Search

BackgroundPosttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common in primary care patients; however, evidence-based treatments are typically only available in specialty mental healthcare settings and often not accessed.ObjectiveTo test the effectiveness of a brief primary care-based treatment, Clinician-Supported PTSD Coach (CS PTSD Coach) was compared with Primary Care Mental Health Integration-Treatment as Usual (PCMHI-TAU) in (1) reducing PTSD severity, (2) engaging veterans in specialty mental health care, and (3) patient satisfaction with care.DesignMulti-site randomized pragmatic clinical trial.ParticipantsA total of 234 veterans with PTSD symptoms who were not currently accessing PTSD treatment.InterventionCS PTSD Coach was designed to be implemented in Veterans Affairs PCMHI and combines mental health clinician support with the "PTSD Coach" mobile app. Four 30-min sessions encourage daily use of symptom management strategies.Main measuresPTSD severity was measured by clinician-rated interviews pre- and post-treatment (8 weeks). Self-report measures assessed PTSD, depression, and quality of life at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 16- and 24-week follow-ups, and patient satisfaction at post-treatment. Mental healthcare utilization was extracted from medical records.Key resultsClinician-rated PTSD severity did not differ by condition at post-treatment. CS PTSD Coach participants improved more on patient-reported PTSD severity at post-treatment than TAU participants (D = .28, p = .021). Coach participants who continued to have problematic PTSD symptoms at post-treatment were not more likely to engage in 2 sessions of specialty mental health treatment than TAU participants. Coach participants engaged in 74% more sessions in the intervention and reported higher treatment satisfaction than TAU participants (p

Objectives: Study objectives were to: 1) iteratively adapt the Transdiagnostic Sleep and Circadian Intervention (TranS-C) for patients in cardiac rehabilitation (CR; Phase 1) and 2) conduct a preliminary single group pre-post intervention test to a) evaluate procedural feasibility and intervention acceptability and b) to explore preliminary pre-post changes in self-reported sleep, disability, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; Phase 2). Method: In Phase 1, 12 individuals in CR and six content experts completed interviews to inform TranS-C adaptations. Interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. In Phase 2, eight individuals in CR completed a baseline assessment, the adapted TranS-C intervention, and a post-intervention assessment. Intervention acceptability was assessed via questionnaire and interview. Sleep, disability, and HRQoL outcomes were assessed using questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative measures; interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. Results: Phase 1 participants were receptive to the premise and structure of the adapted intervention. In Phase 2, participants endorsed positive attitudes toward the intervention. Seven of eight participants demonstrated improvements in sleep outcomes. Disability and HRQoL results did not consistently improve. Conclusion: The adapted TranS-C intervention was acceptable to CR patients and could yield improvements in subjective sleep outcomes. Larger-scale testing in CR is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Military veterans are at increased risk for headache disorders compared to the general population, yet the prevalence and burden associated with headache disorders among veterans is not yet well understood. In this electronic medical record study, we examined the prevalence of headache disorders among veterans seen in a northeastern network of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) primary care during 2017–2018. We also examined rates of psychiatric comorbidity and health care utilization of veterans with headache disorders for the year following the date of the first headache code in the medical record. Of the total population of veterans in the network, 1.3% had a headache disorder and another 3.5% had a possible headache disorder. Migraine and chronic migraine represented the majority of cases. Posttraumatic stress disorder was the most frequent psychiatric comorbidity. Having a headache disorder was associated with higher rates of primary care, neurology, pain clinic, and mental health service use but not higher rates of emergency department or Whole Health (e.g., patient-centered, holistic health services) use. Prevalence findings are comparable to those previously found among veterans, but a substantial proportion of veterans may have been misdiagnosed. Veterans with headache disorders have high rates of psychiatric comorbidity and use several types of health services at higher rates. Findings highlight the need for interdisciplinary care and further education and support for primary care providers. Primary care settings that integrate evidence-based behavioral and Whole Health services may be an optimal way of providing more holistic care for headache disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What is the Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model of service delivery? Clinician innovators, administrators, and researchers have continued to refine the answer to this question. In the same way a recipe for mac n cheese provides the resources needed (i.e., ingredients), processes to make the dish, and expected outcomes (e.g., number of servings), a comprehensive operational definition for PCBH is needed to help improve the rigor of research being conducted. This recipe can also help clinicians/administrators identify a basic recipe for PCBH that standardizes the necessary components and amounts to achieve the expected outcomes. In this editorial, we provide a comprehensive operational recipe for PCBH based on current research. We are calling people to assist us by (a) utilizing the recipe to help improve the reporting and rigor of PCBH research and (b) applying the proposed operational definitions and targets within the recipe to help us refine and validate them. Public Significance Statement This article discusses a comprehensive operational definition for PCBH, which includes resources/structural components, activities/processes, and expected outcomes. Keywords: integrated primary care, PCBH, fidelity, adherence, definition, The Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model of integrated primary care service delivery was developed by clinicians, has a strong grass roots following, and is one of the most popular [...]

