Search

Background: Mucorales infections continue to cause significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts despite the advent of new approaches for diagnosis and treatment of fungal infections. We aimed to evaluate risk factors and outcomes of Mucorales infection in solid organ transplant, hematopoietic cell transplant, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy recipients., Methods: This single-center retrospective study included solid organ transplant, hematopoietic cell transplant, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell patients with cultures positive for Mucorales., Results: Forty-three patients were included for analysis; 34 solid organ transplant (79%) and 9 hematopoietic stem cell transplant or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (21%). Infection with Mucorales occurred a median of 184 days after transplant. At the time of diagnosis, 36 patients were on antifungal prophylaxis with the majority receiving posaconazole (53%). Thirty-three had clinically significant disease; 30 received definitive anti-Mucorales therapy and 3 empiric antifungal therapy. Isavuconazole was the most common azole used for treatment in monotherapy recipients. All-cause mortality was 64% and, of these deaths, 18 (75%) were directly related to Mucormycosis. The highest mortality was seen in disseminated and intra-abdominal disease (100%), followed by pulmonary disease (50%). There was no significant association with mortality and transplant type or number of immunosuppressive agents., Conclusion: Mucormycosis is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Breakthrough infection was not uncommon in this study. Data regarding the incidence of infection at approximately 6 months after transplantation can inform prophylaxis and treatment regimens. The spectrum of antifungal regimens used reflects the lack of consensus on ideal regimens for these organisms and a need for more studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Aquatic opportunistic pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila, known to persist in low-nutrient chlorinated waters, can cause life-threatening infections. Two intensive care units experienced a cluster of Aeromonas infections following outdoor temperature spikes coinciding with recurrent plumbing issues, with fatalities due to severe underlying comorbidities co-occurring with extensively-drug resistant (XDR) Aeromonas., Methods: We investigated this cluster using whole genome sequencing to assess genetic relatedness of isolates and identify antimicrobial resistance determinants. Three A. hydrophila were isolated from patients staying in or adjacent to rooms with plumbing issues during or immediately after periods of elevated outdoor temperatures. Sinks and faucets were swabbed for culture., Results: All A. hydrophila clinical isolates exhibited carbapenem resistance but were not genetically related. Diverse resistance determinants corresponding to extensively-drug resistant were found, including co-occurring KPC-3 and VIM-2, OXA-232, and chromosomal CphA-like carbapenemase genes, contributing to major treatment challenges. All 3 patients were treated with multiple antibiotic regimens to overcome various carbapenemase classes and expired due to underlying comorbidities. Environmental culture yielded no Aeromonas., Conclusions: While the investigation revealed no singular source of contamination, it supports a possible link between plumbing issues, elevated outdoor temperatures and incidence of nosocomial Aeromonas infections. The diversity of carbapenemase genes detected in these wastewater-derived Aeromonas warrants heightened infection prevention precautions during periods of plumbing problems especially with heat waves., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients with a failing kidney allograft are often continued on immunosuppression (IS) to preserve residual kidney function and prevent allosensitization. It has been previously accepted that maintaining patients on immunosuppressive therapy results in an increased risk of infection, hospitalization, and mortality. However, as the management of IS in patients with a failed kidney allograft continues to evolve, it is important to review the data regarding associations between infection and specific immunosuppression regimens. We present a review of the literature of failed kidney allograft management and infection risk, and discuss practices for infection prevention. Fifteen studies, published from 1995 to 2022, which investigated the experience of patients with failed allograft and infection, were identified. Infection was most commonly documented as a general event, but when specified, included infections caused by Candida , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , and Aspergillus. In addition, the definition of reduced "IS" varied from decreased doses of a triple drug regimen to monotherapy, whereas others did not specify which medications patients were receiving. Despite attempts at lowering net immunosuppression, patients with failed allografts remain at risk of acquiring opportunistic and non-opportunistic infections. Although opportunistic infections secondary to IS are expected, somewhat surprisingly, it appears that the greatest risk of infection may be related to complications of dialysis. Therefore, mitigating strategies, such as planning for an arteriovenous (AV) fistula over a hemodialysis catheter placement, may reduce infection risk. Additional studies are needed to provide more information regarding the types and timing of infection in the setting of a failed kidney allograft. In addition, more data are needed regarding specific medications, doses, and timing of taper of IS to guide future patient management and inform strategies for infection surveillance and prophylaxis., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor declared a shared affiliation with the authors at the time of the review., (Copyright © 2023 Ogawa, Beaird and Schaenman.)

