1. Synthesis of results for Brine Availability Test in Salt (BATS) DECOVALEX-2023 Task E
- Author
-
Kuhlman, Kristopher L, Bartol, Jeroen, Benbow, Steven J, Bourret, Michelle, Czaikowski, Oliver, Guiltinan, Eric, Jantschik, Kyra, Jayne, Richard, Norris, Simon, Rutqvist, Jonny, Shao, Hua, Stauffer, Philip H, Tounsi, Hafssa, and Watson, Claire
- Subjects
Hydrology ,Engineering ,Earth Sciences ,Salt ,Brine ,Thermal-hydrological-mechanical ,Two-phase flow ,Modeling comparison ,Benchmark ,Geology ,Civil Engineering ,Resources engineering and extractive metallurgy - Abstract
In the 2023 phase of the international collaborative DECOVALEX modeling project, Task E focused on understanding thermal, hydrological, and mechanical (THM) processes related to predicting brine migration in the excavation damaged zone around a heated excavation in salt. Salt is attractive as a disposal medium for radioactive waste because it is self-healing and is essentially impermeable and non-porous in the far field. Investigation of the short-term, near-field behavior is important for radioactive waste disposal because this early period strongly controls the amount of inflowing brine. Brine leads to corrosion of waste forms and waste packages, and possible dissolution of radionuclides with brine transport being a potential transport vector to the accessible environment.The Task was divided into steps. Step 0 included matching unheated brine inflow data from boreholes at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) and matching temperature observations during a Brine Availability Test in Salt (BATS) heater test. Step 1 included validation of models against a thermo-poroelastic analytical solution, and two-phase flow around an excavation. Finally, Step 2 required all the individual components covered in steps 0 and 1 to come together to match observed brine inflow behavior during the same BATS heater test.There were a range of approaches from the teams, from mechanistic to prescriptive. Given the uncertainties in the problem, some teams used one- or two-dimensional models of the processes, while other teams included more geometrical complexity in three-dimensional models. Task E was a learning experience for the teams involved, and feedback from the modeling teams has led to changes in follow-on BATS experiments at WIPP. The primary Task E lessons learned were the impact of hydrologic initialization methods (wetting up vs. drying down), the difference between confined and unconfined thermal expansion, and the large changes in permeability associated with heating and cooling.
- Published
- 2024