Introduction: Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain (Brief CBT-CP) is a biopsychosocial treatment designed to improve access to nonpharmacological pain care in primary care. Results from a clinical demonstration project in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) clinics showed rapid improvement in pain outcomes following Brief CBT-CP treatment in Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH). As part of this larger project, the current work aimed to understand patients' perspectives of Brief CBT-CP via a self-report survey completed posttreatment. Method: Thirty-four primary care patients received Brief CBT-CP as part of their usual VHA care and subsequently completed an anonymous survey that included questions regarding treatment modality, intervention content, utility, and satisfaction, as well as global assessment of change in pain-related functioning. Results: Participants reported that Brief CBT-CP content was useful (91%) and that they were satisfied with the intervention overall (89%), including appointment length, frequency of encounters, and comprehensibility of content. On average (M = 4.50, SD = 1.71), participants reported 'somewhat better' to 'moderately better' pain-related functioning following treatment. Exploratory descriptive analysis indicated that self-reported change in function following treatment may vary by patient characteristics, including gender and opioid use history. Discussion: Patients were receptive to Brief CBT-CP, were satisfied with their experience during treatment, and reported benefit in pain-related functioning after treatment. Further development and evaluation of Brief CBT-CP as a feasible biopsychosocial treatment option for pain in primary care clinics using the PCBH model of integration is warranted. Public Significance Statement This study showed that patients who completed Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain found treatment to be highly acceptable in terms of the length and frequency of appointments, understandability and utility of treatment content, and impact on pain-related functioning. This protocol is well suited for delivery in integrated primary care settings and may serve to extend the reach of safe, behavioral treatments for chronic pain. Keywords: chronic pain, primary health care, mental health services, primary care behavioral health, cognitive behavioral therapy, Recommendations for chronic pain management increasingly emphasize nonpharmacological interventions due to safety concerns over opioids (Dowell et al., 2016). Psychological therapies are effective treatments for chronic pain (Williams et al., [...]

I bet that if you are a primary care behavioral health (PCBH) enthusiast, you have endorsed warm hand-offs (WHOs) as a beneficial part of the PCBH model. Or maybe you [...]

This document provides a summary of empirical studies on brief behavioral treatments for chronic pain. The studies included in the summary examined the effectiveness of different treatment approaches, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness, in reducing pain severity, pain interference, and pain catastrophizing. The results varied across the studies, with some showing significant improvements in pain outcomes, while others did not find significant differences between treatment groups. The limitations of the studies include small sample sizes, limited generalizability, and lack of control or comparison groups. Overall, the findings suggest that brief behavioral treatments may have potential benefits for managing chronic pain, but further research is needed to fully understand their effectiveness. [Extracted from the article]

It's not enough to be busy. The question is: what are we busy about?' --Henry David Thoreau Twenty years ago, I (Jodi Polaha) had a freshly minted PhD in Child [...]

Introduction: The Primary Care-Mental Health Integration program is a component of the Veterans Health Administration's patient-centered medical home, which emphasizes comprehensive, patient-centered care. One model of primary care-mental health integration, known as Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH), positions trained behavioral health providers as members of the primary care team. Whereas patient perspectives are essential to effective patient-centered care, little empirical information exists regarding patients' goals and priorities for addressing their biopsychosocial concerns in PCBH. Method: A regional mail survey of Veterans Health Administration patients was used. We collected data from 281 veterans (27% response rate) who received PCBH services in a northeastern region. Results: Respondents identified difficulty with sleep (80%), low energy/amotivation (78%), and managing stress (72%) as the most prevalent individual concerns, although the majority endorsed concerns in multiple domains of functioning. Overwhelmingly, patients who endorsed any biopsychosocial problem area reported that they did (53-93%) or would like to (56-81%) address that concern with a behavioral health provider. Respondents most frequently identified anger as a top priority for future care, followed by stress management, energy/motivation, and sleep disturbance. Whereas sample means signaled neutral or better quality of life in most individual domains, total Quality of Life Inventory scores suggested very low (32%) to average (30%) overall quality-of -life ratings for most participants. Discussion: In addition to symptom-focused PCBH assessments, providers should gather biopsychosocial data to identify and monitor functional and quality-of-life concerns and evaluate patient preferences in addressing these concerns over the course of clinical care. Keywords: biopsychosocial functioning, mental health, patient preferences, integrated primary care, veterans, The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has implemented a national Primary Care-Mental Health Integration program to support primary care personnel in addressing behavioral aspects of care through a population health approach [...]

