Search

BACKGROUND In ELITE (Ernahrung, Lebensstil und individuelle Information zur Verhinderung von Herzinfarkt, Schlaganfall und Demenz; german for: Nutrition, Lifestyle and Individual Information for the Prevention of Heart Attack, Stroke and Dementia) data on cardiovascular risk factors, cognitive function and quality of life are prospectively collected, which will be improved through targeted individual information. The aim is to improve the health of the participants and identify the reasons for the lack of implementation. METHODS Risk factors of 4602 participants were linked to (controlled) hypertension and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Blood pressure was measured according to the guidelines and the DEMTECT- test was used to detect MCI. RESULTS The most common risk factor was hypertension (60%). Hypertensive patients were older (56.1 and 44.7 years), had a higher BMI (28 and 24.8 kg/m), frequently physical inactive (26 and 32.4%), diabetes (9.3 and 1.3%), higher LDL (134.7 and 124.1 mg/dl), higher triglycerides (169.6 and 124.8 mg/dl) and lower HDL (57.9 and 65.5 mg/dl) compared with normotensives (P

Bastian Schrader,1 Anna-Maria Bünker,2,3 Charis Conradi,1 Stephan Lüders,2,4 Bernhard Vaske,5 Michael Koziolek,3 Hermann Haller,6 Albrecht Elsässer,1 Joachim Schrader1,2 1Department of Cardiology in Klinikum Oldenburg, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany; 2Institute for Hypertension and Cardiovascular Research (INFO), Cloppenburg, Germany; 3Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; 4Department of Nephrology, St.-Josefs-Hospital, Cloppenburg, Germany; 5Department of Statistics, Institute for Hypertension and Cardiovascular Research (INFO), Cloppenburg, Germany; 6Clinic for Renal and Hypertensive Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, GermanyCorrespondence: Bastian Schrader Email bastian.schrader@uni-Oldenburg.deIntroduction: It is well documented that insufficient physical activity (PA) contributes substantially to cardiovascular diseases. The number of physically active people in Germany is still too low.Methods: In ELITE study in Germany, 4602 participants are regularly examined for cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF). The aim is to motivate participants to improve their CVRF through individual recommendations and regular follow-up. Here, the PA data are presented in correlation with CVRF at baseline. A feature of this presentation is that the usual CVRF but also the effects on psychosocial factors were recorded simultaneously.Results: Participants were divided into 3 groups based on their PA: 1. frequent exercise (FE): daily to 2– 3x per week (41.4%), 2. moderate exercise (ME): 1x/week to 2x/month (28.8%), 3. rarely exercise (RE): 1x/month to not at all (29.8%). Age did not differ in the 3 groups. The most common CVRF was arterial hypertension, which decreased significantly with an increase in PA. Diabetes, nicotine, and increased BMI were also significantly less frequent in group 1. Antihypertensives were taken less frequently in this group 1. Less physically active participants were significantly more likely to have 3 or more additional CVRF. While group 1 consumed more fruit (64%) and considerably less pork, in group 2 and 3 only 58.3% and 50.3% respectively included fruit in their diet. FE also had a favorable effect on stress, depression and general well-being, all of which were significantly better in group 1.Conclusion: Results confirm the beneficial influences of exercise on known CVRF and on psychosocial parameters. The prevalence of several CVRF per person at low levels of sport is of particular concern, as these participants would benefit most. During a 5-year follow-up, participants will receive intensive education on the need to increase PA. It remains to be seen how successful the effort will be.Keywords: sport, exercise, cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, stress, ELITE, nutrition

OBJECTIVES Football as the most popular sport could improve insufficient physical activity in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. A modified 'healthy' football training format could motivate hypertensive patients to return to sport and improve risk factors. METHODS The 3F study: 'Fit and Fun with Football' a prospective interventional study with 1 year follow-up. Football group: n = 103, structured 'health'-football training (1×/week, 90 min) led by Deutscher Fusball Bund-licensed football coaches. Hypertensive patients at least 45 years who have not exercised for several years were compared with a control group (n = 105). PRIMARY STUDY OBJECTIVE Reduction of office (OBP) and/or 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) and/or reduction of number or dosage of antihypertensive medication. MAIN RESULTS OBP values decreased significantly in the football group from 142.6/87.9 to 130.8/81.8 mmHg (P

