Search

Brian B Johnson, Abigail I Franco, Lisa A Beck, James C Prezzano Department of Dermatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA Abstract: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic, relapsing–remitting inflammatory disease that can be challenging to treat. Patients with mild disease are usually managed well with good skin care practices including moisturization and appropriate bathing along with intermittent use of topical therapies such as topical corticosteroids and/or topical calcineurin inhibitors during flares. Patients with frequent flares may benefit from proactive application of topical therapies twice a week to the most troublesome areas. Patients with severe disease often present significant treatment challenges. Systemic therapies are usually required for severe AD but have varying degrees of success and can be associated with side-effect profiles that require counseling and close monitoring. Phototherapy has been shown to have success in treating moderate-to-severe AD, but several factors can limit its utility and efficacy including cost and access. New therapies are in development targeting specific pathways relevant for AD. Dupilumab was the first biologic treatment approved in North America, Europe, and Japan for adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Although this treatment can lead to rapid improvement in the majority of patients, there are inadequate responders. In this review, we discuss the clinical challenges and treatment options for moderate-to-severe refractory AD. Keywords: atopic dermatitis, eczema, treatment resistance, topical therapy, systemic therapy, biologics

Goals Of Work: Cancer causes functional problems that are often neither detected nor treated in the outpatient setting. Patient-physician communication regarding functional issues may contribute. This study was conducted to quantify the degree of concordance between patient-identified functional problems and their documentation in the oncology-generated medical record.Materials and Methods: We administered a 27-item questionnaire addressing cancer-related symptoms, signs, and functional problems to a consecutive sample of 244 patients undergoing outpatient cancer treatment. Oncology clinician-generated notation in the electronic medical record (EMR) was systematically reviewed for documentation of the instrument items. EMR review began the day of instrument completion and extended retrospectively for 6 months.Main Results: Eighty-three percent (202) completed the survey with at least one cancer-related symptom, sign, or functional problem identified by 71.8%, 33.2% and 65.8% of patients, respectively. Difficulty with ambulation (23.9%) and balance (19.4%) were the most frequent functional problems. Clinician notes referred to 49% of patients' symptoms, but only 37% of their signs and 6% of their functional problems. Pain, weight loss, and nausea (ORs > 4.9, p < 0.004) were most likely to be documented while functional problems (OR 0.2, p < 0.0001) were the least likely to be noted. Two rehabilitation physician referrals were generated for pain and limb swelling, but no functional problems were formally addressed.Conclusion: Functional problems are prevalent among outpatients with cancer and are rarely documented by oncology clinicians. A more aggressive search for, and treatment of, these problems may be beneficial for outpatients with cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the hospital length of stay in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with unspecified chest pain who were admitted through the ED to an inpatient bed prior to the initiation of the emergency department observation unit (EDOBS) and compare those patients admitted after the implementation of the EDOBS. Method: A retrospective, randomized descriptive study using chart review was performed at a large hospital system in the metropolitan Detroit region. Charts with an admission [International Classification of Diseases-9 Code 786.5, unspecified chest pain (n = 92)] were randomly selected. Results: For the inpatient group, ED registration time to unit was 6.4 hr and time from the unit to discharge was 80 hr (i.e., 3.3 days). For the EDOBS group, ED registration time to unit was 3.5 hr and time from EDOBS to discharge was 16 hr (i.e., 0.67 days). Length of stay decreased by 2.7 days overall. Conclusions: Using EDOBS for patients with unspecified chest pain provides for prompt and complete cardiac evaluation. Furthermore, the utilization of the emergency nurse practitioner helped alleviate the increased workload placed on the ED physicians in this type of unit. For example, the emergency nurse practitioner facilitated consults, reviewed diagnostic and laboratory findings (e.g., serial cardiac enzymes), and expedited hospital admission or discharge from the EDOBS. Study Limitations: Study limitations included a small random selection sample from one institution. Data collection was limited to review of the medical record and the accuracy of documentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past decade, clinical trials have shown that spinal cord stimulation can restore motor functions that were thought to be permanently impaired in persons with spinal cord injury. However, the off-target effects of delivering electrical impulses to intertwined spinal networks remain largely unknown. This generates safety concerns for this otherwise fast-progressing technology. Herein, we present the prevalence of autonomic dysreflexia (AD) that occurred during implanted spinal cord stimulation testing for motor activation of the lower extremities. Eleven participants with spinal cord injury underwent implantation of temporary percutaneous epidural and dorsal root ganglia stimulation leads. Participants completed two days of parameter testing at baseline, then six days of motor rehabilitation sessions, and two days of parameter testing at end of study. The goal of parameter testing was to determine electrode configuration(s), pulse amplitudes, and frequencies that activated lumbosacral spinal sensorimotor networks that generate lower extremity functions. During all parameter testing sessions, continuous blood pressure and heart rate monitoring recordings were collected. Evidence of autonomic dysreflexia was found in 22% of all parameter tests with participants at rest. Most of these episodes (97%) were asymptomatic. These episodes occurred more frequently when using epidural stimulation, at or near amplitudes that elicited whole leg muscle activation and using a wide-field electrode configuration. Although monitoring occurred during passive testing, motor rehabilitation sessions use stimulation for longer periods, at higher frequencies and amplitudes. These sessions may carry additional risks of autonomic dysreflexia. Investigation of these concerns should continue as spinal cord stimulation progresses toward clinical translation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Spinal cord stimulation for motor recovery after spinal cord injury is a popular research intervention, though off-target effects are a concern. Using continual blood pressure and heart rate recordings during passive spinal cord stimulation parameter testing, we identified frequent episodes of autonomic dysreflexia that were rarely associated with symptoms. This presents a previously unrecognized risk of spinal cord stimulation and appropriate vigilance in targeted monitoring is urged to maintain participant safety.

