Search

Purpose: To compare the quality-adjusted life expectancy between women treated with partial breast irradiation (PBI) vs. whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) for estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer.Methods and Materials: We developed a Markov model to describe health states in the 15 years after radiotherapy for estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer. Breast cancer recurrences were separated into local recurrences and elsewhere failures. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) risk was extracted from the Oxford overview, and rates and utilities were adapted from the literature. We studied two cohorts of women (aged 40 and 55 years), both of whom received adjuvant tamoxifen.Results: Assuming a no evidence of disease (NED)-PBI utility of 0.93, quality-adjusted life expectancy after PBI (and WBRT) was 12.61 (12.57) and 12.10 (12.06) years for 40-year-old and 55-year-old women, respectively. The NED-PBI utility thresholds for preferring PBI over WBRT were 0.923 and 0.921 for 40-year-old and 55-year-old women, respectively, both slightly greater than the NED-WBRT utility. Outcomes were sensitive to the utility of NED-PBI, the PBI hazard ratio for local recurrence, the baseline IBTR risk, and the percentage of IBTRs that were local. Overall the degree of superiority of PBI over WBRT was greater for 55-year-old women than for 40-year-old women.Conclusions: For most utility values of the NED-PBI health state, PBI was the preferred treatment modality. This result was highly sensitive to patient preferences and was also dependent on patient age, PBI efficacy, IBTR risk, and the fraction of IBTRs that were local. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) improves local-regional disease control and patient survival. Hypofractionation (HF) regimens have comparable efficacy and complication rates with improved quality of life compared with conventional fractionation (CF) schedules. However, the use of HF after mastectomy in patients undergoing breast reconstruction has not been prospectively examined., Objective: To compare HF and CF PMRT outcomes after implant-based reconstruction., Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial assessed patients 18 years or older undergoing mastectomy and immediate expander or implant reconstruction for breast cancer (Tis, TX, or T1-3) and unilateral PMRT from March 8, 2018, to November 3, 2021 (median [range] follow-up, 40.4 [15.4-63.0] months), at 16 US cancer centers or hospitals. Analyses were conducted between September and December 2023., Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to HF or CF PMRT. Chest wall doses were 4256 cGy for 16 fractions for HF and 5000 cGy for 25 fractions for CF. Chest wall toxic effects were defined as a grade 3 or higher adverse event., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the change in physical well-being (PWB) domain of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) quality-of-life assessment tool at 6 months after starting PMRT, controlling for age. Secondary outcomes included toxic effects and cancer recurrence., Results: Of 400 women (201 in the CF arm and 199 in the HF arm; median [range] age, 47 [23-79] years), 330 patients had PWB scores at baseline and at 6 months. There was no difference in the change in PWB between the study arms (estimate, 0.13; 95% CI, -0.86 to 1.11; P = .80), but there was a significant interaction between age group and study arm (P = .03 for interaction). Patients younger than 45 years had higher 6-month absolute PWB scores if treated with HF rather than CF regimens (23.6 [95% CI, 22.7-24.6] vs 22.0 [95% CI, 20.7-23.3]; P = .047) and reported being less bothered by adverse effects (mean [SD], 3.0 [0.9] in the HF arm and 2.6 [1.2] in the CF arm; P = .02) or nausea (mean [SD], 3.8 [0.4] in the HF arm and 3.6 [0.8] in the CF arm; P = .04). In the as-treated cohort, there were 23 distant (11 in the HF arm and 12 in the CF arm) and 2 local-regional (1 in the HF arm and 1 in the CF arm) recurrences. Chest wall toxic effects occurred in 39 patients (20 in the HF arm and 19 in the CF arm) at a median (IQR) of 7.2 (1.8-12.9) months. Fractionation was not associated with chest wall toxic effects on multivariate analysis (HF arm: hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.52-2.00; P = .95). Fewer patients undergoing HF vs CF regimens had a treatment break (5 [2.7%] vs 15 [7.7%]; P = .03) or required unpaid time off from work (17 [8.5%] vs 34 [16.9%]; P = .02)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the HF regimen did not significantly improve change in PWB compared with the CF regimen. These data add to the increasing experience with HF PMRT in patients with implant-based reconstruction., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03422003.

Purpose: We evaluated the incidence, timing, and risk factors for second primary non-breast cancers (SPNBC) among young breast cancer (BC) survivors., Methods: This study included participants of the Young Women's BC Study (YWS) who were diagnosed with stage 0-III BC between 2006 and 2016 and age 40 or younger at diagnosis (N = 1,230). Patient characteristics, treatment information, and clinical events were collected via serial surveys. Tumor and treatment data were obtained from medical record review. Five- and 10-year risks of SPNBCs were estimated via the cumulative incidence function, considering death, metastasis, or second primary BC as competing events. Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models estimated subdistribution hazard ratios (sHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for SPNBC risk based on risk factors including demographics, germline genetics, primary BC characteristics, and treatments., Results: Among 1,230 women, over a median follow-up of 10.1 years, 47 patients (4%) developed an SPNBC. Types of malignancy included melanoma (n = 10), thyroid (n = 10), ovarian (n = 4), sarcoma (n = 4), uterine (n = 3), rectal (n = 3), bladder (n = 2), cervical (n = 2), head/neck (n = 2), lung (n = 2), lymphoma (n = 2), pancreatic (n = 2), and renal (n = 1). Five and 10-year cumulative incidence were 1.4% and 3.2%, respectively. Median time between primary BC and SPNBC was 7.3 years. No patient factors, primary tumor characteristics, or treatments were statistically significantly associated with SPNBC in univariable or multivariable models., Conclusion: In this population, five-year cumulative incidence was higher than that reported among healthy women under 50 years of age, highlighting the importance of long-term surveillance for new non-breast cancers in young adult BC survivors., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background:  Prophylactic lymphatic bypass or LYMPHA (LYmphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach) is increasingly offered to prevent lymphedema following breast cancer treatment, which develops in up to 47% of patients. Previous studies focused on intraoperative and postoperative lymphedema risk factors, which are often unknown preoperatively when the decision to perform LYMPHA is made. This study aims to identify preoperative lymphedema risk factors in the high-risk inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) population., Methods:  Retrospective review of our institution's IBC program database was conducted. The primary outcome was self-reported lymphedema development. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify preoperative lymphedema risk factors, while controlling for number of lymph nodes removed during axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), number of positive lymph nodes, residual disease on pathology, and need for adjuvant chemotherapy., Results:  Of 356 patients with IBC, 134 (mean age: 51 years, range: 22-89 years) had complete data. All 134 patients underwent surgery and radiation. Forty-seven percent of all 356 patients (167/356) developed lymphedema. Obesity (body mass index > 30) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.7, confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-6.4, p  = 0.02) and non-white race (OR: 4.5, CI: 1.2-23, p  = 0.04) were preoperative lymphedema risk factors., Conclusion:  Patients with IBC are high risk for developing lymphedema due to the need for ALND, radiation, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study also identified non-white race and obesity as risk factors. Larger prospective studies should evaluate potential racial disparities in lymphedema development. Due to the high prevalence of lymphedema, LYMPHA should be considered for all patients with IBC., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on appropriate indications and techniques for partial breast irradiation (PBI) for patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ., Methods: ASTRO convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on the appropriate indications and techniques for PBI as an alternative to whole breast irradiation (WBI) to result in similar rates of ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) and toxicity outcomes. Also addressed were aspects related to the technical delivery of PBI, including dose-fractionation regimens, target volumes, and treatment parameters for different PBI techniques. The guideline is based on a systematic review provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Recommendations were created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength., Results: PBI delivered using 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy, multicatheter brachytherapy, and single-entry brachytherapy results in similar IBR as WBI with long-term follow-up. Some patient characteristics and tumor features were underrepresented in the randomized controlled trials, making it difficult to fully define IBR risks for patients with these features. Appropriate dose-fractionation regimens, target volume delineation, and treatment planning parameters for delivery of PBI are outlined. Intraoperative radiation therapy alone is associated with a higher IBR rate compared with WBI. A daily or every-other-day external beam PBI regimen is preferred over twice-daily regimens due to late toxicity concerns., Conclusions: Based on published data, the ASTRO task force has proposed recommendations to inform best clinical practices on the use of PBI., Competing Interests: Disclosures All task force members’ disclosure statements were reviewed before being invited and were shared with other task force members throughout the guideline's development. Those disclosures are published within this guideline. Where potential conflicts were detected, remedial measures to address them were taken. Bethany Anderson: American Board of Radiology (ABR) (board examiner), Brachytherapy Journal (section editor), Clinical Breast Cancer Journal (associate editor), International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics (breast section associate editor), School of Breast Oncology (honoraria); Douglas Arthur: Advanced Radiation Therapy (consultant); Jose Bazan: ABR (board examiner), ASTRO VA Breast Panel (honoraria), International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics (breast section associate editor), Intraop Medical (institutional research); Jennifer Bellon: American Board of Radiology (ABR) (oral exam chair-ended 8/2023), Leidos Pharmaceutical (honoraria), National Cancer Institute (NCI) (research; BOLD task force on breast cancer co-chair), Oncoclinicas (honoraria), PER (honoraria), Prosigna (research), UpToDate (honoraria), Varian (honoraria); Charlotte Coles: Breast Cancer Now (research), Cancer Research UK (research), Lancet Breast Cancer Commission (chair), National Institutes of Health and Care Research (NIHR) (research; IMPORT LOW trial chief investigator); Naamit Gerber: Accuray (advisory board-ended 10/2023), Invus Group (consultant), John Theurer Cancer Center (consultant), Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine (honoraria-ended 8/2022), PreludeDX (research); Leonard Kim: American Associations of Physicists in Medicine (subcommittee/working group chair), ABR (board examiner), Elekta (MR-Linac Consortium, institutional representative), The Greeley Company (consultant-ended 5/2022); Christine Laronga (Society of Surgical Oncology [SSO]representative): SSO Breast Disease Site (chair), UpToDate (section editor); Janice Lyons (Chair): ABR (board examiner), Primum (consultant); Icro Meattini: Accuray, Eli Lily, Ipsen, Novartis, Pfizer, Seagen (all advisory board); Elizabeth Nichols: ABR (board examiner), Applied Radiation Oncology (editorial board), Xcision (research, co-chair); Lori Pierce (American Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO] representative): ASCO (board chair), Breast Cancer Research Foundation (advisory board and travel), BMS Foundation DCIDCP National Advisory Committee (advisory board and travel), Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (board of directors and travel), Exact Sciences (consultant), Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium (director), PER Educational Symposium (speakers bureau and travel), UpToDate (editor); Matthew Poppe: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (technical expert), Alliance for Breast Clinical Trials in Oncology (vice chair), Alliance for Breast Clinical Trials Local Regional Working Group (chair), Mevion (honoraria and travel-ended 3/2022), NIH (research), NIH/NCI (research-PI), PEEL Therapeutics (stock), UpToDate (editor); Simona Shaitelman (Vice Chair): Alpha Tau Medical (research-ended 2022), Artios Pharma (research-ended 2022), Becton, Dickinson & Co (consultant), Brachytherapy Journal (editorial board), Elekta (MR-Linac Consortium, institutional representative), Emerson Collective Foundation (research), Exact Sciences (research), NIH (research-ended 8/2023), TAE Life Sciences (research); Patti Spears (patient representative): Pfizer (advocate advisory care committee member-ended 12/2022); Shaveta Vinayak (ASCO representative): OncoSec Biotech (research and consultant), Pfizer, Puma Biotech, Seattle Genetics (all research); Timothy Whelan: Exact Sciences (research). Lisa Bradfield and Madeera Kathpal (Guideline Subcommittee representative) reported no disclosures., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUNDHER2-targeting therapies have great efficacy in HER2-positive breast cancer, but resistance, in part due to HER2 heterogeneity (HET), is a significant clinical challenge. We previously described that in a phase II neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and pertuzumab (P) clinical trial in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, none of the patients with HER2-HET tumors had pathologic complete response (pCR).METHODSTo investigate cellular and molecular differences among tumors according to HER2 heterogeneity and pCR, we performed RNA sequencing and ERBB2 FISH of 285 pretreatment and posttreatment tumors from 129 patients in this T-DM1+P neoadjuvant trial. A subset of cases was also subject to NanoString spatial digital profiling.RESULTSPretreatment tumors from patients with pCR had the highest level of ERBB2 mRNA and ERBB signaling. HER2 heterogeneity was associated with no pCR, basal-like features, and low ERBB2 expression yet high ERBB signaling sustained by activation of downstream pathway components. Residual tumors showed decreased HER2 protein levels and ERBB2 copy number heterogeneity and increased PI3K pathway enrichment and luminal features. HET tumors showed minimal treatment-induced transcriptomic changes compared with non-HET tumors. Immune infiltration correlated with pCR and HER2-HET status.CONCLUSIONResistance mechanisms in HET and non-HET tumors are distinct. HER2-targeting antibodies have limited efficacy in HET tumors. Our results support the stratification of patients based on HET status and the use of agents that target downstream components of the ERBB signaling pathway in patients with HET tumors.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT02326974.FUNDINGThis study was funded by Roche and the National Cancer Institute.