Zusammenfassung Einleitung Zur Prävention kardiovaskulärer Risikofaktoren (RF) existieren zahlreiche Empfehlungen von Fachgesellschaften, die sich auf die persönliche Lebensweise von Menschen beziehen (z. B. Ernährung/Diät, körperliche Aktivität, Stressabbau etc.). Die Umsetzung dieser Empfehlungen ist bislang mangelhaft. In der ELITE-Studie sollen in der Region Oldenburger Münsterland prospektiv Daten zu RF, Ernährungsverhalten, körperlicher Aktivität und Lebensqualität erhoben und durch individuelle Information verbessert werden. Gründe für fehlende Umsetzung von Präventionsmaßnahmen sollen erkannt werden. Methoden Die Studie wird als interventionelle Kohorten-Untersuchung durchgeführt (DRKS-Nr.: 00 006 813; Ethikvotum Universität Göttingen). Bis zu 5000 Personen (mit oder ohne Vorerkrankungen) sollten eingeschlossen werden. Alle Teilnehmer erhalten einen computergenerierten Report ihres persönlichen Risikoprofils mit hieraus resultierenden ausführlichen Empfehlungen, die sich an den aktuellen Leitlinien orientieren. Ergänzend wird empfohlen, den Hausarzt aufzusuchen, um die Befunde zu besprechen und ggf. diagnostische oder therapeutische Maßnahmen einzuleiten. Im Jahresabstand erfolgen über bis zu 5 Jahre Follow-Up-Untersuchungen. Ergebnisse Bis zum 31.12.2017 wurden 4602 Teilnehmer (mittleres Alter 51,5 (± 15,7) Jahre; 53,7 % weiblich) aufgenommen. Übergewichtig sind 39 % der Teilnehmer, adipös 20,4 %. Häufigster anamnestischer RF ist Bluthochdruck (31,4 %), mittlerer Blutdruck 138,4 ± 16,6/83,0 ± 9,9 mmHg. 2165 (47,0 %) Teilnehmer weisen hypertone Blutdruckwerte auf. Zweithäufigster anamnestischer RF sind Fettstoffwechselstörungen (16,6 %). Schlussfolgerung Die Häufigkeit von Teilnehmern mit mindestens einem anamnestisch angegebenen kardiovaskulären RF ist sehr hoch (49,5 %; 16,6 % mehrere RF). Die Häufigkeit von RF entspricht anderen epidemiologischen Daten in Deutschland, sodass das ELITE-Kollektiv einen guten Vergleich mit anderen Erhebungen zulässt.

The ELITE study (German acronym for "Nutrition, lifestyle and individual information for prevention of heart attack, stroke and dementia") prospectively collects data on hypertension, cardiovascular risk factors (RF), dietary habits, physical activity, cognitive function, and quality of life in North-West Germany, which will then be improved through targeted individual information. The aim of the study is to improve the health of the participants in the long term and to identify reasons for a lack of implementation of prevention measures.Of 4,602 included subjects, 3,868 could be studied so far at one-year follow-up. Blood pressure (BP) was measured according to the guidelines at admission and blood pressure history, premedication, sports behaviour and BMI were recorded by means of questionnaires and compared with the data collected in the follow-up examination after one year.The participants were evaluated in 4 groups (G): G1 - normotensive patients (n = 1,558), G2 - controlled hypertensive patients (n = 502), G3 - untreated uncontrolled hypertensive patients (n = 1,080), G4 - treated uncontrolled hypertensive patients (n = 728). In G1 blood pressure (RR) remained unchanged from 126.3/77.8 to 127.8/78.5, in G2 there was a significant (p0.001) RR increase from 128.1/77.0 to 134.9/79.8. In G3 and G4 RR decreased significantly (p0.001) from 149.9/90.0 to 143.5/86.9 and from 153.1/87.5 to 146.2 84.1 mmHg, respectively. In G3 and G4, RR decreased in 56.1% and 56.3% of subjects and increased in 18% and 21%, respectively. In contrast, RR increase was found more frequently in G1 and G2 (34.3% and 51%, respectively), and RR decrease less frequently (25.4 and 20.7%, respectively). The main reasons for RR decrease were weight loss, more exercise, and more antihypertensives. Frequently, improved compliance and dietary changes were given as reasons. As expected, the opposite often led to RR increase.56% of the hypertensive participants succeeded in lowering their blood pressure, whereas there was a significant increase in blood pressure, especially in those who were well controlled with antihypertensives. This underlines the need to further motivate normotensive patients to maintain their normotension. The results show that the combination of individual written education and lifestyle interventions are an effective tool for the public health sector to combat hypertension. In our participants, lifestyle interventions have a significant impact on BP change. It should be noted critically that there are still too many patients who have not been reached.

Following the publication of the new US guidelines, especially the new classifications of hypertension and the general reduction in treatment targets were discussed worldwide. Applying the US guidelines to a recent German cohort study would in practice lead to a significant increase in the diagnosis of “hypertension” in untreated patients. The number of under-adjusted patients would also increase sharply, increasing more than those predicted in the US Guidelines. Affected by an intensified antihypertensive therapy would be particularly elderly patients, in which adverse drug reactions but also occur more frequently. It seems doubtful whether the massive increase in the diagnosis “hypertension” can improve the supply situation: the opposite effect of avoiding therapists and patients could occur. Determining the individual risk with suitable, evaluated instruments certainly makes sense to treat more targeted patients. More important than new blood pressure limits is a more accurate classification of blood pressure. Repeated self-measurements and ambulatory blood pressure measurement lead to a better selection of patients benefiting from a therapy.

