Search

Mohammad I Fatani,1 Ibrahim Al-homood,2 Mohamed Bedaiwi,3 Sahar Al Natour,4 Alper Erdogan,5 Aya Alsharafi,5 Suzan M Attar6 1Department of Dermatology, Heraa Hospital, Mecca, Makkah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 2Department of Rheumatology, King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 3Department of Rheumatology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 4Department of Dermatology, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Eastern Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 5Eli Lilly and Company, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 6Department of Internal Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Makkah, Kingdom of Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Mohammad I Fatani, Department of Dermatology, Heraa Hospital, Al Madinah Al Munawarah Road, Mecca, Makkah, 24227, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Email m_fatani@yahoo.comPurpose: Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, immune-mediated skin disease that has significant impact on a patient’s quality of life, yet it remains challenging for dermatologists to successfully identify and manage. Without effective screening, diagnosis and treatments, psoriasis can potentially progress to psoriatic arthritis. A descriptive, observational cross-sectional study of Saudi Arabian dermatologists and patients with psoriasis was conducted to explore dermatologist and patient perspectives of psoriasis, including diagnosis, management, disease course and unmet needs.Patients and Methods: This study involved a quantitative questionnaire administered to 31 dermatologists and 90 patients with psoriasis at eight medical centers and was analyzed using descriptive statistics.Results: Dermatologists and patients perceived that psoriasis treatment was initiated promptly and that follow-up visits were sufficient. Their perspectives differed in the time to diagnosis and patient reaction, symptom severity, input into treatment goals and educational needs. The dermatologists’ concerns about underdiagnosed psoriasis (13%) were primarily related to patient awareness (87%), physician awareness (58%), and the absence of a regular screening program (52%). Only 31% of patients with psoriasis were highly satisfied with their psoriasis treatment, with 78% experiencing unpleasant symptoms of pain or swelling in joints indicative of psoriatic arthritis. However, only 56% of these patients reported these symptoms to their physicians. When dermatologists were made aware of this difference, referrals to a rheumatologist increased.Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of strengthening psoriasis management by enhancing dermatologist referral and screening practices, adopting a multidisciplinary approach to care, and improving education and resources for physicians and patients. These results can help to inform the improvement of psoriasis screening, diagnosis and treatment strategies and ensure that expectations meet treatment outcomes. Further research exploring the dermatologist and patient perspectives of the disease pathway from psoriasis to psoriatic arthritis and tailor-made treatment approaches is recommended.Keywords: autoimmune disease, disease pathway, patient satisfaction, provider perspective

Hanan Al Rayes,1 Hany Salah,2 Tharwat Hamad,3 Mohab Soliman,4 Mohamed Bedaiwi5 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2Therapeutic Area Lead Rheumatology, Intercontinental, AbbVie Biopharmaceuticals GmbH, Dubai, United Arab Emirates; 3Medical Manager, Immunology, AbbVie Biopharmaceuticals GmbH, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 4Medical Advisor, Rheumatology, AbbVie Biopharmaceuticals GmbH, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 5Division of Rheumatology, College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Hanan Al Rayes, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, 12233, Saudi Arabia, Tel +966505226824, Email Halrayes@hotmail.comAbstract: Spondylarthritis (SpA) is an umbrella term that encompasses a wide range of rheumatological disorders. Several studies demonstrated that SpA is associated with increased healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and a lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This review aimed to summarize the current literature regarding the multidimensional impact of SpA on HRQoL and HCRU in Saudi Arabia and explore the correlation of the extent of severity of SpA with HRQoL and HCRU. Although the prevalence of SpA varies across different populations and is correlated with HLA-B27 prevalence, the magnitude of SpA in the Saudi population has not been extensively evaluated. Few studies have investigated the impact of SpA on HRQoL and HCRU in Saudi Arabia and the Middle East. There is a need to study the cost-effectiveness of various SpA treatment strategies, including biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), to prioritize healthcare spending in the Saudi healthcare system. Data on SpA in Saudi Arabia and the Middle East region are mainly based on expert views, with few population-based studies compared to other regions. Therefore, there is an imperative need to develop high-quality, national-level epidemiological studies that assess the following: (1) more accurate estimates of the current prevalence of SpA in Saudi Arabia, including the prevalence of axial SpA and psoriatic arthritis; (2) the phenotypes/clinical characteristics of SpA, including disease severity and extra-articular involvement; (3) the impact of SpA on the HRQoL of the patients and the factors that can predict the extent of impaired HRQoL in such population, which can represent the first step in developing psychological interventions that should be personalized to this patient population; (4) the impact of implementing formal assessment of disease activity on the management of the patients and, subsequently, their HRQoL; and (5) the HCRU and costs for patients with SpA, and how treatment patterns can affect this cost.Keywords: spondylarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, health-related quality of life, healthcare resource utilization, Saudi Arabia