Background: The benefits and harms of adding antileukotrienes to H 1 antihistamines (AHs) for the management of urticaria (hives, itch, and/or angioedema) remain unclear., Objective: We sought to systematically synthesize the treatment outcomes of antileukotrienes in combination with AHs versus AHs alone for acute and chronic urticaria., Methods: As part of updating American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters urticaria guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, Central, LILACS, WPRIM, IBECS, ICTRP, CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, US Food and Drug Administration, and European Medicines Agency databases from inception to December 18, 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating antileukotrienes and AHs versus AHs alone in patients with urticaria. Paired reviewers independently screened citations, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random effects models pooled effect estimates for urticaria activity, itch, wheal, sleep, quality of life, and harms. The GRADE approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. The study was registered at the Open Science Framework (osf.io/h2bfx/)., Results: Thirty-four RCTs enrolled 3324 children and adults. Compared to AHs alone, the combination of a leukotriene receptor antagonist with AHs probably modestly reduces urticaria activity (mean difference, -5.04; 95% confidence interval, -6.36 to -3.71; 7-day urticaria activity score) with moderate certainty. We made similar findings for itch and wheal severity as well as quality of life. Adverse events were probably not different between groups (moderate certainty); however, no RCT reported on neuropsychiatric adverse events., Conclusion: Among patients with urticaria, adding leukotriene receptor antagonists to AHs probably modestly improves urticaria activity with little to no increase in overall adverse events. The added risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events in this population with leukotriene receptor antagonists is small and uncertain., Competing Interests: Disclosure statement This work was commissioned and funded by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI) and the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI) through the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters to inform upcoming guidance on the management of CU. The task force contributed to defining the scope of the review but otherwise had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, or data interpretation. The funder received a copy of the report before submission. The review team had the ability, but not the obligation, to consider the funders’ feedback. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: M. Ben-Shoshan reports consulting fees from Sanofi/Regeneron and Novartis. S. Waserman reports consulting fees from Medexus Pharmaceuticals and Miravo Healthcare. S. K. Mathur reports consulting fees from Novartis. E. T. Oliver reports consulting fees from Novartis and Sanofi/Regeneron. R. N. Asiniwasis reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Medexus Pharmaceuticals. S. Eftekhari is employed by the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, a nonprofit patient organization, which has received grants for patient education and unbranded initiatives from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, and Sanofi/Regeneron. T. Winders reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Merek, Novartis, and Sanofi/Regeneron. J. Bernstein reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Merck, Sanofi/Regeneron, and Pfizer; and leadership role in the AAAAI and the US Hereditary Angioedema Association. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Topical corticosteroids are widely used as a treatment for itch and wheals (urticaria), but their benefits and harms are unclear., Objective: To systematically synthesize the benefits and harms of topical corticosteroids for the treatment of urticaria., Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from database inception to March 23, 2024, for randomized trials comparing topical corticosteroids with placebo for patients with urticaria (either chronic spontaneous or inducible urticaria or acute urticaria elicited from skin/intradermal allergy testing). Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analyses addressed urticaria severity, itch severity (numeric rating scale; range 0-10; higher is worse), and adverse events. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023455182., Results: A total of 19 randomized controlled trials enrolled 379 participants with a median of mean age of 30.1 (range 21.1-44.0) years. Compared with placebo, topical corticosteroids may reduce wheal size (ratio of means 0.47, 95% CI 0.38-0.59; low certainty) and itch severity (mean difference -1.30, 95% CI -5.07 to 2.46; very low certainty). Topical corticosteroids result in little to no difference in overall adverse events (94 fewer patients per 1000, 95% credible intervals 172 fewer to 12 more; high certainty)., Conclusion: Compared with placebo, topical corticosteroids may result in a reduction of wheal size and little to no difference in overall adverse events. Topical corticosteroids may reduce itch severity, but the evidence is very uncertain. Future large, randomized trials addressing the use of topical corticosteroids would further support optimal urticaria management., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin condition characterized by widely variable cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus abundance that contributes to disease severity and rapidly responds to type 2 immune blockade (ie, dupilumab). The molecular mechanisms regulating S aureus levels between AD subjects remain poorly understood., Objective: We investigated host genes that may be predictive of S aureus abundance and correspond with AD severity., Methods: We studied data derived from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-funded (NCT03389893 [ADRN-09]) randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study of dupilumab in adults (n = 71 subjects) with moderate-to-severe AD. Bulk RNA sequencing of skin biopsy samples (n = 57 lesional, 55 nonlesional) was compared to epidermal S aureus abundance, lipidomic, and AD clinical measures., Results: S aureus abundance and ceramide synthase 1 (CERS1) expression positively correlated at baseline across both nonlesional (r = 0.29, P = .030) and lesional (r = 0.41, P = .0015) skin. Lesional CERS1 expression also positively correlated with AD severity (ie, SCORAD r = 0.44, P = .0006) and skin barrier dysfunction (transepidermal water loss area under the curve r = 0.31, P = .025) at baseline. CERS1 expression (forms C 18:0 sphingolipids) was negatively associated with elongation of very long-chain fatty acids (ELOVL6; C 16:0 →C 18:0 ) expression and corresponded with a shorter chain length sphingolipid composition. Dupilumab rapidly reduced CERS1 expression (day 7) and ablated the relationship with S aureus abundance and ELOVL6 expression by day 21., Conclusion: CERS1 is a unique molecular biomarker of S aureus abundance and AD severity that may contribute to dysfunctional skin barrier and shorter-chain sphingolipid composition through fatty acid sequestration as a maladaptive compensatory response to reduced ELOVL6., Competing Interests: Disclosure statement Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), including T32GM007356 (to H.M.K.), F30AG076326 (H.M.K.), U19AI117673 (Atopic Dermatitis Research Network [ADRN] investigators), UM1AI151958 (ADRN investigators), UM2AI117870 (Rho Inc), and UM1TR004399 (University of Colorado investigators). This article’s contents are the authors’ sole responsibility and do not necessarily represent official NIH views. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: L. A. Beck has been consultant for Allakos, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Dermavent, DermTech, Evelo Biosciences, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Nektar Therapeutics, Numab Therapeutics, Pfizer, Rapt Therapeutics, Regeneron, Ribon Therapeutics, Sanofi/Genzyme, Sanofi-Aventis, Stealth BioTherapeutics, Trevi Therapeutics, Union Therapeutics, and Xencor; and investigator for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, DermTech, Kiniksa, Pfizer, Regeneron, Ribon Therapeutics, and Sanofi. M. Boguniewicz has been investigator and advisory board member for Regeneron and Sanofi. Z. C. Chiesa Fuxench has received research grants from Lilly, Brexogen, LEO Pharma, Regeneron, Sanofi, Tioga, and Vanda for work related to atopic dermatitis, and from Menlo Therapeutics and Galderma for work related to prurigo nodularis; has served as consultant for the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, National Eczema Association, AbbVie, Incyte, and Pfizer; and received honoraria for continuing medical education work in atopic dermatitis sponsored by education grants from Regeneron/Sanofi and Pfizer and from Beirsdorf for work related to skin cancer and sun protection. A. De Benedetto has been a consultant for AbbVie, Incyte, and Sanofi-Advent; and has received grant or clinical trial support paid to institution from Incyte and Pfizer. D. Y. M. Leung reports grants to his institution from National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Genentech, and Sanofi; and personal consulting fees from Sanofi, Jasper Therapeutics, and Leo Pharma. P. Y. Ong has been on advisory boards for Dermavant, Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, and AbbVie; and has received research funding from Incyte, Leo, Regeneron, and Sanofi. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To highlight common mechanistic targets for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) and IgE-mediated food allergy (IgE-FA) with potential to be effective for both diseases and prevent atopic progression., Data Sources: Data sources were PubMed searches or National Clinical Trials (NCT)-registered clinical trials related to AD, IgE-FA, and other atopic conditions, especially focused on the pediatric population., Study Selections: Human seminal studies and/or articles published in the past decade were emphasized with reference to preclinical models when relevant. NCT-registered clinical trials were filtered by inclusion of pediatric subjects younger than 18 years with special focus on children younger than 12 years as a critical period when AD and IgE-FA diseases may often be concurrent., Results: AD and IgE-FA share several pathophysiologic features, including epithelial barrier dysfunction, innate and adaptive immune abnormalities, and microbial dysbiosis, which may be critical for the clinical progression between these diseases. Revolutionary advances in targeted biologic therapies have shown the benefit of inhibiting type 2 immune responses, using dupilumab (anti-interleukin-4Rα) or omalizumab (anti-IgE), to potentially reduce symptom burden for both diseases in pediatric populations. Although the potential for biologics to promote disease remission (AD) or sustained unresponsiveness (IgE-FA) remains unclear, the refinement of biomarkers to predict infants at risk for atopic disorders provides promise for prevention through timely intervention., Conclusion: AD and IgE-FA exhibit common features that may be leveraged to develop biologic therapeutic strategies to treat both conditions and even prevent atopic progression. Future studies should be designed with consistent age stratification in the pediatric population and standardized regimens of adjuvant oral immunotherapy or dose escalation (IgE-FA) to improve cross-study interpretation., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to quantify changes in performance of task-specific motor activities over 12 motor rehabilitation sessions with lumbosacral spinal cord stimulation (SCS) via either transcutaneous stimulation or epidural stimulation. Both stimulation modalities have been used in recent years to restore functions lost to spinal cord injury (SCI). Secondary outcomes examine participants' perspectives captured via the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) upon study completion to further understand their perception of SCS., Methods: Six individuals with SCI completed 12 sessions with one modality of SCS during supine and/or side-lying, seated forward reaching, and standing activities. Changes in volitional lower extremity movement, the number of points of contact needed at hips and/or knees to facilitate standing, and changes in seated forward reaching distance were used to quantify performance. The UEQ was administered to gauge participants' perspectives following use of SCS to enable functions impaired due to SCI., Results: For all participants, performance of motor activities improved with SCS compared to without stimulation. Responses for the UEQ showed an overall positive perception of trialing SCS with rehabilitation to enhance motor functions impaired by SCI., Conclusions: Regardless of injury severity, location of injury, time since SCI, or SCS modality, all participants experienced gains in motor function in the presence of SCS combined with a condensed rehabilitation program. However, no evidence of sustained motor functions was found in the absence of SCS. UEQ results highlight the positive perception of SCS with rehabilitation as well as the importance of consulting persons with lived experience of SCS during clinical trial design and protocol development. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05095454.

Background: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) often have elevated type 2 inflammatory serum biomarkers., Objective: The aim was to report changes in thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC)/CC chemokine ligand 17 (CCL17), total IgE, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and eosinophils in pediatric patients treated with dupilumab or placebo., Methods: Biomarker data were analyzed from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies of patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients ages 6 months to 5 years were randomly assigned to weight-dependent dupilumab 200/300 mg every 4 weeks (q4w) or placebo; ages 6 to 11 years, to dupilumab 100/200 mg every 2 weeks (q2w), dupilumab 300 mg q4w, or placebo; ages 12 to 17 years, to dupilumab 200/300 mg q2w, dupilumab 300 mg q4w, or placebo. In the youngest 2 groups, topical corticosteroids were also applied. Median percent changes from baseline to week 16 were reported using last observation carried forward analysis, censoring after rescue treatment., Results: Pediatric patients who received dupilumab versus placebo achieved significantly greater median percent reductions at week 16 in TARC/CCL17 (-83.3% to -72.4% vs -14.9% to -1.8%), total IgE (-71.2% to -58.4% vs -21.0% to +28.1%), and LDH (-26.2% to -9.8% vs -1.5% to +1.5%). All comparisons were significantly different (P < .0001) between each dupilumab dosing group and respective placebo groups. In contrast, absolute changes in eosinophils were small in all groups., Conclusions: Dupilumab treatment for pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe AD significantly reduced levels of TARC/CCL17, total IgE, and LDH to levels comparable with those of healthy controls, reflecting a reduction in systemic type 2 and general inflammation., Competing Interests: Disclosure statement This research was sponsored by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: L. A. Beck is a consultant for AbbVie, Allakos, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Aslan Pharma, Astria Therapeutics, Celldex, Dermavent, DermTech, Escient Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Evelo Biosciences, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Nektar Therapeutics, Numab Therapeutics, Pfizer, Proteologix, RAPT Therapeutics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ribon Therapeutics, Sanofi/Genzyme, Sanofi-Aventis, Sitryx Therapeutics, Stealth BioTherapeutics, Trevi Therapeutics, Union Therapeutics, Xencor, and Yuhan and an investigator for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, DermTech, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Ribon Therapeutics, and Sanofi. A. Muraro is a member of advisory boards and speaker for Aimmune Therapeutics, DVB Technologies, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Sanofi, and Viatris. M. Boguniewicz is a recipient of research grants and member of advisory boards for Incyte, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, and Sanofi and a member of advisory boards for AbbVie, Amgen, Dermavant, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, LEO Pharma, and Pfizer. Z. Chen and J. Zahn are employees and shareholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. A. Rodríguez Marco is an employee of Sanofi and may hold stock and/or stock options in the company., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Importance: Moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that often requires continuous long-term systemic management. Long-term safety and efficacy data for treatment options are critically important., Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment for up to 5 years in adults with moderate to severe AD., Design, Setting, and Participants: The 5-year LIBERTY AD open-label extension study was conducted from September 2013 to June 2022 at 550 sites in 28 countries. The study enrolled adult patients with moderate to severe AD who had participated in previous dupilumab clinical trials. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to February 2023., Exposures: At enrollment, patients initiated a regimen of subcutaneous dupilumab, 200 mg, weekly (400-mg loading dose). The regimen was amended in June 2014 to dupilumab, 300 mg, weekly (600-mg loading dose) based on a dose-ranging study and again in November 2019 to dupilumab, 300 mg, every 2 weeks to align with the regulatory regimen approvals., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were the incidence and rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Key secondary end points included incidence and rate of serious TEAEs and adverse events of special interest, proportion of patients achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear), and proportion of patients with 75% or more improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) from the parent study baseline., Results: A total of 2677 patients were enrolled and treated in the open-label extension study; 1611 (60.2%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 39.2 (13.4) years. A total of 334 patients (12.5%) completed treatment up to week 260. The most common reasons for withdrawal were due to regulatory approval of dupilumab in compliance with the study protocol (810 of 1380 [58.7%]), patient withdrawal (248 of 1380 [18.0%]), and adverse events (116 of 1380 [8.4%]). Exposure-adjusted rates of TEAEs were generally stable or declined throughout the study. Common TEAEs (incidence of 5% or greater) included nasopharyngitis, worsening AD, upper respiratory tract infection, conjunctivitis, conjunctivitis allergic, headache, oral herpes, and injection-site reaction. At week 260, 220 of 326 patients (67.5%) achieved an IGA score of 0 or 1 and 288 of 324 (88.9%) achieved 75% or greater improvement in the EASI. The mean (SD) EASI score was 16.39 (14.60) at baseline and 2.75 (5.62) at end of study., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, there was sustained safety and efficacy of continuous long-term dupilumab treatment for adults with moderate to severe AD.