Background: Patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) have overall poor clinical outcomes, with triple-negative IBC (TN-IBC) being associated with the worst survival, warranting the investigation of novel therapies. Preclinical studies implied that ruxolitinib (RUX), a JAK1/2 inhibitor, may be an effective therapy for TN-IBC., Methods: We conducted a randomized phase II study with nested window-of-opportunity in TN-IBC. Treatment-naïve patients received a 7-day run-in of RUX alone or RUX plus paclitaxel (PAC). After the run-in, those who received RUX alone proceeded to neoadjuvant therapy with either RUX + PAC or PAC alone for 12 weeks; those who had received RUX + PAC continued treatment for 12 weeks. All patients subsequently received 4 cycles of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide prior to surgery. Research tumor biopsies were performed at baseline (pre-run-in) and after run-in therapy. Tumors were evaluated for phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) by immunostaining, and a subset was also analyzed by RNA-seq. The primary endpoint was the percent of pSTAT3-positive pre-run-in tumors that became pSTAT3-negative. Secondary endpoints included pathologic complete response (pCR)., Results: Overall, 23 patients were enrolled, of whom 21 completed preoperative therapy. Two patients achieved pCR (8.7%). pSTAT3 and IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling decreased in post-run-in biopsies of RUX-treated samples, while sustained treatment with RUX + PAC upregulated IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling compared to RUX alone. Both treatments decreased GZMB + T cells implying immune suppression. RUX alone effectively inhibited JAK/STAT3 signaling but its combination with PAC led to incomplete inhibition. The immune suppressive effects of RUX alone and in combination may negate its growth inhibitory effects on cancer cells., Conclusion: In summary, the use of RUX in TN-IBC was associated with a decrease in pSTAT3 levels despite lack of clinical benefit. Cancer cell-specific-targeting of JAK2/STAT3 or combinations with immunotherapy may be required for further evaluation of JAK2/STAT3 signaling as a cancer therapeutic target., Trial Registration: www., Clinicaltrials: gov , NCT02876302. Registered 23 August 2016., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Implant-based reconstruction is the most common method of postmastectomy reconstruction. Many patients require postmastectomy radiation (PMRT). Tissue expanders (TEs), typically inserted as a first stage, have historically been placed subpectorally. More recently, prepectoral reconstruction has gained popularity, but its impact on PMRT is unknown. Prior studies focus on complication rates and aesthetic outcomes. This study examines whether there is a difference in radiation dosimetry among patients undergoing prepectoral versus subpectoral TE reconstruction., Methods: Electronic medical records and radiation plans of 50 patients (25 prepectoral, 25 subpectoral) who underwent mastectomy with immediate TE reconstruction at our institution or affiliate site were reviewed. Pectoralis major muscle and chest wall structures were contoured and mean percentage volumes of these structures receiving less than 95%, 100%, and more than 105% target radiation dose were calculated, as were heart and ipsilateral lung doses. Welch two sample t test, Fisher exact test, and Pearson chi-squared tests were performed., Results: The groups had comparable patient and tumor characteristics and underwent similar ablative and reconstructive procedures and radiation dosimetry. Subpectoral patients had larger mean areas receiving less than 95% target dose ("cold spots"); prepectoral patients had larger mean areas receiving greater than 105% ("hot spots") and 100% target doses. There were no differences in chest wall, heart, and lung doses., Conclusions: Our results demonstrate an increased mean percentage area of pectoralis cold spots with subpectoral reconstruction and increased area of hot spots and 100% dose delivery to the pectoralis in prepectoral patients. Larger studies should analyze long-term effects of prepectoral reconstruction on radiation dosing and recurrence rates., Competing Interests: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Randomized trials have established the safety of observation or axillary radiation (AxRT) as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with limited nodal disease who undergo upfront surgery. Variability remains in axillary management strategies in cN0 patients undergoing mastectomy found to have one to two positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). We examined the impact of intraoperative pathology assessment in axillary management in a national cohort of AMAROS-eligible mastectomy patients., Methods: The National Cancer Database was used to identify AMAROS-eligible cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients undergoing upfront mastectomy and SLN biopsy (SLNB) and found to have one to two positive SLNs, from 2018 to 2019. We constructed a variable defining intraoperative pathology as 'not performed/not acted on' if ALND was either not performed or performed at a later date than SLNB, or 'performed/acted on' if SLNB and ALND were completed on the same day. Adjusted multivariable analysis examined predictors of treatment with both ALND and AxRT., Results: Overall, 8222 patients with cT1-2N0 disease underwent upfront mastectomy and had one to two positive SLNs. Intraoperative pathology was performed/acted on in 3057 (37.2%) patients. These patients were significantly more likely to have both ALND and AxRT than those without intraoperative pathology (41.0% vs. 4.9%; p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the strongest predictor of receiving both ALND and AxRT was use of intraoperative pathology (odds ratio 8.99, 95% confidence interval 7.70-10.5; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: We advocate that consideration should be made for omission of routine intraoperative pathology in mastectomy patients likely to be recommended postmastectomy radiation to minimize axillary overtreatment with both ALND and AxRT in appropriate patients., (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected cancer care worldwide, including radiation therapy (RT) for breast cancer (BC), because of risk-based resource allocation. We report the evolution of international breast RT practices during the beginning of the pandemic, focusing on differences in treatment recommendations between countries., Materials and Methods: Between July and November 2020, a 58-question survey was distributed to radiation oncologists (ROs) through international professional societies. Changes in RT decision making during the first surge of the pandemic were evaluated across six hypothetical scenarios, including the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), early-stage, locally advanced, and metastatic BC. The significance of changes in responses before and during the pandemic was examined using chi-square and McNemar-Bowker tests., Results: One thousand one hundred three ROs from 54 countries completed the survey. Incomplete responses (254) were excluded from the analysis. Most respondents were from the United States (285), Japan (117), Italy (63), Canada (58), and Brazil (56). Twenty-one percent (230) of respondents reported treating at least one patient with BC who was COVID-19-positive. Approximately 60% of respondents reported no change in treatment recommendation during the pandemic, except for patients with metastatic disease, for which 57.7% (636/1,103; P < .0005) changed their palliative practice. Among respondents who noted a change in their recommendation during the first surge of the pandemic, omitting, delaying, and adopting short-course RT were the most frequent changes, with most transitioning to moderate hypofractionation for DCIS and early-stage BC., Conclusion: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, significant changes in global RT practice patterns for BC were introduced. The impact of published results from the FAST FORWARD trial supporting ultrahypofractionation likely confounded the interpretation of the pandemic's independent influence on RT delivery.

