1. Objective score from initial interview identifies patients with probable dissociative seizures
- Author
-
Kerr, Wesley T, Janio, Emily A, Chau, Andrea M, Braesch, Chelsea T, Le, Justine M, Hori, Jessica M, Patel, Akash B, Gallardo, Norma L, Allas, Corinne H, Karimi, Amir H, Dubey, Ishita, Sreenivasan, Siddhika S, Bauirjan, Janar, Hwang, Eric S, Davis, Emily C, D'Ambrosio, Shannon R, Al Banna, Mona, Mazumder, Rajarshi, Wu, Ting, DeCant, Zachary A, Gibbs, Michael G, Chang, Edward, Zhang, Xingruo, Cho, Andrew Y, Beimer, Nicholas J, Engel, Jerome, Cohen, Mark S, and Stern, John M
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Sciences ,Brain Disorders ,Epilepsy ,Neurosciences ,Neurodegenerative ,Clinical Research ,4.2 Evaluation of markers and technologies ,Neurological ,Conversion Disorder ,Dissociative Disorders ,Electroencephalography ,Humans ,Prospective Studies ,Retrospective Studies ,Seizures ,Functional seizures ,Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures ,Clinical decision support tool ,Machine learning ,Artificial intelligence ,Neurology & Neurosurgery ,Biological psychology ,Clinical and health psychology - Abstract
ObjectiveTo develop a Dissociative Seizures Likelihood Score (DSLS), which is a comprehensive, evidence-based tool using information available during the first outpatient visit to identify patients with "probable" dissociative seizures (DS) to allow early triage to more extensive diagnostic assessment.MethodsBased on data from 1616 patients with video-electroencephalography (vEEG) confirmed diagnoses, we compared the clinical history from a single neurology interview of patients in five mutually exclusive groups: epileptic seizures (ES), DS, physiologic nonepileptic seizure-like events (PSLE), mixed DS plus ES, and inconclusive monitoring. We used data-driven methods to determine the diagnostic utility of 76 features from retrospective chart review and applied this model to prospective interviews.ResultsThe DSLS using recursive feature elimination (RFE) correctly identified 77% (95% confidence interval (CI), 74-80%) of prospective patients with either ES or DS, with a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 84%. This accuracy was not significantly inferior than neurologists' impression (84%, 95% CI: 80-88%) and the kappa between neurologists' and the DSLS was 21% (95% CI: 1-41%). Only 3% of patients with DS were missed by both the fellows and our score (95% CI 0-11%).SignificanceThe evidence-based DSLS establishes one method to reliably identify some patients with probable DS using clinical history. The DSLS supports and does not replace clinical decision making. While not all patients with DS can be identified by clinical history alone, these methods combined with clinical judgement could be used to identify patients who warrant further diagnostic assessment at a comprehensive epilepsy center.
- Published
- 2020