Background: Short courses of adjunctive systemic corticosteroids are commonly used to treat acute urticaria and chronic urticaria flares (both with and without mast cell-mediated angioedema), but their benefits and harms are unclear., Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of treating acute urticaria or chronic urticaria flares with versus without systemic corticosteroids., Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, and CBM databases from inception to July 8, 2023, for randomized controlled trials of treating urticaria with versus without systemic corticosteroids. Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and appraised risk of bias with the Cochrane 2.0 tool. We performed random-effects meta-analyses of urticaria activity, itch severity, and adverse events. We assessed certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach., Results: We identified 12 randomized trials enrolling 944 patients. For patients with low or moderate probability (17.5%-64%) to improve with antihistamines alone, add-on systemic corticosteroids likely improve urticaria activity by a 14% to 15% absolute difference (odds ratio [OR], 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-3.31; number needed to treat [NNT], 7; moderate certainty). Among patients with a high chance (95.8%) for urticaria to improve with antihistamines alone, add-on systemic corticosteroids likely improved urticaria activity by a 2.2% absolute difference (NNT, 45; moderate certainty). Corticosteroids may improve itch severity (OR, 2.44; 95% CI: 0.87-6.83; risk difference, 9%; NNT, 11; low certainty). Systemic corticosteroids also likely increase adverse events (OR, 2.76; 95% CI: 1.00-7.62; risk difference, 15%; number needed to harm, 9; moderate certainty)., Conclusions: Systemic corticosteroids for acute urticaria or chronic urticaria exacerbations likely improve urticaria, depending on antihistamine responsiveness, but also likely increase adverse effects in approximately 15% more., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease that affects 20% of children worldwide and is associated with low patient-reported quality of life (QoL). Crisaborole (CRIS) and tacrolimus 0.03% (TAC) are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved topical treatments for mild to moderate AD with similar clinical efficacy. Utilization of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may provide meaningful data on the impact of AD treatments on patients and caregivers. This study used PROs to monitor the impact of crisaborole (CRIS) and tacrolimus 0.03% (TAC) on children with mild/moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) and caregiver burden., Methods: This open-label study randomized 47 child-caregiver dyads to CRIS or TAC for 12 weeks. Disease severity, child quality of life (QoL), itch, pain interference, anxiety, depression, sleep, caregiver burden and caregiver QoL were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks., Results: A total of 36 dyads completed the study. Children (mean age = 8.0 ± 3.9 years) had mild baseline AD and were diverse by race (39% white; 36% Black) and gender (53% males). Caregivers were mostly female (78%; mean age = 37 ± 7.6 years). Both arms improved disease severity (Eczema Area and Severity Index) from baseline to 12 weeks (CRIS = -2.4 vs. TAC = -1.9). Within-arm analyses comparing baseline to 12 weeks revealed TAC, but not CRIS, improved all child and caregiver PROs except sleep (all p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that topical treatment for 12 weeks was more beneficial than 6 weeks, with TAC improving more PROs than CRIS. Future trials should implement PROs to fully understand the impact of AD treatments., (© 2024 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Objectives: Despite evidence for the validity of using client-led outcome measures in gender-affirming voice training (GAVT), the existing body of research on voice feminization relies heavily on acoustic-perceptual measures without additional qualitative exploration of client experience. Additionally, the authors are not aware of any existing studies prompting client input on the voice feminization methods they find most helpful in achieving their voice goals. The current study focuses on crucial client perceptions of GAVT for voice feminization and identifies the methods clients find most helpful., Methods: Using a mixed-methods approach, we gathered numeric and qualitative survey data from 21 individuals who engaged in GAVT supporting voice feminization. We conducted follow-up interviews with five survey participants to gather additional qualitative data on client experiences and perceptions of GAVT., Results: Quantitative and qualitative data reveal that clients are satisfied with GAVT supporting voice feminization, perceive their clinicians as being culturally inclusive, and identify oral/forward resonance work as one of the most helpful voice training methods. Interestingly, however, frequency of work on oral/forward resonance during training did not predict voice satisfaction post-training., Conclusions: Clients identified oral/forward resonance as one of the most helpful methods of voice feminization and found their GAVT experiences to be supportive of their voice goals. These findings emphasize the importance and value of client-led outcome measures when investigating effective approaches to GAVT., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The first and third authors of this study declare a professional involvement in providing gender-affirming voice services to three of the study participants. This disclosure is made to ensure transparency and acknowledge our role in supporting individuals in their journey towards gender affirmation. We affirm that this potential conflict of interest has been managed appropriately throughout the research process, adhering to ethical guidelines, and maintaining the confidentiality and anonymity of the participants. Additionally, when selecting participants for the study interviews, conducted by the first author, the five participants who received services from the first and third author were excluded from consideration to minimize potential bias in interview responses stemming from this prior relationship., (Copyright © 2024 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Intrathecal delivery of autologous culture-expanded adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSC) could be utilized to treat traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). This Phase I trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03308565) included 10 patients with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A or B at the time of injury. The study's primary outcome was the safety profile, as captured by the nature and frequency of adverse events. Secondary outcomes included changes in sensory and motor scores, imaging, cerebrospinal fluid markers, and somatosensory evoked potentials. The manufacturing and delivery of the regimen were successful for all patients. The most commonly reported adverse events were headache and musculoskeletal pain, observed in 8 patients. No serious AEs were observed. At final follow-up, seven patients demonstrated improvement in AIS grade from the time of injection. In conclusion, the study met the primary endpoint, demonstrating that AD-MSC harvesting and administration were well-tolerated in patients with traumatic SCI., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Dr. Mauck serves on the editorial board for the Interventional Pain Medicine journal.