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare, aggressive form of breast cancer that presents as de novo metastatic disease in 20-30% of cases, with one-third of cases demonstrating HER2-positivity. There has been limited investigation into locoregional therapy utilization following HER2-directed systemic therapy for these patients, and their locoregional progression or recurrence (LRPR) and survival outcomes. Patients with de novo HER2-positive metastatic IBC (mIBC) were identified from an IRB-approved IBC registry at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Clinical, pathology, and treatment data were abstracted. Rates of LRPR, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and pathologic complete response (pCR) were determined. Seventy-eight patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2019 were identified. First-line systemic therapy comprised chemotherapy for most patients (97.4%) and HER2-directed therapy for all patients (trastuzumab [47.4%]; trastuzumab+pertuzumab [51.3%]; or trastuzumab emtansine [1.3%]). At a median follow-up of 2.7 years, the median PFS was 1.0 year, and the median OS was 4.6 years. The 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence of LRPR was 20.7% and 29.0%, respectively. Mastectomy was performed after systemic therapy in 41/78 patients (52.6%); 10 had a pCR (24.4%) and all were alive at last follow-up (1.3-8.9 years after surgery). Among 56 patients who were alive and LRPR-free at one year, 10 developed LRPR (surgery group = 1; no-surgery group = 9). In conclusion, patients with de novo HER2-positive mIBC who undergo surgery have favorable outcomes. More than half of patients received systemic and local therapy with good locoregional control and prolonged survival, suggesting a potential role for local therapy., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) have a high risk of central nervous system metastasis (mCNS). The purpose of this study was to quantify the incidence of and identify risk factors for mCNS in patients with IBC., Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with IBC between 1997 and 2019. mCNS-free survival time was defined as the date from the diagnosis of IBC to the date of diagnosis of mCNS or the date of death, whichever occurred first. A competing risks hazard model was used to evaluate risk factors for mCNS., Results: A total of 531 patients were identified; 372 patients with stage III and 159 patients with de novo stage IV disease. During the study, there were a total of 124 patients who had mCNS. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year incidence of mCNS was 5%, 9%, and 18% in stage III patients (median follow-up: 5.6 years) and 17%, 30%, and 42% in stage IV patients (1.8 years). Multivariate analysis identified triple-negative tumor subtype as a significant risk factor for mCNS for stage III patients. For patients diagnosed with metastatic disease, visceral metastasis as first metastatic site, triple-negative subtype, and younger age at diagnosis of metastases were risk factors for mCNS., Conclusions: Patients with IBC, particularly those with triple-negative IBC, visceral metastasis, and those at a younger age at diagnosis of metastatic disease, are at significant risk of developing mCNS. Further investigation into prevention of mCNS and whether early detection of mCNS is associated with improved IBC patient outcomes is warranted., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)

Background: HER2)-low expression is a predictive biomarker for novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. However, little is known about its clinical significance in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC)., Methods: Patients diagnosed with HER2-negative IBC between December 1999 and December 2020 were identified from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute IBC registry. Patients were divided into HER2-low (IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH-) and HER2-zero (IHC 0), comparing clinicopathologic features and disease outcomes between the two subgroups., Results: The study included 276 patients. Among patients with stage III (n = 209) and stage IV (n = 67) IBC, 54% and 39% had HER2-low tumours, respectively. Oestrogen receptor (ER)-expressing tumours were more common in patients with HER2-low versus HER2-zero stage III IBC (65% versus 38%, p &lt; 0.01). Among stage III patients undergoing surgery (n = 182), pathologic complete response (pCR) rates were higher for HER2-zero versus HER2-low IBC (11% versus 6%, OR: 1.8, 95%CI:0.6-5.3), but minimal differences persisted when separately analysing pCR by ER status. Similar invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) outcomes were observed among ER-positive HER2-zero versus HER2-low IBC (48-month iDFS: 63% versus 63%, HR: 1.10, 95%CI:0.57-2.13) and ER-negative HER2-zero versus HER2-low IBC (48-month iDFS: 28% versus 25%, HR: 1.19, 95%CI:0.69-2.04). Differences in overall survival (OS) were small, both among ER-positive HER2-zero versus HER2-low IBC (48-month OS: 80% versus 81%, HR: 0.82, 95%CI:0.39-1.73) and ER-negative HER2-zero versus HER2-low IBC (48-month OS: 34% versus 47%, HR: 1.34, 95%CI: 0.74-2.41)., Conclusions: Marginal differences in clinicopathologic features and outcomes were observed in HER2-low versus HER2-zero IBC when controlling for ER status, not supporting the definition of HER2-low as a distinct subtype of IBC., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

While historically reserved for patients with locally advanced breast cancer, the indications for preoperative systemic therapy have expanded in parallel with our increased understanding of breast cancer biology. Patient selection for preoperative chemotherapy is now primarily driven by breast cancer subtype and the incorporation of targeted therapies in HER2+ disease as well as immunotherapy in triple negative breast cancer have resulted in increasing response rates and more tailored treatment approaches. Potential benefits with respect to local therapy, now include both tumor downstaging to facilitate breast conservation as well as de-escalation of both axillary surgery and/or nodal radiation for patients who experience a pathologic complete response. Implementing these strategies requires a multidisciplinary approach and best practices for managing the breast and axilla after preoperative chemotherapy continue to evolve. Here we review the current landscape and future directions for local therapy considerations after preoperative chemotherapy., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale and Objectives: Preoperative systemic therapy (PST) followed by mastectomy and radiation improves survival for patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Residual disease within the skin post-PST adversely impacts surgical outcome and risk of local-regional recurrence (LRR). We aimed to assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast skin changes post-PST with pathologic response and its impact on surgical resectability., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 152 baseline and post-PST breast MRIs of 76 patients with IBC. Using the ACR-BIRADS MRI lexicon, we correlated skin thickness, qualitative enhancement, and kinetic analysis with pathologic response in the skin at mastectomy., Results: Baseline MRI showed skin thickening in all 76 patients, 75/76 (99%) showed skin enhancement, 54/75 (72%) had