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, it remains unclear whether the risk factor for SOT patients is the immunosuppression inherent to transplantation versus patient comorbidities., Methods: We reviewed outcomes in a cohort of SOT (n = 129) and non-SOT (NSOT) patients (n = 708) admitted to the University of California, Los Angeles for COVID-19 infection. Data analyses utilized multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the impact of patient demographics, comorbidities, and transplant status on outcomes. SOT patients were analyzed by kidney SOT (KSOT) versus nonkidney SOT (NKSOT) groups., Results: SOT and NSOT patients with COVID-19 infection differed in terms of patient age, ethnicity, and comorbidities. NKSOT patients were the most likely to experience death, with a mortality rate of 16.2% compared with 1.8% for KSOT and 8.3% for NSOT patients (p = .013). Multivariable analysis of hospitalized patients revealed that patient age (odds ratio [OR] 2.79, p = .001) and neurologic condition (OR 2.66, p < .001) were significantly associated with mortality. Analysis of ICU patients revealed a 2.98-fold increased odds of death in NKSOT compared with NSOT patients (p = .013)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates the importance of transplant status in predicting adverse clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized or admitted to the ICU with COVID-19, especially for NKSOT patients. Transplant status and comorbidities, including age, could be used to risk stratify patients with COVID-19. This data suggests that immunosuppression contributes to COVID-19 disease severity and mortality and may have implications for managing immunosuppression, especially for critically ill patients admitted to the ICU., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Mycoplasma hominis can cause significant infections after solid organ transplantation (SOT). Treatment should be guided by susceptibility testing, but conventional lab methods are laborious with prolonged turnaround time (TAT). This case series compares the phenotypic and genotypic susceptibility profiles of M. hominis isolates identified from SOT patients., Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study evaluating SOT recipients with confirmed M. hominis infections. Patients' demographic, clinical, microbiological, and radiographic data were collected. Culture of M. hominis isolates was performed according to current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Phenotypic susceptibility testing was performed by University of Alabama Diagnostic Mycoplasma Laboratory. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed followed by bioinformatic analysis of known genetic determinants of resistance., Results: Seven SOT recipients with M. hominis infections were identified. Two out of seven (28.5%) patients had resistance detected by phenotypic susceptibility testing (Case 5 to levofloxacin and Case 7 to tetracycline). Genomic analyses confirmed the presence of mutations in the parC and parE topoisomerase genes at positions conferring to fluoroquinolone resistance in the isolate from Case 5, while the tetracycline-resistant isolate from Case 7 harbored the tetM gene. The median TAT from the date of specimen collection was 24 days for phenotypic susceptibility testing and 14 days for genotypic susceptibility testing. All seven patients received antimicrobials directed toward M. hominis and recovered with complete resolution of infection., Conclusions: WGS may offer a novel and more rapid methodology for M. hominis susceptibility testing to help optimize antimicrobial usage, but more data are needed., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

We describe a case of endogenous endophthalmitis caused by sequence type 66-K2 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in a diabetic patient with no travel history outside the United States. Genomic analysis showed the pathogen has remained highly conserved, retaining >98% genetic similarity to the original strain described in Indonesia in 1935.

