Search

Objective: Acute pain after cesarean section (CS) can affect the quality of life of patients. This study aimed to assess the impact of bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) under spinal anaesthesia on postoperative pain, analgesic usage, and patient satisfaction in elective CS., Methods: A total of 116 ASA II females aged 18-45 years who had elective CS were included in this prospective randomized study. Adjusted for the patient's height and weight, 0.5% bupivacaine and 12.5 μg fentanyl were administered for spinal anaesthesia. In the ESPB group, ultrasonography-guided ESPB with 10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine+10 mL saline was applied bilaterally at the T12 vertebrae level at the end of the surgery. Postoperative analgesia was planned with diclofenac and paracetamol. Patients' satisfaction, analgesic usage, rest, movement, cough, and low back pain were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at postoperative hours 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24. The extent of the sensory block level of ESPB was evaluated after the spinal anaesthesia had worn off., Results: The analysis included 49 patients in the ESPB group and 50 in the control group with comparable demographics. Rest, movement, and cough VAS scores were substantially lower at the 2 nd , 4 th , 6 th , and 12 th h in the ESPB group, and satisfaction was better. Total analgesic consumption and the need for rescue analgesics were higher in the control group. VAS scores and ESPB spread levels are negatively correlated., Conclusion: As a safe component of multimodal analgesia following CS, bilateral ESPB can be effectively performed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (©Copyright 2024 by the Turkish Anesthesiology and Reanimation Association / Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology & Reanimation is published by Galenos Publishing House.)

Norepinephrine has been recently introduced for prophylaxis against post-spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery; however, no data are available regarding its optimum dosing scheme. The primary objective of this study is to compare three different infusion and bolus dose combinations of norepinephrine for prophylaxis against post-spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery. This randomized, double-blind study was performed between February 2021 and May 2022. The study protocol was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov with the identification number NCT04701190. A total of 192 parturients were enrolled into this study. Patients were assigned to three groups-Zero-Bolus High-Infusion (Group ZBHI, 0 µg/0.1 µg kg -1 min -1 , n = 61), Moderate-Bolus Moderate-Infusion (Group MBMI, 5 µg/0.075 µg kg -1 min -1 , n = 61) and High-Bolus Low-Infusion (Group HBLI, 10 µg/0.05 µg kg -1 min -1 , n = 61)-according to different combinations of norepinephrine infusion and bolus doses. All patients received spinal anesthesia with 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 12.5 µg fentanyl. Immediately after cerebrospinal fluid was obtained, patients underwent a norepinephrine protocol corresponding to the randomized group. The primary outcome was the incidence of post-spinal hypotension. Secondary outcomes were post-delivery hypotension, frequency of post-spinal hypertension and bradycardia, and neonatal outcomes. The incidence of post-spinal hypotension was 11.7% in Group HBLI, 6.7% in Group ZBHI and 1.7% in Group MBMI ( p = 0.1). The overall incidence of post-delivery hypotension in parturients was 41.1% ( p = 0.797). The lowest frequency of post-spinal bradycardia (8.3%) and hypertension (11.7%) was seen in Group HBLI. The neonatal APGAR scores at 1st minute were higher in Group MBMI than in Group ZBHI (8.58 vs. 8.23, p = 0.001). All three infusion and bolus dose combinations of norepinephrine effectively reduced the incidence of post-spinal hypotension. However, high-dose bolus (10 µg) followed by low-dose infusion (0.05 µg kg -1 min -1 ) of norepinephrine can be preferred due to the reduced frequency of bradycardia and hypertension during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.