medium/fast initial kinetics, usually with persistent delayed kinetics in 49/54 (91%). Following PST, 66/76 (87%) had residual skin thickening with 64/76 (84%) showing a decrease; 33/76 (43%) had persistent enhancement. The median thickness post-PST was 4.7 mm with residual tumor in the skin, and 3.0 mm without residual tumor (p = 0.008). Regardless of pathologic response, the majority of patients had persistent skin thickening on MRI following PST (100% [14/14] with residual tumor and 84% [52/62] without residual tumor). There was no association between post-PST skin thickness on breast MRI and rate of LRR., Conclusion: Patients with IBC have skin thickening and enhancement on baseline breast MRI, with a statistically significant reduction in skin thickness following successful PST. Despite persistent skin changes on MRI, patients achieving a partial or complete parenchymal response to PST may proceed to mastectomy with low LRR rates., (Copyright © 2021 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapy improves local control among women with HER2-positive breast cancer. This retrospective analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) among patients receiving adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) or paclitaxel (T) plus trastuzumab (H) in the ATEMPT (Adjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Paclitaxel in Combination With Trastuzumab) trial; Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) 033., Methods and Materials: Patients with stage I HER2-positive breast cancer were randomized 3:1 to receive adjuvant T-DM1 or TH after mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Breast RT was required after BCS and permitted after mastectomy. Patients receiving T-DM1 began RT after 12 weeks of therapy and received RT concurrently with T-DM1. Patients receiving TH began RT after paclitaxel, but concurrent with trastuzumab. RT records were retrospectively reviewed to determine details of radiation delivery and acute RT-related toxicity., Results: Protocol therapy was initiated by 497 patients. Among the 299 BCS patients, 289 received whole breast RT (WBRT) and 10 partial breast. Among WBRT patients, 40.2% in the T-DM1 arm and 41.5% of TH patients received hypofractionated (≥2.5 Gy/fraction) RT. Eight mastectomy patients received RT, all conventional fractionation. Skin toxicity (grade ≥2) was seen in 33.9% of patients in the T-DM1 arm and 23.2% in the TH arm (P = .11). In conventionally fractionated WBRT patients, 44.7% had a grade ≥2 skin toxicity compared with 17.9% of patients receiving hypofractionation (P < .001). Five patients experienced pneumonitis after RT (T-DM1: n = 4, 1.0%; TH: n = 1, 0.9%). Three-year invasive disease-free survival was 97.8% for T-DM1 (95% confidence interval, 96.3-99.3) and 93.4% for TH (95% confidence interval, 88.7-98.2). Among the 18 invasive disease-free survival events, 7 were isolated locoregional recurrences (2, T-DM1; 5, TH)., Conclusions: RT was well-tolerated when given concurrently with either T-DM1 or TH. Among BCS patients, hypofractionation resulted in lower grade ≥2 acute skin toxicity even with concurrent anti-HER2 therapy. Although follow-up was short, local recurrences were uncommon, attesting to the efficacy of HER2-directed therapy combined with RT., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: CALGB 40603 (NCT00861705), a 2 × 2 randomized phase II trial, demonstrated that adding carboplatin or bevacizumab to weekly paclitaxel (wP) followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide significantly increased the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer. We now report long-term outcomes (LTOs) and correlative science end points., Patients and Methods: The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate LTOs in 443 patients who initiated study treatment. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the impact of clinical characteristics, pathologic response, calculated residual cancer burden (RCB) in patients with residual disease (RD), treatment assignment, and dose delivery during wP on LTOs, including event-free survival (EFS). Genomic predictors of treatment response and outcomes were assessed on pretreatment tumor samples by mRNA sequencing., Results: Among baseline characteristics, only the clinical stage was associated with LTOs. At a median follow-up of 7.9 years, LTOs were not significantly improved with either carboplatin or bevacizumab, overall or in patients with basal-like subtype cancers by genomic analysis. Patients with pCR (n = 205, 46.3%) had significantly higher 5-year EFS (85.5% v 56.6%, log-rank P < .0001) and overall survival (87.9% v 63.4%, P < .0001) rates compared with patients with RD, even those with RCB class I. Among clinical and genomic features, evidence of immune activation, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and low B-cell receptor evenness, was associated with pCR and improved EFS., Conclusion: Despite higher pCR rates, neither carboplatin nor bevacizumab appeared to improve LTOs although the study was not powered to assess these secondary end points. pCR was associated with superior LTOs even when compared with minimal RD. Markers of immune activation in pretreatment tumor biopsies were independently associated with higher pCR rates and improved survival., Competing Interests: Karla BallmanConsulting or Advisory Role: Medtronic, Takeda, AgenusPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Prostate cancer signature patent (Inst)Expert Testimony: Janssen Oncology, Lilly, Sanofi Sara SelitskyEmployment: QuantBio, Sash BiosciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: GeneCentric, C4 Therapeutics, Select ImmunoGenomics, FORMA Therapeutics, Atlas Venture, CytomX Therapeutics (Inst), Actym Therapeutics (Inst), Capulus Therapeutics (Inst), Codagenix (Inst) Joel S. ParkerStock and Other Ownership Interests: GeneCentric, Reveal GenomicsConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb/CelgenePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: J.S.P. has authored patents related to the PAM50 algorithm, which are licensed to NanoString Technologies Patricia A. SpearsConsulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer Sara M. TolaneyThis author is a member of the Journal of Clinical Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Lilly, Nektar, NanoString Technologies, AstraZeneca, Puma Biotechnology, Genentech, Eisai, Sanofi, Celldex, Bristol Myers Squibb, Paxman, Seattle Genetics, Odonate Therapeutics, AbbVie, Silverback Therapeutics, G1 Therapeutics, OncoPep, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Samsung Bioepis, CytomX Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Athenex, Immunomedics/Gilead, Mersana, Certara, 4D Pharma, Ellipses Pharma, OncoSec, Chugai Pharma, BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, OncXerna TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Genentech/Roche (Inst), Merck (Inst), Exelixis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Eisai (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), NanoString Technologies (Inst), Cyclacel (Inst), Nektar (Inst), Immunomedics (Inst), Odonate Therapeutics (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Lilly, Merck, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Genentech/Roche, Immunomedics, Eisai, NanoString Technologies, Puma Biotechnology, Celldex Cynthia MaConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Agendia, AstraZeneca, Athenex, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Biovica Inc, Eisai, Olaris, Philips Electronics, Puma Biotechnology, Sanofi Genzyme, Jacobio, Natera, InivataResearch Funding: Pfizer (Inst), Puma Biotechnology (Inst) Eleftherios MamounasHonoraria: Genentech/Roche, Genomic Health, PreciscaConsulting or Advisory Role: Genomic Health, BioTheranostics, Roche/Genentech, Merck, Puma Biotechnology, Precisca, AgendiaSpeakers' Bureau: Genomic Health, Genentech/Roche Mehra GolshanConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, BertisResearch Funding: Breast Cancer Research Foundation Jennifer R. BellonThis author is a member of the Journal of Clinical Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.Leadership: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology PhysicsHonoraria: UpToDate, Accuray, Leidos Biomedical Research, Grupo OncoclinicasResearch Funding: NanoString Technologies (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Coeditor of breast cancer textbook (Radiation Therapy Techniques and Treatment Planning for Breast Cancer). Honorarium, SpringerOther Relationship: Varian Medical Systems Deborah CollyarHonoraria: PfizerConsulting or Advisory Role: Parexel, MaxisIT, Kinnate BiopharmaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Parexel Olwen M. HahnLeadership: Via OncologyStock and Other Ownership Interests: Teleflex MedicalHonoraria: Cardinal Health (I)Consulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, hmpglobal.comTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Cardinal Health (I) Clifford A. HudisUncompensated Relationships: Alliance Foundation Trials, Columbia University, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterOpen Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/471974/summary Eric P. WinerHonoraria: Genentech/Roche, Genomic HealthConsulting or Advisory Role: Leap Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Jounce Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Carrick Therapeutics, Lilly, G1 Therapeutics, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Genentech/Roche, Gilead Sciences, Zymeworks, AthenexResearch Funding: Genentech (Inst)Other Relationship: InfiniteMD Ann PartridgePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I receive small royalty payments for coauthoring the breast cancer survivorship section of UpToDateOpen Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/835197 Terry HyslopConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie Lisa A. CareyResearch Funding: Syndax (Inst), Novartis (Inst), NanoString Technologies (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst), Veracyte (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Royalty-sharing agreement, investorship interest in licensed IP to startup company, Falcon Therapeutics, that is designing neural stem-cell–based therapy for glioblastoma multiforme (I)Uncompensated Relationships: Sanofi (Inst), Novartis (Inst), G1 Therapeutics (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Aptitude Health (Inst), Exact Sciences (Inst), EisaiOpen Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/179671 Charles M. PerouLeadership: GeneCentricStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bioclassifier, GeneCentric, Reveal GenomicsConsulting or Advisory Role: Bioclassifier, GeneCentric, NanoString Technologies, Veracyte, Reveal GenomicsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Royalties from PAM50 breast cancer gene patent application and from lung gene signature patentTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda, Chugai Pharma William M. SikovHonoraria: UpToDateSpeakers' Bureau: Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Seattle GeneticsNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background: Following publication of the AMAROS trial, we sought to optimize axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) + axillary radiation (AxRT) utilization in cT1-2N0 patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) after mastectomy., Methods: In November 2015, our multidisciplinary group implemented a protocol to omit intraoperative SLN evaluation for mastectomy patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer likely to be recommended PMRT if found to have 1-2 positive SLNs (age ≤ 60 years and/or high-risk features defined as estrogen receptor-negative and/or positive for lymphovascular invasion). We prospectively evaluated axillary management, short-term complications, and oncologic outcomes in patients with 1-2 positive SLNs., Results: From November 2015 to December 2018, 479 of 560 (85%) cT1-2N0 breast cancers treated with mastectomy were potential candidates for PMRT. Intraoperative SLN evaluation was omitted in 344 (72%), thus following the protocol. Overall, 121 cases had 1-2 positive SLNs: 17 (14%) were managed with observation, 5 (4%) PMRT alone, 59 (49%) PMRT + AxRT, 16 (13%) ALND alone, and 24 (20%) ALND + PMRT. Protocol compliance resulted in less ALND (8% vs. 24%) and less ALND + PMRT (9% vs. 41%, p < 0.01). At median follow-up of 24 months, there was one regional and four distant recurrences, with no regional recurrences or differences in disease-free survival in patients treated with ALND versus PMRT + AxRT (100% vs. 98%, p = 0.67). Similarly, there were no differences in complication rates (p = 0.18)., Conclusions: Omitting intraoperative SLN evaluation in cT1-2N0 mastectomy patients who would be candidates for PMRT if found to have positive nodes decreased rates of ALND and minimized use of ALND + PMRT without compromising outcomes., (© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: Accurate measurement of healthcare costs is required to assess and improve the value of oncology care., Objectives: We aimed to determine the cost of breast cancer care provision across collaborating health care organizations., Methods: We used time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) to calculate the complete cost of breast cancer care-initial treatment planning, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgical resection and reconstruction, and ancillary services (e.g., psychosocial oncology, physical therapy)-across multiple hospital sites. Data were collected between December 2019 and February 2020. TDABC steps involved (1) developing process maps for care delivery pathways; (2) determine capacity cost rates for staff, medical equipment, and hospital space; (3) measure the time required for each process step, both manually through clinic observation and using data from the Real-Time Location System (RTLS); and (4) calculate the total cost of care delivery., Results: Surgical care costs ranged from $1431 for a lumpectomy to $12,129 for a mastectomy with prepectoral implant reconstruction. Radiation therapy was costed at $1224 for initial simulation and patient education, and $200 for each additional treatment. Base costs for chemotherapy delivery were $382 per visit, with additional costs driven by chemotherapy agent(s) administered. Personnel expenses were the greatest contributor to the cost of surgical care, except in mastectomy with implant reconstruction, where device costs equated to up to 60% of the cost of surgery., Conclusion: The cost of complete breast cancer care depended on (1) treatment protocols; (2) patient choice of reconstruction; and (3) the need for ancillary services (e.g., physical therapy). Understanding the actual