For the prevention of cardiovascular risk factors (RF) there are numerous recommendations of professional societies, which relate to the personal way of life of individuals (for example nutrition/diet, physical activity, stress reduction etc.). The implementation of these recommendations is so far poor. In the ELITE study, data on RF, nutritional behavior, physical activity and quality of life in the Oldenburger Münsterland region are to be collected prospectively and improved by individual information. Reasons for the lack of implementation of preventive measures should be recognized.The study is conducted as an interventional cohort study (DRKS-No.: 00 006 813, Ethics vote University of Göttingen). Up to 5000 people (with or without pre-existing RF) are aimed to be included. All participants receive a computer-generated report of their personal risk profile with detailed recommendations based on current guidelines. In addition, it is recommended to visit the family doctor to discuss the findings and, if necessary, initiate diagnostic or therapeutic measures. Every year, follow-up examinations take place for up to 5 years.By 31.12.2017 4602 participants (mean age 51.5 (± 15.7) years, 53.7 % female) were admitted. Overweight were 39 % of the participants, obese 20.4 %. Most frequent anamnestic RF is hypertension (31.4 %), mean blood pressure was 138.4 ± 16.6/83.0 ± 9.9 mmHg. 2165 (47.0 %) participants show hypertensive blood pressure values. The second most frequent anamnestic RF are lipid metabolism disorders (16.6 %).The incidence of participants with at least one cardiovascular RF is very high (49.5 %, 16.6 % multiple RF). The incidence of RF is similar to other epidemiological data in Germany, so the ELITE collective allows a good comparison with other surveys.Zur Prävention kardiovaskulärer Risikofaktoren (RF) existieren zahlreiche Empfehlungen von Fachgesellschaften, die sich auf die persönliche Lebensweise von Menschen beziehen (z. B. Ernährung/Diät, körperliche Aktivität, Stressabbau etc.). Die Umsetzung dieser Empfehlungen ist bislang mangelhaft. In der ELITE-Studie sollen in der Region Oldenburger Münsterland prospektiv Daten zu RF, Ernährungsverhalten, körperlicher Aktivität und Lebensqualität erhoben und durch individuelle Information verbessert werden. Gründe für fehlende Umsetzung von Präventionsmaßnahmen sollen erkannt werden.Die Studie wird als interventionelle Kohorten-Untersuchung durchgeführt (DRKS-Nr.: 00 006 813; Ethikvotum Universität Göttingen). Bis zu 5000 Personen (mit oder ohne Vorerkrankungen) sollten eingeschlossen werden. Alle Teilnehmer erhalten einen computergenerierten Report ihres persönlichen Risikoprofils mit hieraus resultierenden ausführlichen Empfehlungen, die sich an den aktuellen Leitlinien orientieren. Ergänzend wird empfohlen, den Hausarzt aufzusuchen, um die Befunde zu besprechen und ggf. diagnostische oder therapeutische Maßnahmen einzuleiten. Im Jahresabstand erfolgen über bis zu 5 Jahre Follow-Up-Untersuchungen.Bis zum 31.12.2017 wurden 4602 Teilnehmer (mittleres Alter 51,5 (± 15,7) Jahre; 53,7 % weiblich) aufgenommen. Übergewichtig sind 39 % der Teilnehmer, adipös 20,4 %. Häufigster anamnestischer RF ist Bluthochdruck (31,4 %), mittlerer Blutdruck 138,4 ± 16,6/83,0 ± 9,9 mmHg. 2165 (47,0 %) Teilnehmer weisen hypertone Blutdruckwerte auf. Zweithäufigster anamnestischer RF sind Fettstoffwechselstörungen (16,6 %).Die Häufigkeit von Teilnehmern mit mindestens einem anamnestisch angegebenen kardiovaskulären RF ist sehr hoch (49,5 %; 16,6 % mehrere RF). Die Häufigkeit von RF entspricht anderen epidemiologischen Daten in Deutschland, sodass das ELITE-Kollektiv einen guten Vergleich mit anderen Erhebungen zulässt.

Following the publication of the new US guidelines, especially the new classifications of hypertension and the general reduction in treatment targets were discussed worldwide. Applying the US guidelines to a recent German cohort study would in practice lead to a significant increase in the diagnosis of "hypertension" in untreated patients. The number of under-adjusted patients would also increase sharply, increasing more than those predicted in the US Guidelines. Affected by an intensified antihypertensive therapy would be particularly elderly patients, in which adverse drug reactions but also occur more frequently. It seems doubtful whether the massive increase in the diagnosis "hypertension" can improve the supply situation: the opposite effect of avoiding therapists and patients could occur. Determining the individual risk with suitable, evaluated instruments certainly makes sense to treat more targeted patients. More important than new blood pressure limits is a more accurate classification of blood pressure. Repeated self-measurements and ambulatory blood pressure measurement lead to a better selection of patients benefiting from a therapy.