Haya Almalag,1 Hanan H Abouzaid,1 Lamya Alnaim,1 Jawza Albaqami,1 Rawan Al Shalhoub,1 Ibrahim Almaghlouth,2,3 Maha Dessougi,4 Amal Al Harthi,4 Mohamed Bedaiwi,2 Eman Alfi,5 Mohammed A Omair2 1Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 3College of Medicine Research Centre, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 4Rheumatology Department, Security Force Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 5Clinical Pharmacy Department, Pharmaceutical Services, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Haya Almalag Department of Clinical PharmacyCollege of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11149, Saudi ArabiaTel +966 118057859Email halmalaq@ksu.edu.saBackground: Methotrexate (MTX) Intolerance Severity Score (MISS) has been previously validated in the Arabic language and has helped to detect high levels of intolerance in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The aim of the current study was to evaluate patient and disease characteristics associated with a high risk of MTX intolerance.Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional interview-based survey was conducted using adult RA patients as a study group, who were visiting a specialized rheumatology clinic at King Saud University Medical City. The Arabic MISS was used in this survey. Statistical analyses were performed to understand associations between MTX-intolerant and MTX-tolerant patients.Results: A total of 117 patients were involved in this study. Of those, 101 (86.3%) were females with a mean (SD) disease duration of 6.6 (5.7) years. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) was 3.6 (3.6– 4.1). MTX intolerance was observed in 55 (47%) patients. The most predominant component in patients with a positive test was the behavioral component. Intolerant patients had a higher median of pain (47.3 vs. 50.0; P = 0.010) and patient global assessment (50.0 vs. 60.0; P = 0.004) scales compared to those in tolerant patients. Additionally, MTX intolerance was associated with the female gender (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 6.724; 95% CI 1.420, 31.843, P = 0.016), marital status (AOR 2.549; 95% CI 1.037, 6.270, P = 0.042) and DAS28 (AOR 1.612; 95% CI 1.032, 2.517, P = 0.036). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the remaining disease activity parameters, background therapies, seropositivity, and smoking status (P > 0.05).Conclusion: Patient characteristics, rather than disease activity, significantly impact MTX intolerance. Behavioral component is the main driver of intolerance. Intolerant patients have higher patient-reported outcomes. Qualitative studies are needed to explore causes and potential solutions to MTX intolerance.Keywords: methotrexate, rheumatoid arthritis, intolerance

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be described as a chronic, inflammatory, progressive, autoimmune disorder characterized by generalized inflammation of the synovial joints, which hereby triggers the progressive erosion of both cartilage and bone. Anakinra is a recombinant form of human IL-1 receptor antagonist which targets the type I IL-1 receptor. In the present systematic review, we intend to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse effects of interleukin-1 antagonists in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The database search was carried out using PubMed (Medline), Web of Science (Clarivate), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for the existing studies. A total of 3912 relevant articles were identified as per the search strategy. Out of them, 854 duplicate records and further 3024 records were excluded after going through their titles and abstracts. Further, out of 42 articles left, we excluded 32 more articles matching our inclusion criteria and excluding the reviews and case studies. Finally, we included 10 relevant studies that focused on both the effectiveness and adverse effects of interleukin-1 antagonists during the treatment of adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the present analysis. Nine out of 10 included studies are randomized trials (RCT) except for 1 study, which was an extension study. RESULTS: The results showed an ACR20 response at week 12 and were the most common primary outcome measure in the present review. Various secondary outcome measures studied were changed from baseline at week 24 in individual ACR components. ACR50 and ACR70 responses at subsequent weeks (12 and 24), ESR components, HAQ score, CRP levels, and ESR. Notably, more improvement was observed with anakinra in comparison to placebo for achieving ACR50 and ACR70 responses at 24 weeks. Premature withdrawal of participants was observed in almost all the studies. Adverse drug reactions were attributed to be the most common reason followed by loss of efficacy for withdrawal of patients from the treatment. The infectious episode was another common adverse effect observed in both anakinra and placebo groups. Some malignancies were also documented in the included researches of this systematic analysis. We observed a lower overall incidence of malignancies for the studies screened compared with that of the general population. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrated that anakinra is safe, effective, and well-tolerated, with no significant difference in adverse effects compared to placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To describe Spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients in a single center (preliminary phase), Build connections to establish local cohorts, Saudi Registry, and publication in Gulf and Arab database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective observational cohort consists of patients with spondylarthritis (SpA) diagnosed by a rheumatologist. Patients with AS were defined as those who met the modified New York criteria for Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) 1984. All other patients with axial SpA who did not meet the radiology criteria of modified New York criteria for Ankylosing Spondylitis were classified as having non-radiographic axial SpA based on Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) diagnostic criteria for axial spondyloarthropathy. RESULTS: The study group comprised 106 patients with SpA (49 patients with AS and 57 patients with non-radiographic axial SpA). Patients with non-radiographic axial SpA and patients with AS who had previously been treated with biologic disease-modifying drugs (DMARDs) were 66.67 percent and 83.67 percent, respectively. In patients with AS, CRP and age significantly impact disease activities (p<0.05). The overall mean ASDAS score was 2.3 ± 0.7. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown a more detailed description of the largest Saudi cohort reported yet. Interestingly, both disease groups, Ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic spondyloarthritis showed a lower prevalence of HLA-B27 is lower in the general Saudi population compared to other nations including Caucasians, thus, limiting its use as a diagnostic tool. The majority of both groups, nearly three-quarters of all patients (74.53%) in biologic DMARD treatment, and only (22.64%) used csDMARD treatment, which may help control disease activity and showing easier access and availability of these therapies to the patient. Patients with non-radiographic axial SpA showed slightly higher Extra-articular Manifestations comparing with AS patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mohammed A Omair, Sara A Alkhelb, Sadeen E Ezzat, Ayah M Boudal, Mohammed K Bedaiwi, Ibrahim Almaghlouth Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Mohammed A Omair, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Tel +966505270513, Email momair@ksu.edu.saAbstract: Many epidemiological studies have shown an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA and VTE share some background factors, such as increasing age, smoking, and obesity. At the same time, other VTE factors, such as knee replacement and oral contraceptive pills, occur commonly in RA patients. In addition, the chronic inflammatory state of RA might hypothetically lead to endothelial injury and a hypercoagulable state. Two critical pathophysiological pathways lead to VTE. Recently, concerns increased about the increased risk of VTE in patients using Janus Kinase inhibitors. This review aims at reviewing the risk of VTE in RA and the role of traditional risk factors and disease-related inflammation and develops a conceptual framework that describes the interaction between these factors.Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis, venous thromboembolism, Janus Kinase inhibitors

Gastrointestinal manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are common, occurring in about 50% of cases. They are usually mild, in the form of mouth ulcers, nausea, heartburn and mild abdominal pain, but they can be severe in cases of gastrointestinal vasculitis. In this report we describe an unusual combination of SLE complications, namely superior mesenteric artery syndrome (SMAS) and reversible acute obstructive renal failure. This was attributed to raised intra-abdominal pressure and hence intra-abdominal compartment syndrome (IACS) following weight loss secondary to an acute presentation of SLE with gastrointestinal vasculitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study examined the prevalence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among Saudi patients with SLE and the general population and considered factors associated with such outcomes were taken into consideration., Methods: This is a cohort study evaluating the period prevalence of MACE from 2020 to 2023. The study used two datasets, namely the Saudi national prospective cohort for SLE patients and the Prospective Urban-Rural Epidemiology Study Saudi subcohort (PURE-Saudi) for the general population. Participants in both studies were monitored using a standardised protocol. MACE was defined as myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or angina. The analysis was adjusted for demographics, traditional cardiovascular risk factors and SLE diagnosis through logistic regression models., Results: The PURE and national SLE cohorts comprised 488 and 746 patients, respectively. Patients with SLE from the SLE cohort were younger (40.7±12.5 vs 49.5±8.6 years) and predominantly female (90.6% vs 41.6%). The prevalence of traditional risk factors was greater in the PURE cohort compared with the SLE cohort. These factors included dyslipidaemia (28.9% vs 49.4%), obesity (63% vs 85%) and diabetes (7.8% vs 27.2%), but not hypertension (19.3% vs 18.8%). MACE (defined as MI