Search

Background: Ocular emergencies are commonly evaluated in general emergency departments (ED) where ophthalmologists are rarely available. Nonmydriatic ocular imaging combining color fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography (NMFP-OCT) can help with rapid remote triage by ophthalmologists. We evaluated the rate at which retinal detachments (RDs) can be diagnosed with NMFP-OCT in the ED. Methods: Quality improvement project with prospective collection of data on RD patients who had NMFP-OCT obtained by ED staff over 1 year. Photographs were interpreted remotely by ophthalmologists and all patients underwent an in-person ophthalmologic examination in the ED to confirm the presence of a RD. Results: A total of 63 eyes (58 patients) had a RD, among which 53 (84.1%) had strong suggestion of RD on ocular imaging (34 [54%] were seen on both color and OCT nerve/macula; 11 [17.5%] were seen on color but missed on OCT; 8 [12.7%] were missed on color but seen on OCT). Ten RDs (15.9%) were missed on both color and OCT because of peripheral location of the RD (4, 40%), vitreous hemorrhage (4, 40%), or poor image quality (2, 20%). A total of 40 out of 58 patients were not seen by an eye care provider prior to reaching our ED and 10 had an inappropriate stroke workup for acute vision loss of presumed vascular origin. Conclusion: NMFP-OCT of the posterior pole obtained by ED staff revealed the RD in 84.1% of eyes, allowing for rapid remote triage of patients with visual symptoms and avoiding unnecessary testing when the diagnosis of RD is confirmed.

Background: For patients with idiopathic or multiple sclerosis (MS)-associated optic neuritis (ON), the largest multicenter clinical trial (Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial [ONTT]) showed excellent visual outcomes and baseline high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA) was the only predictor of HCVA at 1 year. We aimed to evaluate predictors of long-term HCVA in a modern, real-world population of patients with ON and compare with previously published ONTT models., Methods: We performed a retrospective, longitudinal, observational study at the University of Michigan and the University of Calgary evaluating 135 episodes of idiopathic or MS-associated ON in 118 patients diagnosed by a neuro-ophthalmologist within 30 days of onset (January 2011-June 2021). Primary outcome measured was HCVA (Snellen equivalents) at 6-18 months. Multiple linear regression models of 107 episodes from 93 patients assessed the association between HCVA at 6-18 months and age, sex, race, pain, optic disc swelling, symptoms (days), viral illness prodrome, MS status, high-dose glucocorticoid treatment, and baseline HCVA., Results: Of the 135 acute episodes (109 Michigan and 26 Calgary), median age at presentation was 39 years (interquartile range [IQR], 31-49 years), 91 (67.4%) were women, 112 (83.0%) were non-Hispanic Caucasians, 101 (75.9%) had pain, 33 (24.4%) had disc edema, 8 (5.9%) had a viral prodrome, 66 (48.9%) had MS, and 62 (46.6%) were treated with glucocorticoids. The median (IQR) time between symptom onset and diagnosis was 6 days (range, 4-11 days). The median (IQR) HCVA at baseline and at 6-18 months were 20/50 (20/22, 20/200) and 20/20 (20/20, 20/27), respectively; 62 (45.9%) had better than 20/40 at baseline and 117 (86.7%) had better than 20/40 at 6-18 months. In linear regression models (n = 107 episodes in 93 patients with baseline HCVA better than CF), only baseline HCVA (β = 0.076; P = 0.027) was associated with long-term HCVA. Regression coefficients were similar and within the 95% confidence interval of coefficients from published ONTT models., Conclusions: In a modern cohort of patients with idiopathic or MS-associated ON with baseline HCVA better than CF, long-term outcomes were good, and the only predictor was baseline HCVA. These findings were similar to prior analyses of ONTT data, and as a result, these are validated for use in conveying prognostic information about long-term HCVA outcomes., Competing Interests: A. Jarocki, L. A. Gonzalez, C. A. Andrews, and K. A. Kerber: no conflicts of interest to disclose; E. Benard-Seguin : Neuro Nexus Hackathon Grant and Fighting Blindness Canada received from University of Calgary; F. Costello: consulting fees received from Accure Therapeutics and Frequency Therapeutics. Payment for lectures received from Novartis and Alexion; L. B. De Lott: funding received from K23EY027849 grant and North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society Pilot Grant. Payment for lectures received from the American Academy of Neurology., (Copyright © 2023 by North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.)