Endoscopic procedures are routinely applied to cancer screening programs and surveillance. The preferred technique is usually deep sedation with propofol being a convenient agent allowing for a quicker patient recovery while maintaining a similar safety profile compared to traditional agents. However, adverse events, including respiratory depression and consequent undesirable cardiovascular side effects, may occur. The goal of this work is to evaluate the patient safety impact of adding capnography during endoscopic procedures under deep propofol sedation. Data were retrospectively collected from patients undergoing deep, procedural sedation for gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy in October 2019 to January 2021 in a single Turkish university hospital. Included in the analysis were all adult patients classified by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) as I-IV, who were scheduled for GI endoscopy utilizing propofol alone or in combination. Data on 1840 patients were collected, of whom 1610 (730 pre- and 880 post-capnography implemention) met inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was a change in the composite incidence of mild oxygen desaturation (SpO 2 75-90% for <60 s), severe oxygen desaturation (SpO 2 < 75% anytime or <90% for >60 s), bradycardia (<60 ppm), and tachycardia (>25% from baseline). Without capnography, on average, 7.5 events of the primary endpoint were observed per 100 procedures and 2.9 with additional capnography monitoring ( p < 0.001). A significant reduction was observed for mild oxygen desaturation, with a resulting odds ratio of 0.25 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.46). ASA I patients had the highest difference in combined incidence of any oxygen desaturation of 5.85% in the pre-capnography group and 0.64% in the post-capnography group. Although procedural sedation using propofol is not associated with severe adverse events, the incidence of composite adverse events could be reduced with the addition of capnography monitoring.

Objective: Debates continue about the cricoid pressure, which has been used for many years to prevent gastric aspiration during intubation. Using ultrasound, the effects of this maneuver and alternatives like paralaryngeal pressure are revealed. The aim of this observational study was to determine the effect of paralaryngeal pressure with an ultrasound probe on the esophageal diameter in patients with different body mass indexes and neck circumferences., Methods: After measuring the neck circumference at the level of the cricoid cartilage, the esophagus was visualized by ultrasonography. Compression was applied medially at a 45° angle toward the vertebral column by the ultrasound probe and esophageal anteroposterior outer diameters were measured. Correlations between body mass index, neck circumference, esophageal diameter, and esophageal diameter change ratio were evaluated with Pearson's r value., Results: One hundred ten volunteers (52 women and 58 men) with mean age 33.7 ± 8.02 years and mean body mass index 25.6 ± 4.65 kg m-2 were recruited. The esophagus was located 78.18% partially to the left, 4.54% completely to the left, 1.81% to the right of the cricoid ring. In 15.45%, esophagus could not be displayed. The mean diameter of the esophagus was 7.6 ± 1.1 mm before pressure and 5.6 ± 0.09 mm after pressure (P < .001). There was no significant correlation between diameter change percentage and body mass index (r=-0.22; P > .05). However, weak correlation was found between diameter change percentage and neck circumference (r=-0.33; P=.016)., Conclusions: Paralaryngeal pressure with an ultrasound probe has the potential to occlude the esophagus and may be effective in all patient groups.

Background: In this study, we aimed to compare ultrasoundguided versus bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy outcomes in critically ill adult patients undergoing a median sternotomy., Methods: Between January 2015 and December 2020, a total of 54 patients (17 males, 37 females; mean age: 54.9±13.1 years; range, 39 to 77 years) who underwent elective ultrasound- or bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy after a median sternotomy were included. We compared the ultrasound-guided group (n=25) with the bronchoscopy-guided group (n=29) regarding all-cause mortality and complications. Safety assessments included major and minor bleeding, procedural hypoxic or hypotensive event, cardiac dysrhythmias, tracheal injury, damage to adjacent structures, and requirement of conversion to open surgical tracheostomy., Results: No tracheostomy procedure-related death was observed in either group. The median time for tracheostomy was 13 (range, 8 to 17) min in the ultrasound-guided group and 10 (range, 7 to 15) min in the bronchoscopy-guided group (p=0.387). There was no need for conversion between the two methods or conversion to surgical tracheostomy for any patient. The overall complication rates did not significantly differ between the groups (p=0.15)., Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy can be safely performed in patients undergoing sternotomy. Complication rates of the procedure are similar to those guided with bronchoscopy., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article., (Copyright © 2021, Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery.)