or stroke or venous thromboembolism or heart failure) occurred more frequently in patients with SLE (4.3% vs 1.6%, p=0.004). Older age and lupus diagnosis were independently associated with MACE after adjusting for conventional risk factors. The odds of MACE were significantly related to age and lupus diagnosis (p=0.00 and p=0.00, respectively), but not cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (p=0.83)., Conclusion: Patients with SLE have a significantly higher risk of developing MACE than the general population. This risk is not well explained by traditional risk factors, which may explain the failure of CVD risk scores to stratify patients with SLE adequately. Further studies are needed to understand CVD risk's pathogenesis in SLE and mitigate it., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: The utilisation of telemedicine has been rapidly growing among patients with rheumatic diseases, especially following the corona virus disease 2019 pandemic. Ease and convenience appear to dominate the reasons for this growth. However, the effects of this approach in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are yet to be revealed. In this study, we examined the effect of telemedicine on disease activity assessment and damage scores in patients with SLE., Methods: This case-crossover study was nested within a national prospective cohort of patients with SLE in Saudi Arabia. Patients with SLE were included if they fulfilled the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria between March 2020 and March 2021 and were assessed at three time points with 3 months between assessments, according to the standardised protocol of this cohort. Telemedicine was conducted for the first evaluation, while in-person assessments were used at the second and third visits. The primary outcome was the difference in the SLE disease activity index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score. The primary analysis was conducted using the repeated measure model and adjusted for potential confounders, including demographics, medications, and changes in steroid doses. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to mitigate selection and time-varying confounders., Results: A total of 92 participants were included in this study. Most patients were females (88%), with a mean (±standard deviation [SD]) age of 36 (±13) years. The mean (±SD) disease activity scores at baseline were as follows: SLEDAI-2K, 5 (±5); SLE responder index, 3.8 (±3.5); Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index, 1 (±1). The mean difference in SLEDAI-2K score was -1.641 (95% confidence interval -2.773 to -0.510, p = 0.005*) between telemedicine and follow-up visits. The results were consistent in all sensitivity analyses., Conclusion: We found that telemedicine assessment was associated with a much higher disease activity score than subsequent assessments, which may suggest an overestimation of disease activity and later assessment accuracy. Cautious adoption has been suggested for SLE patients with active disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This post hoc analysis assessed tofacitinib efficacy on enthesitis by baseline location and severity, and impact on disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), in patients with PsA., Methods: Data were pooled from two phase 3 studies (NCT01877668/NCT01882439) in patients with PsA receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily to month (M)6 or placebo to M3. Endpoints were: change from baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) or Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Enthesitis Index (SPARCC); proportions of patients with enthesitis, relapsed enthesitis after resolution, de novo enthesitis, low disease activity (LDA) or remission (minimal disease activity/very low disease activity; Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score; Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis, and Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis); and PROs (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue [FACIT-F] total and arthritis pain Visual Analog Scale scores). Descriptive statistics were generated by visit and treatment. Change from baseline in PROs was evaluated by multivariate linear regression., Results: Seven hundred ten patients from two studies were included: 479 had LEI > 0; 545 had SPARCC > 0; and 136 had LEI = 0 and SPARCC = 0 at baseline. At baseline, among patients with LEI > 0 or SPARCC > 0, mean LEI and SPARCC across treatments and enthesitis locations/severities ranged from 1.0-4.4 and 1.3-9.4, respectively. Across several baseline enthesitis locations/severities, changes from baseline in LEI and SPARCC up to M3 were greater with tofacitinib (-2.0-0.4 and -3.5-0.2) vs placebo (-‍0.9-‍0.4 and -1.5-1.1). Enthesitis at M6 was more common in patients with greater baseline enthesitis severity. At M6, ≤ 40% of patients with baseline LEI > 0 or SPARCC > 0 whose enthesitis had resolved by M1/M3 experienced a relapse, and < 14% of patients with baseline LEI = 0 and SPARCC = 0 had de novo enthesitis. LDA/remission rates generally increased with tofacitinib over time. Baseline LEI location was significantly associated with change from baseline in arthritis pain score, while baseline SPARCC severity was significantly associated with change from baseline in FACIT-F total and arthritis pain scores., Conclusion: Tofacitinib treatment resulted in improvements in enthesitis in patients with PsA, regardless of baseline location or severity., Trial Registration: NCT01877668;NCT01882439., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Rheumatic