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by pruritic eczematous lesions. The effect of treatment withdrawal after response to upadacitinib oral treatment is not fully characterized., Objectives: Assess the effect of upadacitinib withdrawal on skin clearance and itch improvement in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD and evaluate the kinetics of recovery on rescue treatment., Methods: Data from a phase 2b randomized, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02925117) of upadacitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe AD were analysed. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive upadacitinib 7.5 mg, 15 mg, 30 mg or placebo, and then at Week 16, patients were re-randomized 1:1 to receive the same dose of upadacitinib (upadacitinib 30 mg for patients initialized to placebo) or placebo. From Week 20, those who experienced loss of response defined as Eczema Area and Severity Index <50% improvement from baseline (EASI 50) received rescue treatment with upadacitinib 30 mg., Results: Patients who withdrew from upadacitinib experienced a rapid loss of skin clearance response, while those who switched from placebo to upadacitinib gained response. Loss of skin clearance response occurred within 4 weeks and worsening of itch occurred within 5 days. In patients who originally received placebo or a lower dose of upadacitinib leading to a loss of EASI response, rescue treatment with upadacitinib 30 mg resulted in rapid recovery or improvement of both skin and itch responses; most patients who were re-randomized to placebo achieved EASI 75 and IGA 0/1 by 8 weeks of rescue treatment. No new safety risks were observed., Conclusions: Continuous treatment with upadacitinib is suggested to maintain skin clearance and antipruritic effects., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Studies have demonstrated that bleach baths improve atopic dermatitis (AD) severity; however, the effects on itch, skin barrier, and cutaneous microbial composition are less clear. We examined whether bleach baths reduce itch, normalize skin barrier function, reduce S. aureus absolute abundance, and increase microbial diversity in adults with AD who were colonized with S. aureus on their non-lesional skin. This was an open label, non-randomized, controlled trial performed at a single academic center. Fifteen AD and five non-atopic healthy controls (NA) were instructed to take two bleach baths (0.005% NaClO; 5-10 min duration) per week for a total of 12 weeks as add-on therapy. Adults 18 to 65 years (inclusive) with mild to severe AD were recruited with EASI score > 6.0, S. aureus culture positivity, access to a bathtub, and ability and willingness to maintain current topical or systemic treatments. They were evaluated at baseline (before bleach baths), 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after the intervention of twice-weekly bleach baths. Efficacy measurements included EASI as well as 5-D Pruritus and ItchyQoL™. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and stratum corneum (SC) integrity assay were performed to assess the skin barrier. Skin dysbiosis was measured by S. aureus cultivation, S. aureus abundance (qPCR of thermonuclease gene), and V1-V3 16S rRNA gene sequencing on non-lesional and lesional AD skin. After 12 weeks of bleach baths, 8/15 (53.3%) AD subjects achieved an EASI 50 and a significant reduction in itch as measured by 5-D pruritus and Itchy QoL. Eighty-seven percent reported improvements in sleep quality. At study entry, AD subjects had higher non-lesional TEWL values than NA subjects, and only AD subjects experienced a reduction with bleach baths (p = 0.006). Similarly, SC integrity improved as early as 6 weeks after bleach baths in AD subjects. Notably, bleach baths had no significant effect on S. aureus culture-positivity, qPCR absolute abundance, or microbial diversity. The addition of twice-weekly bleach baths improves investigator-assessed AD severity, patient-reported pruritus and sleep as well as physiological measures of skin barrier function in adult AD subjects while having no effect on qualitative and quantitative measures of cutaneous S. aureus. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01996150, Date of registration: November 27th, 2013., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory disorder characterized by dominant type 2 inflammation leading to chronic pruritic skin lesions, allergic comorbidities, and Staphylococcus aureus skin colonization and infections. S aureus is thought to play a role in AD severity., Objectives: This study characterized the changes in the host-microbial interface in subjects with AD following type 2 blockade with dupilumab., Methods: Participants (n = 71) with moderate-severe AD were enrolled in a randomized (dupilumab vs placebo; 2:1), double-blind study at Atopic Dermatitis Research Network centers. Bioassays were performed at multiple time points: S aureus and virulence factor quantification, 16s ribosomal RNA microbiome, serum biomarkers, skin transcriptomic analyses, and peripheral blood T-cell phenotyping., Results: At baseline, 100% of participants were S aureus colonized on the skin surface. Dupilumab treatment resulted in significant reductions in S aureus after only 3 days (compared to placebo), which was 11 days before clinical improvement. Participants with the greatest S aureus reductions had the best clinical outcomes, and these reductions correlated with reductions in serum CCL17 and disease severity. Reductions (10-fold) in S aureus cytotoxins (day 7), perturbations in T H 17-cell subsets (day 14), and increased expression of genes relevant for IL-17, neutrophil, and complement pathways (day 7) were also observed., Conclusions: Blockade of IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, very rapidly (day 3) reduces S aureus abundance in subjects with AD, and this reduction correlates with reductions in the type 2 biomarker, CCL17, and measures of AD severity (excluding itch). Immunoprofiling and/or transcriptomics suggest a role for T H 17 cells, neutrophils, and complement activation as potential mechanisms to explain these findings., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) are uniquely susceptible to a number of serious viral skin complications, including eczema herpeticum (EH), caused by herpes simplex virus. This study explored the associations between biomarkers of epithelial barrier dysfunction, type 2 immunity, Staphylococcus aureus infection, and S. aureus-specific immunoglobulin responses in a cohort of AD subjects with and without a history of EH (EH+ and EH-, respectively)., Methods: A total of 112 subjects with AD (56 EH+, 56 EH-), matched by age and AD severity, were selected from a registry of over 3000 AD subjects. Logistic regression was used to test the association between history of S. aureus skin infection and history of EH, while controlling for a number of confounders., Results: Compared to those without a history of S. aureus skin infection, subjects with a history of S. aureus skin infection were found to have more than sixfold increased odds of having a history of EH (6.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.00-21.83), after adjusting for history of other viral skin infections (molluscum contagiosum virus, human papillomavirus), serum total IgE, and IgG against the S. aureus virulence factor SElX., Conclusions: These findings indicate an important relationship between S. aureus skin infections and EH., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Abrocitinib improved signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) at 12 or 16 weeks in phase 3 studies with a manageable safety profile. Further understanding of the abrocitinib long-term efficacy and safety profile is important for its appropriate use in treating chronic AD., Objective: To evaluate the abrocitinib efficacy up to 48 weeks and long-term safety in patients with moderate-to-severe AD., Methods: JADE EXTEND (NCT03422822) is an ongoing, phase 3, long-term extension study that enrolled patients from previous abrocitinib AD trials. This analysis focusses on patients from the phase 3 JADE MONO-1 (NCT03349060), JADE MONO-2 (NCT03575871) and JADE COMPARE (NCT03720470) studies who completed the full treatment period of placebo or abrocitinib (200 mg or 100 mg once daily) and subsequently entered JADE EXTEND. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving skin clearance (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] 0/1 [clear/almost clear]; ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI-75]) and itch response (Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [PP-NRS] severity ≥4-point improvement). Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs and TEAEs leading to discontinuation. Data cut-off: April 22, 2020., Results: As of the data cut-off, ~70% and ~45% of patients received abrocitinib for ≥36 and ≥48 weeks, respectively. Nasopharyngitis, atopic dermatitis, nausea and upper respiratory tract infections were the most frequent TEAEs. Serious TEAEs occurred in 7% and 5% and TEAEs leading to study discontinuation occurred in 9% and 7% of patients receiving abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg, respectively. Week 48 efficacy responses with abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg were as follows: IGA 0/1 52% and 39%; EASI-75 82% and 67%, and PP-NRS severity ≥4-point improvement 68% and 51%., Conclusions: In patients with moderate-to-severe AD, long-term abrocitinib treatment resulted in clinically meaningful skin and pruritus improvement. The long-term safety profile was manageable and consistent with previous reports., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Background: Abrocitinib improved signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) at Weeks 12 and 16 in phase 3 studies, with a manageable safety profile. Patient-reported outcomes with long-term abrocitinib treatment were not reported., Objective: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes with long-term abrocitinib treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe AD., Methods: JADE EXTEND (NCT03422822) is an ongoing, phase 3, long-term extension study that enrolled patients from previous abrocitinib AD trials. This analysis includes patients from the phase 3 trials JADE MONO-1 (NCT03349060), JADE MONO-2 (NCT03575871) and JADE COMPARE (NCT03720470) who completed the full treatment period of placebo or abrocitinib (200 or 100 mg once daily) and subsequently entered JADE EXTEND and were randomised to receive once-daily abrocitinib 200 or 100 mg. Patient-reported endpoints to Week 48 included the proportion of patients who achieved Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores of 0/1 (no effect of AD on quality of life [QoL]) and a ≥4-point improvement in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) score (clinically meaningful improvement). Data cut-off: April 22, 2020., Results: Baseline DLQI mean scores were 15.4 and 15.3 in the abrocitinib 200- and 100-mg groups, respectively, which corresponded to a 'very large effect' on QoL; at Week 48, mean DLQI scores were lower with abrocitinib 200 mg (4.6; 'small effect' on QoL) and abrocitinib 100 mg (5.9; 'moderate effect' on QoL). Baseline POEM mean scores were 20.4 and 20.5 in the abrocitinib 200- and 100-mg groups, respectively; at Week 48, mean POEM scores were 8.2 and 11.0. Week 48 patient-reported responses with abrocitinib 200 mg and abrocitinib 100 mg were 44% and 34% for DLQI 0/1, and 90% and 77% for a ≥4-point reduction in POEM score., Conclusion: In patients with moderate-to-severe AD, long-term abrocitinib treatment resulted in clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported symptoms of AD, including QoL., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Individuals with atopic dermatitis (AD) are highly colonized by Staphylococcus aureus and are more susceptible to severe viral complications. We hypothesized that S. aureus secreted virulence factors may alter keratinocyte biology to enhance viral susceptibility through disruption of the skin barrier, impaired keratinocyte differentiation, and/or inflammation. To address this hypothesis, human keratinocytes were exposed to conditioned media from multiple S. aureus strains that vary in virulence factor production (USA300, HG003, and RN4220) or select purified virulence factors. We have identified the S. aureus enterotoxin- like superantigen SE l Q, as a virulence factor of interest, since it is highly produced by USA300 and was detected on the skin of 53% of AD subjects ( n = 72) in a study conducted by our group. Treatment with USA300 conditioned media or purified SE l Q resulted in a significant increase in keratinocyte susceptibility to infection with vaccinia virus, and also significantly decreased barrier function. Importantly, we have previously demonstrated that keratinocyte differentiation influences susceptibility to viral infection, and our qPCR observations indicated that USA300 S. aureus and SE l Q alter differentiation in keratinocytes. CRISPR/Cas9 was used to knock out CD40, a potential enterotoxin receptor on epithelial cells. We found that CD40 expression on keratinocytes was not completely necessary for SE l Q-mediated responses, as measured by proinflammatory cytokine expression and barrier function. Together, these findings support that select S. aureus virulence factors, particularly SE l Q, enhance the susceptibility of epidermal cells to viral infection, which may contribute to the increased cutaneous infections observed in individuals with AD. IMPORTANCE Staphylococcus aureus skin colonization and infection are frequently observed in individuals with atopic dermatitis. Many S. aureus strains belong to the clonal group USA300, and these strains produce superantigens including the staphylococcal enterotoxin- like Q (SE l Q). Our studies highlight that SE l Q may play a key role by altering keratinocyte differentiation and reducing barrier function; collectively, this may explain the AD-specific enhanced infection risk to cutaneous viruses. It is unclear what receptor mediates SE l Q's effects on keratinocytes. We have shown that one putative surface receptor, CD40, was not critical for its effects on proinflammatory cytokine production or barrier function.

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition with a highly variable clinical phenotype., Objective: This study aimed to identify historical and clinical features and biomarkers associated with AD severity., Methods: A US registry of extensively phenotyped AD participants (aged 0.73-80 years) were enrolled at 9 academic centers. Information on family and personal medical history, examination, skin swabs (culture), and serum biomarkers was collected to evaluate their association with AD severity., Results: Participants with AD (N = 2862) whose disease was categorized as mild (11.6%), moderate (58.0%), or severe (30.4%) based on Rajka-Langeland scoring were enrolled. The trend test, when adjusting for gender, race, and age, demonstrated that severity was strongly (P ≤ .04) associated with a personal/family history of allergic disorders, history of alopecia, exposure to passive smoke, ocular herpes infection, skin bacterial and viral infections, and history of arrhythmia. Features observed more frequently (P ≤ .002), as a function of severity, included skin infections (impetigo, human papillomavirus, and molluscum contagiosum virus), Staphylococcus aureus colonization, excoriations, hyperlinear palms, ichthyosis, blepharitis, conjunctivitis, ectropion, and wheezing. Serum IgE, allergen and food (≤6 years) Phadiatop, and eosinophilia were strongly linked to severity (P < .001)., Conclusions: In a diverse US AD population, severity was associated with a history of atopic disorders, skin and extracutaneous bacterial and viral infections (by history and physical examination), higher IgE, eosinophilia and allergen sensitization, atopic skin manifestations (ie, excoriation, hyperlinear palms, and ichthyosis), and atopic ocular features (ie, blepharitis, conjunctivitis, and ectropion) as well as asthma findings (ie, wheezing). Data from our prospective registry significantly advance our understanding of AD phenotypes and endotypes, which is critical to achieve optimal management., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. All rights reserved.)

Little is known about whether type 1 (IFNγ), 2 (IL-4/IL-13), or 3 (IL-17A/IL-22) cytokines affect the susceptibility of keratinocytes (KC) to viruses. These immune pathways predominate in various skin diseases: lupus, atopic dermatitis (AD), and psoriasis, respectively. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are approved to treat both AD and psoriasis, and are in clinical development for lupus. We evaluated whether these cytokines alter viral susceptibility of KC and determined if this effect is modulated by treatment with JAKi. Viral susceptibility to vaccinia virus (VV) or herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) ± JAKi was assessed in immortalized and primary human KC pretreated with cytokines. Exposure to type 2 (IL-4 + IL-13) or the type 3 (IL-22) cytokines significantly increased KC viral susceptibility. Specifically, there was a peak increase of 12.2 ± 3.1-fold (IL-4 + IL-13) or 7.7 ± 2.8-fold (IL-22) in VV infection as measured by plaque number. Conversely, IFNγ significantly reduced susceptibility to VV (63.1 ± 64.4-fold). The IL-4 + IL-13-induced viral susceptibility was reduced (44 ± 16%) by JAK1 inhibition, while the IL-22-enhanced viral susceptibility was diminished (76 ± 19%) by TYK2 inhibition. IFNγ-mediated resistance to viral infection was reversed by JAK2 inhibition (366 ± 294% increase in infection). Cytokines expressed in AD skin (IL-4, IL-13, IL-22) increase KC viral susceptibility while IFNγ is protective. JAKi that target JAK1 or TYK2 reversed cytokine-enhanced viral susceptibility, while JAK2 inhibition reduced the protective effects of IFNγ.