Background: Endotracheal intubation is a key skill for clinicians and may be challenging in some patients due to various reasons. Nowadays, various kinds of videolaryngoscopes are available and usually used as a rescue device when direct laryngoscopy failed. Pediatric airway has some differences when compared with adults and may be challenging. This study aims to compare and evaluate C Mac D-Blade and commonly used Macintosh laryngoscope in pediatric patients., Methods: In this study, 56 pediatric patients, 5-10 years old (10-40 kgs) who had undergone elective surgery and need endotracheal intubation were included after obtaining ethical board approval and informed consent from parents. The patients were randomized into two equal groups for laryngoscopy and intubation by either with Macintosh laryngoscope or C Mac D-Blade videolaryngoscope. Glottic view, number of attempts, intubation time, any complications and hemodynamic variables were recorded. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant., Results: In pediatric patients with unanticipated difficult airway, the mean intubation time was significantly shorter with C Mac D-Blade (21±9 and 41±7 seconds, respectively (p<0.001). The results of the two groups were similar concerning the remaining parameters., Conclusion: C Mac D-Blade videolaryngoscope shortened intubation time about twice when compared to Macintosh blade C Mac D-Blade videolaryngoscope, Videolaryngoscopes may be a good alternative for routine intubation, education and a rescue device for difficult intubation.

Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of patients with uterine cancer, who were operated using advanced or conventional bipolar instruments., Materials and Methods: Patients with clinically early-stage endometrial cancer were randomized to advanced (LigaSure) or conventional (Robi forceps) bipolar groups. Surgeries were performed by laparoscopy. Hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy were done in all cases. Primary endpoint of the study was to compare operation time for 2 groups. Other perioperative outcomes were also compared. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number of the study was NCT02822820., Results: Sixty-eight cases with endometrial cancer were randomized to 2 groups and each group included 34 subjects. Mean age and body mass index of all cases were 56.8 ± 10.4 years and 31.1 ± 5.3 kg/m 2 , respectively. Mean operation time was found significantly shorter in advanced bipolar group (134.2 ± 29.7 minutes versus 163.5 ± 27.7 minutes, P < .001). The other variables investigated such as intraoperative blood loss, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative pain scores did not show statistically significant difference between the groups., Conclusion: Operation time was shorter in advanced bipolar group, however, advanced and conventional bipolar energy instruments were comparable for other perioperative outcomes in laparoscopic endometrial cancer surgery.

Obstetric anesthesia is one of the high risk subspecialties of anesthesia practice. Anesthesia related complications are the sixth leading cause of maternal mortality. Difficult or failed intubation following induction of general anesthesia for CS remains the major contributory factor to anesthesia-related maternal complications. The airway management of obstetric patients is a challenging issue for several reasons. Anatomic and physiologic changes related to pregnancy may increase the difficult and failed intubation rates compared to the general surgical population. Proper evaluation of the airway anatomy and airway structures is vital to prevent airway management related catastrophes. In addition to basic airway and intubation equipment, each anesthesia department must have difficult intubation equipment cart including fiber optic laryngoscope, video laryngoscopes, and different types of laryngeal masks. It is essential that all anesthesiologists have a preconceived and well thought-out algorithm and emergency airway equipment to deal with airway emergencies during difficult or failed intubation of a parturient.

Malignant hyperthermia is a hypermetabolic response to inhalation agents (such as halothane, sevoflurane, and desflurane), succinylcholine, vigorous exercise, and heat. Reactions develop more frequently in males than females (2 : 1). The classical signs of malignant hyperthermia are hyperthermia, tachycardia, tachypnea, increased carbon dioxide production, increased oxygen consumption, acidosis, muscle rigidity and rhabdomyolysis. In this case report, we present a case of delayed onset malignant hyperthermia-like reaction after the second exposure to sevoflurane.