diseases (RD) are chronic diseases that significantly affect the lives of patients. Assessing health outcomes through a patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) is essential for RD management. Moreover, these tend to be less favorable among individuals than among the rest of the population. This study aimed to compare PROMIS between RD patients and other patients. This cross sectional study was conducted in the year 2021. Information about patients with RD was obtained from the RD registry at King Saud University Medical City. Patients without RD were recruited from family medicine clinics. Patients were contacted electronically through WhatsApp© to complete the PROMIS surveys. We compared the individual PROMIS scores between the 2 groups using linear regression, adjusting for sex, nationality, marital status, education level, employment, family history of RD, income, and chronic comorbidities. There were 1024 individuals (512 with RD and 512 without RD). The most common RD was systemic lupus erythematosus (51.6%), followed by rheumatoid arthritis (44.3%). Individuals with RD reported significantly higher PROMIS T-scores for pain [β = 6.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.76, 7.71] and fatigue (β = 2.9; 95% CI = 1.37, 4.38) compared to those without RD. Moreover, RD individuals reported lower physical functioning (β = -5.4; 95% CI = -6.50, -4.24) and social interaction (β = -4.5; 95% CI = -5.73, -3.20). Patients with RD in Saudi Arabia, particularly those with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis, have significantly greater impairment in physical functioning and social interaction and report higher levels of fatigue and pain. Addressing and ameliorating these negative outcomes is necessary to improve quality of life., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a musculoskeletal disease that adversely affects physical mobility and quality of life. It is challenging to manage because of the heterogeneous nature of the symptoms and the current treatment options., Purpose: To explore the patient and rheumatologist perspectives of PsA to help improve understanding of the disease experience and improve disease management., Methods: A descriptive, observational cross-sectional study of Saudi Arabian dermatologists and rheumatologists and patients with psoriasis or PsA was conducted. Questionnaire data were collected from 31 dermatologists, 34 rheumatologists, 90 patients with psoriasis, and 98 patients with PsA and analysed using descriptive statistics. Here, data from rheumatologists and patients with PsA are presented., Results: The results revealed similarities and differences in the rheumatologist and patient perspectives of PsA. Rheumatologists and patients agreed on the impact that PsA had on patients' quality of life and that more education was needed. However, they differed on several aspects of disease management. Rheumatologists estimated the time to diagnosis as four times shorter than what patients experienced. Patients accepted their diagnosis more than rheumatologists perceived them to; rheumatologists perceived patients to be worried or fearful. Patients perceived joint pain as their most severe symptom, in contrast to rheumatologists, who presumed skin appearance was the most severe symptom. Reported input into PsA treatment goals differed significantly. More than half of the rheumatologists reported equal patient-physician input into goal development as opposed to <10% of patients reporting the same. Almost half of patients reported no input into the development of their treatment goals., Conclusion: The management of PsA could benefit from enhanced screening and re-evaluation of what PsA outcomes have the most value to patients and rheumatologists. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended with increased patient involvement in disease management and individualized treatment options., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Axial spondyloarthritis is a chronic inflammatory disorder that primarily involves the axial skeleton (sacroiliac joints and spine), causing stiffness, severe pain and fatigue. In some patients, definitive structural damage of sacroiliac joints is visible on imaging and is known as radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Some patients do not have a clear radiographic damage of the sacroiliac joints, and this subtype is known as non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Early diagnosis is important for reducing the risk of irreversible structural damage and disability. Management of axial spondyloarthritis is challenging in Saudi Arabia because of inadequate disease knowledge and the unavailability of local guidelines. Therefore, this expert consensus is intended to provide recommendations, including the referral pathway, the definition of remission and the treat-to-target approach, to all healthcare professionals for the management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis. A Delphi technique of consensus was developed by involving an expert panel of 10 rheumatologists, 1 dermatologist and 1 general physician. The experts offered consensus-based recommendations based on a review of available scientific evidence and clinical experience for the referral, screening and management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis., (© 2022. International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a highly heterogeneous disease with complex manifestations. Limited understanding of the disease and non-availability of local guidelines pose challenges in the management of