costs and cost drivers of breast cancer care delivery may better inform resource utilization to lower the cost and improve the quality of care., (© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Purpose: Few sub-Saharan African studies have ascertained utilization for postmastectomy radiation (PMRT) for breast cancer, the second most common cancer among African women. We estimated PMRT utilization and identified predictors of PMRT receipt in Zimbabwe., Methods: Retrospective patient cohort included non-metastatic breast cancer patients treated from 2014 to 2019. PMRT eligibility was assigned per NCCN guidelines. Patients receiving chemotherapy for non-metastatic disease were also included. The primary endpoint was receipt of PMRT, defined as chest wall with/without regional nodal radiation. Predictors of receiving PMRT were identified using logistic regression. Model performance was evaluated using the c statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow test for goodness-of-fit., Results: 201 women with localized disease and median follow-up of 11.4 months (IQR 3.3-17.9) were analyzed. PMRT was indicated in 177 women and utilized in 59(33.3%). Insurance coverage, clinical nodal involvement, higher grade, positive margins, and hormone therapy receipt were associated with higher odds of PMRT receipt. In adjusted models, no hormone therapy (aOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.043, 0.35) and missing grade (aOR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01, 0.38) were associated with lower odds of PMRT receipt. The resulting c statistic was 0.84, with Hosmer-Lemeshow p-value of 0.93 indicating good model fit., Conclusion: PMRT was utilized in 33% of those meeting NCCN criteria. Missing grade and no endocrine therapy receipt were associated with reduced likelihood of PMRT utilization. In addition to practice adjustments such as increasing hypofractionation and increasing patient access to standard oncologic testing at diagnosis could increase postmastectomy utilization., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) experience higher local-regional recurrence rates than those with luminal or HER2-positive tumors. This prospective, phase 1B trial was designed to assess the safety and to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cisplatin with radiation therapy for women with early-stage TNBC., Methods and Materials: Eligible patients had stage II or III TNBC. Cisplatin was initiated at 10 mg/m 2 intravenously once weekly during radiation and then escalated in a 3 + 3 design by 10 mg/m 2 at each dose level until 40 mg/m 2 , or the MTD, was reached. Patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT) or mastectomy were accrued in separate parallel cohorts during dose escalation, followed by a 10-patient expansion at the MTD., Results: During 2013 to 2018, 55 patients were accrued. Four patients developed dose-limiting toxicity. In the BCT cohort, 1 patient receiving 40 mg/m 2 developed tinnitus resulting in a cisplatin delay; therefore, this was the BCT cohort MTD. In the mastectomy cohort, 1 patient receiving 20 mg/m 2 developed a grade 3 urinary infection, and 2 additional patients had dose-limiting toxicities at 40 mg/m 2 (grade 3 neutropenia and grade 2 tinnitus), both resulting in cisplatin delay. Thus, 30 mg/m 2 was the mastectomy cohort MTD. Median follow-up was 48.5 months. Three-year disease-free survival was 74.7% for the BCT cohort and 64.4% for the mastectomy cohort., Conclusions: Adjuvant radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin is feasible with a recommended phase 2 dose of 30 mg/m 2 and 40 mg/m 2 intravenously weekly in mastectomy and BCT cohorts, respectively., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Advances in germline genetic testing have led to a surge in identification of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) variant carriers among breast cancer patients, raising numerous questions regarding use of breast radiation therapy (RT) in this population., Methods: A literature search using PubMed identified articles assessing association(s) between the germline ATM variant status and the risk of toxicity after breast RT. An expert panel of breast radiation oncologists, genetic counselors, and basic scientists convened to review the association between ATM variants and radiation-induced toxicity or secondary malignancy risk and to determine any impact on breast RT recommendations., Results: Carriers of pathogenic variants in ATM have a 2- to 4-fold increased risk for developing breast cancer. ATM variants do not consistently increase risks of toxicities after RT, except possibly among patients with the single nucleotide variant c5557G>A (rs1801516), in whom a small increased risk for the development of both acute and late radiation effects has been identified. In most breast cancer patients with ATM variants, the excess 5-year absolute risk of developing a secondary contralateral breast cancer (CBC) after radiation is extremely low. The exception is in women younger than 45 years old with deleterious rare ATM missense variants, who may be at higher risk for developing a radiation-induced CBC over time., Conclusions: Adjuvant radiation is safe for most breast cancer patients who harbor ATM variants. The possible exceptions are patients with the variant c5557G>A (rs1801516) and patients younger than 45 years old with certain rare deleterious ATM variants, who may be at higher risk for developing CBC. These latter patients should be counseled regarding this potential risk, and every effort should be made to minimize the contralateral breast dose. However, the inconsistency of published data limits precise recommendations, magnifying the need for further prospective studies and the development of a centralized database cataloging RT outcomes and genetic status., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: In sub-Saharan Africa, radiotherapy (RT) utilization and delivery patterns have not been extensively studied in patients with metastatic breast cancer., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of female patients with metastatic breast cancer seen at Parirenyatwa Radiotherapy Centre in Zimbabwe from 2014 to 2018 was conducted. Demographics, pathology, staging, and treatment data were abstracted through chart review. Fisher's exact test and chi-squared test of independence were used to compare proportions, and independent two-sample t -tests were used to compare means., Results: Of 351 patients with breast cancer, 152 (43%) had metastatic disease, median age 51 years (interquartile range: 43-61 years). Of those with metastatic disease, 30 patients (20%) received radiation to various metastatic sites: 16 spine; three nonspine bone metastases; six whole brain; and five chest wall or supraclavicular. Patients who received radiation were younger (46 v 52 years; P = .019), but did not differ significantly by performance status than those who did not. The most common dose prescription was 30 Gy in 10 fractions (33%). Five (17%) patients had treatment interruption and two (7%) had treatment noncompletion. Province of origin and clinical tumor stage were significant predictors of RT receipt ( P = .002; and P = .018, respectively)., Conclusion: A minority of patients with metastatic breast cancer received RT (20%), and these were likely to be younger, with advanced tumor stage, and resided in provinces where RT is available. Conventional