Search

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assess overall survival are considered the "gold standard" when evaluating the efficacy and safety of a new oncology intervention. However, single-arm trials that use surrogate endpoints (e.g., objective response rate or duration of response) to evaluate clinical benefit have become the basis for accelerated or breakthrough regulatory approval of precision oncology drugs for cases where the target and research populations are relatively small. Interpretation of efficacy in single-arm trials can be challenging because such studies lack a standard-of-care comparator arm. Although an external control group can be based on data from other clinical trials, using an external control group based on data collected outside of a trial may not only offer an alternative to both RCTs and uncontrolled single-arm trials, but it may also help improve decision-making by study sponsors or regulatory authorities. Hence, leveraging real-world data (RWD) to construct external control arms in clinical trials that investigate the efficacy and safety of drug interventions in oncology has become a topic of interest. Herein, we review the benefits and challenges associated with the use of RWD to construct external control groups, and the relevance of RWD to early oncology drug development., Competing Interests: TAY has received research support (paid to his institution) from Artios Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, BioNTech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Cyteir Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Serono, Forbius, F-Star, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Haihe, ImmuneSensor Therapeutics, Ionis, Ipsen, Jounce Therapeutics, Karyopharm Therapeutics, KSQ, Kyowa Hakko USA, Merck & Co., Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Repare, Ribon Therapeutics Inc, Sanofi, Scholar Rock, Seattle Genetics, Tesaro, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; and has received fees for consulting from Aduro Inc, Almac, Artios, AstraZeneca, Athena, Atrin Pharmaceuticals, Axiom, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera Biosciences, Clovis Oncology, Cybrexa Therapeutics, EMD Serono, F-Star, GLG, Guidepoint, Ignyta, I-Mab Biopharma, ImmuneSensor, Janssen, Merck & Co., Pfizer, Repare Therapeutics, Roche, Schrodinger, Seattle Genetics, Varian Medical Systems, Zai Lab and ZielBio. LA has received personal fees from Janssen and Pfizer. IJ and LJL are full-time employees of and hold stock/options in Pfizer. DB was a full-time employee of and held stock/options in Pfizer when the manuscript was in development. EB is an employee of Roche Diagnostics but was a full-time employee of Pfizer when the manuscript was in development and holds stock/options in Pfizer and Roche. The authors declare that this study received funding from Pfizer. The funder had the following involvement with the study: provided funding for medical writing and editorial support. The reviewer JL declared a past co-authorship one of the authors TY to the handling Editor., (Copyright © 2022 Yap, Jacobs, Baumfeld Andre, Lee, Beaupre and Azoulay.)

Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is difficult to cure; non-germinal center B-cell-like (non-GCB) and activated B-cell-like (ABC) DLBCL have worse outcomes than GCB DLBCL. Ibrutinib and lenalidomide are synergistic in vitro in ABC DLBCL and may augment salvage chemotherapy. In part 1 of this phase 1b/2 study (NCT02142049), patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL received ibrutinib 560 mg and escalating doses of lenalidomide on Days 1-7 with DA-EPOCH-R (Days 1-5) in 21-day cycles. In part 1 ( N  = 15), the maximum tolerated dose was not reached with lenalidomide 25 mg (recommended part 2 dose [RP2D]); most common grade ≥3 adverse events were anemia (73%) and febrile neutropenia (47%); the overall response rate (ORR) was 40%. At the RP2D ( n  = 26), ORR was 71% in non-GCB and 64% in ABC. Ibrutinib and lenalidomide with DA-EPOCH-R had a manageable safety profile and antitumor activity in relapsed/refractory DLBCL, especially the non-GCB subtype.

Regulatory changes have been enacted in the United States (US) and European Union (EU) to encourage the development of new treatments for pediatric cancer. Here, we review some of the factors that have hampered the development of pediatric cancer treatments and provide a comparison of the US and EU regulations implemented to address this clinical need. We then provide some recommendations for each stage of the oncology drug development pathway to help researchers maximize their chance of successful drug development while complying with regulations. A key recommendation is the engagement of key stakeholders such as regulatory authorities, pediatric oncologists, academic researchers, patient advocacy groups, and a Pediatric Expert Group early in the drug development process. During drug target selection, sponsors are encouraged to consult the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the FDA target list, in addition to relevant US and European consortia that have been established to characterize and prioritize oncology drug targets. Sponsors also need to carefully consider the resourcing requirements for preclinical testing, which include ensuring appropriate access to the most relevant databases, clinical samples, and preclinical models (cell lines and animal models). During clinical development, sponsors can account for the pharmacodynamic (PD)/pharmacokinetic (PK) considerations specific to a pediatric population by developing pediatric formulations, selecting suitable PD endpoints, and employing sparse PK sampling or modeling/simulation of drug exposures where appropriate. Additional clinical considerations include the specific design of the clinical trial, the potential inclusion of children in adult trials, and the value of cooperative group trials., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