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterized by T H 2-dominated skin inflammation and systemic response to cutaneously encountered antigens. The T H 2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-13 play a critical role in the pathogenesis of AD. The Q576->R576 polymorphism in the IL-4 receptor alpha (IL-4Rα) chain common to IL-4 and IL-13 receptors alters IL-4 signaling and is associated with asthma severity., Objective: We sought to investigate whether the IL-4Rα R576 polymorphism is associated with AD severity and exaggerates allergic skin inflammation in mice., Methods: Nighttime itching interfering with sleep, Rajka-Langeland, and Eczema Area and Severity Index scores were used to assess AD severity. Allergic skin inflammation following epicutaneous sensitization of mice 1 or 2 IL-4Rα R576 alleles (QR and RR) and IL-4Rα Q576 (QQ) controls was assessed by flow cytometric analysis of cells and quantitative RT-PCR analysis of cytokines in skin., Results: The frequency of nighttime itching in 190 asthmatic inner-city children with AD, as well as Rajka-Langeland and Eczema Area and Severity Index scores in 1116 White patients with AD enrolled in the Atopic Dermatitis Research Network, was higher in subjects with the IL-4Rα R576 polymorphism compared with those without, with statistical significance for the Rajka-Langeland score. Following epicutaneous sensitization of mice with ovalbumin or house dust mite, skin infiltration by CD4 + cells and eosinophils, cutaneous expression of Il4 and Il13, transepidermal water loss, antigen-specific IgE antibody levels, and IL-13 secretion by antigen-stimulated splenocytes were significantly higher in RR and QR mice compared with QQ controls. Bone marrow radiation chimeras demonstrated that both hematopoietic cells and stromal cells contribute to the mutants' exaggerated allergic skin inflammation., Conclusions: The IL-4Rα R576 polymorphism predisposes to more severe AD and increases allergic skin inflammation in mice., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterized by microbial dysbiosis, immune dysregulation, and an impaired skin barrier. Microbial dysbiosis in AD involves a reduction in diversity primarily driven by an increased abundance of Staphylococcus aureus. Tralokinumab, an approved treatment for adults with moderate-to-severe AD, improves the skin barrier and immune abnormalities by specifically targeting the interleukin 13 cytokine, but its impact on the skin microbiome is unknown., Objective: To investigate how tralokinumab affects the skin microbiome by examining the lesional skin of adults with moderate-to-severe AD from the phase 3 ECZTRA 1 trial (NCT03131648)., Methods: Microbiome profiling, S aureus abundance, and biomarker data were assessed in a subset of ECZTRA 1 participants (S aureus abundance at baseline and week 16; microbiome profiling at baseline, and week 8/16; and serum sampling before dose and week 4/8/16/28/52)., Results: Tralokinumab treatment led to increased microbial diversity, reduced S aureus abundance, and increased abundance of the commensal coagulase-negative Staphylococci., Limitations: Limitations include a lack of S aureus abundance data at week 8, sampling site variation between participants, and possible influence from concomitant systemic antiinfectives., Conclusion: Our findings indicate specific targeting of the interleukin 13 cytokine with tralokinumab can directly and/or indirectly improve microbial dysbiosis seen in AD skin., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Dr Beck has been a consultant for Allakos, Arena Pharmaceuticals, DermTech, Evelo Biosciences, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Merck, Numab Therapeutics, Pfizer, Rapt Therapeutics, Regeneron, Ribon Therapeutics, Sanofi/Genzyme, Sanofi-Aventis, Stealth BioTherapeutics, Trevi Therapeutics, Union Therapeutics and Xencor; DMC member for Novartis; and investigator for AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, DermTech, Kiniksa, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Ribon Therapeutics. Dr Bieber has been a speaker, and/or consultant, and/or investigator for AbbVie, Allmiral, AnaptysBio, Arena, Asana Biosciences, ASLAN pharma, Bayer Health, BioVerSys, Böhringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Connect Pharma, Dermavant, Domain Therapeutics, Galderma, Glenmark, GSK, Incyte, Innovaderm, IQVIA, Janssen, Kirin, Kymab, LEO, LG Chem, Eli Lilly, L´Oréal, MSD, Novartis, Numab, OM-Pharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Q32bio, RAPT, Sanofi/Regeneron, and UCB. He is founder and chairman of the board of the non-profit biotech “Davos Biosciences.” Dr Weidinger received institutional research grants from La Roche Posay, LEO Pharma, and Sanofi Deutschland GmbH, and lecture and/or consultancy fees from AbbVie, Almirall, Eli Lilly, Kymab, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sanofi-Genzyme. He is involved in performing clinical trials with many pharmaceutical industries that manufacture drugs used for the treatment of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Dr Tauber is an investigator for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Galderma, LEO Pharma, Pierre Fabre, and Sanofi-Regeneron; a consultant or advisory board member for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, MEDAC, and Sanofi-Regeneron. Dr Saeki has received lecture fees from Kyorin, Kyowa Kirin, LEO Pharma, Maruho, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Sanofi, Taiho, and Tokiwa; and scholarship donations from Esai, Maruho, Mitsubishi Tanabe, and Torii. Dr Irvine reports personal fees (Speaker fees and Consulting fees) from AbbVie, Arena, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sanofi. Dr Eichenfield has been a scientific adviser and/or clinical study investigator for AbbVie, Almirall, Asana, Aslan, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Forte, Galderma, Glenmark, Incyte, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer Inc., Regeneron, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Dr Werfel received lecture and/or consultancy fees from AbbVie, Almirall, Galderma, Eli Lilly, Janssen/JNJ, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, and Regeneron/Sanofi. Drs Arlert, Jiang, and Røpke are employees of LEO Pharma. Dr Paller has been an investigator for AbbVie, Incyte, Eli Lilly, and Regeneron; Data Safety Monitoring Board for AbbVie, Bausch and Galderma; and consultant for AbbVie, Almirall, Anaptysbio, Arena, BiomX, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Forte, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sanofi-Genzyme., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: GA 2 LEN-ADCARE is a branch of the largest multidisciplinary network of research centres and clinical care in allergy and asthma, GA 2 LEN, focussing on the field of atopic dermatitis (AD). AD is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with high burden and many comorbidities requiring different levels of treatment. The need for aligned information from all involved healthcare providers led to the discussion of an integrated care pathway (ICP) plan for AD patient care involving all stakeholders and considering the complexity and variability of the disease, with a particular focus placed on the large number of patients with milder forms of AD., Methods: The GA 2 LEN ADCARE network and all stakeholders, abbreviated the AD-ICPs working group, were involved in the discussion and preparation of the AD-ICPs during a series of subgroup workshops and meetings in years 2020 and 2021., Results: Here we discuss the unmet needs in AD, the methodology for devising an AD-ICP and the ICP action plan., Conclusion: The GA 2 LEN ADCARE network has outlined the unmet needs in AD and provided an action plan for devising AD-ICPs, considering the complexity and variability of the disease., (© 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.)