Purpose: We reviewed the clinical experience of kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in order to understand the impact of the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic infection on transplant recipients. Given that early reports from heavily affected areas demonstrated a very high mortality rate amongst kidney transplant recipients, ranging between 30% and 40%, we sought to evaluate outcomes at a center with a high burden of cases but not experiencing acute crisis due to COVID-19., Procedures: In this single center retrospective observational study, medical records of all kidney transplant recipients at the UCLA Medical Center were reviewed for a diagnosis of COVID-19 by polymerase chain reaction, followed by chart review to determine kidney transplant characteristics and clinical course., Main Findings: A total of 41 kidney transplant recipients were identified with COVID-19 positive polymerase chain reaction. Recipients had been transplanted for a median of 47 months before diagnosis. The large proportion of infected individuals were minorities (Hispanic 65.9%, black 14.6%), on prednisone, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (95.1%, 87.8%, and 87.8%, respectively), and had excellent allograft function (median 1.25 mg/dL). The most common presenting symptoms were fever, dyspnea, or cough. Most patients were hospitalized (63.4%); mortality was 9.8% and occurred only in patients in the intensive care unit. The most common treatment was reduction or removal of antimetabolite (77.8%). Approximately 26.9% presented with AKI., Conclusions: COVID-19 infection in kidney transplant recipients results in a higher rate of hospitalization and mortality than in the general population. In an area with a high number of infections, the mortality rate was lower compared with earlier reports from areas experiencing early surge and strain on the medical system. Minorities were disproportionately affected. Future studies are needed to determine optimal approach to treatment and management of immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 infection., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) refers to a spectrum of Aspergillus -mediated disease that is associated with high morbidity and mortality, with its true prevalence vastly underestimated. The diagnosis of CPA includes characteristic radiographical findings in conjunction with persistent and systemic symptoms present for at least three months, and evidence of Aspergillus infection. Traditionally, Aspergillus infection has been confirmed through histopathology and microbiological studies, including fungal culture and serology, but these methodologies have limitations that are discussed in this review. The treatment of CPA requires an individualized approach and consideration of both medical and surgical options. Most Aspergillus species are considered susceptible to mold-active triazoles, echinocandins, and amphotericin B; however, antifungal resistance is emerging and well documented, demonstrating the need for novel therapies and antifungal susceptibility testing that correlates with clinical response. Here, we describe the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of CPA, with an emphasis on the strengths and pitfalls of diagnostic and treatment approaches, as well as future directions, including whole genome sequencing and metagenomic sequencing. The advancement of molecular technology enables rapid and precise species level identification, and the determination of molecular mechanisms of resistance, bridging the clinical infectious disease, anatomical pathology, microbiology, and molecular biology disciplines., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The incidence of syphilis is increasing. Syphilitic proctitis involving the rectal mucosa often presents with pain on defecation, rectal bleeding, or ulceration. We present a case of asymptomatic syphilitic proctitis diagnosed upon a routine screening colonoscopy.

Background: The optimal treatment for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in adult immunocompromised patients is unknown. We assessed the management of RSV and other non-influenza respiratory viruses in Midwestern transplant centers., Methods: A survey assessing strategies for RSV and other non-influenza respiratory viral infections was sent to 13 centers., Results: Multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay was used for diagnosis in 11/12 centers. Eight of 12 centers used inhaled ribavirin (RBV) in some patient populations. Barriers included cost, safety, lack of evidence, and inconvenience. Six of 12 used intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), mostly in combination with RBV. Inhaled RBV was used more than oral, and in the post-stem cell transplant population, patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), graft-versus-host disease, and more recent transplantation were treated at higher rates. Ten centers had experience with lung transplant patients; all used either oral or inhaled RBV for LRTI, 6/10 treated upper respiratory tract infection (URTI). No center treated non-lung solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with URTI; 7/11 would use oral or inhaled RBV in the same group with LRTI. Patients with hematologic malignancy without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were treated with RBV at a similar frequency to non-lung SOT recipients. Three of 12 centers, in severe cases, treated parainfluenza and metapneumovirus, and 1/12 treated coronavirus., Conclusions: Treatment of RSV in immunocompromised patients varied greatly. While most centers treat LRTI, treatment of URTI was variable. No consensus was found regarding the use of oral versus inhaled RBV, or the use of IVIG. The presence of such heterogeneity demonstrates the need for further studies defining optimal treatment of RSV in immunocompromised hosts., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)