Search

Background: Older adults suffer from increased rates of dysphagia and dysphonia, both of which have a profound effect on quality of life and are often underdiagnosed. We sought to better understand the prevalence of these complaints and the potential utility of a patient‐reported screening program in a geriatrics clinic. Methods: Using an IRB‐approved cross‐sectional survey and retrospective cohort design, we recruited participants from a population of new patients seeking care at an academic geriatrics clinic. We used three validated questionnaires to assess self‐reported dysphagia, dysphonia, and pill dysphagia: the Eating‐Assessment Tool‐10 (EAT‐10), the Voice Handicap Index‐10 (VHI‐10), and the PILL‐5. Patients who screened positive on any questionnaire were offered referral to a laryngologist for additional evaluation. Patients who screened positive on the PILL‐5 were also offered referral to our geriatric pharmacist. Results: Among our 300 patients surveyed, the mean age was 76 (SD 8.46). A total of 82 (27.3%) patients screened positive (73 on EAT‐10, 10 on PILL‐5, 13 on VHI‐10) and were offered referral, of which 36 accepted. These positive screening patients took more prescription medications (p =.024) and had a higher GDS score (p <.001) when compared to the patients who screened negative. Conclusions: Many new patients seeking generalized care at our center screened positively for dysphagia and/or dysphonia on validated questionnaires. Geriatric patients may benefit from integrating screening for these disorders to identify the need of further evaluation. It is unknown if these survey tools are appropriate in a non‐otolaryngology clinic. Level of evidence: III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Organ preservation (OP) treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer has increased compared to primary total laryngectomy. Our study compares oncologic and functional outcomes between these approaches. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Single tertiary care institution. Methods: Retrospective review of patients receiving primary total laryngectomy or OP for laryngeal cancer between 1/1/2000 and 12/31/2018. Results: A total of 118 patients received primary total laryngectomy and 119 received OP. Overall survival was similar between total laryngectomy and OP. When stratified by T stage, disease‐free survival was worse among T3 patients receiving OP versus total laryngectomy. In T3 patients, 28 OP patients experienced local recurrence (28.9%) compared to 3 total laryngectomy patients (7.1%; p < 0.01). In total, 20 OP patients with local recurrence received salvage surgery. These patients had similar overall survival to patients who underwent initial total laryngectomy (TL). About 14 OP patients with local recurrence did not receive salvage surgery. About 89 (75.4%) TL patients achieved normal diet as compared to 64 (53.8%) OP patients (p < 0.001). In TL patients, 106 (89.8%) received primary or secondary tracheoesophageal‐prosthesis, 82 (77.4%) of whom achieved completely understandable speech. Conclusions: There was no difference in survival by treatment in T4 patients, possibly because of strict patient selection. However, disease‐free survival was worse in T3 patients receiving OP, likely due to a high local recurrence rate. Approximately 40% of patients with local recurrence were not eligible for salvage laryngectomy. TL patients had comparable swallowing and speech outcomes with OP patients. Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:1122–1131, 2023 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]