Innate immune molecules, including antimicrobial peptides (for example, defensins) and lysozyme, function to delay or prevent bacterial infections. These molecules are commonly found on mucosal and skin surfaces. Staphylococcus aureus is a common pathogen and causes millions of infections annually. It is well known that innate immune molecules, such as defensins and lysozyme, either poorly inhibit or do not inhibit the growth of S. aureus. Our current studies show that the α-defensin human neutrophil α-defensin-1 (HNP-1) and lysozyme inhibit exotoxin production, both hemolysins and superantigens, which are required for S. aureus infection. HNP-1 inhibited exotoxin production at concentrations as low as 0.001 μg/mL. Lysozyme inhibited exotoxin production at 0.05 to 0.5 μg/mL. Both HNP-1 and lysozyme functioned through at least one two-component system (SrrA/B). The β-defensin human β-defensin 1 (HBD-1) inhibited hemolysin but not superantigen production. The cation chelator S100A8/A9 (calprotectin), compared to EDTA, was tested for the ability to inhibit exotoxin production. EDTA at high concentrations inhibited exotoxin production; these were the same concentrations that interfered with staphylococcal growth. S100A8/A9 at the highest concentration tested (10 μg/mL) had no effect on S. aureus growth but enhanced exotoxin production. Lower concentrations had no effect on growth or exotoxin production. Lysostaphin is regularly used to lyse S. aureus. The lytic concentrations of lysostaphin were the only concentrations that also inhibited growth and exotoxin production. Our studies demonstrate that a major activity of innate defensin peptides and lysozyme is inhibition of staphylococcal exotoxin production but not inhibition of growth. IMPORTANCE Staphylococcus aureus causes large numbers of both relatively benign and serious human infections, which are mediated in large part by the organisms' secreted exotoxins. Since 1921, it has been known that lysozyme and, as shown later in the 1900s, other innate immune peptides, including human neutrophil α-defensin-1 (HNP-1) and human β-defensin 1 (HBD-1), are either not antistaphylococcal or are only weakly inhibitory to growth. Our study confirms those findings but, importantly, shows that at subgrowth inhibitory concentrations, these positively charged innate immune peptides inhibit exotoxin production, including both hemolysins and the superantigen toxic shock syndrome toxin-1. The data show that the principal activity of innate immune peptides in the host is likely to be inhibition of exotoxin production required for staphylococcal mucosal or skin colonization rather than growth inhibition.

The safe management of allergic skin disorders during pregnancy is essential to maternal and fetal health. Poorly controlled allergic skin disease affects the health of mother and child. This article reviews the disease course and treatment of atopic dermatitis, chronic urticaria, and allergic contact dermatitis in pregnancy. It focuses on topical and systemic therapies in the context of pregnancy and breastfeeding. Because disease activity may vary in pregnancy, prescription stewardship is imperative; a balance among disease control, minimum effective dosing, and medication safety profiles should be maintained. Secondary complications and risks to maternal or infant health should also be avoided., Competing Interests: Disclosure Atopic Dermatitis Research Network (ADRN) 3 grant U01AI152011. Conflicts of interest L.A. Beck is a consultant for AbbVie, Allakos, Astra-Zeneca, AIBio, Sanofi/Genzyme, DermTech, Sanofi-Aventis, and Stealth biotherapeutics; and an investigator for AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, Kiniska, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sanofi. L. Laageide is an investigator for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Kiniska, Sanofi, Pfizer, Regeneron, and DermTech. E. Pope is an investigator for DermTech., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Various culture media are used to propagate keratinocytes (KCs) in vitro. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in supply chain shortages necessitating substitutions to standard laboratory protocols, which resulted in many laboratories having to use culture media different from those they typically use. We screened available media on the KC line N/TERT2G and found that biological responses varied considerably across three culture media: KC serum-free media, KC growth medium 2, and defined media. We observed qualitative and quantitative differences in proliferation; KCs cultured in defined media had significantly lower proliferative capacity. KC differentiation was assessed by western blot for CLDN1, occludin, cytokeratin-10, and loricrin. Elevated expression of differentiation markers was observed in cells cultured in either KC growth medium 2 or defined media compared with those in cells cultured in KC serum-free media. KC barrier function was measured by transepithelial electrical resistance. KCs cultured in KC growth medium 2 and defined media developed significantly higher transepithelial electrical resistance than those cultured in KC serum-free media, and when treated with IL-4 and IL-13 or IL-17A, we observed variable responses. H&E staining on day 5 -post-differentiation showed greater epithelial thickness in KCs cultured in defined media and KC growth medium 2 than in those cultured in KC serum-free media. These findings show that the choice of culture media impacts the biological response of KCs in a manner that persists through differentiation in the same media., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) often requires long-term management with systemic therapies., Objective: Our objective was to report the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment up to 4 years in adults with moderate-to-severe AD and efficacy in a subgroup of patients who transitioned from dupilumab once-weekly (qw) to administration every other week (q2w)., Methods: This interim analysis of the open-label extension study (NCT01949311) evaluated dupilumab 300 mg qw or q2w in adults previously enrolled in dupilumab trials for moderate-to-severe AD. Patients switched from qw to q2w following protocol amendment. The primary outcome was safety; efficacy was also assessed., Results: Of 2677 patients enrolled and treated, 352 (13.1%) completed week 204 (end of efficacy assessments) and 202 (7.5%) completed safety follow-up through week 244. Self-reported compliance was 98.1%. Dupilumab's safety profile was consistent with previous reports. Common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥5%) included nasopharyngitis, AD, upper respiratory tract infection, oral herpes, conjunctivitis, injection-site reaction, and headache. At week 204, mean ± standard deviation (SD) Eczema Area and Severity Index was 2.46 ± 3.98, and mean percent change from parent study baseline (PSBL) was -91.07%; mean ± SD Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score was 2.10 ± 1.83, and mean percent change from PSBL was -68.74%. Efficacy was maintained in patients (n = 226) who transitioned from qw to q2w dosing. Limitations of this study included its open-label design, the lack of control arm, and smaller subsets of patients at later timepoints and receiving the approved q2w regimen., Conclusion: These results support dupilumab as continuous long-term treatment for adults with moderate-to-severe AD; efficacy was sustained following transition from qw to q2w dosing. TRIAL REGISTRATION CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01949311., (© 2022. The Author(s).)