Search

This study critically examines the public's perception of Florence Nightingale's legacy through a critical discourse analysis (CDA) of digital media, specifically podcasts and YouTube. Nightingale, who is often remembered as "The Lady with the Lamp", holds a complex identity within modern narratives that is celebrated for her pioneering contributions to nursing and public health, even if there are some disagreements about her, given the colonialist setting that may have shaped some of her opinions and decisions. This research employed CDA to analyze 25 podcasts and 18 YouTube videos, which were systematically included according to a priori inclusion criteria. The study synthesized how these media products portray Nightingale and, by extension, shape public discourse about the nursing profession. The findings reveal five thematic representations of Nightingale: as a legendary figure, a modern feminist, a dedicated statistician, a pioneer in public health, and a pivotal STEM contributor. These portrayals challenge traditional nursing stereotypes by emphasizing Nightingale's role as a rigorous scientist and reformer, suggesting broader perceptions of nurses that encompass leadership, analytical skills, and strategic thinking. The study supports the hypothesis that digital narratives significantly influence the public's understanding and appreciation of nursing, advocating for a more nuanced professional identity that integrates traditional caregiving roles with critical and analytical capabilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study focused on vaccine hesitancy and decision regret about the COVID-19 vaccine among nursing students (BScN and MScN) and Registered Nurses (RNs) in Italy. The primary aim was to describe decision regret and vaccine hesitancy among these groups and to understand what influences vaccine hesitancy. Data were collected through an e-survey conducted from March to June 2024. The Decision Regret Scale and the Adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale were employed to assess regret and hesitancy levels, assessing trust, concerns, and compliance regarding vaccination. Among the participants, 8.64% were not vaccinated. The results indicated moderate to high levels of decision regret and diverse levels of trust, concerns, and compliance with COVID-19 vaccination. Structural equation modeling revealed that decision regret significantly predicted Trust (R2 = 31.3%) and Concerns (R2 = 26.9%), with lower regret associated with higher trust and lower concerns about vaccine safety. The number of COVID-19 vaccine boosters was a significant predictor of Trust and Concerns, with more boosters associated with higher trust and lower concerns. MScN students exhibited higher Compliance compared to RNs (R2 = 2.9%), highlighting the role of advanced education. These findings suggest that addressing decision regret and providing comprehensive vaccine information could enhance trust and compliance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Symptom management remains challenging in cancer care. Emerging from nutritional science, nutritional metabolomics has seen exponential growth over recent years, aiming to discern the relationship between dietary habits and health consequences. This protocol aims to present the rationale and methodology for conducting a scoping review to summarize the extent of evidence on synbiotics utilization in cancer symptom management among adults. The scoping review will be undertaken in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) principles and the research process guided by the PRISMA 2020 scoping reviews extension. The following electronic databases will be searched from the inception: PubMed, Cinahl, Web of Science and Scopus. The authors expect to map the literature regarding the clinical outcomes, including patient-report measures and patient-experience measures, on which the effects of probiotics were tested, and identify potential gaps. This protocol presents a rigorous methodological approach to map the literature on the clinical outcomes that the utilization of synbiotics might improve. This analysis will shape future researchers to examine the efficacy of probiotics on specific clinical outcomes in oncology care. Nurses are uniquely positioned to influence cancer symptom management through the selection and use of appropriate interventions in the field of nutritional supplements, along with nutritional counseling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background During the COVID-19 outbreak, patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) faced several changes in their daily life. However, the effects of these changes on the patients' lived experiences are not still investigated. Aims The current study explored the lived experience of people with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) during the COVID-19 pandemic. During the COVID-19 outbreak, people with LVADs faced several changes in their daily life. However, the effects of these changes on the patients' lived experiences are not still investigated. Methods and results Qualitative data analysis was conducted employing the interpretative phenomenological analysis approach. We followed the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. Eight male participants with LVAD aged from 65 to 82 were interviewed. Overall, two main themes ('Worsening of psychological distress' and 'Moving forward') and eight sub-themes emerged from the qualitative analysis. Conclusions People with LVADs experienced feelings of worry and solitude related to the risk of being infected or not receiving adequate treatment due to changes in the healthcare system during the pandemic; however, they managed to move forward with their lives using different strategies for dealing with the difficult situation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The home management of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) in the postsurgical phase represents one of the most complex phases for their parents. To date, the information available in the scientific landscape regarding the experiences and difficulties faced by the parents of children with CHD during this phase is still lacking. Accordingly, the study aims to synthesize the available qualitative evidence on parents' experience during the home care management of children with CHD after cardiac surgery. Two databases were systematically searched to identify qualitative studies relating to parental experience about the home care management of children with CHD after cardiac surgery. Studies were carried out using Noblit and Hare's meta-ethnographic approach. The search yielded 183 results. After applying the inclusion criteria, nine articles were included in the meta-synthesis. The included articles were analyzed following the meta-ethnography approach. Five main themes were identified: (a) psychological and emotional impact and daily challenges; (b) continuity of care; (c) loneliness, isolation, and the need for knowledge; (d) new parental role; (e) assistance and support. The role of parents in the postsurgical phase of children with CHD is essential. However, numerous psychological nuances and emotional contradictions emerged from the experience of parents involved in this phase. Further studies are needed to identify parenting health and psychosocial support improvement strategies at home. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Purpose: The assessment of nurses' professional values (NPVs) in Italian nurses and students is undermined by the unavailability of validated measurements. Therefore, this study aimed at providing the validation of the "Nurses Professional Values Scale-Three" (NPVS-3) in its Italian version (I-NPVS-3). Methods: The study had a multiphase design: (a) cultural and linguistic validation; (b) content and face validity; (c) construct validity. Results: I-NPVS-3 showed adequate content validity. Confirmatory factor analysis models supported the three-factorial structure of the I-NPVS-3 (i.e., caring, activism, and professionalism) in explaining data obtained from nurses and nursing students. Furthermore, each domain showed adequate internal consistency. Conclusions: I-NPVS-3 showed evidence of validity and reliability, being useful for assessing NPVs for educational and research purposes among Italian nurses and nursing students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the perception of self‐isolation at home in patients with cancer during the lockdown period resulting from the COVID‐19 outbreak in Italy. Methods: A cross‐sectional descriptive study was conducted through an online survey of patients with cancer who were sheltering at home from 29th March to 3rd May 2020. Perception of self‐isolation was assessed using the ISOLA scale, after evaluation of its psychometric properties. Content analysis was used to analyse two open‐ended questions. Results: The participants were 195 adult patients with cancer (female = 76%; mean age = 50.3 ± 11.2; haematological malignancy = 51.3%). They reported moderate isolation‐related suffering (M = 2.64 ± 0.81), problems in their relationships with others (M = 3.31 ± 1.13) and difficulties in their relationships with themselves (M = 3.14 ± 1.06). Patients who experienced significantly more social problems were older, had less education and were living without minor children. Overall, four main categories emerged from the qualitative content analysis: (1) lack of freedom and social life, (2) uncertainty and worries, (3) feeling supported and (4) dealing with isolation. Conclusion: Living with cancer in the COVID‐19 pandemic was often perceived as an isolating experience, primarily in terms of detachment from loved ones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To map the existing literature on decision regret among patients with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and develop an integrated framework to understand its impact on patient outcomes and healthcare processes., Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases was conducted until January 2024 using the "Population, Concept, Context" framework. The review identified and analyzed 28 studies published between 2005 and 2023 in North America and Europe., Results: Decision regret primarily arises from mismatches between expected and actual treatment outcomes and is strongly influenced by patient-clinician communication quality. The need for improved informed consent processes and enhanced communication strategies to mitigate regret emerged as prevalent themes. A hypothetical theoretical path was developed to define the relationship between patient expectations, medical outcomes, and emotional responses., Conclusion: Enhanced communication and personalized treatment plans are crucial for addressing the multifaceted nature of regret in healthcare. Improved patient-clinician communication and informed consent processes can significantly reduce decision regret., Practice Implications: Healthcare providers should focus on effective communication and education to personalize care strategies and align treatment decisions with patient expectations. This could ultimately reduce decision regret and improve patient outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Rosario Caruso reports financial support was provided by IRCCS Policlinico San Donato. Rosario Caruso reports a relationship with IRCCS Policlinico San Donato that includes employment. Other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Given the significance of healthcare decisions in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and their impact on patients' lives, this study aims to map the existing literature on decision regret in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations., Methods: A scoping review was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria focused on decision regret in the female population with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations, with no restrictions on the methodologies of the included studies, but only in the English language. The selection process led to the inclusion of 13 studies., Results: The analysis revealed a significant trend toward decision regret among patients facing complex medical choices. The quality of healthcare communication, decision support, and genetic counselling emerged as key factors influencing patients' perceptions and experiences, with direct implications for their quality of life and psychological well-being. The results suggest that these decisions considerably impact patients, both in terms of clinical outcomes and emotional experiences., Discussion: The investigation highlights the vital importance of a personalized care approach, emphasizing the critical role of managing patients' emotional and psychological complexity. Managing decision regret requires acute attention to individual needs and effective communication to mitigate emotional impact and improve patient outcomes., Conclusions: Insights from a nursing perspective in the analysis of results indicate the need for informed, empathetic, and integrated care that considers the emotional complexity of women with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations in their lives and health choices.

Introduction: There are no national data aimed to describe nurses' perception of variability in delivering nursing activities in relation to best practice and inequality in receiving nursing care. Moreover, there are no validated tools to be used in research. Therefore, the aims of this study are: a) to develop and validate a questionnaire to describe nurses' perceptions of variability and inequality in the oncology setting; b) to test content and face validity; c) to provide preliminary data (pilot study) to plan strategies for future national studies., Material and Methods: This is a multi-phase and multi-method study. Phase 1 is focused on questionnaire's development (i.e., literature review and consensus discussion); phase 2 is aimed to determine content and face validity of the questionnaire; and phase 3 was a pilot data collection through an on-line survey., Results: The questionnaire that was developed yielded an adequate content and face validity (S-CVI=0.89 and CVR >0.60 for all items). The pilot study (75 nurses) found that nurse participants perceived as the most relevant categories pain and gastrointestinal and oral cavity dysfunctions. Fatigue, impairments of social function and psychological disorders were the areas in which greater variability and inequalities in receiving nursing care emerged. Overall, more than 50% of nurses reported variability and inequalities in oncology symptom management (in the investigated categories)., Conclusions: The study results support the content validity of the questionnaire that can thereby be used for pan-national investigations.