Purpose of Review: The primary aim of this review is to describe the clinical course, salient imaging features, and relevant serological profiles of common optic neuritis (ON) subtypes. Key diagnostic challenges and treatment options will also be discussed., Recent Findings: ON is a broad term that describes an inflammatory optic nerve injury arising from a variety of potential causes. ON can occur sporadically, however there is particular concern for co-associated central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory syndromes including multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optic spectrum disorders (NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody associated disease (MOGAD). The ON subtypes that often herald MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD differ with respect to serological antibody profile and neuroimaging characteristics, yet there is significant overlap in their clinical presentations. A discerning history and thorough examination are critical to rendering the correct diagnosis., Summary: Optic neuritis subtypes vary with respect to their long-term prognosis and accordingly, require different acute treatment strategies. Moreover, delays in identifying MOGAD, and certainly NMOSD, can be highly detrimental because affected individuals are vulnerable to permanent vision loss and neurologic disability from relapses., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Optic neuritis (ON), as an umbrella term, refers to a spectrum of inflammatory optic neuropathies arising from a myriad of potential causes. In its most common form, "typical" ON presents as a unilateral, painful subacute vision loss event in young Caucasian women. The Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT) has historically guided our treatment of ON, and taught us important lessons about the clinical presentation, visual prognosis, and future risk of multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis associated with this condition. However, in the decades since the ONTT, several immune-mediated conditions such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein IgG associated disease (MOGAD) have been discovered, complicating the clinical approach to ON. Unlike MS, other central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory conditions are associated with ON subtypes that are potentially blinding, and prone to recurrence. Owing to differences in the clinical presentation, serological biomarkers, radiological findings, and prognostic implications associated with MS ON, NMOSD ON, and MOGAD ON subtypes, it is imperative that clinicians be aware of the diagnostic approach and management options for these conditions., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2022 Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology.)

Objective: The incidence of giant cell arteritis (GCA) is insufficiently documented for Canada, but important to ascertain for public health planning. We estimate the incidence of biopsy-proven GCA (BPGCA) in Kingston, Ontario, and for the province of Ontario., Method: The number of cases of BPGCA was tabulated from retrospective chart review of all temporal artery biopsies (TABx) in Kingston, Ontario from 2011-15. The relevant population denominator was determined from the Canada census federal electoral district and the patient's postal code. The province-wide estimate for the incidence of BPGCA was calculated from provincial billing data of TABx from 2015-17, the Canada census for Ontario, and the expected positive yield of TABx., Results: There were 35 subjects with BPGCA in the Kingston area over the 4-year period, from a population of 179 503 individuals 50 years of age or older (≥50 years). Ontario billing data identified 2404 patients who underwent TABx for suspected GCA over a 2-year period, from a population of 5 143 610 persons ≥50 years. Meta-analysis of 5 provincial TABx series suggested a 21% positive yield from TABx procedures (95% CI 0.18-0.24). The minimum cumulative incidence of BPGCA was 4.9 per 100 000 persons ≥50 years in Kingston, and 4.9 (95% CI 4.2-5.6) per 100 000 persons ≥50 years for Ontario as a whole., Conclusion: The estimated incidence of BPGCA in Ontario using 2 different estimation techniques was comparable, but low compared with other countries. The actual incidence of GCA in Ontario may be higher., (Copyright © 2019 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine the positive yield (utility rate) of temporal artery biopsy (TAB) in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA)., Study Design: Systematic review (CRD42017078508) and meta-regression., Materials and Methods: All articles concerning TAB for suspected GCA with English language abstracts from 1998 to 2017 were retrieved. Articles were excluded if they exclusively reported positive TAB, or only cases of known GCA. Where available, the pre-specified predictors of age, sex, vision symptoms, jaw claudication, duration of steroid treatment prior to TAB, specimen length, bilateral TAB, and use of ultrasound/MRI (imaging) were recorded for meta-regression., Results: One hundred and thirteen articles met eligibility criteria. The I 2 was 92%, and with such high heterogeneity, meta-analysis is unsuitable. The median yield of TAB was 0.25 (95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.27), with interquartile range 0.17 to 0.34. On univariate meta-regression age (coefficient 0.012, p  = 0.025) was the only statistically significant patient factor associated with TAB yield., Conclusions: Systematic review revealed high heterogeneity in the yield of TAB. The median utility rate of 25% and its interquartile range provides a benchmark for decisions regarding the under/overutilization of TAB and aids in the evaluation of non-invasive alternatives for the investigation of GCA.