenectomy in elderly and/or highly co-morbid gastric cancer patients: A retrospective multicenter study

Author

Rausei, Stefano, Ruspi, L., Rosa, Fausto, Morgagni, P., Marrelli, D., Cossu, A., Cananzi, Ferdinando Carlo Maria, Lomonaco, R., Coniglio, A., Biondi, Alberto, Cipollari, C., Graziosi, L., Fumagalli, U., Casella, F., Bertoli, P., di Leo, A., Alfieri, Sergio, Vittimberga, G., Roviello, F., Orsenigo, E., Quagliuolo, V., Montemurro, S., Baiocchi, G., Persiani, Roberto, Bencivenga, M., Donini, A., Rosati, R., Sansonetti, A., Ansaloni, L., Zanoni, A., Galli, F., Dionigi, G., Rosa, Fausto (ORCID:0000-0002-7280-8354), Biondi, Alberto (ORCID:0000-0002-2470-7858), Alfieri, Sergio (ORCID:0000-0002-0404-724X), Persiani, Roberto (ORCID:0000-0002-1537-5097), Rausei, Stefano, Ruspi, L., Rosa, Fausto, Morgagni, P., Marrelli, D., Cossu, A., Cananzi, Ferdinando Carlo Maria, Lomonaco, R., Coniglio, A., Biondi, Alberto, Cipollari, C., Graziosi, L., Fumagalli, U., Casella, F., Bertoli, P., di Leo, A., Alfieri, Sergio, Vittimberga, G., Roviello, F., Orsenigo, E., Quagliuolo, V., Montemurro, S., Baiocchi, G., Persiani, Roberto, Bencivenga, M., Donini, A., Rosati, R., Sansonetti, A., Ansaloni, L., Zanoni, A., Galli, F., Dionigi, G., Rosa, Fausto (ORCID:0000-0002-7280-8354), Biondi, Alberto (ORCID:0000-0002-2470-7858), Alfieri, Sergio (ORCID:0000-0002-0404-724X), and Persiani, Roberto (ORCID:0000-0002-1537-5097)

Abstract

Background Gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy is considered the gold standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer, with no age- or comorbidity-related limitations. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of curative gastrectomy with extended nodal dissection, verifying survival in elderly and highly co-morbid patients. Methods In a retrospective multicenter study, we examined 1322 non-metastatic gastric-cancer patients that underwent curative gastrectomy with D2 versus D1 lymphadenectomy from January 2000 to December 2009. Postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) according to age and the Charlson Comorbidity Score were analyzed in relation to the extent of lymphadenectomy. Results Postoperative morbidity was 30.4%. Complications were more frequent in highly co-morbid elderly patients, and, although general morbidity rates after D2 and D1 lymphadenectomy were similar (29.9% and 33.2%, respectively), they increased following D2 in highly co-morbid elderly patients (39.6%). D2-lymphadenectomy significantly improved 5-year OS and DSS (48.0% vs. 37.6% in D1, p < 0.001 and 72.6% vs. 58.1% in D1, p < 0.001, respectively) in all patients. In elderly patients, this benefit was present only in 5-year DSS. D2 nodal dissection induced better 5-year OS and DSS rates in elderly patients with positive nodes (29.7% vs. 21.2% in D1, p = 0.008 and 47.5% vs. 30.6% in D1, p = 0.001, respectively), although it was present only in DSS when highly co-morbid elderly patients were considered. Conclusion Extended lymphadenectomy confirmed better survival rates in gastric cancer patients. Due to high postoperative complication rate and no significant improvement of the OS, D1 lymphadenectomy should be considered in elderly and/or highly co-morbid gastric cancer patients.

Published
2016

40. Extended lymphadenectomy in elderly and/or highly co-morbid gastric cancer patients: A retrospective multicenter study

Author

Rausei, S., primary, Ruspi, L., additional, Rosa, F., additional, Morgagni, P., additional, Marrelli, D., additional, Cossu, A., additional, Cananzi, F.C.M., additional, Lomonaco, R., additional, Coniglio, A., additional, Biondi, A., additional, Cipollari, C., additional, Graziosi, L., additional, Fumagalli, U., additional, Casella, F., additional, Bertoli, P., additional, di Leo, A., additional, Alfieri, S., additional, Vittimberga, G., additional, Roviello, F., additional, Orsenigo, E., additional, Quagliuolo, V., additional, Montemurro, S., additional, Baiocchi, G., additional, Persiani, R., additional, Bencivenga, M., additional, Donini, A., additional, Rosati, R., additional, Sansonetti, A., additional, Ansaloni, L., additional, Zanoni, A., additional, Galli, F., additional, and Dionigi, G., additional

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

43. TAK1-regulated expression of BIRC3 predicts resistance to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients

Author

Piro, G, primary, Giacopuzzi, S, additional, Bencivenga, M, additional, Carbone, C, additional, Verlato, G, additional, Frizziero, M, additional, Zanotto, M, additional, Mina, M M, additional, Merz, V, additional, Santoro, R, additional, Zanoni, A, additional, De Manzoni, G, additional, Tortora, G, additional, and Melisi, D, additional

Published
2015
Full Text
View/download PDF

48. La flora di Rio Fuggio (Vallonina - Leonessa, Rieti)

Author

ANZALONE B, ASTOLFI L, BANCHIERI C, BENCIVENGA M, BERNARDO L, BERTOLOTTO S, CAMPO I, CUTINI, Maurizio, Anzalone, B, Astolfi, L, Banchieri, C, Bencivenga, M, Bernardo, L, Bertolotto, S, Campo, I, Cutini, Maurizio, and Ii

Published
1994

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results