An outbreak of streptococcal infections among Navy Recruits afforded a study of 107 rheumatic fever cases in adults with a wide variety of clinical manifestations. These 107 cases, of whom at least 81 were associated with a streptococcal epidemic, and six children with acute rheumatic attacks, which occurred sporadically, were observed closely and treated with salicylates and/or cortisone. In addition to the routine blood tests, parallel DPA and CRP determinations were made on aliquots of blood samples taken at appropriate intervals. During the period of acute manifestations the four color determinations described in this report were positive. As the effects of treatment or spontaneous recovery became manifest, the CRP, and the purple color test (corrected DPA level as previously reported) reached normal. It was observed that the DPA determination, as read directly without correction, remained high for many weeks during convalescence. In fact, it was elevated in 133 instances after the CRP tests had indicated that inflammation had subsided. In most instances this DPA elevation was interpreted as indicating the presence of subclinical inflammation; in some instances it was the precursor of a frank rheumatic exacerbation. It is emphasized that an elevated DPA value does not necessarily indicate rheumatic fever but is only a reflection of inflammation. Nevertheless, the persistence of an elevated DPA value following a rheumatic attack, in the v absence of evidence of infection, may be interpreted as an expression of subclinical rheumatic inflammation. The possibility that the persistently elevated DPA level is a “false positive” cannot be excluded but seems unlikely. Although nonspecific, this test affords perhaps the most useful laboratory guide now available for the care of the rheumatic patient. For example, it is not subject to certain defects of the ESR. Furthermore, it provides a wide range of values in both good health (0.228 to 0.352) and during inflammation (0.352 to 0.930). Finally, it is an objective, accurate, quantitative measurement. When the DPA value has returned to normal, one can reasonably assume that rheumatic inflammation either has probably been completely suppressed by a drug or has spontaneously subsided. If the DPA persists at a high level after a rheumatic attack, one may reasonably assume that fresh rheumatic lesions, which may lead to heart damage, are occurring. If these observations and their interpretation be correct, treatment should be directed as early as possible in the rheumatic attack to provide a drug dosage adequate at least to suppress all inflammation as reflected by a prompt fall of the DPA value to a normal level. The need remains for a specific laboratory method which will provide an exact end point between activity and quiescence of the rheumatic state.