The ideal starting dose for an oncology first-in-patient (FIP) trial should be low enough to be safe but not too far removed from therapeutically relevant doses. A low starting dose combined with small dose increments could lead to a lengthy dose escalation and could expose patients unnecessarily to sub-therapeutic dosing. In the current analyses, we reviewed 59 approved small molecule oncology drugs (SMOD) with the overarching goals to assess the current approaches of FIP starting dose selection and dose escalation, and to identify potential opportunities for improving trial efficiency and minimizing number of patients receiving sub-therapeutic dose levels. Of 59 SMODs, the majority (~ 66%) were kinase inhibitors and ~ 73% were approved for solid tumor indications. Most of the trials used a 3 + 3 design for dose escalation and had a median (range) of 4 cohorts (0-11) to reach MTD from the starting dose. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) to starting dose ratio was highly variable with a median (range) of 8 (0.25-125). About 71% of the FIP trials had < 6 dose escalation steps to reach MTD or RP2D (with 15% ≤ 2 dose escalations), but the remaining 29% of trials had ≥ 6 dose escalation steps to reach MTD or RP2D suggesting that there is still room for increasing efficiency by reducing the number of dose escalation steps, reducing the variability in MTD to starting dose ratio, and consequently reducing significant number of patients exposed at sub-therapeutic doses in the dose escalation phase of FIP study.

Ibrutinib is highly active in treating mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), an aggressive B-cell lymphoma. We pooled data from three ibrutinib studies to explore the impact of baseline patient characteristics on treatment response. Patients with relapsed/refractory MCL (n = 370) treated with ibrutinib had an objective response rate (ORR) of 66% (20% complete response; 46% partial response); median duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 18·6, 12·8 and 25·0 months, respectively. Univariate analyses showed patients with one versus >one prior line of therapy had longer OS. Multivariate analyses identified that one prior line of therapy affected PFS; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, simplified MCL international prognostic index (sMIPI) score, bulky disease, and blastoid histology affected OS and PFS. Patients with blastoid versus non-blastoid histology had similar time to best response, but lower ORR, DOR, PFS and OS. OS and PFS were longer in patients with better sMIPI, patients with ECOG performance status 0-1, non-bulky disease and non-blastoid histology. Additionally, the proportion of patients with poor prognostic factors increased with increasing lines of therapy. Together, results suggest that patient outcomes following treatment failure with ibrutinib are related to the natural biological evolution of the disease., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous lymphoma and the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, accounting for roughly 30% of newly diagnosed cases in the United States. DLBCL can be separated into the activated B cell-like (ABC) and germinal center B cell-like (GCB) subtypes, with distinct gene expression profiles, oncogenic aberrations, and clinical outcomes. ABC-DLBCL is characterized by chronically active B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling that can be modulated by Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) activity. Thus, BTK serves as an attractive therapeutic target in this type of B-cell malignancy. Ibrutinib, a first-in-class, orally available covalent BTK inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical activity in several B-cell leukemias and lymphomas. A phase 1/2 clinical trial of single-agent ibrutinib in relapsed and refractory DLBCL patients revealed an overall response rate of 37% in ABC-DLBCL patients. However, responses to kinase-directed therapies are often limited by emerging resistance mechanisms that bypass the therapeutic target. Here we report the discovery of point mutations within the kinase PIM1 that reduce sensitivity to ibrutinib in ABC-DLBCL. These mutations stabilize PIM1 and affect upstream regulators and downstream targets of NF-κB signaling. The introduction of mutant PIM1 into an ABC-DLBCL cell line, TMD8, increased colony formation and decreased sensitivity to ibrutinib. In addition, ibrutinib-resistant cell lines generated by prolonged ibrutinib exposure in vitro upregulated PIM1 expression, consistent with a role for PIM1 in antagonizing ibrutinib activity. The combination of a pan-PIM inhibitor with ibrutinib synergistically inhibited proliferation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo . Together, these data provide a rationale for combining BTK and PIM1 inhibition in the treatment of ABC-DLBCL.