PsA in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, this expert consensus is aimed to provide recommendations on the management of patients with PsA, including referral pathway, definition of remission and treat-to-target (T2T) approach. A Delphi technique of consensus development was used involving an expert panel comprised of 10 rheumatologists, one dermatologist and one family physician. Based on the review of available published evidence and the opinions of clinical experts, key recommendations were developed. A consensus was achieved in defining the following: management guideline adaptable for Saudi Arabia, most useful screening tool, laboratory investigations, imaging tests and criteria for referring suspected PsA patients to a rheumatologist. In addition, an agreement was achieved in defining the T2T strategy and remission for the clinical management of PsA. Overall, these recommendations provide an evidence-based framework for the management of PsA patients in Saudi Arabia., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Abstract: Systemic Lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic multisystem, multifactorial inflammatory autoimmune disease. The SLE patients have 3 times increased risk of mortality based on international data with ethnicity playing an important impact on patients' morbidity and mortality. Descriptive studies from Saudi Arabia showed variation in clinical features from one region to another. Moreover, reliable inference from these studies is limited by study methodology and lack of translational data using biological samples to understand clinical phenotypes of Saudi SLE patients.The aim of this report is to describe the prospective study protocol of the National Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Cohort in Saudi Arabia. The purpose of this cohort study is multifold: first, to examine clinical characteristics and molecular phenotypes of Saudi SLE patients in relation to local environment and practices/lifestyles; second, to assess long-term outcomes of SLE in Saudi population and factors that influence favorable outcomes; third, to compare the effectiveness of various treatment regimens in Saudi SLE population.This study is a longitudinal prospective cohort study of adult, Saudi SLE patients using open cohort study design. Primary outcomes include disease-related outcomes (activity, improvement, and organ damage) and patient-reported outcomes (quality of life). Secondary outcomes include physiological and molecular modifications associated with changes in disease activity states.Results and analysis are in on-going study.This study provides a source of reliable data for clinical and translational research. This will allow us to have a holistic approach to SLE pathogenesis especially in Saudi population and may take us a step further toward much more personalized medicine.This protocol has been registered in NIH ClinicalTrial.gov (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT04604990) on October 27, 2020., Competing Interests: The study received a start-up fund from College of Medicine Research Centre (College of Medicine Research Centre-20-02), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on July 5, 2020. Support did not play any role in the design of the study and did not pose any conflict of interest. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

The management of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is challenging worldwide, and the particular challenges shared by North Africa and the Middle East are mainly related to early diagnosis and standardized management. We believe there are several reasons for these challenges, including: (a) limited awareness of the disease manifestations and prevalence in the region among physicians; (b) the concept of nonradiographic axSpA, while accepted with some difficulty by the rheumatology community, may not be well understood by the referring primary care physicians; (c) access to, and training in magnetic resonance imaging varies greatly between countries in the North Africa and Middle East region, and this may have a large impact on early diagnosis; (d) country-specific treatment guidelines are unavailable; and (e) economic and cultural factors influence patients' attempts to seek and continue treatment. In this review, we will discuss the prevalence of axSpA in North Africa and the Middle East, as well as the challenges to diagnose and treat patients in this region. As rheumatologists practicing in North Africa and the Middle East, we also provide suggestions to assist physicians, other healthcare professionals, and researchers in facilitating early, accurate diagnosis and treatment of axSpA., (© 2020 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, inflammatory arthropathy occurring in up to 30% of patients with psoriasis, and is characterized by multiple manifestations including peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, spondylitis, and psoriatic skin and nail disease. This complex and heterogeneous disease is poorly understood and its diagnosis and treatment are suboptimal, particularly in Africa and the Middle East, where very few studies into the impact of PsA have been carried out. This article aims to highlight the disease burden of PsA in the region as well as to identify unmet clinical needs. A non-systematic review was carried out in the PubMed database and the most relevant publications were selected. Expert rheumatologists practicing in Africa and the Middle East provide an insight into the challenges of treating PsA in daily practice, along with recommendations for improvements.