courses were generally prescribed. There is a need to strongly consider palliative RT as an option for patients with metastatic breast cancer and use of hypofractionated courses (e.g. 8 Gy in one fraction) may support this goal., Competing Interests: Jennifer Ruth BellonLeadership: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • PhysicsHonoraria: UpToDate, Accuray, Leidos Biomedical Research, Grupo OncoclinicasResearch Funding: NanoString TechnologiesPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Coeditor of breast cancer textbook (Radiation Therapy Techniques and Treatment Planning for Breast Cancer). Honorarium, SpringerOther Relationship: Varian Medical Systems Shekinah Nefreteri Cluff ElmoreStock and Other Ownership Interests: TeladocConsulting or Advisory Role: Best Doctors Inc, WildtypeNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background: Breast cancer is the second most common cancer among women in Zimbabwe. Patients face socioeconomic barriers to accessing oncology care, including radiotherapy. We sought to understand patterns of care and adherence for women with breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) with radiotherapy access., Methods: A retrospective cohort was created for women with breast cancer evaluated at the Parirenyatwa Hospital Radiotherapy and Oncology Center (RTC) from 2014 to 2018. Clinical data were collected to define patterns of care. Non-adherence was modeled as a binary outcome with different criteria for patients with localized versus metastatic disease., Results: In total, 351 women presented with breast cancer with median age 51 at diagnosis (IQR: 43-61). Receptor status was missing for 71% (248). 199 (57%) had non-metastatic disease, and 152 (43%) had metastases. Of women with localized disease, 34% received post-mastectomy radiation. Of women with metastatic disease, 9.7% received radiotherapy. Metastatic disease and missing HIV status were associated with increased odds of study-defined non-adherence (aOR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.05, 3.28; aOR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.11, 4.05), while availability of ER/PR status was associated with lower odds of non-adherence (aOR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.36)., Conclusions: Radiotherapy is likely underutilized for women with breast cancer, even in a setting with public sector availability. Exploring patient-level factors that influence adherence to care may provide clinicians with better tools to support adherence and improve survival. Greater investment is needed in multidisciplinary, multimodality care for breast cancer in SSA., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Caring for older patients with breast cancer presents unique clinical considerations because of preexisting and competing comorbidity, the potential for treatment-related toxicity, and the consequent impact on functional status. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, treatment decision making for older patients is especially challenging and encourages us to refocus our treatment priorities. While we work to avoid treatment delays and maintain therapeutic benefit, we also need to minimize the risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exposures, myelosuppression, general chemotherapy toxicity, and functional decline. Herein, we propose multidisciplinary care considerations for the aging patient with breast cancer, with the goal to promote a team-based, multidisciplinary treatment approach during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. These considerations remain relevant as we navigate the "new normal" for the approximately 30% of breast cancer patients aged 70 years and older who are diagnosed in the United States annually and for the thousands of older patients living with recurrent and/or metastatic disease., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Importance: During the COVID-19 pandemic, cancer therapy may put patients at risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality. The impacts of proposed alternatives on reducing infection risk are unknown., Objective: To investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with the risks and benefits of standard radiation therapy (RT)., Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness study used estimated individual patient-level data extracted from published Kaplan-Meier survival figures from 8 randomized clinical trials across oncology from 1993 to 2014 that evaluated the inclusion of RT or compared different RT fractionation regimens. Included trials were Dutch TME and TROG 01.04 examining rectal cancer; CALGB 9343, OCOG hypofractionation trial, FAST-Forward, and NSABP B-39 examining early stage breast cancer, and CHHiP and HYPO-RT-PC examining prostate cancer. Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality associated with receipt of RT in the treatment arms were simulated and trials were reanalyzed. Data were analyzed between April 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020., Exposures: COVID-19 risk associated with treatment was simulated across different pandemic scenarios, varying infection risk per fractions (IRFs) and case fatality rates (CFRs)., Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards modeling under different pandemic scenarios., Results: Estimated IPLD from a total of 14 170 patients were included in the simulations. In scenarios with low COVID-19-associated risks (IRF, 0.5%; CFR, 5%), fractionation was not significantly associated with outcomes. In locally advanced rectal cancer, short-course RT was associated with better outcomes than long-course chemoradiation (TROG 01.04) and was associated with similar outcomes as RT omission (Dutch TME) in most settings (eg, TROG 01.04 median HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.46-0.96]; Dutch TME median HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.80-1.03] in a scenario with IRF 5% and CFR 20%). Moderate hypofractionation in early stage breast cancer (OCOG hypofractionation trial) and prostate cancer (CHHiP) was not associated with survival benefits in the setting of COVID-19 (eg, OCOG hypofractionation trial median HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.74-1.06]; CHHiP median HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.75-1.01] under high-risk scenario with IRF 10% and CFR 30%). More aggressive hypofractionation (FAST-Forward, HYPO-RT-PC) and accelerated partial breast irradiation (NSABP B-39) were associated with improved survival in higher risk scenarios (eg, FAST-Forward median HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.49-0.68]; HYPO-RT-PC median HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.48-0.75] under scenario with IRF 10% and CFR 30%)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness study of data from 8 clinical trials of patients receiving radiation therapy to simulate COVID-19 risk and mortality rates, treatment modification was not associated with altered risk from COVID-19 in lower-risk scenarios and was only associated with decreased mortality in very high COVID-19-risk scenarios. This model, which can be adapted to dynamic changes in COVID-19 risk, provides a flexible, quantitative approach to assess the potential impact of treatment modifications and supports the continued delivery of standard evidence-based care with appropriate precautions against COVID-19.