Purpose: HER3 is a key dimerization partner for other HER family members, and its expression is associated with poor prognosis. This first-in-human study of U3-1287 (NCT00730470), a fully human anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody, evaluated its safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics in patients with advanced solid tumor., Experimental Design: The study was conducted in 2 parts: part 1--sequential cohorts received escalating doses (0.3-20 mg/kg) of U3-1287 every 2 weeks, starting 3 weeks after the first dose; part 2--additional patients received 9, 14, or 20 mg/kg U3-1287 every 2 weeks, based on observed tolerability and pharmacokinetics from part 1. Recommended phase II dose, adverse event rates, pharmacokinetics, and tumor response were determined., Results: Fifty-seven patients (part 1: 26; part 2: 31) received U3-1287. As no dose-limiting toxicities were reported, the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. The maximum-administered dose was 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The most frequent adverse events related to U3-1287 were fatigue (21.1%), diarrhea (12.3%), nausea (10.5%), decreased appetite (7.0%), and dysgeusia (5.3%). No patient developed anti-U3-1287 antibodies. In these heavily pretreated patients, stable disease was maintained 9 weeks or more in 19.2% in part 1 and 10 weeks or more in 25.8% in part 2., Conclusion: U3-1287 treatment was well tolerated, and some evidence of disease stabilization was observed. Pharmacokinetic data support U3-1287 dosing of 9 to 20 mg/kg every 2 to 3 weeks. Combination studies of U3-1287 are ongoing., (©2013 AACR)

Interleukin (IL)-1beta is constitutively expressed in many leukemias and operates as an autocrine growth factor. To study the cellular basis for this aberrant production, we analyzed two cell lines, B1 (acute lymphoblastic leukemia) and W1 (juvenile chronic myelogenous leukemia), which express high levels of IL-1beta and have mutations in the K-RAS and N-RAS genes, respectively. Electromobility shift assays demonstrated transcription factor binding at multiple IL-1beta promoter elements [nuclear factor (NF)-IL6/CREB, NFB1, NFkappaB, and NF-IL6], consistent with the activation of an upstream signaling pathway. To determine whether activated Ras was involved, two structurally distinct classes of farnesyltransferase (FTase) inhibitors (the monoterpenes and a peptidomimetic) and an adenoviral vector expressing antisense targeted to K-RAS were used to specifically interfere with Ras function and/or expression. Treatment with the FTase inhibitors resulted in a concentration-dependent decrease in both NF-IL6/CREB binding to the IL-1beta promoter and IL-1beta protein levels, without a significant change in total cellular protein levels. Furthermore, exposure of the B1 cells to antisense against K-RAS resulted in an approximately 50% reduction in both p21Ras and IL-1beta protein levels. Growth suppression was observed after FTase inhibitor or antisense exposure, an effect that was partially reversible by the addition of recombinant IL-1beta to the cultures. Our observations suggest that mutated RAS genes may mediate autocrine IL-1beta production in some leukemias by stimulating signal transduction pathways that activate the IL-1beta promoter.

Purpose and Design: The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the literature linking Ras signaling pathways and leukemia and to discuss the biologic and potential therapeutic implications of these observations. A search of MEDLINE from 1966 to October 1998 was performed., Results: A wealth of data has been published on the role of Ras pathways in cancer. To be biologically active, Ras must move from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane. Importantly, a posttranslational modification--addition of a farnesyl group to the Ras C-terminal cysteine--is a requisite for membrane localization of Ras. Farnesylation of Ras is catalyzed by an enzyme that is designated farnesyltransferase. Recently, several compounds have been developed that can inhibit farnesylation. Preclinical studies indicate that these molecules can suppress transformation and tumor growth in vitro and in animal models, with little toxicity to normal cells., Conclusion: An increasing body of data suggests that disruption of Ras signaling pathways, either directly through mutations or indirectly through other genetic aberrations, is important in the pathogenesis of a wide variety of cancers. Molecules such as farnesyl transferase inhibitors that interfere with the function of Ras may be exploitable in leukemia (as well as in solid tumors) as novel antitumor agents.

As the molecular mechanisms responsible for the development and propagation of cancer are becoming elucidated, the nascent field of gene-directed therapy is emerging. Recently, several investigators have described inhibitors of the Ras protein. This molecule has been targeted because RAS is one of the most commonly mutated oncogenes in human neoplasia. In this review, we will discuss the role of Ras in the pathogenesis of hematologic neoplasms, and the biology behind the development of novel compounds which specifically suppress Ras function.