Objective: To compare the antero-posterior (AP) pelvis view with the Ferguson view of the SI joint in order to resolve whether one modality has a clear advantage for grading of sacroiliitis., Methods: One hundred and nine patients fulfilling Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria for axial spondyloarthritis who had AP pelvis and Ferguson views on the same day were identified from an axial spondyloarthritis clinic registry. Two rheumatologists independently scored the AP pelvis and Ferguson views according to modified New York (NY) criteria. Intra- and inter-reader agreements were obtained for both evaluations by using the kappa statistic and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Any change in diagnostic category dictated by the Ferguson vs the AP pelvis views was also evaluated., Results: A total of 266 radiographs were read from 109 patients. Intra-observer reliability of the observers showed similar ICC scores; this was also reflected in the kappa for diagnosis of AS fulfilling modified NY criteria between the observers. The inter-rater agreement showed similar kappa values between the two modalities. When separately evaluating SI joints with score grading of 0-2, grade 2 showed the lowest kappa, reaching a low of 0.1 and 0.19 for the right SI joint for Ferguson and AP pelvis views, respectively. Both modalities were concordant diagnostically; reclassification from AS to non-AS and vice versa was in the range 5-11%., Conclusion: There was general agreement between the Ferguson and AP pelvis X-ray ICC and kappa scores. Either modality can be employed to evaluate the SI joint for sacroiliitis with the Ferguson view showing no clear superiority over the standard AP pelvis view., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com)

Objective: In this study, we aimed to address the prevalence of fatigue, its associated factors, and the effect of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) on this subgroup of patients in a large axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) cohort., Methods: The study included 681 patients [ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and nonradiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA)]. The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Bath AS Disease Activity Index question 1 (BASDAI Q1) indices were used for fatigue assessment. Severe fatigue was defined as an FSS ≥ 4 or a BASDAI Q1 ≥ 5. Disease activity, function, and quality of life (QoL) measures were recorded. Patients who had been treated with TNFi were identified, and baseline and followup data were analyzed., Results: Of the cohort, 67.3% had severe fatigue, and the prevalence was similar between AS (67.2%) and nr-axSpA (68.2%). Severely fatigued patients tended to have higher disease activity scores, increased acute-phase proteins, and decreased QoL measures. TNFi therapy was associated with improvement in disease activity, and although this treatment led to significantly decreased fatigue scores, this reduction was not optimal in the majority of patients with 80% continuing to have severe fatigue according to their posttreatment scores. Health Assessment Questionnaire, mean scores of BASDAI Q5 and Q6, and BASDAI enthesitis were independent predictors of fatigue severity., Conclusion: Fatigue is a common symptom in axSpA, and the burden of fatigue among patients with nr-axSpA is similar to that seen in AS. While biologics are effective in improving disease activity, their effect on fatigue is more limited. In axSpA, fatigue remains unresponsive to TNFi in nearly 80% of patients.