Introduction: Measurement-based care (MBC) involves the systematic collection of data to inform clinical decision-making and monitor treatment outcomes. In addition to benefitting patients and providers, data on MBC implementation can also be used to inform quality improvement efforts within existing health care systems. Method: The method was retrospective chart review. We collected data on electronic mental health (MH) screens and symptom measures recorded by MH providers. Patients were 28,376 veterans who received MH services in a northeastern region. Results: Although rates varied by MH condition and clinic type, screening for alcohol misuse, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder appeared to occur with regularity. MH symptom measurement was less frequent than screening but included measures of alcohol and substance use, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and suicidal ideation. Patient demographics (e.g., age, military service era, sex, MH diagnosis) and frequency of clinic contact emerged as significant predictors of symptom measurement. Discussion: In this article, we illustrate how data on MH screening and measurement can be organized, analyzed, and interpreted to identify opportunities to enhance MBC practices in MH care. We conclude with a discussion of how large data set analyses can contribute to programmatic MBC initiatives.Keywords: integrated care, measurement-based care, mental healthSupplemental materials: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000379.supp, Measurement-based care (MBC) refers to the use of screening tools and outcome measures to identify the presence of prevalent conditions, monitor changes in symptoms over time, and guide treatment planning [...]

Introduction: Health care organizations are embracing integrated primary care (IPC), in which mental health and behavioral health are addressed as part of routine care within primary care settings. Behavioral medicine concerns, which include health behavior change and coping with medical conditions, are common in primary care populations. Although there are evidence-based behavioral interventions that target a variety of behavioral medicine concerns, integrated behavioral health providers need interventions that are sufficiently brief (i.e., [less than or equal to]6 appointments) to be compatible with IPC. Method: We conducted a literature review of published studies examining behavioral interventions that target prevalent behavioral medicine concerns and can feasibly be employed by IPC providers in adult primary care settings. Results: A total of 67 published articles representing 63 original studies met eligibility criteria. We extracted data on the behavioral interventions employed, results comparing the active intervention to a comparison group, general fit with IPC, and methodological quality. The vast majority of studies examined brief interventions targeting sleep difficulties and physical activity. The most commonly employed interventions were derived from cognitive-behavioral therapy and motivational interviewing. Outcomes were generally statistically significantly in favor of the active intervention relative to comparison, with highly variable methodological quality ratings (range = 0-5; M = 2.0). Discussion: Results are discussed in relation to the need for further evidence for brief behavioral interventions targeting other behavioral medicine concerns beyond sleep and physical activity, as well as for more specificity regarding the compatibility of such interventions with IPC practice. Keywords: primary care, behavioral medicine, intervention, brief, treatment, The field of behavioral medicine addresses the integration of 'psychosocial and biomedical knowledge to promote health, prevent disease, and manage illness' (Spring, 2011, p. 1), which encompasses treatment of mental [...]

Objective: Primary care behavioral health (PCBH) is a population-based approach to delivering mental and behavioral health care in the primary care setting. Implementation of the PCBH model varies across practice [...]

Introduction: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) Primary Care--Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI) program aims to increase availability and acceptability of mental health (MH) care by integrating these services into primary care. [...]

Obesity has been linked to increased risk of several malignancies, but the role of obesity in the etiology of ovarian cancer remains unclear. Therefore, a hospital-based case-control study was conducted to investigate the association between body size and risk of ovarian cancer. Participants included 427 women with primary, incident ovarian cancer and 854 cancer-free controls. All participants received medical services at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, NY between 1982 and 1998 and completed a comprehensive epidemiological questionnaire. The instrument included questions regarding height and usual wt prior to survey. Participants were classified as underweight/normal (BMI [less than or equal to] 24.9 kg/[m.sup.2]), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/[m.sup.2]), or obese (BMI [greater than or equal to] 30.0 kg/[m.sup.2]). Compared with underweight/normal participants, being overweight (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.02; 95% CI 0.77-1.36) or obese (adjusted OR = 1.17; 95% CI 0.84-1.65) was not significantly associated with an elevated risk of ovarian cancer. After stratification by menopausal status, BMI showed no significant association to ovarian cancer risk among postmenopausal women ([greater than or equal to] 50 y old). However, among premenpausal women (

Caffeine has been suggested as a possible risk factor for breast cancer, potentially through its effect of facilitating the development of benign breast disease. However, coffee and tea also contain polyphenols, which exhibit anticarcinogenic properties. A hospital-based, case-control study was conducted to evaluate the role of coffee, decaffeinated coffee, and black tea in breast cancer etiology. Study participants included 1932 cases with primary, incident breast cancer and 1895 hospital controls with nonneoplastic conditions. All participants completed a comprehensive epidemiological questionnaire. Among premenopausal women, consumption of regular coffee was associated with linear declines in breast cancer risk (P for trend = 0.03); consumers of [greater than or equal to] cups/d experienced a 40% risk reduction (odds ratio = 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.98). No clear associations between intake of black tea or decaffeinated coffee and breast cancer risk were noted among premenopausal women, although black tea was associated with a protective effect unique to a subsample of cases with lobular histology. Among postmenopausal women, breast cancer risk was not associated with consumption of coffee, tea, or decaffeinated coffee. Results among postmenopausal women did not differ by histologic subtype. Our findings support a protective effect of coffee intake on premenopausal, but not postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings. KEY WORDS: * breast neoplasms * coffee * tea * caffeine * case-control studies